User talk:XLerate/Archive 1

1251:(in 1961 according to the article), I'm not aware it was called "Auckland University" during it's history. "Auckland University College" I left alone, I was only replacing ] and ] with ]. If I've mucked it up somewhere or used the wrong title, please let me know and I can take a look at repairing it. Otago, Waikato and now Auckland have been categorised (over 200 more alumni & faculty in the respective categories), I plan to do the remaining NZ universities in the next few days. Perhaps there need to be categories for University of NZ alumni & faculty, for pre-1961 graduates & staff, what do you think? 1635:” In order to validate the knowledge evolution maps of identified users in Knowledge (XXG), I need your help. I have generated a knowledge evolution map to denote your knowledge activities in Knowledge (XXG) according to your inputs including the creation and modification of contents in Knowledge (XXG), and I need you to validate whether the generated knowledge evolution map matches the knowledge that you perceive you own it. Could you please do me a favor? 1680: 1455: 611: 505: 31: 449: 262: 3283: 3223: 3163: 3102: 3040: 2824: 2763: 2702: 2641: 2585: 2529: 1988: 1572: 1023: 753: 560: 3363: 2976: 2915: 1792: 407:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. 364:. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well. 159: 2105:

the idea of a dab page is to make it as easy and straightforward as possible to locate the specific article, looking through the list for the desired country, not finding it, going to see also, next dab page, then the target isn't as good as having all six entries in the one place. So, sorry, but I

1647:

The deadline of my thesis defense is set by the end of June, 2008. There is no much time left for me to wrap up the thesis. If you can help me, please reply this message. I will send you the URL link of the first part once I receive your response. The completion of my thesis heavily relies much on

1639:

I will send you a URL link to a webpage on which your knowledge evolution map displays. Please assign the topic (concept) in the map to a certain cluster on the map according to the relationship between the topic and clusters in your cognition, or you can assign it to ‘none of above’ if there is no

694:

It's no problem, I'm happy to discuss it. I did look for a policy or guide on this specific point of names mixed with titles but didn't see anything, please let me know if you're aware of some documentation on this topic. George W. Bush has default sort set to "Bush, George W.", rather than "George

291:

status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Knowledge (XXG) (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases

2100:

I looked to the talk pages but missed the history. It doesn't bother me if the U.S. spelling redirects to the British or vice-versa, the related pages such as Ministry of Defence, Defence Minister, categories, all use the British spelling. Two dab pages for the same topic isn't sensible to me, the

2460:

Maybe, but that doesn't mean I can't create them in the first place, as you request above. And it certainly doesn't apply to the redlinks in articles. Honestly, I don't see what the objective is here. I was trying to create an article, with redirects to variations of the persons name and links on

188:

status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Knowledge (XXG) (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases

1246:

Hi dramatic, I've gone through and categorised all the faculty and alumni, where the article conclusively stated "was a lecturer" or "graduated from". Incidentally I was also replacing the colloquial "Auckland University" with the actual title "University of Auckland" (especially as there is the

1365: 2343:

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Knowledge (XXG) page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

2310:

2277:

855:. Note that there is no actual stub change in the edit, contrary to the summary you (or your AWB) left. I went ahead and reverted it but wanted to give you a head's-up on it, as it appears to have been a case of auto-editing gone wild. Feel free to leave me a talk message there or 683:

P.S. I am sorry if I came through as patronizing above. When doing a lot of minor and mostly very useful edits, as you obviously do, it is probably easy to stumble into something unfamiliar and make a mistake. Everything is revertible, so it is really no big deal. :-)

1926:. I tried the link you suggested to 'request changes' but none of the links take me directly to that function. Can you help further? I am keen to ensure that our business information is both correct, informative enough and of course 'in the spirit of wikipedia' :-) 1412:, but I assume your argument is that he does not have the right to do that as the image was taken in Google Earth where any image is owned by Google. Does this mean that the model without the background (hypothetically) would be okay (eg outisde of Google Earth)? 1433:

Xlerate thanks for your editing work. I am based at Dunedin Public Libraries and had the blessing of the Library Manager to use the website text. As the Library is the owner of the text I can't see where use of this public domain content would be a problem?

336:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 233:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 2162:

No I was working for a Dunedin company when it was published, and I moved overseas later in 1999. Pretty sure it was 1999 but may have been 1998. Absolutely certain it could not have been later unless it was recycled. ODT archives would have the proof.

2065:

I, of course, agree with the result of your changes. But there are only a couple of million of you, 20 million of us, 50(?) million Poms, but at least a couple of Hundred million of them. I expect that one of them will object and change it; I hope I'm

1207:

I see that you are making bot-assisted changes of "Auckland University" to "University of Auckland". I would suggest that in any article which says "X graduated from y in (year) z", then y should be whatever the institution was called at that time.

1945:

Just want to say thanks for the fabulous pic, that really is something. But i just want to ask where were you when you took the pic, looks like a place that is pretty unaccessible to the public unless you work at the airport. Can you help me out?

673:

as "W., George Bush"), and I also undid another couple of similar edits of yours, but I don't particularly feel like going through your contributions systematically. Please backtrack your edits and undo them yourself in applicable cases.

808:

are identified as vandalism but sadly they can't be reverted. Other users and I have really worked hard on that article and now it is ruined If you could please some how revert your edits it'll be wonderful,Hope you understand.Thanx

1546:

Certainly it was overdue for some attention, especially being top importance to WPNZ, thanks for going to the trouble of point it out. I think the assessment can be somewhat subjective, may differ significantly between editors.

1533:

The assessment of articles is rather inconsistent, and sometimes I think we're too hard on articles, but when an article seems to be accumulating tags without editors making an effort to clean them up, then something has to be

925:

Whoops ... you're right about the stub. That one slipped my attention. I've no problem with that edit. As for the deletion of the town link, I disagree, though not strenuously enough to revert. Sorry for the inconvenience.

1767:

Thank you! That's cheered me up considerably (especially since at the moment I'm trying to cope with some edits made by an editor who caused me strife in real life a couple of years ago). It's nice to feel appreciated!

829:. I have reverted the article to the edit I did, it looks ok now. There were some small edits afterwards, I'll take a look and see if some additional repairs are needed. If the vandalism continues you can request 2377:

I have now withdrawn the speedy tags and changed the relevant pages to redirects. Next time you create a new article, please don't create wikilinks and redirect pages until the parent article is ready. Thanks,

2124:

No need to apologise - you make some good points. Although I'm not completely sure, I think I agree with most of what you say. If I have anything useful to add, will do so later. Thanks for the reply. Cheers,

900:

There are 2 topics regarding this edit. Firstly I deleted an internal link duplicated in the preceeding sentence. It's really not necessary to repeat the same link in such close promixity, please see

3305: 916:

for the assessment guideline I use. I feel the repeated link really needs to go, the stub tag is more subjective, if you want to leave it on I suggest putting a more specific one, like company stub.

699:

has nothing set, so reverts to the title (as opposed to Windsor, Elizabeth). Thanks for pointing it out, this looks to be the precedent for royalty, so I'll leave the names with titles as they are.

2359:

I suggest you create a main page first, then worry about redirect pages. At the moment, it's a mess with numerous pages all going nowhere. So, no, I won't remove the speedy tags for now. Regards,

332:

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1288:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

1122:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

584:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

229:

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

537:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any 3395:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 3008:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 2947:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1824:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1712:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 1487:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 643:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 2191:

The Dunedin Public Libraries website catalog has a newspaper headlines search if that helps, this is how I found that reference (? vertical search on Dunedin companies / Speights).

1181:

Feel free to change the shields. With the software I've got I can only make them in gif, jpg or png, but you're right that svg would be better. Regard my ones as "spacefillers".

3391: