User talk:Thisisaniceusername

772:'Posting another person's personal information is harassment, unless that person voluntarily had posted his or her own information, or links to such information, on Knowledge. Personal information includes legal name, date of birth, identification numbers, home or workplace address, job title and work organisation, telephone number, email address, or other contact information, whether any such information is accurate or not. Posting such information about another editor is an unjustifiable and uninvited invasion of privacy and may place that editor at risk of harm outside of their activities on Knowledge. This applies to the personal information of both editors and non-editors. It also applies in the case of an editor who has requested a change in username, but whose old identifying marks can still be found. Any edit that "outs" someone must be reverted promptly, followed by a request for Oversight to delete that edit from Knowledge permanently.' 1825:. I maintain that if you had adopted a more constructive and less combative attitude and not taken the "I'm right and everyone else is wrong" approach whenever anyone disagreed with you, we really wouldn't have reached this current state. So I really would exhort you to listen to what people are saying here and try to be cooperative - as an example, it really shouldn't have taken three reversions, three warnings, and a block to get you to stop removing other people's comments from the AfD. So, how about we try to move forward more positively? I'll accept that everything you have tried to do has been in good faith (though, I think, a lot of it has been misguided), and you accept that community consensus is the way we operate here and you agree to listen to what other people say and avoid getting into edit/revert/repeat wars? Best regards -- 1766:", then we might have got somewhere constructively. But instead your reaction was to assume you were the victim of personal attacks and come out fighting, and that's usually the route downhill. Anyway, I'm only saying all this because I'm hoping there might still be a constructively way forward once your block is lifted. If you wish to play a part in building this excellent resource, you really will have to change your attitude to other editors, and engage in the civil collegiate culture that exists here - but if you can only live by rigidly following hard and fast rules and throwing rule books around whenever there is a disagreement, rather than taking each consensus as it comes, you really might not be suited to this endeavour. Only you can decide. Best regards -- 1395:, under the section "signs of disruptive editing," states: "resists moderation and/or requests for comment, continuing to edit in pursuit of a certain point despite an opposing consensus from impartial editors." By and large, rather than attempt to listen to arguments presented on the AFD, you continue to evade and battle around those issues, instead of addressing them. Also, removing comments that you don't like is against 988: 458: 731: 358: 280: 113: 1894: 1247: 1091: 532: 622:'s history, therefore I was just reverted destructive changes. And the article was changed back to earlier version. what I did just reverted unfounded charge. Also I have issue for block my previous account, I considered it was not a fair decision. I had this username youdontownwiki, You policy say people cannot use organization’s name, but wiki does not equal to Knowledge, see 969: 783: 1798:

their opinions on the issues in their ways. Also, you should really be the one to pay attention to civil issues. All pages have the detail of you accusing my good faith editing as spamming and Vandalism for so many times. Knowledge community is part of the world community, there are consensus on issues among all humans. There are outside values need to be respected.--

242: 70: 29: 204:

judge the article from its first version. you still have this mentality. I can give you many examples of much crappy articles in Knowledge than this one. You should not take this issue as a personal battle. You aim to win your pride at the price of the advancement of human knowledge. You have biased view to my article.

1979:

First block is for prevent people who would damage the wikipedia, there is no evidence I damaged, or going to damage wikipedia, I am just trying to write an article about animal protection at this moment. Second in DFA page, editors suggest the needs to improve the article, I can not do it while I am

203:

Boing! said Zebedee. Do you know what you are doing is stopping the spread of up-to-dated important knowledge? This is the most annoying part. The debate is far from conclusive, there are lots of dispute within people commented if you are honest about the current development. and its wrong for you to

187:

And I didn't say "only one academic said so" - what I'm saying is that all your article currently consists of is a few opening sentences and a list of stuff taken from Dr Meng. So if another article is referring to Dr Meng's conclusions, a link would be appropriate. But it really isn't a valid target

1995:

been proven to be disruptive in many ways. As such, a block for disruptive editing is required to prevent further disruption now, and in the future. As you have now done such a good job of alerting many admins to your actions, you can guarantee that your future edits will be closely monitored, and

170:

Look, the article is up for deletion discussion, yes? The !votes are currently heading towards delete/merge, yes? So there's a pretty good chance it will be deleted, yes? If it is, that means removing your links is just going to make more work for people if/when it comes to deletion - and there's no

154:

You need to provide offical wikipedia statement say I can not add links at this moment, otherwise its your personal opinion not wikipedia. And do you read reference at all? only one academic said so???? All from Dr Meng? Please do not disrupt the work of other editors. otherwise you are likely to be

1797:

but I disagree to some of your comments in the paragraph such as, 'failing to do that when people offered critique of the article, and tried to offer some guidelines to you' and we have not ' got somewhere constructively '. there are wilder, silent ordinances of the episode (Internet) who will give

617:

I have not causing damaging to wikipedia. I contributed. I was accused for unfounded issues by other editors. And before my reverts, I already tried to talk the issue in AFD page, but those editors don't read things carefully. Already one editor has confirmed and verified my article do not have the

1523:

hello, cite the online version of the dissertation is just for the Convenience of readers, people can definitely to go the university to get the original version which is not self published and is peer reviewed. academic conference article has cited this dissertation. see google scholar for detail

231:

Boing! said Zebedee. The links should have nothing to do with the article, but you used the case to accuse me for spaming on the debate page in the first place. This strength your debate on dfa by defaming me. This is not ethical. It was not spamming, its nothing more than disagreement in editing.

130:

Just STOP your link-spamming until the deletion discussion is concluded, and please take some notice of the explanations why your links are inappropriate. If your article survives, and you can make it applicable to the links you want to add, then you can still do that afterwards. But as it stands,

946:

I'm sure everyone here is well aware of Wiki policies, so you don't need to keep typing them out verbatim, it just looks like wiki-lawyering. Please try to take the advice of everyone (including Boing who has actually been trying to help you come to terms with policy) and stay out of trouble. –

1655:

In short, I see no substantive support for the main content of this article. The issue is not so much that the sources are not suitable for use on Knowledge, but with your inability to accept this, and your insistence that they are in fact suitable, despite many, many editors telling you the

823:

Identifying the fact that multiple comments in the same discussion are from the same editor is not prohibited by the above policy - if you continue to try to hide the fact that you contributed to the same discussion with three different IDs, you could be seen as guilty of sockpuppetry - see

1578:

its just let some people know the sources is reliable animal protection is consider different in different place, when you agreed the reliability of the source, because so many reliable sources republished it, those duplicated abstracts can be removed, I was prepared to do

131:

your article is only about some conclusions drawn by one particular study by a Dr Meng, and as such is not applicable as a "See also" link from those other articles. If you carry on like this, you're likely to be blocked from editing before the AfD is even finished.

1812:

You posted dozens of inappropriate links to the new article all over the place, and when asked to stop doing it by several people and having had the reasons explained to you, you simply ignored us and carried on - several times. It certainly looked like blatant

263:

located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you.

91:

50:

1868:

Sarek beat me to is in decline the above, so I will copy my rationale here: it also says "violating any other policy or guideline" which you did by removing fair comments by other users because they contradict or conflict with your intentions, i.e.

1406:

behavior of the community, not to alter it. If you are blocked for doing X, even though X is not explicitly against policy, and nobody is willing to unblock you, then X is effectively against policy, even though this is not documented

1187:

There is a difference between "harrasment" and "stuff you don't like or agree with." Your activity on the AFD has been incredibly disruptive. That's why you were blocked. I see no indication that this behavior is going to change.

375:

prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the

297:

171:

urgent need to the links to be added this week, is there? (Note that you adding links will not strengthen your case at AfD at all). So it's just plain common sense to hold off adding links until the AfD is complete, don't you think?

1570:) to the above book. (At least two "references" are links to the same content in alternate form, or are links to a book database search result page for the book. I shouldn't have to tell you why these don't count as references.) 188:

for a "See also" link - just have a look around and see what kind of mature and high-quality articles "See also" sections link to, and note that they are generally pretty short lists to avoid overwhelming an article with links.

1618: 1719:

Thanks for letting me know in fact wikipedia is regulated by people's opinions not by written policies, I didn't know that. So article may got discriminated just because the discrimination may be supported by more

1506:

In reply to your first point, copying content from other Knowledge articles does not make an article any more credible. Further, the only references I have seen related to the original content you added are:

1817:, and I think most people would not see the word "spamming" as being out of place. And if you might be able to technically avoid the "vandalism" label (which I will accept), your editing has certainly been 516:. This block prevents you, the person, from editing Knowledge for 48 hours under any account. Use our unblock appeal process (as described in the above notice) if you believe this block is not justified. 1762:, and I think this whole sorry episode is down to you failing to do that when people offered critique of the article, and tried to offer some guidelines to you. If you had stopped and thought " 1619:

http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&tbs=bks%3A1&q=humanesociety.org&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&oq=&gs_rfai=

859:'When investigating possible cases of COI editing, Wikipedians must be careful not to out other editors. Knowledge's policy against harassment takes precedence over the COI guideline.' 626:

I had to create current username itsaniceusername in order to keep my contribution, I didn’t care this too much at the time so didn’t report, but I think it worth to mention it here.

942:"referring to a user's good-faith edits as vandalism may lead to their feeling unfairly attacked. Use your best judgement, and be ready to apologize if you turn out to be wrong." 842:

I can do that no problem I am not tried to hid, I even told you in my talk page the link between the ip and first user name, but you are guilty to do it without my consent.--

1877:(it's not harrassment, it is a statement) and other disruptive edits. For a host of other reasons, please see the other unblock request declines, and serve out your time. 1336:, if one consider it is disruption, please provide specific line in the policy and my editing history show it is the case. Otherwise its unfair decision and false claim 795: 739: 2072:

with this organization, I can NOT see how you can claim COI on my part! Please refrain from using such abject untruths and obfuscations in your future edit summaries.

1934: 1850: 1287: 1131: 572: 1701:

In reply to your second point, I linked you to two policy pages that prohibit actions you have taken. My point is that policy documents community reaction. Policy

964:

review wikipedia'a policy is for only one reason, for the interests of wikipedia, no groups or individuals interests should take over the interest of wikipedia.

2040:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1381:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1220:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

717:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1980:

blocked. Third, if its not to do with organizations name, I would like to know the exact reason my first username was blocked. I look forward to responses

1929: 1282: 1126: 881: 567: 220: 1758:

consensus, they don't dictate it, as Chris has been trying to explain. Interaction between Knowledge editors is also guided by the assumption of

1764:

These might just be decent people with lots of experience developing this encyclopedia, so they might mean well and might have some valid points

1399:. Doing this once is not a huge deal, but you refused to listen to the feedback on your talk page informing you that this was not appropriate. 2025: 1366: 1205: 1024: 702: 55: 1389:

I am not going to review this request, since I have previously reviewed an unblock request, but I would like to point out two things:

1948: 1301: 1145: 586: 260: 88: 47: 1626: 2087: 341: 2009: 1525: 939:"ill-considered accusations of impropriety; ' and '(c) lying to mislead,including deliberately asserting false information;" 735: 686: 486: 381: 303: 52: 1858: 1830: 1822: 1771: 977: 832: 813: 758: 193: 176: 145: 136: 1818: 1392: 1000: 389: 311: 1454:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Animal_protection&action=historysubmit&diff=371171620&oldid=370241929

1068:

is not harassment", so I'm surprised at the reason given in the unblock request, below. Thisisaniceusername, drop the

1012: 502: 393: 315: 1332:

you can disagree a case is a harassment but what I did dose not fit into wikipedia's offical policy about disruption

1906:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

1259:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

1103:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

544:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

1907: 1260: 1104: 995: 800: 743: 545: 465: 399: 321: 125: 2060:

on my part? I can clearly see COI on your part, as your entire wikipedia career has been spent trying to insert

665:, you will know that it is not only organization names that are invalid as usernames. Finally, if you read the 1912: 1901: 1854: 1826: 1799: 1784: 1767: 1721: 1709: 1676: 1637: 1590: 1559: 1538: 1484: 1459: 1430: 1416: 1265: 1254: 1192: 1109: 1098: 1069: 973: 873: 843: 828: 809: 754: 550: 539: 212: 189: 172: 160: 141: 132: 752:

Please do not remove my comments from Talk pages - my comment is factual and is relevant to the final decision

778:'Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. ' 1352: 1004: 407: 377: 372: 363: 299: 294: 285: 893:

is not harassment. It does not constitute "Posting another person's personal information..." to link one

156: 1573:

A huge list of article abstracts. I don't know any situation in which citing this would be appropriate.

1235: 1055: 1034: 954: 918: 1748:

Thanks for letting me know in fact wikipedia is regulated by people's opinions not by written policies

1996:

a longer block will arrive should you repeat this. Your block has nothing to do with your username (

869: 521: 250: 208: 78: 37: 2080: 1751: 1706: 1427: 1413: 1189: 791: 747: 654: 385: 334: 307: 246: 117: 74: 33: 1997: 1348: 674: 1228:

The edits you removed were not harrassment and you are blocked for disruption, not vandalism. –

1610:

Several other peripheral websites that would not be appropriate to cite in an academic context.

897:

with another. Thisisaniceusername, stop messing around with the AfD and let it run its course.

865:

Also my editing was also about the harrasment of another editor, you should not revert them all

1814: 1627:

http://www.google.com/search?q=worldanimal.net&btnG=Search+Books&tbs=bks%3A1&tbo=1

670: 619: 482: 478: 368: 290: 269: 97: 1675:

In short everyone can have their opinions on facts, but their opinions may not be neutral. --

661:

process to achieve consensus for your edits. As far as your other username, if you read the

406:

Both you and the other editor need to stop reverting each other, and discuss your dispute at

2034: 1375: 1214: 1018: 711: 1526:

http://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?cluster=17938011654844695435&hl=en&as_sdt=200

1073: 987: 898: 517: 457: 438: 412: 1849:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at

1750:". Knowledge is, in fact, regulated by neither opinions nor policies, it is regulated by 353:

The 3 reverts rule does not apply . because my reverts are 'Reverting obvious vandalism'

155:

blocked (I just use your words here, I dont take it seriously, just like what you did)--

17: 2073: 1882: 1657: 426: 327: 730: 357: 279: 112: 2004: 1759: 1515: 1447:

this is a false claim, I listened, and improved article incorporated others opinions.

1396: 825: 681: 666: 658: 638: 513: 490: 430: 2094: 2015: 1886: 1862: 1834: 1807: 1792: 1775: 1729: 1712: 1684: 1645: 1598: 1567: 1546: 1492: 1467: 1433: 1419: 1356: 1239: 1195: 1081: 1059: 1038: 981: 958: 930:

please note following actions are also guilty in Knowledge policies (under uncivil)

922: 906: 851: 836: 817: 762: 692: 525: 446: 420: 348: 273: 224: 197: 180: 164: 149: 101: 58: 1176:

reverting harassment is requested by Knowledge policy (above), it is not Vandalism

642: 498: 494: 474: 265: 93: 1483:

thanks for confirm that this block was not based on any written Knowledge policy--

1511: 662: 437:

vandalism. Please do not refer to other editors' good faith edits as vandalism.

257:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 85:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 44:( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 1333: 968: 782: 259: 87: 46: 514:

WP:AN3#User:Thisisaniceusername reported by 64.53.165.54 (talk) (Result: 48h)

1878: 1458:

administrators also need provide evidence for statements, just to be fair--

388:

among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek

310:

among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek

2070:(other than removing your non notable insertions from Knowledge articles) 1853:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

121: 972:

Stop removing comments from the AfD and accusing people of harrassment!

241: 69: 28: 1011:

after the block expires. If you would like to be unblocked, you may

860: 931: 254: 82: 41: 673:. Current block is valid, and required to protect the article. ( 649:

time you can violate 3 reverts is in cases of actual vandalism -

2065: 775: 936:

not "Be especially welcoming and patient towards new users."

767: 669:

you will know that blaming others for your block is a case of

380:. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to 302:. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to 1615:

and following books cited the hsus website in their reference

1558:

Several disguised links (you should have assumed good faith--

1044:

TFWOR said "stop messing around with the AfD", I agreed. You

1892: 1334:

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Blocking_policy#Disruption

1245: 1089: 986: 530: 456: 1754:(click on the link to read all about it). Written policies 618:

claimed issues such as reliability and copyrights, pls see

2054:

this edit, reverting my removal of your off topic material

1623:

and following book cited the world animal net that I cited

249:

and Knowledge pages that have open discussion, you should

77:

and Knowledge pages that have open discussion, you should

36:

and Knowledge pages that have open discussion, you should

2022:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

1363:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

1202:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

790:

you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you

699:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

493:. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek 2042:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1383:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1222:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

719:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

245:

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

116:

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to

73:

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

32:

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to

2053: 1962: 1958: 1952: 1943: 1939: 1925: 1921: 1917: 1874: 1870: 1453: 1315: 1311: 1305: 1296: 1292: 1278: 1274: 1270: 1159: 1155: 1149: 1140: 1136: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1065: 1045: 890: 600: 596: 590: 581: 577: 563: 559: 555: 497:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 392:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 314:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 1900:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

1253:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

1097:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

538:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

623: 796:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Animal protection 768:http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikihounding#Wikihounding 740:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Animal protection 384:to work towards wording and content that gains a 306:to work towards wording and content that gains a 1851:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents 1412:I hope this sheds some light on your block. -- 1510:A self-published thesis in book form. Fails 1426:Reorganized reply to make dialogue easier. -- 856:'unless that person voluntarily had posted ' 807:DO NOT REMOVE MY COMMENTS FROM THE DISCUSSION 738:legitimate talk page comments, as you did at 501:. If you would like to be unblocked, you may 8: 485:. During a dispute, you should first try to 657:, and it is a best practice to follow the 367:according to the reverts you have made on 289:according to the reverts you have made on 361:You currently appear to be engaged in an 283:You currently appear to be engaged in an 861:http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia%3ACOIN 2068:, but as I have never had any dealings 932:http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia%3ACIV 1991:I think the above states it well: you 776:http://en.wikipedia.org/Page_blanking 7: 2058:(claimed by you in the edit summary) 1072:and address your behaviour instead. 1402:Most policy exists to document the 512:The full report of this case is at 1450:see the difference of the versions 1048:, so this is your second block. – 1003:. Please stop. You are welcome to 25: 2048:Conflict of interest? I think not 1705:prescribe community reaction. -- 396:. If the edit warring continues, 318:. If the edit warring continues, 1347:Chris says it quite well below. 967: 781: 734:Please stop. If you continue to 729: 645:by now, you would know that the 477:caused by your engagement in an 356: 278: 258: 240: 111: 86: 68: 45: 27: 1023:below, but you should read our 794:Knowledge again, as you did at 653:a content dispute. We work on 1: 2066:http://www.mindinganimals.com 505:by adding the text {{unblock| 487:discuss controversial changes 469:from editing for a period of 382:discuss controversial changes 304:discuss controversial changes 1783:Thanks for the information-- 624:http://en.wikipedia.org/Wiki 2095:01:34, 17 August 2010 (UTC) 1904:, who declined the request. 1744:Note to Thisisaniceusername 1257:, who declined the request. 1101:, who declined the request. 1001:abuse of editing privileges 542:, who declined the request. 139:) 22:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC) 2110: 999:from editing for repeated 993:You have been temporarily 2026:guide to appealing blocks 1367:guide to appealing blocks 1206:guide to appealing blocks 1025:guide to appealing blocks 703:guide to appealing blocks 693:11:17, 28 June 2010 (UTC) 667:guide to appealing blocks 526:19:48, 27 June 2010 (UTC) 447:16:13, 27 June 2010 (UTC) 421:16:11, 27 June 2010 (UTC) 404:without further notice. 349:15:31, 27 June 2010 (UTC) 326:without further notice. 274:12:45, 27 June 2010 (UTC) 225:10:41, 27 June 2010 (UTC) 198:10:22, 27 June 2010 (UTC) 181:10:18, 27 June 2010 (UTC) 165:23:23, 26 June 2010 (UTC) 150:22:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC) 120:Knowledge, as you did at 102:19:50, 26 June 2010 (UTC) 59:19:28, 26 June 2010 (UTC) 2062:(or prevent deletion of) 2016:09:38, 3 July 2010 (UTC) 1887:15:41, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 1863:13:09, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 1835:10:04, 2 July 2010 (UTC) 1808:09:41, 2 July 2010 (UTC) 1803: 1793:08:46, 2 July 2010 (UTC) 1788: 1776:08:36, 2 July 2010 (UTC) 1730:07:55, 2 July 2010 (UTC) 1725: 1713:20:12, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 1685:07:55, 2 July 2010 (UTC) 1680: 1646:07:55, 2 July 2010 (UTC) 1641: 1599:07:55, 2 July 2010 (UTC) 1594: 1568:08:17, 2 July 2010 (UTC) 1563: 1547:07:55, 2 July 2010 (UTC) 1542: 1493:15:55, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 1488: 1468:16:00, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 1463: 1434:20:12, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 1420:15:19, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 1357:15:37, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 1240:13:48, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 1196:13:52, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 1082:13:49, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 1060:13:05, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 1039:13:03, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 982:12:59, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 959:12:27, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 923:12:15, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 907:11:56, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 852:11:47, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 847: 837:11:43, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 818:11:40, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 763:11:30, 1 July 2010 (UTC) 637:As you should have read 425:...also, have a read of 18:User talk:Youdontownwiki 1897: 1250: 1094: 991: 803:without further notice 535: 461: 1949:change block settings 1896: 1302:change block settings 1249: 1146:change block settings 1093: 990: 659:bold, revert, discuss 587:change block settings 534: 460: 452:Edit warring sanction 2056:? where was the COI 801:blocked from editing 126:blocked from editing 1913:Thisisaniceusername 1855:Boing! said Zebedee 1827:Boing! said Zebedee 1800:Thisisaniceusername 1785:Thisisaniceusername 1768:Boing! said Zebedee 1722:Thisisaniceusername 1677:Thisisaniceusername 1638:Thisisaniceusername 1591:Thisisaniceusername 1560:Thisisaniceusername 1539:Thisisaniceusername 1485:Thisisaniceusername 1460:Thisisaniceusername 1266:Thisisaniceusername 1110:Thisisaniceusername 1021:|Your reason here}} 1015:by adding the text 974:Boing! said Zebedee 874:Thisisaniceusername 844:Thisisaniceusername 829:Boing! said Zebedee 810:Boing! said Zebedee 755:Boing! said Zebedee 551:Thisisaniceusername 473:to prevent further 213:Thisisaniceusername 190:Boing! said Zebedee 173:Boing! said Zebedee 142:Boing! said Zebedee 133:Boing! said Zebedee 1898: 1251: 1095: 992: 536: 495:dispute resolution 462: 390:dispute resolution 312:dispute resolution 1480: 1479:Reply to point #2 1444: 1443:Reply to point #1 1436: 1070:WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT 1013:appeal this block 886: 872:comment added by 620:animal protection 503:appeal this block 483:Animal protection 378:three-revert rule 373:three-revert rule 369:Animal protection 300:three-revert rule 295:three-revert rule 291:Animal protection 236:Your recent edits 228: 211:comment added by 64:Your recent edits 16:(Redirected from 2101: 2092: 2085: 2078: 2039: 2033: 2012: 2008: 2000: 1968: 1966: 1955: 1937: 1935:deleted contribs 1895: 1478: 1442: 1425: 1380: 1374: 1321: 1319: 1308: 1290: 1288:deleted contribs 1248: 1233: 1219: 1213: 1165: 1163: 1152: 1134: 1132:deleted contribs 1092: 1053: 1032: 1022: 971: 952: 916: 885: 866: 785: 733: 716: 710: 689: 685: 677: 606: 604: 593: 575: 573:deleted contribs 533: 507:your reason here 371:. Note that the 360: 346: 339: 332: 293:. Note that the 282: 262: 244: 227: 205: 115: 90: 72: 49: 31: 21: 2109: 2108: 2104: 2103: 2102: 2100: 2099: 2098: 2088: 2081: 2074: 2050: 2045: 2037: 2031: 2030:, then use the 2019: 2010: 2002: 1998: 1982: 1956: 1946: 1932: 1915: 1908:blocking policy 1893: 1885: 1847: 1656:opposite. See 1386: 1378: 1372: 1371:, then use the 1360: 1338: 1309: 1299: 1285: 1268: 1261:blocking policy 1246: 1229: 1225: 1217: 1211: 1210:, then use the 1199: 1178: 1153: 1143: 1129: 1112: 1105:blocking policy 1090: 1049: 1041: 1028: 1016: 948: 912: 867: 727: 722: 714: 708: 707:, then use the 696: 687: 679: 675: 663:username policy 628: 594: 584: 570: 553: 546:blocking policy 531: 510: 499:page protection 454: 394:page protection 342: 335: 328: 316:page protection 253:by typing four 251:sign your posts 238: 206: 109: 81:by typing four 79:sign your posts 66: 40:by typing four 38:sign your posts 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2107: 2105: 2049: 2046: 2020: 1989: 1985:Decline reason 1977: 1973:Request reason 1970: 1891: 1890: 1889: 1881: 1846: 1843: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1839: 1838: 1837: 1795: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1737: 1736: 1735: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1688: 1687: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1630: 1629: 1624: 1621: 1616: 1613: 1612: 1611: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1575: 1574: 1571: 1535: 1534: 1533: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1520: 1519: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1481: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1456: 1451: 1448: 1445: 1423: 1422: 1410: 1409: 1408: 1400: 1361: 1345: 1341:Decline reason 1330: 1326:Request reason 1323: 1244: 1243: 1242: 1200: 1185: 1181:Decline reason 1174: 1170:Request reason 1167: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 985: 962: 961: 928: 927: 926: 925: 840: 839: 736:delete or edit 726: 723: 697: 635: 631:Decline reason 615: 611:Request reason 608: 529: 463:You have been 455: 453: 450: 237: 234: 201: 200: 184: 183: 157:Youdontownwiki 108: 105: 65: 62: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2106: 2097: 2096: 2093: 2091: 2086: 2084: 2079: 2077: 2071: 2067: 2064:material for 2063: 2059: 2055: 2047: 2044: 2043: 2036: 2029: 2027: 2018: 2017: 2013: 2007: 2006: 2001: 1994: 1988: 1986: 1981: 1976: 1974: 1969: 1964: 1960: 1954: 1950: 1945: 1941: 1936: 1931: 1927: 1926:global blocks 1923: 1922:active blocks 1919: 1914: 1909: 1905: 1903: 1902:administrator 1888: 1884: 1880: 1876: 1872: 1867: 1866: 1865: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1844: 1836: 1832: 1828: 1824: 1820: 1816: 1811: 1810: 1809: 1805: 1801: 1796: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1757: 1753: 1749: 1745: 1731: 1727: 1723: 1718: 1717: 1716: 1715: 1714: 1711: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1699: 1698: 1697: 1696: 1695: 1686: 1682: 1678: 1674: 1673: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1659: 1654: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1643: 1639: 1628: 1625: 1622: 1620: 1617: 1614: 1609: 1608: 1607: 1606: 1605: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1601: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1577: 1576: 1572: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1557: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1544: 1540: 1527: 1522: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1508: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1482: 1477: 1476: 1475: 1474: 1469: 1465: 1461: 1457: 1455: 1452: 1449: 1446: 1441: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1435: 1432: 1429: 1421: 1418: 1415: 1411: 1405: 1401: 1398: 1394: 1391: 1390: 1388: 1387: 1385: 1384: 1377: 1370: 1368: 1359: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1349:SarekOfVulcan 1344: 1342: 1337: 1335: 1329: 1327: 1322: 1317: 1313: 1307: 1303: 1298: 1294: 1289: 1284: 1280: 1279:global blocks 1276: 1275:active blocks 1272: 1267: 1262: 1258: 1256: 1255:administrator 1241: 1237: 1232: 1227: 1226: 1224: 1223: 1216: 1209: 1207: 1198: 1197: 1194: 1191: 1184: 1182: 1177: 1173: 1171: 1166: 1161: 1157: 1151: 1147: 1142: 1138: 1133: 1128: 1124: 1123:global blocks 1120: 1119:active blocks 1116: 1111: 1106: 1102: 1100: 1099:administrator 1083: 1080: 1079: 1076: 1071: 1067: 1064:I also said " 1063: 1062: 1061: 1057: 1052: 1047: 1046:didn't listen 1043: 1042: 1040: 1036: 1031: 1026: 1020: 1014: 1010: 1009:contributions 1008: 1002: 998: 997: 989: 984: 983: 979: 975: 970: 965: 960: 956: 951: 945: 944: 943: 940: 937: 934: 933: 924: 920: 915: 910: 909: 908: 905: 904: 901: 896: 892: 889: 888: 887: 883: 879: 875: 871: 863: 862: 857: 854: 853: 849: 845: 838: 834: 830: 827: 822: 821: 820: 819: 815: 811: 808: 804: 802: 798:, you may be 797: 793: 789: 788:final warning 784: 779: 777: 773: 770: 769: 765: 764: 760: 756: 753: 749: 745: 742:, you may be 741: 737: 732: 724: 721: 720: 713: 706: 704: 695: 694: 690: 684: 683: 678: 672: 668: 664: 660: 656: 652: 648: 644: 640: 634: 632: 627: 625: 621: 614: 612: 607: 602: 598: 592: 588: 583: 579: 574: 569: 565: 564:global blocks 561: 560:active blocks 557: 552: 547: 543: 541: 540:administrator 528: 527: 523: 519: 515: 508: 504: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 480: 476: 472: 468: 467: 459: 451: 449: 448: 445: 444: 441: 436: 432: 428: 423: 422: 419: 418: 415: 411: 409: 408:the talk page 403: 401: 395: 391: 387: 383: 379: 374: 370: 366: 365: 359: 354: 351: 350: 347: 345: 340: 338: 333: 331: 325: 323: 317: 313: 309: 305: 301: 296: 292: 288: 287: 281: 276: 275: 271: 267: 261: 256: 252: 248: 243: 235: 233: 229: 226: 222: 218: 214: 210: 199: 195: 191: 186: 185: 182: 178: 174: 169: 168: 167: 166: 162: 158: 152: 151: 147: 143: 140: 138: 134: 127: 124:, you may be 123: 119: 114: 106: 104: 103: 99: 95: 89: 84: 80: 76: 71: 63: 61: 60: 57: 54: 48: 43: 39: 35: 30: 19: 2089: 2082: 2075: 2069: 2061: 2057: 2051: 2041: 2023: 2021: 2003: 1992: 1990: 1984: 1983: 1978: 1972: 1971: 1944:creation log 1911: 1899: 1848: 1763: 1755: 1747: 1743: 1742: 1702: 1635: 1588: 1536: 1424: 1403: 1382: 1364: 1362: 1346: 1340: 1339: 1331: 1325: 1324: 1297:creation log 1264: 1252: 1230: 1221: 1203: 1201: 1186: 1180: 1179: 1175: 1169: 1168: 1141:creation log 1108: 1096: 1077: 1074: 1050: 1029: 1006: 994: 966: 963: 949: 941: 938: 935: 929: 913: 902: 899: 894: 877: 868:— Preceding 864: 858: 855: 841: 806: 799: 787: 786:This is the 780: 774: 771: 766: 751: 728: 718: 700: 698: 680: 655:WP:CONSENSUS 650: 646: 636: 630: 629: 616: 610: 609: 582:creation log 549: 537: 511: 506: 470: 464: 442: 439: 434: 424: 416: 413: 405: 402:from editing 397: 362: 355: 352: 343: 336: 329: 324:from editing 319: 284: 277: 239: 230: 216: 202: 153: 129: 110: 67: 26: 1823:tendentious 1815:POV-pushing 1746:: You say " 1393:This policy 398:you may be 320:you may be 207:—Preceding 2052:Regarding 1940:filter log 1819:disruptive 1760:good faith 1293:filter log 1137:filter log 671:WP:NOTTHEM 578:filter log 518:EdJohnston 509:}} below. 475:disruption 433:edits are 431:Good faith 247:talk pages 75:talk pages 34:talk pages 2024:read the 1959:checkuser 1918:block log 1752:consensus 1720:people.-- 1407:anywhere. 1365:read the 1312:checkuser 1271:block log 1204:read the 1156:checkuser 1115:block log 1027:first. – 911:Agree. – 792:vandalize 748:vandalism 725:July 2010 701:read the 597:checkuser 556:block log 491:consensus 489:and seek 386:consensus 308:consensus 118:vandalize 107:June 2010 53:Fut.Perf. 2005:BWilkins 1930:contribs 1703:does not 1404:existing 1283:contribs 1127:contribs 882:contribs 870:unsigned 682:BWilkins 568:contribs 479:edit war 471:48 hours 364:edit war 286:edit war 221:contribs 209:unsigned 122:Wildlife 2035:unblock 1953:unblock 1756:reflect 1658:WP:IDHT 1376:unblock 1306:unblock 1231:B.hotep 1215:unblock 1150:unblock 1051:B.hotep 1030:B.hotep 1019:unblock 996:blocked 950:B.hotep 914:B.hotep 895:account 744:blocked 712:unblock 641:and/or 591:unblock 466:blocked 427:WP:VAND 400:blocked 322:blocked 266:SineBot 94:SineBot 2011:←track 1710:(talk) 1516:WP:SPS 1431:(talk) 1417:(talk) 1397:WP:TPO 1193:(talk) 1007:useful 826:WP:SPI 688:←track 639:WP:3RR 255:tildes 83:tildes 42:tildes 2028:first 1999:talk→ 1883:ping! 1707:Chris 1428:Chris 1414:Chris 1369:first 1208:first 1190:Chris 1005:make 705:first 676:talk→ 643:WP:EW 435:never 1993:have 1879:S.G. 1875:this 1871:this 1859:talk 1831:talk 1821:and 1804:talk 1789:talk 1772:talk 1726:talk 1681:talk 1642:talk 1595:talk 1579:that 1564:talk 1543:talk 1514:per 1512:WP:V 1489:talk 1464:talk 1353:talk 1236:talk 1075:TFOW 1066:This 1056:talk 1035:talk 978:talk 955:talk 919:talk 900:TFOW 891:This 878:talk 848:talk 833:talk 814:talk 759:talk 746:for 647:only 522:talk 440:TFOW 414:TFOW 270:talk 217:talk 194:talk 177:talk 161:talk 146:talk 137:talk 98:talk 2090:Dat 2083:Wuz 2076:Wuh 1963:log 1910:). 1845:ANI 1316:log 1263:). 1160:log 1107:). 805:. 750:. 651:not 601:log 548:). 481:at 344:Dat 337:Wuz 330:Wuh 128:. 2038:}} 2032:{{ 2014:) 1987:: 1975:: 1957:• 1951:• 1947:• 1942:• 1938:• 1933:• 1928:• 1924:• 1920:• 1873:, 1861:) 1833:) 1806:) 1791:) 1774:) 1728:) 1683:) 1644:) 1636:-- 1597:) 1589:-- 1566:) 1545:) 1537:-- 1491:) 1466:) 1379:}} 1373:{{ 1355:) 1343:: 1328:: 1310:• 1304:• 1300:• 1295:• 1291:• 1286:• 1281:• 1277:• 1273:• 1238:• 1218:}} 1212:{{ 1188:-- 1183:: 1172:: 1154:• 1148:• 1144:• 1139:• 1135:• 1130:• 1125:• 1121:• 1117:• 1058:• 1037:• 1017:{{ 980:) 957:• 921:• 884:) 880:• 850:) 835:) 816:) 761:) 715:}} 709:{{ 691:) 633:: 613:: 595:• 589:• 585:• 580:• 576:• 571:• 566:• 562:• 558:• 524:) 429:. 272:) 264:-- 223:) 219:• 196:) 179:) 163:) 148:) 100:) 92:-- 1967:) 1965:) 1961:( 1916:( 1857:( 1829:( 1802:( 1787:( 1770:( 1724:( 1679:( 1660:. 1640:( 1593:( 1562:( 1541:( 1518:. 1495:. 1487:( 1462:( 1351:( 1320:) 1318:) 1314:( 1269:( 1234:• 1164:) 1162:) 1158:( 1113:( 1078:R 1054:• 1033:• 976:( 953:• 917:• 903:R 876:( 846:( 831:( 812:( 757:( 605:) 603:) 599:( 554:( 520:( 443:R 417:R 410:. 268:( 215:( 192:( 175:( 159:( 144:( 135:( 96:( 56:☼ 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index