User talk:WikiRedactor/Archive 4

108:

situation is appropriate when deciding what is best. American Horror Story has a separate article for each of its iterations (e.g. Coven, Asylum, Freak Show) and then another article for the blanket of series (simply titled American Horror Story). I will keep the "K and K" page up because I think you're right that grouping them together creates a valuable article. I just think it is better as a supplement rather than a replacement. Also, the "K and K Take" name is not in any third-party sources to the best of my knowledge. I think naming the article that is a form of original research. Perhaps a better name would be "The Kardashians Take" or simply "Keeping up with the Kardashian spinoffs" -

972: 295:), who have been WikiCup judges since 2009 and 2010 respectively, are stepping down. This decision has been made for a number of reasons, but the main one is time. Both Josh and Ed have found that, over the previous year, they have been unable to devote the time necessary to the WikiCup, and it is not likely that they will be able to do this in the near future. Furthermore, new people at the helm can only help to invigorate the WikiCup and keep it dynamic. Josh and Ed will still be around, and will likely be participating in the Cup this following year as competitors, which is where both started out. 2137: 1415: 2152: 1116: 1008: 2116: 1443: 984: 2214: 1489: 1280: 2256: 2372: 31: 1513:

through to the third round, a minimum score of 55 was required for a wildcard competitor to go through. We had a three-way tie at 55 points and all three have qualified for the next round, in the spirit of fairness. The third round ends on June 28, with the top two in each group progressing automatically while the remaining 16 highest scorers across all four groups go through as wildcards. Good luck to all competitors for the third round!

2823: 2611: 2407: 1860: 1804: 1748: 918: 862: 394: 2669: 2101: 1022: 627: 1072: 2352: 1666: 2231: 2189: 1093: 2172: 1464: 1043: 2273: 620: 1396: 2630:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 2426:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1879:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1823:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 1767:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 937:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 881:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 555: 597: 1621: 535: 1378: 528: 2840:, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. 1724:

for the same reason- sorry! Basically, screenshots are rarely justified on episode articles- there is no assumption in their favour, in the way that there is an assumption in favour of (say) posters/DVD covers on film articles. Instead, screenshots can only be used when they illustrate something that

1512:

The points varied across groups, with the lowest score required to gain automatic qualification was 68 in Group A - meanwhile the second place score in Group H was 404, which would have been high enough to win all but one of the other Groups! As well as the top two of each group automatically going

107:

Hi, I noticed that you deleted the individual "K and K" articles and merged them into a single article. I have restored the old pages because the old pages did contain information that was not on the new "K and K" page. I understand that all the series are similar, but I think looking at a similar

717:

Remember that only the top 64 scoring competitors will make it through to the second round, and one of the new changes this year is that all scores must be claimed within two weeks of an article's promotion or appearance, so don't forget to add them to your submissions pages! If you are concerned

979:

That's it, the first round is done, sign-ups are closed and we're into round 2. 64 competitors made it into this round, and are now broken into eight groups of eight. The top two of each group will go through to round 3, and then the top scoring 16 "wildcards" across all groups. Round 1 saw some

2147:), who is competing in his sixth consecutive Wikicup final, again finished the round in first place, with an impressive 1666 points in Pool B. Casliber writes about the natural sciences, including ornithology, botany and astronomy. A large bulk of his points this round were bonus points. 2037:

Most of the album is junk, in my humble opinion, but a couple of the tracks stand out. Actually, now knowing that "Dooo It!" is the lead single, it may be appropriate to start a standalone article sooner than later. Surely the song will receive reviews, as will the music video and her VMA

501: 2065:

I think a good portion of the album could benefit from some more editing, but that's the glory of being Miley Cyrus and being able to do whatever you want :) RCA doesn't care because it doesn't count as an album under their contract so it doesn't hurt them lol

1995:

Thanks. I just couldn't find an official confirmation, so I didn't know if perhaps it was a promotional single. This is a bizarre project. I am not even much of a MC fan but I am curious to see what comes of this recording. Thanks for your work on the article!

552:!!! Best wishes to you, your family and relatives this holiday season! Take this opportunity to bond with your loved ones, whether or not you are celebrating Christmas. This is a special time for everybody, and spread the holiday spirit to everybody out there! 1725:

cannot be understood without being seen, and needs to be understood. This is very different from being, for example, screenshots of very important scenes. The fact a scene is important does not necessarily mean that we need a non-free image of it.

1411:

The second round one has all wrapped up, and round three has now begun! Congratulations to the 34 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our second round. Leading the way overall was

2765: 420:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

321:

and talk pages. While it may be impossible to please everyone, the judges will make every effort to ensure that the new rules are both fair and in the best interests of the competition, which is, first and foremost, about improving Knowledge

710:. There have been changes to to several of the points scores for various categories, and the addition of Peer Reviews for the first time. These will work in the same manner as Good Article Reviews, and all of the changes are summarised 189: 170: 310:) to form the 2015 WikiCup judging team. Jason is a WikiCup veteran, having won in 2010 and finishing in fifth this year. Christine has participated in two WikiCups, reaching the semi-finals in both, and is responsible for the 2130:

The scores required to move onto the semifinals were impressive; the lowest scorer to move onto the finals was 407, making this year's Wikicup as competitive as it's always been. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:

2183:), first in Pool A, came in third. His specialty is natural science articles; in Round 4, he mostly submitted articles about insects and botany. Five out of the six of the GAs he submitted were level-4 vital articles. 1349: 1331: 1298: 248: 2514:

Hah! Are you enjoying the album? I think it is beautiful, but I have to admit, after heading "High by the Beach" I was hoping for a bit more pop infusion. Same old classic hipster LDR, but I still love her music.

2288:

The intense competition between RO and Calvin999 will continue into the finals. They're both eligible for the Newcomers Trophy, given for the first time in the Wikicup; whoever makes the most points will win it.

424:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

2247: 722:. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAN, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on 2843:

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

2717: 2378: 1059: 2264: 1682:. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from 2127:) at 864 points, who although submitted just 2 FAs for 400 points, earned double that amount for those articles in bonus points. Everyone who moved forward to Round 4 earned at least 100 points. 147: 2243: 2222: 1458:. Remember, you do not need to work on an article on your own - as long as each person has completed significant work on the article during 2015, multiple competitors can claim the same article. 1030: 825:

Hello, it's been a bit. Just letting you know that while I unfortunately failed its GAN on January 31st, this article has drastically improved in recent months largely thanks to you. See

228: 2180: 1472: 1404: 1051: 704:

Round one of the 2015 WikiCup has begun! So far we've had around 80 signups, which close on February 5. If you have not already signed up and want to do so, then you can add your name

2094:

The finals for the 2015 Wikicup has now begun! Congrats to the 8 contestants who have survived to the finals, and well done and thanks to everyone who took part in rounds 3 and 4.

2281: 2124: 1451: 2144: 2109: 1497: 1422: 992: 1598:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

1160:, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from 1152:

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on

2197: 2159: 1636: 1123: 1080: 1015: 2872:

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in

2239: 1101: 2242:), from Pool A, likes to work on articles about British geography and places. Most of his points this round were earned from two impressive accomplishments: a GT about 1693:

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our

417: 277:

Hello everyone, and may we wish you all a happy holiday season. As you will probably already know, the 2015 WikiCup begins in the new year; there is still time to

2225:), from Pool A, was our highest-scoring wildcard. West Virginia tends to focus on articles about the history of (what for it!) the U.S. state of West Virginia. 2112:) in Group B, who earned 1496 points. Although 913 of these points were bonus points, he submitted 15 articles in the DYK category. Second place overall was 1683: 1355:

Hey Wiki. Can you please check out the PR? I want to bring the article to FA, so I would like to see your comments how further to improve the prose. Thanks! —

311: 2267:), from Pool B, came in seventh overall. RO earned the majority of her points from GARs and PRs, many of which were earned in the final hours of the round. 406: 2740:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

1686:

is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an

1593: 1505: 154:

since it's GA and I want to promote to FA. I was wondering if you could please take a look and review it for me if you're not busy with anything. Cheers!

1687: 2727: 2642: 2438: 1891: 1835: 1779: 1694: 949: 893: 711: 169:

Thanks for taking the time for doing a peer review for the article (even though I could have just waited a bit longer). I went ahead and opened

2305: 1524: 1175: 1036:

In addition to Freikorp's work, some other important articles and pictures were improved during round one, here's a snapshot of a few of them:

780: 737: 2880: 1698: 1614: 718:

that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on

1261: 789: 330:, on their talk pages, or by email. We hope you will all join us in trying to make the 2015 WikiCup the most productive and enjoyable yet. 2884: 2737: 1245: 1161: 772: 333: 2333: 1564: 1215: 765: 489: 1678:. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Knowledge (XXG) may not meet the criteria required by 2097:

In round 3, we had a three-way tie for qualification among the wildcard contestants, so we had 34 competitors. The leader was by far

1530: 1181: 1001: 2861: 2284:), also from Pool B, who was competing with RO for the final two spots in the final hours, takes the race for most GARs and PRs—48. 776: 706: 279: 1297:, and for reviews deserving "nothing's more in the spirit of Knowledge (XXG)" (than pitching in on a GA review ...), - you are an 1367: 86: 81: 69: 64: 59: 1981:

Some news sites have referred to it as the "first single" from the project, I'll add in a reputable source using that language.

1941: 1570: 1257: 1221: 785: 698: 438: 1589: 2830: 2784: 2319: 1544: 1195: 842: 751: 668: 2697: 2687: 2626:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2422:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 2358: 1875:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1819:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1763:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 933:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 877:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 1690:; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale. 971: 317:

The discussions/polls concerning the next competition's rules will be closed soon, and rules changes will be made clear on

2450: 1914: 582: 448: 2675: 2631: 2427: 1880: 1824: 1768: 1679: 1146: 938: 882: 240: 1084: 1153: 719: 410: 318: 1721: 826: 151: 2418: 2361:, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Knowledge (XXG)'s 1871: 1674: 873: 2741: 2723: 2584: 2523: 2480: 2299: 2046: 2004: 1961: 1628: 1550: 1518: 1201: 1169: 731: 374: 38: 1063: 684: 507:

At this moment, the FLC is urgently needing comments. So, could you please cast an eye over it? Much appreciated,

231:; you may amend if necessary. Please check for dead links and other possible faults before the appearance date. 1933: 1815: 1717: 1157: 929: 723: 327: 2163: 1585: 1127: 2166:), second place both in Pool B and overall, earned the bulk of his points with FPs, mostly depicting currency. 1953:

On a related note, do you have a source to confirm that "Dooo It!" has actually been released as a single? ---

1504:

to Good Article for the maximum bonus. Hamilton was one of the founding fathers of the United States and is a

1294: 212: 2454: 2327: 2205: 2151: 1759: 1558: 1209: 1115: 1007: 759: 586: 485: 366: 2848: 477: 2668: 2555: 2505: 2071: 2028: 1986: 1339: 1309: 262: 236: 197: 178: 159: 47: 17: 2622: 2755: 2680: 2577: 2537: 2516: 2495: 2473: 2367: 2295: 2260: 2060: 2039: 2018: 1997: 1976: 1954: 1514: 1165: 727: 370: 303: 1436:

Special credit must be given to a number of high importance articles improved during the second round.

2692:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 1149:

is running through the month of March. Head there for further details - they even have actual prizes!

173:

for the article. I'd appreciate if you can comment, that is if you're not too busy right now. Cheers!

2387: 1921: 1327: 254: 1237: 2218: 1730: 1706: 1381: 459: 434: 342: 1425:) in Group B with a total of 777 points for a variety of contributions including Good Articles on 502:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Lorde/archive2

2778: 2323: 2313: 1554: 1538: 1501: 1232: 1205: 1189: 1026: 836: 807: 799: 755: 745: 662: 481: 362: 358: 350: 299: 113: 1279: 2731: 1005:

which qualified for a times-two multiplier. This is a higher score than in previous years, as

2892: 2707: 2551: 2501: 2446: 2067: 2024: 1982: 1603: 1335: 1305: 957: 901: 578: 258: 232: 193: 174: 155: 1141:, receiving the maximum bonus due to the number of Wikis that the related article appears in. 566: 2804: 2751: 2500:

No problem! It's the least I can do considering that Drake and Future will rob her of a #1.

2213: 1455: 1364: 133: 2371: 594:

Though it is quite early to say Happy New Year, hope you the best wishes on this New Year!

224: 216: 2866: 2837: 2796:

Thanks very much for your comments. They have been resolved. Would you like to revisit? --

2650: 2383: 2176: 1899: 1843: 1787: 1648: 1468: 1426: 1400: 1322: 1253: 1047: 2627: 2423: 1876: 1820: 1764: 1131: 996: 934: 878: 815: 604: 512: 2896: 2811: 2790: 2759: 2654: 2591: 2559: 2530: 2509: 2487: 2458: 2391: 2337: 2075: 2053: 2032: 2011: 1990: 1968: 1903: 1847: 1791: 1734: 1710: 1655: 1607: 1574: 1343: 1313: 1265: 961: 905: 848: 819: 793: 675: 608: 516: 493: 463: 442: 378: 266: 201: 182: 163: 136: 2277: 2120: 2023:

This record it crazy! I would love to see what becomes of this too, it's very strange.

1726: 1702: 1488: 1447: 455: 428: 338: 288: 124:

I gave responses to your queries on the article, you might want to check them up :). —

2720:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 2772: 2766:

Knowledge (XXG):Featured list candidates/List of songs recorded by Lady Gaga/archive1

2309: 2292:

Good luck to the finalists; the judges are sure that the competition will be fierce!

2255: 2140: 2105: 1534: 1493: 1418: 1389: 1228: 1185: 1135: 988: 830: 741: 656: 354: 346: 307: 292: 109: 619: 2888: 2442: 2193: 2155: 2115: 1599: 1442: 1430: 1119: 1076: 1011: 953: 897: 574: 401: 385: 2798: 1357: 1290: 1106: 626: 126: 46:

If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the

2200:), second in Pool A, took fourth overall. He tends to focus on articles about 810:

good article nomination, as you contributed a lot to the article. Much thanks,

2711: 2646: 1895: 1839: 1783: 1642: 1289:

Thank you for quality articles in collaboration on singers and albums such as

811: 600: 570: 508: 283:. We have a few important announcements concerning the future of the WikiCup. 99:

Please, do not remove neccessary information about her discography. Thannks!

2771:

Hello WikiRedactor! It's been a while. Would you mind reviewing this at FLC?

2887:

and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation.

2550:? I'm just really pissed that Target didn't have any bonus tracks this time 2362: 2235: 1480: 1476: 1097: 1055: 983: 1479:

to Good Article for a 3x bonus - and if that wasn't enough, they also took

2703: 2230: 2188: 2100: 1092: 1021: 980:

interesting work on some very important articles, with the round leader

651: 636: 2859:

of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a

1620: 1350:

Knowledge (XXG):Peer review/Don't Stop the Music (Rihanna song)/archive1

1018:) had 500 points in 2014 at the end of round 1, and our very own judge, 2272: 2201: 2136: 1414: 1071: 771:

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from

554: 596: 534: 1909:

A page you started (Miley Cyrus and Her Dead Petz) has been reviewed!

192:

again and was hoping if you could leave a comment once more. Thanks!

2851:

very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the

2818:

Image copyright problem with File:Walt Disney & Minnie Mouse.JPG

1377: 527: 326:

If you have any questions or concerns, the judges can be reached on

298:

In a similar vein, we hope you will all join us in welcoming Jason (

2343:

Miley Cyrus & Her Dead Petz has been nominated for Did You Know

454:

There is another ongoing move discussion; you can comment there. --

2171: 1661:

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:AllGoodThingsTheHills.jpg

1463: 1395: 1385: 1376: 1042: 970: 697: 2718:

Template:Did you know nominations/Miley Cyrus & Her Dead Petz

1104:) developed an extremely timely article to Good Article, taking 2879:

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the

2351: 2663: 2346: 975:

One of several of Godot13's quality submissions during round 1

25: 1627:

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect

726:

and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck!

449:

Talk:Edge of Seventeen (song)#Requested move 10 December 2014

2821: 2609: 2405: 1858: 1802: 1746: 1664: 1619: 916: 860: 696: 625: 618: 533: 526: 1928:

Nice start. I'd like to see the reviews of the album added.

806:

Hi, WikiRedactor. I have credited you as a co-nominator in

146:

Hello WikiRedactor! Long time no see! I have a requested a

829:

for my concerns, with the main issue being verifiability.

405:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

220: 332:

You are receiving this message because you are listed on

1392:; and is one of several Featured Pictures worked up by 654:, and thanks for your contributions to Knowledge (XXG). 2873: 399:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

2641: