Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Writ Keeper/Archives/10

Source 📝

4414:. If the thread was about NE Ent, then that last addition would've been relevant, but it's not, so it wasn't. I know that "comment on content, not contributor" is a tired cliche, but it does have some value on occasion, and I think this is one of those occasions. Pointing out that NE Ent doesn't make many mainspace contributions doesn't make his argument in this case any more or less valid, so when brought up in a rebuttal, it just looks like a petty attempt to belittle your opponents. It's just unnecessary; I can accept that you feel that it's actually relevant, but a) I'm not sure how many people would agree with you, and b) in any event, it looks like a simple attempt to belittle your opponent rather than address their position, which is all-too-common a tactic on Knowledge (XXG) and the Internet in general. Even if that wasn't your intent, we still have to be sensitive at least to some degree towards the appearance of our actions to others. And I'll add that I didn't have a huge problem with your post at first (the "at least do it competently" was unnecessary, but whatever, there's been worse); it was the second part about their contribs you added later that was the problem. By all means, call out misquoted/misleading/bad links or poor behavior, and do it with rhetorical flair if you like. It's just that going on to belittle another user and his general contributions is not also fair game. 4382:
board. I'm staggered that there's so much empathy for an editor who made so many personal attacks on me. I could be accused of lively and argumentative discourse, but I never resorted to anything like "freakish obsessive", "Crazy", "troll with no life", "basement-dwelling Brit-twit", "obsessive eccentric". If we now intend to allow editors to go full tilt and insult people like that, just because they don't like the way a discussion is going against them, we might as well turn the lights off right now. Good luck. (By the way, I truly believe that the readers at AN/I etc need to be informed as to the active positive contributions that all the lurkers have made, if someone is prepared to claim they need to be judged on the quality of their contributions but don't actually improve the content of the encyclopaedia, it should be noted. This isn't Facebook or Twitter, we shouldn't be here exclusively to talk about things). Finally, please note that the user being so ardently defended has used his talk page to attack me once again, calling me an
463:"Admin" sounds so...sexy, like you're doing important stuff! "Bureaucrat" sounds like you're filing A23 forms into cabinet B6 and bingo, you sunk my battleship! I'm pretty sure any kid that tells their mother, "Mommy, I want to be a bureacrat when I grow up," is legally obligated to be left for the wolves.) The renaming thing is a thing I could and would do; ever since I helped Hafspajen with his username thing I'd been thinking about that, but it's like one of three jobs that the 'crats do, and not the biggest one at that, and the other jobs hold no real appeal to me. (Plus, they've said that they're eventually going to take away renaming at a local level, which sounds like a fantastically bad idea, but that's another story altogether.) But, they said they needed help, so I thought, "eh, what the hell", decided to give it a shot, and here we are. 4496:"Our servers are currently experiencing a technical problem. This is probably temporary and should be fixed soon." things (I got two or three more trying to get back here), and in the meantime, I see that JohnReaves has already posted there. So, I guess I'll just leave it for now; I'll monitor the talk page for further attacks and respond accordingly. As for double standards, I don't really know what to tell you. I don't think it's that there's one standard applied to one group and another applied to another group (though there is a bit of that, of course) so much as the simple fact that we all have our own set of standards, none of which completely agree with each other. The community has never been able to develop a single code for things like this, so we all just have to manage on our own as best we can. 1882:, is effectively the same as a legal threat and should warrant a block based on the spirit of NLT. But I don't really know whether, if a rangeblock here is infeasible, we can extend that to semiprotecting the page. My instinct is that we can, but I would have to consider it before taking action. I'm also not familiar enough with rangeblocks in general or IPv6 blocks in particular to know whether that's a reasonable option, and so would have to consult some people for that, as well. I really hate to pass the buck to other admins (or ANI, gods forbid), because this is an issue that needs to be dealt with, but I just don't think I'll have enough time to give this the consideration it needs, and it's a situation that needs to be handled 3498:
such a thing.) I'll look into it, though, at least." I took this as an expression that you would look into it, and then get back to me. Do you plan any action at this time? It doesn't seem like it would be such a big deal to me. When Spartaz and Beeblebrox did the action in the other direction, they didn't even bother to leave a comment at my talkpage. It was non-issue, button flick action in the other direction. So why should it be moving mountains to reverse? Anyhow, let me know something, so I can go on to the next thing if I must. Colton Cosmic. 22 January, 2014, 14:21 UTC.
4588:
project/userspace. Now, of course the side-effects of such expression must be taken into account, but one doesn't need to invoke BLP/BDP (and certainly not AE in that respect) to do so. Not to mention that Eric didn't actually talk about the subject of the thread directly at all; he was making a more general point about suicide and our responsibility for it as Wikipedians. Was Eric insensitive? I don't think there's much dispute that the answer is yes. Would redaction of his comment be called for? A strong argument can certainly be made for it. Did it fall under BLP/AE? No.
4649:
BLP? I mean, the only thing there is really the comment (and subsequent ones) about his father, but somehow I don't get the impression that that was recent enough to fall under BDP, and that's certainly not what Kevin was referring to anyway. There's a somewhat subtle distinction here, but it's an important one. Nobody could read Eric's comment and be misled at all about what actually happened to the subject, and that's the point of BLP/BDP: it's not to prevent anyone from ever getting offended (which would fall under
2151: 3738:, as far as I know, the interaction ban was to prevent Bugs and Medeis from interacting from TRM, not to prevent them from interacting with each other. I don't really know, since I wasn't the one to impose it, although I'll admit I didn't word my message as precisely as perhaps I should've. I'm frankly not in particularly good shape to be ruling on this at this point. So, don't take my message as a literal description of the interaction ban, and I would probably say not to act on anything if in doubt. 4604:
processes that check an individual admin's authority. That was a bad move; the ends don't justify the means. It's just not BLP. That's not what BLP is for, and to use the special enforcement provisions for BLP in a case that doesn't involve a BLP violation is a misuse of them. And the fact that AE has more restrictions on how a decision can be reviewed makes it a significant misuse, as opposed to just a sort of "I filled out the BLP paperwork when I mean the IAR/do no harm paperwork" clerical error.
1298: 4796:
I have put a message on the bot owner's talk page and the bot owner removed the message, the bot is administrator protected because all editors are equal except some are more equal than others, where else? All I want is the bloody bot to stand off for a couple of hours after an edit before it puts its oar in, cos in several edits which do not show up on WP history cos I corrected them, it puts its oar in right in the middle of when I am doing a preview of a
2265: 1747: 713: 2393: 35: 4314: 1397: 1262: 4196:, but I'm going to pass on this one. (Briefly, though: please don't indulge in insults against people who aren't me on my talk page. That goes for everyone.) I'm feeling a bit burnt out by recent events, and so would rather not have to deal with a thing like this. I could go on, but I won't; it doesn't matter, and I doubt my musings on people's behavior or my reasons for requesting 'cratship are particularly interesting. 2481: 2423: 5254: 3836:
not twice but three times, and in such a pointed fashion (why did this specific editor have to make this specific edit moving all text besides mine despite the fact it rendered subsequent conversation confusing, why did this editor need to run to an admin to say what they'd done, then why did this editor need (once again) to comment on my edits?). Don't rush back, just don't. It's clear that there's more to this.
2196: 2072: 1797: 2363: 5209: 2545: 5155: 1989: 4761: 2054: 2047: 3165: 3670: 899: 3642: 1165: 1999: 4709:
psychiatric support, and that it was our fault that the deceased committed suicide. We don't, because we're not psychiatrists, and we can't actually know why he did it, that's what Eric's point was. If Eric was critical of anyone it was (again) the OP, not of the deceased. (And having a critical opinion of someone, or even expressing it, is still not
1213: 1862:
AcorruptionfreeIndia editing while logged out (that user was similarly tendentious regarding the issue). Would it make sense to semi-protect the talk page for, say, 24 or 48 hours to see if we can flush out the problem? I realise that this is drastic but if range-blocking is not possible then I cannot see another way forward. -
3821:, and explain on your page what the relation is between these two sections. We needn't clog up WK's page any more, and also you've made it more fully clear on your own page that you suspect both Medeis and me of being in bad faith. It'll have to wait a little, though, till I've taken care of some RL stuff. 4909:
We are both in good faith and there is no problem. The thing is it tends to kinda get in the way. I am not sure that turning it off is the best; you have responded to my grumbles but the author of the bot has not — in which case he should not run a bot. I do think that the links to get to the bot are
4795:
I didn't alter the header or discussion, I added underneath it. I thought a talk page was for things to be talked about; I didn't alter the discussion for the approval of a bot. What else am I to do? It is adminstrator protected so where else am I to go to express my disagreement? I have been to ANI,
4405:
blocked, so you can't really say that they've been allowed to go full-tilt.) I don't think I've yet told you to step down about this or other things, so I'm not entirely sure why you're lumping me in with "the rest", but that's whatever. I'm not trying to get you to stop defending yourself; it's just
3921:
TRM. No asking other people to pass stuff along. Please see the green text in the section above. I see that neither Jc37 nor Writ Keeper put the exact terms of the interaction ban on your page, or the pages of the other two, but rather left you to dig them out of a (now archived) ANI thread. I think
462:
Seriously, though? Sincerity mode? No, becoming a 'crat was/is not at all my long term goal. I saw that thread on BN, wherein they suggested that they could perhaps use more 'crats, and decided more or less on a whim to try it. It's not a job that appeals to me particularly. (I mean, just the name!
389:
I just noticed two things. a. "Except that, y'know, I didn't resign because of Eric's block, as I explained above". I think I've had to make similar statements in the past. Sometimes there is some density on the other side of the conversation spectrum. b. Writ Keeper. WRIT KEEPER. You've been wanting
4708:
sparring; none of these were mentioned in Kevin's rationale.) If Eric had asserted that they hadn't sought help, that might've been a BLP vio, but he didn't. In context, Eric was responding to the OP, who was suggesting that the deceased's use of a template meant that we had an obligation to provide
4648:
Where is Eric saying the equivalent of "that persons death is " here? He's not. There's nothing in there that actually talks about the subject. It makes a general point about suicide, and how WP is a terrible place to seek alternatives to it (and he is right). What is in there that actually violates
4571:
Hi: Your reading of BLP/BLD seems a bit off. BLP protects living/recently dead people from baseless statements period. People's opinions concerning a BLP/BLD subject is "information" about that subject - it is information about how a subject is viewed. Wikipedian's are suppose to be avoiding such
4441:
resorted to the personal attacks. He did, and continues to do so. That's the summary. Thirdly, NE Ent has made several errors at the AN/I thread which need resolution, I pointed them out and it was a shock to me that he wished to be judged on the quality of his contributions. The three he'd made
3096:
the process of the actual rename; if we have questions for you, we'll ask them before we start the process, so logging in to answer them won't hurt anything, as we won't have started it yet. It's not that you have to log out immediately once you make the request. And to be honest, it's probably okay
1570:
Well, the newer edits look legit, actually; it's apparently a VisualEditor thing. I recognize the format; looks like JSON, so rest assured that it is a thing. The earlier edits do look like the running of an unauthorized bot, but I wouldn't block or anything for what might have been test-running a
4856:
Yes that's fine and that is exactly what I shall do. Please allow me to apologise, I am not as quick as all that but I get there in the end, I am in the tradition of doing things slowly and well, so the BracketBot kinda foxes me by being so quick. I am sorry to take it to ANI it is the first time I
4230:
Regarding BMK and RS: RS needs to stop uncollapsing navboxes and BMK needs to stop collapsing navboxes until there is a clear consensus somewhere. Until then, the status quo is not going to kill anyone. Wikiproject consensus doesn't outweigh sitewide consensus, but it outweighs individual opinion.
4140:
TRM, that really makes no sense at all, even if meant as an insult (as it clearly was). There's no way that it parses to make sense. You know, I've reached a personal determination of your worth as an admin, as I have expressed above, but I've not done so for your worth as an editor. Please tell
3777:
1. The Rambling Man is banned from any interactions with Medeis and Baseball Bugs, indefinitely. Baseball Bugs and Medeis are banned from any interactions with The Rambling Man, indefinitely. These bans include article, talk, wikipedia, and user space, without exception. No mention of the others or
529:
tags mean is that whatever's inside there (in this case, the doc template), doesn't get inserted into the page along with the rest of the template when it's transcluded or substituted; it basically marks stuff that only shows up when you're looking at the template page itself, not when the template
4456:
Oddly enough, I was just typing something up on Tenebrae's talk page as you posted this, so yeah, I agree with you there. My point is that you can point out that incorrectness, etc. without having to imply that all of NE Ent's contributions are of no quality. Obviously, the same kind of point goes
3835:
Not at all. I'm experiencing genuine one-sided implementation of an interaction ban that has been in place and without confusion since 15 January. All subsequent chatter has been about the second option, nothing to do with the interaction ban, an interaction ban which has been violated not once,
3497:
Hi Writ. You said, on Jan. 16, "Heh, I know that's an option, but if I do it on my own initiative, it'd likely be overturned quickly, which will leave none of us any better off. Patience. ;) (I also am not planning on being particularly available over the next 24 hours, which would not be good for
1877:
Hey, Sitush,I'm really sorry, but I don't think I'll have time to handle this today. (Worked late, woke up late, have a Christmas party to go to, etc. etc.) My general sense is that you're correct: repeatedly bringing up the legal issue in an obvious attempt to induce a chilling effect, even when
609:
No, A7 didn't fit it at all, because A7, as with all other CSD, is supposed to be strictly defined, and "building" is not one of the things (and neither is "non-notable building" a CSD criterion). There's a time and place for IAR, but CSD of a relatively harmless article about a building, even if
589:
I retagged the article under a different criteria. Please look at the history of the article, I nominated it for AFD no one commented, it was suggested that it was nominated for csd. A7 wa a great criteria for it, when you declined it, I retagged as it has no notability whatsoever. It's not rocket
500:
Thanks for fixing the Jclemens edit I did. I actually thought I hadn't saved it (just previewed it). When I realized I was wrong and the "documentation" thingamajigger shouldn't be there, I was about to remove it, but you beat me to it. One of the problems I've found (among many) since becoming an
239:
Heh, well, he's the one who pinged you, but I did bring it up first; I didn't have your full username in mind, so I just said "rms", and Trevj was supplying the full username. Not sure why it needed a ping, but whatever; I guess there's no harm in letting you know that you were mentioned, even in
4619:
Your statement is still a bit unclear. First BLP/BLD applies anywhere on Knowledge (XXG). So, if someone says anywhere on the Pedia something like 'that person is ' or 'that persons death is ' and it's "a controversial" statement, and they are not using a source, they run afoul of BLP/BLD. We
4259:
I couldn't give a toss about BMK, just that calling people ASSHOLEs and generally using personal attacks to get his own way needed to be discussed, that's it. Seemed like he was on full tilt, determined to lull me into discussing interaction ban and topic ban nonsense which had no bearing on the
564:
What I find funny is someone flying in out of nowhere claiming to be so "involved" that they need to open an ArbCom case. It's like certain editors out there on ANI, jumping into every discussion with their oh so reasonable look how policy based my comments are commentary. I hear one howling now.
545:
Thanks for the pointers. That's not what happened, though. David, who opened the case, did whatever he did. He removed certain things properly, but also removed other things he shouldn't have removed. I was just trying to correct it, but the doc stuff clearly didn't belong. I should've seen it in
5007:
can write one. I am just slow and old fashioned and do everything by hand (I still edit in the plaintext editor), but that is my fault: and anything that encourages others to make it easier to improve the encyclopaedia is a good thing, and undoubtedly BracketBot is a good thing. It is just a bit
4381:
I take it, but seriously, the links provided were all wrong. Most AN/I lurkers won't bother even checking, or understanding the context. Given there's been a call from yet another incompetent editor to provide me with a symmetric ban (which would now be punitive) I am obliged to respond at the
3982:
a number of times before, I do not take it lightly, especially when the editor in question has neither a policy nor a guideline he can cite to justify his reversion, simply his impression of "common practice". I would ask you to take notice of this situation, and intervene if and when it becomes
1953:
IPv4 range. Trivial, indeed. Anyway, looks like the IP has cooled off on the legal pseudothreats (no "chilling effect" pun intended), and while they're not exactly inspiring confidence in their "I don't care about Knowledge (XXG)'s rules" attitude, they are at least trying to discuss things, so
4879:
Of course, no worries. :) For my part, I apologize if I was a little curt with you. I know you didn't mean anything by it, and nothing you did was totally unreasonable. It's just that sometimes, if someone's going about something in the wrong way, we have to give one a gentle nudge in the right
4676:
OK. But I can see how one might consider it in context a disparagement of the dead (criticism) -- and it is misleading insofar as no one in that conversation knows all the things the dead did to avoid their fate (there is no reason to assume he templated and did not seek help). Finally, I will
4603:
Let me expand: my issue is not the goal of quashing the discussion. As I mentioned, I think a very reasonable argument could be made to redact it. But invoking the BLP AE sanctions to do so was a mistake, and a big one. It doesn't apply, and the use of AE sanctions exempts it from the regular
4587:
In articles, yes, of course. But a post to a user talk page is a different story, and that's what this was; Eric had posted his opinion in a thread on Jimbo's talk page. I don't see any way that that falls under BLP/BDP, however distasteful. Expression of personal opinion is not disallowed in
4515:
messages tonight too. Point is I never, ever resorted to such offensive and personal attacks, and still won't, yet the editor, blocked for such, continued to do so on his talk page. Finally, I'd like someone to actually point me to a body of work where my "inane" edits make personal attacks
411:
Trains, what trains? Who am I, Mussolini? Or was it Hitler who was fêted for getting the trains to run on time? Very likely both of them. Oh... right... Young Darwinfish got grounded because of absence of trains to the North Pole. Right. Sure, trains running, storm has passed. Feel free take
5132:
page. Even if they did, such things are not the way Knowledge (XXG) edits are attributed; rather, the contributors to the page are attributed through the page history function that is available on every page. What exactly were you trying to do? What is this script, and what is it supposed to
3430:
Probably the second option is best. It's certainly something they're allowed to do, given that they own both accounts, assuming that they can still log into both accounts to prove that they do. As far as the username is concerned, I don't think it's a problem, as Route 20 isn't a company or
524:(the help page on mediawiki). I think the mw one is probably more useful. What happened here is that it looks like there's some sort of standardized template for arb case requests, and that you copied and pasted the code of the template into it, instead of substing as is expected. What those 1861:
is continuing to bang the "legal threat" drum and isn't really saying much else that is policy compliant because, for example, their sources are useless and they're relying on original research/synthesis. I'm not sure whether it is feasible to range block and I'm pretty sure that this is
4236:
Regarding BMK and TRM: Do I understand correctly that two people who have each been here for 9 years, have each made over 100,000 edits, and each of whom obviously has the best interests of the project at heart, are incapable of behaving like grownups with each other? Here, use this:
4836:, rather than re-editing the old page. However, given the existence of the really quite flexible and accommodating opt-out alternatives, a review of the BRFA is not going to change anything, unless the bot is actually malfunctioning. Please just opt out of the bot and let this go. 4436:
Firstly, Tenebrae continues to personally attack me on his talk page. It's your responsibility to act on that, given his current block is as a result of personal attacks. Secondly, maybe it's me, but I don't get this "belittle" thing. Tenebrae and I had a lively discussion. I
2591:
and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! May the 2014 goes well for you.
3502:
Sorry, I simply forgot. Anyway, I discussed it with Spartaz via email, and they said that they wouldn't stand in the way, so I've restored your talk page access. As I said on Lady's page, you need to let go of the past and focus on what you're going to do going forward.
4638:
be an opinion; it's an assertion of fact (based on opinion). It's still asserting something to be true (that they are, in fact, ) that hasn't been backed by sources, and so subject to BLP. But that's not what Eric did, and that's not what Kevin invoked BLP for. Look at
4827:
I've mentioned it twice in the ANI thread already (including in the second response to the original post), and a few others have mentioned it as well: you can turn the bot off for yourself only, without having to block it for everyone. Again, the instructions are at
2873: 546:
preview, but for some reason I screwed up that part. I've been making minor errors along those lines lately because of being distracted by my real life, which muddles my brain. Yesterday, I blocked a sock without putting a reason in the block form (don't think I've
4951:
but rather it should be opting in. I didn't opt in and I don't see why I should have to opt out. Knowledge (XXG) editors used to edit things without bots contantly trampling over their feet, they took time and care over them. I shouldn't have to "opt out" of that.
4477:
used personal attacks, he did, including "freakish obsessive", "Crazy", "troll with no life", "basement-dwelling Brit-twit", "obsessive eccentric", yet even after being blocked, Tenebrae calls me an "abusive obsessive", and it's just "oh, Tenebrae, do stop....!".
3073:
8. Check back on this page periodically to answer any questions that may arise regarding your request. Please be patient. It may take a few days for your request to be completed. If you do not answer any questions, your request may be declined due to no response.
664:"A gurdwara (Punjabi: ਗੁਰਦੁਆਰਾ, gurduārā or , gurdwārā), meaning the gateway to the guru, is the place of worship for Sikhs" I have replied on the CSD page as it seems easier to discuss the criteria expansion and not have you getting tagged teamed here and there. 925:
Those rights don't flip on there own and those pages do have to be updated (grumble, grumble). In any event, welcome aboard Writ Keeper, and you'll find a mailbox on the left of the executive washroom in which you can leave our share of your contri…/*glurg*/. --
3551:
Sure, but I can't do it right this second (even though the consensus does seem to be clear, I'd still rather take the time to look at the whole discussion). If I don't close it in the next few hours, feel free to smack me upside the head via talk page again.
2315: 390:
to be a bureaucrat since the day you got here, didn't you? Keeping your little writs, while the rest of us are trying to write for keeps. I should have seen right through you all those years ago in DC, and why did we never have a beer? We didn't, did we?
2924:
I'm not sure about thanks, but I got two barnstars out of it, not that I'm counting or anything. :) On the more general issue of rude language, I suppose I'd say "there's a time and a place for everything." The arbitration pages are rarely the place for
111:
Nevermind, it's just easier to get rid of all the fancy ifeq/switch crap and just type in the stupid message by hand. I remember when I was a boy they just had a coordinator type in a new message at 00:01 UTC whenever a deadline passed. Kids these days.
4472:
Fair, but I saw nothing in NE Ent's recent contributions that improved Knowledge (XXG). Tenebrae, on the other hand, has been issued a "smacked wrist" despite continuing with the behaviour that led to the original block. This is becoming a joke. I
2499:
and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
2445:
and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
2890:
It's more effective when it's rare, isn't it? Thank you, Brad. May I ask how many thanks you got for the edit? (The original one, not the slightly later one you link to there.) How interesting it would be if we could see a recipient's thanks log.
610:
non-notable, is not it (well, really, CSD in general is not it). If you feel it's necessary, just wait awhile and send it back to AfD; I'll keep it on my watchlist and contribute to the AfD, so at least it won't just be you to have commented.
4645:
When did WP become a psychiatric hospice? People commit suicide every day, my own father did, but the reasons aren't always what you think they are. If you have mental health problems go see a doctor, don't plaster a template on your talk
5042:
By the way I didn't mean to imply the author of BracketBot is an idiot. Just now the WikiMedia software allows scripting languages, I am waiting for a flood of bots, templates, etc by people who are idiots. Still, we cannot anticipate a
2674:
Hey, Niko, welcome to Knowledge (XXG)! Linking to wikipages is pretty easy, and it's the same on your userpage as it is anywhere else. To do it, simply enclose the text you're linking in double square brackets: So, if you type in
3091:
Well, the idea is that, for accounts with many edits, it can take the system some time to go through and reassign all of the edits to the new name, and staying logged-out makes that a bit easier. But that's only really important
3273:
Yep, no worries; it's understandable. All the same, though, it's generally not a good idea to modify other people's posts, even when there is an obvious typo. It's usually better to ask them to clarify/fix themselves if needed.
3366:
Yeah, he's probably still automatically logged into the old username, and because of SUL, the software automatically recreates the old username for him. Not much to be done, other than dropping him a note on his old talk page.
2766:
Hey Writ Keeper, I was wondering if you knew what I could reply to a schizophrenic Knowledge (XXG) user whose username is Nathan Bäcker of whom appears to be having a schizophrenic episode and sound crazy on his own talk page?
3922:
that's a pretty good excuse for your mistake, so I strongly urge all admins to not block Medeis over this. I'm going to try to simplify things for you and the others by copypasting the interaction ban terms to all your pages.
2909:
a user's thanks log, just not what edit they were thanked for. Making reasonable assumptions, it looks like only 2 people thanked NYB for that edit. Plus whatever humor barnstars or other on-wiki appreciation he received.
1916:
No problem - real life is far more important, and your mom even more so. I haven't got a clue who is good with rangeblock calculations but I guess I'll find someone if I dig deep enough (maybe there a category for this). -
501:
arbitration clerk trainee is I think it requires a deeper understanding of how templates work than I have. Do you have any suggestions about how I can learn more about such things (assuming I ever find the time)? Regards.--
3392:? I'm happy to accept their appeal, but could use some advice regarding the renaming process - given that they apparently want to abandon the username Nhwxtracker and use Route20 instead, would it be more appropriate to: 5008:
annoying and I wish it would not be quite so keen.... but I will live with it. Thank you for taking the time to respond to me; I am sure we both are just trying to make Knowledge (XXG) a little better day by day, I know
4966:*shrug* Well, I don't really know what to tell you about that. I see what you mean, but there is precedent for opt-out bots: BracketBot isn't the first one to operate on people's edits as an opt-out system. If anything, 4804:
or whatever, and I can't give the revision history because I had to do it again before I saved it. I just would like it to stand off a little, a couple of hours after the last edit. I am not asking to change the world.
3567:
It's more a case of "I don't want to keep bumping the thread to prevent archiving, as I suspect that'll put admins off even more" than a super massive rush. I completely agree that you should read the whole discussion.
4699:
Well, it certainly wasn't a blog; it was a conversation that Eric joined and didn't start. If anyone was in violation of NOTBLOG, it was the OP, not Eric. NOTFORUM isn't particularly relevant; that's about not turning
3684:
For closing the community sanctions for Bugs Bunny, Medeis, and The Rambling Man thread, as well as other contentious discussions with great care and sound logic I hereby give you this barnstar. Keep up the good work.
3077:
My question to you is how will I be able to answer any possible questions, as mentioned in Step 8, if I have to log out of my account, as mentioned in Step 7? Please reply when you have a chance. Thank you.
3757:), and as I'd not participated in the original ban discussion nor in the post-enactment review of whether it had been closed properly, I didn't realise that it wasn't meant to be a three-way interaction ban. 1519:
Oh, I see what you're saying. Yes, it is supposed to do that. Well, it still works for me, so I can't really say what's going wrong for you; there's nothing in it that should be browser-specific or anything.
3715:— is there some sort of "you can talk to each other" exception to the interaction ban? Please note that I'm not personally concerned; my only participation has been to unblock Bugs on procedural grounds. 2691:, but the link still takes you to the Kasta page. (By the way, that vertical line in that example is a pipe character; on most US keyboards, you can get it by typing Shift and \ to get |.) Does that help? 5104:
Thank you for your notes and speedy deletions. Do you understand that I am linking the orgigianl content back to the my original body of work and your speedy deletions are keeping the functionality of the
4773:......ten minutes too late, but still...................................................................................................................................................................... 4520:
basis. Not your job, but worth you noting that I made several attempts to elicit a clear response from the editor in question, just to be responded to in an increasing and depressingly hostile fashion.
2290:
I don't usually leave "talkback" messages, but since it's been more than a week since you posted, mentioning here that I've finally replied to your message on my talkpage. Hope it helps somehow. Regards,
126:
Cool; I tried fiddling with it, but I think one of the templates (the one that determines where within a given span of dates the current time falls) has an error in it. Speaking of thankless jobs, I saw
968:
Wholehearted Congratulations! I've always had faith and trust in you both as an editor and administrator :-) And as Acalamari said above, I'm sure you'll do good work as a bureaucrat too. Best wishes!
93: 1324: 4857:
have ever done so but I hope you understand I come in good faith (a bit annoyed admittedly). Thank you for your advice. Rest assured I did not remove or alter the bot approval at the talk page.
1316: 4492:*sigh* Well, the post I was going to write included a clear message that any repetition would result in extension of the block and/or talk page revocation, but my post was lost in one of those 678:
Sure, thanks; that's certainly the right place to discuss expanding the criteria. (As an aside, I don't have any problem with expanding the criteria to include buildings; we just have to do so
4832:. If you want to contest the bot's approval, you can, but editing that page is not the place to do it; rather, follow the instructions in the header that tell you to start a thread at 3431:
anything; there's no rule against usernames that make you look like a single-purpose account, only ones against promotional or role accounts. What they need to do is make a request to
3983:
necessary to do so. I have asked the editor to stop, and if he does, all very well, but if he continues, I would like something to be done about it, if at all possible. Thanks.
1312: 719: 712: 255:
I'm very sorry about that. It wasn't a deliberate ping, more just a link in case participants there were curious. I'll give such actions fuller consideration in the future.
2278: 1764: 1710:
Hey WK, got a problem with the syntax of the first external link--it's got all those square brackets in there. Didn't you help me with a problem like that before? Thanks,
745: 4704:
talk pages into discussions of the subject, rather than discussions about how to improve the article. (Though in passing, I really don't have much interest in a round of
1427:
Hi Writ Keeper, sorry to disturb you, but your "rollback all" script is not working properly—it is only rolling back the first edit out of all of a user's contributions.
4910:
rather obscure, but that's another matter (it was only you who pointed me at the bot's page, it is not on the author's page or anywhere linked through that I could see).
4620:
don't want to run-down living/recently dead people with just 'shooting the crap' about them with our personal opinions (it's both unkind and unprofessional, right?).
3874:
ones to the earlier template. TRM voted in each, so I didn't copy his statement, but he may want to comment again or further at the earlier nomination. Thanks.
3046:
You are a life saver, thank you very much. I will take your advice and I will come to you in case I have trouble. Thank you for your help and understanding.
4260:
matter at hand, but thankfully several other editors who clearly care about him had a quiet word. Not at all interested in your cage match goading, thanks.
4653:); it's to prevent us from misleading people about things that really happened in a way that will hurt real people or their family/friends/etc. Your example 3870:? There were duplicate nominations, so, as usual procedure, I closed the later nomination. Since there were already votes on the duplicate, I copied the 2853:
responded with "Fuck off". Where was it? I can't have dreamt it, can I? Maybe a month ago? (The only thing I'm sure of is that the request was rejected.)
4064:
Honestly, neither of you is better than the other (nor I than either of you) at behaving "appropriately" (whatever the hell that means), so just drop it.
1630:
This user copied one sentence from a guide to appealing blocks on the unblock request. Please either deny the request or revoke talk page access. Thanks!
2632:
Happy New Year, WK. Looks like you have a lot of New Year banners above; I won't do that, as it isn't that personalized. Anyway, have a prosperous year!
4200:
owes me one, you might try her; she strikes me as reasonable. Though, on reflection, apparently she and TRM are in a snit on my talkpage, so maybe not.
3388:
Hi Writ Keeper. For once, I come to you with a procedural, rather than a technical request - can I get you to cast your eye over the unblock request at
2040: 131:
and am thinking about running for 'crat, since renames are a thing I'd consider doing (well, the only thing among the crat jobs, really, but still).
413: 3606:. Could you do it now? Also the closure doesn't indicate any fixed length for the interaction ban, but on the talk page of the concerned editors ( 3117: 3082: 3050: 2960:
As a sidenote, Wikipedians seem to be surprisingly unfamiliar with the fact that obscenity, vulgarity, and profanity are three different things.
1442:
Well, my mass rollback script just calls the rollback right, so any bug like that would likely be Mediawiki's, not mine. Can you provide diffs?
188:
Hi Writ Keeper, I don't usually do this, but I'd like to say that I think your answer to question #7 (by Epicgenius) is excellent. :) Good luck!
3403:
I'm not sure whether the rename request would be accepted, so if you wouldn't mind answering with your bureaucrat trousers on, I'd be grateful.
2330: 460:
Whereas you've only put up with me since the day I got here to bide your time until the perfect moment to use that pun came along, haven't you?
128: 3097:
for you anyway; I think that instruction is more for people on the order of thousands of edits. Anyway, I wouldn't worry too much about that.
850:
Hey, Trevj, sorry for not answering, but I've been on a plane. Yeah, it's just a joke account, amde for humor. I'm a big H.P. Lovecraft fan.
2651:
Hello i am Niko. i would like to know how to put wiki page links onto my userpage. For exmple a link to Kasta. Can you help me out? please? (
1006:
Awesome. You are now a 'crat, with over a hundred support votes. Maybe you can take the next step and become a founder. (Nah, just kidding.)
3064: 2794:." However, since it's attached to your name I wanted to consult with you first. Would you mind? By the way, I much appreciate the script!-- 1366:
Article writing is not everything, and improving the language of those who write articles has multiplying effects. I forgot to mention your
1181:
Again, thanks all. I just did my first rename, and the wiki hasn't exploded yet, so I guess it's all right? Still time, though, I suppose.
4002:
before he showed up to revert my edit, which was within policy. I must ask that you warn this editor that his behavior is bordering on
1320: 1901:
As I submitted that, I heard that my mom is going to the hospital (nothing too serious, but still), so yeah, the above is doubly true.
2791: 3753:
Thanks for the clarification. What little I knew about the situation was from reading closures several days ago (around the time of
2748:
i feel pretty bad got beat up earlier on have broken ribs so in much pain. if it was possible id stop breathing then it would hurt. (
5188: 5140: 5079:
was very insightful. I may quote it, but if experience is any measure, I'll probably forget where I heard it, hence this comment. --
4981: 4891: 4843: 4720: 4668: 4611: 4595: 4503: 4464: 4423: 4367: 4215: 3954: 3745: 3631: 3559: 3510: 3478: 3442: 3374: 3337: 3281: 3240: 3147: 3104: 3032: 2976: 2816: 2732: 2698: 2601: 1961: 1908: 1893: 1652: 1578: 1542: 1527: 1485: 1449: 1354: 1188: 1032: 857: 796:
Thanks. Yes, I s'pose I could sort of guess. I !voted, then spotted this and just wondered why no one had apparently asked! Cheers.
689: 656: 645:
is a building. It's not the organization inside the building, it's just the building. That kind of twisting is exactly what we're
617: 537: 470: 333: 247: 205: 138: 5012:
etc, but just a little bit better. Thank you for your kind and considered comments, I do appreciate that you took time to respond.
3783: 3435:
as Nhwxtracker and then log into Route20 and make a confirmation edit to the same request, to prove that both accounts are theirs.
3351:
Could you remind or guide this user as to what he's supposed to do? Currently he seems to be using both accounts simultaneously.
2231:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! 2108:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! 1826:, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! 3173: 1125: 4386:. I'm sure you'll tell me, once again, to step down, but you should be aware of what you and the others at AN/I are defending. 3169: 326:
See, now I'm tempted to go back in and edit my nom statement to say "I'd like to think I'm pleasantly aromatic." Bad influence.
240:
such a relatively harmless context as this. I would've told you, but again, I wanted to avoid the appearance of canvassing. :)
4360:
I did, but I was travelling that day and couldn't respond immediately, and I kinda forgot about it later. I'll reply in a bit.
3396:
Unblock their Route20 account and block Nhwxtracker instead (and request that they list the blocked account on their userpage)?
4162:
If you have anything else to say to me, say it to me, not via Writ Keeper's talkpage... this is becoming incredibly tedious.
3129: 1347:
Thanks very much, Gerda; I'm not sure that I deserve it (how few articles I've written!), but I'll accept it nonetheless. :)
21: 4238: 4050:
TRM, you are in no position to advise anyone on behavior. Period. You are a disgrace to the Knowledge (XXG) admin corps.
3909: 3778:
their actions shall be permitted. These may be appealed to the community not less than one year after they become effective.
776: 3969:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
3780: 5276: 4410:
people's contribution patterns can be a useful datapoint sometimes, but their editing patterns don't invalidate what they
4281:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
3460: 3419: 2029: 1858: 3528:
please? It's been open for quite a while, and the consensus is clear, yet no uninvolved admin seems to want to close it.
3114: 3079: 3047: 2587:. Wishing you a happy and fruitful 2014 with good health and your wishes come true! This greeting (and season) promotes 3206:
I just got a mailing list subscription request from you that I'm 99.9% sure is you, but just to verify, can you please
3177: 1267:
Have this beer for your successful RfB. Many Many congrats for becoming a crat. Hope you like your new responsibility.
2271: 2264: 1121: 1090: 881: 833: 808: 765: 737: 267: 5128:
Hmm, no, I don't really understand what you're saying. Most of the pages you created didn't link to anything but the
1949:
Heh, it's funny, but that illustrates how different IPv4 and IPv6 are; a /64 block is about 2 times the size of the
1307:
Thank you, dreaming reigner of irony with bureaucrat headaches and a life of your own, for quality articles such as
5229: 5004: 4526: 4483: 4447: 4391: 4265: 4241:, argue til you're both blue in the face, just don't expect others to pick a side when you're both acting silly. -- 4167: 4127: 4091: 4041: 3841: 3808: 669: 632: 599: 42: 2945:
What!? A public thanks log!? With time stamps!? That's the last time I f***ing thank anyone! Thanks, Floquenbeam.
4735: 4690: 4625: 4577: 4204:
owes me one too, but he's on Arbcom now, and doesn't deign to associate with the issues of lesser mortals. Maybe
3772: 3409:- I don't think the username policy specifically prohibits this, but it might be something to factor in. Cheers, 3126: 2829: 2799: 1308: 4551:
I've sent you a quick email. Nothing hugely important, just a little note/thanks regarding one of your scripts.
4003: 3979: 2597: 1595: 105: 4416:
So, in summary, I think you can find a way to defend yourself without having to tack that other stuff on, too.
2984: 2950: 1932: 997: 976: 944: 224: 5009: 4650: 1025:? That can't be right." But after five minutes or so of double-checking, I found that it was indeed a thing. 3125:
Your welcome and thank you again for changing my username. You've made my day a great day. :-) THANK YOU!!!
2405: 1686: 4295: 4146: 4109: 4055: 4011: 3988: 3207: 2772: 2150: 1753: 1746: 4442:
there were incorrect, out of context and misleading. Done deal. I'm sick of dancing around the lurkers.
2787: 1571:
script for three edits nearly a month ago. I'll keep an eye on them, but I don't see any problems of note.
5118: 4328: 1635: 1375: 1335: 988:
Wholehearted congrats also. I might even have voted support for you (.. if you could have pledged to make
4833: 3399:
Leave Route20 blocked and encourage them to request usurpation of the Route20 username from that account?
2683:. You can also create a link to a page with a title different from the words you're linking, like this: 2227:
and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
2104:
and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
1822:
and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a
5223: 5185: 5137: 4978: 4888: 4840: 4799: 4717: 4665: 4608: 4592: 4522: 4500: 4479: 4461: 4443: 4420: 4387: 4364: 4261: 4246: 4212: 4163: 4123: 4087: 4076: 4037: 3951: 3837: 3818: 3804: 3742: 3628: 3607: 3580: 3556: 3540: 3507: 3475: 3439: 3371: 3334: 3320: 3278: 3237: 3144: 3101: 3070:
7. Users with many edits should log out of their accounts to ensure the rename is carried out properly.
3029: 2965: 2934: 2915: 2881: 2813: 2729: 2695: 2296: 1958: 1905: 1890: 1649: 1607: 1575: 1539: 1524: 1482: 1446: 1351: 1185: 1029: 854: 686: 665: 653: 628: 614: 595: 534: 467: 330: 244: 202: 166: 151: 135: 117: 101: 51: 17: 4682: 3603: 2790:
along the lines of "Registered users wishing to add back the Orange Bar notification may do so through
2588: 2496: 2442: 2224: 2101: 1819: 1461: 4401:
Man, I don't know Tenebrae from a hole in the wall; I'm not defending them at all. (As an aside, they
5085: 4731: 4686: 4621: 4573: 3999: 3294: 3263: 3010:
now I've made a mess of it. Would you please look at my Talk page again? (Sorry to bother you.) --
2825: 2795: 2637: 2015: 1502: 1469: 1432: 1221: 1011: 4948: 4678: 3513: 5052: 5017: 4957: 4928: 4862: 4810: 4778: 4552: 4065: 3690: 3569: 3529: 3015: 2980: 2946: 2505: 2451: 2173: 1149: 1054: 993: 971: 940: 905:
Congrats. That looked too easy; how did they not find out about the campaign contrib... /*glurg*/
431: 359: 299: 72:'s programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this 1478:
Well, he had only made one edit to the page, so it looks like rollback's working correctly there.
4350: 4291: 4193: 4142: 4105: 4051: 4007: 3984: 3927: 3826: 3794: 3356: 2896: 2858: 2768: 2753: 2715: 2664: 2656: 2610: 2552: 2372: 2340: 2246: 2204: 1840: 1804: 1694: 1269: 3432: 2039: 1297: 1067: 96:. I don't think I broke anything, but if I did please quietly fix it without telling anyone. -- 2849:, but now I'm wasting all this time looking for the RFAR about somebody using bad words, where 1591: 5270: 5114: 4324: 3762: 3720: 3454: 3413: 3389: 1661: 1631: 1411: 1371: 1331: 753:(Only adding this notification here because the RfB is due for closing in a couple of hours.) 4705: 4320: 3063:
Hello, it's me again and I have a question. I had just finished reading the instructions on
625:
This is a specific organization inside a larger organization, it applies. I have opened this
73: 5182: 5168: 5134: 5101: 5044: 5003:
It's OK, I can live with it. Bots will get more intrusive now any idiot who knows a bit of
4975: 4885: 4837: 4714: 4662: 4605: 4589: 4497: 4458: 4417: 4361: 4313: 4242: 4209: 4201: 3948: 3898: 3879: 3739: 3625: 3611: 3553: 3504: 3472: 3436: 3368: 3331: 3316: 3312: 3275: 3234: 3220: 3192: 3141: 3098: 3026: 2961: 2930: 2911: 2877: 2850: 2810: 2726: 2692: 2535: 2392: 2356: 2292: 1955: 1940: 1922: 1902: 1887: 1867: 1730: 1715: 1669: 1646: 1600: 1572: 1561: 1536: 1521: 1479: 1443: 1396: 1367: 1348: 1261: 1182: 1026: 908: 851: 683: 650: 611: 570: 531: 464: 399: 327: 241: 199: 162: 147: 132: 113: 97: 3599: 3525: 591: 69: 5281: 5236: 5191: 5172: 5143: 5122: 5090: 5080: 5056: 5021: 4984: 4961: 4932: 4894: 4866: 4846: 4829: 4814: 4782: 4739: 4723: 4694: 4671: 4661:
fall under BLP, but that's not what I'm talking about, and that's not what happened here.
4629: 4614: 4598: 4581: 4561: 4530: 4506: 4487: 4467: 4451: 4426: 4395: 4370: 4353: 4332: 4299: 4269: 4250: 4218: 4171: 4150: 4131: 4113: 4095: 4081: 4059: 4045: 4015: 3992: 3957: 3930: 3902: 3883: 3845: 3829: 3812: 3797: 3766: 3748: 3724: 3694: 3652: 3634: 3618: 3585: 3562: 3545: 3481: 3465: 3445: 3424: 3377: 3360: 3340: 3324: 3298: 3290: 3284: 3267: 3259: 3243: 3227: 3216: 3196: 3150: 3132: 3120: 3107: 3085: 3067:
and I'm confused on both step 7 and step 8 and here is a copy a paste of those two steps:
3053: 3035: 3019: 2988: 2969: 2954: 2938: 2919: 2899: 2885: 2861: 2833: 2819: 2803: 2776: 2757: 2735: 2719: 2701: 2668: 2641: 2633: 2622: 2519: 2469: 2378: 2346: 2300: 2258: 2177: 2136: 2019: 2011: 1964: 1944: 1926: 1911: 1896: 1871: 1847: 1785: 1760: 1734: 1719: 1698: 1673: 1655: 1639: 1615: 1581: 1565: 1545: 1530: 1506: 1498: 1488: 1473: 1465: 1452: 1436: 1428: 1414: 1379: 1357: 1339: 1281: 1238: 1225: 1217: 1204: 1191: 1176: 1156: 1129: 1113: 1094: 1086: 1058: 1035: 1015: 1007: 1001: 983: 957: 948: 932: 911: 885: 877: 860: 837: 829: 812: 804: 790: 786: 782: 769: 761: 741: 733: 692: 673: 659: 636: 620: 603: 574: 559: 555: 540: 510: 506: 473: 451: 403: 379: 336: 319: 271: 263: 250: 233: 208: 192: 170: 155: 141: 121: 82: 3614:) you say it's for three months. Could you modify your closure to reflect that? Regards, 1886:, and with care. (As an aside, I still haven't heard back from legal about this.) Sorry. 4020:
Please advise the above user to avoid personal attacks in edit summaries as he has done
3867: 2046: 5253: 5048: 5013: 4953: 4924: 4858: 4822: 4806: 4774: 4141:
me that the lack of clarity in your statement isn't typical of your work as an editor.
3686: 3315:! Thank you for having invited me to the Teahouse! I will be happy to check it out! :) 3186:. It's bad enough that I have to "touch" an Auburn article without you making it worse. 3011: 2512: 2488: 2480: 2467: 2439: 2422: 2237: 2169: 2134: 2114: 2091: 1832: 1783: 1231: 1197: 1169: 1137: 1101: 1051: 954: 417: 391: 345: 285: 189: 5266:
For your mantic abilities with regards to my scripting requirements, have a barnstar!
2195: 2071: 1796: 1587: 1021:
Thanks, all. Yeah, when I was first moving my nomination into mainspace, I thought, "
521: 4346: 4197: 3923: 3822: 3790: 3731: 3649: 3615: 3406: 3352: 3330:
Good, glad to hear it! Let me know if you have any questions of me in particular. :)
2892: 2854: 2749: 2711: 2660: 2652: 2366: 2334: 1690: 1063: 517: 4947:
No no, I am sorry but I must disagree. It is not about "Opting Out" of BracketBot, U
3998:
The editor in question has once again begun following my edits. He had never edited
5267: 5208: 4967: 4122:
Seriously, from someone in your current position, I'll take that as a compliment.
3758: 3735: 3716: 3451: 3410: 2314: 2217: 2094: 1812: 1404: 929: 5154: 4086:
Luke, indeed. BMK, you seem to be looking for (yet another) block. Cool down.
5164: 5129: 4760: 4205: 3914: 3894: 3875: 3868:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:In_the_news/Candidates#Australian_Open_Tennis
3188: 2544: 2053: 1936: 1918: 1863: 1726: 1711: 1665: 1557: 566: 395: 79: 50:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
94:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2013#Header error
4033: 3211: 1988: 1081: 872: 824: 799: 756: 728: 551: 502: 484: 480: 258: 220: 4572:
expressions of personal opinion -- because what matters is what sources say.
3450:
So much wisdom in one so young... Thanks, have passed the recommendation on.
479:
That's such a boooring story that you're probably the right man for the job.
3669: 2459: 2431: 2228: 2220: 2123: 2105: 2097: 2080: 1823: 1815: 1772: 5221:
Thank your understanding, integrity, even wisdom, and for a job well done.
3707:
I'm not sure whether you're the re-closing admin or just the messenger for
3254:...for explaining to me what "OP" meant at ANI. I thought the editor meant 821:
was a genuine mistake, rather than some sort of attempt at humour. Cheers.
284:
Moral support for cratship. "I'd like to think I'm pretty" is good reason.
898: 642: 2929:, but once after six years of service I decided it was an IAR occasion. 3771:
That's right, it wasn't. This is the interaction ban, as formulated by
2868:
For this rare example of my use of Ericspeak in lieu of Bradspeak, see
2495:— is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes 2441:— is wishing you a Happy New Year! This greeting (and season) promotes 161:
By the way, that wasn't a suggestion or a request, it was a command. --
4974:
intrusive, and also opt-out. But that's just the way it is, I guess.
4884:
so gentle. But don't worry about it; it's all good. :) Happy editing!
1998: 1535:
Well, I tweaked a few things; maybe it'll make a difference. I dunno.
5161:
Thanks for the help, cat lover. Hope you're doing well in real life.
5106: 550:
done that before). I unblocked and reblocked with a reason. Ah me.--
1645:
It would be inappropriate for me, as the blocking admin, to do so.
4730:
Well, we may not have found agreement but thanks for the talk. --
3789:
and the parties themselves obviously aren't going to be confused.
2688: 2680: 1704: 897: 3258:, as these letters are very close to each other on the keyboard. 1209:
It might if Writ Keeper manages to make 100,000 edits in one day
5110: 3817:
Really? I'll assume that you're experiencing genuine confusion,
4406:
that you're doing it in an unnecessarily aggressive way. Yeah,
1556:
and their other contributions? Too clever for me. Squank you,
29: 4104:
Oh, we're giving friendly advice now? TRM, give up the bit.
2404:
Hope you are having a lovely time!!!! All the best for you!
627:] to add it specifically. I think you are way off base here. 5153: 4457:
for Tenebrae, which is the gist of the aforementioned post.
4192:
Y'know what? I'm sorry to leave you high and dry like this,
2543: 2479: 2421: 2391: 2281:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
2263: 2194: 2070: 2052: 2045: 2038: 1795: 1767:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
1745: 1321:
enlightening me on "badass", "yelling" and a cultural divide
748:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
711: 3025:
Nah, no worries, I'm happy to help. I've replied there.
1725:
Nevermind; I'm working on a different solution. Thanks,
1594:
can tell you more) -- this looks like one of the tasks (
1460:
was caused by clicking the button when trying to revert
5076: 4640: 4383: 4159: 4029: 4025: 4021: 3975: 3890: 3787: 3754: 3712: 3708: 3183: 2906: 2869: 2846: 2679:, you'll get a link to the Kasta page that looks like: 1553: 1457: 818: 720:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for bureaucratship/Writ Keeper
4923:
It is a good little bot but it can be a bit too keen.
4319:
You seem stressed out bud... Perhaps a beer will help
3405:
Of course, things are further muddied by his focus on
2604:}} to their talk page with a Happy New Year message. 4345:
Hi. I sent you an e-mail on Jan 31. Did you get it?
4208:
or someone, I dunno. Someone that's not me, please.
2060:
Season's greetings from Santa and her little helpers
2872:. For a couple of other examples, see the links in 1935:. Trivial to those that understand these things! - 928:Preceding unfinished and unsigned comment added by 907:Preceding unfinished and unsigned comment added by 935:He's probably not OK, WJBScribe got a hold of him… 4880:direction, and sometimes, teh second nudge isn't 2788:Knowledge (XXG):User pages#User talk notification 1407:Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} 953:Congratulations, Writ Keeper. You'll do well. :) 919:Yeah, Yeah. Y'all always beat the 'crats because 4657:mislead people, depending on the context, so it 3866:Could you do me a favor and tell TRM to look at 781:Can't you guess the purpose of the account from 516:Well, I figured it out through a combination of 3471:Hmph. Not as young as I was a couple days ago. 3307:Thank you for having invited me to the Teahouse 2508:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 2454:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 2331:the most important script you will ever install 2008:Merry Yuletides to you! (And a happy new year!) 1196:Yes, nothing wrong and the wiki won't explode. 530:is placed in other pages, if that makes sense. 2270:Hello, Writ Keeper. You have new messages at 2240:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 2117:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 1835:}} to their talk page with a friendly message. 1752:Hello, Writ Keeper. You have new messages at 787:Darwinbish, much more active and worrying sock 718:Hello, Writ Keeper. You have new messages at 3978:to your attention. As a person who has been 922:we actually have to do some work around here! 487:. That's right. 17:23, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 198:Heh, thanks, Acalamari. It's what I feel. :) 8: 4554: 4323:your nerves. Anyways, I wish you the best! 819:contradictory edit summary I've just spotted 4634:Of course, but first of all, that wouldn't 4006:and can result in a block if he continues. 3782:Don't worry, Writ, it's quite clear on the 1954:perhaps a block isn't indicated quite yet. 3661:Thanks for closing contentious discussions 3608:User_talk:Lukeno94#Interaction_ban_enacted 2710:Yes it does thnk you. How are you today? ( 1317:distinguishing "discussion" and discussion 1311:(Triumphs of Torlough), for believing in " 590:science WK, if ever there was a reason to 3667: 2312: 219:OK, no problems. Anyway I thought it was 4290:...for my incivility on your talk page. 3612:User_talk:Jaggee#Interaction_ban_enacted 3065:Knowledge (XXG):Changing username/Simple 1049:and all who sail in her? Welcome to it! 1493:…Oh. I thought it was supposed to undo 4644: 4239:User:Floquenbeam/BMK vs TRM cage match 3776: 2596:Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{ 2504:Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{ 2450:Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{ 2223:! This greeting (and season) promotes 2100:! This greeting (and season) promotes 1818:! This greeting (and season) promotes 1664:, that I hand out a copyvio block? :) 48:Do not edit the contents of this page. 1210: 7: 3965:The following discussion is closed. 2030:User:Sportsguy17/Happy Holidays 2013 2007: 1162: 418: 346: 286: 5181:I'm doing okay. One day at a time. 2786:I was thinking of adding a note at 1552:Hey big man, can you maybe look at 1070:to clean that sort of thing for us. 1066:'s dismembered remains - there are 87: 2809:Sure, no problem; that'd be fine. 2066:Merry Christmas from Cyberpower678 483:in terrible quality; better audio 64:The Knowledge (XXG) Library Survey 28: 3600:WP:ANI#A charge of wikihounding** 2602:User:Pratyya Ghosh/Happy New Year 5252: 5207: 4759: 4312: 4277:The discussion above is closed. 3668: 3640: 3174:List of Auburn University people 3163: 2361: 2313: 2149: 1997: 1987: 1395: 1296: 1260: 1211: 1163: 977: 972: 33: 3289:Got it. Thanks for the advice. 3210:to verify the address? Thanks. 3180:from editing Knowledge (XXG). 2975:ah yes, but then we're not all 2659:) 18:23, 3 January 2014 (UTC)) 1984: 1406: 1161:Congratulations and good luck! 785:? There are 14 of them in all. 432: 360: 300: 3947:Discuss it elsewhere, please. 3493:Your Comments at LoS' Talkpage 3176:. If you continue, you may be 2401:Happy New Year! Gott nytt år!! 2180:12:15, 24 December 2012 (UTC) 1853:IP at India Against Corruption 1: 5282:08:43, 21 February 2014 (UTC) 5237:00:13, 21 February 2014 (UTC) 5192:22:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC) 5173:22:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC) 5144:22:01, 20 February 2014 (UTC) 5123:21:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC) 5091:19:13, 19 February 2014 (UTC) 5057:08:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC) 5022:08:17, 18 February 2014 (UTC) 4985:00:39, 18 February 2014 (UTC) 4962:00:35, 18 February 2014 (UTC) 4933:00:26, 18 February 2014 (UTC) 4895:00:18, 18 February 2014 (UTC) 4867:00:13, 18 February 2014 (UTC) 4847:23:53, 17 February 2014 (UTC) 4815:23:48, 17 February 2014 (UTC) 4783:00:10, 15 February 2014 (UTC) 4740:21:48, 11 February 2014 (UTC) 4724:21:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC) 4695:21:24, 11 February 2014 (UTC) 4677:answer your NOTCENSORED with 4672:20:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC) 4630:20:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC) 4615:20:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC) 4599:19:53, 11 February 2014 (UTC) 4582:19:47, 11 February 2014 (UTC) 3172:other editors, as you did on 3115:Michael Crichton Stephen King 3080:Michael Crichton Stephen King 3048:Michael Crichton Stephen King 2417:Happy 2014 from Cyberpower678 2379:16:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC) 2347:16:42, 31 December 2013 (UTC) 2301:22:00, 27 December 2013 (UTC) 2272:Jeromesandilanico's talk page 2259:14:50, 25 December 2013 (UTC) 2236:Spread the cheer by adding {{ 2178:15:44, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 2165:are having a wonderful time! 2137:22:50, 24 December 2013 (UTC) 2113:Spread the cheer by adding {{ 2020:22:22, 22 December 2013 (UTC) 1985: 1965:16:18, 22 December 2013 (UTC) 1945:15:40, 22 December 2013 (UTC) 1927:21:58, 21 December 2013 (UTC) 1912:19:38, 21 December 2013 (UTC) 1897:19:33, 21 December 2013 (UTC) 1872:15:00, 21 December 2013 (UTC) 1859:Talk:India Against Corruption 1848:07:33, 22 December 2013 (UTC) 1842: 1831:Spread the cheer by adding {{ 1806: 1786:21:43, 21 December 2013 (UTC) 1761:21:43, 21 December 2013 (UTC) 1735:21:35, 21 December 2013 (UTC) 1720:21:15, 21 December 2013 (UTC) 1699:10:02, 21 December 2013 (UTC) 1674:18:51, 20 December 2013 (UTC) 1656:18:43, 20 December 2013 (UTC) 1640:18:42, 20 December 2013 (UTC) 1616:23:21, 20 December 2013 (UTC) 1582:18:54, 20 December 2013 (UTC) 1566:18:34, 20 December 2013 (UTC) 1546:17:19, 19 December 2013 (UTC) 1531:17:14, 19 December 2013 (UTC) 1507:13:44, 19 December 2013 (UTC) 1489:03:47, 19 December 2013 (UTC) 1474:03:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC) 1453:03:05, 19 December 2013 (UTC) 1437:02:53, 19 December 2013 (UTC) 1415:10:07, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 1380:10:16, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 1358:07:53, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 1340:07:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 1282:05:30, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 1239:16:55, 18 December 2013 (UTC) 1233: 1226:15:58, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 1205:11:14, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 1199: 1192:11:11, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 1177:11:07, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 1171: 1157:01:29, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 1130:23:37, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 1114:20:34, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 1095:20:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 1078:Congratulations from me too! 1059:12:14, 17 December 2013 (UTC) 1036:20:06, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 1016:20:02, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 1002:19:44, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 984:19:36, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 958:18:49, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 949:18:48, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 933:18:44, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 912:18:36, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 886:20:20, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 861:20:04, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 838:20:01, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 813:18:36, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 791:16:50, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 770:16:22, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 742:16:22, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 693:07:27, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 674:07:17, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 660:07:06, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 637:06:57, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 621:06:48, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 604:06:37, 16 December 2013 (UTC) 575:23:35, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 560:18:43, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 541:18:08, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 511:17:19, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 474:16:20, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 452:14:19, 15 December 2013 (UTC) 404:15:21, 14 December 2013 (UTC) 380:20:36, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 337:18:57, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 320:18:24, 13 December 2013 (UTC) 272:06:57, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 251:00:25, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 234:00:22, 12 December 2013 (UTC) 209:23:22, 10 December 2013 (UTC) 193:23:11, 10 December 2013 (UTC) 4562:19:12, 6 February 2014 (UTC) 4531:20:07, 6 February 2014 (UTC) 4507:20:02, 6 February 2014 (UTC) 4488:19:35, 6 February 2014 (UTC) 4468:19:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC) 4452:19:25, 6 February 2014 (UTC) 4427:19:18, 6 February 2014 (UTC) 4396:18:25, 6 February 2014 (UTC) 4371:05:47, 6 February 2014 (UTC) 4354:05:44, 6 February 2014 (UTC) 4333:21:44, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 4300:21:34, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 4270:20:23, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 4251:20:13, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 4219:19:34, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 4172:15:31, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 4151:15:26, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 4132:15:04, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 4114:14:55, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 4096:13:49, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 4082:13:42, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 4060:13:34, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 4046:13:19, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 4016:13:00, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 3993:16:45, 24 January 2014 (UTC) 3958:20:32, 28 January 2014 (UTC) 3931:21:48, 26 January 2014 (UTC) 3903:20:59, 26 January 2014 (UTC) 3884:20:51, 26 January 2014 (UTC) 3846:08:39, 27 January 2014 (UTC) 3830:08:28, 27 January 2014 (UTC) 3813:07:36, 27 January 2014 (UTC) 3798:13:25, 26 January 2014 (UTC) 3767:07:02, 26 January 2014 (UTC) 3749:06:41, 26 January 2014 (UTC) 3725:06:30, 26 January 2014 (UTC) 3711:, but I'm badly confused by 3695:15:17, 24 January 2014 (UTC) 3653:18:28, 23 January 2014 (UTC) 3635:18:19, 23 January 2014 (UTC) 3619:10:31, 23 January 2014 (UTC) 3586:22:02, 22 January 2014 (UTC) 3563:20:42, 22 January 2014 (UTC) 3546:20:38, 22 January 2014 (UTC) 3526:Knowledge (XXG):ANI#Proposal 3514:17:03, 22 January 2014 (UTC) 3482:20:06, 22 January 2014 (UTC) 3466:20:04, 22 January 2014 (UTC) 3446:19:55, 22 January 2014 (UTC) 3425:09:49, 22 January 2014 (UTC) 3378:20:02, 21 January 2014 (UTC) 3361:19:55, 21 January 2014 (UTC) 3341:17:39, 15 January 2014 (UTC) 3325:12:04, 15 January 2014 (UTC) 3299:02:39, 15 January 2014 (UTC) 3285:21:23, 14 January 2014 (UTC) 3268:21:20, 14 January 2014 (UTC) 3244:16:29, 14 January 2014 (UTC) 3228:16:09, 14 January 2014 (UTC) 3197:20:31, 13 January 2014 (UTC) 3151:21:23, 12 January 2014 (UTC) 3133:17:20, 12 January 2014 (UTC) 3121:15:35, 12 January 2014 (UTC) 3108:20:35, 11 January 2014 (UTC) 3086:14:13, 11 January 2014 (UTC) 3054:22:25, 10 January 2014 (UTC) 2514: 2490: 1497:of the user's recent edits. 419: 394:, those trains running yet? 347: 287: 171:16:19, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 156:16:18, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 142:16:17, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 122:16:06, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 106:15:44, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 83:14:46, 9 December 2013 (UTC) 4231:It's not stalking/hounding. 3524:Would you consider closing 3140:Of course, my pleasure. :) 3036:19:25, 8 January 2014 (UTC) 3020:18:59, 8 January 2014 (UTC) 2989:23:36, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 2970:23:31, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 2955:23:20, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 2939:23:14, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 2920:23:11, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 2900:23:06, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 2886:22:48, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 2862:22:35, 6 January 2014 (UTC) 2834:14:14, 5 January 2014 (UTC) 2820:02:24, 5 January 2014 (UTC) 2804:23:56, 4 January 2014 (UTC) 2777:18:48, 3 January 2014 (UTC) 2758:18:47, 3 January 2014 (UTC) 2736:18:41, 3 January 2014 (UTC) 2720:18:37, 3 January 2014 (UTC) 2702:18:31, 3 January 2014 (UTC) 2669:18:23, 3 January 2014 (UTC) 2642:20:10, 1 January 2014 (UTC) 2623:14:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC) 2520:09:45, 1 January 2014 (UTC) 2470:00:07, 1 January 2014 (UTC) 2323:The Barnstar of Good Humour 1402:Congrats on the promotion! 1099:Well done, have a t shirt. 70:The Knowledge (XXG) Library 5300: 5005:Lua (programming language) 4830:User:BracketBot#Opting_out 3893:shows he's aware. Thanks. 3602:, but forgot to log it at 3182:Mr. Bureaucrat, we can do 68:As a subscriber to one of 5251: 5206: 4949:ser:BracketBot#Opting_out 4758: 3917:, you're not supposed to 3703:Interaction ban confusion 3674: 2842:Profanity and drunkenness 2390: 2319: 2148: 1931:Apparently it would be a 1754:Cyberpower678's talk page 1370:, to end on "dreaming" -- 1309:Cathreim Thoirdhealbhaigh 649:supposed to do with CSD. 520:(the help page here) and 342:) Pronounces judiciously: 88:You're smart (er than me) 4279:Please do not modify it. 3967:Please do not modify it. 3803:See following section. 3006:Thank you very much, but 1313:rules-as-limits-on-power 4225:Someone rubbed my lamp. 4028:, and in edits such as 3889:On second glance, this 3492: 3113:Okay thank you again. 2979:are we.. ? (allegedly) 2824:Great, and it's done.-- 2406:Some nice beer for you! 1687:Legacy (2014 TV Series) 5158: 2548: 2484: 2426: 2396: 2268: 2199: 2164: 2075: 2057: 2050: 2043: 1800: 1750: 1122:Pharaoh of the Wizards 939:Good luck to you too! 902: 894:Beat the Crat Congrats 716: 5215:The Teamwork Barnstar 5157: 4767:Happy Valentine's Day 4511:Sure, I've had those 3347:Dave006 / Honest-john 2547: 2483: 2425: 2395: 2267: 2198: 2160: 2074: 2056: 2049: 2042: 1799: 1749: 1626:User_talk:Philipposit 901: 715: 496:Arbitration templates 46:of past discussions. 18:User talk:Writ Keeper 5260:The Surreal Barnstar 4078:(tell Luke off here) 4000:Arsenic and Old Lace 3784:editing restrictions 3773:Georgewilliamherbert 3678:The Admin's Barnstar 3582:(tell Luke off here) 3542:(tell Luke off here) 3127:Hitcher vs. Candyman 2725:I'm all right. You? 1304:triumphs of language 5245:A barnstar for you! 5200:A barnstar for you! 4834:Wikipedia_talk:BRFA 3520:Request for closure 3184:without your sneers 2564:— is wishing you a 2306:A Barnstar for you! 527:</noinclude: --> 223:who brought it up. 78:Thanks and cheers, 5159: 5109:from brending the 4713:a BLP violation.) 3974:I'd like to bring 3968: 3734:, you were right. 3202:wikien-bureaucrats 2549: 2485: 2427: 2397: 2279:remove this notice 2269: 2200: 2076: 2058: 2051: 2044: 1933:trivial rangeblock 1857:The dynamic IP at 1801: 1765:remove this notice 1751: 1660:What do you want, 1325:awesome Wikipedian 1057: 903: 746:remove this notice 717: 682:nominating them.) 594:it would be this. 526:<noinclude: --> 412:northern train to 5287: 5286: 5242: 5241: 5150:A kitten for you! 4788: 4787: 4516:justifiable on a 4384:abusive obssesive 4338: 4337: 3966: 3910:talk page stalker 3862:Please pass along 3700: 3699: 3484: 3390:User talk:Route20 3042:Thank you!!!! :-) 2991: 2957: 2782:Orange bar script 2687:would look like: 2414: 2413: 2352: 2351: 2216:is wishing you a 2184: 2183: 2093:is wishing you a 1992:Happy Yuletides! 1811:is wishing you a 1462:User:Hotcoffee 01 1420: 1419: 1287: 1286: 1120:Congratulations . 1071: 1050: 936: 915: 783:the contributions 777:talk page stalker 522:mw:Help:Templates 481:Here's your video 455: 436: 364: 304: 173: 129:this thread on BN 58: 57: 52:current talk page 5291: 5279: 5273: 5256: 5249: 5248: 5235: 5225:7&6=thirteen 5211: 5204: 5203: 5102:User:Writ Keeper 5088: 5083: 5045:moron in a hurry 4826: 4803: 4763: 4756: 4755: 4559: 4558: 4523:The Rambling Man 4480:The Rambling Man 4444:The Rambling Man 4388:The Rambling Man 4316: 4309: 4308: 4262:The Rambling Man 4164:The Rambling Man 4124:The Rambling Man 4088:The Rambling Man 4074: 4071: 4068: 4038:The Rambling Man 4032:. Looks like a 3913: 3838:The Rambling Man 3819:The Rambling Man 3805:The Rambling Man 3672: 3665: 3664: 3648: 3644: 3643: 3578: 3575: 3572: 3538: 3535: 3532: 3470: 3463: 3457: 3422: 3416: 3226: 3223: 3167: 3166: 2974: 2944: 2686: 2678: 2619: 2618: 2615: 2585: 2583: 2574: 2571: 2568: 2561: 2560: 2557: 2538: 2533: 2530: 2527: 2516: 2506:subst:New Year 1 2492: 2462: 2452:subst:New Year 1 2434: 2388: 2387: 2375: 2369: 2365: 2364: 2359: 2343: 2337: 2317: 2310: 2309: 2282: 2255: 2254: 2251: 2213: 2212: 2209: 2190:Merry Christmas! 2153: 2146: 2145: 2129: 2128: 2086: 2085: 2009: 2001: 1995: 1994: 1991: 1979:Happy holidays 2 1844: 1808: 1778: 1777: 1768: 1613: 1610: 1603: 1413: 1408: 1399: 1392: 1391: 1300: 1278: 1277: 1274: 1264: 1257: 1256: 1235: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1201: 1173: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1154: 1147: 1142: 1110: 1109: 1107: 1084: 1061: 990:"bureaucratship" 979: 974: 927: 924: 909:User:Floquenbeam 906: 875: 827: 802: 780: 759: 749: 731: 666:Hell In A Bucket 629:Hell In A Bucket 596:Hell In A Bucket 528: 448: 434: 428: 427: 410: 376: 362: 356: 355: 316: 302: 296: 295: 261: 231: 160: 37: 36: 30: 5299: 5298: 5294: 5293: 5292: 5290: 5289: 5288: 5277: 5271: 5247: 5222: 5202: 5152: 5098: 5086: 5081: 5073: 4820: 4797: 4793: 4754: 4732:Alanscottwalker 4687:Alanscottwalker 4622:Alanscottwalker 4574:Alanscottwalker 4569: 4553: 4549: 4379: 4343: 4307: 4305:A beer for you! 4288: 4283: 4282: 4072: 4069: 4066: 4004:WP:WIKIHOUNDING 3971: 3962: 3961: 3960: 3942: 3907: 3864: 3705: 3663: 3641: 3639: 3596: 3576: 3573: 3570: 3536: 3533: 3530: 3522: 3495: 3461: 3455: 3420: 3414: 3386: 3349: 3309: 3252: 3221: 3214: 3204: 3164: 3161: 3061: 3044: 3008: 2847:Glad to hear it 2844: 2826:Fuhghettaboutit 2796:Fuhghettaboutit 2784: 2684: 2676: 2649: 2630: 2616: 2613: 2611: 2606: 2584: 2581: 2579: 2572: 2569: 2566: 2558: 2555: 2553: 2541: 2536: 2531: 2528: 2525: 2510: 2477: 2475:Happy New Year! 2466: 2460: 2456: 2438: 2432: 2419: 2386: 2373: 2367: 2362: 2355: 2341: 2335: 2308: 2288: 2283: 2276: 2252: 2249: 2247: 2243: 2229:Merry Christmas 2210: 2207: 2205: 2192: 2157:Happy Holidays! 2144: 2133: 2126: 2124: 2120: 2106:Merry Christmas 2090: 2083: 2081: 2068: 2063: 2062: 2027: 2025:Happy Holidays! 1993: 1981: 1855: 1838: 1824:Merry Christmas 1793: 1782: 1775: 1773: 1769: 1758: 1743: 1708: 1684: 1628: 1608: 1605: 1601: 1425: 1403: 1390: 1388:A beer for you! 1344: 1343: 1323:, - you are an 1301: 1292: 1275: 1272: 1270: 1255: 1253:A beer for you! 1212: 1164: 1150: 1143: 1138: 1105: 1103: 1102: 1079: 1047:bureaucrat ship 920: 914:Hope he's OK... 896: 870: 822: 797: 774: 754: 750: 726: 724: 709: 587: 525: 498: 447: 446: 445: 437: 424: 375: 374: 373: 365: 352: 315: 314: 313: 305: 292: 282: 256: 228:Quis separabit? 225: 217: 186: 90: 66: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 5297: 5295: 5285: 5284: 5263: 5262: 5257: 5246: 5243: 5240: 5239: 5218: 5217: 5212: 5201: 5198: 5197: 5196: 5195: 5194: 5175: 5151: 5148: 5147: 5146: 5097: 5094: 5072: 5069: 5068: 5067: 5066: 5065: 5064: 5063: 5062: 5061: 5060: 5059: 5031: 5030: 5029: 5028: 5027: 5026: 5025: 5024: 5010:WP:NOTFINISHED 4994: 4993: 4992: 4991: 4990: 4989: 4988: 4987: 4940: 4939: 4938: 4937: 4936: 4935: 4916: 4915: 4914: 4913: 4912: 4911: 4902: 4901: 4900: 4899: 4898: 4897: 4872: 4871: 4870: 4869: 4851: 4850: 4792: 4789: 4786: 4785: 4770: 4769: 4764: 4753: 4750: 4749: 4748: 4747: 4746: 4745: 4744: 4743: 4742: 4728: 4727: 4726: 4651:WP:NOTCENSORED 4641:Eric's comment 4601: 4568: 4565: 4548: 4545: 4544: 4543: 4542: 4541: 4540: 4539: 4538: 4537: 4536: 4535: 4534: 4533: 4431: 4430: 4378: 4375: 4374: 4373: 4342: 4339: 4336: 4335: 4317: 4306: 4303: 4287: 4284: 4276: 4275: 4274: 4273: 4272: 4254: 4253: 4233: 4232: 4227: 4226: 4222: 4221: 4189: 4188: 4187: 4186: 4185: 4184: 4183: 4182: 4181: 4180: 4179: 4178: 4177: 4176: 4175: 4174: 4160:Please. Stop. 4154: 4153: 4135: 4134: 4117: 4116: 4099: 4098: 4084: 4036:is occurring. 3972: 3963: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3941: 3938: 3937: 3936: 3935: 3934: 3863: 3860: 3859: 3858: 3857: 3856: 3855: 3854: 3853: 3852: 3851: 3850: 3849: 3848: 3704: 3701: 3698: 3697: 3681: 3680: 3675: 3673: 3662: 3659: 3658: 3657: 3656: 3655: 3595: 3592: 3591: 3590: 3589: 3588: 3521: 3518: 3517: 3516: 3494: 3491: 3490: 3489: 3488: 3487: 3486: 3485: 3404: 3401: 3400: 3397: 3385: 3382: 3381: 3380: 3348: 3345: 3344: 3343: 3308: 3305: 3304: 3303: 3302: 3301: 3251: 3248: 3247: 3246: 3203: 3200: 3170:stop attacking 3160: 3157: 3156: 3155: 3154: 3153: 3111: 3110: 3060: 3057: 3043: 3040: 3039: 3038: 3007: 3004: 3003: 3002: 3001: 3000: 2999: 2998: 2997: 2996: 2995: 2994: 2993: 2992: 2981:Martinevans123 2947:Martinevans123 2941: 2843: 2840: 2839: 2838: 2837: 2836: 2783: 2780: 2764: 2763: 2762: 2761: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2738: 2705: 2704: 2648: 2645: 2629: 2628:Happy New Year 2626: 2593: 2580: 2542: 2540: 2523: 2501: 2487: 2478: 2476: 2473: 2464: 2447: 2436: 2429: 2420: 2418: 2415: 2412: 2411: 2410: 2409: 2403: 2402: 2398: 2385: 2384:Happy New Year 2382: 2357:Happy New Year 2350: 2349: 2326: 2325: 2320: 2318: 2307: 2304: 2287: 2284: 2275: 2262: 2232: 2202: 2193: 2191: 2188: 2186: 2182: 2181: 2166: 2154: 2143: 2142:Happy holidays 2140: 2131: 2109: 2088: 2078: 2069: 2067: 2064: 2037: 2036: 2034: 2026: 2023: 2010: 2003: 2002: 1986: 1980: 1977: 1976: 1975: 1974: 1973: 1972: 1971: 1970: 1969: 1968: 1967: 1854: 1851: 1827: 1803: 1794: 1792: 1791:Happy holidays 1789: 1780: 1759:Message added 1757: 1744: 1742: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1707: 1702: 1683: 1680: 1679: 1678: 1677: 1676: 1627: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1588:Google Code-In 1586:The user is a 1550: 1549: 1548: 1516: 1515: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1510: 1509: 1424: 1421: 1418: 1417: 1400: 1389: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1361: 1360: 1306: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1291: 1288: 1285: 1284: 1265: 1254: 1251: 1250: 1249: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1159: 1133: 1132: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1076: 1075: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1023:Bureaucratship 1019: 1018: 1004: 994:Martinevans123 986: 973:TheGeneralUser 965: 964: 963: 962: 961: 960: 941:Reaper Eternal 895: 892: 891: 890: 889: 888: 864: 863: 847: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 841: 840: 817:And BTW, this 725:Message added 723: 710: 708: 705: 704: 703: 702: 701: 700: 699: 698: 697: 696: 695: 586: 585:A7 would apply 583: 582: 581: 580: 579: 578: 577: 497: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 489: 488: 458: 457: 456: 443: 441: 439: 433: 422: 386: 385: 384: 383: 371: 369: 367: 361: 350: 344:] No comment. 311: 309: 307: 301: 290: 281: 278: 277: 276: 275: 274: 216: 213: 212: 211: 185: 182: 181: 180: 179: 178: 177: 176: 175: 174: 89: 86: 65: 62: 60: 56: 55: 38: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5296: 5283: 5280: 5274: 5269: 5265: 5264: 5261: 5258: 5255: 5250: 5244: 5238: 5233: 5232: 5227: 5226: 5220: 5219: 5216: 5213: 5210: 5205: 5199: 5193: 5190: 5187: 5184: 5180: 5179: 5178: 5177: 5176: 5174: 5170: 5166: 5162: 5156: 5149: 5145: 5142: 5139: 5136: 5131: 5127: 5126: 5125: 5124: 5120: 5116: 5112: 5108: 5103: 5096:Web Developer 5095: 5093: 5092: 5089: 5084: 5078: 5070: 5058: 5054: 5050: 5046: 5041: 5040: 5039: 5038: 5037: 5036: 5035: 5034: 5033: 5032: 5023: 5019: 5015: 5011: 5006: 5002: 5001: 5000: 4999: 4998: 4997: 4996: 4995: 4986: 4983: 4980: 4977: 4973: 4969: 4965: 4964: 4963: 4959: 4955: 4950: 4946: 4945: 4944: 4943: 4942: 4941: 4934: 4930: 4926: 4922: 4921: 4920: 4919: 4918: 4917: 4908: 4907: 4906: 4905: 4904: 4903: 4896: 4893: 4890: 4887: 4883: 4878: 4877: 4876: 4875: 4874: 4873: 4868: 4864: 4860: 4855: 4854: 4853: 4852: 4848: 4845: 4842: 4839: 4835: 4831: 4824: 4819: 4818: 4817: 4816: 4812: 4808: 4801: 4790: 4784: 4780: 4776: 4772: 4771: 4768: 4765: 4762: 4757: 4751: 4741: 4737: 4733: 4729: 4725: 4722: 4719: 4716: 4712: 4707: 4703: 4698: 4697: 4696: 4692: 4688: 4684: 4680: 4675: 4674: 4673: 4670: 4667: 4664: 4660: 4656: 4652: 4647: 4642: 4637: 4633: 4632: 4631: 4627: 4623: 4618: 4617: 4616: 4613: 4610: 4607: 4602: 4600: 4597: 4594: 4591: 4586: 4585: 4584: 4583: 4579: 4575: 4566: 4564: 4563: 4560: 4557: 4546: 4532: 4528: 4524: 4519: 4514: 4510: 4509: 4508: 4505: 4502: 4499: 4495: 4491: 4490: 4489: 4485: 4481: 4476: 4471: 4470: 4469: 4466: 4463: 4460: 4455: 4454: 4453: 4449: 4445: 4440: 4435: 4434: 4433: 4432: 4429: 4428: 4425: 4422: 4419: 4413: 4409: 4404: 4400: 4399: 4398: 4397: 4393: 4389: 4385: 4376: 4372: 4369: 4366: 4363: 4359: 4358: 4357: 4355: 4352: 4348: 4340: 4334: 4330: 4326: 4322: 4318: 4315: 4311: 4310: 4304: 4302: 4301: 4297: 4293: 4286:My apology... 4285: 4280: 4271: 4267: 4263: 4258: 4257: 4256: 4255: 4252: 4248: 4244: 4240: 4235: 4234: 4229: 4228: 4224: 4223: 4220: 4217: 4214: 4211: 4207: 4203: 4199: 4195: 4191: 4190: 4173: 4169: 4165: 4161: 4158: 4157: 4156: 4155: 4152: 4148: 4144: 4139: 4138: 4137: 4136: 4133: 4129: 4125: 4121: 4120: 4119: 4118: 4115: 4111: 4107: 4103: 4102: 4101: 4100: 4097: 4093: 4089: 4085: 4083: 4080: 4079: 4075: 4063: 4062: 4061: 4057: 4053: 4049: 4048: 4047: 4043: 4039: 4035: 4031: 4027: 4023: 4019: 4018: 4017: 4013: 4009: 4005: 4001: 3997: 3996: 3995: 3994: 3990: 3986: 3981: 3977: 3970: 3959: 3956: 3953: 3950: 3939: 3932: 3929: 3925: 3920: 3916: 3911: 3906: 3905: 3904: 3900: 3896: 3892: 3888: 3887: 3886: 3885: 3881: 3877: 3873: 3872:non-redundant 3869: 3861: 3847: 3843: 3839: 3834: 3833: 3831: 3828: 3824: 3820: 3816: 3815: 3814: 3810: 3806: 3802: 3801: 3799: 3796: 3792: 3788: 3785: 3781: 3779: 3774: 3770: 3769: 3768: 3764: 3760: 3756: 3752: 3751: 3750: 3747: 3744: 3741: 3737: 3733: 3729: 3728: 3727: 3726: 3722: 3718: 3714: 3710: 3702: 3696: 3692: 3688: 3683: 3682: 3679: 3676: 3671: 3666: 3660: 3654: 3651: 3647: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3633: 3630: 3627: 3623: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3617: 3613: 3609: 3605: 3601: 3593: 3587: 3584: 3583: 3579: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3561: 3558: 3555: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3547: 3544: 3543: 3539: 3527: 3519: 3515: 3512: 3509: 3506: 3501: 3500: 3499: 3483: 3480: 3477: 3474: 3469: 3468: 3467: 3464: 3458: 3453: 3449: 3448: 3447: 3444: 3441: 3438: 3434: 3429: 3428: 3427: 3426: 3423: 3417: 3412: 3408: 3407:U.S. Route 20 3398: 3395: 3394: 3393: 3391: 3384:Advice needed 3383: 3379: 3376: 3373: 3370: 3365: 3364: 3363: 3362: 3358: 3354: 3346: 3342: 3339: 3336: 3333: 3329: 3328: 3327: 3326: 3322: 3318: 3314: 3306: 3300: 3296: 3292: 3288: 3287: 3286: 3283: 3280: 3277: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3265: 3261: 3257: 3249: 3245: 3242: 3239: 3236: 3232: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3224: 3218: 3213: 3209: 3201: 3199: 3198: 3194: 3190: 3187: 3185: 3179: 3175: 3171: 3158: 3152: 3149: 3146: 3143: 3139: 3138: 3137: 3136: 3135: 3134: 3131: 3128: 3123: 3122: 3119: 3116: 3109: 3106: 3103: 3100: 3095: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3087: 3084: 3081: 3075: 3071: 3068: 3066: 3058: 3056: 3055: 3052: 3049: 3041: 3037: 3034: 3031: 3028: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3021: 3017: 3013: 3005: 2990: 2986: 2982: 2978: 2973: 2972: 2971: 2967: 2963: 2959: 2958: 2956: 2952: 2948: 2942: 2940: 2936: 2932: 2928: 2923: 2922: 2921: 2917: 2913: 2908: 2904: 2903: 2901: 2898: 2894: 2889: 2888: 2887: 2883: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2866: 2865: 2863: 2860: 2856: 2852: 2848: 2841: 2835: 2831: 2827: 2823: 2822: 2821: 2818: 2815: 2812: 2808: 2807: 2806: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2789: 2781: 2779: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2769:Stormy Nights 2759: 2755: 2751: 2747: 2746: 2745: 2744: 2737: 2734: 2731: 2728: 2724: 2723: 2721: 2717: 2713: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2706: 2703: 2700: 2697: 2694: 2690: 2682: 2673: 2672: 2671: 2670: 2666: 2662: 2658: 2654: 2646: 2644: 2643: 2639: 2635: 2627: 2625: 2624: 2621: 2620: 2605: 2603: 2599: 2594: 2590: 2586: 2576: 2563: 2562: 2546: 2539: 2524: 2522: 2521: 2518: 2517: 2509: 2507: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2493: 2482: 2474: 2472: 2471: 2468: 2463: 2455: 2453: 2448: 2444: 2440: 2435: 2424: 2416: 2408: 2407: 2399: 2394: 2389: 2383: 2381: 2380: 2376: 2370: 2358: 2348: 2344: 2338: 2332: 2328: 2327: 2324: 2321: 2316: 2311: 2305: 2303: 2302: 2298: 2294: 2285: 2280: 2273: 2266: 2261: 2260: 2257: 2256: 2242: 2241: 2239: 2233: 2230: 2226: 2222: 2219: 2215: 2214: 2197: 2189: 2187: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2167: 2163: 2158: 2155: 2152: 2147: 2141: 2139: 2138: 2135: 2130: 2119: 2118: 2116: 2110: 2107: 2103: 2099: 2096: 2092: 2087: 2073: 2065: 2061: 2055: 2048: 2041: 2035: 2032: 2031: 2024: 2022: 2021: 2017: 2013: 2006: 2004: 2000: 1996: 1990: 1983: 1978: 1966: 1963: 1960: 1957: 1952: 1948: 1947: 1946: 1942: 1938: 1934: 1930: 1929: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1915: 1914: 1913: 1910: 1907: 1904: 1900: 1899: 1898: 1895: 1892: 1889: 1885: 1881: 1878:not a threat 1876: 1875: 1874: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1860: 1852: 1850: 1849: 1846: 1845: 1843:JianhuiMobile 1837: 1836: 1834: 1828: 1825: 1821: 1817: 1814: 1810: 1809: 1807:JianhuiMobile 1798: 1790: 1788: 1787: 1784: 1779: 1766: 1762: 1755: 1748: 1740: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1717: 1713: 1706: 1703: 1701: 1700: 1696: 1692: 1689:is hoax by -- 1688: 1681: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1663: 1659: 1658: 1657: 1654: 1651: 1648: 1644: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1637: 1633: 1625: 1617: 1614: 1611: 1604: 1597: 1593: 1589: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1580: 1577: 1574: 1569: 1568: 1567: 1563: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1544: 1541: 1538: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1529: 1526: 1523: 1518: 1517: 1508: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1491: 1490: 1487: 1484: 1481: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1471: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1456: 1455: 1454: 1451: 1448: 1445: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1434: 1430: 1423:Mass rollback 1422: 1416: 1412: 1410: 1409: 1401: 1398: 1394: 1393: 1387: 1381: 1377: 1373: 1369: 1368:great fishing 1365: 1364: 1363: 1362: 1359: 1356: 1353: 1350: 1346: 1345: 1342: 1341: 1337: 1333: 1328: 1326: 1322: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1305: 1299: 1289: 1283: 1280: 1279: 1266: 1263: 1259: 1258: 1252: 1240: 1237: 1236: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1223: 1219: 1208: 1207: 1206: 1203: 1202: 1195: 1194: 1193: 1190: 1187: 1184: 1180: 1179: 1178: 1175: 1174: 1160: 1158: 1155: 1153: 1148: 1146: 1141: 1135: 1134: 1131: 1127: 1123: 1119: 1115: 1112: 1111: 1098: 1097: 1096: 1092: 1088: 1083: 1077: 1069: 1065: 1060: 1056: 1053: 1048: 1044: 1043: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1037: 1034: 1031: 1028: 1024: 1017: 1013: 1009: 1005: 1003: 999: 995: 992:a non-word). 991: 987: 985: 982: 981: 980: 975: 967: 966: 959: 956: 952: 951: 950: 946: 942: 938: 937: 934: 931: 923: 918: 917: 916: 913: 910: 900: 893: 887: 883: 879: 874: 868: 867: 866: 865: 862: 859: 856: 853: 849: 848: 839: 835: 831: 826: 820: 816: 815: 814: 810: 806: 801: 795: 794: 792: 788: 784: 778: 773: 772: 771: 767: 763: 758: 752: 751: 747: 743: 739: 735: 730: 721: 714: 706: 694: 691: 688: 685: 681: 677: 676: 675: 671: 667: 663: 662: 661: 658: 655: 652: 648: 644: 640: 639: 638: 634: 630: 626: 624: 623: 622: 619: 616: 613: 608: 607: 606: 605: 601: 597: 593: 584: 576: 572: 568: 563: 562: 561: 557: 553: 549: 544: 543: 542: 539: 536: 533: 523: 519: 518:Help:Template 515: 514: 513: 512: 508: 504: 495: 486: 482: 478: 477: 476: 475: 472: 469: 466: 459: 453: 450: 449: 429: 426: 425: 416:. Vänligen, 415: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 401: 397: 393: 388: 387: 381: 378: 377: 357: 354: 353: 343: 341: 340: 339: 338: 335: 332: 329: 325: 324: 323: 321: 318: 317: 297: 294: 293: 279: 273: 269: 265: 260: 254: 253: 252: 249: 246: 243: 238: 237: 236: 235: 232: 230: 229: 222: 214: 210: 207: 204: 201: 197: 196: 195: 194: 191: 183: 172: 168: 164: 159: 158: 157: 153: 149: 145: 144: 143: 140: 137: 134: 130: 125: 124: 123: 119: 115: 110: 109: 108: 107: 103: 99: 95: 85: 84: 81: 77: 76: 75:brief survey. 71: 63: 61: 53: 49: 45: 44: 39: 32: 31: 23: 19: 5259: 5230: 5224: 5214: 5163: 5160: 5133:accomplish? 5115:Cya2evernote 5099: 5074: 4971: 4968:User:SineBot 4881: 4800:cite journal 4794: 4766: 4710: 4701: 4658: 4654: 4635: 4570: 4555: 4550: 4518:quid pro quo 4517: 4512: 4493: 4474: 4438: 4415: 4411: 4407: 4402: 4380: 4344: 4325:Technical 13 4289: 4278: 4077: 3973: 3964: 3918: 3871: 3865: 3706: 3677: 3645: 3624:Sure, done. 3597: 3581: 3541: 3523: 3496: 3402: 3387: 3350: 3310: 3255: 3253: 3205: 3181: 3162: 3159:January 2014 3124: 3112: 3093: 3076: 3072: 3069: 3062: 3045: 3009: 2926: 2845: 2785: 2765: 2650: 2631: 2609: 2607: 2595: 2578: 2577:Welcome the 2565: 2551: 2550: 2513: 2511: 2503: 2489: 2486: 2457: 2449: 2428: 2400: 2353: 2329:For writing 2322: 2289: 2245: 2244: 2235: 2234: 2203: 2201: 2185: 2161: 2156: 2121: 2112: 2111: 2077: 2059: 2033: 2028: 2005: 1982: 1950: 1883: 1879: 1856: 1841: 1839: 1830: 1829: 1805: 1802: 1770: 1709: 1685: 1632:Thewikiguru1 1629: 1599: 1596:TemplateData 1494: 1426: 1405: 1372:Gerda Arendt 1332:Gerda Arendt 1329: 1303: 1302: 1268: 1232: 1198: 1170: 1151: 1144: 1139: 1100: 1062:Just ignore 1046: 1022: 1020: 989: 970: 969: 930:User:Avraham 921: 904: 707:RfB question 679: 646: 588: 547: 499: 461: 430: 421: 420: 358: 349: 348: 298: 289: 288: 283: 227: 226: 218: 187: 184:The question 92:Any ideas? 91: 74: 67: 59: 47: 41: 5183:Writ Keeper 5135:Writ Keeper 5130:attribution 5082:S Philbrick 4976:Writ Keeper 4886:Writ Keeper 4838:Writ Keeper 4715:Writ Keeper 4683:WP:NOTFORUM 4663:Writ Keeper 4606:Writ Keeper 4590:Writ Keeper 4498:Writ Keeper 4459:Writ Keeper 4418:Writ Keeper 4362:Writ Keeper 4243:Floquenbeam 4210:Writ Keeper 3980:Wikihounded 3949:Writ Keeper 3740:Writ Keeper 3626:Writ Keeper 3604:WP:RESTRICT 3598:You closed 3594:ANI Closure 3554:Writ Keeper 3505:Writ Keeper 3473:Writ Keeper 3437:Writ Keeper 3369:Writ Keeper 3332:Writ Keeper 3317:Ginesfanego 3313:Writ Keeper 3276:Writ Keeper 3235:Writ Keeper 3142:Writ Keeper 3099:Writ Keeper 3027:Writ Keeper 2977:Wikipedians 2962:Newyorkbrad 2931:Newyorkbrad 2912:Floquenbeam 2878:Newyorkbrad 2876:. Regards, 2874:this thread 2851:Newyorkbrad 2811:Writ Keeper 2792:this script 2727:Writ Keeper 2693:Writ Keeper 2647:Help Please 2537:Writ Keeper 2293:Newyorkbrad 2238:subst:Xmas2 2115:subst:Xmas2 1956:Writ Keeper 1903:Writ Keeper 1888:Writ Keeper 1833:subst:Xmas2 1647:Writ Keeper 1602:Theopolisme 1598:-related). 1573:Writ Keeper 1537:Writ Keeper 1522:Writ Keeper 1480:Writ Keeper 1444:Writ Keeper 1349:Writ Keeper 1183:Writ Keeper 1027:Writ Keeper 852:Writ Keeper 684:Writ Keeper 651:Writ Keeper 612:Writ Keeper 532:Writ Keeper 465:Writ Keeper 328:Writ Keeper 280:Little crat 242:Writ Keeper 200:Writ Keeper 163:Floquenbeam 148:Floquenbeam 133:Writ Keeper 114:Floquenbeam 98:Floquenbeam 40:This is an 5075:I thought 4791:BracketBot 4711:inherently 4679:WP:NOTBLOG 3291:Epicgenius 3260:Epicgenius 2689:A good rap 2634:Epicgenius 2461:cyberpower 2433:cyberpower 2286:"Talkback" 2012:Epicgenius 1763:. You can 1499:Epicgenius 1466:Epicgenius 1464:'s edits. 1429:Epicgenius 1319:, and for 1218:Epicgenius 1136:Congrats! 1008:Epicgenius 744:. You can 5077:this edit 5071:Nice edit 4823:SimonTrew 4775:Hafspajen 4556:INeverCry 4034:full tilt 3713:this edit 3709:this note 3687:ThaddeusB 3646:Thank you 3250:Thanks... 3012:Hordaland 2870:this vote 2515:Jianhui67 2491:Jianhui67 2221:Christmas 2170:Hafspajen 2098:Christmas 1816:Christmas 1590:student ( 1458:This edit 1234:Jianhui67 1200:Jianhui67 1172:Jianhui67 1052:WJBscribe 955:Acalamari 423:bishzilla 392:Bishzilla 351:bishzilla 291:bishzilla 190:Acalamari 146:Do it. -- 4347:Bishonen 3924:Bishonen 3823:Bishonen 3791:Bishonen 3650:Armbrust 3616:Armbrust 3433:WP:CHU/U 3353:Ghmyrtle 3208:email me 3059:Question 2893:Bishonen 2855:Bishonen 2750:Mudak568 2712:Mudak568 2661:Mudak568 2653:Mudak568 2589:WikiLove 2497:WikiLove 2443:WikiLove 2368:benzband 2336:benzband 2277:You can 2225:WikiLove 2102:WikiLove 1820:WikiLove 1741:Talkback 1691:Sunuraju 1290:Precious 1091:contribs 1068:janitors 882:contribs 869:Thanks. 834:contribs 809:contribs 766:contribs 738:contribs 643:Gurdwara 641:Dude, a 268:contribs 22:Archives 20:‎ | 5268:Yunshui 5049:Si Trew 5014:Si Trew 4954:Si Trew 4925:Si Trew 4859:Si Trew 4807:Si Trew 4706:WP:SFOD 4702:article 4567:BLP/BLD 4513:fucking 4494:fucking 3919:mention 3759:Nyttend 3736:Nyttend 3730:*sigh* 3717:Nyttend 3452:Yunshui 3411:Yunshui 3178:blocked 3168:Please 2907:can see 1315:", for 1140:///Euro 43:archive 5165:Drmies 5107:script 5100:Hello 5087:(Talk) 4636:really 4341:E-mail 4206:Drmies 3940:F.Y.I. 3915:Medeis 3895:μηδείς 3876:μηδείς 3610:& 3233:Sure. 3189:Drmies 3094:during 2465:Online 2437:Online 2354:Also, 2168:From 2132:Online 2089:Online 1951:entire 1937:Sitush 1919:Sitush 1880:per se 1864:Sitush 1781:Online 1727:Drmies 1712:Drmies 1682:Leacgy 1666:Drmies 1558:Drmies 1108:jones 1055:(talk) 978:(talk) 680:before 592:WP:IAR 567:Drmies 414:pocket 396:Drmies 80:Ocaasi 4882:quite 4659:might 4655:could 4646:page. 4547:Email 4475:never 4439:never 4408:maybe 4377:Point 3786:page, 3212:EVula 2943:(TPS) 2681:Kasta 2598:subst 2567:Happy 2526:Happy 2218:Merry 2159:Hope 2127:power 2125:cyber 2095:Merry 2084:power 2082:cyber 1813:Merry 1776:power 1774:cyber 1705:Onfim 1230:Lol. 1082:Trevj 873:Trevj 825:Trevj 800:Trevj 757:Trevj 729:Trevj 552:Bbb23 503:Bbb23 259:Trevj 221:Trevj 16:< 5169:talk 5119:talk 5111:RDFa 5053:talk 5018:talk 4972:more 4958:talk 4929:talk 4863:talk 4811:talk 4779:talk 4736:talk 4691:talk 4681:and 4626:talk 4578:talk 4527:talk 4484:talk 4448:talk 4412:said 4392:talk 4351:talk 4329:talk 4321:calm 4296:talk 4266:talk 4247:talk 4202:Floq 4198:Bish 4168:talk 4147:talk 4128:talk 4110:talk 4092:talk 4067:Luke 4056:talk 4042:talk 4030:this 4026:here 4024:and 4022:here 4012:talk 3989:talk 3976:this 3928:talk 3899:talk 3891:edit 3880:talk 3842:talk 3827:talk 3809:talk 3795:talk 3763:talk 3755:this 3732:Bish 3721:talk 3691:talk 3571:Luke 3531:Luke 3357:talk 3321:talk 3311:Hi, 3295:talk 3264:talk 3217:talk 3193:talk 3130:Talk 3118:Talk 3083:Talk 3051:Talk 3016:talk 2985:talk 2966:talk 2951:talk 2935:talk 2927:that 2916:talk 2905:You 2897:talk 2882:talk 2859:talk 2830:talk 2800:talk 2773:talk 2754:talk 2716:talk 2665:talk 2657:talk 2638:talk 2582:2014 2573:Year 2532:Year 2374:talk 2342:talk 2297:talk 2174:talk 2016:talk 1941:talk 1923:talk 1884:well 1868:talk 1731:talk 1716:talk 1695:talk 1670:talk 1662:Guru 1636:talk 1609:talk 1592:Qgil 1562:talk 1554:this 1503:talk 1470:talk 1433:talk 1376:talk 1336:talk 1222:talk 1126:talk 1087:talk 1045:The 1012:talk 998:talk 945:talk 878:talk 830:talk 805:talk 762:talk 734:talk 670:talk 633:talk 600:talk 571:talk 556:talk 548:ever 507:talk 485:here 400:talk 264:talk 167:talk 152:talk 118:talk 102:talk 4970:is 4403:are 4292:BMK 4194:BMK 4143:BMK 4106:BMK 4052:BMK 4008:BMK 3985:BMK 3219:// 3215:// 2617:yya 2570:New 2559:yya 2529:New 2253:yya 2211:yya 2162:you 1495:all 1276:yya 1145:Car 1104:Ron 1080:-- 1064:Avi 871:-- 823:-- 798:-- 755:-- 727:-- 647:not 257:-- 5171:) 5121:) 5113:? 5055:) 5047:. 5020:) 4960:) 4931:) 4865:) 4849:ck 4813:) 4802:}} 4798:{{ 4781:) 4738:) 4693:) 4685:. 4643:: 4628:) 4580:) 4529:) 4486:) 4450:) 4394:) 4356:. 4349:| 4331:) 4298:) 4268:) 4249:) 4170:) 4149:) 4130:) 4112:) 4094:) 4073:94 4070:no 4058:) 4044:) 4014:) 3991:) 3926:| 3901:) 3882:) 3844:) 3832:. 3825:| 3811:) 3800:. 3793:| 3775:: 3765:) 3723:) 3693:) 3685:-- 3577:94 3574:no 3537:94 3534:no 3359:) 3323:) 3297:) 3266:) 3256:IP 3225:// 3195:) 3018:) 2987:) 2968:) 2953:) 2937:) 2918:) 2910:-- 2902:. 2895:| 2884:) 2864:. 2857:| 2832:) 2802:) 2775:) 2756:) 2722:) 2718:) 2667:) 2640:) 2614:at 2612:Pr 2608:-- 2556:at 2554:Pr 2534:, 2377:) 2360:! 2345:) 2333:. 2299:) 2250:at 2248:Pr 2208:at 2206:Pr 2176:) 2018:) 1943:) 1925:) 1870:) 1733:) 1718:) 1697:) 1672:) 1638:) 1564:) 1505:) 1472:) 1435:) 1378:) 1338:) 1330:-- 1327:! 1273:at 1271:Pr 1224:) 1152:GT 1128:) 1093:) 1089:· 1014:) 1000:) 947:) 884:) 880:· 836:) 832:· 811:) 807:· 793:. 789:, 768:) 764:· 740:) 736:· 672:) 635:) 602:) 573:) 558:) 509:) 442:R! 438:OA 402:) 370:R! 366:OA 322:. 310:R! 306:OA 270:) 266:· 215:OK 169:) 154:) 120:) 112:-- 104:) 5278:水 5275:‍ 5272:雲 5234:) 5231:☎ 5228:( 5189:♔ 5186:⚇ 5167:( 5141:♔ 5138:⚇ 5117:( 5051:( 5016:( 4982:♔ 4979:⚇ 4956:( 4927:( 4892:♔ 4889:⚇ 4861:( 4844:♔ 4841:⚇ 4825:: 4821:@ 4809:( 4777:( 4752:. 4734:( 4721:♔ 4718:⚇ 4689:( 4669:♔ 4666:⚇ 4624:( 4612:♔ 4609:⚇ 4596:♔ 4593:⚇ 4576:( 4525:( 4504:♔ 4501:⚇ 4482:( 4465:♔ 4462:⚇ 4446:( 4424:♔ 4421:⚇ 4390:( 4368:♔ 4365:⚇ 4327:( 4294:( 4264:( 4245:( 4216:♔ 4213:⚇ 4166:( 4145:( 4126:( 4108:( 4090:( 4054:( 4040:( 4010:( 3987:( 3955:♔ 3952:⚇ 3933:. 3912:) 3908:( 3897:( 3878:( 3840:( 3807:( 3761:( 3746:♔ 3743:⚇ 3719:( 3689:( 3632:♔ 3629:⚇ 3560:♔ 3557:⚇ 3511:♔ 3508:⚇ 3479:♔ 3476:⚇ 3462:水 3459:‍ 3456:雲 3443:♔ 3440:⚇ 3421:水 3418:‍ 3415:雲 3375:♔ 3372:⚇ 3355:( 3338:♔ 3335:⚇ 3319:( 3293:( 3282:♔ 3279:⚇ 3262:( 3241:♔ 3238:⚇ 3222:☯ 3191:( 3148:♔ 3145:⚇ 3105:♔ 3102:⚇ 3033:♔ 3030:⚇ 3014:( 2983:( 2964:( 2949:( 2933:( 2914:( 2880:( 2828:( 2817:♔ 2814:⚇ 2798:( 2771:( 2760:) 2752:( 2733:♔ 2730:⚇ 2714:( 2699:♔ 2696:⚇ 2685:] 2677:] 2663:( 2655:( 2636:( 2600:: 2575:! 2458:— 2430:— 2371:( 2339:( 2295:( 2274:. 2172:( 2122:— 2079:— 2014:( 1962:♔ 1959:⚇ 1939:( 1921:( 1909:♔ 1906:⚇ 1894:♔ 1891:⚇ 1866:( 1771:— 1756:. 1729:( 1714:( 1693:( 1668:( 1653:♔ 1650:⚇ 1634:( 1612:) 1606:( 1579:♔ 1576:⚇ 1560:( 1543:♔ 1540:⚇ 1528:♔ 1525:⚇ 1501:( 1486:♔ 1483:⚇ 1468:( 1450:♔ 1447:⚇ 1431:( 1374:( 1355:♔ 1352:⚇ 1334:( 1220:( 1189:♔ 1186:⚇ 1124:( 1106:h 1085:( 1033:♔ 1030:⚇ 1010:( 996:( 943:( 876:( 858:♔ 855:⚇ 828:( 803:( 779:) 775:( 760:( 732:( 722:. 690:♔ 687:⚇ 668:( 657:♔ 654:⚇ 631:( 618:♔ 615:⚇ 598:( 569:( 554:( 538:♔ 535:⚇ 505:( 471:♔ 468:⚇ 454:. 444:! 440:R 435:R 398:( 382:. 372:! 368:R 363:R 334:♔ 331:⚇ 312:! 308:R 303:R 262:( 248:♔ 245:⚇ 206:♔ 203:⚇ 165:( 150:( 139:♔ 136:⚇ 116:( 100:( 54:.

Index

User talk:Writ Keeper
Archives
archive
current talk page
The Knowledge (XXG) Library
brief survey.
Ocaasi
14:46, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2013#Header error
Floquenbeam
talk
15:44, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Floquenbeam
talk
16:06, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
this thread on BN
Writ Keeper


16:17, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Floquenbeam
talk
16:18, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Floquenbeam
talk
16:19, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Acalamari
23:11, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
Writ Keeper

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.