2874:), Kramer, Kroll, and Rostal (among others) have written on them. Any of these authors might have books available online (just search for their name and Beethoven's in electronic libraries). Besides those, there's a John Matthews compilation probably more of historical interest. And Szigeti wrote about them also, but more from his perspective as a violinist. Angus Watson wrote about them in the context of Beethoven's chamber music more generally. Kaplan discussed them some in his Cambridge Companion contribution (available on archive.org). A good public or university library would either have them or get them scanned or loaned for you. JSTOR will also give you access to many articles, but their digital holdings can be limited, and it would likely be easier to work from a book at the beginning.
1620:
1060:
be banned, and it continues even after I tried dispute resolution. I truly do not believe any of the accusations have any good reason to them; I'm not always perfect but I do try to learn from my mistakes. I'm sorry if it takes up some of people's time but I genuinely believe that the last resort is the appropriate option here. I do not want this drama at all, I just want to make edits in peace and for everyone to get along, but I've already seen dispute resolution wouldn't solve that.
1537:
tens of thousands of edits. If you continue to make big changes without talkpage approval and discussion first, you will continue to be a timesink, and likely eventually be taken to a noticeboard and assessed as to whether you are a net negative or a net positive to
Knowledge (XXG). Knowledge (XXG) is run by volunteers, and we do not have time to babysit and correct the destructive actions of persons who have been repeatedly advised and warned and yet continue on the same path.
81:
3317:
834:
2489:
3266:
reflects sources. So adding items without citing a source that does the same is making more work for others to do, and gradually making the article harder to manageâthat's why there's an impulse to revert what seem like unsourced additions made for no clear reason beyond the personal tastes of the editor. I don't want to come off as harsh, but please try to understand why we may have the stances we do.
1726:
matter of personal opinion I think that linking "composers" to a timeline of composers could be a useful tool to show the person when the people talked about were/are alive. Again, I still follow the wikipedia rules even if I don't agree with them, which (if I recall correctly) is why I stopped when I Graham87 explained why the rules say that "composers" may need to be linked to "composer" instead.
1674:(Little lesson on the side: don't put blank lines in discussions. The program that reads to people with impaired vision is confused by blank lines.) I don't want to appear like a teacher, but share experiences that might help. I don't remember having "confronted" you (in the sense I understand that word). I saw you doing something that contradicted a guideline (linking a common word,
23:
841:
3211:
the reason I'm leaving. Again, from the beginning the plan was to stay on here for a relatively short period of time and get certain things done. And like I said, I understand if you guys can't do the things I requested. I'll see if I have time to color code the 20th century timeline myself, and if I
1846:
means in
Knowledge (XXG) speak, that it's not just reading an article and say it's good but review it against criteria. What can we do now? - I'll do my morning routine, and hope to hear from you. You will need to make firm promises to really slow down and to learn and listen more if you want to stay
1643:
I am sorry that you feel stressed and that I seem to have contributed to that. I don't go to arbitration. Period. (Hammersoft knows why.) But I am willing to listen to you here. I hope I'll find you also willing to listen. English is not my first language which may be in the way of our communication.
1510:
it is to be hoped that this has been a learning experience. You aren't being blocked right now, with the expectation that things will improve going forward. Whether that happens or not is entirely up to you, but if you really take in all the quality advice you've been given it shouldn't be difficult.
1224:
I've closed the ANI thread you opened as it was clearly not going anywhere. I've also commented at the ArbCom filing urging the committee to just reject the case, which I expect they will do shortly, although if you commented that you were withdrawing it that would probably speed that along. I think
1059:
I don't think people understand this but the false accusations are causing me perhaps even an extreme amount of emotional distress. I've spent hours and hours making edits trying to make articles better, and I'm being told that I'm wasting everyone's time, that my edits are useless, and that I should
2574:
copies its content from
Knowledge (XXG) (it says so at the bottom of the page and it's formatted just like a Knowledge (XXG) article). Honestly, I'd be extremely wary of adding citations to articles just because they have citation needed tags unless you've extensively researched the subject, in many
2436:
I do not know how much access to reference material you already have, but
Knowledge (XXG) has a great library card that provides on-line data bases that include JStore and many other collections. You are editing Classical Music articles quite a bit. When you have been here longer and can show a need
1938:
I am willing to accept these. As for the
Beethoven legacy thing, the fact that it needed more information was not brought up by me, but by someone else (I don't remember who, it may have been Aza who said they may start working on it in December). Aza also explained to me why the sandbox wasn't good
3140:
I am sorry that we seem to have disappointed you, and will miss you and your dedication. But why leave? You could just not edit for a while, until you find a mistake that needs to be fixed, or see a red link that you could fill. What you can't do is expect that others do work for you ;) - I have my
2036:
See the Main page, and my user page, and my talk page, or wait for two days ;) - The part ("anybody ... can review") will stay as long as nobody complains, but as an estimated 99.5% percent know the background and won't misunderstand it, why not keep it simple? What would you say, without making it
994:
I just happened to refresh my watchlist and saw your filing at the top of it (ArbCom, as is AN/I, are highly watch-listed pages), so forgive the otherwise-unsolicited advice. I'm not sure that the greatest response to being called a "timesink" is to cause people to spend further time than they have
226:
I would agree that Joplin would be hard to decide, however I'd argue that he does belong on this list. His form is similar to that of
Classical music. He considered himself to be a classical musician and wrote an Opera called Treemonisha. Also, He may have influenced other composers such as Debussy
196:
I'm not saying Joplin is not relevant (he definitely is a huge figure), it's just that his primary contributions and influence lie in the genre of ragtime, distinct from what is traditionally defined as classical music. It's a list of (western) classical music composers after all, Joplin is not one
3329:
This is for editors who have persevered through mistakes and challenges throughout their
Knowledge (XXG) career but have overcome them. Seeing you continue editing after your many hiccups and the Admin's Noticeboard thread is great to see. I hope you stay to improve the encyclopedia in the future.
1362:
I see... When asked about what was wrong about
Beethoven's article, I was told that it was the legacy section that needed work, and it seriously does need many revisions. What you're saying makes sense: even if many people show me sources, being writing vast majority of the legacy section probably
1725:
I agree that the word "composer" itself is a common word and should not be linked most of the time. And if you and Graham87 say the rules say that you shouldn't link "composers" to a timeline of composers, then I will probably believe you as you are far more experienced than I am. I will say as a
1659:
Thank you. I am also indeed willing to listen (even though I may not agree on everything). For example, I agree that when you confronted me about linking the word "composers" after redirecting the link, I should've stopped until I resolved the issue with you. To be honest, I'm not even sure why I
1536:
You shouldn't "try to", you should ALWAYS ask for approval before making big changes. This goes for all editors, but especially for new editors, and most especially for editors who have only been here a month. You are getting advice from editors who have been here well over a decade and made many
1102:
premature. There is absolutely ZERO chance it will be accepted because it is so dramatically premature. I'm sorry your experiencing emotional distress from this. Really, I am. I think your best course of action is to withdraw the RFAR, and then just step back for a while, maybe not edit for a few
999:
of how tedious and time-consuming the process is. I have no opinion on the dispute itself, but I would highly recommend withdrawing the ArbCom case and letting the ANI thread run its course. Cases usually get brought to ANI (or other relevant noticeboards) several times before ArbCom is invoked.
2690:
Thank you for your kind words and for standing up for me. I don't mind moving your tutorials to my subpage if you think it will help me understand
Knowledge (XXG) better. As for the edit summary, are you talking about for replies? Because I believe I do use edit summaries when editing articles.
2093:
Yes, and that is true, however: against those criteria. Have you looked at someone else's GA review in the meantime? I have never undertaken a GA review, simply because I am not a native speaker of
English and could not do justice to the prose. Judging the reliability of sources and licenses of
3265:
is not a healthy stance to be making with your contributionsâyour changes keep getting reverted because you are not supplying sources. Sources are important for obvious information tooâif we want to make an article really good, we have to make sure all the information is arranged in a way that
1692:
When I used the word "confront", I did not intend to mean hostile, although that word can be used to mean that. I meant to say you asked me to not do that, and I wasn't sure what word would be best. Usedtobecool used the word "warned", but I don't think that applies either. I apologize for the
1239:
As for the arbitration, although I feel like many of the problems have been disputed peacefully, there are still some questions I hope to be answered there, especially about whether I'll be blocked from editing, which has been suggested by Graham87 (but I'm not sure if he means it anymore) and
1922:
I remember when I was a new editor. My first article was deleted. I didn't like that Knowledge (XXG) says Op. 111 with a comma where I was used to op. 111 without comma, but accepted. I thought that bold titles for compositions would look nicer than italics, but accepted. What can you accept?
1080:
Also, this isn't just about me. It's safe to say there are a lot of people new to Knowledge (XXG); while some or even most of them may show they're new, there will likely be others who may come off more like an experienced user even though they're not. Knowing how horrible I feel about these
230:
As for the other ones you listed, I'm reading into composers on this list, so I'll probably need a couple of days or weeks until I get to these composers. In the meantime if you're sure we should remove them then you can go ahead, and I'll probably check on these composers in the future.
2637:. I am trying to set up a massive set of Knowledge (XXG) How-tos, tutorials, guides, policies, etc. For my own use. When I finish cutting out the duplicated material and mistakes. I can show you to move it to a sub-page of your user pageâthe material is quite long. There is even more at
1162:
Quite the opposite. You said Knowledge (XXG) is currently causing you an "extreme amount of emotional distress". Stepping away for a few days would help to alleviate that. Knowledge (XXG) isn't all that important to any single one of us. If we start to think it is, we need to step away.
535:
I am flattered that you think that some of my edits make you think I'm not new here. Before creating this account and editing on wikipedia, I've done a lot of reading on articles so perhaps that would explain it. I've also read a little about classes since I find that to be interesting.
639:(Please note that blank lines between posts confuse the editor program.) For Mozart - if I remember it right - there was first a discussion. Also I don't believe that the photo of an aging man which shows more a garden than his face, is a "better" portrait of him, historical or not. --
1678:), I tried the usual information in the edit summary of my revert (as Hammersoft also explained), but you kept doing the same thing, which made me come to this talk page, see above. There's nothing confrontational in the process that I see. Can we agree this far, or what do I miss? --
1336:). As an experienced editor, I wouldn't even expect to be able to make such a contribution without literal months of specialised musicological research at a university graduate level. If you're serious about contributing here, find a piece you like and expand info about it with more
771:
Sure, I will ask in project composers. I don't think asking the readers is the best idea: while we should value their thoughts, they will usually will pick based on conveniency rather than accuracy. Also, any reader is welcome to join the discussion and edit unless they are banned.
427:
Every article has useful information, otherwise it would be deleted. I've gone through your edits and I'm struggling to think of a reason why you should be allowed to continue editing here; you've spent too much of your time creating work for other editors and wasting their time.
653:
Even though there was a discussion first for Mozart, the former portrait is far more well known and a much "better" portrait (the one that was decidedly used was a zoom in on his phase from a portrait with his family). Shouldn't we stay consistent across policies we put fourth?
786:
When an article has a title which is a singular common count noun, the plural always redirects to the singular. When an article has a title which is a plural common count noun, the singular always redirects to the plural. Trying to redirect the plural to a list was bizarre.
38:. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be
2979:
Just as the title says, I'm planning on leaving Knowledge (XXG), most likely indefinitely. It was never my intention to be on here for a super long time as there are other things that are more important to me. I mainly wanted to help with major issues I saw and with the
2896:
Hey man. Just wanted to say that the colon for your smiley face on your user page is invisible because of the indents that they leave in the source code. Unless you wanna keep the invisible comma for comedic effect, you can surround the source code with <nowiki:
303:
Sorry, I reverted you twice and thought the edit summary was clear enough. Monteverdi: when a common word - such as "composer" is not linked in the first sentence, there's no need to link it later one. Knowledge (XXG) has problems, but this is not one of them. --
3005:
already said they will start working on it in December (thank you Aza24), maybe some of you guys could help them. Also, I would suggest doing a reevaluation on the article after completing it - maybe you guys could get it to good article or even featured status.
3165:
Sad to hear that you're leaving! As Gerda said, now that you know a little bit more about editing, you can always do little contributions from time to time whenever you see something that could be improved. Wishing you all the best in whatever comes next. â
848:
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Knowledge (XXG), Wikieditor662! Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Knowledge (XXG):
2227:" would also work, - I think that readers that far into an article about a composer may know what tenor means, and if the don't they could click on Pears and probably find it linked there. You wouldn't say "He knew Verdi, who was a composer", right? --
442:
I have created a ton of useful edits for wikipedia, including adding sources and information to many articles about composers (and if you actually looked at everything I did you would know that) and people would agree I have improved multiple
1034:. As Gerda Arendt noted in the AN/I thread, an edit summary that explains the reversion is a perfectly acceptable way of communicating about why the edit was reverted. Please, withdraw the ArbCom case. It will just waste time if you don't. --
1022:. You've got an active AN/I thread that started three days ago, and you're warp speeding on to ArbCom before the AN/I thread has resolved, and before any other dispute resolution methods have been tried. The ArbCom request isn't an issue of
446:
Even if you don't agree that composers should be linked, suggesting I should be banned for it because you would need to revert a few times is completely ridiculous. If you banned everyone you disagreed with there would be a ton of
2831:
Hey there, since you seem to be mainly active in classical music topics, what kinds of composers/works do you particularly enjoy? Maybe once knowing this, we can find some articles for you to work on, to help improve your chops.
2003:
I just tried to "explain" why people think of GA as of silver medal in the Olympics ;) - I agree that the wording "anybody ... can review" is misleading. - Today I have two "musicians" on the Main page, one is also the topic of
397:
Returning after a day out: I'm disappointed. What in the simple sentence "Composer is a common word" remained unclear? The word - singular or plural - doesn't need any link. Please don't create extra work for several editors.
178:
I don't think Joplin should be removed as he has popular pieces (such as the entertainer and maple leaf rag), was the most important ragtime composer, and was one of the biggest black composers which is important to many
2223:" is fine as it was, and even if I didn't agree I'd think twice about a change to a featured article (which you can tell by the little star in the upper right corner, and which was reviewed again and again). "The tenor
355:... it's counter-intuitive; the singular and plural of an article title always redirect to the same place. Also, have you previously had an account here? Your editing pattern is ... interesting; let's leave it at that.
3059:
need improvement and protection. Please do not stay away forever. Even if you do not edit, continue to follow article development. I do. I also compare the working environment here to that of other organizations I've
2241:
Sure, we can remove tenor, I suppose. I don't think we should leave it that way it is, because of wikipedia's policy "When possible, do not place links next to each other, to avoid appearing like a single link, as in
1181:
is important to me, although maybe others will help. Despite these I do think I will cut down on the amount of edits I make and try to ask others before making big decisions, hopefully that'll make people less upset.
2763:
If you forget once every 100 or so edits, do not worry. I think my rate is about 1%. 'Course your best behavior for a few months will completely turn things around. I will copy some of the Help pages, tutorials, and
132:
Thank you too, also, do you think we should raise the bar and remove more than a few composers on here? People seeing this may get overwhelmed, and it'll be difficult to add more composers with this many in already
3192:
I suppose you're right, I could stay logged on and if I occasionally see a wikipedia article that needs a slight improvement, I could add a minor change. The point is that I probably won't be very active on here
704:
Good idea, but don't call it "vote" but "discussion". The concept is "consensus", looking at arguments and not just numbers of support and oppose. If there's no clear consensus to change it remains as it is. See
1371:. This article has been around since 2005 and the legacy section is seriously missing things, so I was hoping to have the sandbox as a project for multiple people (including very experienced ones) to work on.
252:
we were to remove some names from the Overview section, leaving it for the most relevant figures. But it's fine either way, i don't have strong opinions about it. Thanks for improving these articles! Cheers â
2279:
756:, and would reach more of those if we had a broader discussion. I don't recommend a formal RfC because it would attract commenters who are unfamiliar with the subject, - but projects: why not? Your choice. --
1236:
I understand why you closed it as the topic moved to arbitration. Could you on the dispute case mention that I posted (in this thread) additional reasons as to why I filed the arbitration case? Thank you.
1782:
with an s at the end. I do see an argument to linking "composers" to composer instead of a timeline, although in most cases the reader already knows what a composer is, but not when they all lived.
791:
was applicable, because some of the criticisms were harsh, but you lost any sympathy when you started complaining about harassment, let alone when you made the equally bizarre step of jumping from
2667:
By the way, there is a way to add an edit summary after the fact. But that is not often necessary; the edit window will warn if the edit summary is missing. Best to leave that trick to later. â
2216:
I don't care much about view counts but that the right people listen to her interview and the music she wrote to "celebrate the art of women". - Sorry, I reverted your change to Britten, - "the
2094:
images would be other difficulties for me. For GA, one reviewer is responsible for the whole thing. I prefer to do peer reviews, where everybody can comment and discuss towards improvements. --
1320:
question to Beethoven's talk page to quickly contribute significantly to the article is like asking someone who has only played "Twinkle Twinkle Little Star" on the piano to master Beethoven's
1460:
2856:
Overall, Beethoven is definitely my favorite composer. My favorite classical music comes from the common practice era, although I don't mind the music before that or some other stuff too.
1957:? There has to be a detailed review, not just summarily saying all criteria are met. Careful criticism of details is what I seek in them, - not accolades ;) - Please don't do it again. --
2575:
cases beyond a simple Google search. It's common for citation needed tags to hang around for many years here; the fact that someone added one often means a source is difficult to find.
532:
It depends on what you would mean by younger. I'm not comfortable sharing my age online. However, if this applies to newer editors then the answer would be a yes, I would appreciate it.
723:
Please be precise and at least link to the two portraits in question, or - perhaps better - show a thumb in the discussion, calling them A and B, or other names, to ease discussion. --
1939:
enough to be added to Beethoven's legacy section, which I accepted. I do hope that some of the information on there will be used when other editors rewrite the legacy section though.
1422:
1063:
About the need to ask before reverting, I thought I read that somewhere, but usedtobecool explained to me that it isn't required, and since then I believe I stopped saying this.
1888:
This is a projects where the ideas of many need to be channeled to make the reading experience for the readers - for whom all this should be - a bit uniform. Do you understand?
881:
1030:. Also; on multiple occasions you've insisted that Knowledge (XXG) suggest people need to talk with you before reverting your edits. This just isn't the case. Please review
483:
3010:
2744:
1. Make an edit again to the same paragraph (just add a space to the end of the paragraph that you edited. The extra space will be stripped out by the Wikimedia software.
514:
Anyone can respond to a thread on the administrators' noticeboards, not just admins. Can I ask one more question ... all I'd need or want is a yes or no answer: would the
2051:
Perhaps it could say something like " it is not suggested to review good articles unless you have a thorough understanding of the criteria and what makes a good article"
1972:
1522:
Thank you. I do think I've learned a few things, and I try to ask for approval more often before making big changes, and explain in more detail when I do make a change.
1177:
Perhaps you're right. I may occasionally stumble across a mistake I see on an article and if it's important enough to me I'll fix it. Also, finishing Beethoven's legacy
3408:
I'm actually not that good at formatting stuff either, but I attempted to make it look better with a separate Barnstars section for you. It should look a better now.
1778:
I agree with the part where you should follow the rules even if you don't agree with them. There does seem to be some confusion between the word composer and composer
1348:, its articles ccan appear in some really surprising places so whatever you write might be the last word on a topic for many, many people ... pretty scary, I know.
966:
where you can ask questions about how to use or edit Knowledge (XXG), there are a lot of experienced editors there willing to assist you who "don't bite". Cheers!
3031:
I will probably stay for a couple of more days or so to answer any questions/concerns you guys may have or in case I see anything that needs improvement on here.
896:
891:
886:
564:
Again, I don't want to share my age (and funny thing even the article you showed me said to not share personal information), and I don't think it matters anyway.
906:
1740:
This sounds to me as if we agree that when there are guidelines it makes sense to follow even if we don't personally agree with them. There's another guideline
625:'s page it was decided that the more historically accurate image should take priority, as opposed to the more popular one. Why should it be any different here?
148:
3212:
remember correctly Aza24 already said they will improve Beethoven's legacy section, I just hope they and / or other people will use the information I wrote in
2870:
Aza24 might have other ideas or know more, but his violin sonatas could be fun to work on. You can get your hands on some things at least. Lockwood (e.g.,
1803:
1806:, which will turn 300 years tomorrow (not by calendar date but by liturgy), and I want it in better shape. (I was the one who created it, in 2011, but it
118:
As far as i know, you can't. But don't worry, it's not a big deal, your edits were ok. It would just be great if you could do that from now on. Thanks! â
911:
372:
And, yes, this is my first and only account on here. As for my editing patterns being "interesting" (whatever that means), I would like to remind you to
1455:
as premature and wanted to explain why in a bit more detail than an edit summary would allow. The English Knowledge (XXG) Arbitration Committee handles
916:
2497:
2493:
3141:
own passions, I like to celebrate birthdays, Debussy's is in three days, and I have not even looked at a piece to expand, Schoenberg's in September (
515:
468:
I'll be seeking an administrator so that they can deal with this accordingly. I don't want to fight with you, I want this to be resolved peacefully.
2981:
2760:
4. Try this out on your sandbox page before using. This will show you that adding a space at the end of a paragraph will never show up in the page.
871:
1635:
1316:, an elected committee of Knowledge (XXG) editors tasked to decide arbitration cases. To be honest, to me, asking someone who has had to post the
958:
No problem, I didn't want you to feel unwelcome here, considering some of the comments above. There's a reason we have this behavioral guideline:
3292:
I see where you're coming from, although a lack of sources would constitute for a good reason to revert an edit, so you have no problem with me.
2594:
and I'm surprised something on there would get their information from an unsourced wikipedia part. I guess not everything on there is trustable.
3035:
Thank you guys all so much for helping me and for your contributions to Knowledge (XXG). It's astounding to see the work you guys have put in.
2008:, watch and listen, - I like today's especially because you see him at work, hear him talk about his work and the result of his work - rare! --
2718:
This trick does not place the summary retroactively, but is useful for making the summary availableâonly use it where you think clarification.
1847:
with us. How many people have criticised linking "composers" to a list, - for example? And you still seemed to defend it when we talked last.
3146:
3025:
music, as well as coloring between two eras if the composer is a transitional one. You can see the templates to the other eras for examples.
1851:: you not listening to the first, and thus using up the energies of how many? Can you make some promise to next time listen to the first? --
2998:
1825:
606:
should perhaps talk about major edits before making them, or live with being reverted. Please read the edit summary, per "View history". --
2262:
2117:
1098:
doesn't have two steps, that of go to AN/I and while the discussion is going on there start a request for arbitration (RFAR). The RFAR is
2065:
One could, but in the sentence in question both the criteria and what makes a GA are linked, - isn't following the links clear enough? --
454:
page, as I'm fairly certain telling someone they should be banned over a disagreement is not okay, especially if you're making a threat.
27:
153:
In my opinion, in general it's fine as it is now, although I also agree that some could be deleted from the Overview section, such as
2403:
Earnest, Wayne N. âThe Organ Sonatas of C.P.E. Bach: A Modern View.â American Music Teacher, vol. 37, no. 4, 1988, pp. 18â19. JSTOR,
2170:
No, I haven't looked at someone else's GA review as I'm not planning on doing that again. And by the way, the work you do is amazing
901:
1451:
Hello Wikieditor662, my name is Aoidh and I am currently a member of the Arbitration Committee. I wanted to let you know that I've
858:
2731:
How to: Make a dummy edit, sometimes just de. This is only useful if you do it before anyone else makes an edit to the same page.
1475:
was still ongoing, and even with its closure there is nothing about the case request that could not be handled by other forms of
1472:
748:
regarding your question if the Strauss discussion should remain with those watching the article: I think that we should ask the
39:
1321:
1456:
1019:
413:
I don't see why it should only be about how common a word is, if it has useful information I think it should still be linked
2520:
227:
and Stravinsky. However, if you still think he isn't one maybe we should go to the main talk page and see what others think.
2347:, and the image one. The cantata is an extraordinary piece, using the chorale's text and famous melody more than others in
706:
2022:
Why doesn't anyone change the "anybody ... can review" part? Also, who's the second musician you have on the main page?
1515:
1386:
1229:
1908:
If such a section was to written, it should be more than an arbitrary list of quotes out of context. Do you understand?
2351:. It's nice to have not only a recent death, but also this "birthday" on the Main page. And a rainbow in my places. --
2282:
thinks. Following guidelines shouldn't be pedantic, and nobody would think that "tenor Peter Pears" was one term ;) --
3235:
which contains it, but I would argue that Clair de lune deserves its own article. I would also suggest expanding his
1026:. It will get rejected, even if just procedurally. There's nothing for ArbCom to do here, and your filing looks like
2431:(emphasis added, in the original, 'CPE' is not present in this snippet but is clear from context and article title)
1004:
809:
I'm not sure why this is posted on a thread about Strauss. Did you mean to post this on the "August music" thread?
2467:
Thanks, I mentioned his organ sonatas come from the galant style. If there's anything else you need, let me know.
1989:
Thanks, although I don't think looking at the things you sent me would be necessary if I won't be doing it again.
1196:
At no point was I upset. Disappointed that I couldn't explain well enough to be understood, yes, but not upset. --
2390:
2383:
2344:
2185:
2005:
1796:
We are not together there yet, but let's take a break to Monday. I am busy today with two compositions, the 2017
1418:
1317:
800:
1711:
days ago: that we don't normally link common words, such as composer, and that we have a guideline saying so? --
866:
2438:
1341:
248:
As for the others, i'm not saying that for sure we have to remove something. I was just suggesting some names
944:
Thank you! Looking at the responses from the older members there is clearly still much for me to learn here.
2958:
2528:
1761:
1568:
1512:
1464:
1452:
1226:
369:"Composers" is the multiple of a "composer", so directing multiple composers as one wouldn't make any sense.
352:
1918:
The best preparation for reviewing for Good article is to bring an article to GA status. Do you understand?
451:
3444:
3154:
2638:
2356:
2287:
2232:
2193:
2161:
2099:
2070:
2042:
2013:
1980:
1962:
1928:
1856:
1815:
1769:
1716:
1683:
1649:
1631:
1542:
1201:
761:
728:
714:
681:
644:
611:
403:
309:
3096:
2444:
I will leave using this source to youâI really do not know enough about CPE Bach to touch the article. â
2202:
Wow, and it's much more wild when you realize that the main page has been viewed almost 47 BILLION times
2139:
the style reads like literally translated from Spanish, possibly copyvio: reword in more neutral language
1824:
Alright, best of luck with those articles! Personally I've been working on Beethoven's legacy section in
1741:
1367:
with some useful information even though it's not close to being done, let alone being at the quality of
1031:
1027:
200:
I think Varese belongs in the list, just a personal opinion. I was thinking maybe removing names such as
3413:
3367:
3335:
3104:
2903:
2348:
2079:
Yes, although it would mean that a newer user who follows the criteria reads what makes a GA can review
1891:
A link should be something predictable, to send the readers to what they expect, such as "composers" to
1627:
1049:
676:. Articles reflect the preferences of the authors, - that seems to be the price for free information. --
3200:
I very much appreciate that you have grown to like me, I appreciate it a lot. May I ask what caused it?
1675:
963:
2278:
Did you read the edit summary in my revert? - Bedtime for me, and a busy day tomorrow. We'll see what
1619:
1298:
Isn't the dispute panel a thing for community decisions? Are you sure this means I won't get blocked?
319:
The word that was linked was not "composer", but "composers", which links to a timeline of composers.
3125:
3081:
3049:
2853:
Oh my god, I'm so sorry I didn't see this post (I must've mixed it up with some other notifications).
2791:
2679:
2653:
2456:
1288:
1168:
1139:
1108:
1039:
974:
931:
796:
334:
1333:
959:
65:
3261:
Hey there, and thanks for your recent interest. I just wanted to try and cordially get across that
2879:
2397:
and suggested ~ if any editor could find a supporting link then the association could be restored.
1279:
The ArbCom case isn't going to answer for you whether you're going to be blocked. The (now closed)
1081:
accusations, I don't want anyone else in a similar situation to have to go through the same thing.
205:
74:
70:
3213:
2975:(also sorry about the double spaces, otherwise the space doesn't show up on here for some reason).
2622:
is a fundamental policy of Knowledge (XXG); a personal attack is a much more egregious fault than
2614:
Your very short, mild reply to the editor Smuckola is exactly the way to handle the discussion at
1744:, in a nutshell: a link should go to something that explains what it says, in this specific case (
1313:
1120:
I'm not sure about that, since more than one member has called for me to be blocked from editing.
3454:
3426:
3377:
3349:
3293:
3278:
3242:
3041:
3022:
2987:
I certainly made some mistakes here but I hope that in the end my contributions outweighed them.
2914:
2857:
2806:
2773:
2769:
2692:
2595:
2580:
2567:
2547:
2536:
2524:
2505:
2468:
2367:
2297:
2265:
2203:
2171:
2130:
most references are in Spanish but give English titles, that's misleading: have titles in Spanish
2080:
2052:
2023:
1990:
1940:
1842:
And now it's Monday, and we have another noticeboard discussion. You obviously have no idea what
1829:
1783:
1727:
1694:
1661:
1586:
1552:
1523:
1494:
1430:
1404:
1394:
1372:
1353:
1299:
1241:
1211:
1183:
1149:
1121:
1082:
1067:
945:
810:
773:
691:
655:
626:
565:
555:
537:
523:
501:
491:
469:
455:
433:
414:
377:
360:
342:
320:
268:
267:
Happy to help, and thanks to you too for your assistance! Let me know if you need anything else.
232:
183:
134:
105:
2156:
just for starters ;) - he was a conductor in notable positions and deserves something better. --
2109:
31:
3440:
3397:
3232:
3220:
3204:
3181:
3150:
3018:
3014:
2938:
2352:
2283:
2228:
2189:
2157:
2095:
2066:
2038:
2009:
1976:
1958:
1924:
1852:
1811:
1765:
1712:
1679:
1645:
1538:
1459:
and cases are generally very involved, lengthy processes and are a "last resort" as described
1364:
1197:
1178:
757:
724:
710:
677:
640:
607:
399:
373:
305:
50:
35:
2753:
2257:), omitting one of the links (chess tournament), or using a single, more specific link as in
1468:
1280:
788:
3409:
3363:
3331:
3100:
2899:
2258:
1210:
I wasn't necessarily talking about you. There were others who were indeed very upset at me.
154:
2765:
2619:
792:
80:
3316:
3197:
3185:
3142:
3114:
3092:
3070:
2966:
2962:
2942:
2840:
2805:
planning on staying here for the length months or more, but I still like to learn though.
2780:
2747:
2. In the edit summary for the second edit, enter a clarifying message, preceded by 'de.'
2668:
2642:
2634:
2445:
2148:
a wife is only mentioned in the infobox: find a reference and mention her in Personal life
1576:
1484:
1284:
1164:
1135:
1104:
1053:
1035:
967:
924:
3390:
A sparkly barnstar! Well done Wikieditor662, thank you for all your Anti-vandalism work.
2707:
The trick will work for an edit in mainspace (or most any other space, as far as I know).
2615:
2571:
1954:
1912:
1843:
1476:
1345:
1337:
1095:
484:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Ban threats from User talk:Graham87
3236:
3069:
Knowledge (XXG). I will be very disappointed if I do not see you contributing again. â
2954:
2875:
2871:
2626:
you have done here. Just keep learning and contributing here. Keep any comments short.
2591:
1901:
The legacy of Beethoven doesn't need to be written. Most people know more or less what
1757:
833:
3268:
2950:
2576:
2532:
2501:
1953:
Thank you, and I understand now that Beethoven legacy wasn't your idea. Did you read
1493:
Thank you, I hope this is confirmation that I won't be getting blocked from editing.
1426:
1390:
1349:
876:
673:
551:
519:
487:
429:
356:
338:
3423:
3391:
3189:
3168:
3113:
I am disappointed when anyone I have grown to like participates less frequently. â
3001:. I hope you guys can use the information on there to improve his legacy section. @
2934:
1329:
255:
214:
209:
163:
158:
120:
91:
2519:
The subject line basically says it all ... nice work. You might want to check out
1915:
process is complex and needs to be understood before reviewing. Do you understand?
3262:
2224:
2220:
1798:
2433:
Many more journals and other publication may have more comprehensive coverage.
1905:
think of Beethoven, regardless of what Knowledge (XXG) says. Do you understand?
1324:
in a month ... so far beyond impossible it's not even worth considering. (The
3002:
2946:
2835:
2250:
2246:
1572:
1480:
1332:
comedy skit "The Piano Teacher" comes to mind; I'm not linking it here due to
1325:
201:
1240:
multiple times by Robert McClenon, including in the arbitration case itself.
3462:
3448:
3434:
3417:
3403:
3385:
3371:
3357:
3339:
3301:
3286:
3250:
3175:
3158:
3129:
3108:
3085:
2994:
2922:
2907:
2883:
2865:
2847:
2814:
2795:
2700:
2683:
2657:
2603:
2584:
2555:
2540:
2509:
2476:
2460:
2375:
2360:
2305:
2291:
2273:
2236:
2211:
2197:
2179:
2165:
2103:
2088:
2074:
2060:
2046:
2031:
2017:
1998:
1984:
1966:
1948:
1932:
1860:
1837:
1819:
1791:
1773:
1735:
1720:
1702:
1687:
1669:
1653:
1594:
1580:
1560:
1546:
1531:
1517:
1502:
1488:
1434:
1412:
1398:
1380:
1363:
isn't something I can do on my own without a ton of time spent. I did start
1357:
1340:
that you might know about; save the broad concept articles for later. Or do
1307:
1292:
1249:
1231:
1219:
1205:
1191:
1172:
1157:
1143:
1129:
1112:
1090:
1075:
1043:
1012:
981:
953:
938:
818:
804:
781:
765:
732:
718:
699:
685:
663:
648:
634:
615:
573:
559:
545:
527:
509:
495:
477:
463:
437:
422:
407:
385:
364:
346:
328:
313:
276:
262:
240:
221:
191:
170:
142:
127:
113:
98:
2527:
was very much unhelpful and didn't add anything to the discussion. More in
1660:
continued to edit, perhaps I didn't think it was that serious of an issue.
690:
Well, is it okay with you if I host a vote on the page of Richard Strauss?
2188:
today, like 22 July but with interview and the music to be played today --
2145:
the article had practically no links: find more such as the conservatories
1403:
On the , the date is listed as 2005. I guess I looked in the wrong place.
3376:
Thank you again, I added it :) I'm not sure if it's placed right though.
1892:
1134:
Stepping away for a few days isn't going to change that if it happens. --
3149:
but it's not yet in good shape. Help wanted, but I can't expect it ;) --
2496:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is
3224:
2404:
2142:
the whole article has little music: try to mention pieces, find reviews
1368:
669:
3013:
could be color-coded to differentiate between eras/movements such as
1389:. The fact that you got mixed up between 2001 and 2005 is concerning.
182:
As for 20th century composers, do you think Varese should be removed?
668:
Knowledge (XXG) doesn't believe in consistency. Just compare Mozart,
622:
34:. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an
3439:
Congratulations! This was also my first barnstar, 15 years ago ;) --
2990:
I have some requests, although I understand if they can't be done.
1756:, which would not help someone who doesn't know what a composer is.
995:
already at ANI with ArbCom, which is rightly a "last resort" option
208:, or other ones that almost exclusively composed film music such as
147:
I can see that some time ago someone did a cleanup, discussed here:
2984:
article (I don't know why, I guess I just really like timelines).
2254:
2243:
2217:
1103:
days. Nothing will happen that needs your attention right away. --
832:
104:
Thanks, is there a way I can add a summary after I made the edit?
3145:), Britten's in November, and that of Jesus in December. I found
351:
And It turns out that the "Composers" redirect was something you
1707:
No problem, we can learn. Do you understand now what I tried to
3028:
Again, if doing these is not possible I completely understand.
2714:
article, or anywhere else the edit summary becomes the heading.
2523:
for more guidance, if you haven't already. But your comment at
1644:
Let's try, and be patient, and not expect help from others. --
1344:; you don't have to write articles at all ... given how often
1283:
thread would have, and it closed without you being blocked. --
2712:
Of course, when you start a discussion in user talk: or talk:
2127:
check if references still work (comment out those that don't)
1365:
https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Wikieditor662/Beethoven_sandbox
1179:
https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Wikieditor662/Beethoven_sandbox
2972:(sorry if I didn't mention you, there's just so many people)
2133:
references have American date format, but should be European
837:
The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!
1117:"Nothing will happen that needs your attention right away."
500:
anks, now we just wait for the administrators to respond.h
197:
that comes to mind when you list classical music composers.
2752:
de. edit summary to my just prior edit: corrected date on
1457:
issues that cannot otherwise be resolved by the community
709:. (You don't need a formal RfC - Request for Comment.) --
2641:(I copied this from a very experienced user's page). â
2400:
Below is a supporting citation to an academic journalâ
2121:
2113:
1807:
1508:
333:
That's useless too, especially where you put it in the
62:
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make.
2136:
some references may not be reliable (then comment out)
149:
Talk:List of classical music composers by era#Overview
2116:
you see what improvements I go for. Next to improve:
1973:
Knowledge (XXG):Good article nominations/Instructions
1571:
that were omitted by mistake to my above comment. -
3227:, I would suggest creating an article for his piece
3097:
The encyclopedia has always been a volunteer service
2872:
https://archive.org/details/beethovenviolins0000unse
2633:
If you like, look toward the bottom of my user page
2389:
I noticed you recently removed text that associated
1898:
Common words don't need any link. Do you understand?
1479:, especially as most of the issues seem resolved. -
1417:
Yeah you kinda did; the only mention of 2005 on the
1760:should go to an explanation what that is, not to a
1626:
3362:You can display it on your user page if you want!
3223:If you need advice for what you can expand on for
3207:Although I didn't like everything on here, that's
3011:Template:Timeline Classical Composers 20th Century
2249:(] ]). Instead, consider rephrasing the sentence (
602:WE, I restored the lead image of Richard Strauss.
1018:I'll echo what GhostOfDanGurney said. Please see
853:Learn everything you need to know to get started.
2343:Beautiful, that looks accepted! - On 13 August,
161:or less relevant ones from the 20th century. â
89:, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! â
3263:please don't revert this without a good reason
2120:. I did some copy-editing already, before it
8:
1225:everyone would benefit from just moving on.
550:I meant age (as in if you're are under 18).
85:Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary
68:you can give yourself a reminder by setting
2494:Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard
1804:Nimm von uns, Herr, du treuer Gott, BWV 101
1148:Exactly, so there is no point in doing so.
2898:to make the colon visible. Happy editing!
2124:. Tomorrow I'll look into things such as:
1618:
1614:
2382:And now, something completely different:
3348:Thank you so much! Does it do anything?
3167:
2982:List of classical music composers by era
2498:Community ban proposal for Wikieditor662
2410:Below is a snippet of the article textâ
254:
213:
162:
119:
90:
45:The edit summary field looks like this:
2263:Knowledge (XXG):Manual of Style/Linking
2184:thank you, blushing a bit ;) - ... and
2928:
2801:Thank you. I will say I'm most likely
2751:
2418:
2108:The other article on the Main page is
1895:, not to some list. Do you understand?
1810:. - I try not to work on Sundays ;) --
3099:. Every user is free to simply stop.
2529:my comment on the admins' noticeboard
2515:Good to see you taking on copyediting
245:Ok for Joplin, seems fine to keep it.
7:
2999:User:Wikieditor662/Beethoven sandbox
2933:To some of the interested parties: @
2776:. Let me know which page you prefer.
2405:http://www.jstor.org/stable/43538723
1826:User:Wikieditor662/Beethoven sandbox
838:
621:I don't mind being reverted, but on
2993:I wrote some useful information on
2492:There is currently a discussion at
1748:we wanted to link) explaining what
3422:I Appreciate it! And same to you @
1318:"Trouble finding reliable sources"
1020:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution
14:
2521:Knowledge (XXG):Basic copyediting
1507:As I noted when making the close
3315:
2616:the Administrators' notice board
2487:
2483:Notice of noticeboard discussion
2345:Bach's cantata was 300 years old
1312:Nope, it's for decisions by the
960:please do not bite the newcomers
839:
79:
21:
3453:Nice, what did you get it for?
1453:removed the arbitration request
1056:Thank you for your suggestions.
872:Contributing to Knowledge (XXG)
867:Five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
54:(Briefly describe your changes)
2441:, you may be able to sign up.
2421:Bach uses primarily the style
1:
3463:22:21, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
3449:21:14, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
3435:20:14, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
3418:23:11, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
3404:23:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
3386:23:04, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
3372:22:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
3358:22:43, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
3340:21:22, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
3065:If nothing else, continue to
3009:It would also be nice if the
917:Biographies of living persons
707:Talk:Claude Debussy/Archive 5
3257:New message to Wikieditor662
2114:how it looked before he died
1808:looked rather poor yesterday
1006:"Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)
859:Introduction to contributing
516:guidance for younger editors
3302:03:17, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
3287:13:29, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
3251:17:50, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
3176:09:51, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
3159:07:54, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
3130:05:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
3109:05:06, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
3086:04:59, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
3050:04:23, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
2923:02:36, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
2908:02:05, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
2884:20:32, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
2866:02:34, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
2815:03:20, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
2439:The Knowledge (XXG) Library
2376:14:24, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
2361:14:06, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
2118:Miguel Ăngel GĂłmez MartĂnez
1551:You're right, I apologize.
353:just recently added changed
3491:
2929:I'm leaving wikipedia soon
2848:21:47, 9 August 2024 (UTC)
2796:07:11, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
2701:02:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
2684:01:54, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
2658:01:48, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
2604:18:07, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
2585:18:01, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
2556:03:03, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
2541:03:00, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
2510:04:26, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
2477:14:30, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
2461:06:05, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
2306:22:35, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
2292:22:27, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
2274:22:07, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
2237:21:56, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
2212:15:25, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
2198:14:54, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
2180:21:42, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
2166:20:31, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
2151:check for other obituaries
2104:18:28, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
2089:17:53, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
2075:17:41, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
2061:17:29, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
2047:17:14, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
2032:16:59, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
2018:14:48, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
1999:21:59, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
1985:20:36, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
1967:20:32, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
1949:17:42, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
1933:09:26, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
1861:06:19, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
1838:17:55, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1820:17:41, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1792:15:50, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1774:15:39, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1736:14:55, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1721:14:43, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1703:14:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1688:14:13, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1670:13:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1654:13:08, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1595:00:28, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
1581:00:01, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
1561:00:27, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
1547:23:25, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1532:18:15, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1518:18:08, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1503:14:34, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1489:03:31, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1435:15:37, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
1413:13:56, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
1399:04:29, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
1381:13:18, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1358:02:25, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1308:00:51, 4 August 2024 (UTC)
1293:23:50, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1250:21:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1232:21:36, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1220:18:55, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1206:18:50, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1192:18:33, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1173:18:15, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1158:17:25, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1144:17:16, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1130:13:05, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1113:12:19, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1091:06:49, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1076:04:56, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1044:01:24, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
1024:maybe it will get accepted
1013:01:12, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
819:20:16, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
805:20:08, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
782:22:49, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
766:20:07, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
452:Knowledge (XXG):Harassment
3314:
3279:
2913:Thank you, I fixed it :)
2384:Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach
1617:
1346:Knowledge (XXG) is copied
982:20:39, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
962:. You can also visit the
954:19:35, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
939:19:24, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
733:15:58, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
719:15:35, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
700:15:30, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
686:15:02, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
664:14:42, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
649:14:14, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
635:09:32, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
616:09:28, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
574:10:02, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
560:09:58, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
546:09:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
528:08:45, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
510:08:26, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
496:08:19, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
478:07:30, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
464:07:11, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
450:I suggest looking at the
438:10:28, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
423:05:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
408:20:26, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
386:19:13, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
365:14:19, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
347:14:16, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
329:07:33, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
314:07:31, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
299:Composer is a common word
277:12:41, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
263:12:34, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
241:11:44, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
222:07:36, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
3458:
3430:
3381:
3353:
3297:
3246:
3045:
2918:
2861:
2810:
2696:
2599:
2566:I reverted your edit at
2551:
2472:
2407:. Accessed 4 Aug. 2024.
2371:
2301:
2280:the FA writer of Britten
2269:
2207:
2175:
2084:
2056:
2027:
1994:
1971:ps: next step to study:
1944:
1833:
1787:
1731:
1698:
1665:
1590:
1556:
1527:
1498:
1408:
1376:
1303:
1245:
1215:
1187:
1153:
1125:
1086:
1071:
949:
814:
777:
695:
659:
630:
569:
541:
505:
486:. I've responded there.
473:
459:
418:
381:
324:
272:
236:
192:22:58, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
187:
171:21:26, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
143:20:30, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
138:
128:20:00, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
114:15:37, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
109:
99:07:09, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
2959:User:Just Step Sideways
2562:Knowledge (XXG) mirrors
2037:"instruction creep"? --
1762:List of string quartets
1032:this essay on reverting
897:Policies and guidelines
66:Knowledge (XXG) account
3323:The Resilient Barnstar
2639:User:Neonorange/How to
2590:Oh I see. I looked at
2417:"In his organ sonatas
990:Re: Your ArbCom filing
923:Happy editing! Cheers,
845:
789:Don't bite the newbies
752:more than the article
3231:; there's an article
3095:Why be disappointed?
3055:Knowledge (XXG) will
1465:2 August case request
1314:Arbitration Committee
836:
26:Hello. Thank you for
3233:for the entire suite
2572:the source you cited
1322:Hammerklavier Sonata
3308:A barnstar for you!
2620:No personal attacks
1569:added missing words
1419:article's talk page
206:Harrison Birtwistle
2756:to follow citation
2568:Witold Lutoslawski
2525:Talk:Alfred Lennon
2186:a third "musician"
1764:. Can we agree? --
1754:a timeline of them
1513:Just Step Sideways
1477:dispute resolution
1421:is a reference to
1334:copyright concerns
1227:Just Step Sideways
1096:Dispute resolution
846:
28:your contributions
3345:
3344:
3214:Beethoven sandbox
2427:Empfindsamer Stil
2112:. If you compare
1849:That is a problem
1641:
1640:
1585:I appreciate it.
1473:opened on 30 July
1385:It's been around
829:A Belated Welcome
374:assume good faith
335:François Couperin
175:Removed de Milan.
55:
3482:
3400:
3394:
3319:
3312:
3311:
3285:
3283:
3277:
3273:
3264:
3174:
3171:
3147:a piece for that
3119:
3075:
2997:'s influence in
2845:
2843:
2838:
2785:
2673:
2647:
2491:
2490:
2450:
2432:
2259:chess tournament
2122:looked like this
1884:Let's continue.
1622:
1615:
1467:was opened, the
1338:reliable sources
1050:GhostOfDanGurney
1011:
1007:
877:Picture tutorial
854:
844:
843:
842:
261:
258:
220:
217:
169:
166:
126:
123:
97:
94:
88:
87:
86:
83:
56:
53:
25:
24:
3490:
3489:
3485:
3484:
3483:
3481:
3480:
3479:
3398:
3392:
3310:
3275:
3269:
3267:
3259:
3172:
3143:Pierrot lunaire
3115:
3071:
2931:
2894:
2892:Missing colon :
2841:
2836:
2834:
2829:
2827:Favorite music?
2781:
2766:tips of the day
2669:
2643:
2635:user:Neonorange
2612:
2564:
2517:
2488:
2485:
2446:
2430:
2387:
2110:AntĂŽnio Meneses
1613:
1423:its peer review
1005:
1001:
992:
921:
912:Manual of Style
862:
855:
852:
840:
831:
797:Robert McClenon
600:
301:
259:
218:
167:
124:
95:
84:
78:
69:
59:
49:
32:Knowledge (XXG)
22:
19:
12:
11:
5:
3488:
3486:
3478:
3477:
3476:
3475:
3474:
3473:
3472:
3471:
3470:
3469:
3468:
3467:
3466:
3465:
3406:
3343:
3342:
3326:
3325:
3320:
3309:
3306:
3305:
3304:
3258:
3255:
3254:
3253:
3240:
3237:Two Arabesques
3217:
3201:
3194:
3178:
3162:
3161:
3137:
3136:
3135:
3134:
3133:
3132:
3063:
3061:
3034:
2930:
2927:
2926:
2925:
2893:
2890:
2889:
2888:
2887:
2886:
2854:
2828:
2825:
2824:
2823:
2822:
2821:
2820:
2819:
2818:
2817:
2777:
2761:
2758:
2748:
2745:
2737:
2736:
2735:
2734:
2733:
2732:
2724:
2723:
2722:
2721:
2720:
2719:
2716:
2709:
2708:
2665:
2664:
2631:
2630:
2611:
2608:
2607:
2606:
2592:Google Scholar
2563:
2560:
2559:
2558:
2546:Thank you. :)
2516:
2513:
2484:
2481:
2480:
2479:
2415:
2414:
2386:
2380:
2379:
2378:
2341:
2340:
2339:
2338:
2337:
2336:
2335:
2334:
2333:
2332:
2331:
2330:
2329:
2328:
2327:
2326:
2325:
2324:
2323:
2322:
2321:
2320:
2319:
2318:
2317:
2316:
2315:
2314:
2313:
2312:
2311:
2310:
2309:
2308:
2154:
2153:
2152:
2149:
2146:
2143:
2140:
2137:
2134:
2131:
2128:
2106:
1969:
1920:
1919:
1916:
1909:
1906:
1899:
1896:
1889:
1882:
1881:
1880:
1879:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1758:String quartet
1639:
1638:
1624:
1623:
1612:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1252:
1237:
1118:
1066:Thanks again.
1064:
1061:
1057:
1028:forum shopping
991:
988:
987:
986:
985:
984:
920:
919:
914:
909:
904:
899:
894:
889:
884:
879:
874:
869:
863:
856:
851:
830:
827:
826:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
721:
599:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
533:
518:apply to you?
448:
444:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
370:
300:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
292:
291:
290:
289:
288:
287:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
280:
279:
246:
228:
198:
180:
176:
151:
57:
47:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
3487:
3464:
3460:
3456:
3455:Wikieditor662
3452:
3451:
3450:
3446:
3442:
3438:
3437:
3436:
3432:
3428:
3427:Wikieditor662
3425:
3421:
3420:
3419:
3415:
3411:
3407:
3405:
3401:
3395:
3389:
3388:
3387:
3383:
3379:
3378:Wikieditor662
3375:
3374:
3373:
3369:
3365:
3361:
3360:
3359:
3355:
3351:
3350:Wikieditor662
3347:
3346:
3341:
3337:
3333:
3328:
3327:
3324:
3321:
3318:
3313:
3307:
3303:
3299:
3295:
3294:Wikieditor662
3291:
3290:
3289:
3288:
3284:
3282:
3274:
3272:
3256:
3252:
3248:
3244:
3243:Wikieditor662
3241:
3238:
3234:
3230:
3229:Clair de lune
3226:
3222:
3218:
3215:
3210:
3206:
3202:
3199:
3195:
3191:
3187:
3183:
3179:
3177:
3170:
3164:
3163:
3160:
3156:
3152:
3148:
3144:
3139:
3138:
3131:
3128:) (he, they)
3127:
3123:
3122:
3118:
3112:
3111:
3110:
3106:
3102:
3098:
3094:
3090:
3089:
3087:
3084:) (he, they)
3083:
3079:
3078:
3074:
3068:
3064:
3062:
3058:
3054:
3053:
3052:
3051:
3047:
3043:
3042:Wikieditor662
3039:
3036:
3032:
3029:
3026:
3024:
3020:
3016:
3012:
3007:
3004:
3000:
2996:
2991:
2988:
2985:
2983:
2977:
2976:
2973:
2969:
2968:
2964:
2960:
2956:
2952:
2948:
2944:
2940:
2936:
2924:
2920:
2916:
2915:Wikieditor662
2912:
2911:
2910:
2909:
2905:
2901:
2891:
2885:
2881:
2877:
2873:
2869:
2868:
2867:
2863:
2859:
2858:Wikieditor662
2855:
2852:
2851:
2850:
2849:
2846:
2844:
2839:
2826:
2816:
2812:
2808:
2807:Wikieditor662
2804:
2800:
2799:
2797:
2794:) (he, they)
2793:
2789:
2788:
2784:
2778:
2775:
2774:Wikieditor662
2771:
2767:
2762:
2759:
2757:
2755:
2750:3. Example:
2749:
2746:
2743:
2742:
2741:
2740:
2739:
2738:
2730:
2729:
2728:
2727:
2726:
2725:
2717:
2715:
2711:
2710:
2706:
2705:
2704:
2703:
2702:
2698:
2694:
2693:Wikieditor662
2689:
2688:
2687:
2685:
2682:) (he, they)
2681:
2677:
2676:
2672:
2663:
2662:
2661:
2659:
2656:) (he, they)
2655:
2651:
2650:
2646:
2640:
2636:
2629:
2628:
2627:
2625:
2621:
2617:
2609:
2605:
2601:
2597:
2596:Wikieditor662
2593:
2589:
2588:
2587:
2586:
2582:
2578:
2573:
2569:
2561:
2557:
2553:
2549:
2548:Wikieditor662
2545:
2544:
2543:
2542:
2538:
2534:
2530:
2526:
2522:
2514:
2512:
2511:
2507:
2503:
2500:. Thank you.
2499:
2495:
2482:
2478:
2474:
2470:
2469:Wikieditor662
2466:
2465:
2464:
2462:
2459:) (he, they)
2458:
2454:
2453:
2449:
2442:
2440:
2434:
2428:
2424:
2420:
2413:
2412:
2411:
2408:
2406:
2401:
2398:
2396:
2392:
2385:
2381:
2377:
2373:
2369:
2368:Wikieditor662
2366:Congrats! đ
2365:
2364:
2363:
2362:
2358:
2354:
2350:
2346:
2307:
2303:
2299:
2298:Wikieditor662
2295:
2294:
2293:
2289:
2285:
2281:
2277:
2276:
2275:
2271:
2267:
2266:Wikieditor662
2264:
2260:
2256:
2252:
2248:
2245:
2240:
2239:
2238:
2234:
2230:
2226:
2222:
2219:
2215:
2214:
2213:
2209:
2205:
2204:Wikieditor662
2201:
2200:
2199:
2195:
2191:
2187:
2183:
2182:
2181:
2177:
2173:
2172:Wikieditor662
2169:
2168:
2167:
2163:
2159:
2155:
2150:
2147:
2144:
2141:
2138:
2135:
2132:
2129:
2126:
2125:
2123:
2119:
2115:
2111:
2107:
2105:
2101:
2097:
2092:
2091:
2090:
2086:
2082:
2081:Wikieditor662
2078:
2077:
2076:
2072:
2068:
2064:
2063:
2062:
2058:
2054:
2053:Wikieditor662
2050:
2049:
2048:
2044:
2040:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2029:
2025:
2024:Wikieditor662
2021:
2020:
2019:
2015:
2011:
2007:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1996:
1992:
1991:Wikieditor662
1988:
1987:
1986:
1982:
1978:
1974:
1970:
1968:
1964:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1946:
1942:
1941:Wikieditor662
1937:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1917:
1914:
1910:
1907:
1904:
1900:
1897:
1894:
1890:
1887:
1886:
1885:
1862:
1858:
1854:
1850:
1845:
1841:
1840:
1839:
1835:
1831:
1830:Wikieditor662
1827:
1823:
1822:
1821:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1802:and the 1724
1801:
1800:
1795:
1794:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1784:Wikieditor662
1781:
1777:
1776:
1775:
1771:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1733:
1729:
1728:Wikieditor662
1724:
1723:
1722:
1718:
1714:
1710:
1706:
1705:
1704:
1700:
1696:
1695:Wikieditor662
1691:
1690:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1677:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1667:
1663:
1662:Wikieditor662
1658:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1651:
1647:
1637:
1633:
1629:
1625:
1621:
1616:
1610:
1596:
1592:
1588:
1587:Wikieditor662
1584:
1583:
1582:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1566:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1553:Wikieditor662
1550:
1549:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1535:
1534:
1533:
1529:
1525:
1524:Wikieditor662
1521:
1520:
1519:
1516:
1514:
1509:
1506:
1505:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1495:Wikieditor662
1492:
1491:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1474:
1470:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1450:
1449:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1420:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1405:Wikieditor662
1402:
1401:
1400:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1373:Wikieditor662
1370:
1366:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1315:
1311:
1310:
1309:
1305:
1301:
1300:Wikieditor662
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1282:
1251:
1247:
1243:
1242:Wikieditor662
1238:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1230:
1228:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1217:
1213:
1212:Wikieditor662
1209:
1208:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1184:Wikieditor662
1180:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1150:Wikieditor662
1147:
1146:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1122:Wikieditor662
1119:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1101:
1097:
1094:
1093:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1083:Wikieditor662
1079:
1078:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1068:Wikieditor662
1065:
1062:
1058:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1041:
1037:
1033:
1029:
1025:
1021:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1010:
1009:
1008:
998:
989:
983:
980:
979:
978:
973:
972:
971:
965:
961:
957:
956:
955:
951:
947:
946:Wikieditor662
943:
942:
941:
940:
937:
936:
935:
930:
929:
928:
918:
915:
913:
910:
908:
905:
903:
900:
898:
895:
893:
890:
888:
885:
883:
880:
878:
875:
873:
870:
868:
865:
864:
861:
860:
850:
835:
828:
820:
816:
812:
811:Wikieditor662
808:
807:
806:
802:
798:
794:
790:
785:
784:
783:
779:
775:
774:Wikieditor662
770:
769:
768:
767:
763:
759:
755:
751:
734:
730:
726:
722:
720:
716:
712:
708:
703:
702:
701:
697:
693:
692:Wikieditor662
689:
688:
687:
683:
679:
675:
674:Wolfgang Rihm
671:
667:
666:
665:
661:
657:
656:Wikieditor662
652:
651:
650:
646:
642:
638:
637:
636:
632:
628:
627:Wikieditor662
624:
620:
619:
618:
617:
613:
609:
605:
597:
575:
571:
567:
566:Wikieditor662
563:
562:
561:
557:
553:
549:
548:
547:
543:
539:
538:Wikieditor662
534:
531:
530:
529:
525:
521:
517:
513:
512:
511:
507:
503:
502:Wikieditor662
499:
498:
497:
493:
489:
485:
481:
480:
479:
475:
471:
470:Wikieditor662
467:
466:
465:
461:
457:
456:Wikieditor662
453:
449:
445:
441:
440:
439:
435:
431:
426:
425:
424:
420:
416:
415:Wikieditor662
412:
411:
410:
409:
405:
401:
387:
383:
379:
378:Wikieditor662
375:
371:
368:
367:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
349:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
331:
330:
326:
322:
321:Wikieditor662
318:
317:
316:
315:
311:
307:
298:
278:
274:
270:
269:Wikieditor662
266:
265:
264:
257:
251:
247:
244:
243:
242:
238:
234:
233:Wikieditor662
229:
225:
224:
223:
216:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
194:
193:
189:
185:
184:Wikieditor662
181:
177:
174:
173:
172:
165:
160:
156:
155:Luis de MilĂĄn
152:
150:
146:
145:
144:
140:
136:
135:Wikieditor662
131:
130:
129:
122:
117:
116:
115:
111:
107:
106:Wikieditor662
103:
102:
101:
100:
93:
82:
76:
72:
67:
63:
58:
52:
46:
43:
41:
37:
33:
29:
16:
3441:Gerda Arendt
3322:
3280:
3270:
3260:
3228:
3221:Gerda Arendt
3208:
3205:Gerda Arendt
3182:Gerda Arendt
3151:Gerda Arendt
3126:talk to Phil
3120:
3116:
3082:talk to Phil
3076:
3072:
3066:
3056:
3040:
3037:
3033:
3030:
3027:
3008:
2992:
2989:
2986:
2978:
2974:
2971:
2970:
2939:Gerda Arendt
2932:
2895:
2833:
2830:
2802:
2792:talk to Phil
2786:
2782:
2713:
2680:talk to Phil
2674:
2670:
2666:
2654:talk to Phil
2648:
2644:
2632:
2623:
2613:
2565:
2518:
2486:
2457:talk to Phil
2451:
2447:
2443:
2435:
2426:
2422:
2416:
2409:
2402:
2399:
2394:
2388:
2353:Gerda Arendt
2342:
2284:Gerda Arendt
2229:Gerda Arendt
2190:Gerda Arendt
2158:Gerda Arendt
2096:Gerda Arendt
2067:Gerda Arendt
2039:Gerda Arendt
2010:Gerda Arendt
1977:Gerda Arendt
1959:Gerda Arendt
1925:Gerda Arendt
1921:
1902:
1883:
1853:Gerda Arendt
1848:
1812:Gerda Arendt
1797:
1779:
1766:Gerda Arendt
1753:
1749:
1745:
1742:WP:EASTEREGG
1713:Gerda Arendt
1708:
1680:Gerda Arendt
1646:Gerda Arendt
1642:
1611:August music
1539:Softlavender
1330:Dudley Moore
1278:
1198:Gerda Arendt
1100:dramatically
1099:
1023:
1003:
1002:
996:
993:
976:
975:
969:
968:
933:
932:
926:
925:
922:
857:
847:
795:to ArbCom.
758:Gerda Arendt
753:
749:
747:
725:Gerda Arendt
711:Gerda Arendt
678:Gerda Arendt
641:Gerda Arendt
608:Gerda Arendt
603:
601:
400:Gerda Arendt
396:
306:Gerda Arendt
302:
249:
210:Howard Shore
159:Scott Joplin
61:
60:
51:Edit summary
48:
44:
36:edit summary
20:
3410:TheWikiToby
3364:TheWikiToby
3332:TheWikiToby
3101:TheWikiToby
3038:Sincerely,
3019:avant-garde
2900:TheWikiToby
2261:." It's in
2225:Peter Pears
2221:Peter Pears
1799:Reminiszenz
1693:confusion.
1676:WP:OVERLINK
1471:discussion
1463:. When the
1342:maintenance
882:Referencing
71:Preferences
40:quite brief
3198:Neonorange
3186:Neonorange
3093:Neonorange
3023:Minimalist
2967:Nikkimaria
2963:Isaidnoway
2943:Neonorange
2251:tournament
2247:tournament
1750:a composer
1387:since 2001
1326:Peter Cook
1285:Hammersoft
1165:Hammersoft
1136:Hammersoft
1105:Hammersoft
1054:Hammersoft
1036:Hammersoft
970:Isaidnoway
927:Isaidnoway
907:Navigating
902:Talk pages
202:Alex North
3121:eonorange
3077:eonorange
3015:Modernist
2995:Beethoven
2955:MONTENSEM
2876:MONTENSEM
2787:eonorange
2675:eonorange
2649:eonorange
2452:eonorange
2349:the cycle
964:help desk
443:articles.
337:article.
17:July 2024
3271:Remsense
3193:anymore.
2951:Graham87
2768:to your
2624:anything
2577:Graham87
2570:because
2533:Graham87
2502:Graham87
2391:CPE Bach
2296:Alright
2006:my story
1893:composer
1752:is, not
1427:Graham87
1391:Graham87
1350:Graham87
552:Graham87
520:Graham87
488:Graham87
430:Graham87
357:Graham87
339:Graham87
3424:Knitsey
3393:Knitsey
3225:Debussy
3190:Gor1995
3169:Gor1995
2935:Gor1995
2770:sandbox
2754:Opus 51
1709:explain
1469:WP:AN/I
1369:Josquin
1281:WP:AN/I
997:because
754:authors
750:readers
670:Debussy
598:Strauss
256:Gor1995
215:Gor1995
179:people.
164:Gor1995
121:Gor1995
92:Gor1995
75:Editing
64:With a
3219:P.S. @
3060:known.
3057:always
3021:, and
2842:(talk)
2610:Thanks
2423:galant
2395:galant
1636:places
977:(talk)
934:(talk)
892:Tables
887:Images
793:WP:ANI
623:Mozart
482:Link:
3003:Aza24
2947:Aza24
2837:Aza24
2393:with
2255:chess
2244:chess
2218:tenor
1955:WP:GA
1913:WP:GA
1844:WP:GA
1632:music
1628:story
1573:Aoidh
1567:I've
1481:Aoidh
447:bans.
3459:talk
3445:talk
3431:talk
3414:talk
3399:talk
3382:talk
3368:talk
3354:talk
3336:talk
3298:talk
3247:talk
3155:talk
3105:talk
3046:talk
2919:talk
2904:talk
2880:talk
2862:talk
2811:talk
2697:talk
2600:talk
2581:talk
2552:talk
2537:talk
2506:talk
2473:talk
2437:for
2425:and
2372:talk
2357:talk
2302:talk
2288:talk
2270:talk
2233:talk
2208:talk
2194:talk
2176:talk
2162:talk
2100:talk
2085:talk
2071:talk
2057:talk
2043:talk
2028:talk
2014:talk
1995:talk
1981:talk
1975:. --
1963:talk
1945:talk
1929:talk
1911:The
1903:they
1857:talk
1834:talk
1816:talk
1788:talk
1770:talk
1732:talk
1717:talk
1699:talk
1684:talk
1666:talk
1650:talk
1591:talk
1577:talk
1557:talk
1543:talk
1528:talk
1499:talk
1485:talk
1461:here
1431:talk
1409:talk
1395:talk
1377:talk
1354:talk
1328:and
1304:talk
1289:talk
1246:talk
1216:talk
1202:talk
1188:talk
1169:talk
1154:talk
1140:talk
1126:talk
1109:talk
1087:talk
1072:talk
1040:talk
950:talk
815:talk
801:talk
778:talk
762:talk
729:talk
715:talk
696:talk
682:talk
672:and
660:talk
645:talk
631:talk
612:talk
570:talk
556:talk
542:talk
524:talk
506:talk
492:talk
474:talk
460:talk
434:talk
419:talk
404:talk
382:talk
361:talk
343:talk
325:talk
310:talk
273:talk
237:talk
212:. â
188:talk
139:talk
110:talk
3209:not
3067:use
2897:-->
2803:not
2772:or
2419:CPE
2253:of
604:You
30:to
3461:)
3447:)
3433:)
3416:)
3402:)
3384:)
3370:)
3356:)
3338:)
3300:)
3276:â„
3249:)
3173:đ
3157:)
3107:)
3088:â
3048:)
3017:,
2921:)
2906:)
2882:)
2864:)
2813:)
2798:â
2779:â
2699:)
2686:â
2660:â
2618:.
2602:)
2583:)
2554:)
2539:)
2531:.
2508:)
2475:)
2463:â
2429:"
2374:)
2359:)
2304:)
2290:)
2272:)
2235:)
2210:)
2196:)
2178:)
2164:)
2102:)
2087:)
2073:)
2059:)
2045:)
2030:)
2016:)
1997:)
1983:)
1965:)
1947:)
1931:)
1923:--
1859:)
1836:)
1828:.
1818:)
1790:)
1772:)
1746:if
1734:)
1719:)
1701:)
1686:)
1668:)
1652:)
1634:·
1630:·
1593:)
1579:)
1559:)
1545:)
1530:)
1501:)
1487:)
1433:)
1425:.
1411:)
1397:)
1379:)
1356:)
1306:)
1291:)
1248:)
1218:)
1204:)
1190:)
1171:)
1163:--
1156:)
1142:)
1128:)
1111:)
1089:)
1074:)
1042:)
952:)
817:)
803:)
780:)
764:)
731:)
717:)
698:)
684:)
662:)
647:)
633:)
614:)
572:)
558:)
544:)
526:)
508:)
494:)
476:)
462:)
436:)
421:)
406:)
398:--
384:)
376:.
363:)
345:)
327:)
312:)
275:)
260:đ
250:if
239:)
219:đ
204:,
190:)
168:đ
157:,
141:)
125:đ
112:)
96:đ
77:â
73:â
42:.
3457:(
3443:(
3429:(
3412:(
3396:(
3380:(
3366:(
3352:(
3334:(
3296:(
3281:èźș
3245:(
3239:.
3216:.
3203:@
3196:@
3188:@
3184:@
3180:@
3153:(
3124:(
3117:N
3103:(
3091:@
3080:(
3073:N
3044:(
2965:@
2961:@
2957:@
2953:@
2949:@
2945:@
2941:@
2937:@
2917:(
2902:(
2878:(
2860:(
2809:(
2790:(
2783:N
2695:(
2678:(
2671:N
2652:(
2645:N
2598:(
2579:(
2550:(
2535:(
2504:(
2471:(
2455:(
2448:N
2370:(
2355:(
2300:(
2286:(
2268:(
2231:(
2206:(
2192:(
2174:(
2160:(
2098:(
2083:(
2069:(
2055:(
2041:(
2026:(
2012:(
1993:(
1979:(
1961:(
1943:(
1927:(
1855:(
1832:(
1814:(
1786:(
1780:s
1768:(
1730:(
1715:(
1697:(
1682:(
1664:(
1648:(
1589:(
1575:(
1555:(
1541:(
1526:(
1497:(
1483:(
1429:(
1407:(
1393:(
1375:(
1352:(
1302:(
1287:(
1244:(
1214:(
1200:(
1186:(
1167:(
1152:(
1138:(
1124:(
1107:(
1085:(
1070:(
1052:@
1048:@
1038:(
1000:â
948:(
813:(
799:(
776:(
760:(
727:(
713:(
694:(
680:(
658:(
643:(
629:(
610:(
568:(
554:(
540:(
522:(
504:(
490:(
472:(
458:(
432:(
417:(
402:(
380:(
359:(
341:(
323:(
308:(
271:(
235:(
186:(
137:(
108:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
