User talk:XIIIfromTOKYO

3761:. Don't talk about it when the alleged information is still in the history, as that just draws attention to it. This is what I did, I removed the alleged information of concern and emailed oversight and they suppressed the history so it's not possible to find it anymore. It's also normally best not to comment or imply whether the information is true. I have also warned the editor concerned against OUTING. Note to avoid drawing attention to it, I waited until the suppression had happened before talking about it, other than an edit summary which I felt was necessary given how long the information had been there and that it was on another editor's talk page a silent removal risked just drawing more attention if it lead to a dispute before the edits could be suppressed. 2752:

something that is helpful in identifying sockpuppetry. Non-rare ones are not unless a specific combination of them is likely to be very rare. I think you sort of know this, but I'm not sure you followed this to the next conclusion. In particular, in that SPI you keep talking about, you ask about usage of "bizarrely". Once someone mentions it's common for at least some native speakers, and indeed I'm fairly sure I've used it more than once in Knowledge discussions myself and I know almost no French, you realise it isn't useful as evidence.

2809: 2764:

frustrating to deal with socks and as I said, ultimately you're free to believe whatever you want. But one a case has been closed with no finding of sockpuppetry, you have to let it go on Knowledge. If new evidence is posted, a block may happen in the future. This doesn't mean a mistake was made with the earlier case, if the evidence isn't strong enough then it isn't strong enough. (I'm not denying that mistakes can happen, simply suggesting that a lot of the time, it wasn't a mistake but acting on the evidence presented at the time.)

3173:. He hasn't provided provided any link, even when I ask for it. "calling the Duhamel story "pedophile conspiracies"". Delfield is clearly stating that I'm denying the pedophyle aspect of the Duhamel Affair, that is to say, making the apology for pedophilia. "hurtful and disrespectful for the many victims of pedophilia" And now I'm someone who hurts victims. What's the next step ? I'm an holocaust denier and I eat kitten ? That's clearly an insult. How can you possibly support that kind of beheaviour ? 1869:, a topic ban covers all pages (not only articles) broadly related to the topic, as well as the parts of other pages that are related to the topic". Why are you surprised of my question, if you agree that any edit to a part of that list (category) could be problematic. And thank you again for your "your extremely poor grasp of even elementary English", as that kind of beheaviour clearly underlines why admins on en.wikipedia were that slow to deal wiht the issue. 2957: 1316: 534: 892:, but not very successfully, because most of the citations being used are French sources, and I have no idea what standing they have. In some cases, I have referred the parties to take it to the French Knowledge and get consensus there. But, on the whole, it seems to me that it would be best if we erase everything in these articles here and copy the content from French Knowledge (suitably translated). Would that be appropriate? -- 2714: 2196: 1480: 420: 3829: 2682: 2654: 2552: 2514: 2442: 2366: 353: 2830: 80: 1848:, and I think that I have made that quite plain, and that appropriate action has been taken. The user concerned has only been active on two occasions. If you have further concerns about their activity, feel free to raise it on my talk page - or through the appropriate channels if you think yourself competent to do this, but I doubt that competence very much and again preach caution. 1735:, you are hereby topic-banned from making direct edits to articles on French academic institutions, due to your lack of facility with the English language and with the policies of English Knowledge. Furthermore, you are cautioned against comments addressing the motive or character of other conversants. Any further comments of this type on your part may lead to an immediate block. 1138: 3652: 1516:. Before I propose any sanctions against you, I'll give you the chance to withdraw or strike out your recent ANI edit, and to state for the record that you are not taking any legal action against Launebee or asserting he is engaged in a conspiracy. You should also withdraw your suggestion that he is violating the national laws of any country. On September 15 you 3280:. Some of them have even been totally of partially translated by other contributors on en.wiki. I know for a fact that my French grammar is more often than not, not on par. That's why, because I know that this aspect can (and will) be deficiente that I ask other contributors to check it. So earlier this month, once I have finished to add 200'000+ bytes to the 3210:"The moral rights include the right of attribution, the right to have a work published anonymously or pseudonymously, and the right to the integrity of the work. The preserving of the integrity of the work allows the author to object to alteration, distortion, or mutilation of the work that is "prejudicial to the author's honor or reputation"" 3326:

If the other editor is really a sock as you allege they may very well "win" by default. Maybe someone else like the editor who opened that SPI will deal with any alleged problematic behaviour, maybe not. I don't understand why you effectively keep asking to be blocked rather than sticking around and deal with this alleged problematic editor.

2760:

earlier socks, this new editor uses some grammar/wording which yes is common for speakers of language X so may not be that unusual. Except they also use French grammar/wording just like the earlier socks and this grammar/wording isn't expected for speakers language X. So we now have two language quirks which taken together may seem unusual.

2768:

sometimes admins including those who review SPIs feel the same i.e. I strongly suspect A is a sock of B, but I don't feel the evidence is strong enough for me to block. Note that AFAICT, given the length of time it's unlikely there was ever any technical evidence available, so a case could only ever have been on behavioural evidence alone.

3414:

You see where it's headed ? There is an asymetry in the situation. To understand the big picture, you need to be able to understand French, and be aware of some aspects of college rivalties in France. An other contributor has understood that, and is checking the references to show the mistakes, and there are a lot of them

3325:

you still seem to be refusing to accept that the SPI was reviewed and rejected. The main problem is not that we're understaffed but that it was a poor SPI. If you continue to publicly reject that the SPI failed because of insufficient evidence, you're likely to be subject to longer and longer blocks.

3167:

who begin to have the courage to speak about it France, thanks to the testimony about the REAL victim of Duhamel, and who could read such comments online. Such a statement should not be taken lightly and, I am now in favor in a (permanent) block. It is an extremely serious matter and this only should

2771:

Sometimes eventually sufficient evidence emerges and they are blocked. Sometimes an editor leaves before any block happens or an indef block happens for reasons besides sockpuppetry and the editor never successfully appeals, so we never know if we're right. Sometimes we're just wrong and come to this

2751:

I've opened or been involved in very few SPIs so maybe this is useless as I don't know what I'm talking about. But I don't think so as I think my experience at noticeboards and general is sufficient to spot some flaws in evidence. Rare behavioural or English usage quirks shared between sockpuppets is

3860:

One bit of advice that I forgot to mention. If you go to your "preferences" tab, then "notifications", then "muted users", you can revoke XIIIfromTOKYO's ability to ping you, cause a notification by linking to your username, or otherwise show up in your alerts. Very useful feature in situations like

3752:

It's clear my attempts to help haven't been successful so I won't comment further except on one point. If you have concerns another editor has disclosed alleged personal information about yourself or any other editor, when this alleged information has not been voluntarily disclosed on Knowledge, you

3413:

And for Guy Macon, I also have a story. "There once was a group of British tourists who took the ferry boat to France. They took their cars and started to drive on the wrong way on the freeway. They couldn't understand the traffic signs, and were more numerous, so they thought that they were right".

3373:

There once was a drunk driver who was driving the wrong way on the freeway. Upon hearing on the radio (over the honking horns) that there was a drunk driver who was driving the wrong way on the freeway, he peered through his windshield, noticed all of the headlights heading toward him, and exclaimed

2780:

believe any of your other evidence is any more compelling or correct? There seems to be a good chance it's all questionable. When I read further and found you'd already been told to stop referring to the SPI as demonstrating sockpuppetry back in an earlier ANI thread, my opinion dropped even lower.

2763:

Also just to add to what I said at ANI, for good reason, we require sufficient evidence before we block an editor for sockpuppetry. While you may believe there is sufficient evidence, those who've reviewed what was posted found there wasn't. It's hardly uncommon that this happens. I understand it's

2759:

The only time I can see this being useful is if there's also evidence of some language usage that is rare among either English or French speakers, but was common for the sockpuppet and is common among speakers of some other language/s. In that case, I could see an argument being made that just like

2756:

French and in part because of that using French-style English grammar and wording is not unexpected. In other words, maybe the editor concerned does so, but them doing so so isn't good evidence of sockpuppetry since there's a good chance an innocent editor would also do so given the circumstances.

2111:

You don't intend to investigate about what happened on FR.Knowledge, and you just hope that "Others will keep an eye on ". The issue has been lasting for two years because "others" have decided to do nothing. So let's try your way. Again. And hope that this time, for some reason, the result will be

1826:

I am not at all surprised that the issues were more easily handled on French Knowledge than here. The main complication here has been that the warring editors do not speak English. There was no such problem at French Knowledge (and even if there had been they deal with such problems far better than

792:

It has been lasting for a year and a half, and I must confess that I'm not very familiar the EN.wikipedia bureacracy. I have already mention the issu on the talk page of bith article, I can give you the contact of the FR admin who had to deal with the issu, but don't expect me to waste again a year

3153:

The title of the section (that I choose) is "Possible falsification of conversation (verification needed)" (my words). I have the conviction that the sitution that I have described is accurate, and links have been systematicaly provided. You have the right to disagree with my not opinion, but that

2779:

Instead I found a case which had already closed in October with the closing statement suggesting the evidence wasn't sufficient. So now my thoughts were now fairly different. I was thinking, wait a minute, if that's what you think is a compelling case which just needs admin attention, why should I

2767:

Remember also, it's perfectly possible to believe editor A is a sock of editor B, while also accepting there isn't sufficient evidence so we just have to let it be for now, not even opening a case if you feel there isn't sufficient evidence. I've definitely done that at times. I'm fairly sure that

2787:

I'd add even if you're right and if someone looks again carefully at the SPI, they'd block for sockpuppetry, the chances this will happen now after all this time are from my experience very low. So no matter if you're right there's still no point bringing it. You can continue to be annoyed if you

3176:

An SPI was filled by an other contributor, and I backed the claim. en.Wiki is understaffed, that's your problem, not mine. You have a 200 edit SPA on your hands, with an incredibly fast learning curve, and a strong taste for controversial articles. If it doesn't trigger a few read light, nothing

2783:

You may very well be very experienced and know a lot about Knowledge. Unfortunately what I saw is the opposite of this. I saw someone who doesn't seem to understand the basics of how things work around here, and seem unable to understand or accept what they've been told. This could very well be

2775:

By not accepting the outcome of that SPI and continuing to insist there is compelling evidence of sockpuppetry you're damaging your credibility and making it more difficult to deal with possibly legitimate concerns you may have unrelated to sockpuppetry. When I checked our your link, my initial

2755:

However you're still interested in the possible use of "French-style English-grammar and wording". To my mind, this is not very useful at all. Unless the editor has denied being French, and I never saw any indication they did so, someone mostly interested in French institutions being themselves

1033:

Allegations have also been made that the other editor couldn't do this on French Knowledge and that is why he/she is targeting the English Knowledge. It is easy enough for us to state that contentious material based on French sources should be taken to the French Knowledge first and we can only

2159:

No, but others will keep an eye on Launebee. And on you. None of us wanted to topic ban either of you. None of us wanted to block you. None of us want you indeffed. We become volunteer admins to help build the encyclopedia, and it breaks our hearts to have to curtail the activities of valuable

3366:

Sorry, I don't have any examples of me violating Knowledge's policies or guidelines (as you have repeatedly done and refused to admit to), because I don't as a rule violate Knowledge's policies or guidelines (evidence: fifteen years and 55,000 edits without a single block, topic ban, or other

1431:

talkpage ( a rival school) where Launebee is causing the same issues (clearly trying to made the page locked on his/her version, tempaltes removals...). That contributor has been stopped on the French Wikipédia, so it would be nice an admin could start to take care of the issue here also.

2378:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

983:. The content that is being proposed and contested involves knowing how frequently certain issues are being expressed in French sources and even French cultural knowledge that we don't necessarily have on English Knowledge. Here, for example, is a sentence proposed by the other editor: 1385:

just now on 15 September (after my warning) is similar to one of your reverts from 13 September, so you are paying no attention to my warning to wait for consensus. (Templates need consensus like any other article content). Your reference to 'criminal' behavior above sounds to me like

1876:, and you "doubt very much". Still you aknowledge the problem, and explain that you know how to take care of it. Then I have a good news for you. That's also your problem now. Again, your beheaviour clearly underlines why admins on en.wikipedia were that slow to deal wiht the issue. 2454:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2880:

article no longer follows these rules, and it's turning into a big mess about "elite" organized pedophilic orgies. A 200 edits contributor with an insanely fast learning curve has started a handfull of ANI against me, and some rules might have been broken in the processs, including

3547:– If you're talking about the inappropriate article content then no, it took me about 2 minutes. However, the "core problem" here isn't the content problem; it's your behavior, which also took me about 2 minutes to understand. Unfortunately it seems to be taking you a lot longer. 2137:, which I invited you to explain and note that you have not done so, and I suggest we drop that now as another bitter and pointless attack). If you continue you will inevitably be blocked indefinitely, in my opinion. It is only a matter of time. I am trying to avoid that. 3132:

Here's one: "Delfield made the choice to make a new forgery, and commit a copyright infringement." "You are now accusing me to make an apologia for pedophilia" is another. And of course this, "There is a strong case against Delfield for a long time abuse of sockpuppet".

1268:

rule on September 13 on this article. (Four reverts in 24 hours are a violation). There may still be time for you to avoid a block if you will promise to make no more reverts on this article until a consensus in your favor is reached on the article talk page. Thank you,

1030:, which is regarded as a world-leading institution in English sources. The article on French Knowledge mentions none of this. I would contend that this kind of stuff should be taken to French Knowledge first and, if it is accepted there, we can easily duplicate it here. 324:

Okay, I will defer to your judgement, and a quality article in English would be a plus. I note however that both the English and French article on Kume Kunitake are very short. Hopefully the biography and controversy articles can be expanded appropriately. All the best,

1573:

website (I can't provide a direct link), the number is 3555289 for Sorbonne Law School, and 3555293 for Paris Law School). Someone was talking about bringing back the Paris II University article to the stub level, you will have to think about purging it too.

644:

The only way for the issue to be stopped is to have it solved. Blocking us won't solve the issue, it will only buy yourself some time. It will start again in a few months, probably with an other account (just like it happened on the French Knowledge).

365:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

3864:"Arguing with anonymous strangers on the Internet is a sucker's game because they almost always turn out to be -- or to be indistinguishable from -- self-righteous sixteen-year-olds possessing infinite amounts of free time." --Neil Stephenson, 1622:

You did the second one, but it does not seem you did the three other things. More worryingly, you just did another threat of "things going public" and damage to do to some institutions. You are also doubling on some of the point raised above by

2079:. I'm not going to take action on it. But if I see you similarly attacking others, or if someone else takes it to ANI, I will probably propose or support a block, and it may be indefinite. I note that you have already received a final warning. 769:

apply to both the French and the English version of Knowledge, and both must comply to it. So what happens on French Knowledge can have a consequence for other versions, and in some situations must be taken into account. I am refering to the

2323:

Demat. Tennet eo bet ganin al luc'hskeudenn hag a ziskouez ar rastelladeg er Faoued (7 a viz Mae 1944). Eus kornad ar Faoued on, ha biskoazh n'am eus klevet (gant tud eus ma familh, pe amezeien) pe lennet anv ar Bezen en afer-se... A galon.

1956:'s article, and your are latter refering to "these two". The "danger" might be real, but I have nothing to do with that article. I think you still don't really understand what's has been going on the the French and on the English Knowledge. 2892:

You cherrypicked a question that I asked during the SPI, ignore other elements provided by the other contributor, and dropped the rest of the SPI. I'm not disappointed about it ; you clearly said that you didn't want to have a look at

3231:

I would like a direct quote myself, but on quite another subject. XIIIfromTOKYO, can you provide a quote where anyone anywhere on Knowledge accused you of any wrongdoing and you agreed that you were wrong and promised to stop? Ever?

3359:

or the multiple times that you have told obvious lies about other editors, such as claiming someone admitted they were talking about your mental health with a link to them explaining that they were talking about their own mental

1295:

in the past ; this week's use of no less than 4 IPs to revert templates saying that this article was written like an advert clearly shows that any method, including criminal ones can be used by this individual, on group of

2776:

thinking was, maybe it's not worth looking into this much. If the editor is soon going to be blocked for sockpuppetry, why bother? I expected to find a compelling case which would probably soon be dealt with by admins.

3781:

I call for everyone involved to stop responding to XIIIfromTOKYO. They are obviously attempting to get a reaction. Let them shout into an empty hall for a while and we will see if they get tired of it and go elsewhere.

2050:

try to write in the introduction that the institution provided "fake education". Many contributors have tried to stop that beheaviour, but have been legally threaten, harrassed, and disgusted away by that contributor.

2086:

recommend that you abandon your feud here with Launebee. They are topic banned too. Others will keep an eye on them. Leave it alone, and find other areas in which to contribute, assuming that you wish to contribute.

2167:

is my advice, and feel free to comment on my talk page. In fact if you wish to let off steam and attack me that's probably a better place than your own, as I can be more forgiving there than others may be here.

215:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 2595: 2482: 2406: 393: 1822:

There is no ban on talkpage edits, but again I preach caution. Further disruption or incivility will not be taken lightly, and the excuse that you do not understand the relevant policies is wearing very thin

1630:

Regarding point 3, you seem to say that the perceived conspiracy I would be involved in, is the same perceived conspiracy that is doing legal procedures against French users (dating of January this year).

640:

I can give you the names of the admins who had to deal with the Paris-Assas issue on the French Wikipédia. It is clear that Launebee has been at work with the same methods on the French Knowledge before.

2579:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2466:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2390:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 377:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1547:

For the records, I not taking (and don't indend to take) any legal action against Launebee. I don't have any connection with these colleges, so I don't care about what can happen to them. But as a

2864:

folder, and pretend for your own sake that you didn't resort to that kind of rhethoric. Knowledge is not based on personnal reputation or ranking, but about rules. You know it, I know it.

1732: 2565: 2525: 1756:

Perfect. It took two years, a dozen of ANI reports, and hundreds of diffs. For the record, it took us only a few months to identify the issue on FR.Wikipédia, and to take care of it.

1003: 2636: 1554:

That said, you have to know that some Wikipedians have been recently targeted by legal actions in France, for edits done on FR.Wikipédia. You can read the details about that

1026:

The editor claims that "Sciences Pipeau" is a common attribution used for the institution and it is understood that it means that it is giving a "fake" eduction. This is for

1570: 1243: 722:. There is a disruptive work done, it is and targeting different projects. Again, I can give you the contact of the admin who had to deal with it on the French Knowledge. 27: 2129:(with one misunderstanding, see below). I hope you will continue to contribute, and so I very much hope that you will stop making bitter and pointless statements such as 2718: 2690: 2686: 2658: 2207: 2200: 1484: 1198: 424: 1239: 945: 941: 3493:"I'm not surprised, and I think MePhisto won't be either. Junk sources, fraudulent use of references, and abusive promotion of Paris Assas University. Nothing New." 3487:"An entire section added has been written inaccuratly pretending facts that are not in the sources and is using also poor source (Gala). It's like a gossip article" 3295: 3294:

And earlier in 20202, when I last started a GA process, I personally gave a thank to the other contributors who spent their times correcting my grammar mistakes

2152:

I have explicitly and consistently suggested that you be allowed to comment on the talk pages. There was no point in allowing this if you were not to allowed to

1231: 1819:

changes what a reader sees when they view an article, you could easily be seen to be in breach of the TBAN, and a lengthy or even indefinite block is likely.

436: 1555: 3370:

Feel free to have the last word with another long-winded reply. I will not read it. I have seen your song and dance act several times and am not impressed.

1909:. You are of course permitted to raise it again at ANI, but I would advise against it... that would almost certainly see you blocked again, in my opinion. 3351:

Admitting that you made a typo or some other simple error is not the same as admitting that you violated a Knowledge policy, as you did when you violated

1390:. You were previously blocked for edit warring in April 2017 which should have made you aware of the sort of behavior we consider problematic. Thank you, 1149:) is NOT for dispute resolution. Administrators cannot intervene in content disputes; you must seek dispute resolution by following the steps outlined in 2897:"I saw someone who doesn't seem to understand the basics of how things work around here, and seem unable to understand or accept what they've been told." 1119: 617: 516: 2295: 789:

Clearly, it's the same individual, as both account have been targeting the same article, with the same kind of references, and the same PR wordings.

3109:

You see, in a discussion in which you were involved, I specificaly asked to avoid words as "clean", explaining that, as a French, it was derogatory

3410:

two days ago. From the feedback I got, I wouldn't be surprised if things reach a solution by a set of outside initiatives. And I'm fine with that.

3285: 1838:

legal team of these. I would expect they already know, but a heads-up might be appropriate. They will notify other Wikipedias if it is necessary.

1264:. Checking the history, I see a large number of reverts by you, about 11 in the last 50 edits of the article. It looks like you have broken the 1569:" (and or "Paris Law School"). It came to my attention that it is a registred trademark, owned by Paris 1 University. You can check that on the 1427:, and as you can see on the article talkpage, no new discussion or consensus has emerge. You might also want to take a (very long) look at the 3520:

As you can see, we came to the same conclusion about this article. For some reason, it took you 2 more months to understand the core problem.

2068:

with those numbered points 1-4. They do not contradict anything I have said, as far as I can see. What exactly do you think I'm claiming that

1828: 460:. In the interest of keeping the discussion focused, I am going to strike off a lot of your statements. Please take it in the right spirit. 3428: 2617: 2496: 2420: 407: 240: 3112:. Your answer to my remark was "I have been cleaning up personal attacks from talk pages for a decade or more and will continue to do so" 3680: 3345: 2985: 2865: 1772: 1768: 1363: 988:

Critics often nickname the school "Sciences Pipeau" (pronounced "Sciences Pipo") because they consider it is giving a "fake" education.

575: 108: 2521: 1633:

Regarding point 4, you are saying that the "Sorbonne Law School" article that I created violated the French intellectual property law.

706:, a review of the article has been done, but there is no way to rewrite the article in a way that would take into account the feeback. 107:

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

2032: 2026: 2020: 2014: 489:

I have asked to the French village pump for more contributors to come, read the references, and give their opinion about the issue.

134: 3448:

The British tourists eventually will diffuse into the greater pattern of traffic and realize they're wrong. The drunk never does. ]

3407: 3250:

So you suggest that I'm a stubborn contributor who can't acknowledge when he is wrong, am I right ? You know that it's a breach of

1235: 1299:

Some people have been paid in the past to clean the French article of this university. The same SPA/IPs has been used on FR also.

633:

It is strange that I have been blocked before having the time to answer to your message, so let me answer here, on my talkpage.

3703: 3212:. That definitively settle the copyright infringement part. Altering my quote in order to change its meaning was not acceptable. 2861: 1292: 2613: 2492: 2416: 2043: 403: 236: 3022:

Could you please tell what was the "personal attacks towards other editors" that I made. If not the link, at least the quote.

2929:

The name of the second photo, "Couperet à débiter les lapins 04.jpg" means in French "cleaver used to slash open rabbits". Of

3082: 2900: 2736: 1834:

Regarding the legal issues in France, it would be good to discuss on French Knowledge whether it would be good to notify the

1698: 1562: 1344: 1176: 1154: 1049:

These policies apply in the same way on the French Knowledge, as most of the texts are just translations of the English one.

593: 457: 719:

I have been an active contributor on the French Knowledge for more than 10 years, and I have 100,000+ edits on all projects

3255: 2974: 2517: 1115: 613: 512: 286: 3259: 2588: 2475: 2399: 1352: 1226: 1218: 1074: 853: 649: 601: 563: 386: 227:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

3251: 2600: 2487: 2411: 2305: 2267: 1356: 637:

Block both of us if you must, but ultimately you will have to have a deep look at what has been going on for months.

571: 398: 232: 145: 69: 1779:

from a newly created account, who targets the same topic ("Sorbonnic" univeristy in Paris) is more that problematic.

771: 176: 2150:

recommend that you abandon your feud here with Launebee. They are topic banned too. Others will keep an eye on them.

1521: 856:, not a single reference, not a single line to do the same (still, I have provided many references on the talk page 2808: 2772:

realisation later. And yes, sometimes unfortunately an editor probably manages to stay around forever as a sock.

1014: 3665: 3660: 2965: 2076: 1324: 605: 541: 269:

Is this event really so significant and detailed that it needs its own article, or can it simply be discussed at

3168:

be subject to a permanent block if there is no retraction (and if he strikes his whole comment too of course). "

1111: 1068: 609: 508: 656:

articles. One of them if written like an advertisement, the other one as a libel ; both have the same author.

1512:

policy and seems to assert that he is engaged in criminal behavior. I've been discussing the problem over at

1640:"cautioned against comments addressing the motive or character of other conversants" only 20 minutes before 850:

75 % of the references, or 41 lines out of the 49 lines of the reputation sections focue on negative aspects

700: 3403:

You won, I have removed these articles fom my watch-list, and I don't want to hear of these articles again.

720: 2978: 2301: 2263: 1337: 1333: 567: 554: 550: 3296:

Il y a eu quelques relectures faites par Lepsyleon Théo Vansteenkeste, et de la carto faite par Sémhur"

2102:

I have been contributing for more than 10 years, have more than 100,000 contributions on all the projects

2576: 2463: 2387: 1873: 1520:. Any legal charges by you could be grounds for an indefinite block of your account under our policy of 374: 330: 278: 3844:

come to the conclusion you have a behavior problem. We've tried. From here out I'm taking GM's advice.

3266:

suggest that an other contributor is the cause of a wrongdoing (or lack of any good behavior, "Ever"),

3888:

As a point of pride I never mute anyone, block their email, or tell them not to post on my talk page.

3281: 784: 3701: 2886: 2789: 2724: 1835: 1529: 1501: 1395: 1274: 1164: 778: 51: 3929:

Maybe it's time for you to take a look at all of your comments, read the uCoC, and act accordingly.

1683:

doesn't need an interpreter or an assistant. So please refrain from making any edit on my talkpage.

3877: 3787: 3766: 3758: 3734: 3383: 3331: 3237: 2799: 2698: 2289: 2285: 2251: 2244: 2164: 1702: 1566: 1348: 1039: 897: 844:

did you take the time to simply read both articles ? Both were writen by the same contributor. For

597: 472: 228: 112: 2788:

want, but again your only real choice is to drop it on Knowledge for your sake as much as anyone.

3930: 3814: 3738: 3592: 3521: 3435: 3320: 3305: 3301:

So yes, I can even express gratitude to other contributors when they correct some of my mistakes.

3213: 3178: 3119: 3069: 3023: 2934: 2907: 2882: 2869: 2732: 2666: 2533: 2342: 2325: 2113: 2052: 1957: 1905:

I have reverted this edit. It was disruptive, again unintentionally I hope. I suggest we discuss

1877: 1780: 1706: 1684: 1652: 1597: 1575: 1544:

Could you please answer the question that I have asked you on the above section a few weeks ago ?

1497: 1457: 1433: 1300: 1194: 1172: 1095: 1089:

started to skip the usual way to report a problem, and started to personnaly ask a specific admin

1050: 949: 864: 802: 723: 709:

I have also tried to Request a community input, and left a message a the Project France talk page

696:

other contributors have already tried, but so far admins have been very slow to answer our calls.

657: 490: 311: 180: 3065:

That's why I ask you again to give me the actual "personal attacks towards other editors" part.

2101: 2559: 2450: 2374: 2223: 2173: 2092: 2000: 1914: 1853: 1513: 1381:

Since you declined my offer, I am going ahead with a block for your recent edit warring. Your

504: 361: 343: 204: 195: 123: 91: 3505:"This is WP:UNDUE. Feel free to put a less tabloidish version in the Olivier Duhamel article" 1675:, because a lot of admins came to the conclusion that you can't speak English. I assume that 948:, but asside from that, it's fairly stable (but that very good articles by French standards. 133:

If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can

3754: 3686: 3138: 3090: 3042: 3005: 2991: 2607: 2572: 2459: 2383: 2346: 2329: 1745: 1369: 980: 970: 919: 889: 857: 704: 581: 453: 370: 326: 304:

I have just finished to work on it on the French Knowledge, and it's currently undergoing a

297: 262: 224: 208: 162: 87: 73: 2587:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2474:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2398:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 385:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 223:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3696: 3481: 2956: 1678: 1624: 1604: 1548: 1539: 1525: 1448: 1418: 1406: 1391: 1387: 1315: 1284: 1270: 710: 533: 143: 43: 1793:

This seems to underline your extremely poor grasp of even elementary English. The ban is

1561:

One last thing (sorry, a lot of work). It has not been talked about, but there is also a

1157:(warning, blocking, protection, or deletion), you should take it to an appropriate forum. 3363:

I have plenty of examples of me admitting that I made a typo or some other simple error.

3920: 3894: 3873: 3850: 3799: 3783: 3762: 3614: 3557: 3500: 3472: 3449: 3398: 3394: 3379: 3356: 3352: 3327: 3247: 3233: 2841: 2820: 2795: 2694: 2584: 2471: 2395: 1862: 1760: 1509: 1261: 1146: 1035: 966: 915: 909: 893: 484: 468: 382: 220: 212: 3904:

So, when Guy Macon is not repeatedly comparing my to a drunk driver, now it's about a

2250:

I realize that you might be also interested in the discussion that is going on in the

1287:

one contributor clearly wants to harrass other contributors, and went so far as using

736:

What happens on French Knowledge has no bearing here (and vice versa). Have you tried

3670: 3341: 2728: 2662: 2580: 2529: 2467: 2391: 2211: 1984:"These two" refers to yourself and Launebee. "They" are Launebee as you guessed, see 1767:". Does it include talkpages, categories, ANI, incident reports... ans specifically 1663: 1648: 1265: 1188: 1168: 1084: 820: 798: 794: 741: 737: 464: 378: 270: 216: 173: 96: 3912: 3832: 3258:; so intead of voicing that aloud, you clumsily turn that into a question. Yet, the 2926:. Yet, I leave it here so that anyone can see the kind of beheaviour I have to face. 79: 3828: 3205: 2873: 2829: 2317: 2219: 2169: 2108:. So yeah, feel free to question my motives if you want. Facts don't matter anyway. 2088: 1996: 1935: 1910: 1849: 1150: 923: 672: 2551: 2441: 2365: 965:

Hi XIIIfromTOKYO, I think NeilN is also asking how French policies on issues like

352: 3573:, you have spent only 2 minutes to go through the talks. I can trust you on that. 3147: 3134: 3101: 3086: 3053: 3038: 3017: 3001: 2877: 1953: 1872:

Regarding the legal issues. You consider that I can't speak English, that I'm a

1736: 1619:

4. Withdraw your suggestion that I am violating the national laws of any country

1428: 1078: 1027: 559: 255: 158: 116: 101: 1514:

User talk:Andrewa#Your work on a long-running dispute about French universities

1137: 766: 2856: 1977:

it had been archived. As this is not permitted (and is itself disruptive, see

1202: 1199:

Knowledge:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Harassement_from_XIIIfromTokyo

976: 927: 861:

and even on the talk page, as Launebee is even erasing that from the talk page

845: 839: 824: 760: 745: 691: 676: 653: 628: 141: 3503:

removes the whole litigious part written by Delfield, and leaves the comment

859:). It's simply impossible to mention an the article that there is a problem, 3938: 3924: 3899: 3889: 3881: 3855: 3845: 3822: 3813:

had a beahaviour problem. Now might be the right time to adress that issue.

3791: 3770: 3746: 3705: 3619: 3609: 3600: 3570: 3562: 3552: 3529: 3508: 3461: 3454: 3443: 3387: 3335: 3313: 3241: 3221: 3186: 3142: 3127: 3094: 3077: 3046: 3031: 3009: 2942: 2915: 2836: 2815: 2803: 2740: 2702: 2670: 2621: 2537: 2500: 2424: 2350: 2333: 2309: 2271: 2227: 2177: 2121: 2096: 2060: 2004: 1965: 1918: 1885: 1857: 1788: 1750: 1714: 1692: 1656: 1583: 1533: 1465: 1441: 1399: 1308: 1278: 1210: 1180: 1122: 1103: 1058: 1043: 957: 935: 901: 872: 832: 810: 753: 731: 684: 665: 620: 519: 498: 476: 411: 334: 319: 244: 188: 166: 147: 58: 3651: 3273:

But, well actually yes, I think I can provide something around these lines.

3068:

I specifically asked for quotes. You have missed that part of my question.

823:. A French sdmin has no more say here than I do at the French Knowledge. -- 570:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 463:

If you have conduct allegations against other users, please report them at

38:

I (and the rest of us here, too) hope you like it here and decide to stay!

3118:

We don't see things the same way, and that's why I need the actual quote.

973:

etc. compare to ours on English Knowledge. Please answer that if you can.

819:

or go to Meta and request a global block. Sockpuppetry can be reported at

3679:

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the

3545:

For some reason, it took you 2 more months to understand the core problem

2984:

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the

1995:

Knowledge, and do not at this stage intend to do so. How is it relevant?

1362:

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the

3730:. And that's only for the last few days of racial and/or ethnic slurs. 3683:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: 2988:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: 2689:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is

2591:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2478:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2402:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1815:

caution, particularly when it comes to categories. If any of your edits

1551:, I'm concerned about what could happen if/when any of this goes public. 1424: 1366:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: 1110:

Yes and I just corrected it. It was the above section that mixed me up.

389:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2569:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2292:

talk page, I have request a dispute resolution regarding these pages.

785:

Launebee account has been created at 15:16, on the 1st of December 2015

308:

review. So, yes, it's really significant, and it needs its own article.

3669:

from editing for persistent disruption per the community consensus at

3304:

Oh, and by the way, can you provide that kind of quote for yourself ?

3277: 2105: 2661:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

2247:

talk page. I share your astonishment regarding its current content.

2208:

Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#XIIIfromTokyo, again

1900:

I note that you have edited the ANI discussion after it was closed.

1759:

Could you be more specific about the "French academic institutions"

779:

Droas account has been created at 14:29, on the 1st of December 2015

456:

debate is quite welcome. However, you are deviating pretty far from

2930: 2903:. Knowledge is not about your believes, it's about community rules. 2784:

unfair, but it's also a conclusion your words and actions led to.

2637:

Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Launebee/Archive#28 August 2020

849: 3827: 3804:

On the contrary. You have repeatedly compared my to a drunk driver

3757:. This means remove the alleged information if possible and email 3576:

Speaking of inappropriate content. Maybe you should consider that

3541:– Not if they keep inbibing to stave off the intrusion of reality. 2828: 2807: 578:, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: 467:. The article talk pages are not the place to voice them. Cheers, 443:

TLDR, a French sockpuppet targets Sciences Po & Assas articles

3490:. I came to the same conclusion and left the following comment : 3161:

he is directly calling the Duhamel story "pedophile conspiracies"

2933:, the one with a French title has been chosen. And what a title. 2854:"Success", "credibility", "legitimate"... let's move that to the 2296:

Knowledge:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Talk:University_of_Paris

1616:

3. State that you are note asserting I am engaged in a conspiracy

211:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge

2604:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 3733:

And most of the voters at ANI have been previously selected to

2594:

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review

2508:

Nomination for deletion of Template:Location map France Le Mans

2481:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

2405:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

914:

I have no idea how the French Knowledge handles the nuances of

888:(tps) Hi Neil, I have been trying to mediate the discussion at 392:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

2563:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All

1132: 1610:

1. Withdraw you edit claiming that I violated the sock policy

716:

So what should I do next ? Noticeboards ? Well, there we are.

3650: 3434:

So again, you won, but you might not like the final reward.

3165:

hurtful and disrespectful for the many victims of pedophilia

3159:"I read better the comment of XIIIfromTokyo, and I saw that 2955: 2721:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

2643:

TLDR, a French user targets Sciences Po & Assas articles

1613:

2. State that you are not taking any legal action against me

1314: 1193:

Please actually read the text of the template you're using.

1145:

Please note that the Administrators' Noticeboard/Incidents (

1136: 532: 78: 3286:"il y a un gros travail de relecture à faire (orthographe)" 2341:

Hag adlakaet eo bet al luc'hskeudenn... N'eus forzh petra!

2203:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

1487:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

427:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

131:

Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.

1351:. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek 600:. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek 2526:

the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page

2019:

I have never edited the Science po article. Not even once

3115:. Despite my remark, you boldly choose to use that word. 3058:, Yes, I saw you celebrating the moment that you said "" 2031:

Je n'ai pas édité une seule fois l'article de Science Po

1981:

above), I have reverted it there, and will reply here.

3905: 3809:. After these insults, you came to the conclusion that 3807: 3805: 3727: 3723: 3719: 3712: 3673: 3584: 3577: 3512: 3504: 3492: 3486: 3425: 3423: 3421: 3419: 3417: 3415: 3364: 3171: 3113: 3110: 2924: 2575:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2462:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2386:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2215: 2160:

contributors such as yourselves. You left us no choice.

1985: 1969: 1901: 1776: 1641: 1637: 1517: 1505: 1454: 1382: 1251: 1247: 1092: 1090: 946:

fr:Discussion:École de droit de Sciences Po/Suppression

942:

fr:Discussion:École de droit de la Sorbonne/Suppression

860: 373:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

35:

To get started, click on the link that says "welcome".

2025:"O" is the number of my edit on the Science Po article 1804:(my emphasis). Do you really think that this includes 1508:

which seems to charge Launebee with violations of our

1081:

on the message. It might be related to that fact that

265:

just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

2259:

Could you please help us to reach a consensus there?

1355:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 604:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 100:

created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one

1867:

Unless clearly and unambiguously specified otherwise

940:

RfD have targeted ""law schools"" of these colleges

3355:while falsely accusing another editor of violating 250:

A page you started (Kume affair) has been reviewed!

2977:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 2899:I was about to drop a cleaver answer to that, but 2524:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at 1763:? You wrote that I was "topic-banned from making 1336:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 1260:This article came to my attention per a report at 1015:France Inter, L'école de l'élite : Sciences Pipo ? 566:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 671:Instead of edit warring, you should have pursued 203:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 157:You cannot remove the materials of the articles. 104:that directly supports material in the article. 1453:Is this kind of revert considered as acceptable 1004:Sciences Po déçoit-il ses élèves de 1ere année ? 979:, I find that we really have no basis to assess 815:You need to state how Launebee violated the TOU 3646:Ban of the "apeshit" "drunk" "Froggish" speaker 3466:Drunk people eventually sober up at some point. 2719:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 2691:XIIIfromTOKYO (need an admin who speaks French) 2687:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 2659:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 2201:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 1636:This is very problematic. Especially since you 1485:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 1153:. If your incident report cannot result in an 986: 425:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 2039:What you claim has nothing to do with reality. 1952:education". I don't have a single edit on the 452:Dear XIIIfromTokyo, your participation in the 3163:. I cannot withstand that such comment is so 1705:" is still openned and has to be dealt with. 431:Sciences Po & Assas : Sockpuppet Launebee 8: 3608:is a word I'd stay away from if I were you. 2923:Unsolicited photo of a graphic NSFW material 2833:Though some might prefer a cleavage answer. 2243:I have seen that you made your point at the 1806:talkpages, categories, ANI, incident reports 437:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations/Launebee 277:To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's 3408:topic about that on the French village-pump 3062:ll have no more from XIII for 48 hours. "". 1973:Note that this was added to the discussion 1829:fr:Wikipédia:Bistro des non-francophones/en 1197:, a thread about you has been opened here: 2546: 2013:I have never edited the Science po article 1343:During a dispute, you should first try to 1162: 711:Request community input on article content 592:During a dispute, you should first try to 3578:posting boobs on my talk page like you do 1571:National Institute of Industrial Property 3583:inappropriate. And so is using the word 2106:dozens of GA/FA articles on fr.Knowledge 1775:? You can easily understand I hope that 3037:I commented on that in the ANI thread. 2631:Sciences Po & Assas : User Delfield 1993:what's has been going on the the French 1978: 1906: 1549:10+ years old, 100.000 edits wikimedian 996: 3544: 3538: 3284:, I asked other contributors to do so 3276:As you can see, I've written about 50 3262:is still on your side, not mine. When 2975:personal attacks towards other editors 2812:I was about to drop a cleaver answer. 2042:Only Launebee has edited the article ( 115:. Once you have provided at least one 3484:started the discussion, stating that 1383:addition of article quality templates 7: 3376:"My God! There are DOZENS of them!!" 3291:So, I acknoledge that I do mistakes. 3278:feature and good articles on fr.wiki 2860:arguments folder will you, near the 2560:2020 Arbitration Committee elections 2518:Template:Location map France Le Mans 2451:2018 Arbitration Committee elections 2448:Hello, XIIIfromTOKYO. Voting in the 2375:2017 Arbitration Committee elections 2372:Hello, XIIIfromTOKYO. Voting in the 2075:And please, that could be seen as a 1500:. Some of your behavior falls under 362:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 359:Hello, XIIIfromTOKYO. Voting in the 94:because under Knowledge policy, all 3718:My comments have been described as 3227:TLDR : Drunk driver insults mobbing 2717:There is currently a discussion at 2685:There is currently a discussion at 2657:There is currently a discussion at 2543:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message 2284:Given the lack of consensus on the 2199:There is currently a discussion at 1991:I have not had time to investigate 1483:There is currently a discussion at 423:There is currently a discussion at 109:Knowledge:Referencing for beginners 3906:"self-righteous sixteen-year-olds" 3737:the decision. That's simply epic. 3511:goes further, leaving the comment 3270:have to provide the direct quotes. 2435:ArbCom 2018 election voter message 2359:ArbCom 2017 election voter message 2262:Thank you and have a nice day. -- 1844:that the contribution you cite is 926:. Is the French article stable? -- 137:when you are ready to add one. -- 14: 3753:should follow the suggestions at 229:review the candidates' statements 3539:Drunk people eventually sober up 3477:are showing signs of recovery : 2868:is one of these rule, and so is 2862:Knowledge:Avoid personal remarks 2712: 2680: 2652: 2550: 2512: 2440: 2364: 2194: 1478: 418: 351: 2598:and submit your choices on the 2485:and submit your choices on the 2409:and submit your choices on the 2216:left that unsigned notification 1802:on French academic institutions 3713:my identity has been disclosed 3106:So, what is the actual quote ? 3083:Knowledge:Colons and asterisks 2747:Good evidence and bad evidence 2671:06:39, 13 September 2020 (UTC) 2070:has nothing to do with reality 1466:11:57, 16 September 2017 (UTC) 1442:07:38, 16 September 2017 (UTC) 1400:01:23, 16 September 2017 (UTC) 1309:18:26, 15 September 2017 (UTC) 1279:21:58, 13 September 2017 (UTC) 713:. But again, that was useless. 235:. For the Election committee, 205:Arbitration Committee election 196:ArbCom elections are now open! 1: 3911:I fail to see how it fits in 3513:Jesus, who writes this dreck? 3444:14:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC) 3406:Full-disclosure, I openned a 3388:13:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC) 3336:11:49, 25 February 2021 (UTC) 3314:08:25, 25 February 2021 (UTC) 3242:06:52, 25 February 2021 (UTC) 3187:23:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC) 3143:23:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC) 3128:22:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC) 3095:22:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC) 3078:21:56, 23 February 2021 (UTC) 3047:21:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC) 3032:21:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC) 3010:21:34, 23 February 2021 (UTC) 2969:from editing for a period of 2916:20:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC) 2804:18:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC) 2741:09:41, 22 February 2021 (UTC) 2703:14:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC) 2622:01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC) 2577:Knowledge arbitration process 2538:15:47, 21 December 2018 (UTC) 2501:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 2464:Knowledge arbitration process 2388:Knowledge arbitration process 2156:, was there? I hope you will. 2010:Ok, let me explain it again. 1940:could please specify who are 1518:implied that he is a criminal 1345:discuss controversial changes 1328:from editing for a period of 594:discuss controversial changes 545:from editing for a period of 412:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 375:Knowledge arbitration process 245:13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 97:biographies of living persons 3722:, my comments as those of a 3469:Like it or not, but you and 3346:WP:AGF is not a suicide pact 3157:That's Delfield statement : 2425:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 2310:21:37, 19 January 2018 (UTC) 2272:19:54, 19 January 2018 (UTC) 2228:09:18, 13 October 2017 (UTC) 2178:19:53, 12 October 2017 (UTC) 2122:14:12, 12 October 2017 (UTC) 2097:12:35, 12 October 2017 (UTC) 2061:07:12, 12 October 2017 (UTC) 2005:05:52, 12 October 2017 (UTC) 1966:13:20, 11 October 2017 (UTC) 1919:18:29, 11 October 2017 (UTC) 1886:06:56, 12 October 2017 (UTC) 1858:05:08, 12 October 2017 (UTC) 1789:13:07, 11 October 2017 (UTC) 1751:12:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC) 1731:Pursuant to the above-noted 1715:07:29, 12 October 2017 (UTC) 1693:07:29, 12 October 2017 (UTC) 1657:19:50, 11 October 2017 (UTC) 1607:asked you to do four things: 1584:12:37, 11 October 2017 (UTC) 1034:duplicate it afterwards. -- 648:Take a few minutes to read 135:request that it be undeleted 59:10:59, 1 February 2009 (UTC) 2142:Others will keep an eye on 1534:16:42, 4 October 2017 (UTC) 396:and submit your choices on 335:22:31, 7 October 2016 (UTC) 320:22:23, 7 October 2016 (UTC) 231:and submit your choices on 3967: 3154:doesn't make it an insult. 2614:MediaWiki message delivery 2493:MediaWiki message delivery 2417:MediaWiki message delivery 2135:nothing to do with reality 1556:on the French village pump 1423:. The whole discussion is 1123:16:55, 30 April 2017 (UTC) 1104:16:48, 30 April 2017 (UTC) 958:19:44, 30 April 2017 (UTC) 936:19:16, 30 April 2017 (UTC) 902:18:10, 30 April 2017 (UTC) 873:19:44, 30 April 2017 (UTC) 833:17:34, 30 April 2017 (UTC) 811:17:25, 30 April 2017 (UTC) 783:On the English Knowledge, 754:17:08, 30 April 2017 (UTC) 732:17:04, 30 April 2017 (UTC) 685:16:49, 30 April 2017 (UTC) 666:16:43, 30 April 2017 (UTC) 621:16:42, 30 April 2017 (UTC) 520:16:50, 30 April 2017 (UTC) 499:12:15, 16 April 2017 (UTC) 477:11:23, 16 April 2017 (UTC) 404:MediaWiki message delivery 394:the candidates' statements 237:MediaWiki message delivery 24:Hello, XIIIfromTOKYO, and 3939:10:46, 2 March 2021 (UTC) 3900:01:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC) 3882:01:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC) 3856:21:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC) 3833:GM -- Mark of excellence! 3823:20:19, 1 March 2021 (UTC) 3792:20:07, 1 March 2021 (UTC) 3771:11:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC) 3747:16:02, 1 March 2021 (UTC) 3706:15:14, 1 March 2021 (UTC) 3681:guide to appealing blocks 3620:20:58, 1 March 2021 (UTC) 3601:19:51, 1 March 2021 (UTC) 3563:19:22, 1 March 2021 (UTC) 3530:17:51, 1 March 2021 (UTC) 3499:And now, in early March, 3455:17:11, 1 March 2021 (UTC) 3222:10:12, 5 March 2021 (UTC) 2986:guide to appealing blocks 2979:make useful contributions 2943:19:55, 1 March 2021 (UTC) 2351:19:28, 23 July 2017 (UTC) 2334:19:07, 23 July 2017 (UTC) 2131:Facts don't matter anyway 1944:in "the institution that 1777:this kind of contribution 1773:Sockpuppet investigations 1411:there was a consensus on 1364:guide to appealing blocks 1338:make useful contributions 1227:Panthéon-Assas University 1219:Panthéon-Assas University 1075:Panthéon-Assas University 1065:EDIT : and I assume that 854:Panthéon-Assas University 777:On the French Knowledge, 650:Panthéon-Assas University 576:guide to appealing blocks 568:make useful contributions 564:Panthéon-Assas University 189:12:54, 1 April 2014 (UTC) 167:08:22, 1 April 2014 (UTC) 3934: 3818: 3742: 3726:, and French langage as 3596: 3525: 3439: 3340:You exhausted everyones 3309: 3217: 3182: 3123: 3073: 3027: 2938: 2931:all the available photos 2911: 2612:to your user talk page. 2117: 2056: 1881: 1784: 1710: 1697:The question toward the 1688: 1579: 1461: 1437: 1304: 1211:09:29, 14 May 2017 (UTC) 1181:09:17, 14 May 2017 (UTC) 1099: 1054: 953: 868: 806: 767:fondation's Terms of Use 744:for a specific issue? -- 727: 661: 494: 315: 184: 148:12:48, 15 May 2010 (UTC) 3282:fr:Histoire de la Corée 1948:do not favour offers a 1668:I must assume that you 1506:your recent edit at ANI 1504:. I am concerned about 1059:06:35, 1 May 2017 (UTC) 1044:01:05, 1 May 2017 (UTC) 458:WP:Talk page guidelines 3835: 3655: 3585:"Froggish" like you do 2960: 2847: 2826: 2522:nominated for deletion 1928:From the ANI archive: 1699:copyright infringement 1603:If I am not mistaken, 1563:copyright infringement 1319: 1141: 1023: 537: 275: 153:Warnning for Vandalism 83: 3831: 3691:Your reason here ~~~~ 3654: 2996:Your reason here ~~~~ 2959: 2832: 2811: 2573:Arbitration Committee 2557:Hello! Voting in the 2460:Arbitration Committee 2384:Arbitration Committee 2281:Dear XIIIfromTokyo, 2214:, who also of course 2044:102 times as of today 1874:functional illiterate 1374:Your reason here ~~~~ 1318: 1140: 586:Your reason here ~~~~ 574:by first reading the 536: 371:Arbitration Committee 344:ArbCom Elections 2016 267: 209:Arbitration Committee 119:, you may remove the 92:proposed for deletion 82: 28:welcome to Knowledge! 3777:Feeding time is over 2240:Dear XIIIfromTokyo, 2210:which was raised by 1836:Wikimedia Foundation 1733:discussion at WP:ANI 1388:making legal threats 1155:administrator action 254:Thanks for creating 3759:Knowledge:Oversight 3150:in the same order. 2885:and other parts of 2290:Sorbonne University 2286:University of Paris 2252:University of Paris 2245:Sorbonne University 2236:University of Paris 1979:#Further disruption 1865:clearly says that " 1811:But I would preach 1703:Sorbonne Law School 1567:Sorbonne Law School 1522:WP:No legal threats 1415:the templates with 1112:CambridgeBayWeather 1069:CambridgeBayWeather 610:CambridgeBayWeather 509:CambridgeBayWeather 448:Talk page etiquette 213:arbitration process 113:Knowledge:Help desk 3836: 3656: 3480:In early January, 2961: 2901:the bet is too big 2848: 2827: 2589:arbitration policy 2476:arbitration policy 2400:arbitration policy 2277:Dispute resolution 2206:Specifically, see 1924:Further discussion 1896:Further disruption 1701:about the use of " 1598:User:XIIIfromTOKYO 1565:about the use of " 1498:User:XIIIfromTOKYO 1353:dispute resolution 1320: 1142: 673:dispute resolution 602:dispute resolution 572:request an unblock 553:and violating the 538: 387:arbitration policy 346:: Voting now open! 258:, XIIIfromTOKYO! 225:arbitration policy 84: 3344:a long tome ago. 3252:Assume good faith 2727:comment added by 2628: 2627: 2302:SirJamesMcBiscuit 2264:SirJamesMcBiscuit 1183: 1167:comment added by 1161: 1160: 555:three-revert rule 290: 285:Learn more about 261:Knowledge editor 70:Proposed deletion 3958: 3928: 3803: 3694: 3476: 3465: 3429:high-maintenance 3402: 3324: 3256:personnal attack 3105: 3057: 3021: 2999: 2792:comes to mind. 2743: 2716: 2715: 2684: 2683: 2656: 2655: 2611: 2554: 2547: 2516: 2515: 2444: 2368: 2198: 2197: 1939: 1743: 1682: 1667: 1482: 1481: 1452: 1422: 1410: 1377: 1256: 1255: 1217:Edit warring at 1207: 1192: 1133: 1088: 1072: 1017: 1012: 1006: 1001: 932: 913: 890:Talk:Sciences Po 843: 829: 793:and a half with 764: 750: 695: 681: 632: 589: 557:, as you did at 488: 454:Talk:Sciences Po 422: 421: 355: 301: 284: 140: 128: 122: 54: 46: 41:Happy editing! 3966: 3965: 3961: 3960: 3959: 3957: 3956: 3955: 3954: 3953: 3918: 3797: 3779: 3709: 3708: 3684: 3677: 3648: 3591:inappropriate. 3470: 3459: 3392: 3318: 3260:burden of proof 3229: 3099: 3051: 3015: 3013: 3012: 2989: 2982: 2953: 2846: 2825: 2749: 2722: 2713: 2710: 2681: 2678: 2653: 2650: 2644: 2633: 2605: 2545: 2513: 2510: 2505: 2504: 2445: 2437: 2429: 2428: 2369: 2361: 2321: 2314: 2313: 2279: 2238: 2195: 2192: 2154:keep an eye on 2077:personal attack 1933: 1926: 1898: 1737: 1729: 1676: 1661: 1540:User:EdJohnston 1493: 1479: 1476: 1446: 1416: 1404: 1380: 1379: 1367: 1360: 1357:page protection 1341: 1229: 1225: 1222: 1205: 1186: 1131: 1082: 1073:meant to write 1066: 1024: 1022: 1021: 1020: 1013: 1009: 1002: 998: 930: 907: 837: 827: 758: 748: 689: 679: 626: 624: 606:page protection 579: 530: 482: 450: 444: 433: 419: 416: 415: 399:the voting page 356: 348: 295: 252: 233:the voting page 199: 155: 138: 126: 120: 117:reliable source 77: 52: 44: 22: 12: 11: 5: 3964: 3962: 3952: 3951: 3950: 3949: 3948: 3947: 3946: 3945: 3944: 3943: 3942: 3941: 3916: 3913:Wikimedia uCoC 3909: 3870: 3869: 3868: 3826: 3825: 3778: 3775: 3774: 3773: 3724:"drunk driver" 3678: 3658:You have been 3657: 3649: 3647: 3644: 3643: 3642: 3641: 3640: 3639: 3638: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3634: 3633: 3632: 3631: 3630: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3626: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3622: 3574: 3550: 3549: 3548: 3542: 3518: 3517: 3516: 3497: 3467: 3432: 3411: 3404: 3371: 3368: 3361: 3349: 3302: 3299: 3292: 3289: 3274: 3271: 3228: 3225: 3202: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3198: 3197: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3193: 3192: 3191: 3190: 3189: 3174: 3155: 3116: 3107: 3066: 3063: 2983: 2963:You have been 2962: 2954: 2952: 2949: 2948: 2947: 2946: 2945: 2927: 2905: 2904: 2894: 2890: 2850: 2834: 2813: 2748: 2745: 2709: 2706: 2677: 2674: 2649: 2646: 2645: 2642: 2641: 2632: 2629: 2626: 2625: 2596:the candidates 2566:eligible users 2555: 2544: 2541: 2509: 2506: 2483:the candidates 2446: 2439: 2438: 2436: 2433: 2431: 2407:the candidates 2370: 2363: 2362: 2360: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2320: 2315: 2278: 2275: 2237: 2234: 2232: 2191: 2190:New ANI notice 2188: 2187: 2186: 2185: 2184: 2183: 2182: 2181: 2180: 2161: 2157: 2138: 2109: 2080: 2073: 2040: 2037: 2036: 2035: 2029: 2023: 2017: 1925: 1922: 1897: 1894: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1888: 1870: 1839: 1832: 1824: 1820: 1809: 1757: 1728: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1717: 1695: 1645: 1642:these comments 1634: 1631: 1628: 1620: 1617: 1614: 1611: 1608: 1601: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1559: 1552: 1545: 1542: 1492: 1489: 1475: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1469: 1468: 1361: 1342: 1322:You have been 1321: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1297: 1258: 1257: 1221: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1159: 1158: 1143: 1130: 1127: 1126: 1125: 1116:Uqaqtuq (talk) 1107: 1106: 1062: 1061: 1019: 1018: 1007: 995: 994: 990: 985: 963: 962: 961: 960: 886: 885: 884: 883: 882: 881: 880: 879: 878: 877: 876: 875: 790: 787: 781: 775: 774:in particular. 717: 714: 707: 703:has been tryed 697: 636: 614:Uqaqtuq (talk) 539:You have been 531: 529: 526: 525: 524: 523: 522: 513:Uqaqtuq (talk) 449: 446: 445: 442: 441: 432: 429: 357: 350: 349: 347: 341: 340: 339: 338: 337: 327:--Animalparty! 309: 302: 251: 248: 202: 198: 193: 192: 191: 177:banned from FR 172:Sockpuppet of 154: 151: 76: 67: 66: 65: 64: 63: 62: 61: 21: 18: 16: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3963: 3940: 3936: 3932: 3931:XIIIfromTOKYO 3926: 3922: 3917: 3914: 3910: 3907: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3898: 3897: 3893: 3892: 3887: 3886: 3885: 3884: 3883: 3879: 3875: 3871: 3867: 3866:Cryptonomicon 3863: 3862: 3859: 3858: 3857: 3854: 3853: 3849: 3848: 3843: 3840: 3839: 3838: 3837: 3834: 3830: 3824: 3820: 3816: 3815:XIIIfromTOKYO 3812: 3808: 3806: 3801: 3796: 3795: 3794: 3793: 3789: 3785: 3776: 3772: 3768: 3764: 3760: 3756: 3751: 3750: 3749: 3748: 3744: 3740: 3739:XIIIfromTOKYO 3736: 3731: 3729: 3725: 3721: 3716: 3714: 3707: 3704: 3702: 3700: 3699: 3692: 3688: 3682: 3675: 3672: 3668: 3667: 3663: 3662: 3653: 3645: 3621: 3618: 3617: 3613: 3612: 3607: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3598: 3594: 3593:XIIIfromTOKYO 3590: 3586: 3582: 3579: 3575: 3572: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3561: 3560: 3556: 3555: 3551: 3546: 3543: 3540: 3537: 3536: 3535: 3534: 3533: 3532: 3531: 3527: 3523: 3522:XIIIfromTOKYO 3519: 3514: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3498: 3495: 3494: 3489: 3488: 3483: 3479: 3478: 3474: 3468: 3463: 3458: 3457: 3456: 3453: 3452: 3447: 3446: 3445: 3441: 3437: 3436:XIIIfromTOKYO 3433: 3430: 3426: 3424: 3422: 3420: 3418: 3416: 3412: 3409: 3405: 3400: 3396: 3391: 3390: 3389: 3385: 3381: 3377: 3372: 3369: 3365: 3362: 3358: 3354: 3350: 3347: 3343: 3339: 3338: 3337: 3333: 3329: 3322: 3321:XIIIfromTOKYO 3317: 3316: 3315: 3311: 3307: 3306:XIIIfromTOKYO 3303: 3300: 3297: 3293: 3290: 3287: 3283: 3279: 3275: 3272: 3269: 3265: 3261: 3257: 3253: 3249: 3246: 3245: 3244: 3243: 3239: 3235: 3226: 3224: 3223: 3219: 3215: 3214:XIIIfromTOKYO 3211: 3207: 3188: 3184: 3180: 3179:XIIIfromTOKYO 3175: 3172: 3169: 3166: 3162: 3156: 3152: 3151: 3149: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3140: 3136: 3131: 3130: 3129: 3125: 3121: 3120:XIIIfromTOKYO 3117: 3114: 3111: 3108: 3103: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3092: 3088: 3084: 3081: 3080: 3079: 3075: 3071: 3070:XIIIfromTOKYO 3067: 3064: 3061: 3055: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3044: 3040: 3036: 3035: 3034: 3033: 3029: 3025: 3024:XIIIfromTOKYO 3019: 3011: 3007: 3003: 2997: 2993: 2987: 2980: 2976: 2972: 2968: 2967: 2958: 2950: 2944: 2940: 2936: 2935:XIIIfromTOKYO 2932: 2928: 2925: 2922: 2921: 2920: 2919: 2918: 2917: 2913: 2909: 2908:XIIIfromTOKYO 2902: 2898: 2895: 2891: 2888: 2887:WP:Harassment 2884: 2879: 2875: 2871: 2867: 2863: 2859: 2858: 2853: 2852: 2851: 2845: 2844: 2840: 2839: 2831: 2824: 2823: 2819: 2818: 2810: 2806: 2805: 2801: 2797: 2793: 2791: 2790:WP:Dead horse 2785: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2753: 2746: 2744: 2742: 2738: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2720: 2707: 2705: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2693:. Thank you. 2692: 2688: 2675: 2673: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2660: 2647: 2640: 2638: 2630: 2624: 2623: 2619: 2615: 2609: 2603: 2602: 2597: 2592: 2590: 2586: 2582: 2578: 2574: 2568: 2567: 2562: 2561: 2556: 2553: 2549: 2548: 2542: 2540: 2539: 2535: 2531: 2527: 2523: 2519: 2507: 2503: 2502: 2498: 2494: 2490: 2489: 2484: 2479: 2477: 2473: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2456: 2453: 2452: 2443: 2434: 2432: 2427: 2426: 2422: 2418: 2414: 2413: 2408: 2403: 2401: 2397: 2393: 2389: 2385: 2380: 2377: 2376: 2367: 2358: 2352: 2348: 2344: 2340: 2339: 2338: 2337: 2336: 2335: 2331: 2327: 2319: 2316: 2312: 2311: 2307: 2303: 2298: 2297: 2293: 2291: 2287: 2282: 2276: 2274: 2273: 2269: 2265: 2260: 2257: 2255: 2253: 2248: 2246: 2241: 2235: 2233: 2230: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2204: 2202: 2189: 2179: 2175: 2171: 2166: 2163:Take a short 2162: 2158: 2155: 2151: 2149: 2144:, no, I said 2143: 2139: 2136: 2132: 2128: 2125: 2124: 2123: 2119: 2115: 2114:XIIIfromTOKYO 2110: 2107: 2103: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2094: 2090: 2085: 2081: 2078: 2074: 2071: 2067: 2064: 2063: 2062: 2058: 2054: 2053:XIIIfromTOKYO 2049: 2045: 2041: 2038: 2033: 2030: 2027: 2024: 2021: 2018: 2015: 2012: 2011: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2002: 1998: 1994: 1989: 1987: 1982: 1980: 1976: 1971: 1970: 1968: 1967: 1963: 1959: 1958:XIIIfromTOKYO 1955: 1949: 1947: 1943: 1937: 1929: 1923: 1921: 1920: 1916: 1912: 1908: 1903: 1902: 1895: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1878:XIIIfromTOKYO 1875: 1871: 1868: 1864: 1861: 1860: 1859: 1855: 1851: 1847: 1843: 1840: 1837: 1833: 1830: 1825: 1821: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1807: 1803: 1801: 1797: 1792: 1791: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1781:XIIIfromTOKYO 1778: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1752: 1749: 1748: 1744: 1742: 1741: 1734: 1726: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1707:XIIIfromTOKYO 1704: 1700: 1696: 1694: 1690: 1686: 1685:XIIIfromTOKYO 1680: 1674: 1671: 1665: 1660: 1659: 1658: 1654: 1650: 1646: 1643: 1639: 1635: 1632: 1629: 1626: 1621: 1618: 1615: 1612: 1609: 1606: 1602: 1599: 1595: 1594: 1593: 1592: 1591: 1590: 1585: 1581: 1577: 1576:XIIIfromTOKYO 1572: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1557: 1553: 1550: 1546: 1543: 1541: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1515: 1511: 1507: 1503: 1502:WP:ASPERSIONS 1499: 1495: 1494: 1490: 1488: 1486: 1473: 1467: 1463: 1459: 1458:XIIIfromTOKYO 1455: 1450: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1434:XIIIfromTOKYO 1430: 1426: 1420: 1414: 1408: 1403: 1402: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1384: 1375: 1371: 1365: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1326: 1317: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1301:XIIIfromTOKYO 1298: 1294: 1290: 1286: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1267: 1263: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1237: 1233: 1228: 1224: 1223: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1209: 1208: 1200: 1196: 1195:XIIIfromTOKYO 1190: 1185: 1184: 1182: 1178: 1174: 1170: 1166: 1156: 1152: 1148: 1144: 1139: 1135: 1134: 1128: 1124: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1108: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1096:XIIIfromTOKYO 1093: 1091: 1086: 1080: 1076: 1070: 1064: 1063: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1051:XIIIfromTOKYO 1048: 1047: 1046: 1045: 1041: 1037: 1031: 1029: 1016: 1011: 1008: 1005: 1000: 997: 993: 989: 984: 982: 978: 974: 972: 968: 959: 955: 951: 950:XIIIfromTOKYO 947: 943: 939: 938: 937: 934: 933: 925: 921: 917: 911: 906: 905: 904: 903: 899: 895: 891: 874: 870: 866: 865:XIIIfromTOKYO 862: 858: 855: 851: 847: 841: 836: 835: 834: 831: 830: 822: 818: 814: 813: 812: 808: 804: 803:XIIIfromTOKYO 800: 796: 791: 788: 786: 782: 780: 776: 773: 768: 762: 757: 756: 755: 752: 751: 743: 739: 735: 734: 733: 729: 725: 724:XIIIfromTOKYO 721: 718: 715: 712: 708: 705: 702: 698: 693: 688: 687: 686: 683: 682: 674: 670: 669: 668: 667: 663: 659: 658:XIIIfromTOKYO 655: 651: 646: 642: 638: 634: 630: 623: 622: 619: 615: 611: 607: 603: 599: 595: 587: 583: 577: 573: 569: 565: 562: 561: 556: 552: 548: 544: 543: 535: 527: 521: 518: 514: 510: 506: 502: 501: 500: 496: 492: 491:XIIIfromTOKYO 486: 481: 480: 479: 478: 474: 470: 466: 461: 459: 455: 447: 440: 438: 430: 428: 426: 414: 413: 409: 405: 401: 400: 395: 390: 388: 384: 380: 376: 372: 367: 364: 363: 354: 345: 342: 336: 332: 328: 323: 322: 321: 317: 313: 312:XIIIfromTOKYO 310: 307: 303: 299: 293: 292: 291: 288: 287:page curation 282: 280: 274: 272: 271:Kume Kunitake 266: 264: 259: 257: 249: 247: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 214: 210: 206: 197: 194: 190: 186: 182: 181:XIIIfromTOKYO 178: 175: 171: 170: 169: 168: 164: 160: 152: 150: 149: 146: 144: 142: 136: 132: 125: 118: 114: 110: 105: 103: 99: 98: 93: 89: 88:Cécile Corbel 81: 75: 74:Cécile Corbel 71: 68: 60: 56: 55: 48: 47: 40: 39: 37: 36: 34: 33: 32: 31: 30: 29: 19: 17: 3895: 3890: 3865: 3851: 3846: 3841: 3810: 3780: 3735:WP:VOTESTACK 3732: 3717: 3710: 3697: 3690: 3666:indefinitely 3664: 3659: 3615: 3610: 3605: 3588: 3580: 3558: 3553: 3491: 3485: 3450: 3427:. That's an 3375: 3267: 3263: 3230: 3209: 3206:Moral rights 3204:The article 3203: 3164: 3160: 3158: 3059: 3014: 2995: 2970: 2964: 2951:2 days block 2906: 2896: 2855: 2849: 2842: 2837: 2821: 2816: 2794: 2786: 2782: 2778: 2774: 2770: 2766: 2762: 2758: 2754: 2750: 2723:— Preceding 2711: 2679: 2676:ANI-notice B 2651: 2648:ANI-notice A 2634: 2599: 2593: 2570: 2564: 2558: 2511: 2486: 2480: 2457: 2449: 2447: 2430: 2410: 2404: 2381: 2373: 2371: 2322: 2318:Bezen Perrot 2299: 2294: 2283: 2280: 2261: 2258: 2249: 2242: 2239: 2231: 2205: 2193: 2153: 2147: 2145: 2141: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2083: 2069: 2065: 2047: 1992: 1990: 1983: 1974: 1972: 1961: 1951: 1945: 1941: 1931: 1930: 1927: 1904: 1899: 1866: 1845: 1841: 1816: 1812: 1805: 1799: 1795: 1794: 1765:direct edits 1764: 1746: 1739: 1738: 1730: 1672: 1669: 1477: 1413:not removing 1412: 1373: 1334:edit warring 1329: 1323: 1296:indivudials. 1288: 1259: 1203: 1163:— Preceding 1032: 1025: 1010: 999: 991: 987: 975: 964: 928: 887: 825: 816: 746: 701:third option 677: 647: 643: 639: 635: 625: 591: 585: 558: 551:edit warring 546: 540: 462: 451: 434: 417: 397: 391: 368: 360: 358: 306:good article 305: 283: 276: 268: 260: 253: 200: 156: 130: 106: 95: 86:The article 85: 50: 42: 26: 25: 23: 20:Greetings... 15: 2973:for making 2883:WP:HOUNDING 2878:Sciences Po 2601:voting page 2488:voting page 2412:voting page 2112:different. 1954:Sciences Po 1846:problematic 1827:we do, see 1429:Sciences Po 1079:Sciences Po 1028:Sciences Po 560:Sciences Po 298:Animalparty 263:Animalparty 256:Kume affair 53:Tassie Talk 3861:this one. 3842:Everyone's 3728:"Froggish" 3698:Ritchie333 3482:Asterix757 3431:situation. 3367:sanction). 3208:says that 2857:Ad hominem 2708:ANI notice 2639:for more. 2585:topic bans 2472:topic bans 2396:topic bans 2254:talk page 1679:EdJohnston 1625:EdJohnston 1605:EdJohnston 1526:EdJohnston 1524:. Thanks, 1474:ANI notice 1449:EdJohnston 1419:Mr rnddude 1407:EdJohnston 1392:EdJohnston 1285:EdJohnston 1271:EdJohnston 1120:Sunasuttuq 992:References 846:Science Po 801:. Cheers, 654:Science Po 618:Sunasuttuq 517:Sunasuttuq 505:WP:CANVASS 439:for more. 383:topic bans 221:topic bans 111:or ask at 45:Aaroncrick 3921:Guy Macon 3874:Guy Macon 3800:Guy Macon 3784:Guy Macon 3763:Nil Einne 3755:WP:OUTING 3720:"apeshit" 3501:Guy Macon 3473:Guy Macon 3399:Guy Macon 3395:Nil Einne 3380:Guy Macon 3328:Nil Einne 3248:Guy Macon 3234:Guy Macon 2796:Nil Einne 2695:Guy Macon 2635:See also 2581:site bans 2520:has been 2468:site bans 2392:site bans 2165:Wikibreak 1986:this edit 1798:edits to 1761:topic-ban 1727:Topic ban 1638:have been 1491:Aspersion 1349:consensus 1347:and seek 1036:Kautilya3 981:WP:WEIGHT 971:WP:WEIGHT 920:WP:WEIGHT 910:Kautilya3 894:Kautilya3 598:consensus 596:and seek 485:Kautilya3 469:Kautilya3 379:site bans 279:talk page 217:site bans 90:has been 3689:|reason= 2994:|reason= 2971:48 hours 2870:CSECTION 2737:contribs 2729:Delfield 2725:unsigned 2663:Delfield 2530:Frietjes 2300:Best, -- 2212:Launebee 2148:strongly 2084:strongly 2046:". S/he 1817:directly 1800:articles 1673:mistaken 1664:Launebee 1649:Launebee 1372:|reason= 1330:72 hours 1189:Launebee 1177:contribs 1169:Launebee 1165:unsigned 1085:Launebee 1077:and not 584:|reason= 547:24 hours 174:1241edit 124:prod blp 3687:unblock 3661:blocked 3360:health. 3357:WP:TPOC 3353:WP:TPOC 2992:unblock 2966:blocked 2608:NoACEMM 2220:Andrewa 2218:above. 2170:Andrewa 2127:Correct 2089:Andrewa 1997:Andrewa 1936:Andrewa 1911:Andrewa 1850:Andrewa 1823:indeed. 1813:extreme 1510:WP:SOCK 1370:unblock 1325:blocked 1262:WP:RFPP 1240:history 1147:WP:AN/I 967:WP:NPOV 916:WP:NPOV 772:point 4 582:unblock 542:blocked 528:Blocked 3671:WP:ANI 3507:, and 3342:WP:AGF 3254:and a 3177:will. 3148:Drmies 3135:Drmies 3102:Drmies 3087:Drmies 3054:Drmies 3039:Drmies 3018:Drmies 3002:Drmies 2343:Kadbzh 2326:Kadbzh 2140:As to 2104:, and 1796:direct 1771:for a 1769:asking 1740:bd2412 1596:Hello 1538:Hello 1496:Hello 1266:WP:3RR 922:, and 852:; for 821:WP:SPI 799:WP:RFC 795:WP:DRN 742:WP:RFC 738:WP:DRN 465:WP:ANI 207:. The 159:Ss1241 102:source 2133:(and 2082:So I 2066:Agree 1975:after 1842:Agree 1425:there 1289:a lot 1248:watch 1244:links 1151:WP:DR 977:NeilN 924:WP:RS 840:NeilN 765:the 761:NeilN 740:or a 692:NeilN 629:NeilN 503:Read 139:Mufka 129:tag. 3935:talk 3925:EEng 3923:and 3878:talk 3819:talk 3788:talk 3767:talk 3743:talk 3676:. 3674:here 3606:Boob 3597:talk 3589:also 3571:EEng 3526:talk 3509:EEng 3462:EEng 3440:talk 3397:and 3384:talk 3332:talk 3310:talk 3238:talk 3218:talk 3183:talk 3139:talk 3124:talk 3091:talk 3074:talk 3043:talk 3028:talk 3006:talk 2939:talk 2912:talk 2800:talk 2733:talk 2699:talk 2667:talk 2618:talk 2571:The 2534:talk 2497:talk 2458:The 2421:talk 2382:The 2347:talk 2330:talk 2306:talk 2288:and 2268:talk 2256:]. 2224:talk 2174:talk 2118:talk 2093:talk 2057:talk 2001:talk 1962:talk 1950:fake 1946:they 1942:they 1915:talk 1907:here 1882:talk 1863:TBAN 1854:talk 1785:talk 1711:talk 1689:talk 1653:talk 1580:talk 1530:talk 1462:talk 1438:talk 1396:talk 1332:for 1305:talk 1275:talk 1252:logs 1236:talk 1232:edit 1204:Neil 1173:talk 1100:talk 1055:talk 1040:talk 954:talk 944:and 929:Neil 898:talk 869:talk 826:Neil 817:here 807:talk 747:Neil 728:talk 678:Neil 675:. -- 662:talk 652:and 549:for 495:talk 473:talk 435:See 408:talk 369:The 331:talk 316:talk 241:talk 185:talk 179:. -- 163:talk 3896:Eng 3852:Eng 3715:. 3711:So 3695:. 3616:Eng 3587:is 3569:So 3559:Eng 3451:Eng 3268:you 3264:you 3060:We' 3000:. 2893:it. 2872:or 2843:Eng 2822:Eng 2048:did 1670:are 1293:SPA 1291:of 1129:ANI 797:or 608:. 294:Hi 201:Hi, 72:of 3937:) 3880:) 3872:-- 3821:) 3790:) 3782:-- 3769:) 3745:) 3693:}} 3685:{{ 3599:) 3581:is 3528:) 3442:) 3386:) 3378:-- 3334:) 3312:) 3240:) 3232:-- 3220:) 3185:) 3141:) 3126:) 3093:) 3085:. 3076:) 3045:) 3030:) 3008:) 2998:}} 2990:{{ 2981:. 2941:) 2914:) 2876:. 2874:RS 2866:SP 2802:) 2739:) 2735:• 2701:) 2669:) 2620:) 2610:}} 2606:{{ 2583:, 2536:) 2528:. 2499:) 2491:. 2470:, 2423:) 2415:. 2394:, 2349:) 2332:) 2308:) 2270:) 2226:) 2176:) 2146:I 2120:) 2095:) 2059:) 2003:) 1988:. 1964:) 1917:) 1884:) 1856:) 1831:). 1787:) 1713:) 1691:) 1655:) 1647:-- 1582:) 1532:) 1464:) 1456:? 1440:) 1398:) 1378:. 1376:}} 1368:{{ 1340:. 1307:) 1277:) 1250:| 1246:| 1242:| 1238:| 1234:| 1201:-- 1179:) 1175:• 1118:, 1114:, 1102:) 1094:. 1057:) 1042:) 969:, 956:) 918:, 900:) 871:) 863:. 848:, 809:) 730:) 699:A 664:) 616:, 612:, 588:}} 580:{{ 515:, 511:, 507:. 497:) 475:) 410:) 402:. 381:, 333:) 318:) 281:. 243:) 219:, 187:) 165:) 127:}} 121:{{ 57:) 3933:( 3927:: 3919:@ 3915:. 3908:. 3891:E 3876:( 3847:E 3817:( 3811:I 3802:: 3798:@ 3786:( 3765:( 3741:( 3611:E 3595:( 3554:E 3524:( 3515:. 3496:. 3475:: 3471:@ 3464:: 3460:@ 3438:( 3401:: 3393:@ 3382:( 3348:. 3330:( 3323:: 3319:@ 3308:( 3298:. 3288:. 3236:( 3216:( 3181:( 3170:. 3137:( 3122:( 3104:: 3100:@ 3089:( 3072:( 3056:: 3052:@ 3041:( 3026:( 3020:: 3016:@ 3004:( 2937:( 2910:( 2889:. 2838:E 2835:- 2817:E 2814:- 2798:( 2731:( 2697:( 2665:( 2616:( 2532:( 2495:( 2419:( 2345:( 2328:( 2304:( 2266:( 2222:( 2172:( 2116:( 2091:( 2072:? 2055:( 2034:. 2028:. 2022:. 2016:. 1999:( 1960:( 1938:: 1934:@ 1932:: 1913:( 1880:( 1852:( 1808:? 1783:( 1747:T 1709:( 1687:( 1681:: 1677:@ 1666:: 1662:@ 1651:( 1644:. 1627:: 1600:, 1578:( 1558:. 1528:( 1460:( 1451:: 1447:@ 1436:( 1421:: 1417:@ 1409:: 1405:@ 1394:( 1359:. 1303:( 1273:( 1254:) 1230:( 1206:N 1191:: 1187:@ 1171:( 1098:( 1087:: 1083:@ 1071:: 1067:@ 1053:( 1038:( 952:( 931:N 912:: 908:@ 896:( 867:( 842:: 838:@ 828:N 805:( 763:: 759:@ 749:N 726:( 694:: 690:@ 680:N 660:( 631:: 627:@ 590:. 493:( 487:: 483:@ 471:( 406:( 329:( 314:( 300:: 296:@ 289:. 273:? 239:( 183:( 161:( 49:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index