Knowledge

User talk:Win777

Source 📝

1131:: "Verifiable" in this context means that any reader must be able to check that material added to Knowledge has already been published by a reliable source, because Knowledge does not publish original thought or original research." Other people can verify the Yankees' uniform by looking at it, but they cannot verify these people as fans because you have not provided a source. Seeing if certain people are fans is not "common sense" like looking at a uniform. Who knows? Maybe someone was wearing a Yankee cap because s/he lost a bet, but the person is actually a Red Sox fan. "The threshold for inclusion in Knowledge is 694:. This link in particular will take you to the baseball Wikicity. As you'll see it's similar to Knowledge, but my hope is this will allow baseball fans to do more and different things, like reporting on games, in depth statistics, create mulitple pages for pictures, and whatever else baseball fans care to create. You've done such great work on Knowledge I was hoping you could help me get this baseball Wikicity off the ground. Please tet me know what you think either at my talk page, or you can email me at terry@wikia.com. Thanks! 759:'s talk page last month: Are the categories for members of World Series champions really necessary? I can't help thinking it would be more economical to simply include the roster of the champion team in the article for that year's World Series (most of the WS articles could use some serious expansion). There's already something of a glut of categories on some articles, including those for baseball players with numerous All-Star appearances. (Between All-Star games and WS champions alone, 477:"Titles" is a good idea, I will change that. I see someone added "Playoff apearances" to the pages this morning, I do not have a problem with those, it is just a matter of when is too much too much? Truthfully, though, if you ask me, all you have to do is add up the championships and you can derive the # of playoff appearances that way - it is not like the NFL or NBA or NHL where you kind of lose track (just my opinion, not really rejecting it, just skeptical). 1117:
the team's high-profile supporters. Third, it's not "original research." It's common sense. Just as the section on the design of the Yankee uniform doesn't contain any references (why should there be when it's patently visible), no references are needed to document a matter of common and/or visible knowledge such as whether Person A is a fan of the Yankees. A cite is not required of every single sentence uttered on Knowledge.-
1635: 1354: 228:
with Geographic and Divisional rivalries was both NPOV and inspired. Divisional rivalries do exist. Good examples would be Anaheim and Oakland right now. And the rest of the divisional teams invariably come into contention vs each other when they are in competition for 1st. Geographic rivalries for instance SF and Oakland also exist as both team compete on field for bragging rights and off field for revenue, fans, etc...
1904: 289:
fans, prior to games. And many of them such as the A's and Giants have been spatting over more then just on field performance, but revenue, territorial rights etc... for year. Any rivalries listed beyond that are fancruft of the worst degree. No major competitive (either on or off field) matchups exist outside of geography or division in MLB (and indeed any other sport save USC-Notre Dame in NCAAF).
504:
place if we have a picture of the logo? That has always bothered me a little, I think it may have been added right when the pages were created in 2002 just to put some meat on the page; I usually do not see a description of the logo when there is a picture, but this is just me thinking out loud, maybe it is usually descibed and I just never really noticed. What do you think?
1996: 482:
I am kind of thinking now that maybe anything that I left off of the infobox (team colors, team mascot, playoff appearance, etc.) we could stick at the botom of the page under the potpourri heading "Quick facts"; that might keep people from cluttering up the infobox and also encourage them to add all
1116:
Actually, wrong on both counts. It's and unwanted section by YOU and one other person. Myself, plus two others on prior occassions, have included it. So you're actually in the minority. Second, try taking a look at the articles on any of EPL teams--just about all of them have a section detailing
932:
significant until they are finalized (such as at the end of a season). Milestones, such as a pitcher's 300th win, can be put on articles because those achievements are final and significant; the date of the accomplishment will not change and neither will the fact that the accomplishment was reached.
885:
My suggestion is to revert it and to leave a message on the Aeros' or the user's talk page that shows the consensus against having current records and stats. Minor league rosters would fall under "current" as they change so frequently and would become outdated quickly should the fan stop editing the
859:
Not sure what to do about this, but our diehard resident Akron fan just put the hard-coded roster back on this page and removed the links to the team site. He left the rest of my expansions, but still. The idea was to eliminate the need to update the page every two days. Maybe he gets his jollies
227:
Lets use yours since the discussion has already begun here. I've read those links, but most of them refer to the "rivalries" created by that shadowman a while back. Those were definitely POV and by and large made up (Citrus Derby anyone?). However I believe the way many of the articles were reworked
170:
Good luck. That anonymous character that posted them might come back. As an alternative, for teams that I know something about (i.e Chicago and Minnesota), I have substituted "Traditional Rivals" and "Divisional Rivals", both of which are, respectively, verifiable and obvious. A lot of that "main
509:
Regarding the team colors, and using Oakland as an extreme, since the infobox lists the history of the information, I am afraid the infobox could become rather lengthy since Oakland has a rather "colorful" history; I was thinking that that might actually warrant a paragraph or two for each team in
503:
If we stick those in the infobox, do you have an idea how they should be fit? My logic is we have to draw the line some where to keep it from being too long. Logo designs would not be too hard to fit in there right under the logo maybe(?), but if you think about it, it is really needed in the first
317:
Yeah I saw that. I'll refrain from readding them to any other articles for the time being, at least under rivalries. I might put "Divisional Competition" and "Geographic Competition" as you suggest on any further articles until the debate comes to some resolution. I don't think it had nearly enough
288:
Also I realize there has been some difficulty in determining what constitutes a rivalry. Divisional rivalries exist, you obviously think so per your wish to rename the term but keep the info above. Geographic rivalries are a certainty. Many of them have names, are advertised by the press, teams and
276:
I believe that stem from the misuse by that phantom rival man earlier this summer. He created so many "rivalries" that he's tainted the word here. It's not a POV word in general. All great "competitions" that exist without any question or debate such as Sanford-Cal, NYY-Boston, Ohio St-Michagan are
510:
the body of the article. If we start listing "current" items, I am afraid people will start listing current TV stations, current owner, current payroll (just look at the mess on the BoSox page); that is why I was proposing to quietly shove all of that to the bottom of the page. What do you think?--
298:
If you want to keep using "Divisional Rivals" and "Geographic Rivals", I say, (under protest - it's not something I'll like) go ahead. It's better than "Main Rivals" and is something that should be handled with extreme care, though. There some famous rivalries, like Yankees-Red Sox, but others are
257:
The only problem I would have with "Teams in the same division" is that it takes away from the fact that they are rivals who are competing for a common prize. The word rival is not a POV term unless it's being misused by creating rivalries that don't exist. For instance on the Red Sox page someone
914:
I don't like having "current" records and stats on Knowledge. They become outdated too quickly. Knowledge should not have to rely on a few people to keep this type of information accurate. Records and stats up to last season should be as recent as they come because these types of information for
825:
page this morning, so I went ahead and did it. I've been using this same "outline" for other teams in the Eastern League (I'm about halfway through). Feel free to take a look. I need to expound on their stadium a little (I've been describing the actual design and "neat features" on the other
962:
Hello. This is really straightforward stuff that I shouldn't have to come to your talk page to remind you of: Don't delete other people's talk page comments. While it is, of course, acceptable to move discussions to archive pages when the page grows large, but it's certainly not needed on
493:"Playoff appearances" isn't necessary, but not everyone will know how to derive that information from Wild Card and Division titles. Team uniform designs, logo designs, and the like should be in the infobox. Mascot info should be in a type of "Fun facts" or "Quick facts" box. -- 344:
Hi, saw you took the BP link out because it required registration. Is that a WP guideline for links, because, if so, I'm unfamiliar with it. At a minimum, we should incorporate some the facts in that very good BP article into the Y-RS rivalry wikiarticle. Thoughts?
763:
would end up with 25 categories, in addition to another 15 already on his page.) I don't think it's advantageous to have that many categories on an article; at some point, it gets difficult to wade through them, and individual categories become easy to miss.
354:
I don't think it would be very helpful to a normal person to register just to see one page, especially if a user is not looking for much or not thinking of using the site long term. It's inconvenient, and too many sites require registration today.
718:. If you have the time, I'd appreciated it if you'd compare the articles and leave any feedback you might have on the rewrite discussion page. I'd like to reach a consensus before makeing major changes to the main article. Thanks for your help. -- 1527:
has a history unlike any other sport. It has been played in countless countries throughout the decades, and it will undoubtedly continue play for many more. On this eve, some the finest players the sport has to offer will take the field at the
157:
Hi, sources for the Mercora entry can be found in two locations: a) the Mercora corporate website listed in External links, and b) the ABC News and PC Magazine articles listed in Press. Please let me know if you require more details.
1039:
I removed {{Baseball-WikiProject|class=B|importance=Top}} and replaced it with {{Baseball-WikiProject|class=NA}} inasmuch as portal space ≠ mainspace and in view of the necessary unprintworthiness of portal space (consistent with
837:
it exist?) for all the minor league teams? As much as guys move around, do they need to belong in a "category" of every minor-league team they ever played for? Just curious. Maybe another discussion topic for the project page.
1568:
we've gathered at for future generations to read about, to learn about, to dream about; but more importantly we can watch tonight and we can remember how baseball is unlike anything else that we will encounter in our lives. —
171:
rivals" junk, as well as pointing to non-existent articles, was somebody's invention. Where articles exist, such as Yankees-Red Sox, Dodgers-Giants, Cubs-Cardinals, Cubs-White Sox, etc., the rivalry stuff actually has merit.
806:
You reverted that a-none's running commentary on the 2006 season (which I might agree is a bit excessive) by pointing to the "What Knowledge Is Not" page, but did not point to the specific rule that is being violated.
216:
I've reverted your edit removing the rivalries. As it was worded prior to the delete it was not POV. Divisional rivalries are a certainty in all sports. And the Giants are a geographic/local rival both off and on the
1073:. Also refrain from rephrasing the sentence on road attendance--the phrase "the country" is used numerous times throughout the article and is self-explanatory, as the subject of the article is the NEW YORK Yankees.- 923:
on topics of historical significance that are currently in the news, and can be significantly more up-to-date than most reference sources since we can incorporate new developments and facts as they are made known."
2147: 872:
I am far(!) from your "diehard resident Akron fan" but I understand a little of what you are saying. Agreed, the red linked names on the current roster look tacky and should go. The roster however should stay.
2213:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2080: 1559:
decided to build a new house, and over the years, that house was a home to some of the greatest baseball ever played. If I were to list out all of these great moments, it would be longer than the bill for the
123: 267:
How about "Divisional Competition" and/or "Regional Competition"? There's something about the word "rival/s" that irks me when it's used in something that is supposed to be NPOV such as Knowledge. --
1738: 472:
eventually, but I do not know how far along that is. I was just sticking those at the bottom of the page as a stopgap for the time being. Maybe you could see if he wants some help.....
362:: "That is, try to avoid sites requiring payment, registration, or extra applications (Flash, Java, etc.) to see the relevant content, at least if there is a simpler site available." -- 1395: 1730: 1714: 1438: 378:
I am nearing completion of the infoboxes for each MLB team and I wanted to run it by a few individuals before I ran it by the project and published them. Check out a finished one
1718: 1734: 1726: 915:
last season are too subject to change, which I can't say for stats and records "as of Month, Day, 2006." Knowledge is not here to offer news reports; that's for Wikinews. From
277:
called rivalries. I think we've just been turned off to the word by its earlier misuse here. However that doesn't have to make it a bad word to use in an encyclopedic context.
1710: 1249:
process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "
2141: 886:
roster. If a user has to update an article daily because the article keeps becoming outdated, there's a problem. Knowledge is not a news source/service or a directory (
652: 2074: 1173:. Please take a look and vote on an article or add one of your own. Once an article has been agreed upon, feel free to stop by and lend a hand in getting it to 113:
You can sign your name using three tildes, like this: ~~~. If you use four, you can add a datestamp too. Always sign comments on Talk pages, never sign Articles.
980:: "Talk pages are not for general chatter; please keep discussions on talk pages on the topic of how to improve the associated article." The discussions on 1257:). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at 247:. Apparently, other editors feel that it is something that should not be included. I myself would feel more comfortable with "Teams in same division." -- 97: 198:
You went into lengthy detail about the design of the Yankees' top hat logo. I didn't remove that (I'll leave that up to you) but I added that it's an "
1959:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
1504: 1497: 608: 579: 520:
Basic stuff, like titles and retired numbers, to the infobox. Current/fun facts to a box at the bottom or as a paragraph in the actual article. --
2008: 1839: 1552:
worked there; but what do all these events have in common? They fail to reach the level of greatness that the baseball that was played there did.
1481: 1964: 1891:. Both series in the American League have yet to be finished. Show your support for your favorite teams by keeping up with their season pages! 1266: 2238: 180:
Actually, I had not got around to doing anything with the Twins. In fact, the only obvious rivals currently, besides the Yankees (who are
1402: 1312: 405:
Looks good. Maybe replace "champs" with "titles" and add "Playoff appearances"? I'd still like to see the minor league teams, though.
933:
Current records and current stats in baseball become outdated almost concurrently. See other people's thoughts on current records:
542:, and often times complements studying the diff. Think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. I hope you don't mind. :) Cheers, 1929: 1316: 1261:. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to 1098:, which are policy." So, please provide a published source that verifies these people as fans. If you cannot, then it's against 2234: 1968: 1933: 1754: 1320: 1262: 1250: 258:
had put the Braves as an Interleague rival. They are no more rivals then the Chicago Bears and the Philadelphia Phillies are.
2162: 2025: 1294:. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are delisted. The instructions for the review process are 1091: 1082:
It's also common to have none or few citations, but that's a problem on Knowledge (To see how much of a problem this is, see
977: 786: 79: 714:, or because you've edited other baseball or sports related articles. I've recently completed a revision of this article at 538:
more often when you contribute. An edit summary helps others understand what you changed when checking the watchlist or the
2129: 2095: 1433: 1299: 469: 2062: 1884:
We apologize for not sending out our August newsletter, we have tried to cover some events of the month in this issue.
894:). The fan's edits leave too many redlinks (the players are not that notable yet), and the article is too cluttered. -- 43: 25: 2225:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1887:
The playoffs have started! The Dodgers and Phillies have won their respective Division Series and will face off in the
1083: 2230: 1911: 1664: 1541: 1428: 1246: 1069:
Quit reverting the section on famous fans. This is a very common section for articles dealing with sports teams (see
850:
Good work on the Aeros page. For the minor league team categories, I'd leave the discussion for the project page. --
386:
was not sure about how to handle "notes" about championships and retired numbers so I stuck the notes on the template
202:" style, which I think is self-explanatory, and the link to Uncle Sam should cover it, just in case it isn't. =|:)# 1221:? I'd be most interested in additional opinions in the dispute between me and Tecmobowl as to the article content. 75: 1923:
Notability of the "Battle of Ohio" or the series unexplained, could simply be merged into team or season articles.
1953: 1937: 1258: 1254: 682:
here - I'm a fellow Wikipeidan and baseball fan, and noticed you've done some good work on the New York Yankees.
547: 318:
time to be fleshed out before however. I'm standing by the A's and Giants articles as they've been reverted also.
47: 2123: 1515:
in the final round, 5 home runs to 3, although Hamilton broke a record with 28 home runs hit in the first round.
2033: 1872: 1742: 1722: 890:). Knowledge is not a fan site either. The article as it is right now is too local and leaning toward vanity ( 625: 566: 382:. Please focus on the info box and not the rest of the page. Here are some points I wanted some feedback on: 359: 71: 63: 2015:
policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure
1918:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern: 2056: 860:
by doing it and I should just let him be. Thoughts? I'm not an admin, so not quite sure how to handle it.
1415:
In the past month, WikiProject Baseball has had the following articles promoted to Featured Article status:
1167:
member! Just a quick note: there is now an article improvement drive just for baseball-related articles at
1095: 756: 379: 2119: 1831: 1577: 1473: 1308: 981: 964: 755:
I noticed you've been adding the cats in some of these cases, so I thought I'd ask a question I posted to
117: 59: 1677:
The Baseball Project promoted 13 lists to Featured status in August and 8 more in September. Amazing job!
1153: 1118: 1074: 790: 2052: 1103: 742: 443: 39: 715: 2169: 1915: 1782: 1242: 1231: 1033: 696: 679: 656: 651:. Excess wikilinks and piping don't go on disambiguation pages. One wikilink per line is reasonable. 543: 435: 143: 1203:
I removed the unreferenced tag because all of the info I posted is from the manga and anime series.
874: 407:
Perhaps adding them this way: for example, with its own section in the box, the Yankees would have:
2226: 2155: 2102: 2088: 1972: 1945: 1184: 687: 1952:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
2023:. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2020: 1625: 1561: 1344: 605: 576: 451: 389:
I limited the infobox to MAJOR LEAGUE info only, no Western League and no other minor league info
159: 67: 1044:); if you think me to have been wrong, please revert me or leave a note at the portal talk.  :) 1135:." Verifiability, NOT TRUTH. Looking at a uniform is verifiable because it's clearly there. -- 988: 971: 2202: 2193: 2183: 2016: 1826: 1572: 1545: 1468: 1423: 1303: 1218: 1217:
I'd prefer not to drag other people into this, but could you have a look at the discussion at
782: 419: 104: 984:
were chatter about Windows Live Mail. They were not discussions on improving the article. --
2222: 2206: 2135: 1980: 1798: 1770: 1766: 1698: 1283: 1204: 1023: 934: 891: 830: 739: 728: 719: 328: 319: 290: 278: 259: 229: 218: 2221:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 710:
I'm posting this message on you Talk Page either because you've contributed to the article
1790: 1778: 1597: 1549: 1291: 1222: 1169: 1015: 765: 427: 139: 2068: 1564:. So I'll sum it up by saying that we can remember these great moments by adding them to 1265:, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the 833:), they've got a category called Akron Aeros Players. Is that something that exists (or 1680:
A combined eleven articles were promoted to Good Article status in August and September.
2218: 2210: 2110: 1960: 1806: 1634: 1529: 1508: 1448: 1353: 1295: 1287: 1180: 1163: 1087: 1070: 949: 906: 808: 800: 539: 535: 534:
Thank you for your contributions. And I have a request. I would like to ask you to use
511: 484: 397: 203: 185: 172: 51: 1014:
Suggestion: Don't post it to users more than once. See where this becomes a problem
905:
I'm keeping the articles up to date, rather than having them for the previous season.
2214: 2012: 2000: 1762: 1512: 1418: 1331: 1238: 1099: 1045: 1041: 1001: 916: 887: 861: 842: 735: 602: 573: 439: 346: 55: 1903: 110:
Click on the Edit button on a page, and look at how other editors did what they did.
2179: 1774: 1660: 1391:
Welcome to the first Baseball WikiProject Newsletter, dated Tuesday, July 15, 2008.
1175: 994: 968: 775: 734:
If you want to argue with him, please don't do it on my talk page. And, it's worth
184:
rival), are teams in their division. So it's pretty much bogus. Good riddance.
1650:"If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving a baby's life... 2043: 2029:
article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the
1976: 1928:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's
1270: 1197: 1136: 1128: 1107: 1054: 1019: 985: 940: 895: 851: 822: 665: 629: 589: 557: 521: 494: 459: 363: 309: 300: 268: 248: 1817: 1794: 1786: 1690:
In September, WikiProject Baseball has had the following articles promoted to:
1592: 1459: 1379: 760: 683: 396:
Any feedback, especially constructive, is much appreciated, have a good one!--
1888: 1838:. If you would like to contribute to future newsletters, please contact the 1565: 1556: 1480:. If you would like to contribute to future newsletters, please contact the 711: 199: 96:
If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in
691: 78:— and if you have any more questions after that, feel free to post them on 937: 1758: 1524: 1053:
It's fine. I was going to correct myself, but you got there first. :) --
1995: 1655:
she'll save the baby without even considering how many men are on base!"
1537: 1063: 967:, which you deleted in its entirety for no easily discernable reason. 572:
Actually, I was creating that category, which is why it was redlinked.
1000:
I removed CSD as it provides a basic definition capable of expansion.
655:
has more information and I'm always happy to discuss disambiguation.--
251: 221: 1086:). Just because something is commonplace doesn't make it right. See 829:
I noticed on some of the "alumni", when you link to their bio page (
2242: 2187: 1984: 1609: 1325: 1273: 1225: 1207: 1188: 1139: 1121: 1110: 1077: 1057: 1048: 1027: 1004: 952: 943: 909: 877: 864: 854: 845: 811: 793: 768: 745: 722: 668: 659: 632: 611: 592: 582: 560: 551: 524: 514: 497: 487: 462: 400: 366: 349: 331: 322: 312: 303: 293: 281: 271: 262: 232: 206: 188: 175: 1290:. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to 2209:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
1533: 124:
Knowledge:Contributing to articles outside your native language
1104:
Talk:New_York_Yankees#Unwarranted_Sections_and_Missing_History
624:
Just like I did. Assign it a parent category and description.
103:
If you want to play around with your new Wiki skills, try the
1963:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the 1902: 1633: 1352: 1090:, which states: "Providing sources for edits is mandated by 392:
stuck Jackie Robinson onto template rather than on each team
93:
Here are some extra tips to help you get around Knowledge:
1940:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the 1739:
List of Arizona Diamondbacks Opening Day starting pitchers
66:(for general questions). There's still more help at the 1932:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " 308:
CrazyTalk has also left a message on your talk page. --
42:. If you need help on how to name new articles, look at 1999:
Hello Win777! Thank you for your contributions. I am a
1010:"Please give uploaded images meaningful names." message 648: 245: 242: 239: 2154: 2087: 1731:
List of Seattle Mariners Opening Day starting pitchers
1715:
List of Colorado Rockies Opening Day starting pitchers
1439:
List of Major League Baseball players from Puerto Rico
483:
sorts of interesting/weird stuff. What do you think?--
1719:
List of Florida Marlins Opening Day starting pitchers
601:
How would I have made it bluelinked, adding content?
58:, and if you can't find your answer there, check the 1805:
This month's newsletter was designed and written by
1735:
List of Boston Red Sox Opening Day starting pitchers
1727:
List of Tampa Bay Rays Opening Day starting pitchers
1447:
This month's newsletter was designed and written by
588:
Making it blue linked would have helped... Done. --
1711:
List of New York Mets Opening Day starting pitchers
2201:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 1854:The 2008 opening round playoff matchups with be: 1245:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the 327:Damn Sox. Their only saving grace is Fenway Park. 46:, and for help on formatting the pages visit the 2007:of the articles that you created are tagged as 1401:The Outreach department is in the works, please 789:your opinion is particularly valued. Thanks. 653:Knowledge:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages) 2168: 2101: 8: 1860:Milwaukee Brewers vs. Philadelphia Phillies 2009:Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons 1618: 1337: 1148: 238:My examples were recent. Here are 3 more: 122:If your first language isn't English, try 1899:Proposed deletion of Battle of Ohio (MLB) 1152: 957: 62:(for Knowledge related questions) or the 38:I hope you like working here and want to 1102:. It's not a wanted section anyway. See 22: 1914:template has been added to the article 1374:no matter if it's home or on the road." 1749:Good Articles of August and September: 1145:New baseball article improvement drive 781:please join the current discussion at 116:You might want to add yourself to the 2019:, all biographies should be based on 1857:Boston Red Sox vs. Los Angeles Angels 1321:tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM 948:Decent enough thought - Good work :) 821:I saw you added a cleanup tag to the 458:or some sort of slight variation. -- 7: 1866:Chicago White Sox vs. Tampa Bay Rays 1863:Los Angeles Dodgers vs. Chicago Cubs 1179:status. Hope you can participate! — 826:parks), but that's for another day. 50:. If you need general help, look at 74:. Also, don't forget to visit the 1369:"A home opener is always exciting, 647:About your edit to Texas Rangers: 14: 2227:review the candidates' statements 1084:Category:Articles needing sources 690:have made a new webstie called 26: 1994: 98:assigning those to your username 1755:All the Way (Eddie Vedder song) 1604: 1598: 1593: 1398:has been revived. Check it out! 958:Don't delete talk page comments 2233:. For the Election committee, 2203:Arbitration Committee election 2194:ArbCom elections are now open! 1615:October Baseball WP Newsletter 1542:The Greatest Game Ever Played 1500:is scheduled for this evening. 1208:18:38, 23 September 2006 (UTC) 1092:Knowledge:No original research 978:Knowledge:Talk page guidelines 787:Knowledge:WikiProject Baseball 1: 2243:13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 2013:biographies of living persons 1971:, where it may be deleted if 1601: 1434:Philadelphia Phillies seasons 1189:00:03, 8 September 2006 (UTC) 928:stats and records aren't too 669:00:34, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 660:00:30, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 633:00:28, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 612:00:22, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 593:23:55, 19 December 2005 (UTC) 583:22:24, 19 December 2005 (UTC) 561:01:28, 20 December 2005 (UTC) 552:00:28, 19 December 2005 (UTC) 2188:01:14, 16 January 2010 (UTC) 1274:07:16, 11 January 2007 (UTC) 1241:}}" template to the article 1226:21:02, 9 November 2006 (UTC) 919:: "Knowledge does have many 774:If you have any interest in 723:20:36, 4 February 2006 (UTC) 340:Yankees-Red Sox rivalry page 2229:and submit your choices on 1938:Knowledge's deletion policy 1429:St. Louis Cardinals seasons 1255:Knowledge's deletion policy 1140:03:17, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 1122:03:12, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 1111:03:10, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 1100:Primary (original) research 1078:02:58, 19 August 2006 (UTC) 1058:12:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 1049:06:15, 16 August 2006 (UTC) 525:22:11, 6 October 2005 (UTC) 515:05:56, 6 October 2005 (UTC) 498:01:18, 5 October 2005 (UTC) 488:23:33, 4 October 2005 (UTC) 463:22:55, 4 October 2005 (UTC) 401:22:27, 4 October 2005 (UTC) 367:20:19, 30 August 2005 (UTC) 350:20:08, 30 August 2005 (UTC) 332:20:47, 23 August 2005 (UTC) 323:18:25, 23 August 2005 (UTC) 313:18:18, 23 August 2005 (UTC) 304:18:13, 23 August 2005 (UTC) 294:18:06, 23 August 2005 (UTC) 282:18:04, 23 August 2005 (UTC) 272:17:58, 23 August 2005 (UTC) 263:17:52, 23 August 2005 (UTC) 252:17:48, 23 August 2005 (UTC) 233:17:38, 23 August 2005 (UTC) 222:17:21, 23 August 2005 (UTC) 2258: 2235:MediaWiki message delivery 1873:articles of the postseason 1640:Issue III – October 2008 1298:. Reviewers' concerns are 1028:02:44, 7 August 2006 (UTC) 769:21:55, 27 April 2006 (UTC) 746:23:47, 29 March 2006 (UTC) 207:02:55, 1 August 2005 (UTC) 162:19:12, 30 June 2006 (PDT) 1985:05:55, 6 March 2009 (UTC) 1961:proposed deletion process 1846: 1840:Baseball WP outreach dept 1621: 1610:03:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC) 1544:" was battled out there, 1488: 1482:Baseball WP outreach dept 1396:Article Improvement Drive 1340: 1326:21:43, 12 July 2007 (UTC) 1286:has been nominated for a 1005:19:24, 22 July 2006 (UTC) 702:, 15:23, 4 January 2006. 567:Category:MLB team rosters 189:17:32, 31 July 2005 (UTC) 176:17:27, 31 July 2005 (UTC) 131: 85: 1965:speedy deletion criteria 1743:New York Yankees seasons 1723:Nashville Sounds seasons 1693:Featured Article status: 1267:speedy deletion criteria 1133:verifiability, not truth 989:20:04, 6 July 2006 (UTC) 972:19:03, 6 July 2006 (UTC) 953:19:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC) 944:16:59, 6 July 2006 (UTC) 910:06:51, 6 July 2006 (UTC) 878:20:28, 5 July 2006 (UTC) 865:17:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC) 855:19:46, 4 July 2006 (UTC) 846:18:37, 4 July 2006 (UTC) 812:13:23, 26 May 2006 (UTC) 626:Knowledge:Categorization 530:Request for edit summary 468:Gateman1997 was doing a 360:Knowledge:External links 149:21:13, 2 Apr 2005 (UTC) 2039:tag. Here is the list: 1096:Knowledge:Verifiability 794:08:31, 4 May 2006 (UTC) 80:my New-Users' Talk Page 1975:to delete is reached. 1930:criteria for inclusion 1907: 1889:NL Championship Series 1672:News and announcements 1638: 1507:took place yesterday. 1386:News and announcements 1357: 982:Talk:Windows Live Mail 965:Talk:Windows Live Mail 674:Baseball on Wikicities 299:not as well-known. -- 2207:Arbitration Committee 1969:Articles for Deletion 1967:or it can be sent to 1934:What Knowledge is not 1906: 1849:News from the diamond 1705:Featured List status: 1637: 1555:In 1923, a man named 1540:scored goals there, " 1491:News from the diamond 1403:contribute your ideas 1359:Issue I – July 2008 1356: 1279:New York Yankees GA/R 1263:Articles for Deletion 1251:What Knowledge is not 921:encyclopedia articles 444:Staten Island Yankees 1916:Battle of Ohio (MLB) 1783:Three Rivers Stadium 1627:Baseball WikiProject 1498:79 MLB All-star Game 1346:Baseball WikiProject 1332:WikiProject Baseball 1243:50 States in 50 Days 1232:50 States in 50 Days 1164:WikiProject Baseball 1034:Portal talk:Baseball 436:Charleston RiverDogs 2211:arbitration process 1548:lead a band there, 1505:2008 Home Run Derby 1288:good article review 1213:Request for opinion 736:assuming good faith 470:minor league footer 411:Minor league system 2223:arbitration policy 2003:alerting you that 1908: 1639: 1562:New Yankee Stadium 1358: 1237:I have added a "{{ 785:. As a member of 751:World Series teams 452:Gulf Coast Yankees 136: 90: 44:Naming Conventions 33: 2174: 2107: 1990:Unreferenced BLPs 1912:proposed deletion 1896: 1895: 1871:Help to keep the 1843: 1801: 1745: 1701: 1588: 1587: 1546:John Philip Sousa 1485: 1424:1926 World Series 1324: 1247:proposed deletion 1219:Talk:Jake Daubert 1194: 1193: 1161:Greetings fellow 783:Template talk:MLB 716:Babe Ruth/rewrite 420:Columbus Clippers 166:Main rivals stuff 130: 36: 21: 2249: 2173: 2172: 2158: 2114: 2106: 2105: 2091: 2047: 2038: 2032: 2021:reliable sources 1998: 1951: 1950: 1944: 1880:From the Editors 1836: 1834: 1829: 1820: 1813: 1804: 1799:Homer at the Bat 1771:Rickey Henderson 1767:Harmon Killebrew 1753: 1709: 1699:Nashville Sounds 1697: 1685:Featured content 1628: 1619: 1606: 1603: 1600: 1595: 1582: 1580: 1575: 1520:From the Editors 1478: 1476: 1471: 1462: 1455: 1446: 1410:Featured content 1347: 1338: 1306: 1284:New York Yankees 1176:featured article 1158: 1156: 1149: 729:User:Number24165 699: 146: 135: 89: 87:Additional tips: 76:Community Portal 32: 28: 2257: 2256: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2248: 2247: 2246: 2231:the voting page 2197: 2115: 2048: 2036: 2034:unreferencedBLP 2030: 1992: 1948: 1942: 1941: 1901: 1832: 1827: 1825: 1818: 1807: 1791:Calgary Cannons 1779:Kinston Indians 1632: 1626: 1617: 1578: 1573: 1571: 1550:George Costanza 1474: 1469: 1467: 1460: 1449: 1351: 1345: 1336: 1281: 1235: 1215: 1201: 1154: 1147: 1067: 1037: 1012: 998: 960: 903: 819: 804: 779: 753: 732: 708: 697: 676: 657:Commander Keane 645: 570: 544:Oleg Alexandrov 532: 428:Trenton Thunder 374: 342: 214: 211: 196: 168: 155: 144: 137: 48:Manual of Style 34: 24:Hello, Win777, 19: 12: 11: 5: 2255: 2253: 2200: 2196: 2191: 2176: 2175: 2111:David Weathers 2108: 1991: 1988: 1926: 1925: 1900: 1897: 1894: 1893: 1882: 1881: 1877: 1876: 1869: 1868: 1867: 1864: 1861: 1858: 1851: 1850: 1845: 1751: 1750: 1707: 1706: 1695: 1694: 1691: 1687: 1686: 1682: 1681: 1678: 1674: 1673: 1669: 1668: 1665:The Dark Tower 1657: 1652: 1647: 1642: 1641: 1622: 1616: 1613: 1586: 1585: 1530:Yankee Stadium 1522: 1521: 1517: 1516: 1509:Justin Morneau 1501: 1493: 1492: 1487: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1436: 1431: 1426: 1421: 1412: 1411: 1407: 1406: 1399: 1392: 1388: 1387: 1383: 1382: 1376: 1371: 1366: 1361: 1360: 1341: 1335: 1329: 1280: 1277: 1234: 1229: 1214: 1211: 1200: 1195: 1192: 1191: 1159: 1146: 1143: 1125: 1124: 1119:66.254.235.231 1075:66.254.235.231 1071:Boston Red Sox 1066: 1061: 1036: 1031: 1011: 1008: 997: 992: 959: 956: 902: 899: 883: 882: 881: 880: 818: 815: 803: 801:Detroit Tigers 798: 791:66.167.139.143 778: 772: 752: 749: 731: 726: 707: 704: 675: 672: 644: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 636: 635: 617: 616: 615: 614: 596: 595: 569: 564: 540:recent changes 536:edit summaries 531: 528: 518: 517: 506: 505: 491: 490: 479: 478: 474: 473: 457: 455: 454: 446: 430: 422: 409: 408: 406: 394: 393: 390: 387: 377: 373: 370: 341: 338: 337: 336: 335: 334: 315: 306: 296: 286: 285: 284: 265: 236: 235: 213: 210: 195: 192: 167: 164: 154: 151: 133:Happy editing! 129: 128: 127: 126: 120: 114: 111: 108: 101: 84: 72:Policy Library 64:Reference Desk 35: 20: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2254: 2245: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2224: 2220: 2216: 2212: 2208: 2204: 2195: 2192: 2190: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2171: 2167: 2164: 2161: 2157: 2153: 2149: 2146: 2143: 2140: 2137: 2134: 2131: 2128: 2125: 2121: 2118: 2117:Find sources: 2112: 2109: 2104: 2100: 2097: 2094: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2079: 2076: 2073: 2070: 2067: 2064: 2061: 2058: 2054: 2051: 2050:Find sources: 2045: 2042: 2041: 2040: 2035: 2028: 2027: 2022: 2018: 2017:verifiability 2014: 2010: 2006: 2002: 1997: 1989: 1987: 1986: 1982: 1978: 1974: 1970: 1966: 1962: 1957: 1955: 1954:its talk page 1947: 1939: 1935: 1931: 1924: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1917: 1913: 1905: 1898: 1892: 1890: 1885: 1879: 1878: 1874: 1870: 1865: 1862: 1859: 1856: 1855: 1853: 1852: 1848: 1847: 1844: 1841: 1837: 1835: 1830: 1822: 1821: 1814: 1812: 1811: 1802: 1800: 1796: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1763:Dan Brouthers 1760: 1756: 1748: 1747: 1746: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1716: 1712: 1704: 1703: 1702: 1700: 1692: 1689: 1688: 1684: 1683: 1679: 1676: 1675: 1671: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1656: 1653: 1651: 1648: 1646: 1645: 1644: 1643: 1636: 1631: 1629: 1620: 1614: 1612: 1611: 1608: 1607: 1596: 1584: 1583: 1581: 1576: 1567: 1563: 1558: 1553: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1536:spoke there, 1535: 1531: 1526: 1519: 1518: 1514: 1513:Josh Hamilton 1510: 1506: 1502: 1499: 1495: 1494: 1490: 1489: 1486: 1483: 1479: 1477: 1472: 1464: 1463: 1456: 1454: 1453: 1440: 1437: 1435: 1432: 1430: 1427: 1425: 1422: 1420: 1419:Art Houtteman 1417: 1416: 1414: 1413: 1409: 1408: 1404: 1400: 1397: 1393: 1390: 1389: 1385: 1384: 1381: 1377: 1375: 1372: 1370: 1367: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1355: 1350: 1348: 1339: 1333: 1330: 1328: 1327: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1278: 1276: 1275: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1260: 1259:its talk page 1256: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1240: 1233: 1230: 1228: 1227: 1224: 1220: 1212: 1210: 1209: 1206: 1199: 1196: 1190: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1177: 1172: 1171: 1166: 1165: 1160: 1157: 1151: 1150: 1144: 1142: 1141: 1138: 1134: 1130: 1123: 1120: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1080: 1079: 1076: 1072: 1065: 1062: 1060: 1059: 1056: 1051: 1050: 1047: 1043: 1035: 1032: 1030: 1029: 1025: 1021: 1017: 1009: 1007: 1006: 1003: 996: 993: 991: 990: 987: 983: 979: 974: 973: 970: 966: 955: 954: 951: 946: 945: 942: 938: 935: 931: 927: 922: 918: 912: 911: 908: 900: 898: 897: 893: 889: 879: 876: 871: 870: 869: 868: 867: 866: 863: 857: 856: 853: 848: 847: 844: 839: 836: 832: 831:Manny Ramírez 827: 824: 816: 814: 813: 810: 802: 799: 797: 795: 792: 788: 784: 777: 773: 771: 770: 767: 762: 758: 757:Floydspinky71 750: 748: 747: 744: 741: 737: 730: 727: 725: 724: 721: 717: 713: 705: 703: 701: 700: 693: 689: 685: 681: 673: 671: 670: 667: 662: 661: 658: 654: 650: 643:Texas Rangers 642: 634: 631: 627: 623: 622: 621: 620: 619: 618: 613: 610: 607: 604: 600: 599: 598: 597: 594: 591: 587: 586: 585: 584: 581: 578: 575: 568: 565: 563: 562: 559: 554: 553: 549: 545: 541: 537: 529: 527: 526: 523: 516: 513: 508: 507: 502: 501: 500: 499: 496: 489: 486: 481: 480: 476: 475: 471: 467: 466: 465: 464: 461: 453: 450: 447: 445: 441: 440:Tampa Yankees 437: 434: 431: 429: 426: 423: 421: 418: 415: 414: 413: 412: 403: 402: 399: 391: 388: 385: 384: 383: 381: 372:MLB infoboxes 371: 369: 368: 365: 361: 356: 352: 351: 348: 339: 333: 330: 326: 325: 324: 321: 316: 314: 311: 307: 305: 302: 297: 295: 292: 287: 283: 280: 275: 274: 273: 270: 266: 264: 261: 256: 255: 254: 253: 250: 246: 243: 240: 234: 231: 226: 225: 224: 223: 220: 209: 208: 205: 201: 193: 191: 190: 187: 183: 178: 177: 174: 165: 163: 161: 152: 150: 148: 141: 134: 125: 121: 119: 115: 112: 109: 106: 102: 99: 95: 94: 92: 91: 88: 83: 81: 77: 73: 69: 65: 61: 57: 53: 49: 45: 41: 31: 30:to Knowledge! 29: 16: 2198: 2177: 2165: 2159: 2151: 2144: 2138: 2132: 2126: 2116: 2098: 2092: 2084: 2077: 2071: 2065: 2059: 2049: 2024: 2004: 1993: 1958: 1927: 1922: 1909: 1886: 1883: 1824: 1816: 1809: 1808: 1803: 1775:Billy Pierce 1752: 1708: 1696: 1661:Stephen King 1654: 1649: 1623: 1591: 1589: 1570: 1554: 1523: 1466: 1458: 1451: 1450: 1445: 1373: 1368: 1342: 1304:TonyTheTiger 1292:good quality 1282: 1236: 1216: 1202: 1174: 1168: 1162: 1132: 1126: 1081: 1068: 1052: 1038: 1013: 999: 995:World Demise 975: 961: 947: 930:historically 929: 925: 920: 913: 904: 884: 858: 849: 840: 834: 828: 820: 805: 780: 776:Template:MLB 754: 733: 709: 695: 677: 664:Okay. =) -- 663: 646: 571: 555: 533: 519: 492: 456: 448: 432: 424: 416: 410: 404: 395: 375: 357: 353: 343: 237: 215: 197: 181: 179: 169: 156: 138: 132: 118:New User Log 86: 60:Village pump 37: 23: 2142:free images 2075:free images 2044:Tony Womack 1205:WhisperToMe 1198:Miho Nosaka 823:Akron Aeros 817:Akron Aeros 740:FreplySpang 720:djrobgordon 556:Yep. =) -- 329:Gateman1997 320:Gateman1997 291:Gateman1997 279:Gateman1997 260:Gateman1997 230:Gateman1997 219:Gateman1997 212:Oakland A's 2219:topic bans 1946:dated prod 1795:Hugh Daily 1787:Bill Lange 1630:Newsletter 1566:this place 1380:Yogi Berra 1349:Newsletter 1334:Newsletter 1223:MisfitToys 901:Danys Báez 766:MisfitToys 761:Yogi Berra 738:with him. 698:Googie Man 692:Wikicities 680:Googie Man 678:Hi Win77, 182:everyone's 145:Μελ Ετητης 140:Mel Etitis 2215:site bans 2178:Thanks!-- 1973:consensus 1810:Wizardman 1557:Babe Ruth 1511:defeated 1452:Wizardman 1181:Wknight94 950:Cs-wolves 907:Cs-wolves 892:WP:VANITY 875:Nick22aku 809:Wahkeenah 712:Babe Ruth 706:Babe Ruth 512:CrazyTalk 485:CrazyTalk 398:CrazyTalk 204:Wahkeenah 200:Uncle Sam 186:Wahkeenah 173:Wahkeenah 1759:Cy Young 1525:Baseball 1170:WP:BBAID 1155:Baseball 1002:Tyrenius 862:Dakern74 843:Dakern74 841:Thanks. 603:ςפקιДИτς 574:ςפקιДИτς 347:Friejose 70:and the 68:Tutorial 40:continue 17:Welcome! 2180:DASHBot 2148:WP refs 2136:scholar 2081:WP refs 2069:scholar 1875:updated 1833:ngold29 1579:ngold29 1532:. Four 1475:ngold29 1088:WP:CITE 1064:Yankees 969:Warrens 926:Current 194:Yankees 153:Mercora 105:Sandbox 56:the FAQ 27:Welcome 2205:. The 2120:Google 2053:Google 2011:. The 1977:Mosmof 1936:" and 1823:, and 1465:, and 1271:Oo7565 1253:" and 1137:Win777 1108:Win777 1055:Win777 1042:WP:1.0 1020:Ral315 986:Win777 941:Win777 917:WP:NOT 896:Win777 888:WP:NOT 852:Win777 835:should 743:(talk) 688:Angela 666:Win777 630:Win777 590:Win777 558:Win777 522:Win777 495:Win777 460:Win777 376:Hello, 364:Win777 310:Win777 301:Win777 269:Win777 249:Win777 217:field. 160:Aghose 2163:JSTOR 2124:books 2096:JSTOR 2057:books 1828:Black 1819:jj137 1594:jj137 1574:Black 1534:popes 1470:Black 1461:jj137 1127:From 1106:. -- 976:From 939:. -- 684:Jimbo 358:From 2239:talk 2184:talk 2156:FENS 2130:news 2089:FENS 2063:news 1981:talk 1624:The 1602:talk 1590:-- 1538:Pelé 1503:The 1496:The 1394:The 1343:The 1302:. -- 1300:here 1296:here 1239:prod 1185:talk 1129:WP:V 1094:and 1024:talk 1016:here 686:and 649:diff 548:talk 380:here 54:and 52:Help 2199:Hi, 2170:TWL 2103:TWL 2026:686 2001:bot 1317:bio 1046:Joe 1018:. 628:-- 417:AAA 2241:) 2217:, 2186:) 2150:) 2113:- 2083:) 2046:- 2037:}} 2031:{{ 1983:) 1956:. 1949:}} 1943:{{ 1910:A 1815:, 1797:, 1793:, 1789:, 1785:, 1781:, 1777:, 1773:, 1769:, 1765:, 1761:, 1757:, 1741:, 1737:, 1733:, 1729:, 1725:, 1721:, 1717:, 1713:, 1659:— 1457:, 1378:- 1323:) 1269:. 1187:) 1026:) 936:, 796:. 550:) 442:, 438:, 425:AA 244:, 241:, 2237:( 2182:( 2166:· 2160:· 2152:· 2145:· 2139:· 2133:· 2127:· 2122:( 2099:· 2093:· 2085:· 2078:· 2072:· 2066:· 2060:· 2055:( 2005:2 1979:( 1842:. 1667:) 1663:( 1605:) 1599:( 1484:. 1405:! 1319:/ 1315:/ 1313:c 1311:/ 1309:t 1307:( 1183:( 1022:( 609:☻ 606:☺ 580:☻ 577:☺ 546:( 449:R 433:A 147:) 142:( 107:. 100:. 82:.

Index

Welcome
continue
Naming Conventions
Manual of Style
Help
the FAQ
Village pump
Reference Desk
Tutorial
Policy Library
Community Portal
my New-Users' Talk Page
assigning those to your username
Sandbox
New User Log
Knowledge:Contributing to articles outside your native language
Mel Etitis
Μελ Ετητης)
Aghose
Wahkeenah
17:27, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
Wahkeenah
17:32, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
Uncle Sam
Wahkeenah
02:55, 1 August 2005 (UTC)
Gateman1997
17:21, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
Gateman1997
17:38, 23 August 2005 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.