1547:
the
Kambojas and the Yadavas are Kshatriya groups, then so are the Rajputs, Jats, Khatris, Tarkhans et al. I did not create a category entitled "Kshatriya groups" in the first place because I knew I was treading on soft ground. All the above mentioned castes claim Kshatriya status. But we all know, how disputable these claims are. The rigmarole that is the Varna System is known to us all. For example, the Jats, who in the Vedic and Mythological periods were workers should be placed in the Shudra Category under the Varna System. But many Jats clans consider themselves the equal and perhaps the superior of Rajputs as adhrents of Kshatriya Dharma. My own caste, the Khatris and related groups such as Aroras claim Kshatriya status. But we have seen on the Khatri page as to what became of that claim. Ahirs, Gujjars and Yadavs are considered to be OBCs in most Indian states inspite of their being the descendants of ancient Abhiras, Gurjaras and Yadus. There is a controversy raging on the Yadav page presently if I am not wrong, on the status of the caste. Taking all these points into consideration and being aware of the fact that there are users (say Sanjay Mohan and Holywarrior, who have caused great disputes on various caste pages, I proposed categories such as "Kambojs and related groups" (Kamboj, Kamboja, Kamboh and Khasa) and "Gujjars and realted groups" (Ahirs, Gujjars, Dhangars and Bakarwals). But Satbir Singh and another user named Sze cavalry01 objected to it. They returned to "Ancient Kshatriya Tribes". I did a little compromise by making it "Ancient Warrior Tribes", which I later realised would also be POV. Therefore, I changed it to just "Ancient Tribes" - A completely unspeculative term.
1782:
feel attacked for it, and I'm very sorry that you do, especially if I've caused it in any way. I never meant for my comment to cause you to think that you were undermining
Esperanza or weren't wanted here, because that's simply not true. I was attempting to help and diffuse the situation, though it seems I've just made it worse. You have always been a model Esperanzian, going above and beyond the rest of us in recognizing quality editors and brining them some happiness. I am so sorry that you are leaving, and hope that you may reconsider. And if not reconsider, at least except my most humble apologies. Your friend always, --
277:
not a democratic government and is automatically suspect in all it's 'disseminated facts' *cough propaganda *cough. Pro-Hindutva am I? Maybe. But LKAdvaani here is equally biased if you look at his edit histories calmly and objectively. His disturbing screed against hindus (NOT hindutva people, ALL Hindus) in various talk pages, combined with his glaringly Hindu userid, indicates either a level of personal dichotomy that borders on schizophrenia, or a deep loathing for all things Indian. What about HIS BIAS? Am I not a counterbalance to his quasi-communist ravings?
1501:
have to interact through. Incivility sets off chain reactions of mistrust, not to mention huge amounts of wasted time and effort in RfC's. Any admin should know not to be transparent with their thoughts in their admin tasks, even if people are really acting stupid. There is no doubt it takes more skill and thought to be civil ALL the time, but as admins they should, and need, to have the experience and maturity to achieve such a task. Thanks for your thougts in the RfA.
161:. At the same time it is quite possible that he was using still another sockpuppet, which was blocked and his IP was automatically blocke when he tried to edit from blocked account. If this is the case, good for him. I am not aware of any other possibilities. On the other hand, I don'd do much blocking and I see that blocking/unblocking tool changed. In particular, I don't quite understand the meaning of the
2037:
552:
where the anti-Hindu propaganda begins, and I merely chose to contest that. The reason why I got angry was the clear bias that many admins (not binguyen) showed in favor of muslims like this Anwar saadat chap and
Christian Fundamentalists like Wikisceptic. If you're impartial and fair like Binguyen has been (for the most part anyway) there won;t be problems even with punitive measures.(
1049:
95:
prior warning and for a relatively mild case is too harsh. He should first be warned for personal attacks and the first block should be shorter. Please point me to the policy that justifies a weeklong block without prior warning. Especially since in many other cases, users weren't blocked for worse PA's even after warnings
1752:
kind, committed user. I for one am sorry to see that you thought it best to leave
Esperanza, and I would love to see you back, if or when you feel you would want to come back. And if you do start up a project with the ideas about protection and help you outlined on the talk page, I would be glad to help you with it.
517:
on the grounds that Bose is a newbie, and I have to say I disagree strongly. This editor does not need to be gently introduced to protocol, he needs no mentoring; he knows exactly what he is doing and thinks he can get away with it. Two different problems, two different approaches, and yours was correct.
1397:
talk page... ;-)): No problem. I just thought I'd remind you. I always just double check before doing stuff like that, you know... just in case. But hey, anything is better than nothing which is what we get every now and again. Perhaps I'm slightly to blame, as I checked a bunch and didn't comment on
1755:
I really do look up to editors like you, those who are so committed and good at making this project better, and I really hope that you know that I don't think you were trying to push POV, as I hope you know I wasn't. We were just both being bold in our edits, and had conflicting views. I am sorry if
1500:
I also opposed that RfA which took a lot of time to consider. Sean is obviously a very able admin. But at the end of the day the civility issues are the ones that really hurt wikipedia. There is often misscommunication without incivility, not really surprising given the no body language interface we
867:
Hi. Just wanted to point out that anti-Hindu elements have been citing human rights watch reports in the 2002 Gujarat
Violence article. Human Rights watch is a controvertial org that has been accused of anti-semitism and biased portrayal against USA and Israel in favor of muslim countries (see their
686:
I'm assuming this is your ip above, so if I tell someone that he is seeing terrorists on the net, that is religious inflammation and incitement ? Sarcasm I buy but religous inflammation and incitement ? The other person can make put "pick up a gun and fight against
Christian Missionaries and islamic
564:
There is no room for anger on
Knowledge (XXG).Secondly, I believe your sarcasm will not be easily digested by whoever you target.May I remind you that you have shown much more froth at mouth than the people of the certain religion of peace and I suspect certain contributors who have supported you in
516:
Thanks for the reply, and I hope you're back soon. I just wanted to say that I was not in any way comparing the length of disbarring handed out to
Subhash Bose and Wikiskeptic, as I dont know anything about the latter's case. Also, I read the various posts above from other admins criticising the ban
1781:
Blnguyen, my friend, I'm so sorry if I've caused you to leave
Esperanza! (A fat lot of good I'm doing as AG so far). It was never my intention to alienate you, and I never felt like I was being undermined - nor should it have mattered anyway! You were letting us know your opinion, and should not
1546:
The Varna System is a topic subject to a lot of controversy and dispute. I have been noticing this in recent weeks. Pages such as Khatri, Rajput, Kayastha and
Bhumihar have been vandalised because many people don't agree with the Varna status of these groups. If the Ahirs, the Gujjars, the Khasaa,
551:
I have kept all criticisms of it's Brahministic supremacy while removed ridiculous claims of anti-feminism (bah! Feminism is a modern movement and doesn't apply in this context) or racism (racism is a European ideology, what it was was ethnocentric which is different from racism). These details are
335:
The death toll of Godhra was 3000 terrorist jihadis and their sympathizers. Big difference,see? On, and I know that muslims find loyal allies in left wing liberals (like the organizations above) and self-hating hindus(like you, maybe). Like I said, you may post the link if you wish, but then I have
276:
Bear in mind that LKAdvani here uses CENSORSHIP of the STALINIST UPA government as a justification for retaliating against my own humble self. Why should wikipedia give a rat's rear-end whether the Indian government bans a website or not? eh? A government that practices censorship of FREE-SPEECH is
1923:
Hi Blnguyen, I just saw that you had left Esperanza. :( I missed your presence most at the Barnstar Brigade, where you were by far the leading member in terms of contributions to the project. I just wanted to say that I'm really sorry to see you go, and although I cannot convince you to come back,
1751:
Blnguyen, I was really sorry to see your comments on the esperanza talk page (i'm posting here in case you wish to leave quitley, as Redvers did a while back). I know that on the talk page we disagreed, but that doens't mean that I don't have lots of respect for you and think that you're a great,
1539:
Since that day, a revert war has been on between the two of us. According to Satbir, these groups such as the Ahirs (the ancient Abhiras), the Gujjars (Gurjaras), the Khas (the Khasas), the Kamboj (Kambojas) and Yadav (Yadavas) are ancient Kshatriya tribes mentioned in a number of ancient Sanskrit
760:"Be" like "saala" or "saale" is an insult if used with someone you do not personally know. Between friends it might not be seen as an insult, but to say it to someone you do not know is an insult. You do not say "be" to people in office, or on the street, unless you are looking to pick up a fight.
315:
Pat comes Subhash with the change: The United Nations International Human Rights Commission has not yet fully recognized the Gujarat riots as a human rights issue. However, campaigns to recognize it have been made by Islamist organizations like the world muslim congress demanding expediency in the
1524:
I created a template called Castes and Tribes of the Punjab with a view to studying the caste and tribal groups that exist in what was the ancient Punjab region (Punjab (Pakistan), Punjab (India), Haryana and Himachal Pradesh). My intention, unlike any Ibbetsons, Todds or Cunninghams was to study
1451:
I am hardly the one adding commercial links in "Toronto." In fact, I have been the one EDITING them out. Many others have posted links to very commercial sites--while they are travel sites, they are aimed at getting money only, nonetheless. I have added other websites which are not ad-based, with
631:
I have listed the times when the user has insulted me, he continues to make accusations, and I am responding to a comment he has made to me on his talk page. So what is the issue with that ? I also would like to know what action would be taken against User Subhash Bose now that you know he is the
111:
for one week. It usually not done so with new users. People have different habits before joining wikipedia. I suggest you to reblock him for a shorter term, unless you have specific reasons for long block. (e.g., a suspected sockpuppet. Simply very strong language is not a valid reason: different
70:
I've seen Subhash Bose in a number of other articles and while he may seem POV-Pushing at first, he has the potential to become a good Wikipedian. He has a good grasp of things happening in India and doesn't hold the "Get out of this page if you are anti-Hindu" or something POV even though I have
1018:
I saw that your name on the Indian wikiprojects. Your userpage said you knew vietnamese. So I thought I'd ask if you could translate since it was sort of Indian and vietnamese related. If there are any other Hindu temples in Vietnam articles, please translate the. If you want, you could also
94:
with this user's personal attacks and his userpage, a user must be warned before being blocked. Looking at his talkpage, I see he wasn't warned, and the dispute resolution process wasn't followed. The incident should rather be reported first at WP:PAIN. I think a weeklong first block without any
884:
Please mention specifically what part of my typings can be interpreted as 'unnecessarily confrontational'. You must understand that a certain measure of rhetoric and hyperbole are standard methods of discourse among Indians (long story why, probably something to do with the weather, or maybe we
696:
Your complaint is not valid as Subhash has already been blocked for a week for his userpage and attacks committed on various talk pages. I have only asked you to stop making sarcastic retorts and inflammatory comments and you have not yet been sanctioned because quite clearly your behaiviour is
1535:
Brahmin groups. Dalit groups. Jat clans. Khatris and other groups. Rajput clans. Shaikhs and other groups. Tarkhans and other groups. Others (groups to which i could not attribute any specific status). In the last (Others), I also included groups such as Kamboj, Khasa, Ahir and Gujjar.
1203:
I'm looking into it. Sorry, seems like I've caught myself into a moderation of a messy personal attack campaign on some Indian religious articles, I was mentioned in a bogus arbitration case (though not named as a party), and also had to resign from Esperanza, and reply to a complaint as to my
124:
I reviewed the uncivility of user:Subhash bose and I must say that his attacks are very mild in comparison what I've seen in wikipedia. Of course, they are inacceptable, but I think the user must be mentored, rather than blocked. I think he may be given another chance, with heavy warning. I am
600:
Wow I stumbled on this discussion and found it interesting. Weasel wordings? Muslim scholars (of that age) stated that Babar destroyed the Ram Mandirs and these are primary sources to the devastation. That is NPOV, not the showdowns and controversy a certain couple users make with Mr.
526:
Thanks for your support, especially on my stance against religious and personal attacks. I'm not stressed by holding personal attackers to account, it's mainly the deletion backlog. And I don't think anybody needs to be reminded about basic courtesy and decency towards other users.
504:. He also tends to remove references and hyperlinks that do not agree with whatever POV he wishes to push at the time. Its not such a problem, because I think he basically is capable of understanding what NPOV actually is, he just acts out a lot of anger in the way he edits.
265:
He has made a POV statement against Teesta Setalvad and therefore trying to hide away the truth I have exposed through the Supreme court judgement in this affair. Secondly, he is removing the pamphlet - discussed in Indian parliament as well as by the HRights groups.
241:
Personally, I'm not so convinced that blogs should be cited at all, but as I said before, I was here mainly to make the debate civilised, rather than mediate POV as I am ignorant towards Hindu theology as well ignorant towards the politics of religion in India.
328:
There has been an explicit use of fowl language towards Muslims - many talk pages like the one below using (Netaji) Login --Note that "Netaji" and "Subahsh Bose" or "Subhash Chandra" are the variants of the name of Indian freedom fighter Subhash Chandra Bose.
292:
If User Subhash is not highly right wing POVed.His knowledge of the topics he is editing is perverted and of the type usually called as misinformation - some call it ignorance and an encyclopoedia in such hand s will be disastrous for Knowledge (XXG).
1550:
However, Satbir Singh does not agree. He calls it a "gross suppression of known historical facts", "a crime against history" and "a political agenda" and has termed me a "Vandal". I have put forward my points. But both of us are yet to agree.
750:
is not the most respectful way to address a person but is not an abuse either. In case you are looking for some other translation, I will be glad to help. Regarding your comments on my talk page, pls give me some time. I will surely answer --
1152:
355:
I also request you to watch Anwar saadat's edits of my userpage carefully. His adding the tag was ok, but he vandalized my page by removing all other content. I have reverted (keeping the tags), bit he will surely vandalize again.
546:
propaganda films are welcome to do so, even when it involves legitimate criticism. Unlike people of a certain 'religion of peace' we don't froth in the mouth when faced with legitimate criticism. If you notice my recent edit of
223:
sovereignty or integrity of India security of the state friendly relations with foreign states and public order preventing incitement to commissioning of any cognisable offences.He has been testing patience of many Wikiauthors
1713:
Hello there, I'm curious as to why you deleted the Connecticut state seal. It is clearly public domain since it is over 400 years old. It seems a bit hostile to delete an image instead of simply changing the licence.
642:
Does he not continue to exist as User Subhash Bose ? The wind up was less offensive than me being called blind. Also Subhash Bose has got blocked for Shiv Sena revert war, what of his puppetry, does that not get any
336:
evidence to balance it out with an endless litany of muslim genocides and atrocities in Gujarat itself. The truth about Islam is something you muslim-lovers don't want on wikipedia. Netaji 16:39, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
1655:, I see that you have inserted a bundle of dates in U.S. format into an article where they are inappropriate, France being one of the vast majority of countries that is not the U.S. and does not use this format. --
1685:
I just realised I used the wrong button (revert vandal instead rollback). If you check the warning I left in the anon's page, I chose {{subst:joke}} which is more adequate of course. Thanks for letting me know.
1528:
I started with a few groups. But soon enough the groups began to increase. For the sake of brevity, I grouped them under Categories. As the template evolved, I learnt not to name any category speculatively.
1246:
However, a few things to keep in mind... items must come from articles that are sourced, not stubs, and newer than 5 days old. A few of the items you chose do not meet that criteria. You may want to see
1984:. I'm happy that so many people have put faith in my abilities as an admin and promise to use the tools wisely and do my best not to let you down. If I ever may be of assistance, just leave a note on
1816:
11:54, 21 July 2006 (UTC) There is only one kind of Islam. The kind that blows things up. Netaji 12:52, 21 July 2006 (UTC- This is on my and his own talk page, so is this not a "religious wind up ?"
1525:
these groups from a purely anthropological perspective sans any controversy so that people visiting this portal would get to know about the huge mosaic that my province (I am a Punjabi) is.
47:
Note to readers: This is not the source of my wiki-stress, but rather the deletion backlog, which is endlessly long and mindnumbingly boring. This dispute is rather interesting and complex.
816:
128.83.131.125 has edited the page again yesterday.Subhash Bose He has been proving difficult to manage.Inserts subtle POV in support of the Gujarat Chief Minsiter and Hindutva champions.
712:
I have said sarcasm part is valid, ( and if you have to make comparisons it is still a lot less inflammatory than kya karega be). But where is the "religious" in the wind up or incitement?
822:
This user adds words that seem to precipitate or divert attention from the main topic and cites blogs and Hindutva think tanks to support it and in most cases leaves a general statement,
1255:
for more specific requirements. Again, thank you for at least trying to help. There are plenty that don't even bother trying. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask. Thanks. --
325:
Encyclopaedia under such perverted mind - does not add value to wikipedia.Subhash should better avoid these words as they give him away from any login - zeitgeist,adhominem,mein freund.
1268:
LV, Blnguyen has updated quite a few times before IIRC... I've been quite impressed with some of his selections in the past. Agree with your comments about general principles though. ++
309:
Now user 62. something changed it to read: The United Nations International Human Rights Commission has recognized the Gujarat riots as a human rights issue adding links to UN articles
1069:
667:
I'm waiting for feedback. People are often hesitant when checkuser is not conclusive. Also I don't see how being called blind is worse than religious inflammation and incitement.
1554:
I have fighting a revert war with him for almost a week now. Have a look at the template's history page and Satbir Singh's talk page to get a complete idea of the whole fracas.
413:
1669:
Nothing to apologize for :) Just trying to help out with janitorial work now that I've been handed a mop :) Anyway, I used the simpler method of checking protections :) --
1557:
This fight has become downright silly. I surely don't expect myself to spend my time, money and energy on such a silly matter. And I am sure neither does the other party.
112:
cultures have different tolerance to words; it is a matter of education of new users, rather than punishing them. Long blocks are for persisting violators). Thank you, `'
162:
1081:
1497:
Just saw your post on the Sean Black RfA. Quite impressive self reflection. Anyone that knows their own faults is worth ten of those that know it all. Good stuff.
1225:
you forgot to update the refresh clock on your last update to DYK I think. I have tried to fix it by hand Also, we need to talk, try to catch me on IM sometime... ++
565:
your suspension have done an equal damage to the articles by introducing Weasel wordings in the articles on Hindutva,Ram Janmabhoomi,Babri Masjid and Gujarat riots.
491:
Hi: I noticed that on the Administrator's Noticeboard you said that you had noticed that Subhash Bose has not made any pronounced POV edits. I would direct you to
1835:
1578:
1187:
819:
If you read articles from the Indian and international media - they all point to the involvement of the Gujarat government in killings of innocent civilians.
1127:
1112:
1971:
1947:
217:
Please have a look on the comments - "Pakistani propoganda ...." Anything not corresponding to his personal pro Hindutva POV ..he feels free to remove.
1310:
I think he meant don't even bother to try to update DYK... nothing about articles. just guessing though. Your articles are cool, no worries there. ++
885:
picked it up from the Persians, dunno exactly). Just look at the hyperbole in the dialogue of a typical Hindi movie and you'll see for yourself...
1756:
I was the main cause for you leaving, because Esperanza needs good, caring editors like you, and more importantly, I think you're a good person.
1960:
1063:
934:
received an indef. block (rightly so). One of his actions today was to place a long anti-semetic polemic on the user page of his sock puppet
71:
seen him get agitated because of some anti-Hindutva edits. Perhaps he just needs encouragement and needs to learnt to conform to Wikipolicy.
1518:
Dear Sir, I am asking your opinion on this festering dispute that has developed between myself and Satbir Singh since the past few days.
542:
I acted out of anger because I AM angry. Nonetheless, those who wish to add edits that don't defame and denigrate hindus in the style of
1463:
Hi Blnguyen, the current link to the news story on your userpage asks for a password. Here's a better and more prominent daily's link
838:
372:
306:
Here he adds: The United Nations International Human Rights Commission has not recognized the Gujarat riots as a human rights issue.
1058:
1048:
1036:
495:, which I have stopped editing precisely because of his constant POV-pushing and unpleasantness on the talk page. In particular,
1252:
322:
Removed a redundant link. Oh, and to 62.189.60.30, get a login. That way the NSA can know which school you plan to bomb next
917:
Thanks for letting know, its as if I'm trying to get one ahead of snotty and i@n and they then come in and clean up :)
1862:, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on
1536:
However, Satbir Singh separated them and bunched them under a new category called "Surviving Ancient Kshatriya Tribes".
988:
659:
138:
OK, although I guess I have very harsh standards (relatively), and I intend to enforce them when I come across them.
1422:
Nice article - I can see a fair bit of work in that. I'll see if I can find a PD photo unless you add one first. --
723:
Possibly not many people know this, but I actually don't know any Indian languages. So you might want to translate.
198:
Well, the sock is suspect but it is probably him; very likely according to the RFCU. So I blocked the IP for a week.
1863:
1089:
894:
Replied on your talk page. Implying another user to be celebrating a terrorist attacks is what I was referring to..
1587:
1319:
1277:
1234:
1408:
1345:
1261:
1117:
1094:
1763:
1687:
2015:
1560:
Therefore, I urge you to have a look at the whole matter. Whatever is you opinion would be agreeable to me.
1436:
Don't sweat over it - it was only an idle thought (which most of mine are BTW). Whenever you're ready. --
826:
647:
360:
1834:
1786:
834:
368:
17:
1850:
1737:
1483:
1211:
1008:
971:
901:
858:
791:
730:
704:
687:
fundamentalists" on his user page and I get to be the one doing religious infalmmation and incitement ?
673:
534:
492:
423:
388:
249:
205:
145:
54:
938:(that also has an indef block). Can we replace it with an indef block box? It's copyvio if that helps
830:
1339:
Yes, yes, yes. I meant some admins don't bother even trying to update DYK. Sorry for the confusion. --
433:
36:
1615:
1595:
1455:
Please be careful with your comments, and learn to look at the history of others before accusing me.
1295:
543:
481:
466:
452:
82:
1732:
1633:
1619:
1478:
1403:
1340:
1256:
1206:
1074:
1024:
1003:
896:
853:
786:
725:
699:
529:
418:
383:
244:
200:
140:
49:
1505:
1467:
1173:
1156:
1140:
992:
918:
774:
752:
169:
129:
116:
2005:
770:
311:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2002_Gujarat_violence&diff=61353881&oldid=61353537
302:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2002_Gujarat_violence&diff=61349527&oldid=61286591
215:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2002_Gujarat_violence&diff=64644199&oldid=64626162
1985:
935:
886:
869:
553:
437:
402:
364:
349:
278:
108:
64:
40:
28:
1464:
848:
220:
Some of the sites cited frequently by this user has been banned in India in the interest of:
1924:
the door is of course always open. Anyway, I hope this note finds you well. All the best --
967:
953:
655:
602:
1997:
1978:
1248:
949:
186:
I got this message after a recent edit.I think it is self evident what this chap is up to.
1931:
1907:
1893:
1722:
1656:
1618:
is doing it. I have reverted it twice. It is a sockpuppet of the first one. Please help.--
1592:
1584:
1564:
1372:
1302:
1104:
931:
518:
505:
477:
462:
448:
73:
1937:
1910:
1896:
1880:
1820:
1791:
1771:
1740:
1724:
1703:
1673:
1659:
1638:
1624:
1603:
1567:
1508:
1486:
1470:
1440:
1430:
1410:
1375:
1347:
1322:
1305:
1280:
1263:
1237:
1214:
1197:
1176:
1159:
1143:
1011:
995:
975:
956:
921:
904:
889:
872:
861:
794:
777:
764:
755:
733:
716:
707:
691:
676:
636:
606:
582:
556:
537:
521:
508:
485:
470:
456:
426:
405:
391:
343:
281:
270:
252:
235:
208:
192:
172:
148:
132:
119:
102:
57:
1959:
1543:
My own personal opinion is that all this is true. However, some points must be noted:
981:
1768:
1760:
1696:
1679:
1502:
1427:
1315:
1273:
1230:
579:
267:
232:
189:
166:
126:
113:
401:
I request you to look into this, given your strong stance against personal attacks.(
227:
1992:
1943:
1857:
1783:
1670:
1416:
399:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Special:Contributions&target=87.74.46.193
340:
2036:
1817:
1813:
1402:
take them. Oh well. I'll try and be more helpful in the future. Thanks again. --
761:
713:
688:
651:
633:
625:
548:
32:
461:
Okay. I'll put a word in Admin noticeboard so that the others will also see it
1926:
1715:
1369:
1299:
99:
1193:
Blnguyen, I wondered what you thought of my suggestion above. Be honest. --
1873:
1108:— a portal linking to key Hinduism-related articles, images, and categories
939:
88:
397:
The following user has violated 3RR rule and engaged in personal attacks:
1890:
Just keeping you updated, since you've taken an interest in this editor:
1437:
1423:
1311:
1269:
1226:
1194:
259:
Please see the changes made by Subhash which he calls as "Summarized it"
182:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Lkadvani&redirect=no
1841:
966:
Thanks, Blnguyen...I saw that after I posted the 3RR template. Cheers.
868:
article on wikipedia). Thus, hrw is a POV site that must be qualified.
2017:
1292:
1020:
339:
and the use of "be" in Hindi is similar to provoking one to fight.
1098:
1001:
I will try to. I'll possibly need dictionary help for this one....
1845:
1614:
I see that you blocked AmericanBeauty2 for afd disruption. Now
2025:
1577:
revert war. Please discuss changes and reach consensus on the
2014:
NOTE: This message has been encrypted with the sophisticated
1730:
I guess I was trying too hard to clear the backlogs. Sorry.
1243:
Thank you for being bold and taking a stab at updating DYK.
1047:
27:
All matters relating to religious disputes involving Users
2024:
Ability to decipher it indicates a properly functioning
1452:
information promoting the city in a non-commercial way.
414:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for checkuser/Case/Anwar saadat
1905:
1891:
1809:
1805:
1652:
1291:"Don't even bother"? Come now, some of us are writing
1244:
945:
502:
499:
496:
444:
398:
310:
301:
263:
214:
181:
158:
96:
87:
07:27, 7 July 2006 (UTC) You have blocked another user
1966:
Thank you for contributing the impressive the pile of
1573:
I have, as of now, protected the page to prevent this
697:
better. Your complaint of victimization is not valid.
769:
Yes I agree with Haphar on that. It is certainly not
1085:— contains the latest Hinduism-related announcements
1389:To Blnguyen (what a concept: something directed at
1172:
Nice work on the translation. Interesting stuff!--
165:: Pusyamitra did edit after the indicated date. `'
319:And take a look at what he writes to the user 62.
332:Here he calls the dead in Gujarat as terrorists:
228:http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/5194172.stm
1030:
125:unblocking him, but will watch his behavior. `'
1188:Talk:Australian Olympic medalists in Swimming
812:Known sockpuppet still on Gujarat Riots page1
8:
2010:-on-demand admin wishes you happy editing!
1829:
1854:was updated with a fact from the article
991:]] to English for the my son article? --
1521:The facts of the matter are like this:
1976:, which passed with a final tally of
1759:Your hopeful future ally and friend,
1155:has been setup if you want to join.--
7:
1125:For more links, go to the project's
1062:— a collaborative effort to improve
784:Well, he's already gone for 7 days.
416:). He has been blocked for a month.
1804:Do these not qualify as wind up's ?
1459:Indian media link on your userpage
1153:Indian military history task force
1097:who have identified themselves as
987:Can you translate the Veitnamese[[
950:Knowledge (XXG) is not free speech
24:
2035:
1958:
1833:
1368:Oh, but I am an admin too ;) --
1953:
1514:Castes and Tribes of the Punjab
1398:the suggestions page... I just
738:If you want the translation of
952:and all that jazz... Thanks,
157:I am afraid you are mistaken:
1:
1864:the "Did you know?" talk page
944:I'm contacting you since you
1583:May the Force be with you!
1027:could also use an expansion.
1532:The final categories were:
1447:Commercial Links in Toronto
1204:comment on an RfA. Thanks,
1120:with a more specific scopes
851:will be conducted. Thanks,
159:he could edit after unblock
90:because of WP:NPA. While I
2056:
1965:
1741:05:11, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
1221:updating the refresh clock
1177:05:59, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
1938:01:12, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
1911:19:35, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1897:18:56, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1881:17:49, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1821:20:32, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1792:16:50, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1772:11:13, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1725:14:42, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1704:07:25, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1674:06:39, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1660:06:04, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1639:06:05, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1625:06:04, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1604:04:46, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1598:($ |-| ŗ 3 $ |-| ţ |-|)
1568:04:21, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1509:03:28, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1487:02:44, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1471:17:13, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
1441:03:02, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1431:04:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
1411:00:41, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1376:21:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
1348:21:04, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
1323:18:48, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
1306:16:10, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
1281:14:50, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
1264:13:34, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
1238:11:49, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
1215:02:44, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1198:09:48, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
1160:03:38, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1144:03:32, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
1073:— a page for centralised
1012:02:44, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
996:09:01, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
976:07:04, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
957:05:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
922:04:31, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
905:02:44, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
890:01:30, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
873:11:14, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
862:02:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
849:CheckUser for sockpuppets
795:05:21, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
778:05:17, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
765:05:09, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
756:04:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
734:01:44, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
717:01:20, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
708:01:14, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
692:10:16, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
677:08:55, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
637:08:19, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
607:21:55, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
583:17:57, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
557:10:30, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
538:01:14, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
522:11:42, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
509:08:37, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
486:07:55, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
471:07:09, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
457:06:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
427:01:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
412:The IP is that of Anwar (
406:17:10, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
392:05:29, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
344:12:37, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
297:Take a look on the edits:
282:02:59, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
271:22:47, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
253:01:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
236:14:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
209:01:18, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
193:23:30, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
173:05:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
149:06:05, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
58:01:14, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
948:User:Jimjones05 today.
744:what are you going to do
476:Thanks, he deserves it.
133:17:58, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
120:17:26, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
103:11:48, 8 July 2006 (UTC)
1064:articles about Hinduism
1747:Esperanza with out you
1052:
163:pending autoblock here
18:User talk:YellowMonkey
1942:
1051:
493:2002 Gujarat violence
2027:optical sensor array
1616:User:Americanbeauty2
1579:template's talk page
1059:WikiProject Hinduism
1038:WikiProject Hinduism
1919:Sorry to hear it...
1128:navigation template
1025:Hinduism in Vietnam
989:vi:Thánh địa Mỹ Sơn
1053:
2043:
2042:
1870:
1869:
1632:Thanks so much.--
1600:
1137:
1136:
1090:Hindu Wikipedians
936:User:Jimjones0005
843:
829:comment added by
664:
650:comment added by
438:User:Subhash bose
377:
363:comment added by
350:User:Anwar saadat
109:User:Subhash bose
92:strongly disagree
65:User:Subhash bose
2047:
2039:
2031:
2028:
2020:
2008:
2002:
1995:
1988:
1981:
1980:0x0104/0x01/0x00
1974:
1962:
1954:
1934:
1929:
1878:
1837:
1830:
1789:
1766:
1719:
1709:Connecticut seal
1701:
1694:
1636:
1622:
1602:
1599:
1596:
1590:
1406:
1343:
1259:
1132:
1075:Hinduism-related
1070:Discussion board
1039:
1031:
879:Confrontational?
842:
823:
663:
644:
434:User:WikiSceptic
376:
357:
85:
79:
76:
2055:
2054:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2046:
2045:
2044:
2026:
2018:
2013:
2006:
1998:
1993:
1986:
1979:
1972:
1963:
1952:
1932:
1927:
1921:
1888:
1874:
1828:
1802:
1787:
1779:
1764:
1749:
1717:
1711:
1697:
1688:
1683:
1667:
1649:
1634:
1620:
1612:
1597:
1588:
1582:
1516:
1495:
1461:
1449:
1420:
1404:
1341:
1257:
1223:
1191:
1124:
1122:
1054:
1037:
985:
964:
932:User:Jimjones05
929:
915:
881:
824:
814:
645:
629:
544:Der Ewige Juden
441:
381:I'm well aware.
358:
353:
290:
83:
77:
74:
68:
44:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2053:
2051:
2041:
2040:
2033:
2023:
2011:
1991:
1970:s gathered on
1964:
1957:
1951:
1941:
1920:
1917:
1916:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1887:
1884:
1868:
1867:
1838:
1827:
1824:
1801:
1798:
1796:
1778:
1775:
1748:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1710:
1707:
1682:
1677:
1666:
1663:
1648:
1645:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1641:
1611:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1515:
1512:
1494:
1491:
1490:
1489:
1460:
1457:
1448:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1419:
1414:
1387:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1222:
1219:
1218:
1217:
1190:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1135:
1134:
1055:
1046:
1043:
1042:
1029:
1028:
1015:
1014:
984:
979:
963:
960:
928:
925:
914:
911:
910:
909:
908:
907:
880:
877:
876:
875:
865:
813:
810:
809:
808:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
800:
799:
798:
782:
781:
780:
721:
720:
719:
671:
670:
669:
668:
628:
623:
622:
621:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
614:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
489:
488:
447:worth a ban ?
440:
431:
430:
429:
395:
394:
352:
347:
299:
298:
289:
286:
285:
284:
261:
260:
256:
255:
212:
211:
180:
178:
177:
176:
175:
152:
151:
67:
62:
43:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2052:
2038:
2034:
2032:
2029:
2021:
2016:
2009:
2003:
2001:
1996:
1989:
1983:
1982:
1975:
1969:
1961:
1956:
1955:
1949:
1945:
1940:
1939:
1936:
1935:
1930:
1918:
1912:
1909:
1906:
1903:
1902:
1901:
1900:
1899:
1898:
1895:
1892:
1885:
1883:
1882:
1879:
1877:
1865:
1861:
1860:
1859:
1853:
1852:
1851:Did you know?
1847:
1843:
1839:
1836:
1832:
1831:
1825:
1823:
1822:
1819:
1815:
1811:
1810:
1807:
1806:
1799:
1797:
1794:
1793:
1790:
1785:
1776:
1774:
1773:
1770:
1767:
1762:
1757:
1753:
1746:
1742:
1739:
1735:
1734:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1726:
1723:
1721:
1720:
1708:
1706:
1705:
1702:
1700:
1695:
1693:
1692:
1681:
1680:Thierry Henry
1678:
1676:
1675:
1672:
1664:
1662:
1661:
1658:
1654:
1646:
1640:
1637:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1626:
1623:
1617:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1594:
1591:
1586:
1580:
1576:
1572:
1571:
1570:
1569:
1566:
1561:
1558:
1555:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1541:
1537:
1533:
1530:
1526:
1522:
1519:
1513:
1511:
1510:
1507:
1504:
1498:
1492:
1488:
1485:
1481:
1480:
1475:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1469:
1465:
1458:
1456:
1453:
1446:
1442:
1439:
1435:
1434:
1433:
1432:
1429:
1425:
1418:
1415:
1413:
1412:
1409:
1407:
1401:
1396:
1392:
1377:
1374:
1371:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1349:
1346:
1344:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1324:
1321:
1317:
1313:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1304:
1301:
1297:
1294:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1282:
1279:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1262:
1260:
1254:
1250:
1245:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1236:
1232:
1228:
1220:
1216:
1213:
1209:
1208:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1196:
1189:
1186:
1178:
1175:
1171:
1170:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1161:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1142:
1133:
1130:
1129:
1121:
1119:
1115:
1114:
1109:
1107:
1106:
1101:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1091:
1086:
1084:
1083:
1078:
1076:
1072:
1071:
1066:
1065:
1061:
1060:
1050:
1045:
1044:
1041:
1040:
1033:
1032:
1026:
1022:
1017:
1016:
1013:
1010:
1006:
1005:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
994:
990:
983:
980:
978:
977:
973:
969:
961:
959:
958:
955:
951:
947:
942:
940:
937:
933:
926:
924:
923:
920:
912:
906:
903:
899:
898:
893:
892:
891:
888:
883:
882:
878:
874:
871:
866:
863:
860:
856:
855:
850:
846:
845:
844:
840:
836:
832:
828:
820:
817:
811:
796:
793:
789:
788:
783:
779:
776:
772:
768:
767:
766:
763:
759:
758:
757:
754:
749:
745:
741:
740:kya karega be
737:
736:
735:
732:
728:
727:
722:
718:
715:
711:
710:
709:
706:
702:
701:
695:
694:
693:
690:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
675:
674:192.43.227.18
666:
665:
661:
657:
653:
649:
641:
640:
639:
638:
635:
627:
624:
608:
604:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
586:
585:
584:
581:
563:
562:
561:
560:
558:
555:
550:
545:
541:
540:
539:
536:
532:
531:
525:
524:
523:
520:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
507:
503:
500:
497:
494:
487:
483:
479:
475:
474:
473:
472:
468:
464:
459:
458:
454:
450:
446:
439:
435:
432:
428:
425:
421:
420:
415:
411:
410:
409:
407:
404:
400:
393:
390:
386:
385:
380:
379:
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
351:
348:
346:
345:
342:
337:
333:
330:
326:
323:
320:
317:
313:
312:
307:
304:
303:
296:
295:
294:
287:
283:
280:
275:
274:
273:
272:
269:
264:
258:
257:
254:
251:
247:
246:
240:
239:
238:
237:
234:
230:
229:
225:
221:
218:
216:
210:
207:
203:
202:
197:
196:
195:
194:
191:
187:
184:
183:
174:
171:
168:
164:
160:
156:
155:
154:
153:
150:
147:
143:
142:
137:
136:
135:
134:
131:
128:
122:
121:
118:
115:
110:
105:
104:
101:
97:
93:
89:
86:
81:
80:
66:
63:
61:
60:
59:
56:
52:
51:
42:
38:
34:
30:
26:
19:
2012:
1999:
1987:my talk page
1977:
1967:
1944:User:Misza13
1925:
1922:
1889:
1875:
1871:
1858:Boy Charlton
1856:
1855:
1849:
1812:
1808:
1803:
1795:
1780:
1758:
1754:
1750:
1731:
1716:
1712:
1698:
1690:
1689:
1684:
1668:
1650:
1613:
1574:
1562:
1559:
1556:
1553:
1549:
1545:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1531:
1527:
1523:
1520:
1517:
1499:
1496:
1477:
1462:
1454:
1450:
1421:
1417:Boy Charlton
1399:
1394:
1390:
1388:
1224:
1205:
1192:
1138:
1126:
1123:
1111:
1110:
1103:
1102:
1088:
1087:
1082:Notice board
1080:
1079:
1068:
1067:
1057:
1056:
1035:
1002:
986:
965:
962:DaffyDuck619
943:
930:
916:
895:
852:
831:81.152.84.65
821:
818:
815:
785:
747:
743:
739:
724:
698:
672:
643:punishment ?
632:puppeteer ?
630:
578:
528:
490:
460:
442:
417:
396:
382:
365:Subhash bose
354:
338:
334:
331:
327:
324:
321:
318:
314:
308:
305:
300:
291:
288:User:Rushdie
262:
243:
231:
226:
222:
219:
213:
199:
188:
185:
179:
139:
123:
107:You blocked
106:
98:. Cheers. --
91:
72:
69:
48:
46:
45:
41:Anwar saadat
29:Subhash bose
1904:I replied.
1651:Looking at
1293:interesting
1095:Wikipedians
1034:Welcome to
968:Sarah Ewart
954:Scientizzle
825:—Preceding
746:. The word
742:- it means
646:—Preceding
626:User:Haphar
549:Manu Smriti
359:—Preceding
37:WikiSceptic
2022:algorithm.
1908:Hornplease
1894:Hornplease
1647:Please fix
1565:Rajatjghai
1476:Thankyou,
1113:Workgroups
1077:discussion
519:Hornplease
506:Hornplease
1800:Wind up ?
1777:A sad day
1738:rant-line
1653:this diff
1635:Ávril ʃáη
1621:Ávril ʃáη
1563:Regards.
1484:rant-line
1253:the guide
1212:rant-line
1009:rant-line
902:rant-line
859:rant-line
792:rant-line
731:rant-line
705:rant-line
535:rant-line
424:rant-line
389:rant-line
250:rant-line
206:rant-line
146:rant-line
55:rant-line
1733:Blnguyen
1699:Asterion
1503:David D.
1479:Blnguyen
1296:articles
1207:Blnguyen
1118:projects
1004:Blnguyen
927:Question
919:SatuSuro
897:Blnguyen
854:Blnguyen
839:contribs
827:unsigned
787:Blnguyen
771:WP:Civil
726:Blnguyen
700:Blnguyen
660:contribs
648:unsigned
580:Lkadvani
530:Blnguyen
419:Blnguyen
384:Blnguyen
373:contribs
361:unsigned
316:process
268:Lkadvani
245:Blnguyen
233:Lkadvani
201:Blnguyen
190:Lkadvani
141:Blnguyen
50:Blnguyen
1968:support
1842:21 July
1540:texts.
1019:expand
946:blocked
603:Bakaman
341:Rushdie
2019:ROT-26
2004:, the
1973:my RfA
1886:Creepy
1818:Haphar
1814:Haphar
1784:Nataly
1593:shth91
1506:(Talk)
1400:didn't
1373:(Talk)
1303:(Talk)
1249:WP:DYK
1151:Also,
1105:Portal
1099:Hindus
1021:Champa
982:Mỹ Sơn
887:Netaji
870:Netaji
847:Ok, a
762:Haphar
714:Haphar
689:Haphar
652:Haphar
634:Haphar
554:Netaji
478:Tintin
463:Tintin
449:Tintin
403:Netaji
279:Netaji
84:(Talk)
33:Haphar
2007:rouge
1994:Misza
1876:Grue
1657:Jumbo
1575:major
1370:ALoan
1300:ALoan
1298:! --
1174:D-Boy
1157:D-Boy
1141:D-Boy
993:D-Boy
167:mikka
127:mikka
114:mikka
100:Msiev
78:eagle
75:Noble
16:<
1948:pile
1928:Bane
1846:2006
1769:Halo
1718:Páll
1665:Tags
1610:Help
1468:Lost
1428:talk
972:Talk
941:...
835:talk
775:Lost
753:Lost
656:talk
601:Bose
482:talk
467:talk
453:talk
445:this
369:talk
39:and
1946:'s
1840:On
1826:DYK
1691:E
1671:Avi
1585:Shr
1581:.--
1466:--
1438:I@n
1424:I@n
1395:his
1393:on
1391:him
1312:Lar
1270:Lar
1251:or
1227:Lar
1195:I@n
1023:.
913:DYK
773:--
605:%%
443:Is
436:vs
170:(t)
130:(t)
117:(t)
2000:13
1872:--
1866:.
1848:,
1844:,
1761:Th
1736:|
1493:FA
1482:|
1426:≡
1405:LV
1342:LV
1314::
1272::
1258:LV
1229::
1210:|
1139:--
1131:.
1116:—
1093:—
1007:|
974:)
900:|
857:|
841:)
837:•
790:|
748:be
729:|
703:|
662:)
658:•
559:)
533:|
501:,
498:,
484:)
469:)
455:)
422:|
408:)
387:|
375:)
371:•
248:|
204:|
144:|
53:|
35:,
31:,
2030:.
1990:.
1950:!
1933:s
1788:a
1765:ε
1589:e
1320:c
1318:/
1316:t
1278:c
1276:/
1274:t
1235:c
1233:/
1231:t
970:(
864:.
833:(
797:.
654:(
480:(
465:(
451:(
367:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.