User talk:Wwagner - Knowledge

2210: 2149: 2088: 1886: 1657:. As discussed in that article, Knowledge is not the place to advertise a website. You added the exact same link and text to several articles, edits which had been done and reverted before, in some cases multiple times, to the very same set of articles. That's a strong indication that this site isn't an appropriate external link. A notice was placed on your user talk page that those earlier edits were also considered spam. Knowledge is 3351: 3297: 3241: 3185: 3074: 3018: 2962: 2906: 2737: 2677: 2617: 2856: 2800: 2271: 2459: 3479: 3409: 1854:

userbox. On the RfA, I put "I'm sure if it was a bad idea for an admin to have this userbox on his page, it would be removed; since it's not, anyone is free to have it, and in no way should a userbox affect one's contributions towards Knowledge. If you look through The Haunted Angel's contributions, you will see that nowhere does this userbox affect anything." Thanks, —

3368:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3316:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3260:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3204:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3093:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 3037:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2981:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2925:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2756:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2696:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 2636:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 1456:(Deindenting for readability) The refs look awesome! I think this is the most heavily referenced article I've ever seen on the wiki. W00t! I took a night off the referencing blowout, but I'll get back at it tomorrow. I guess we'll be onto the fictitious folks now, which might be a little more challenging. 1328:

I wholeheartedly agree with your citation policy - one good one, and that's probably enough. And since this reflist is going to be ridiculously long, having it collapsible might be helpful. I'll toy with that a bit. I don't think there's a template, but I figured out the markup for the collapsible

536:

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work.

262:

reasons, and I will make no apology for it. I made no secret that I thought the placement of the screenshot image in the Wipeout article made the article look poor, and also made the lead paragraph more difficult to see, and that I would try to find a better placement for the image. You, of course,

1842:

get the joke, is using the userbox. I welcome people to use my userboxes, and a few people do use them, which is just fine with me. If the swastika was a problem for any of them, then surely they would not have used it. So, the short answer to your question: thank you for your concern, but no, I

1237:

or the like). Some of the blurbs were just way too long, and IMO, unnecessarily duplicated much of what was already in the subject's article. I've also added all the birth and death dates that any of the wiki articles had. I tried to strip the fictional entries down a lot too, though I'm not 100%

997:

Thanks for the tip. I was able to find one image s/he uploaded that was almost assuredly copyright violation (CV), which I nom'ed for deletion, but couldn't find any of the others on the Bayport FD site. Having said that, most of them have the same style and font, and are probably CV as well; I'll

252:

article for two reasons: because the information I added was redundant and was discussed in much more complete detail in the linked-to article (of which I was not aware at the time I added the data), and also because the formatting of the information I added was poor. I noted both those reasons in

218:

I never said the pages were mine, but I did make clear that I didn't like some of your edits. If you make more edits to any of the pages, I'm not going to revert them unless they don't look right. You removed track information from one page and linked to an unnecessarily large page, when the track

1332:

We can certainly work mainly on my copy. If you'd like to include what the transperson's "type" is, feel free to do so. For some of them, the distinctions could be a little hazy, or could change at any time, which is one reason I kinda avoided including that kind of description. And another more

1853:

I do agree with you, even though it may not have seemed so at first. I just wish to see the amount of controversy on Knowledge to a minimum. I find it rather annoying also that a user who will most probably pass his request for adminship is being doubted on his skills in the admin area due to one

1695:

They've been there, is pretty much why they're still there. Some of them almost assuredly don't belong, but inertia is keeping them there. In my experience, a lot of editors tend to focus on the recent changes to an article, and don't worry much about the stuff that's been there for a while. A

750:

As far as raster formats go, JPEG should be used only for photographs, paintings, and so on; PNG should be used for maps, flags, charts, diagrams, line drawings, screenshots of text, and other images that contain large blocks of a few solid colors; and GIF should be used only for animations. See

1343:

want to get away from being known as trans, or that they were ever anything other than what they are now. I'm not sure that a public person can really live stealth like that, especially if they were notable before their transition as well, but I suppose it's their prerogative to try. It's not

1351:

Once we finish up with the real people, you're going to have to take the lead on the fictitious folks section. I made some changes and condensed it, but it seems awfully perfunctory now. There's surely a happy medium between too short and too long for the entries, but... <big shrug:

1792:

is such that nobody would go out of their way to declare themselves any kind of nazi, and yet we grammar nazis do. I copied this box from another user's example, because I thought it was funny. In fact, there are several other users who have similar boxes of their own:

1676:

There have been any number of similar other sites which have been externally linked in various trans-focused articles; many of the editors who watch those articles frown on links like those, especially when added en masse to several of the trans-related articles. —

219:

information originally on the page would have more than sufficed. I'm sorry if you took offence to any of this, it was not my intention. But be aware that if I don't like something, I always make it clear. I'll try to appear less ruthless in future.

1642:

Hiya - I see you undid my external link. Why is this classed as a 'link spam' unlike the other links? Tranny International is a valuable resource, non-commercial, supports the TG community, sponsors events link Sparkle in the UK - what is the issue?

1623:

Glad I could help. Those tables can be a little muddy when you're way down in the middle of one; it took me several tries to get my tweaks right. The wikitable markup is a whole lot easier to deal with, though, so nice work on the reformat. —

2882:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

2826:

647:

It's not identical, as I couldn't be bothered trying to get the same post processing. But it's close enough. If you want me to edit it to look more like the other one tell me, and I'll see what I can do. Anyway sorry again for your trouble.

1747:; I feel if you used a different image, it would be more widely used, and less controversial, as it is a userbox which I would expect to be very widely used, but when I saw what linked to it, I was susprised, finding only 5 users use it 27:

talk page, respond to it there, and I'll keep an eye out for it. It's darn hard to follow a conversation that's in two places; it's like listening to one side of a phone conversation, then hearing the other side much later. Thanks for

682:

clearly specifies that the two images must be in the same image file format, so for example a JPEG that is redundant to an SVG cannot be speedily deleted under CSD I1, and the {{isd}} tag is inapplicable. I would suggest following the

3520:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.

3450:

1374:

Hmmm.... Okay - I think you've convinced me on the "typifying" people issue - but where they are particularly famous for being trans, I think it should stay, as you suggested earlier. People can always have a look at the article

1539:

is probably a better place to discuss the changes than here. Please give some feedback there on my latest edit; it was a good faith edit, but I think we've got some conflicts in our respective visions for this article. —

1220:

as well. I rearranged all the real-person entries together, and all the fictional-person entries together, and pared down most of the descriptions of each person to the essential things for which that person is known

738:

In general, SVG is preferred over any raster format (PNG, JPEG, GIF, etc.), because SVGs can be cleanly scaled to any size. But for this reason there is a dispute about whether SVG versions of logos can be considered

2830:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

1459:

One concern I have is the additions you've done to the peoples' descriptions; one of the things I was trying to do is pare the descriptions down to a minimal level. I've got a few reasons for what I was attempting.

1285:

reference (reasonable source, preferrably the actual person talking about their status) in the list, and then cleaning up th article as I go. If there's more than one good reference, then they can go on the actual

2886:

809:

Thanks Bkell, that's some very helpful info! And having looked at your user page, I agree with your statements that Image: space is a chaotic mess. I'll see if I can help you tame that chaos a little bit. :) —

3143:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2430:. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Knowledge policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted. 2879: 1513:

articles, for example, all say in the navbox, "(all albums listed have articles in Knowledge)". That doesn't seem like too outlandish a policy to apply to ALL the lists on the wiki, including this one.

1478:

Having some lengthy entries encourages editors who couldn't be bothered, to skip writing a proper article on the subject, and just plonk the information into the list instead. Yes, I know this doesn't

921:

Thank you for the friendly heads up about my images. I appreciate it. Also, if anything ever arises, feel free to constructively edit my pages. I do not mind as long as it was good faith. Thanks again!

1243:

I've been adding cites for the past couple days - I'm trying to focus on either interviews in which the subject talks about their transness, or bios which come out and say "this person is trans

1475:

Specific highlights change, and having to update the highlights in two places rather than just one (the subject's article) seems wasteful, and a way to introduce error through inattention.

2056:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

2009:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

1962:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

1091:

nonsense that a lot of people add. The contributions to a lot of video game articles seem to be especially bad in that respect. Of course I just added an unsourced bit of trivia to the

2400: 1584:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any 2303:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 2242:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 2181:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 2120:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1918:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1112:

it now contains what I nearly replied here. No sweat about the monkey, BTW, I still need to double check for it some time. (Remember, it's supposedly not there in time trials).--

2579: 2299:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2238:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2177:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2116:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1914:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1580:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1259:

publications. Here's a question for you: do you think we need more than one source per entry? The more the merrier? I've been doing one per entry, just to get something

204:

A watered-down version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much.

743:. There's a disagreement over what "low-resolution" means when applied to SVGs, and it is believed that logos should be low-resolution images to qualify for fair use. See 657:

W00t! That's awesome! I really appreciate your efforts, that image will be a perfect replacement for the zoomy one. Thanks a million! — Wwagner 14:12, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

2823: 849:

To my eye, those images are close enough as to be identical. There's almost assuredly a political difference of which I'm not aware, but visually they're the same. —

1686:

Thanks for the information - I've read those articles (you link above), but I'm now more confused that before - the criteria for the existing links is what then?

3498: 3494: 3428: 3424: 1135:

had listed, in practice mode (which I guess is what people mean when they say "time trials"), and sure enough, the monkey is there. Looks like a blob of, uh,

2292:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

2231:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

2170:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

2109:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

1907:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

2288:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 2227:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 2166:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 2105:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1903:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1825:

has taken the nazi userbox, including swastika, in another direction, and it's meant to be funny as well. I'd hazard that the subject of Boddah's userbox,

1569:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 157:

It's also considered good form to put this notice at the top of that article's talk page if the person is a contributor: {{Notable Wikipedian|Jokestress}}

1139:

sitting on the branch, but it's there alright, just before the second corner after the first tunnel. Now they just need to make the monkey move around in

573:

If you have any contributions to, er, contribute, to these articles, I want you to make them; assuming I'd be the person stopping you from doing that. --

2048:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at 2001:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at 1954:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at 1573:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see

2868: 2812: 2577:, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at 1381:

As to fictional/etc., I'll have a think. I'm about to start putting some of my references into yours, and I'll start down at "Z" and work my way up.

521: 2377: 684: 81: 1509:

In response to your comment above, I am concentrating on non-redlinks, which we should probably try to enforce in the main article as well. The

1754:

in most places, and the swastika does not stand for correct grammar use, but instead, terrible things. Would you consider changing it at all? —

3468: 3398: 3380: 3328: 3272: 3216: 3105: 3049: 2993: 2937: 2768: 2708: 2648: 2538: 2308: 2247: 2186: 2125: 2060: 2053: 2013: 2006: 1966: 1959: 1923: 1589: 679: 65: 1018:"inflamed" - apparently the former is actually the right spelling, in that piece. I've put it back. Poets, makin' up words, go figure. :) — 258:

As for your complaint that I am always "changing the smallest things", yes, I often make small, incremental changes, and some of them are for

3505:, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under 3435:, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under 1704:

about the things the editor wanted to remove. If you want to suggest removal of some things, by all means post on the talk page about it. —

1292:

Is there an alternative {{reflist}} template? Just wondering if we can have it collapsed unless someone particularly looks at the references.

752: 3168: 2052:

carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at

2005:

carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at

1958:

carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at

1263:, and to keep the cite list from getting too long. We can always use the sources we find to improve the article of that subject as well. 3502: 3432: 2584: 2438: 2064: 2017: 1970: 1423:, so if you'd like to put people there that you find are in fact intersexed, that would be great. Intersex is apparently not covered by 933: 1521:

in your latest comment on the main article's talk page. Things don't match up yet, and for me to claim anything specific now would be

41:

to Knowledge! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

3490: 3420: 2368: 1424: 1289:

Should we work on yours primarily? I figure, keep all the effort in one place. I'll put a watch on it. BTW, I like the cleaner layout.

1194: 508: 412: 402: 285: 85: 2276: 1506:

Now if you think I'm crazy or misguided, please tell me. The short of it is that I just think it makes a big mess of the article.

915: 1268:

Working together, we can probably knock this out in no time at all. You're more than welcome to edit my copy too, if you like. —

2863: 2847: 2059:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

2012:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

1965:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

885:

I hope I didn't get one of those wrong on your world guide book page, Justin. I'm just working from images which are tagged as

3164: 2542: 690: 516: 308:

Considering how many edits I've done that are summed up by "italicized album titles," and considering I did a mojor rewrite on

3308: 2628: 2573: 2215: 1950: 1296: 631:

Sure no problems, it was the artist in me! I'll upload an edit as soon as I dig up the original. Thanks for your patience, --

146: 775:

Okay, there's this tag that I always forget about, which is probably better than {{subst:orfud}} for these redundant logos:

84:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out

3447: 3416: 3402: 3029: 1613:. I hadn't planned on leaving it in that state, but the WP servers became unusably slow, so I had to leave it temporarily. 687:

for such images. Alternatively, fair-use images (such as logos) that are no longer used in any articles can be tagged with

3085: 2973: 2385: 2300: 2239: 2178: 2117: 1915: 1748: 1581: 1557: 1494:, for an example), which contain the subject's nationality, and one or maybe two things for which the subject is notable, 787:. This tag has the same meaning as {{subst:orfud}}, but it also says that the image has been replaced by a better image. — 2344: 2917: 1251:

statements about the subject, and some have just a bunch of blog entries about or by the subject, which I'm treating as

714:

OK, I wasn't 100% sure I was doing that right in the first place; I guess I wasn't. I'll do as you ask with the others.

644: 377: 50: 38: 3155:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2511: 3364:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3312:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3256:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3200:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3160: 3089:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 3033:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2977:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2921:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2752:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2692:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2688: 2632:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2596: 2530: 2470: 2448: 2093: 1997: 1561:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1295:

I think it is important to put down what type of "transgender" the person is - If only because I'd like to make a sub-

873: 235: 1891: 894: 890: 3196: 2352: 2335: 2327: 722: 718: 3369: 3317: 3261: 3252: 3205: 3094: 3038: 2982: 2926: 2757: 2748: 2697: 2637: 2534: 2293: 2232: 2171: 2154: 2110: 2049: 2044: 2002: 1955: 1908: 1536: 1187: 2466: 2452: 2872: 2816: 1061: 198: 70: 1299:. Would also help other lists (not that I nessicarily like the) such as list of transsexual actors and the like. 2479: 2280:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2219:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2158:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2097:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 2072: 2025: 1978: 1895:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 860: 556: 293:

Regardless, I will no longer be wasting my time with you, or the Wipeout articles. Again, good luck to you. —

1472:

life story, which some of the entries did. It's just a list, and each subject's article is a mere click away.

959: 886: 1838:

It's not my fault if someone doesn't get the joke. It's also not my fault that somebody else, who obviously

263:

reverted my change with no edit summary, and only the quoted complaint on the talk page (unsigned, as usual).

244:

So now linking to another article, large or otherwise, is a bad thing? I removed the information I added to

3517: 3486: 3472: 2600: 2422: 1420: 973: 928: 877: 842: 119: 2399:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at 3360: 1079: 417: 45: 1014: 151: 1687: 1644: 1217: 1044: 347: 77: 1737:

Hey Wwagner. I just noticed someone raised concern about someone using your userbox on their page on a

1673:. In short, while it's fine that you want to promote the website, Knowledge is not the place to do it. 699:, which makes them eligible for deletion in seven days. Please let me know if you have any questions. — 2807: 2791: 2778: 2718: 2658: 744: 671: 545: 245: 223: 3156: 2546: 2522: 2499: 2404: 2068: 2021: 1974: 1230: 1165: 980: 472: 249: 1661:. I also recall that you had created an article about the site in question, which has since been 503: 2889: 1806: 1654: 1574: 923: 740: 100: 60: 1818: 1487:

is more my guiding principle, and is borne out by some of the stuff we've seen in that article.

839: 136: 3132: 3123: 3113: 3057: 3001: 2945: 2556: 2507: 1814: 1256: 988: 983:

regarding the Bayport Fire Department. All of the images on the bottom of that page come from

778: 467: 94:

on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

717:

Here's one question: is there any general Wiki-wide file format preference? I noticed that

3152: 3136: 2836: 2285: 2224: 2209: 2163: 2148: 2102: 2087: 1900: 1885: 1867: 1767: 1701: 392: 362: 357: 3151:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3388: 3336: 3280: 3224: 2772: 2712: 2652: 2592: 2434: 2316: 2255: 2194: 2133: 1931: 1802: 1614: 1522: 1484: 1170: 1114: 1109: 1049: 958:

OK, gotcha; figured it was something like that. Seeing that stuff just sitting around in

869: 792: 760: 704: 598:

Don't have anything to add to those articles just now. I'll keep them in mind, though. —

560: 326: 231: 161: 141: 1047:

knowledge first-hand? Or are you just very good at learning about things from sources?--

1750:, and realised it must be due to the image which is being used there. The swastika is a 183: 3148: 3140: 2427: 2289: 2228: 2167: 2106: 1904: 1810: 1570: 1518: 1510: 1499: 1084: 1073: 1067: 694: 549: 189: 179: 1490:

I was using the lists of birthdates and deathdates in each day's article (take today,

1247:". Some people, I just can't find much on, and some I can't find articles which have 1216:

Hi Lauren! You've got a good start going; I've done quite a bit of work on it in my

3506: 3436: 3144: 2488: 1826: 1794: 1738: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1480: 1433: 1407: 1389: 1308: 1203: 1088: 1029: 987:. I recommend that at your convenience you delete the photos on that page. Thanks! -- 490: 95: 55: 2458: 3365: 3313: 3257: 3201: 3109: 3090: 3053: 3034: 2997: 2978: 2941: 2922: 2753: 2693: 2633: 2552: 2281: 2220: 2159: 2098: 1896: 1844: 1782: 1705: 1678: 1625: 1610: 1602: 1562: 1541: 1526: 1354: 1269: 1144: 1096: 1019: 999: 963: 898: 850: 811: 726: 675: 649: 632: 599: 586:

Could you reply to this message please, at least so that I know you've read it? --

462: 372: 313: 309: 294: 2270: 1401:

WOOOT !!! 100 references! I'm done for tonight. Will keep going tommorrow, maybe.

893:

was tagged, so in the course of replacing it, I also found the SVG which replaced

122:

However, I can point you to sources for filling out the bio or adding references.

2487:

While all contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be

948:

This isn't delt with through CSD since it floods the catigory and isn't critical.

2832: 1855: 1822: 1798: 1755: 1724: 1697: 1566: 1234: 485: 480: 449: 444: 432: 422: 205: 2568:

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Soul Whirling Somewhere albums

1028:

Tsk, bloody poets! :) Thanks for the heads up, I've made a note of it. Cheers,

23:, and not on your talk page. If you're responding to something I've posted on 3384: 3332: 3276: 3220: 2588: 2312: 2251: 2190: 2129: 1927: 1696:

short while ago, an editor wanted to do some cleanup on the external links in

1593: 865: 788: 756: 700: 610: 589: 576: 427: 382: 367: 227: 2517:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

949: 498: 454: 387: 352: 259: 725:, but in most other cases, the .svg image seem to be the preferred one. — 126: 3523: 3453: 1751: 1744: 397: 342: 2265:

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sourcedirect exorcisethedemons cover.jpg)

329:

predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

1491: 914: 131: 984: 312:, it amuses me that I missed those titles. Thanks for fixing it. :-) - 284:

in the space of 7 lines; it's overlinking, plain and simple. See the

115:

Thanks for the message on my talk page and for putting that entry up!

3512:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may

3442:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may

1498:, as my guide. Simple and to-the-point. I'm a big proponent of the 1087:

statements in Knowledge articles lately, just because of some of the

3532: 3462: 3392: 3340: 3284: 3228: 3172: 3117: 3061: 3005: 2949: 2893: 2840: 2784: 2724: 2664: 2604: 2562: 2442: 2410: 2320: 2259: 2198: 2137: 2076: 2029: 1982: 1935: 1874: 1847: 1821:, and those don't include the four other users who use my userbox. 1774: 1727: 1708: 1690: 1681: 1647: 1628: 1617: 1596: 1544: 1529: 1440: 1414: 1396: 1357: 1315: 1272: 1255:

reliable sources. You've found some good sources, especially those

1210: 1173: 1147: 1117: 1099: 1052: 1032: 1022: 1002: 991: 966: 952: 938: 901: 880: 853: 814: 796: 764: 729: 708: 652: 635: 614: 602: 593: 580: 563: 555:

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on

316: 297: 208: 192: 164: 105: 1193:

Hihi - Stareted nutting this out a bit and adding citations at my

3139:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

2880:

Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Rest in Peace: The Final Concert

537:

Your contributions make Knowledge better -- thanks for helping.

268:

Another edit you reverted with no comment (the changes I made to

1788: 526: 407: 3290:

Orphaned non-free image File:Synaesthesia desideratum cover.jpg

1944:

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DL12 Dragons of Faith.jpg

1551:

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Insoc_whatsonyourmind_cover.jpg)

2038:

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DL7 Dragons of Light.jpg

175: 118:

You asked: is it considered bad form to edit one's own entry?

3011:

Orphaned non-free image File:Will pearlofgreatprice cover.jpg

3477: 3407: 3349: 3295: 3239: 3183: 3072: 3016: 2960: 2904: 2735: 2675: 2615: 2457: 1991:

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:DL6 Dragons of Ice.jpg

1378:

BTW, I am assuming we're leaving out redlinks at the moment?

670:

Hello, Wwagner. I notice you've been tagging images such as

1723:

Thanks for your message on my Talk; response posted there.

2899:

Orphaned non-free image File:Fsol papuanewguinea cover.jpg

1880:

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Bancodegaia maya cover.jpg)

979:

Wwagner, I noticed you deleted several images uploaded by

678:}} because they are redundant to an SVG version. However, 2204:

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DL12 Dragons of Faith.jpg)

2143:

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DL7 Dragons of Light.jpg)

2861:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

2805:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

2393: 2389: 2381: 2373: 2360: 2356: 2348: 2340: 1741: 1700:, and a few of the people who watch that article had a 1238:

sure that those are really working the way I have them.

835: 832: 559:. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- 269: 3327: