108:
168:
article, that's where the issue belongs. I'm concerned that when it is done that the style of the combined articles appears "seamless.' As I'm traveling for the next two months, I'm not able to spend much time on this, so if merging is decided upon, and if anyone feels up to doing that, please do go
186:
Are you back yet? I hope we can find a source that says the chakras represent levels after a certain amount of bones, etc.. Until then or whenever you might want to merge them, you could put the article in your userspace in a place like
122:
31:
article), if anybody considers that some of it can be part of this larger article please fee free to add it as new section. But,please do not delete parts of the the original article yet.
66:
Sorry for not getting back to you on that article, but someone told me 'This article was originally written by Wim
Borsboom and has been accepted by
71:
188:
169:
ahead. No matter what, when I return I will spend much time on "inline citations." I'm collectiong the needed bibliography for it.
78:.' I'd be interested to hear any further developments like a possible return to Knowledge or new details. I made some notes in my
82:(link at bottom of my user page) (you could use your sandbox to draft article; a user page is intended as more about the user.)--
91:
145:
As you pointed the link, I saw the discussion but still I see no sense in having a separate article even if it is not OR. --
118:
114:
24:
17:
75:
46:
What are trying to write in the article is not clear? What is the subject? Please add inline references see
133:
170:
121:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at
32:
196:
87:
79:
146:
55:
129:
192:
83:
47:
107:
200:
178:
151:
137:
95:
60:
40:
74:. It has been on his blog 'The Kundalini Process' at least since 2009:
165:
51:
28:
128:
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.
50:
for reference styles on wikipedia. There is already an article on
123:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Chakras - Number of Petals
113:An article that you have been involved in editing,
191:so you can use your user page for other stuff.--
189:User:William Vroman/Chakras - number of petals
8:
102:AfD nomination of Chakras - Number of Petals
164:I'm not at all against merging with the
27:section link from Knowledge here (The
7:
14:
106:
201:03:24, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
1:
68:Chinese Buddhist Encyclopedia
72:The Chakras And Their Petals
219:
179:19:21, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
152:13:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
138:18:14, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
115:Chakras - Number of Petals
61:18:00, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
41:18:04, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
25:Chakras - Number of Petals
18:Chakras - Number of Petals
96:12:30, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
174:
36:
76:Updated View of Chakras
117:, has been listed for
23:I have added this
210:
149:
110:
58:
218:
217:
213:
212:
211:
209:
208:
207:
162:
147:
111:
104:
56:
21:
12:
11:
5:
216:
214:
206:
205:
204:
203:
161:
158:
157:
156:
155:
154:
105:
103:
100:
99:
98:
45:
33:William Vroman
20:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
215:
202:
198:
194:
190:
185:
184:
183:
182:
181:
180:
176:
172:
167:
159:
153:
150:
144:
143:
142:
141:
140:
139:
135:
131:
126:
125:. Thank you.
124:
120:
116:
109:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
65:
64:
63:
62:
59:
53:
49:
43:
42:
38:
34:
30:
26:
19:
16:
163:
127:
112:
67:
44:
22:
148:Redtigerxyz
57:Redtigerxyz
130:TheRingess
193:Dchmelik
119:deletion
84:dchmelik
160:Merging
80:sandbox
52:Chakras
166:Chakra
48:WP:REF
29:Chakra
197:talk
175:talk
134:talk
37:talk
54:.--
199:)
177:)
171:wv
136:)
94:)
70::
39:)
195:(
173:(
132:(
92:c
90:|
88:t
86:(
35:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
