Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Zalinda Zenobia

Source 📝

399: 357: 315: 273: 54: 112:
deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can
243:
Omnipaedista is quite right. Far from there being any evidence of using logged out editing to appear to be a different person, the "evidence" you gave was Omnipaedista indicating perfectly openly that he/she was the same person, which is not by any stretch of imagination evidence of sockpuppetry.
183:
In no way have I ever used 195.134.64.173 in an inappropriate way. Nor have I ever used more than one account or an IP address to contribute to the same page or discussion in a way that suggests "that they are multiple people." On the contrary: on the specific talk-page-comment you have used as
179:
activities such as copy editing, wikifying, or linking" in order to avoid such accusations. (Incidentally, I want to clarify that I may sometimes log in when using this network, but this depends on the specific computer lab; computers of this network pose varying degrees of security concerns.)
102:) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the 114: 86:, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 23:
Of course the article is inevitably going to be deleted. But why not just let the guy place the {hangon} tag and try to make a defense, instead of continuing to revert the tag? Saves you effort, and maybe he'll actually look up
213:
Note also that you have not followed good practice: i) you may have placed a tag on my user-page but you have not notified me in my talk-page; ii) you have created "suspected sockpuppet category pages"
97:
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion
410: 368: 326: 284: 207: 175:
that I used belonged to a public network. I have occasionally used computers belonging to this network but whenever I used this IP, I used it only for "
219: 43: 225: 406: 391: 364: 349: 322: 307: 280: 265: 195: 172: 318: 303: 276: 261: 194:). I did not use this IP for "creating an illusion of support" in a vote or argument. (Incidentally, I would like to clarify that 63: 402: 387: 360: 345: 70: 151: 118: 164:
to say the least. According to policy, what constitutes sockpuppetry, among others, is "logging out to make
91: 249: 233: 203: 199: 146:. I would like to inform you that editing as an IP address separate from one's account is not forbidden 33: 126: 104: 17: 202:
could easily verify.) So, there was nothing illegitimate in my activities. Please always assume
154:
only says that one "should carefully avoid any crossover on articles or topics." Still, calling
245: 229: 418: 376: 334: 292: 29: 87: 83: 25: 150:(this practice may be used "to maintain security on public computers"). The corresponging 122: 79: 47: 82:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under
414: 372: 330: 288: 422: 380: 338: 296: 253: 237: 130: 37: 62:
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
92:
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
52: 108:
to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for
190: 156: 142: 188:
that I am the same person as 195.134.64.173 (I say:
90:, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please 409:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at 367:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at 325:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at 283:. You are invited to comment on the discussion at 319:Template:Party shading/Constitutional Nationalist 304:Template:Party shading/Constitutional Nationalist 208:"not used for abuse does not warrant a complaint" 277:Template:Party shading/Constitutional (Kenseito) 262:Template:Party shading/Constitutional (Kenseito) 60: 411:the entry on the Templates for discussion page 369:the entry on the Templates for discussion page 327:the entry on the Templates for discussion page 285:the entry on the Templates for discussion page 84:section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion 8: 168:edits as an IP". This is not the case here. 140:Hello. I have noticed that you have made 28:and learn something. Or not. Whatever. - 64:the guide to writing your first article 403:Template:Party shading/Military (Navy) 388:Template:Party shading/Military (Navy) 361:Template:Party shading/Military (Army) 346:Template:Party shading/Military (Army) 191:"That is not my point. My point is..." 7: 121:the page or email a copy to you. 69:You may want to consider using the 407:listed at templates for discussion 365:listed at templates for discussion 323:listed at templates for discussion 281:listed at templates for discussion 117:to request that the administrator 14: 397: 355: 313: 271: 1: 423:09:23, 24 December 2021 (UTC) 381:09:23, 24 December 2021 (UTC) 339:09:22, 24 December 2021 (UTC) 297:09:22, 24 December 2021 (UTC) 105:the page's talk page directly 38:14:07, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 184:evidence for sockpuppetry I 88:criteria for speedy deletion 73:to help you create articles. 254:16:06, 28 August 2011 (UTC) 238:12:40, 28 August 2011 (UTC) 115:one of these administrators 438: 198:'s edits are not mine as 143:this edit to my user-page 78:A tag has been placed on 392:templates for discussion 350:templates for discussion 308:templates for discussion 266:templates for discussion 206:; an IP address that is 131:00:02, 1 June 2011 (UTC) 75: 57: 56: 210:for sock-puppetry. 186:explicitly declare 58: 429: 401: 400: 359: 358: 317: 316: 275: 274: 193: 160:sockpuppetry is 159: 145: 101: 55: 437: 436: 432: 431: 430: 428: 427: 426: 398: 395: 356: 353: 314: 311: 272: 269: 189: 171:The IP address 155: 141: 138: 99: 76: 53: 51: 44:Speedy deletion 21: 12: 11: 5: 435: 433: 394: 384: 352: 342: 310: 300: 268: 258: 257: 256: 196:146.151.66.190 173:195.134.64.173 137: 134: 80:Aldo Rodriguez 71:Article Wizard 59: 50: 48:Aldo Rodriguez 46:nomination of 41: 20: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 434: 425: 424: 420: 416: 412: 408: 404: 393: 389: 385: 383: 382: 378: 374: 370: 366: 362: 351: 347: 343: 341: 340: 336: 332: 328: 324: 320: 309: 305: 301: 299: 298: 294: 290: 286: 282: 278: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 242: 241: 240: 239: 235: 231: 227: 224: 221: 217: 211: 209: 205: 201: 197: 192: 187: 181: 178: 174: 169: 167: 163: 158: 153: 149: 144: 135: 133: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 111: 107: 106: 95: 93: 89: 85: 81: 74: 72: 67: 65: 49: 45: 42: 40: 39: 35: 31: 27: 19: 18:Geoff Clapham 16: 396: 354: 312: 270: 246:JamesBWatson 230:Omnipaedista 222: 215: 212: 200:WP:CheckUser 185: 182: 176: 170: 165: 161: 147: 139: 109: 103: 96: 77: 68: 61: 22: 386:Listing of 344:Listing of 302:Listing of 260:Listing of 166:problematic 30:FisherQueen 226:my account 204:good faith 123:Epeefleche 100:{{db-...}} 405:has been 363:has been 321:has been 279:has been 177:innocuous 218:for the 113:contact 162:extreme 415:Gonnym 373:Gonnym 331:Gonnym 289:Gonnym 152:policy 148:per se 119:userfy 110:speedy 26:WP:BIO 419:talk 377:talk 335:talk 293:talk 250:talk 234:talk 216:both 157:this 136:Note 127:talk 34:Talk 390:at 348:at 306:at 264:at 228:. — 223:and 94:. 421:) 413:. 379:) 371:. 337:) 329:. 295:) 287:. 252:) 236:) 220:IP 129:) 36:) 417:( 375:( 333:( 291:( 248:( 232:( 125:( 98:( 66:. 32:(

Index

Geoff Clapham
WP:BIO
FisherQueen
Talk
14:07, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion
Aldo Rodriguez
the guide to writing your first article
Article Wizard
Aldo Rodriguez
section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion
criteria for speedy deletion
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable
the page's talk page directly
one of these administrators
userfy
Epeefleche
talk
00:02, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
this edit to my user-page
policy
this
195.134.64.173
"That is not my point. My point is..."
146.151.66.190
WP:CheckUser
good faith
"not used for abuse does not warrant a complaint"
IP
my account

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.