User talk:Wernher - Knowledge (XXG)

2696:

där redovisas "Concours par équipe" i VM 1958 och 59 - utan anmärkning om inofficiellt". "Norsk Idrettsleksikon" beskriver også disse øvelsene som "lag" uten noen forbehold. Har ført inn tider og antall bom. Bom i lag 58-59 kommer senere. Ellers har jeg på hovedsiden linket alle årstall, rettet noen små feil i medaljetabellen og lagt til en kommentar i ingressen. På sidene for årene 2000-2004 har jeg endret formatet i tråd med foregående år, så flagg og land står i kolonne. Når det gjelder nummereringen av mesterskapene ser jeg at man har utelatt 1976 og 2006, men tatt med 1992, 1994, 1998 og 2002. Det burde vel være enten/eller, uavhengig om det er en eller to (1998 4) øvelser. Eller er dette nummerering fra IBU? Hva mener du? mvh

1770:. The 8080 'inspired' both the Z80 and the origin of the x86 (specifically, the 16-week development of the 8086), but I wouldn't say the Z80 as such inspired the x86---that dubious honor goes, understandably, to the 8080. Also note that 8086 asm is very similar to (being directly based on) 8080 asm, not Z80 asm; the latter, as you might know, was significantly different (for copyright reasons I assume). Myself, I actually think 8080 asm is clearer and more intuitive than Z80 asm, but that's not relevant here, I guess... :-) 2389: 3318:(i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. 4787: 4513: 4359: 4203: 4006: 4729: 2308: 4887: 4456: 4309: 3768: 3720: 3343: 4695: 4657: 4619: 3590: 3398: 21: 3912: 3818: 2450: 3082: 2799: 2621: 2043: 1317:. Any assistance you could provide on these is greatly appreciated. The Simons' BASIC article has all 114 commands described (not copied and pasted; I rewrote all 114 descriptions in my own words!) I am not all that familiar with these software packages, not having used them extensively back "in the day", so if you know more about them, perhaps you can contribute. 4746:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 3678: 3302: 2870: 1102:

vandalise since although the content is not gibberish and looks half decent, he knows he is going against consensus and he rarely finishes the job, spmetimes leaving a mess. His last attempts on the Olympic athletics pages included removing the results as well as adding flags???? If that's not vandalism I don't know what is.

320:

to specialists in the field. In other words, by removing that distinction you're making those lists less useful. If you think some other names for the two sections would be better, I'd be happy to hear them, but please don't take out information for out readers which I have made an extra effort to add. Thanks!

2695:

er det hentet fra "Sportsboken 1965". Tok med stafetten her for å klargjøre at det er den eneste gangen man har hatt uoffisiell VM-øvelse. Ellers kan jeg sitere fra en mail jeg fikk av en venn i Sverige. "Ifråga om lagtävlingen i skidskytte-VM 1958-65 har jag hittat UIPMBs bulletin 1 (31.12.1960) och

1944:

I've been removing the "Early computer" category from articles that didn't qualify. Two that I've not removed are BESM and Odra. These are articles about a computer series; the individual machines (systems) would qualify. Removing the category from the series article, requiring individual listings

387:

I like all of your suggestion, with the sole exception of the name of the second subheading. "Academic sources" sounds a bit clunky. I'll see if I can come up with something better... But I can see that making the TOC smaller (especially for short articles) is really a good idea. Oh, and I think I'll

352:

Hello and thanks for making me aware of your rationale for dividing the article reference section into two---Further reading and References. The only reason I collapsed them into one sec was my perceived notion of "std wkp format", and to keep the number of "auxiliary secs"* as low as possible (which

3465:

that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so

3309:

in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have

1854:

is now claiming that to include a person on a a list of Irish Americans, they specifically have to be described as such, even if they are described as having an Irish parent/grandparent, unless they are described specifically as Irish American themselves or by somebody else he will exclude them from

1701:

also apply some general fixes as I go along). Might look into it later though, but it will probably take me a good week to get though the current batch. If you use either Windows 2000 or XP you can try out the AWB tool for yourself though (let me know if you want me to add you to the "aproved users"

469:

On the lower right side of the photo, just beside von Braun's left hand, and extending out of the picture, is a white ruler'ish object. I happen to own a couple of slide rules of the same model as von Braun's—a German pre-war model that von Braun brought two of from Peenemünde to the US—and I wonder

319:

I carefully split the list up into two sections (as I often do when I add such information on Knowledge (XXG)) because I distinguish between i) things that non-specialist readers ought to go to if they want more information than is in the article, and ii) things that will only be useful/intelligible

193:

I've not virulently opposed to your comment style, but it is not the standard style: if you think it is clearly better then please reinstate (as I see you have already done). I've principally been concentrating on copyediting (judged on the content, I think most of the contributors have English as a

1490:

In case you haven't seen this already, I tried to nominate the 3DMAZE article as a FAC, and got generally negative response so far. I've incorporated most of the voters' constructive requests into the article, but one thing remains unanswered — they say that the article is still too short. It would

1469:

Great work. I'll take a nitpickingly close look at all the MOS stuff after Newyear's. :-) I tend to prefer ultra-simple block diagrams drawn with black outlines on white, for clarity and ease of reading. If we decide to do that, it's done in a jiffy to change those SVG diagrams, of course. For now,

661:

I don't know if SEAC is Standards EASTERN Automatic Computer or ELECTONIC. I thought it was Eastern, and I had it moved from Electronic to Eastern. But since then I found contemporary reports calling it Electronic. People (including me) may have assumed that the E was Eastern since the W in SWAC

520:

OK, I've stopped moving things. My main motivation for doisng the rename/move: PEEK and POKE are so closely related that they needed to be merged into a single article, and the polymer called PEEK is a direct name-clash for the PEEK instruction. All this can be sorted using standard disambiguation

3967:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

3873:

2690:

sin diskusjonsside tok opp dette med lagkonkurranser 1958-65. Jeg har tillatt meg å redigere denne siden + undersidene. Disse var tidligere oppført som uoffisielle stafetter, og det er en grov feil som dessverre har forplantet seg mye på nettet. Førte opp som referanse en omfattende sportsside som

1775:

In the Z80 article's Notable uses section there is in fact the passage " a great number of fairly anonymous business-oriented CP/M machines that dominated the market of the time in the way that Windows based machines do today." Maybe one should stress this point---the market-wise similarity of Z80

1385:

to the home computers category (although it was already a member through its category). I believe I understand why you did this - because the list of home computers should not be arbitrarily divided between those that have categories and those that don't. Unfortunately, VIC-20 now has two entries,

852:

Yes, I thought I'd try to get this sorted out. For the time being I think we'll just make due with having the old pages redirect to the new ones (so that all the now-outdated links will still work), but later we should search-and-replace the whole lot of outdated links with links to the new pages,

1765:

Hmm. The reason I replaced the x86 ref with the 6502 one, was that the 6502 is much more relevant in the historical setting (the era/market of 8-bit desktop microcomputers). I'd say that the x86 connection is much more relevant in regard to the 8080, in which article you will indeed find explicit

1192:

As you may see from the RD talk page, I reverted your removal of Lister. I did so not because I personally disagree (I am ambivalent), but because I felt it was consistent with precedent (see Ashley Burns and her AfD.) As I suggested at RD, I expect any stub to be AfD'ed as Burns was. Until then,

1023:

Thanks for the good vibrations. :) As for the detailed tables, I think it's interesting and relevant information, absolutely, but I'll have to 'meditate' a little about whether we should put them in the floppy article or some other place. BTW, I fixed the tables up a little. Also: do you think we

2113:

Hello. I read what you wrote about the team competition in the world championships. You are right, it was not a relay as it is suggested on the biathlon page. It was an offical world championships for teams by adding the times for the 3 best athletes for each country in the 20 km. (In 1958 the 4

1973:

Hælleu!Held på å oversettje til norsk nokre av artiklane om heimedatamaskiner. Til no har eg oversatt det meste av Commodore portefølja , Sinclair maskinene, samt litt om Dragon 32/64 maskina. Har du tips til kva andre som gjorde det stort eller nokonlunde hertillands? Var nok litt for ung til å

1595:

You're welcome! Myself, I really enjoyed reading about the Galaksija and its BASIC. Totally new territory for me. But that's one reason why I'm a 1970s/80s hobbyist/home computer enthusiast, of course---you never stop being captivated by all the creativity and enterprise of hobbyists, small tech

945:

Actually it does. The last entry in the fourth column is wrapped in my setup. However, I did check at a higher resolution and both variants looks OK there. However, my numbers were not chose at random; in my view (:-) the third and fourth colum has app. the same amount of information (and type),

759:

In that regard, I wondered if you could please point me towards the particular wikibot (code) carrying out the traversing of the categorized articles and the category marker replacements? I'm trying to learn wikibot programming (eventually hoping to 'graduate' to a higher level of existence as a

929:

OK, I guess the aesthetics is a question of each contributor's preferences as well as any differences in rendering by various browsers, in various screen sizes/resolutions... Anyway, the rationale for my edits was that the table looked better with the first and third, and the second and fourth,

2098:

article and I'm having trouble finding sources about the airport project. I'm assuming sources would be easier to find if I understood Norwegian, but unfortunately I don't. I'm hoping you can help out, either by finding such a source yourself or forwarding the request to one you project Norway

1101:

It is definitely the same guy. He has asked me for help on at least two occasions. i assume he was being sarcastic but it shows he can reply if he wants to. I have been aggressively reverting him on the athletics pages and he has not being vandalising the pages in the last few weeks. i say

2691:

faktisk har dette riktig. IBU har på sin webside resultatene (mangler dog navn!) fra 20 km, bortsett fra de 2 første årene. Det var jo bare ett renn, men med to konkurranser. IBU-siden har faktisk et bilde av det norske laget i 1958 som mottar medaljer. Hvis du ser på hva jeg har gjort for

1934:. Let me think about it for a while --- we should be careful in updating the tree, so that we keep it nice and tidy, i.e. systematic and general. Accidentally messing up category tree/definition updates occurs far too often, I know from experience. Again, thanks for your concern. -- 1702:

list for it). Just feed it a list of pages, set up your replace patterns and start it up. Then all you need to do is review the diffs and hit save if everyting is ok on every page, it's excelent for this kind of mindless work that still require a human to keep an eye on things. --

2358:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 532:

Well, oh well. After having calmed down and thought about it a little, I actually came to the same conclusion as you did---so please feel free to go ahead sorting out the dbl redirects etc. I will do my part as well. Thanks for answering my "distress call", anyway. :-)

3121:

Due to your past contribution to Technological utopianism, you may currently want to help editing the Technological utopianism article because currently only one editor is contributing to the article. The Singularitarianism Article could also benefit from your help.

1955:

Don't know why I've taken interest in this category; just a random event. As a newby, I've only been causing trouble for a few months. I do have a question: how can I do a search that returns all of the categories containing "Comput" (computer, computing, ...)?

4911:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

4482:

853:

and then delete the redirect pages. I'll take care of it eventually. Also, I'm going to coerce the project page itself into the standard format. I feel a little responsible; being the guy who 'tricked you' into making a project page in the first place. :-) --

358:

Perhaps a reasonable compromise would be to use a References sec only, but to list the references under separate italicized** subheadings (not subsecs---they also clutter up the TOC & article IMO; even worse than separate secs), my suggestions being

2218: 1948:

The IBM 700/7000 series entry remains, even though it is not a series and most machines are individually listed. Will remove it when all the individual machines are listed. (Similar to ILLIAC, which I did remove as the ILLIAC 1 & 2 are listed).

205:

Hi; thank you very much for the copyediting -- I actually learn a lot by watching my English being tuned and massaged by other contributors! :) And thanks for not making a big deal of the src comment style delims I use(d). As for the majority of the

4915:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

3369:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

1090:

Hi, I replied to your comment on that page just now - I think the anon IP who keeps adding flags and messes up the page is the same guy who did it to the athletics pages, in which case we'll probably not get him to click on the talk pages.

2076:, an automated process that notifies editors that articles to which they may have contributed on more than one occasion in the past now need cleanup. If you have any comments or object to this message being left, please leave a message on 1386:

which clutters up the category. What is needed is a way to tell the wiki software, "put this category among the articles, not among the subcategories". Since you are an admin, perhaps you can bring this to the attention of the developers.

930:

column being of equal widths---as this wide-narrow-wide-narrow layout corresponds somewhat with the amount of information in the columns, IMO. Does this for some reason look bad in your setup? (or is it just a preferential matter?). --

3306: 4907: 4152:

about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

4479: 3521:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

2174:

Btw, the article is still 111 kilobytes long. I thought of splitting off each individual meet (or "block of meets" - i.e. pre-Christmas, January, and the three March events), and shortening the main article as outlined in

210:

editors being second-language English writers, I think you're probably correct; I would guess many if not most of us are Norwegians and Germans, as the subject -ehem- relates to us in a more, shall we say, direct, way. :)

1780:

Jag har också skrivit (t.ex om ZX81 "internal workings") under namnen "Henke"/"Henric" samt anonymt, men glömt lösenorden - skall inte hända igen... (ursäkta en skandinavisk mening, men jag såg ju att du var från Norge!)

1696:

Hi, actualy I'm working on a list of some 4900 articles (down to 3969 now, whew!) in an effort to orphan some flag images that are redundant. So I'm focusing exclusively on replacing the flag images at the moment (the

506:

Nope, didn't see the announcement(s), so thanks for informing me! :-) Highly relevant for my on-off work on military articles; I always want to use existing standards---or if none exist, to help get some established.

3373:

3024: 50:

If you post a message on this page, I'll reply on this page to avoid fragmenting the discussion. If I've left you a message on your talk page, I will be watching it, so you're most welcome to reply there rather than

4486:

2957: 1239:

about whether every World Cup winter-sports event deserves its own listing on the "Upcoming events" pane. It seems to be common practice for other sports to list only the season and important events (such as the

3634:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 964:

Still as bad as before? (I did some tweaking again; not sure as to whether we should be layout-nitpicking like this, though, as I guess the pages are bound to come out wrongly for some users whatever we do...).

2332:, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found 3245:

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

1750:

related to z80 than the 6502 is, both technically and regarding involved people. It is certainly not a coincidence that the two assembly languages are so similar. My suggestion is to move references to

2354:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2351:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

2635:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " 2813:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 3736: 1061:

Nice touches - I'm a bit sloppy sometimes. As for the N/A - in this context they stood for Not Applicable since that particular format did not have an index cylinder. So...no; no TBDs. :-) --

1408:

for my first such technical drawing. This one took the better part of a day, but now that it exists, it should be much easier to adapt it so that we can have pinouts for chip articles like

3601: 2421:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 2282:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 3208:

articles. On the contrary, I am the person most responsible for expanding the former article with content some would argue is “pro-techno-utopian” (i.e. passages from James Hughes' book

3430:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 4706: 4668: 4630: 2154: 2824:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

2642:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

4325: 3784: 2686:

Hei Wernher. Håper det er OK at jeg skriver til deg direkte på din side og på norsk. Det må sies at jeg på ingen måte er noen ekspert på Knowledge (XXG). Skriver til deg fordi du på

1791:

Inga problem alls! :-) Alla lösenord och PIN-koder man måste komma ihåg hela tiden kan bli lite mycket enkelte gånger. Grattis med dom starka Vinter-OS-prestationerna, förresten! --

3561: 665:

I created the redirect page "SEAC (computer)" and I think the article chould go there, with redirects from the other two names. Since you are an administrator, can you do that?

430:

Hmm. I will accept this for the 68008, but I still think the 68012 article should be merged with the 68010 one---due to the very small differences between those two processors. --

4948: 3172:"Although I am convinced that the world is in fact heading toward an ecological catastrophe, I think it can be averted and my optimism makes me want to fight to do do just that." 106:. Most of what you do is easily reversible by other sysops, apart from page history merges and image deletion, so please be especially careful with those. You might find the new 3693: 3559:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 2643: 1984:

Hi there, I got your message, and I think you've covered the major 1980's 8-bit home computers in the Norwegian market. You might, however, also want to add translations of the

4943: 2417:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2278:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

3426:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2521: 1350:

version of the MOS Technology logo. The advantage of this is that it can be displayed at almost any size requested without pixelation or other forms of distortion. Please see

1267: 3018: 1446:. This contains an updated version of my chip pinout (including a MOS logo and gradient shading). Of course, the size and the pin assignments were updated correspondingly. 3265:

in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and all users will still be able to manually mark their edits as being minor in the usual way.

4032:

requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and

2951: 367::. How about that? Anyway, I will certainly work through (some of) "my own" articles (those on my watchlist, that is) in order to split the refs into said categories. -- 3096: 3270: 2825: 495: 3099:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 4319:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the 2410:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

2271:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

1585:

though. The CPU actually generated video signal itself with little help of shifters. That's it! I will wait until you finish and then fix this little thing only. --

3419:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see

3415:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 2406:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 2267:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 2483:, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at 335: 4133:

I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Walrusoft should be deleted. Your comments are welcome over

1930:

Hi, thanks for caring! Your comment is a very significant one; I must admit I had completely forgotten to specify the analog/digital distinction in the related

353:

leads to more concise articles, IMO making them more readable). However, I very much see your point, especially after reading your comment at my talk page. :)

1416:. I'm thinking about slapping together a simple application that would let me enter the number of pins and the pin names and then automatically generate the 4896: 4468: 4134: 3355: 1746:

Hi Wernher, it was certainly not me that added the x86 statment to the Z80 article introduction, but, I still feel that one could easily argue that x86 is

1491:

be great if you could look at it and expand it further or just give advice on what to do, beyond doing original research of the game by dis-assembly :-) --

3945: 3851: 775:, it is full of resources of bots, code, and the bots that are currently running. Most of the users on there may be able to help you better. Also, see: 3544: 2882: 2329: 107: 99: 125:

And cheers to you, Cecropia! Yes, I'll certainly study the admin reading list to avoid destructive and/or embarrassing f###ups. (Oops, I suddenly feel

4850: 4758: 4581: 4420: 4264: 4087: 4025: 3949: 3941: 3901: 3855: 3847: 3807: 3435: 3366: 2426: 2359: 2348: 2344: 2325: 2287: 331: 194:

second langauge - which is not to denigrate their excellent command of English - I certainly would not even try to write in another language!). --

2768: 2132: 1681:

article. See the recently updated image page, with the URL and source info included. Thanks for reminding me; the fair use tag needed changing. --

1554: 1457: 1431: 1365: 1193:

Lister should stay, if for no other reason than to alert RD viewers when a stub is done, so that it might be nominated for deletion. Best wishes,

3948:

how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the

3854:

how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the

3778:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the 3730:, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the 3311: 1920:

You seem to be the significant editor; is the omission of "digital" accidental or deliberate? There is one analog machine listed now. Thanks,

1084: 494:

Hi. My watchlist shows that you were interested enough to work on a military-topic article, so I wanted to make sure you were aware of the new

4330: 3789: 3741: 3566: 2363: 4702: 4664: 4626: 3685: 3597: 3659: 3216: 3178: 3526: 3219:

would take comments I made out of context to falsely make it seem I see my editing of any article as part of my fight for the environment.

1518: 422:

entries. The fact that these articles are small is not a valid reason to merge. Small is good! I hope you will revert the merge requests.

1804:

Tack! Men jag tillhör de 2% som föredrar att dricka min öl medan jag lyssnar på jazz, inte på sport - men jag tackar för vänligheten! --

2596: 2573: 839:

Thanks for sorting out the different pages and getting them into more prominent places on Knowledge (XXG). I'm watching and learning.

4029: 3200:

who is critical of techno-utopianism in all its forms, I have let never this point of view influence any of my edits or reverts of the

174: 35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 3681: 3670: 2476:

for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

4854: 4585: 4424: 4091: 3972:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 3878:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 3412: 3070: 2788: 2610: 1860: 2692: 4268: 3249:

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (

2157:, and will remain open for some days. If you want to comment, please reply there, not here - comments left here will be ignored. -- 256:

onto my watchlist -- the thread seems to have continued at the latter page. BTW, is your user name in any way related to this nice

919:

Not wrong in itself - but, in my eyes, the table actually looks less aesthetic after your edits. :) Could you please elaborate? --

1755:

6502 and x86 into a new paragraph, to avoid cluttering the introduction to much, but still keep relevant facts. What do you say?

1028:"s, or perhaps keep the N/As but have them link to TBD? We might just happen upon the missing data one sunny day, you know. :) -- 729: 4829: 3458: 3039: 27: 3726: 3711: 3655: 2194: 2150: 4169: 3921: 3827: 3006: 2493:

this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.

295: 2972: 2902: 4842: 4798: 4776: 4742:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 4573: 4524: 4502: 4412: 4370: 4348: 4256: 4214: 4192: 4079: 4017: 3995: 3222:

In light of this outrageous act of bad faith, I will do everything in my power to get this jerk banned from Knowledge (XXG).

2398:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2259:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1873: 253: 4892: 4877: 4794: 4780: 2939: 3427: 2418: 2355: 2279: 1931: 1888: 1586: 4846: 4747: 4743: 4577: 4416: 4260: 4083: 3969: 3875: 3420: 2806: 2628: 2465: 2411: 2272: 479: 3689: 3106: 2687: 562: 4900: 4472: 3646:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3359: 3092: 4315: 4300: 3774: 3759: 3651: 2778: 2764: 2732: 2513: 2504: 1550: 1453: 1427: 1361: 83: 78: 73: 4320: 3928: 3834: 3779: 3731: 3407:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 95: 2019:

Competition at the Asian Games has already begun even if the Opening Ceremony doesn't take place until Friday. See

3000: 1996:, which didn't sell very well in Norway, though. Remember also the two most significant 16-bit home computers, the 1121: 241: 3944:, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not 3850:, because the article appears to be about an organized event (tour, function, meeting, party, etc.) that does not 524:

Hoewever, this also means that I've also stopped the link-tidying process as well. What do you want to do now? --

129:™ pulsating in my veins... the alluring power of adminship beckons me to join the Dark Side... Bwahahahahahhh!!!! 4698: 4687: 3095:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 2061:

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Knowledge (XXG)'s

1327:

Good work, Crotalus. By the way, do either of you guys know whether Mike J. Henry is a real name or a pseudonym?

894: 3555: 3162:"...stop indulging in techno-utopian fantasies... ...so that we can all focus on energies on saving the planet." 2933: 1236: 4399: 3384: 3201: 3182: 3134: 2910: 1543:

to that target, as we discussed on the talk page? I can't do the move without admin powers. Thanks in advance.

3315: 2996: 1153:

Jeg syntes jeg så en 8-bits datamaskin på forsiden, og sannelig var ikke dine fingeravtrykk på den også... :)

3540: 3536: 2600: 4738: 4243: 3984: 3890: 3103: 2577: 2255: 1945:(likely as redirects, but with a category Early computers) didn't seem like something that would add value. 1351: 1263: 102:

before carrying out tasks like deletion, protection, banning users, and editing protected pages such as the

4149: 3953: 3859: 2929: 2814: 2756: 441:

The pin-out is different, so if somebody adds pin-outs in the future it would be good to have it seperate.

4463: 4447: 4366: 4352: 3605: 3574: 2774: 2760: 2728: 2176: 1722: 1545: 1448: 1422: 1356: 1318: 4858: 4660: 4649: 4589: 4560: 4428: 4272: 4095: 4024:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing

3647: 3046: 2894: 2114:

best). There was an unofficial relay in 1965 which led to the indroduction as an official event in 1966.

4323:

guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at

3782:

guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at

3734:

guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at

3593: 2077: 1960: 1921: 1409: 4536: 4210: 4196: 3403: 2890: 2849:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 2667:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 2321: 1657: 4622: 4611: 3964: 3937: 3905: 3870: 3843: 3811: 3310:

been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the

2979: 1851: 457: 4338: 4290: 3797: 3443: 3250: 3231: 2854: 2672: 1731: 1678: 1668: 1271: 887: 647: 499: 276: 4520: 4506: 3623: 3614: 2897: 2480: 2469: 2461: 2443: 1266:. Just thought I'd let you know that piping and excess wikilinks do not go on disambiguation pages. 173:

Hello BACbKA, thanks for noticing my incredibly elevated wikistatus. :) I have now commented on the

3701: 3375: 3286: 3032: 2965: 2430: 2291: 2232:

I noticed that your edits were impressive and so I've decided to award you this Editor's Barnstar!

2184: 1443: 3643: 3627: 3257:). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was 2724: 2697: 2403: 2264: 2118: 771:

I actually do not run a bot yet. I have considered it, just have not got around to doing so. See

4925: 3979: 3885: 3205: 3130: 2632: 2614: 2592: 1601:

Please feel free to fix any errors and inconsistencies at the instants you find them, however! --

1413: 1176: 1154: 916:

table, and left a cryptic comment: "(tbl layout --- please remember the aesthetics, people! :-)"

673:

Working on it now. I f*cked up a little, so I'll have to fix some stuff. I'll take care of it. --

612: 131: 115: 3462: 3254: 2062: 604: 94:

Congratulations! It's my pleasure to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an

3012: 2746:

I think you got the acronym wrong. If my memory serves m right, SOGWAP stood for "Son of God

632: 4866: 4825: 4598: 4556: 4395: 4280: 4239: 4104: 4062: 4041: 3570: 3515: 3502: 3060: 2701: 2394: 2372: 2340: 2316: 2301: 2136: 2100: 2095: 1884: 1707: 600: 376:(* By "auxiliary secs" I mean those "std" secs like See also, References, and External links.) 126: 4037: 4033: 3639: 3631: 3416: 2473: 2407: 2333: 2268: 949:

Ideally the HiFD entry should be trimmed to make it consistent with the rest of the table....

772: 4714: 4676: 4638: 3749: 3490: 3350: 3334: 3323: 2945: 2835:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

2653:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

2553: 2535: 2388: 2233: 2073: 2020: 1382: 1129: 1025: 991: 620: 592: 542:

I've done a bit of link-tidying and dbl redirect fixing. Think it's reasonably OK by now. --

161:

Hi Wernher, and congrats on the adminship. Have you seen the recent edit by Infrogmation at

4812: 4543: 4532: 4382: 4226: 4141: 4049: 3642:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3635: 3467: 2874: 2846: 2836: 2829: 2818: 2664: 2654: 2647: 2636: 2517: 2484: 1856: 1823:

Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (policy)#Guidelines for Knowledge (XXG) lists of ethnic groups

1698: 1632: 4766: 4334: 4286: 3793: 3532: 3439: 3227: 3126: 2850: 2668: 2495: 2488: 2457: 1726: 1664: 1645: 1622: 1481: 1417: 1404:

format to see if it was suitable for creating chip pinout diagrams. Apparently it is: see

1387: 1328: 1296: 1106: 866: 843: 442: 423: 380:(** I have noticed that some other contributors use italics for non-subsec "subheadings".) 272: 257: 226: 198: 3471: 3408: 2987: 2526: 2491:

if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that

2399: 2260: 2054: 2727:

died? Knowledge (XXG) would be improved greatly if there were an article about him.

1310: 1172: 1124:

article on Knowledge (XXG). Any chance you would like to join in editing the wikibook:

341:

PPS: I still don't watch other people's Talk: pages, so any reply here I may never see.

4492: 4436: 4066: 3697: 3282: 3278: 3209: 3088: 3074: 2920: 2328:

as to why its use in Knowledge (XXG) articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the

2180: 1339: 1092: 624: 608: 525: 4811: