User talk:West London Dweller

337:. I have no knowledge of the particular site in question, but it may be worth pointing out that landing points are usually determined by the submarine topology, rather than ease of access at the land-side. If, for example, the shortest distance between Hoy and the main island is terminated by sheer sea-cliffs, those would not be the easiest place to land a cable - on the other hand, if Scad Head has a gently shelving beach, it could be perfect. If there is a path from sea-level to the main part of the land, it's usually possible to bury a cable in that path - at worst, you send in people with pick-axes and shovels if you can't get heavy equipment there. You are quite right, though - it could simply be a case of re-use of exisitng facilities being the easist thing of all. Regards. 1975:

not descend into point-of-view based argumentation. You may well be quite correct in your opinions on DAB, but think of writing the article as an exercise in convincing a nit-picky sceptic who is unbiased, but will examine the minutiae of your argument and sources. It is no fun at all to have your carefully crafted text and deeply held opinions modified and attacked, but that's what you agree to when submitting - below every edit box is the text "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, do not submit it.". I get irritated by it at times, but normally just take a break and come back later. After all, I won't care in 500 years time. Regards,

2684:

temporary situation. Thereafter I had started to make some improvements, and as I wanted to save the already modified lead, I found JimWae's version had appeared for the third time, causing an edit conflict. Given the choice of throwing away my proper edits or copying my version in the 'top' window that appears upon an edit conflict, the choice was simple (one can always revert to something that was saved, can't one; whereas I try to improve articles by looking for sources before reinstating some statement or by adding something new thus I do not like to risk losing it and it deserves to become saved so that others can see it). That still makes 0 reverts at that time.

2175:- then your position will be adequately documented in a neutral point of view manner. I presume/assume that the Kenyan and Japanese national bodies are experts in reading and contributing to ISO standards, so they really ought to know if something is normative or not. I agree with you that the article is a bit of a dog's breakfast at present, but that doesn't mean parts should simply be excised - a rewrite, preserving all the verified facts could/should be undertaken, but doing it in a manner that does not bring accusations of bias would be difficult. Once OOXML is accepted or rejected as an ISO standard, I'm sure the article will improve radically. 1412:, so some way of making the cable system's article name unique was required. If you look at the category in which the cable systems are entered, it then becomes very messy, so in the interests of readability of the category, every cable system was suffixed with "(cable system)", with redirects. SEA-ME-WE 4 has (or should have) redirects from SMW4, SMW-4, SEA-ME-WE 4, SEA-ME-WE4. Where possible, the article should be titled with the official name of the cable system (where that can be determined), suffixed with (cable system). It also makes life easier when searching for a cable system using the Knowledge (XXG) search function. Hope that helps. 1913:

like me saying better is point-of-view when it's actually on a scale of much better, better, similar, worse. In point of fact, reading the reference, we'd do better to refer to the papers referenced by Dr. Robinson - specifically "Soulodre, G. A.; Grusec, T.; Lavoie, M.; and Thibault, L. (1998).; Subjective Evaluation of State-of-the-Art Two-Channel Audio Codecs.; Journal of the Audio Engineering Society, vol. 46, no. 3, Mar., pp. 164-177.", and maybe using the quality scale described as " 1. Imperceptible 2. Not annoying 3. Slightly annoying 4. Annoying 5. Very Annoying" (having read the paper, you'll know what I mean)

1453:) Non-IUPAC formulae can be used (and often are) but reference works are always based on the IUPAC names, with separate index entries (redirects) for non-IUPAC names. Similarly, Knowledge (XXG) benefits from having standard and consistent naming conventions. A good example here is the naming convention in use for London Underground stations, whereby the article name is the offical name of the station, suffixed by "tube station", which effectively differentiates the station from the area in which it is found or other ambiguous uses of the name. See 1118:. Note that it can be a disaster if nobody is killed. I do not consider the London bombings to be a disaster - they were a deliberate, premeditated set of events which were not disastrous in their effect - other than perhaps on people's civil liberties in the UK. If you feel the change I made was wrong, feel free to put it back in - I won't revert you. In my view, using terms stronger than is justified debases the language. Your view could, of course, be different - and it's a good thing that we have a diversity of views. Regards, 1733:, because the direct link you've provided doesn't provide a breakdown of the bit rates used around the world, whereas the page linked to on my website does. You've also removed the comment about music stations being transmitted in mono, and in my experience people think is a very serious issue. And I disagree with what you say about there being a trade-off due to FM's reception quality at high speed, because that doesn't take into account people listening at home. 169:

it is. I now feel like a maniac, with my usually against-the-tide comments and votes in various areas. Every once in a while, someone tries to pat me on the head and go, yes, I know, it can be frustrating, but you'll get over it. Really! (Sorry, I'm not trying to commiserate with you or anything. Just recognizing your fine tagging proposal, and also the fact that you're trying to get it noticed. This is not (meant to be) a pat on the head. :) --

3472: 3351: 2969: 3157: 21: 2392: 415:"A flop is a picture that mirror reverses the original scene. Some flops are reversed copies. For instance, mirror reversal is systematic with technologies that require contact between a template and an imprint surface. Other flops are just pictures that have undergone the operation of flopping. For example, a slide that is inserted backwards into a projector is a flop." 273:! I hope (FOR YOUR SAKE!) that you were just kidding!! (maybe you were just drowsy!) The problem is, forget about nations different from the U.S. or the UK for a moment. Let's face the facts---we can't put Canadian English, Australian English, etc. on the same level as British and American. (Let alone non-native English speakers.) If you didn't yet, please read 3072: 2806: 1335:(In the case of Microsoft vs. Open Source pages I think the problem is particularly acute because by definition "one side" of the story is unpaid and thus does not fall under the COI guidelines -- if we were to ban employees, say, from editing pages, we would end up with a net POV slanted towards open source.) 1752:. The Knowledge (XXG) attribution guidelines mean that referring to your own web-site as a source is not really on, even if it has (in your opinion) good information in it. Sorry, but that's the way the cookie crumbles. If you can refer to a good source that is not controlled by you, that would be best. 2170:

hAl - just linking to the national bodies replies is not sufficient to bring out the salient points of their submissions - it is reasonable to add important summary points in the article, of which the Kenyan objection is one such point. Your opinion is that their objection is incorrect, I reserve my

1015:

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work.

480:

as basic transforms, and the reasons why they are used. Flopping is used a great deal more than flipping, for obvious reasons - but there are still many photographers that prefer to work with flipped images for composition purposes so that they are less likely to be affected by the content of images

2297:

to Featured List status at present, and Lord McIntosh is proving a bit of a problem for me, as I can't find out (a) when he graduated (I assume 1954, after matriculation in 1951, but I need a reference) (b) what his degree subject was! Who's Who doesn't help me and nothing shows up on Google of any

2226:

I just looked at the sites which reference those links as you can see in the google example. It seems a bit of a strategy of the anti OOXML lobby to get their readers to massivly go after the ISO committees as they did during the 30 days contradictions period (even publisihing the mailadresen of the

2092:

All responses are already mentioned and referenced together in the critisism. Why seems this more important to you ???? This one seems disputable and it's source is very dubious. It isn't verifiable in an independant source like a vendor wh o has problems implemting OOXML because of these references

2052:

How is it "fairly clear" that IBM wrote the Kenyan response? That is a strong accusation that needs good backup. Author names in metadata are not fairly clear evidence of this. Suggestive of sloppy document handling procedures, certainly, but not clear evidence of authorship. I myself have used old

1803:

All I did was go through the Wohnort DAB website and count up the number of stations at different bit rate levels in each country and tabulate the results. The reference is merely backing up the claim that "the vast majority of stations" are using low bit rate levels. You don't need expert knowledge

2343:

are the same use a scheme where each byte has to have its start and end 'flagged' - the so-called start- and stop- bits, and sometimes add a parity bit as well - so to transport an eight bit byte over a low speed modem, you may have to send one (or even two) start bits, a parity bit, the eight bits

2212:

Hi hAl - "It seems those sites are only used by the anti ooxml lobby to influence ISO standardisation" - I don't think that is correct - the ANSI site seems to be receiving rather a lot of form letters in support of OOXML, and I have deliberately not commented on that, despite the fact that some of

2145:

You say "All responses are already mentioned and referenced together in the critisism, was slightly misleading". No it wasn't. I was just wrong about the location of the mentioning of the raised objections and the reference link. It is in the standardization section. So now there are objectiones to

2122:

So saying "All responses are already mentioned and referenced together in the critisism." was slightly misleading - as the late Kurt Vonnegut would say, "So, it goes". The point is that whether or not Kenya are correct, the objection was made, which is noteworthy, and referenceable to unimpeachable

2066:

You are seeing conspiracy where it could easily be explained by incompetence. It is not unreasonable for national body members to solicit input from people far and wide, and such input need not be public. It would be good if it were, but we can't have everything. It would be unreasonable to expect

1974:

Well, that is your prerogative. Working with people (and educating them) is, in my opinion, preferable. You do not need to accept demonstrably untrue assertions in the article. The trick is showing they are (verifiably, from good (perhaps unimpeachable) sources) that the assertion is untrue, and

1759:

Referring to your own website is either allowed or it is not, and if it is not then provide a reference to where it says so, otherwise the reference to the page I'm referring to should stay, because the reference was to back up the claim that the vast majority of stations in the countries mentioned

1728:

Hi. I'm not having a go at you, because you don't have an axe to grind here, and you've been fair up to now, but I have to say that I disagree with some of the changes you've made in the DAB page intro. Firstly, I think it's wrong to say that DAB only sounds worse than FM on a hi-fi system, because

1544:

Hello, I thank you for you concern that I am a minor and that I am sharing this, but I do not particularly mind giving some personal information. I have my reasons, but I do not really feel like telling them, as it would take too long and you can easily disagree. Please respect my choice to share

168:

Great and simple idea. It could also be used to filter for stubs, POV tags, clean-up tags,... But there are a lot of...ownership issues with many things around, it seems. I accidentally went behind the curtain last November, from my normal editing pastime, and what a turbulent and territorial place

2325:

So do you know in what instances there are 10 bits in a byte? I think I might have incorrectly changed a couple of the entries, because I'm not entirely sure if there are start/stop bits used for internal computer peripheral communications like SAS and SATA. It doesn't make sense that SAS would be

2245:

The BSI site is open for public reading, not writing, and makes instructive reading. I think they are working towards making constructive suggestions about OOXML. I agree that the comments submitted to ANSI appear somewhat partisan - but perhaps the low quality of the majority of submissions may

2127:

added the objections in - that way you are liable to get text that is not biased towards an ODF-supporters view of the world. You may see that I've been trying to get it recognised that Sun's OpenDocument Patent Statement is not as clear-cut as people assume, but making little headway, apart from

1495:

be renamed to end in '(footballer)'?" - Yes. Or probably "(association football player)" to indicate the difference with American Football players. The policy you reference also says "Following consistent conventions in both naming and linking makes it more likely that links will lead to the right

1154:

Hi, I closed up the MFDs and speedied the now-transwikied subpages you had for the lists of English language idioms. Thanks for doing all that work! Since your subpages were not the original text with the original attribution, they have been safely deleted. I wasn't sure what you wanted to do with

402:

Flopping can be regarded as a basic image transform, along with flipping (a mirror image across a horizontal axis) and cropping, all of which can easily be done physically with a photographic negative in a darkroom. More sophisticated transforms are usually achieved via digital image manipulation.

348:

Thanks, more or less same thoughts as I had. I asked around in telecom newsgroup at the time just in case there was someone with local experience. There are more accessible beaches suitable to bring a cable ashore on shorter routes. I must put the pictures on my website. The cable comes up the

246:

Still foolin' around. Darn it, this spat is way time- & energy-consuming. This morning I was supposed to do much more than bickering with Mark the Aussie---we're quite a duo, huh? If you followed our wrangle (and if you did, that would mean you were not that busy :-)... well, don't tell me you

2653:

Hey WLD! I honestly didn't know that it was microwave... I saw that TBL went from Albania to Italy and assumed it followed the cable that exists between those two. Do you have a source that explains the microwave capacity? I would be most interested... and we can remove from the sub cable list. I

2503:

Your revert is well intentioned as well. However, some of your edits in this article do not follow conventions of Knowledge (XXG). For example, the external link titled "The first company in the world to produce reflective road markers." should be labeled as the company to which it points. The

1912:

So it's differences in sound quality. Rather than the bald 'better', why not say "better, as described in the study documented in comments submitted to OFCOM by Dr David J M Robinson, Department of Electronic Systems Engineering, University of Essex,on 9th July 2002. A bit OTT, but stops people

1431:

No, it wouldn't be simpler - the category listing becomes extremely messy that way. It is not simply a disambiguation issue - it is also about having consistent article names - and consistency in use is an extremely important feature of any reference work. Redirects from non-canonical names to a

1421:

Would it be simpler if the cables which need disambiguation, have disambiguation, and the ones which don't need it, don't have it? Knowledge (XXG) disambiguation conventions are standard across the whole project - there have been cases in the past where individual WikiProject have unsuccessfully

294:

Noticed your interest in "Cable landing points". I wonder if you come across the site at Scad Head on Hoy in the Orkneys? Five cables come ashore to a small hut near an old WWII gun battery. I asked around after visiting the site for any information on the site but did not get any satisfactory

3250:

and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the

2687:

JimWae's version handles the fanatic Christians' many viewpoints comprehensively and inappropriately from the first part of the lead onwards, while pro-BCE viewpoints are largely destroyed. That violates the WP NPOV policy that should outweigh the 3-revert rule. But usually admins are not paying

2412:

I noticed that with a few of his maps versus the actual carrier/provider detail. I go with what the carrier/provider says. When I get a lot of this put in place, you'll have to let me know an email or such to contact you, if you are interested in the data. Put together from public sources, it is

2267:

I like the BSI link a whole lot more, allthough when I saw that the first two issues it raised are about changing the name of the format and rewriting the whole spec based on the ODF spec which was like reading grokdoc I was not to impressed by it. But it also does raise a good number of content

2112:

The critisism about the wmf and clipboard format used to be amongst the critisims in the critisism section however when a cleanup was made in the list to keep more or less serieus issues as a less relevant issues I think it was removed as there wasn't any serieus party stating you require those

1964:

I made a large concession by changing something to a version that I thought was untrue (i.e. moved the version towards what he wanted) just to stop the reversion war, and that nutter just changed it to his preferred version yet again. So I'm afraid he burnt his bridges, and I'm having absolutely

1342:

page (a guideline I'd never noticed before in years of editing) and tried to make some edits to make this clear. These were quickly reverted, but there is now at least a discussion of sorts on the talk page. The basic problem is that the editors on that page believe pretty much that such editors

1083:

Hey there, thanks for the note. You had me worried that my UTF8 processing had a bug in it, but it turns out though that all I did was turn the HTML entity for that symbol into the UTF8 for symbol. The incorrect symbol was already being used by the editor who added it in the first place. Cheers,

738:

Note that my edition of the Shorter Oxford Dictionary gives the phrase as "Grand Panjandrum", but allows "Great Panjandrum" as also used. I've not found definitively which word Foote used, and I'm not sure there is an original text anyone can go back to - they will all be reports of the Macklin

2683:

I had clearly declared on the talk page that I intended to restore JimWae's edits gradually, but that such could not be done starting from his version because of the numerous broken paragraphs having made comparing versions from the article history impossible. Hence my first 'revert' was only a

1736:

If you're annoyed with me because I reverted something of yours last week, the reason I reverted it was because you had changed that Norwegian nutter's intro, and his intro is nonsense, so I felt that it was better to revert the whole lot. It was nothing against what you'd put, but his intro is

2370:

Hey there WLD! Been a while since we chatted. Yeah - I didn't know there was a way to do that, and didn't want the bad links to be out there for people (like me) to click on and not be able to use. I guess if I can see an example of how to label them, I will do so (to label them as formerly

2005:

Well, patience is a virtue. If you can demonstrate to admins that the other editor is being stubborn to the point of unreasonableness, blocks are possible. The main thing is to keep your cool. Violating the three-revert rule doesn't go down well. I'm sure the article can be improved with

2032:

It is not worth putting particular mentioning of this repsonse in the licensing section. all objections is already referencend in the critism section. Lifting out a pretty udbieus one like this seems not called for. there is absolutly not a single shred of other independant (as in non-IBM

1861:

That's your opinion - define 'better'. Someone with 'cloth ears' may well not perceive a difference. If you can define 'better' in measurable terms, then link to a verifiable source that shows the measured difference between FM and DAB, that's how it should be in the article. 'Better' is

2056:

Can you see a good reason why a Kenyan official would have the names of a German IBM employee who opposed OOXML in the German DIN iso national body and a Malaysian anti-OOXML opensource blogger in it's reponse on OOXML? documents which were not publicly publishedon the internet. Come on,

1267:

OK - sorry - me not understanding. The transwiki was a bit of a rush when the pages were originally ProDed/AfDed. I wasn't familiar with the arcana of Userspace, main page space, transwiki-ing and so forth, so it was a steep learning curve. I'm sure I still don't understand most of it.

1781:

which makes it clear that self-published sources are not acceptable. To make clear - if you have published in a recognised, peer reviewed academic journal (say), you can cite yourself in that, but not a self-published leaflet, website, or blog. I hope that makes things clear for you.

1590:

Thanks - I've been trying to educate the original author in Attribution and no Original reasearch , but making no headway, so I'm reviewing their entire history. I'm not even interested in Texas history! Unfortunately, there's lots of articles to review and try and salvage. Regards,

2102:

But the normative/non-normative issue is not mentioned in the criticism section. It is not disputable that Kenya have raised such an objection. The basis of the objection may be arguable - but that is a different point. And yes, the Japanese point should be raised in the article.

1747:

You are right that I have no particular axe to grind. However, I see many reverts in the DAB article, which are not really improving the quality, so I'm trying to break out of that cycle. I disagree strongly with the use of weasel words, so I'm happy with declarative statements,

2691:

It can be proven that Jimwae very intendedly used a technical process of eliminating proper and very notable sources and the statements these had corroborated in a well camouflaged manner, as I partially demonstrated on the article's talk page. That intend makes those edits

2941: 2595:

OK, I'm adding my tupp'orth to the discussion. I sincerely hope 69.73.191.92 does as well. I must admit I'm heartily tired of the edit warring that goes on around OOXML and ODF, and I'm looking forward to when the standardisation process is over (whatever the outcome).

2472: 367: 2213:

the blogs seem to do just that. Ideally, I'd have links to all the national bodies methods of soliciting input on this topic (maybe even as a sub-article) - unfortunately, I don't have that. Just linking to it in the article without comment strikes me to be neutral.

2193:

When searching for comments pages like that it show that those pages are only linked to from blogs of strong anti-ooxml sites like IBM's Rob Weirs blog, Grokdoc, noooxml.org and the Opendocumentfellowship who just want their readers to put in objections to ooxml.

2067:

members of a national body to work in a sealed box, with no input from outside. There is no doubt lobbying from many interested parties, so if someone decides to use input, fine. It's obviously preferable for it all to be open and above board, and I wish it were.

2688:

enough attention to a well-camouflaged POV turning of an article and only count 'reverts', I know. On his talk page, JimwWae had declared to rather prefer the BCE-CE notation, but his edits show he does much more than editing from the devil's advocate's viewpoint.

391:

I have never heard the term "flopping an image" before; a Google search for "flip an image" vs. "flop an image" (18,200 vs. 56), among other similar searches seems to confirm this. In fact, "flip an image horizontally" has more hits (187) than "flop an image".

123:

1632:

to Knowledge (XXG)'s inline reference format - I see you've put references in some other articles, and it would be good if you could use the format as in Vince's Bridge - it should make things easier! For more infoormation on the referencing method, see here:

789:

I wan't aware at the time when I first put the article together, but became aware later. I would argue against merging, otherwise, I'd have done so myself, but I'll try and find time to put together a cogent argument why on the article's discussion page.

2171:

position. However, the existence of the objection is verifiable, and as I have already pointed out in an edit comment, Knowledge (XXG) runs on verifiability, not truth. If you can reference a reliable source that contends Kenya is wrong, then do so

2572:

had already reverted the inclusion of the NoOOXML link three times when I gave the warning. I am very well aware of the 3RR policy, and will not revert the article again today. I am always happy to discuss issues on the talk page. Best regards,

550:; if you come across an article that is nothing more than a definition, see if there is information you can add that would be appropriate for an encyclopedia. An exception to this rule is for articles about the cultural meanings of individual 57:

I didn't know about the nor ruling, so I will publish the research on my personal web pages and x-ref from wikipedia. I must admit I was baffled and annoyed at the loss of my changes, but I now understand and apologise for using up your time.

2890: 1938:

It's also best not to refer to other editors as 'nutters' - there is a policy of assuming good faith - we really ought to be able to work together to produce a neutral article (detailing differences of opion as necessary). If the

1813:

I'd say to put the table into the article, document your method (as above), and give the references (already done). Still classifiable as original research, but would require a particularly obsessive admin/editor to remove that.

628:

Hey - thanks for the kudos on my maps. As far as the sub cable maps - consider it done, in between my military training (this weekend) and studying for my MBA (ongoing). I can probably get something up in the next two weeks. :)

193:

No - I just happen to live in the vicinity of their head office in Isleworth. When I looked up who they were on the Internet, I noticed there wasn't a Knowledge (XXG) entry, so created one. It's not very detailed, I'm afraid.

3197:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of 435::Reversing the direction. For example, if a photo or piece of artwork has an arrow which is pointing in a particular direction and you turn that piece of paper over so it is facing the other direction, it has been flopped." 1277:

It's not my specialty either, but from what I understand taking a capture of the edit history log and posting it on the talk page of the transwikied page seems to satisfy attribution requirements. For an example, see

1496:

place.", and having some article titles suffixed and others not is not consistent. Redirects are cheap, so having an article name without the suffix as a redirect to the canonical name is a clear solution. Regards,

1444:

method of naming organic chemicals: there are strict rules laid down about how to unambiguously name organic molecules, which lead to quite unwieldy canonical names, however, they are agreed and unambiguous. (See:

3305:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 779:? I have dropped a MERGE tag at the top of your article. Very good information in your article and it looks like it should just be merged into to the other article but will leave that up to others to decide. 2774: 2535:

If you could please put in your opinion at the talk page; we would like to have as many native-English speakers participate as possible. A certain user wants to revert back to a particular national POV.

3015:

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

776: 468:

No problem. Sorry if I came across as defensive. Victim of too many edit wars already. I probably need to do some major work on image transfoms anyway - there really ought to be an article on each of

1446: 2884: 2227:

ISO members. I'll leave the link in but I do have a lot of doubts about the commments that come in trought these sites (also the pro-ooxml comments as I expect those to be influenced by MS a lot..)

2781:, to which you have been a major contributor. I have a few concerns that should be addressed if the article is to remain listed as a GA. If you are able to help out, the reassessment can be found 1332:, that they are capable of valid, good faith edits and that it would be a net detriment to wikipedia if such editors were banned from editing and forced to simply post suggestions on a talk page. 748:

Well, "Great" in the heading here was just due to my lack of paying attention. I'm glad you pointed it out. Indeed, it's nice to know someone who has the OED (even the Shorter) at hand. Cheers!

2507:

Also, in the section "Pedestrian Crossing Studs," it is not clean to include links to a URL except as a citation. The link should be footnoted as a reference, not included as a "see: http..."

2550:

I am sorry, but I feel that the same warning should be applied to you. As far as I see, some people have been deleting that link, and as I see these external links sections, I would refer to

2996:

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

2136:. The point of that little aside is to make the point I am not blind to ODF's faults. Preferably, faults, errors, omissions, and so on in both ODF and OOXML can be identified and remedied. 1841:

between FM and DAB (and the effect of common degradations), and allow the reader to make up their own mind, or possibly read the results of valid tests. Referring people to the article on

2029:

It seem pretty clear the references Kenya mentiones are not normative references for OOXML. Also it seem fairly clear that Kenya has not written the objections reponse but IBM has.

1346:

My sense from your contributions to the Open Documents discussion is that you have similar feelings to mine. I think it would be a good idea for you to contribute your views at the

274: 248: 349:

beach encased in steel jackets bolted on to it, short sections about a foot or so long to allow a bit of movement. Not sure if these are standard or just used on military cables.

3591: 3586: 2294: 1070: 3219:

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Knowledge (XXG) to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you

658:

Good day! I'm working a bit of cleanup of Samuel Foote's article. I noticed that you added the section on the Great Panjandrum. Can you provide a source for this? Thanks!

2990: 600:

Due to the many AfDs which are initiated to enforce this policy and due to the resistance to such deletion by defenders of the glossaries, I have started a discussion at

76: 3377:

requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and

2754:

on en-wiki), but this is one of the most prominent articles in which this issue is of significance. Given your experience, your input would be very much appreciated.

2426: 1440:, and standard canonical formats are chosen to be unambiguous; otherwise reference works do not work at all. The best example of this I can think of at present is the 3036: 2202:

I do not think that such pages and the way they are abused by anti ooxml activists making them a promotional weapon for them should have place on wikipedia article.

1350:

page if you have the time. I don't usually like to "recruit" people, but the essential problem is that the editors currently feel that "consensus" is on their side.

1204:

Pages which have formerly been in a different namespace and moved to a subpage of the user namespace may not be deleted in this way. These must be listed either at

481:

they are working with - looking at an upside-down image means you are more concerned about the overall composition of the picture than what the subject looks like.

3031:

in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

3132: 739:

event where the nonsense prose was extemporised. As the Oxford Dictionaries record usage, and are not prescriptive, I hazard that Grand is the more usual usage.

2199:

It seems those sites are only used by the anti ooxml lobby to influence ISO standardisation rather than being a place for objective commenting on the standard.

312:

My theory is that the gun batteries were interconnected by submarine cables and the GPO reused some after WWII for telephone communications between the islands.

2982:. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Knowledge (XXG) policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the 1114:

They didn't die, and in any case 40 people dying is not a disaster, except for the relatives and friends of the people concerned. Take a look at the article on

2344:

of the byte, and the stop bit. Usually, the scheme is one start, one stop and no parity, giving 10 buts. Other buses use a different encoding scheme such as

2326:

different than SATA and they originally were posted as being different (SATA was 8 and SAS was 10). Also what about PCI buses? Should PCI Expess really be 10?

1292: 1262: 1179: 525: 3228: 2290: 3224: 2905: 1777:- note that in the latter "make sure ... that you're regarded as a reliable source for the purposes of Knowledge (XXG)". Reliable source policy is here: 209:

That was a very good edit adding lots of understandable information about how the leaders and family members were viewed and respected by others. Mark in

2872: 2818: 2057:

Seriously ????? Either IBM wrote the Keynyan reponse directly or they mayby they send prefabricated reponses to sevral multiple national bodies even...

601: 501: 2853: 2146:

OOXML mentioned in the standardization section, the licensing section and the critisism section. It is ridiculous to see for an encyclopedic article.

1386:, and I'm not sure why a specific convention would be required in the first place. I was going to move them back, since there is nothing else called 3549: 3432: 3370: 3146: 3096: 237:

Thank you so much for your mediation, WLD. Some judgment was called for and, luckily, many people out there can still use their sense. Thanks again,

1000: 2586:), but I moved both sections to the talkpage, and added my view. I hope for discussion there first. IMHO, both sections should completely go. -- 1450: 2246:

spur others to make better quality comments/submissions. I hope we can find similar insights into the workings of the other national committees.

504:. I've placed the following neutral language announcement and statement of the issue at the talk page of all the slang glossaries I could find: 876: 604:

to rewrite the policy in order to solve this problem and to readdress this question: should slang glossaries by allowed on Knowledge (XXG)? --

2517:

Sorry about that. When I get a decent hunk of time to review, I'll try and get the pieces you mention to conform more closely to guidelines.

618:

Cheers! Hey - good point, I will edit the Vanco list to include only those places where we have offices/subsidiaries. That cool with you? :)

2866: 1729:

DAB sounds worse than FM in general, and you can hear the difference on portable radios. I also don't see why you've removed the link to the

821: 3330: 3232: 1209: 2862: 2696:, regardless his idea of what belongs in the article or not. Whether such intend would by the average admin-at-the-job be recognized as 1454: 866: 35:. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. 1559:

Sure. Your choice, and I'm not going to impose on you. Other people are more assertive in trying to prevent minors self-identifying.

579:

Knowledge (XXG) is not in the business of saying how words, idioms, etc. should be used. We aren't teaching people how to talk like a

3553: 3436: 3374: 3040:

involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by

2979: 1863: 1205: 1095: 425:

also uses the term 'flop' extensively. It's certainly used as jargon in image manipulation and advertising - see the glossary here

3019:

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (

2912: 1774: 1770: 3099:

to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources:

2504:

statement that it is the first company seems to be significant, so it really should be more detailed in the body of the article.

2036:

I have not heard a single OO vendor or other office builder say that related format licensing does not allow them to use OOXML.

891: 886: 769: 1474:

be renamed to end in "(footballer)"? I understand the IUPAC naming system but Knowledge (XXG) already has a set of agreed upon

27: 3326: 2195: 1244:

Since you didn't have the original pages with the full GFDL page history in your userspace, db-owner would still apply to your

3166: 1475: 1383: 42: 2835: 564:

consisting of pointers to other pages; these are used to clarify differing meanings of a word. Knowledge (XXG) also includes

330: 3541: 3483: 3461: 3424: 3362: 3340: 2940:

The page "Knowledge (XXG) talk:What Knowledge (XXG) is not/Candidate lists to be migrated to Wiktionary" has been moved to "

2082:

In my opinion, it is worth mentioning. Whether it is an issue or not remains to be seen as the ISO standard review goes on.

3263: 1101:"Without wishing to be insensitive, I really don't think that two people dying in a road accident constitute a disaster." 977: 210: 3545: 3428: 3252: 2878: 1866:. Personally, I think you are probably correct - but that is my opinion, and I can't back it up from verifiable sources. 451:

Thank you (I wasn't trying to contradict you, I was just trying to learn where the terminology came from. Now I know).

87:

Thanks for your comments on my draft proposal. Your idea has merit also. I'm just not sure Wikipedians are ready for it.

2482:

For your huge help with updating the international submarine cable list and populating the domestic submarine cable list

1492: 1471: 3317:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3212: 3092: 2983: 2623: 1580:

I changed your copyright violation to a speedy delete. This was a blatant word for word plagiarism. Just a heads-up.

1213: 160:

The reason for the difference in the number of beers is that the Brits are piss artists and the Yanks are sensible :-)

3322: 3126: 1061:

recently, and put in the incorrect unicode symbol for indicating a chemical equilibrium. It should be ⇌ which is: {{

780: 3503: 3173: 1996:

I've tried educating him, but he doesn't understand the technology, so there's absolutely no getting through to him.

1156: 1104:

About 40 people were injured. If everyone on the cach had died, it would have been worse than the London Bombings --

561: 2743: 1379: 2039:

There seems some valid critisism on OOXML (like using bitmask or somthing) but this issue seems just a non-issue.

1778: 1272: 1239: 2528: 1887:

References 2 and 3 refer to the difference in sound quality between DAB and FM, and they're from expert sources.

1570: 1321: 108: 2381:

I don't mind at all... in fact, I will go back and see how you did so to ensure I do the same in the future! :)

352:

Would like to get to see the old TAT-1 repeater station at Oban but it is in a private estate unfortunately. --

3104: 2843: 2790: 2631: 2597: 2574: 2518: 2357: 2311: 2247: 2214: 2176: 2137: 2104: 2083: 2068: 2007: 1976: 1952: 1914: 1867: 1815: 1783: 1642: 1592: 1577: 1560: 1530: 1497: 1458: 1413: 1269: 1236: 1119: 1074: 1035: 791: 740: 712: 482: 443: 338: 223: 195: 2825:

policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure

2133: 2093:

or an indepent laywer. Also for instance the Japanese reponse also deals with licensing but is not mentioned.

1479: 407: 2664:

ACK! I was working on TBL when trying to discuss the other one. Yes, I believe it is a mistake! Bullocks! :)

1760:

are using insufficient bit rate levels, which is exactly the information provided on the page on my website.

2627: 928: 544: 3190: 3080: 2310:

Sorry, no idea. Apologies for the delay in replying - for some reason I missed seeing your message to me.

2166:

The article mentions the responses of the national bodies and has a link to reference all those responses.

1312:

I've been following (and partially contributing) to the discussion of the whole "Microsoft edits" issue on

2606: 2569: 2053:

documents as templates for new ones without clearing the metadata. Not good practice, but I'm only human.

1645: 951: 831: 3557: 3440: 3369:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing

3318: 3236: 3108: 1668: 1638: 1196: 2508: 2302: 2132:

agreeing that the issue was raised earlier, but with no citation as to the correct interpretation - see

1997: 1966: 1888: 1853: 1805: 1761: 1738: 1672: 1655: 3088: 3079:, has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Knowledge (XXG)'s 2830: 1324:) is that while such folks can be tedious at times and definitely need to be "educated" on things like 683: 295:

answers . There was relatively modern BT equipment in the hut though I suspect no longer operational.

1400:

Thanks for querying - some cable systems share abbreviations or names with other things: for example,

1390:

that the cable system would get mixed up with, but thought I would check with you first. Regards, --

305:

It is an awkward site for access with no road just a quarter mile(?) walk down the old cableway route.

41:

Hi. I'm surprised no one has yet welcomed you to Knowledge (XXG). So, welcome! You might want to read

3227:. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see 3020: 2949: 1024: 969: 933: 896: 3294: 3285: 2826: 2555: 2298:

use. Do you happen to know of a source with these details? Bit of a long shot, I know... Regards,

1343:

should be banned, should be forced to seek permission from other editors, or something of the sort.

146:

was my first Knowledge (XXG) article, and I was surprised how quickly it was found by someone else.

3056: 2898: 2786: 1605: 1581: 1288: 1258: 1175: 826: 334: 288: 3528: 3499: 3314: 3298: 3023:). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was 2942:

User:West London Dweller/What Knowledge (XXG) is not-Candidate lists to be migrated to Wiktionary

2759: 1359: 756: 729: 666: 565: 3491: 3251:

speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

3084: 3041: 2558:. Both part of policy. For you both, discuss on talkpage in stead of keeping on reverting. -- 1519:

Apologies - thank you for the instant rebuttal. I didn't notice that! Just getting used to AWB.

640:

I fleshed out the company history and added the logo. Let me know if you see any discrepancies!

2833:. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2356:. So, it is not always correct to simply divied the 'raw' bandwidth by eight. Hope that helps. 1235:

finished with them yet, as they act as a reminder to do some work in Wiktionary. Thanks again.

721:

Thank you for your quick response! I'll add the citation. You've been most helpful! Take care!

587:

to describe just how a word is used to distinguish among similar, easily confused ideas, as in

3566: 3524: 3449: 3407: 3386: 3271: 3114: 2926: 2613:. Is there any policy on Knowledge (XXG) regarding people connecting from an anonymous proxy? 2269: 2228: 2203: 2147: 2114: 2094: 2058: 2040: 1944: 1634: 1437: 1313: 1225: 1189: 1163: 1141: 964: 426: 353: 320: 75:

You might be interested in my draft proposal about reviewed articles. It's near the bottom of

3479: 3465: 3382: 3378: 3310: 3302: 1329: 1325: 1316:. My own experience with editors who have "conflicts of interest" (on very different topics: 3001: 2679:

Thanks for the three revert warning on my talk page, but I do not think it applies because:

2353: 2299: 1948: 1382:

a while back, referring to the standard naming for cable systems. I can't find anything on

1062: 906: 841: 605: 477: 62: 3511: 3495: 3394: 3313:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3306: 3194: 3186: 2822: 2810: 2583: 2551: 1347: 1339: 329:

Hello Jmb - no I hadn't come across Scad Head. I'm confining my interest to international

2975: 2960: 2945: 2537: 1842: 1730: 1629: 1520: 1137: 1039: 959: 911: 836: 805: 693: 678: 551: 423: 371: 278: 260: 238: 213: 1284: 1254: 1212:. On the other hand, if you'd just like them to be moved back, then by all means ask at 1171: 595:. In some special cases an article about an essential piece of slang may be appropriate. 3411: 3052: 3048: 2782: 2705: 2665: 2655: 2486: 2456: 2443: 2433: 2414: 2400: 2382: 2372: 1105: 1028: 871: 688: 641: 630: 619: 404: 184: 112: 3510:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be

3393:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, pages may be

3185:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

1837:

a matter of opinion, and should be described as such. The article should describe the

3580: 3209:. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators 3137: 3120: 2755: 2587: 2559: 1547: 1085: 941: 749: 722: 659: 473: 469: 88: 80: 46: 3572: 3455: 3334: 3279: 3140: 3060: 3005: 2953: 2930: 2794: 2763: 2732: 2668: 2658: 2634: 2617: 2600: 2590: 2577: 2562: 2540: 2521: 2511: 2489: 2459: 2446: 2436: 2417: 2403: 2385: 2375: 2360: 2314: 2304: 2272: 2250: 2231: 2217: 2206: 2179: 2150: 2140: 2117: 2107: 2097: 2086: 2071: 2061: 2043: 2033:

related)material supporting that you require licensing of other formats for OOXML.

2010: 2000: 1979: 1969: 1955: 1917: 1891: 1870: 1856: 1818: 1808: 1786: 1764: 1741: 1715: 1706: 1696: 1675: 1658: 1608: 1595: 1584: 1563: 1553: 1533: 1523: 1500: 1486: 1478:

which state to use the simplest or most common unambiguous name. Would a name like

1461: 1426: 1416: 1394: 1364: 1279: 1144: 1122: 1108: 1088: 1077: 1042: 794: 783: 759: 743: 732: 715: 669: 644: 633: 622: 608: 485: 455: 446: 396: 378: 356: 341: 323: 281: 263: 247:

forgot to laugh. Back to more serious topics, if you've got the time, check out the

241: 226: 216: 198: 187: 173: 128: 65: 3562: 3445: 3256: 2993:

until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

2922: 2725: 2129: 1712: 1703: 1693: 1005: 651: 539:, please do not create an entry merely to define a term. An article should usually 170: 2442:

Great work with helping flesh out the article - within a day the list is HUGE! :)

2997: 2729: 2614: 2471: 1940: 1387: 1375: 1354: 995: 987: 901: 851: 316: 2391: 1249: 284:

Oh yea, just try to tell Ben Arnold that New Zealand speaks British English...

2839:

article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the

1130: 1058: 1048: 881: 846: 547: 536: 452: 393: 125: 20: 3358: 3344: 3027:. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to 2335:

There are usually eight bits in a byte, but the low speed modems, where the

1483: 1433: 1423: 1401: 1391: 1248:

copies. Wiktionary should have a copy of the original contribution list per

111:. I wonder what the reaction would be if I added a "symbol rate" column ? -- 3047:

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of

308:

Other points with easy road access and short cable route to the main island

3534:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

3417:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing

406:

for an example where both terms are used, and the ref in the article here

3165:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

2336: 1115: 3502:

shows few mentions in passing/press-releases/routine business-as-usual.

2805: 2330:

Sorry for the delay in replying - I've been somewhat busy in real life.

1159:, etc, but if you want those deleted too, the quick way is to place the 808:

predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

3301:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

3076: 3011:

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

1779:

Knowledge (XXG):Verifiability#Self-published sources (online and paper)

1140:

about whether the "Common Era" article should use US or UK spelling. --

1016:

Your contributions make Knowledge (XXG) better -- thanks for helping.

946: 923: 698: 592: 580: 3242:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

3193:

infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from

3075:

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote,

2709: 1654:

Ok I'm still learning and just didn't know how to do it but now I see

1409: 1405: 588: 3083:. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be 2809:

Hello West London Dweller! Thank you for your contributions. I am a

2775:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force

1935:

Sorry about removing the point about mono - that wasn't intentional.

1852:

No, if there's good reception on both DAB and FM, FM sounds better.

1689: 1208:, or if they were not found originally in the article namespace, at 1034:

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on

684:

http://dictionary.reference.com/wordoftheday/archive/2004/11/23.html

1457:. I don't understand why you would not wish to use such a method. 1185:

Thank-you for deleting those pages. I deliberately didn't use the

302:

It is not the most convenient point to link Hoy to the main island.

3247: 3182: 3150: 2778: 2390: 2349: 1690:

http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:MSTCrow#Compact_Fluorescent_Lamp

1441: 982: 2742:

Might I ask you to take a look at the new discussion going on at

2113:

formats for implementing OOOXML let alone need a license for it.

1221:

So I was trying to follow the rules. I'm more than happy to put

602:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:What Knowledge (XXG) is not#Slang glossaries

502:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:What Knowledge (XXG) is not#Slang glossaries

500:

I've started over from scratch and have posted a new proposal at

2712: 2626:, motivated in part by the the problem of vandalism coming from 2345: 2340: 1317: 861: 856: 143: 139: 777:

Timeline of telescopes, observatories, and observing technology

2455:

I updated the map on the right - shows the world view now! :)

1447:

International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry nomenclature

528:

or a usage or jargon guide. Knowledge (XXG) articles are not:

15: 183:

I noticed the page on Vanco. Very cool. Are you an employee?

3470: 3349: 3223:

verify that externally by one of the processes explained at

3155: 2700:, allowing more than three reverts, might be another matter. 1862:

point-of-view biased, and another Knowledge (XXG) policy is

2978:, which you created or to which you contributed, should be 2610: 2432:

Followed your advice, if you can add more please do so! :)

2049:

It is not "pretty clear" (see, I can assert things as well)

3044:). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note. 2630:

users. Not sure if anything is actually in place, though.

2399:

Oh, and I'm making a lot of progress on sub cable maps :)

775:

Hi, are you aware that there is already an article called

100:

I responded on my talk page. ] 16:53, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)

2123:

sources. The same applies to Japan. It would be best if

1374:

Hi there, I noticed you moved some articles, for example

3195:

https://www.linkedin.com/pub/pavlina-tomasova/3a/191/a92

2654:

appreciate you and I helping each other, by the way! :)

1951:, we ought to be able to do the same on the DAB article. 259:, and put in your $ 0.02... um, £0.02. Thanks as usual, 3552:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

3435:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

1750:

so long as they are adequately and verifiably backed up

1038:. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- 694:

http://www.cs.rice.edu/~ssiyer/minstrels/poems/208.html

679:

http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/panjandrum?view=uk

3517:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

3400:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

2897: 1071:

Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Chemicals/Style guidelines

249:

Talk:List of words mainly used in Commonwealth English

3189:, because the article or image appears to be a clear 2991:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Floating breech

77:

Knowledge (XXG) talk:Forum for Encyclopedic Standards

31:. West London Dweller has not edited Knowledge (XXG) 2295:

List of people associated with Jesus College, Oxford

1604:♦LOL I hear ya....Good luck...and ahve a great day. 1023:

on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on

689:

http://www.worldwidewords.org/weirdwords/ww-pan2.htm

510:

Attention: Slang Glossary policy discussion underway

138:

Thank you for cleaning up my Wiki article entitled "

2911: 1775:

Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest#Citing oneself

1771:

Knowledge (XXG):No original research#Citing oneself

2817:of the articles that you created is tagged as an 2777:, I have conducted a Good Article reassessment of 3293:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 2974:A discussion has begun about whether the article 315:You might be interested in a friend's website on 3034:For established users such as yourself there is 2427:List of domestic submarine communications cables 801:Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot 3229:Knowledge (XXG):Requesting copyright permission 3187:section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion 3163: 515:Slang glossaries violate the following policy: 3225:Knowledge (XXG):Donating copyrighted materials 1833:The as for what sounds better or worse - that 1309:Dear WLD, Doc0tis, hAl, Gazpacho and BCube -- 2190:I saw you linked to the ANSI comments page. 107:Thank you for adding the bit/s column to the 8: 3592:Wikipedians who opt out of template messages 3371:Knowledge (XXG):General notability guideline 2724:Michael Busch has requested a straw poll of 1305:working on "Conflict of Interest" guidelines 583:chimney-sweep. However, it may be important 319:if you are interested in submarine cables -- 3587:Wikipedians who opt out of message delivery 1073:Other Topics - Special Symbols - Arrows. - 403:(Quoted from article) - see this page here 3136:. Thank you for editing Knowledge (XXG)! 1468:"category listing becomes extremely messy" 233:Hassling & Harassing, or Vandals, Inc. 3253:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 3233:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 2854:David Stoddart, Baron Stoddart of Swindon 2819:Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person 2006:consensus, even if it does take a while. 585:in the context of an encyclopedia article 1001:Demographic history of the United States 3523:notice, but please explain why in your 3406:notice, but please explain why in your 3167:the guide to writing your first article 2466: 1451:IUPAC nomenclature of organic chemistry 28:This user may have left Knowledge (XXG) 2728:. You may want to add your comments. 877:Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute 3563:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 3446:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 3375:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (software) 2829:, all biographies should be based on 2609:comes from an anonymous proxy called 2134:Talk:OpenDocument#Sun's Patent Pledge 1864:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view 822:Navy Prototype Optical Interferometer 7: 3235:for more details, or ask a question 1470:doesn't really work - should all of 1169:template on them. Happy editing! -- 699:http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/18417 3172:You may want to consider using the 1965:nothing to do with him since that. 1623: 1455:List of London Underground stations 867:Grand Interferometre a 2 Telescopes 526:Knowledge (XXG) is not a dictionary 520:Knowledge (XXG) is not a dictionary 3512:deleted for any of several reasons 3486:because of the following concern: 3395:deleted for any of several reasons 3365:because of the following concern: 1384:Knowledge (XXG):Naming conventions 711:Panjandrum, not Great Panjandrum. 14: 3319:review the candidates' statements 2989:The article will be discussed at 1628:I've converted the references in 1540:Re:Self-identification as a minor 1197:Knowledge (XXG):User_page#Removal 1150:"List of idioms" subpages deleted 1096:2007 National Express coach crash 810: 535:Because Knowledge (XXG) is not a 3070: 2967: 2804: 2470: 1671:, did I do the references right? 1529:No problem - glad I could help. 892:Isaac Newton Group of Telescopes 887:Infrared Optical Telescope Array 770:Timeline of telescope technology 61:Thanks for the follow-up hints. 19: 3066:Article notability notification 2624:Knowledge (XXG):No open proxies 1214:Knowledge (XXG):Requested moves 1157:User:West London Dweller/Idioms 568:for various specialized fields. 331:submarine communications cables 3325:. For the Election committee, 3295:Arbitration Committee election 3286:ArbCom elections are now open! 2733:00:24, 28 September 2007 (UTC) 1422:tried to create their own. -- 275:the sense of the move proposal 156:British/American beer drinkers 1: 3335:12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 3280:18:11, 18 December 2014 (UTC) 2954:17:22, 15 November 2010 (UTC) 2823:biographies of living persons 2764:01:39, 21 December 2007 (UTC) 2750:an ancient topic (the use of 2669:15:37, 7 September 2007 (UTC) 2659:13:43, 7 September 2007 (UTC) 2635:07:43, 7 September 2007 (UTC) 2622:There's a proposed policy of 2618:13:13, 6 September 2007 (UTC) 2601:18:04, 3 September 2007 (UTC) 2591:17:19, 3 September 2007 (UTC) 2578:17:16, 3 September 2007 (UTC) 2563:17:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC) 1501:11:32, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1487:10:59, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1462:09:48, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1427:08:59, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 1417:10:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 1395:05:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 978:Aberration in optical systems 795:18:01, 21 November 2006 (UTC) 784:17:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC) 211:Historic Triangle of Virginia 3573:05:41, 29 October 2019 (UTC) 3231:. You might want to look at 3176:to help you create articles. 3006:23:41, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 2931:06:45, 17 January 2010 (UTC) 2795:15:43, 29 October 2008 (UTC) 1365:00:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC) 1293:17:59, 24 January 2007 (UTC) 1273:16:33, 24 January 2007 (UTC) 1263:15:47, 24 January 2007 (UTC) 1240:11:07, 24 January 2007 (UTC) 1231:on what remains - I haven't 1180:23:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC) 1145:20:48, 22 January 2007 (UTC) 1129:English language variant in 1123:09:37, 18 January 2007 (UTC) 1109:21:30, 17 January 2007 (UTC) 1089:21:09, 6 December 2006 (UTC) 1078:10:16, 6 December 2006 (UTC) 1043:06:48, 4 December 2006 (UTC) 760:01:40, 8 November 2006 (UTC) 744:23:59, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 733:20:58, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 716:20:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 670:17:33, 7 November 2006 (UTC) 645:15:38, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 634:14:12, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 623:13:53, 13 October 2006 (UTC) 253:(Yet Another) Requested Move 174:00:52, 23 January 2006 (UTC) 66:17:18, 27 January 2007 (UTC) 3556:allows discussion to reach 3537:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 3520:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 3439:allows discussion to reach 3420:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 3403:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 3321:and submit your choices on 3097:reliable, secondary sources 2541:00:50, 30 August 2007 (UTC) 2522:18:23, 28 August 2007 (UTC) 2512:19:00, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 2490:19:14, 23 August 2007 (UTC) 2460:23:23, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 2447:21:18, 22 August 2007 (UTC) 2437:16:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC) 2418:18:05, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 2404:16:28, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 2386:17:54, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 2376:16:24, 15 August 2007 (UTC) 1684:Re:Compact Fluorescent Lamp 1624:Vince's Bridge - references 1036:the SuggestBot request page 3608: 3548:exist. In particular, the 3490:No indication this passes 3431:exist. In particular, the 3327:MediaWiki message delivery 3061:18:11, 15 March 2011 (UTC) 2849:tag. Here is the article: 2315:09:31, 7 August 2007 (UTC) 1716:23:55, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 1707:23:15, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 1697:20:29, 22 April 2007 (UTC) 1676:17:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC) 1659:17:21, 18 April 2007 (UTC) 1646:16:04, 18 April 2007 (UTC) 1609:00:33, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 1596:23:00, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1585:22:57, 12 April 2007 (UTC) 1564:23:04, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 1554:22:55, 19 March 2007 (UTC) 1534:17:21, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 1524:16:56, 14 March 2007 (UTC) 1380:SEA-ME-WE 4 (cable system) 1252:guidelines, I believe. -- 1031:, SuggestBot's caretaker. 813: 609:23:57, 4 August 2006 (UTC) 558:Lists of such definitions. 486:21:54, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 456:20:37, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 447:18:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 397:18:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 282:13:56, 21 April 2006 (UTC) 264:21:11, 20 April 2006 (UTC) 242:12:08, 12 April 2006 (UTC) 199:07:36, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 188:04:22, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 129:18:35, 1 August 2006 (UTC) 45:, if you haven't already. 3542:proposed deletion process 3425:proposed deletion process 3201:, but not as a source of 3181:A tag has been placed on 3095:. Please consider adding 2568:I think you'll find that 2529:Province of Bolzano-Bozen 2361:06:32, 20 July 2007 (UTC) 2321:List of device bandwidths 2305:23:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC) 2273:04:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC) 2251:20:14, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 2232:19:02, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 2218:15:20, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 2207:13:54, 21 June 2007 (UTC) 1639:Knowledge (XXG):Footnotes 1571:Sutherland Springs, Texas 1322:John Templeton Foundation 917: 379:22:50, 28 July 2006 (UTC) 298:What puzzled me is that 269:You Must Be Putting Me On 227:19:33, 1 April 2006 (UTC) 217:18:25, 1 April 2006 (UTC) 115:02:19, 13 Jan 2005 (UTC) 109:List of device bandwidths 83:17:35, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC) 49:17:35, 22 Nov 2004 (UTC) 3385:or by leaving a note at 3207:say it in your own words 3205:. This part is crucial: 3141:22:39, 24 May 2013 (UTC) 1731:page about worldwide DAB 1578:user:West London Dweller 1480:SEA-ME-WE 4 cable system 654:and the Great Panjandrum 357:13:55, 15 May 2006 (UTC) 342:12:06, 15 May 2006 (UTC) 324:11:35, 15 May 2006 (UTC) 91:08:24, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC) 3529:the article's talk page 3456:03:53, 5 May 2019 (UTC) 3412:the article's talk page 2582:I am not counting (per 2180:18:28, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 2151:16:59, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 2141:13:58, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 2118:13:39, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 2108:09:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 2098:09:10, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 2087:08:54, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 2072:09:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 2062:09:10, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 2044:08:43, 9 May 2007 (UTC) 2011:18:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 2001:18:01, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 1980:17:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 1970:16:48, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 1956:16:00, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 1918:18:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 1892:18:01, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 1871:17:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 1857:16:48, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 1819:18:20, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 1809:18:01, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 1787:17:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 1765:16:48, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 1742:14:02, 8 May 2007 (UTC) 1210:Miscellany for deletion 929:Astrology and astronomy 533:Dictionary definitions. 3508: 3475: 3391: 3373:and the more detailed 3354: 3244:contest the nomination 3178: 3160: 3037:a workaround available 2607:User talk:69.73.191.92 2570:User talk:69.73.191.92 2499:Raised Pavement Marker 2395: 1218: 1155:the other subpages at 1025:SuggestBot's talk page 952:Optical interferometry 832:Joint Astronomy Centre 781:Fountains of Bryn Mawr 577:slang and idiom guide. 96:British/American "bug" 33:since December 4, 2007 3554:articles for deletion 3488: 3484:proposed for deletion 3474: 3437:articles for deletion 3367: 3363:proposed for deletion 3353: 3299:Arbitration Committee 3159: 3081:notability guidelines 2478:The Original Barnstar 2394: 2371:good/currently bad)? 2293:. I'm trying to get 1737:ridiculously biased. 1206:Articles for deletion 1202: 707:-please note - it is 222:Thank-you very much! 3213:blocked from editing 3021:consensus discussion 2546:Three revert warning 1941:Reverend Ian Paisley 1482:be appropriate? -- 1436:format is the usual 970:Historical geography 934:Unemployment benefit 897:Paolo Lucio Anafesto 562:disambiguation pages 560:There are, however, 422:The other reference 335:cable landing points 257:Requested move redux 3303:arbitration process 2025:Normative reference 1669:Young Perry Alsbury 1641:. Hope that helps. 1545:this. Thank you. 1466:The argument about 1195:template, as here ( 827:Gregorian telescope 675:Try the following: 289:Cable landing point 3546:deletion processes 3476: 3429:deletion processes 3355: 3315:arbitration policy 3161: 2813:alerting you that 2773:Hello, as part of 2744:Franz Josef Strauß 2738:Franz Josef Strauß 2396: 2285:A long time ago... 2186:ANSI comments page 1476:naming conventions 71:Canonical articles 3504:WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES 3462:Proposed deletion 3387:User talk:Piotrus 3341:Proposed deletion 3278: 3248:visiting the page 2917: 2800:Unreferenced BLPs 2698:blatant vandalism 2552:WP:NOT#REPOSITORY 2496: 2495: 2413:non-restrictive. 1947:can cooperate in 1945:Martin McGuinness 1635:Template talk:Ref 1363: 1314:Talk:OpenDocument 1280:wikt:Talk:chuffed 1013: 1012: 965:Eltham ordinances 442:Hope that helps! 387:Flipping/Flopping 119:Flipping/Flopping 39: 38: 3599: 3569: 3539: 3538: 3522: 3521: 3473: 3452: 3422: 3421: 3405: 3404: 3352: 3276: 3270: 3268: 3261: 3158: 3135: 3074: 3073: 3030: 3026: 2971: 2970: 2916: 2915: 2901: 2857: 2848: 2842: 2831:reliable sources 2808: 2769:GA sweeps: Mummy 2716: 2704:Kind regards, — 2492: 2474: 2467: 2354:64B/66B encoding 1998:Digitalradiotech 1967:Digitalradiotech 1949:Northern Ireland 1889:Digitalradiotech 1854:Digitalradiotech 1806:Digitalradiotech 1773:; guidelines at 1762:Digitalradiotech 1739:Digitalradiotech 1552: 1357: 1230: 1224: 1194: 1188: 1168: 1162: 1136:I have opened a 1069:}}. Please see 1068: 907:Hippolyte Fizeau 842:Spectrum-X-Gamma 811: 496:Slang glossaries 376: 23: 16: 3607: 3606: 3602: 3601: 3600: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3577: 3576: 3571: 3567: 3550:speedy deletion 3536: 3535: 3519: 3518: 3471: 3469: 3454: 3450: 3433:speedy deletion 3419: 3418: 3402: 3401: 3350: 3348: 3323:the voting page 3289: 3272: 3264: 3257: 3179: 3156: 3154: 3147:Speedy deletion 3100: 3071: 3068: 3028: 3024: 3013: 2984:deletion policy 2976:Floating breech 2972: 2968: 2965: 2961:Floating breech 2938: 2858: 2846: 2844:unreferencedBLP 2840: 2802: 2771: 2740: 2722: 2708: 2677: 2651: 2548: 2533: 2501: 2481: 2479: 2430: 2368: 2366:Bad Telco Links 2323: 2289:...you started 2287: 2188: 2027: 1843:psychoacoustics 1726: 1688:Back to you at 1686: 1626: 1574: 1546: 1542: 1517: 1491:"should all of 1372: 1307: 1228: 1222: 1192: 1186: 1166: 1160: 1152: 1134: 1099: 1066: 1057:the bot edited 1052: 1027:. Thanks from 960:Callisto (moon) 912:Small telescope 837:Natural capital 803: 773: 656: 616: 523: 522: 512: 498: 428:as an example. 389: 372: 365: 333:and associated 317:Indicator Loops 292: 271: 235: 207: 181: 166: 164:Tagged articles 158: 136: 121: 98: 73: 55: 12: 11: 5: 3605: 3603: 3595: 3594: 3589: 3579: 3578: 3561: 3560:for deletion. 3540:will stop the 3468: 3459: 3444: 3443:for deletion. 3423:will stop the 3347: 3338: 3292: 3288: 3283: 3174:Article Wizard 3162: 3153: 3149:nomination of 3144: 3067: 3064: 3049:User:Jarry1250 3012: 3009: 2966: 2964: 2959:Nomination of 2957: 2937: 2934: 2919: 2918: 2801: 2798: 2787:GaryColemanFan 2770: 2767: 2739: 2736: 2721: 2718: 2702: 2701: 2689: 2685: 2676: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2650: 2647: 2646: 2645: 2644: 2643: 2642: 2641: 2640: 2639: 2638: 2637: 2547: 2544: 2532: 2526: 2525: 2524: 2500: 2497: 2494: 2493: 2485: 2483: 2480: 2477: 2475: 2465: 2464: 2463: 2462: 2450: 2449: 2429: 2424: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2407: 2406: 2389: 2388: 2367: 2364: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2322: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2286: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2279: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2275: 2258: 2257: 2256: 2255: 2254: 2253: 2238: 2237: 2236: 2235: 2221: 2220: 2187: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2173:in the article 2164: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2158: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2154: 2153: 2079: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2075: 2074: 2050: 2026: 2023: 2022: 2021: 2020: 2019: 2018: 2017: 2016: 2015: 2014: 2013: 1987: 1986: 1985: 1984: 1983: 1982: 1959: 1958: 1936: 1931: 1929: 1928: 1927: 1926: 1925: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1901: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1897: 1896: 1895: 1894: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1847: 1846: 1830: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1789: 1754: 1753: 1725: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1685: 1682: 1681: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1662: 1661: 1650: 1630:Vince's Bridge 1625: 1622: 1620: 1618: 1617: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1573: 1568: 1567: 1566: 1541: 1538: 1537: 1536: 1516: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1493:these articles 1472:these articles 1371: 1368: 1338:I went to the 1306: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1299: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1219: 1200: 1151: 1148: 1133: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1098: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1051: 1046: 1011: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1003: 998: 993: 990: 985: 980: 975: 972: 967: 962: 957: 954: 949: 944: 939: 936: 931: 926: 921: 916: 915: 914: 909: 904: 899: 894: 889: 884: 879: 874: 872:Ryle Telescope 869: 864: 859: 854: 849: 844: 839: 834: 829: 824: 819: 817: 802: 799: 798: 797: 772: 766: 765: 764: 763: 762: 719: 718: 705: 703: 702: 701: 696: 691: 686: 681: 655: 649: 648: 647: 637: 636: 615: 612: 598: 597: 596: 569: 566:glossary pages 555: 518: 517: 508: 507: 497: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 461: 460: 459: 458: 439: 438: 437: 436: 419: 418: 417: 416: 410: 409: 388: 385: 383: 368:Check this out 364: 361: 360: 359: 350: 345: 344: 310: 309: 306: 303: 291: 286: 270: 267: 234: 231: 230: 229: 206: 203: 202: 201: 180: 177: 165: 162: 157: 154: 152: 149:Thanks again! 135: 132: 120: 117: 105: 103: 97: 94: 93: 92: 72: 69: 54: 51: 37: 36: 24: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3604: 3593: 3590: 3588: 3585: 3584: 3582: 3575: 3574: 3570: 3564: 3559: 3555: 3551: 3547: 3543: 3532: 3530: 3526: 3515: 3513: 3507: 3505: 3501: 3497: 3493: 3487: 3485: 3481: 3467: 3463: 3460: 3458: 3457: 3453: 3447: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3430: 3426: 3415: 3413: 3409: 3398: 3396: 3390: 3388: 3384: 3380: 3376: 3372: 3366: 3364: 3360: 3346: 3342: 3339: 3337: 3336: 3332: 3328: 3324: 3320: 3316: 3312: 3308: 3304: 3300: 3296: 3287: 3284: 3282: 3281: 3277: 3275: 3269: 3267: 3262: 3260: 3254: 3249: 3245: 3240: 3238: 3234: 3230: 3226: 3222: 3217: 3215: 3214: 3208: 3204: 3200: 3196: 3192: 3188: 3184: 3177: 3175: 3170: 3168: 3152: 3148: 3145: 3143: 3142: 3139: 3134: 3131: 3128: 3125: 3122: 3119: 3116: 3113: 3110: 3106: 3103: 3102:Find sources: 3098: 3094: 3090: 3086: 3082: 3078: 3065: 3063: 3062: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3045: 3043: 3039: 3038: 3032: 3022: 3017: 3010: 3008: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2994: 2992: 2987: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2962: 2958: 2956: 2955: 2951: 2947: 2943: 2935: 2933: 2932: 2928: 2924: 2914: 2910: 2907: 2904: 2900: 2896: 2892: 2889: 2886: 2883: 2880: 2877: 2874: 2871: 2868: 2864: 2861: 2860:Find sources: 2855: 2852: 2851: 2850: 2845: 2838: 2837: 2832: 2828: 2827:verifiability 2824: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2807: 2799: 2797: 2796: 2792: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2768: 2766: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2749: 2745: 2737: 2735: 2734: 2731: 2727: 2719: 2717: 2714: 2711: 2707: 2699: 2695: 2690: 2686: 2682: 2681: 2680: 2674: 2670: 2667: 2663: 2662: 2661: 2660: 2657: 2648: 2636: 2633: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2620: 2619: 2616: 2612: 2611:greyproxy.com 2608: 2604: 2603: 2602: 2599: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2589: 2588:Dirk Beetstra 2585: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2576: 2571: 2567: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2561: 2560:Dirk Beetstra 2557: 2553: 2545: 2543: 2542: 2539: 2530: 2527: 2523: 2520: 2516: 2515: 2514: 2513: 2510: 2509:12.126.133.22 2505: 2498: 2491: 2488: 2476: 2473: 2469: 2468: 2461: 2458: 2454: 2453: 2452: 2451: 2448: 2445: 2441: 2440: 2439: 2438: 2435: 2428: 2425: 2419: 2416: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2408: 2405: 2402: 2398: 2397: 2393: 2387: 2384: 2380: 2379: 2378: 2377: 2374: 2365: 2363: 2362: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2347: 2342: 2338: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2320: 2316: 2313: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2306: 2303: 2301: 2296: 2292: 2284: 2274: 2271: 2266: 2265: 2264: 2263: 2262: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2252: 2249: 2244: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2239: 2233: 2230: 2225: 2224: 2223: 2222: 2219: 2216: 2211: 2210: 2209: 2208: 2205: 2200: 2197: 2196: 2191: 2185: 2181: 2178: 2174: 2169: 2168: 2167: 2152: 2149: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2139: 2135: 2131: 2126: 2121: 2120: 2119: 2116: 2111: 2110: 2109: 2106: 2101: 2100: 2099: 2096: 2091: 2090: 2088: 2085: 2081: 2080: 2073: 2070: 2065: 2064: 2063: 2060: 2055: 2054: 2051: 2048: 2047: 2046: 2045: 2042: 2037: 2034: 2030: 2024: 2012: 2009: 2004: 2003: 2002: 1999: 1995: 1994: 1993: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1989: 1988: 1981: 1978: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1968: 1963: 1962: 1961: 1960: 1957: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1937: 1934: 1933: 1932: 1919: 1916: 1911: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1907: 1906: 1905: 1904: 1903: 1902: 1893: 1890: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1872: 1869: 1865: 1860: 1859: 1858: 1855: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1848: 1844: 1840: 1836: 1832: 1831: 1820: 1817: 1812: 1811: 1810: 1807: 1802: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1798: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1788: 1785: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1769:Policy is at 1768: 1767: 1766: 1763: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1751: 1746: 1745: 1744: 1743: 1740: 1734: 1732: 1723: 1717: 1714: 1710: 1709: 1708: 1705: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1695: 1691: 1683: 1677: 1674: 1673:206.254.146.2 1670: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1660: 1657: 1656:206.254.146.2 1653: 1652: 1651: 1648: 1647: 1644: 1640: 1636: 1631: 1621: 1610: 1607: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1599: 1598: 1597: 1594: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1583: 1579: 1572: 1569: 1565: 1562: 1558: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1551: 1550: 1539: 1535: 1532: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1522: 1514: 1502: 1499: 1494: 1490: 1489: 1488: 1485: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1425: 1420: 1419: 1418: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1381: 1377: 1370:Cable systems 1369: 1367: 1366: 1361: 1356: 1351: 1349: 1344: 1341: 1336: 1333: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1315: 1310: 1304: 1294: 1291: 1290: 1286: 1281: 1276: 1275: 1274: 1271: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1261: 1260: 1256: 1251: 1247: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1238: 1234: 1227: 1220: 1217: 1215: 1211: 1207: 1201: 1198: 1191: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1178: 1177: 1173: 1165: 1158: 1149: 1147: 1146: 1143: 1139: 1132: 1128: 1124: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1107: 1102: 1097: 1094: 1090: 1087: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1076: 1072: 1064: 1060: 1055: 1050: 1047: 1045: 1044: 1041: 1037: 1032: 1030: 1026: 1022: 1017: 1007: 1004: 1002: 999: 997: 994: 991: 989: 986: 984: 981: 979: 976: 973: 971: 968: 966: 963: 961: 958: 955: 953: 950: 948: 945: 943: 942:Liquid mirror 940: 937: 935: 932: 930: 927: 925: 922: 919: 918: 913: 910: 908: 905: 903: 900: 898: 895: 893: 890: 888: 885: 883: 880: 878: 875: 873: 870: 868: 865: 863: 860: 858: 855: 853: 850: 848: 845: 843: 840: 838: 835: 833: 830: 828: 825: 823: 820: 818: 815: 814: 812: 809: 807: 800: 796: 793: 788: 787: 786: 785: 782: 778: 771: 767: 761: 758: 754: 752: 747: 746: 745: 742: 737: 736: 735: 734: 731: 727: 725: 717: 714: 710: 706: 704: 700: 697: 695: 692: 690: 687: 685: 682: 680: 677: 676: 674: 673: 672: 671: 668: 664: 662: 653: 650: 646: 643: 639: 638: 635: 632: 627: 626: 625: 624: 621: 613: 611: 610: 607: 603: 594: 590: 586: 582: 578: 574: 570: 567: 563: 559: 556: 553: 549: 546: 542: 538: 534: 531: 530: 529: 527: 521: 516: 513: 511: 505: 503: 495: 487: 484: 479: 475: 471: 467: 466: 465: 464: 463: 462: 457: 454: 450: 449: 448: 445: 441: 440: 434: 430: 429: 427: 424: 421: 420: 414: 413: 412: 411: 408: 405: 401: 400: 399: 398: 395: 386: 384: 381: 380: 377: 375: 369: 362: 358: 355: 351: 347: 346: 343: 340: 336: 332: 328: 327: 326: 325: 322: 318: 313: 307: 304: 301: 300: 299: 296: 290: 287: 285: 283: 280: 276: 268: 266: 265: 262: 258: 254: 250: 244: 243: 240: 232: 228: 225: 221: 220: 219: 218: 215: 212: 204: 200: 197: 192: 191: 190: 189: 186: 178: 176: 175: 172: 163: 161: 155: 153: 150: 147: 145: 141: 133: 131: 130: 127: 118: 116: 114: 110: 104: 101: 95: 90: 86: 85: 84: 82: 78: 70: 68: 67: 64: 59: 52: 50: 48: 44: 34: 30: 29: 25: 22: 18: 17: 3544:, but other 3533: 3525:edit summary 3516: 3509: 3489: 3478:The article 3477: 3427:, but other 3416: 3408:edit summary 3399: 3392: 3389:. Thank you. 3379:ping me back 3368: 3357:The article 3356: 3290: 3273: 3265: 3258: 3243: 3241: 3220: 3218: 3210: 3206: 3202: 3198: 3180: 3171: 3164: 3129: 3123: 3117: 3111: 3101: 3069: 3046: 3035: 3033: 3018: 3014: 2995: 2988: 2973: 2963:for deletion 2939: 2920: 2908: 2902: 2894: 2887: 2881: 2875: 2869: 2859: 2834: 2814: 2803: 2772: 2751: 2747: 2741: 2726:Anti-gravity 2723: 2720:Anti-gravity 2703: 2697: 2693: 2678: 2652: 2549: 2534: 2506: 2502: 2431: 2369: 2334: 2324: 2291:this article 2288: 2201: 2198: 2192: 2189: 2172: 2165: 2124: 2038: 2035: 2031: 2028: 1930: 1838: 1834: 1749: 1735: 1727: 1687: 1649: 1627: 1619: 1575: 1548: 1543: 1518: 1515:UK postcodes 1467: 1373: 1352: 1345: 1337: 1334: 1311: 1308: 1283: 1253: 1245: 1232: 1203: 1170: 1153: 1142:Gerry Ashton 1135: 1103: 1100: 1056: 1053: 1033: 1020: 1019:If you have 1018: 1014: 1006:Open economy 804: 774: 750: 723: 720: 708: 660: 657: 652:Samuel Foote 617: 599: 584: 576: 572: 557: 540: 532: 524: 519: 514: 509: 506: 499: 478:crop (image) 474:flop (image) 470:flip (image) 432: 390: 382: 373: 366: 314: 311: 297: 293: 272: 256: 252: 245: 236: 208: 182: 167: 159: 151: 148: 137: 122: 106: 102: 99: 74: 60: 56: 40: 32: 26: 3274:talk to me! 3199:information 3133:free images 2885:free images 2746:? Yes, it 2715:23:28 (UTC) 2300:Bencherlite 1839:differences 1388:SEA-ME-WE 4 1376:SEA-ME-WE 4 1199:), it says: 1067:⇌ 996:Congo River 988:Contra bass 956:Add Sources 902:First light 852:CHARA array 606:List Expert 573:usage guide 374:JackLumber. 63:Speculatrix 53:dishwashing 3581:Categories 3568:reply here 3451:reply here 3311:topic bans 3089:redirected 2946:Uzma Gamal 2785:. Thanks, 2675:Common Era 2556:WP:SOAPBOX 2538:Icsunonove 2484:Thank you! 1804:for this. 1667:Check out 1637:and here: 1521:Kbthompson 1438:convention 1138:discussion 1131:Common Era 1059:Hard Water 1049:Hard Water 1040:SuggestBot 882:Cygnus X-1 847:Box camera 806:SuggestBot 548:definition 541:begin with 537:dictionary 363:No comment 279:JackLumber 261:JackLumber 239:JackLumber 214:Vaoverland 205:Pocahontas 134:Thank you! 3558:consensus 3500:WP:BEFORE 3482:has been 3441:consensus 3361:has been 3359:Bell 212A 3345:Bell 212A 3307:site bans 3203:sentences 3191:copyright 3105:"RIOJA-2" 3053:LivingBot 2921:Thanks!-- 2706:SomeHuman 2694:vandalism 2666:Rarelibra 2656:Rarelibra 2649:Sub stuff 2605:The user 2487:Rarelibra 2457:Rarelibra 2444:Rarelibra 2434:Rarelibra 2415:Rarelibra 2401:Rarelibra 2383:Rarelibra 2373:Rarelibra 1845:may help. 1724:DAB Intro 1711:Again. - 1702:Again. - 1434:canonical 1432:standard 1402:Tangerine 1250:transwiki 1246:temporary 1106:Arriva436 1029:ForteTuba 757:Dialogue? 730:Dialogue? 667:Dialogue? 642:Rarelibra 631:Rarelibra 620:Rarelibra 185:Rarelibra 113:DavidCary 3492:WP:NCORP 3381:through 3211:will be 3138:VoxelBot 3042:WP:MINOR 2756:Unschool 2352:or even 2339:and the 2337:bit rate 2268:issues. 1606:Shoessss 1582:Shoessss 1549:Reywas92 1226:db-owner 1190:db-owner 1164:db-owner 1116:Disaster 1086:CmdrObot 1021:feedback 753:Ganymead 751:*Exeunt* 726:Ganymead 724:*Exeunt* 663:Ganymead 661:*Exeunt* 89:Maurreen 81:Maurreen 47:Maurreen 3480:FARLAND 3466:FARLAND 3383:WP:ECHO 3121:scholar 3093:deleted 3077:RIOJA-2 2980:deleted 2923:DASHBot 2891:WP refs 2879:scholar 2130:Webmink 1713:MSTCrow 1704:MSTCrow 1694:MSTCrow 1353:Yours, 1330:WP:CITE 1326:WP:NPOV 1063:unicode 947:Geodesy 924:Hardpan 920:Cleanup 593:freedom 581:Cockney 552:numbers 171:Tsavage 3527:or on 3496:WP:GNG 3410:or on 3297:. The 3255:. -- 3085:merged 2998:Sadads 2863:Google 2821:. The 2730:Tcisco 2710:13 Sep 2615:Simosx 2584:WP:3RR 1576:Hello, 1410:Pangea 1408:, and 1406:Apollo 1355:Sdedeo 1348:WP:COI 1340:WP:COI 992:Expand 974:Wikify 589:nation 476:, and 3259:Mdann 3183:Vanco 3151:Vanco 3127:JSTOR 3115:books 3091:, or 3029:false 2944:" -- 2906:JSTOR 2867:books 2779:Mummy 2350:8B10B 1442:IUPAC 1282:. -- 1233:quite 983:Bokeh 938:Merge 816:Stubs 709:Grand 614:Vanco 453:Stev0 394:Stev0 370:. 179:Vanco 126:Stev0 3331:talk 3237:here 3221:must 3109:news 3057:talk 3025:true 3002:talk 2950:talk 2936:Move 2927:talk 2899:FENS 2873:news 2791:talk 2783:here 2760:talk 2713:2007 2554:ánd 2531:(BZ) 2346:4B5B 2341:baud 1943:and 1692:. - 1484:Chuq 1449:and 1424:Chuq 1392:Chuq 1360:tips 1328:and 1320:and 1318:FIRE 1289:blis 1259:blis 1176:blis 1054:Hi, 862:MOXE 857:Pork 545:good 433:Flop 277:. -- 255:and 144:AAL5 142:." 140:AAL5 43:this 3464:of 3343:of 3291:Hi, 3246:by 3239:. 2913:TWL 2836:701 2811:bot 2632:WLD 2628:TOR 2598:WLD 2575:WLD 2519:WLD 2358:WLD 2348:or 2312:WLD 2270:hAl 2248:WLD 2229:hAl 2215:WLD 2204:hAl 2177:WLD 2148:hAl 2138:WLD 2125:you 2115:hAl 2105:WLD 2095:hAl 2084:WLD 2069:WLD 2059:hAl 2041:hAl 2008:WLD 1977:WLD 1953:WLD 1915:WLD 1868:WLD 1816:WLD 1784:WLD 1643:WLD 1593:WLD 1561:WLD 1531:WLD 1498:WLD 1459:WLD 1414:WLD 1378:to 1285:nae 1270:WLD 1255:nae 1237:WLD 1172:nae 1120:WLD 1075:WLD 792:WLD 768:RE: 741:WLD 713:WLD 591:or 575:or 483:WLD 444:WLD 354:jmb 339:WLD 321:jmb 224:WLD 196:WLD 3583:: 3531:. 3514:. 3498:. 3414:. 3397:. 3333:) 3309:, 3266:52 3216:. 3107:– 3087:, 3059:) 3051:, 3004:) 2986:. 2952:) 2929:) 2893:) 2856:- 2847:}} 2841:{{ 2793:) 2762:) 2748:is 2089:\ 1835:is 1404:, 1229:}} 1223:{{ 1193:}} 1187:{{ 1167:}} 1161:{{ 755:| 728:| 665:| 571:A 543:a 472:, 251:, 79:. 3565:| 3506:. 3494:/ 3448:| 3329:( 3169:. 3130:· 3124:· 3118:· 3112:· 3055:( 3000:( 2948:( 2925:( 2909:· 2903:· 2895:· 2888:· 2882:· 2876:· 2870:· 2865:( 2815:1 2789:( 2758:( 2752:ß 2234:. 1362:) 1358:( 1287:' 1257:' 1216:. 1174:' 1065:| 554:. 431:"

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index