325:, and attempt to get consensus? As I have stated, I am not happy with your massive restructuring, and at least one admin agrees. You have made false assertions about improvement and preserving information, when in fact you are not adhering to WP:MOS, and are in fact blanking useful information (such as the most basic: elements of a contract). I consider your blanking large sections of this article is more than just a bold edit. It is vandalism according to WP:VANDAL. Please stop and discuss FIRST. --
272:. Secondly, despite the assertion that nothing was deleted, things were. The prior article had a concise list of the elements of a contract (consideration, proper subject matter, competent adult parties, etc., under the heading "validity of contracts"), which is now gone. The preamble continues to get more muddled. I am suggesting a revert, and a) first a discussion of the proposed changes/reorg, and b) more incremental changes. --
205:
Hey there. Thanks for your (extensive) edits to the Law article, which are a huge improvement in many respects. There are one or two points I'd take issue with - I guess I'll raise these on the talk page for the article. Also thanks for the helpful message on my talk page. Again, there are one or two
117:
article. I agree that the older wording wasn't perfect, but I thought your re-wording lost some of the distinction between evolution and natural selection. It's a fine line for sure, but I thought your wording blurred it a bit. Sorry that I'm resorting to a talk message - my comment regarding my
356:
Hi again
Wikidea. Thanks for putting comments on the law template and the law article in response to mine. I'm going to roll over on this one because frankly I'm out of my depth. I just ask you to bear in mind that users will click to this article from all manner of other articles - including
179:
Why have you made major changes to the tort article without first dealing with my remarks on the talk page, or for that matter trying to discuss them? Some of what you have done is valuable, but much is not and some is simply legally wrong. Please try to work with others.
98:
You're right in saying that it's fairly difficult to find photos to put on
Knowledge (XXG). Most people are not aware of how long-reaching the copyright rules are. The safest solution is to take photographs ourselves, but it's not always an option.
357:
historical articles and ones which describe non-Western countries, religions etc. They need to then arrive at an article which is broad and baggy in its approach to what constitutes 'law'. I'm sure you get my point (see
136:. Knowledge (XXG) gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Knowledge (XXG), the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an
144:
indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
219:. Also, thanks for the suggestion that I do 'a little more reading', but my time is presently taken up by little else. I will, however, refer to your recommended texts as time allows.
190:
NB you replied on my user page -- I've moved the remarks to my talk page and responded there. You might find using four "~" symbols for your signature would be useful too!
376:
It's good, of late, to see you and some other users putting some work into this article, which was formerly a bit of an embarrassment. Well done!
215:
I think if you check the history you'll see I'd made several substantial edits, rewriting entire sections in places. And they weren't limited to
229:
Suggest you re-read the comment I made on the Law talk page that you're presumably alluding to. It is, as I was pointing out, wrong to say that
168:
225:
unless you've got some examples of where intentional harm to other people's property doesn't result in criminality, I wouldn't be so brash!
57:
37:
141:
42:
157:
137:
167:. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at
152:
269:
89:
Please do not upload pictures that you take from web sites unless you know well what you do with respect to copyright.
32:
79:
52:
239:
It's really important not to attempt a definition of law too, because that's what jurisprudence is about.
27:
377:
47:
83:
133:
100:
90:
321:
Wikidea, I am not happy with your edits. Can you a) propose the change you want to make FIRST on
306:
291:
231:
we may not intentionally harm others' interests without losing our liberty and becoming criminals
191:
181:
68:
343:
301:
I could meet you later in the week, say
Thursday or Friday. Is that going to be good for you?
17:
358:
243:
Disagree here, but get where you're coming from. Suggest discussion on the Law talk page.
164:
118:
revert seemed to get lost and doesn't appear in the article history. Best regards, --
322:
302:
287:
119:
64:
249:
Once again, thanks for the suggestions. Always good to get another's point of view.
380:
365:
362:
350:
347:
329:
326:
310:
295:
286:
Oh, are you in Sydney at the moment? Would it be easier to discuss this in person?
276:
273:
253:
250:
194:
184:
122:
103:
93:
114:
265:
86:
tag on it. Furthermore, content from the BBC is not public domain.
113:
Hi there. Just to say that I reverted your recent change to the
148:
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
206:
points I'd take issue with, which I guess I'll raise here:
211:
it doesn't help merely to criticise. It's better to do.
82:. This image was a clear copyright violation: it has a
8:
264:I see big problems with the recent edits to
217:cosmetic alterations to the first paragraph
58:Knowledge (XXG):What Knowledge (XXG) is not
169:Knowledge (XXG):Media copyright questions
268:. First, it does not conform to the
43:Knowledge (XXG):Neutral point of view
7:
158:Knowledge (XXG):Image copyright tags
128:License tagging for Image:1325.jpg
24:
80:Image:39648813_chirac_afp_203.jpg
153:Knowledge (XXG):Image use policy
270:Knowledge (XXG):Manual_of_Style
171:. 02:04, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
163:This is an automated notice by
1:
381:09:42, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
277:03:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
254:18:36, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
123:10:37, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
366:09:19, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
351:10:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
330:03:46, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
311:07:56, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
296:01:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
195:19:02, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
185:12:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
104:16:25, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
94:11:26, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
396:
53:Knowledge (XXG):Wikiquette
342:I left a comment for you
48:Knowledge (XXG):Civility
38:Policies and Guidelines
346:, please respond. Ta,
142:image description page
317:vandalism of contract
132:Thanks for uploading
260:Edits to Contract
18:User talk:Wikidea
387:
378:Metamagician3000
395:
394:
390:
389:
388:
386:
385:
384:
374:
337:
319:
284:
262:
203:
177:
140:applied to the
130:
111:
76:
33:Manual of Style
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
393:
391:
373:
370:
369:
368:
336:
333:
318:
315:
314:
313:
283:
280:
261:
258:
247:
246:
245:
244:
236:
235:
234:
222:
221:
220:
202:
199:
198:
197:
176:
173:
161:
160:
155:
134:Image:1325.jpg
129:
126:
110:
107:
101:David.Monniaux
91:David.Monniaux
75:
72:
61:
60:
55:
50:
45:
40:
35:
30:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
392:
383:
382:
379:
372:Jurisprudence
371:
367:
364:
360:
355:
354:
353:
352:
349:
345:
340:
334:
332:
331:
328:
324:
323:Talk:Contract
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
299:
298:
297:
293:
289:
281:
279:
278:
275:
271:
267:
259:
257:
255:
252:
242:
241:
240:
237:
232:
228:
227:
226:
223:
218:
214:
213:
212:
209:
208:
207:
200:
196:
193:
192:Francis Davey
189:
188:
187:
186:
183:
182:Francis Davey
174:
172:
170:
166:
159:
156:
154:
151:
150:
149:
146:
143:
139:
135:
127:
125:
124:
121:
116:
108:
106:
105:
102:
96:
95:
92:
87:
85:
81:
73:
71:
70:
66:
59:
56:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
39:
36:
34:
31:
29:
26:
25:
19:
375:
341:
338:
335:Law template
320:
285:
263:
248:
238:
230:
224:
216:
210:
204:
178:
175:Tort article
162:
147:
131:
112:
97:
88:
77:
74:Chirac photo
62:
361:for more!)
282:Re:contract
201:Law article
78:I deleted
69:Talk to me
165:OrphanBot
138:image tag
115:Evolution
109:Evolution
28:Help Desk
303:enochlau
288:enochlau
266:Contract
120:Plumbago
65:Utcursch
363:Andeggs
348:Andeggs
327:Bhuston
274:Bhuston
251:Crebbin
16:<
359:here
344:here
339:Hi,
307:talk
292:talk
84:AFP
63:--
309:)
294:)
256:.
67:|
305:(
290:(
233:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.