57:
novel, and from there the movies can be referenced. Any and all content regarding these 2 characters can be merged with the novel article since there is a section for characters. Also, please respond or comment on the actual deletion discussion pages where it is appropriate in order to reveal this to everyone in order to discuss it, that's why they have the discussion boards.
133:
91:. I fail to see what value these character articles add over and above the article for the novels and books. Also, a movie review or a book review does not make the character notable, it might make the book or movie notable, but not the character and the same for the sources which analyze the book and story within the book, it makes the book notable, not the characters.
56:
Yes, the main article would be the Novel which is the original work which references these characters. I consider the novel and the 2 movies all the same since they are all the same story, with slight variations for time and content of the movies. I would redirect to the original work which is the
105:
Articles on the separate characters are good for us, because they allow for the realistic potential of including information on how the presentation of the characters change from medium to medium. Deleting the articles would be detrimental to our project because we have valuable mergeable and
31:
You say to merge to "main article." What "main article"? The character appears in two films and a novel. Saying it's "non-notable" is odd given that a Google Book search shows dozens of hits in secondary sources analyzing the novel and the characters while Google News shows dozens of hits
162:
168:
32:
reviewing the film and its characters. There's enough from interviews where development sections are realistic, as are reception sections, and comparisons from novel versus film. Please reconsider. Again there's
106:
improveable content and as such would diminish our coverage of a notable topic and mybe even turn away the good faith volunteers who actually do write these and other articles. Anyway, I have begun revising both:
82:
Also, saying the character appears in 1 book and 2 movies is misleading, it's still only one story and to state what you stated the way you stated is putting these characters on the same level of a character like
175:
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
25:
21:
44:. The character article is relevant to all three of these. Not any one is the clear redirect location. In fact the character article serves as a gateway to these different adaptations. Sincerely, --
71:
It doesn't hurt anything by keeping them and again, they concern characters from not just the novel but also TWO films and thus are not simply relevant to the novel articles. Sincerely, --
137:
87:
who was the subject of 8 books and a tv series. The book is the main point of order for this story, and I would classify the movies as articles based on the
167:
161:
41:
37:
33:
16:
I am the WildWikiGuy, I seek to make the truth known and opinions don't matter, fact and truth are all that matter.
145:
144:
and
Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to
141:
88:
184:
92:
58:
159:
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
113:
84:
72:
45:
180:
188:
116:
100:
75:
66:
48:
132:
153:
110:
107:
8:
148:. There are two ways to do this. Either:
156:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
7:
14:
171:) located above the edit window.
166:
160:
131:
42:Bridge to Terabithia (2007 film)
38:Bridge_to_Terabithia_(1985_film)
1:
117:02:13, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
101:02:24, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
76:02:13, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
67:02:13, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
49:01:04, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
34:Bridge to Terabithia (novel)
204:
189:00:01, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
140:. When you add content to
138:welcome to Knowledge (XXG)
96:
62:
89:Knowledge (XXG):SPINOUT
127:Your recent edits
195:
170:
164:
135:
203:
202:
198:
197:
196:
194:
193:
192:
146:sign your posts
129:
29:
12:
11:
5:
201:
199:
173:
172:
157:
128:
125:
124:
123:
122:
121:
120:
119:
85:Ramona Quimby
80:
79:
78:
28:
18:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
200:
191:
190:
186:
182:
179:Thank you. --
177:
169:
163:
158:
155:
151:
150:
149:
147:
143:
139:
134:
126:
118:
115:
111:
108:
104:
103:
102:
98:
94:
90:
86:
81:
77:
74:
70:
69:
68:
64:
60:
55:
54:
53:
52:
51:
50:
47:
43:
39:
35:
27:
23:
19:
17:
178:
174:
130:
30:
15:
112:. Best, --
93:WildWikiGuy
59:WildWikiGuy
142:talk pages
136:Hello and
20:Regarding
152:Add four
114:A Nobody
73:A Nobody
46:A Nobody
181:SineBot
154:tildes
40:, and
185:talk
109:and
97:talk
63:talk
26:this
24:and
22:this
165:or
187:)
99:)
65:)
36:,
183:(
95:(
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
