147:
Editors who thinks that the policy needs to be improved rather than killed by an unfair poll at the beginning of the proposal, started another poll ('Do we really need a poll at this stage?') at the same time. The poll is vandalized for a while but it is stable now. A NO vote on this ('Do we really
143:
Unfortunately, a pro-porn and pro-offense lobby is trying to make this proposal a failure. They unilaterally started an approval poll although almost no one including me believe that it is time for a vote, simply because the policy is not ready. It is not even written completely.
21:
112:
in which there was broad support for a block for your disruptive activities with respect to various AfD discussions, I'm blocking you for 48 hours. You may be blocked again if you resume disruptive activities.
140:
to state the existing policies coherently and make suggestions on improving the editorial standards in Wiki. I thought you might be interested in contributing to that proposal.
79:
Suspected is an understatement. Jason, are you really that dim, or are you so arrogant as to think no one would snag you? Go ahead, report this a a personal attack. Please.
155:
with your suggestions on the policy. We have two subpages: Arguments and
Sections. You might want to consider reviewing these pages as well...
88:
Yes, suspected is an understatement. Wiggie, I would advise you to admit that you are Jason. You virtually did so on my talk page already.
48:
148:
need a poll now?') poll will strengthen the position of the editors who are willing to improve the ethics policy further.
36:
58:
118:
152:
137:
127:
114:
151:
If you have concerns about the ethics and editorial standards in Wiki, please visit the page
30:
159:
109:
40:
93:
80:
20:
89:
67:
be done. If you disagree with the block, contact another administrator.
162:
121:
98:
83:
47:
or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from
15:
43:. To contest this block, please reply here on your
8:
7:
63:Unblocking yourself should almost
14:
19:
1:
39:for violating policy against
122:01:49, 23 January 2006 (UTC)
99:15:15, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
84:01:14, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
37:Knowledge's blocking policy
178:
163:01:01, 23 March 2006 (UTC)
18:
136:We started a proposal
153:Knowledge:Wikiethics
138:Knowledge:Wikiethics
128:Knowledge:Wikiethics
108:After discussion on
158:Thanks in advance.
35:in accordance with
104:Wiki 4 Christ Spam
96:
73:
72:
169:
94:
23:
16:
177:
176:
172:
171:
170:
168:
167:
166:
131:
106:
12:
11:
5:
175:
173:
160:Resid Gulerdem
130:
125:
105:
102:
74:
71:
70:
69:
68:
52:
29:You have been
24:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
174:
165:
164:
161:
156:
154:
149:
145:
141:
139:
134:
129:
126:
124:
123:
120:
116:
111:
103:
101:
100:
97:
91:
86:
85:
82:
77:
66:
62:
60:
55:
54:
53:
50:
46:
42:
38:
34:
33:
32:
25:
22:
17:
157:
150:
146:
142:
135:
132:
115:Tony Sidaway
107:
87:
78:
75:
64:
56:
44:
41:sockpuppetry
28:
27:
26:
76:Talk page
49:this list
45:talk page
81:Jim62sch
57:Note to
110:WP:AN/I
31:blocked
59:sysops
65:never
133:Hi,
119:Talk
95:talk
90:AvB
113:--
92:÷
117:|
61::
51:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
