User talk:Zello - Knowledge

61:

someone who doesn't come from the Carpathian Basin, I am a little turned-off by a language article that has a tag for a neutrality dispute. If I were interested in the language and its structure, I wouldn't want to be dragged into watching a bunch of nationalists arguing over whose word is whose and constantly reverting the article unless there were grave errors in explaining grammar, morphology, syntax or lexicon. The Serbo-Croatian article suffers from a similar problem but to an even greater degree as we have Serbs, Croats and Bosnians using the language's article and its talk-page to criticize each other and act out non-linguistic rivalries. The thing is that mountains change "ownership" because of political or military decisions as it's a matter of one group of people invading or laying claim to that territory. Lexicons can change less deliberately and all speakers from erudite scholars to humble farmers can incorporate new words and structures as they see fit. Thus we could argue that pasting a list showing the sheer number of Slavonic loanwords in Hungarian could be interpreted that Hungarians were somehow culturally inferior in being copycats since they had to borrow a lot of Slavonic words. The presence of geographical features such as which country has higher mountains or cleaner forests can't lead to the same conclusion about cultural sophistication.

895:

saying that his profile does not comply with neither WP:POLITICIAN nor WP:GNG. They also propose deletion as they see this page as a means to aggrandise Janos Boros. We searched the wiki for other vice mayors from Romania, to see if ex-vice mayors of Roamnian city councils and ex-vice presidents of political parties deserve and have their pages. Many of them, both ex and present have wiki pages dedicated to them. If these Romanian vice mayors can have their pages on wiki, while they some of them have not even served terms in office half of what Mr. Boros did, why not a page for Janos Boros? We are in the process of re-writing the page, as we agree with the critics that the page was poorly written. But outright request for deletion will be a biased one and unfair to our effort. If you find time, your help would be most welcome and appreciated.

976:

eager to "win" again the old wars. I hope you will have the time and energy to convince other Romanian editors and other admins to help you because that's the only way to preserve the achievements. I don't know whether those Romanians who worked for the compromise are active now or left wikipedia. I can't really help you because I only do small maintenance work and sometimes add a bit of uncontroversial information to articles (generally not related to Hungarian or Romanian topics). Although I didn't left the project I can't spend too much time here because of my increased workload. But in case of voting drop me a line here.

301:- Dating and art school of the Frumuşeni mosaics are controversial. Although some sources claim that they are Byzantine and belong to the 9-10th century the majority opinion is that they were made only in the 12th century for the Catholic Bizere Monastery. Even the existence of the earlier Orthodox monastery remained unproven while Bizere certainly existed. In this case (ie. they are western works from the 12th century) zellige simply predates the Frumuşeni mosaics so they can't be the source of inspiration. 31:

of Slovak's supposedly major contribution to Hungarian culture. As it is, I can see a mini edit-war going on, since we have an all-or-nothing approach where people like Tankred insist on a long-winded list while you insist on having no list at all. As a non-Slovak and non-Hungarian, can't we all just compromise and put short lists showing both directions? As it was before, my shortened list provided a nice balance to your short list, so it wouldn't look like one side was trying to overwhelm the other.

699:

serious debates about their usage in historical context and infoboxes with Juro, Tankred, Panonian but even they accepted their presence in the lead (or in Vojvodina's case in the Names section) without problem, not to mention Romanian users who are generally friendly and helpful. In Central-European topics deleting alternative names was generally seen as trolling not "content dispute" (except of course when the names are not verifiable as sometimes happens but in really rare cases).

1923:. There's a new bonus prize of $ 200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale! 670:. Also, when disagreeing about something at an article, it is not good to just edit war. Better is to explain your concerns at the article talkpage. Lastly, when someone removes information from an article, it is not a good idea to add it back, unless you have a source which allows for the information to be verified. In the case of Hungarian names, just providing a source that shows that a name is used in Hungarian, is not enough. Per 231:

television, newspapers, and books. It is very misleading to state that today this word is considered offensive. When badmouthing someone, some people tend to ascribe all his/her faults to him/her being different (e.g. "stupid German" or "stupid 'néger'"), and today Hungarians have greater opportunities for meeting black people (and consequently for badmouthing them). But this does not mean that the meaning of the word has changed.

1087: 1729:. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like 3072: 2744: 1065: 1036: 463: 3116: 2922: 2800: 2654: 2304: 2153: 1934: 1762: 298:- Low importance: Frumuşeni doesnt't belong to the great mosaic works of art, it has some local and scientific importance because of its northern location and singularity but it's not on a par with the great mosaics of Constantinople, Venice, Sicily or Damascus. I can't imagine how this poor little northern monastery could be the source of this highly important Islamic art tradition. 820: 295:- Huge physical distance: the zellige article claims that zellige appeared in Morocco in the 10th century. Frumuşeni is in present-day Romania, near the Hungarian border. Direct influence seems highly improbable between these two distant regions. Far more plausible to search the source of inspiration in the Middle East or Spain which had strong ties in trade with Morocco. 3206: 2565: 1737:, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- 385: 46:

of some Slovak users who trying to prove their ethnic superiority even when they are writing about their own mother language. Is it necessary to give a list in the Geography of Slovakia article about the lowness of Hungarian mountains? Is it a good compromise to mention 2-3 Hungarian hills only for comparison? Isn't this absurd?

30:

included some Slavonic loanwords in my edit. I know what you're trying to say by not going into great detail about Slavonic loanwords in Hungarian and removing my examples from the article, but I felt that my way would at least give even less justification to people like Tankred to belabour the point

75:

It is possible that Hungarians in the 10th century were culturally inferior in many ways than Slavs. What does it matter? Linguistics is not a question of national pride. Anybody can add as a long list of Slavic loanwords to the Hungarian language article as possible. But the same list in the Slovak

3300:

The dialect examples came from Imre Samu: Felsőőri tájszótár, practically the only book describing the peasant language of the area. Unfortunately, at time I did not give proper citations when I added content to Knowledge (it was almost twenty years ago) and I can't find the book now to look up the

894:

We recently put up a page on Janos Boros, the Hungarian politician from Kolozsvar and ex-vice mayor. But this has been notified by some users on Wiki for deletion. If they had asked us to improve the text, we would have happily obliged. But they are attacking the very credentials of the personality

155:

Good evening. I saw some of your photographs and I was wondering if you would be interested in selling me or letting me use the rights to your photo of the Chiesa di SS. Luca and Martina. I'm a researcher, and I'm doing a web project on Rome. If you could leave a message on my talk page or email

45:

Tankred not even bothers to give some explanation for his revert. He never said that he will be contented with your shorter list. But the shorter list is still surplus information in the article, compromising its concision. And I don't think that I always have to take into consideration the phobias

2130:

Thank you for your kindness. I plan to improve the article as my time allows, it is part of my ongoing work on the pages related to the Basilica of Santa Maria del Popolo which were all written in the past few years. At the moment my primary goal was to separate it from the Prado painting with the

975:

That's always the same story. In 2007 a group of moderate, respected Romanian and Hungarian editors were able to reach a good compromise which lasted for 3 years, a long time for wikipedia standards. I still think that was a generous, European solution but obviously new warriors are coming who are

698:

I understand your concern about edit warring. But you should realise also that until now adding Hungarian names in the former area of the KoH was not seen as problematic and didn't need such precautions. No serious Romanian or Slovak users deleted them as "irrelevant" like Svetovid did. There were

230:

Why do you believe that its meaning has changed? I am not familiar with Budapest slang, but as someone living in Transylvania, I have never associated any negative meanings with "néger". "Nigger" is usually translated as "nigger" (not "néger") in literary works. "Néger" is commonly being used in

3281:

I came across your extensive contributions to the Upper Őrség article, though found that much of the information therein did not have specific inline citations. I would be very curious to read more about the topics you added, particularly regarding phonological shifts. Would you please be able to

956:

deleted all bolded Hungarian names from the articles of the Szekler counties and when I reverted, he started an incident case and as a result of it, the admin ruled that the 2007 compromise is not valid anymore. The change was supported by 3 editors , 2 out of them with account created only days

548:

We don't have to prove village by village that Hungarians lived somewhere in the past. The whole area of the KoH was inhabited by Hungarians (somewhere there were many of them, somewhere less, of course) and every topographical feature had an OFFICIAL Hungarian name. Asking for references to the

60:

I know what you mean, but as someone who is unable to favour Slovaks over Hungarians and vice-versa, I believe that the only way to acheive some kind of stability in this article is to make a compromise. The example with the mountains may not be the best way to think of this language dispute. As

1484:

Segíthetnél rendbeszedni a cikket. Különösen a Military events szekciót kellene röviden tömören, de átfogóan megszerkeszteni. Ha ez megvan a "Hungarian revolution of 1848" cikkben, azután kellene majd két külön bővebb új wiki cikket nyittani a Téli és a Tavaszi hadjáratról is. Több magyar wiki

1897:

Szia! Látom, hogy feltöltöttél egy új képet de ez így nem a legszerencsésebb megoldás. Az új fotó feltöltése funkció arra való hogy ugyanazt a képet töltsd fel újra de jobb minőségben, vagy más képkivágással stb. Most a szószék helyére lett feltöltve a szolnoki ház fotója, és így kialakult egy

245:

Mainstream Hungarian media almost never uses the word today, you won't find it in newspapers, television etc. It is used only by older or lower class people or somebody with a political agenda, mainly as a sign of refusal the politically correct speech. As professional journalist (working in

1946:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2165:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

747:

an anomymus reverting every day teh pictures of Bethlen Gabor and put the Mihail Vitezaiuel there, who actually joined the war as a Hapsburg mercenary and robbed the territory for two years, while the other contributed a lot. I reverted two times, but it happens every Thkns

1898:

redirect a régi fájlnévnél. Ez nem katasztrófa de tisztább megoldás lett volna hagyni hogy töröljék a szószék bemozdult fotóját, és ezt a szolnokit egyszerűen feltölteni új képként. Igazából ezt már sztem ne bolygassuk meg újra, csak a következő alkalmakra mondom.

674:, it is better to provide a source which either shows that the name is used in English sources, or that there is a significant Hungarian population living in that area which uses that name. In the future, as long as you are careful to always provide sources, per 2768:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

607:

I think that the worst way to deal with nationalist users is to follow their standards. I would vote for maintaining the present minority-friendly lead format of the Hungarian articles even in the unlikely case that Hungarian names are deleted everywhere.

623:

If we would be "minority-friendly", we would have German, Hebrew/Yiddish and Romani versions of the name in the lead of Hungarian articles, not Turkish or Serbian ones. In the case of Pécs we are rather talking about historical names than those used by

1774:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

304:

I think you should look up again the source. I can imagine that the author drew comparison between the artistic style of zellige and the Frumuşeni mosaics but in this case you should cite here the whole paragraph so we can establish its real meaning.

135:

My work on articles is random and casual depending on my free time and changing interests. I added my name because some of my edits are probably classified as belonging to the scope of the project, like my present additions to the Budapest articles.

964:

What do you think about this? I see many of the settlements were originally edited by you? If no one shares my opinion or no one believes that a positive result can be achieved, I do not want to spend time on it, I have already spent days, in vain

942:

Hi, I have been working on Hungarian related settlements in Tranylvania, at least until now. I knew that in 2007 there was a kind of compromise with Romanian editors at the Odorhei/Székelyudvarhely discussion page and you were a part of it.

1288:

You've done a terrific job! Now can I suggest that you move all the pictures to the left, because the it puts them adjacent to their name, and makes them easier to identify. It's also the usual way in which such pages are laid out. See

642:

Overkill for a city which was under Ottoman rule for 150 years and it boasts many mosques as its most important monuments? I don't think so. Minority names and historical names are equally important. By the way I repaired the damage that

1733:. For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like 842:

seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the

246:

Budapest) I would never use the word, and my editors would certainly delete it if I did. The connotation changed in the past decades. In Transylvania the original meaning probably remained stronger and the change hasn't happened yet.

662:

Zello, I have blocked Svetovid for one month, for his edit-warring. However, it takes two to edit war, so I would like you to try and change your own behavior as well. For example, it was not good to revert Svetovid's change as

1392: 1388: 2772:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

1637:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1582:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 3161: 2967: 2843: 2765: 2697: 2347: 2193: 1974: 1802: 76:

language article was only meant to prove this superiority theory and contained no information about the topic, the Slovak language itself. It is simply out of place. Comparison for the sake of comparison.

3145:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2951:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2827:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2681:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2331:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2177:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1958:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1786:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 438:

You're welcome, Zello. You've made a good start with the article and it deserves the spotlight on MainPage. We need more good new articles like that in Knowledge. Keep typing and have fun! :-) --

1307:

Thank you very much for the advice! I will do it but I should complete the list at first. It's still a lot of work because of uploading and categorizing the missing pictures in the commons.

586:

Zello, I would rather have alternative names in the lead, Slovak editors were pushing for that solution. I don't mind having that arrangement, but only if it applies to all the cities

26:

Tankred just reverted the Slovak article to include the long-winded list from before (as I strongly suspected he would do.) This sensitivity and instant revert was the main reason why

3130: 2936: 2813: 2667: 2317: 1502:

szia, sajnos én ilyen szervezett munkára nem vagyok alkalmas. néha, amikor kedvem van, belevágok vmibe, és saját szórakozásomra megcsinálom, de ezek általában nem is magyar témák.

3086: 1920: 1913: 1879:

Re: File:Our Lady and St. John of Nepomuk R. C. church. Interior ID 3829. Baroque pulpit with statues. (N). - 2, János Lane Downtown, Székesfehérvár, Fejér County, Hungary.JPG

1734: 1677: 265:

Do you know how to create a stub/subcategory in Hungarian history? I would like to create "Sources of Hungarian History" or similar. The list would be from Anonymus...==: -->

1380: 868:

this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click

1722: 716:

I understand that this has been an ongoing problem for quite awhile. However, it is not helpful to refer to another editor's changes as "vandalism" or "trolling".

1116:, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at 858:, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at 2394: 2257:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with

666:

The word "vandal" is only for very bad cases, such as blanking a page or inserting profanity. What you and Svetovid had was a "content dispute". See also

949:

I worked in compliance with the compromise reached there i.e. if Hungarian population is more than 20%, the Hungarian name should be bolded in the lead.

485: 412: 1068: 1057: 2755: 2497: 2489: 2463: 2031: 1691: 1536: 1451: 1402: 1349: 1255: 490:, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the 2076: 2062: 1433: 1245: 96: 1014: 2087:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and

1339: 1241: 121:

page is now set up. Hope you will be active now :) Even if you're not intrested in the project currently your work on articles is always great.

3248: 1854:

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on

2459: 2027: 1730: 1687: 1532: 1447: 1398: 1345: 1251: 1335: 3184: 2990: 2866: 2719: 2369: 2207: 2069: 1988: 1816: 1742: 1662: 1607: 187:(see the paragraph starting "I suggest cutting the whole Lészai Lehel/Noua Dreaptă part...") Your opinion would be appreciated; thank you. 3091: 2571: 2556: 923:

Please stick around - we are in interesting times. Separately, it seems one of your old friends is also back under a different name!

2750: 2734: 1522: 1072: 1053: 1043: 1024: 2532:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Knowledge's 2390: 2578:

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

183:

section I'd prefer to cut the part beginning "Yet, more recently, the 2008 National Day of Hungarians..." for the reasons outlined

324:

source. I am removing the sentence from the article. Thanks for your concerns and, of course, your patience. Much appreciated. --

2449: 3180: 2986: 2862: 2715: 2607: 2586: 2552: 2365: 2203: 1984: 1812: 1738: 1658: 1603: 549:

obvious is Svetovid's game and quite malicious one. What next? Will he delete every Hungarian name that he feels "irrelevant"?

1395:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1342:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1248:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1726: 1684:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1529:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1444:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1002: 958: 1290: 118: 3154: 3038: 2960: 2836: 2690: 2603: 2582: 2340: 2274: 2186: 2103: 1967: 1840: 1833: 1795: 727: 689: 1649:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

1594:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

423:, where you can improve it if you see fit. If you can add more references to the article, that would be great! Thanks, 3166: 2972: 2848: 2702: 2352: 2198: 1979: 1807: 1654: 1599: 1132: 1010: 2536:

and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.

2383: 350:

to your account? I see you have expressed a desire to do so by reverting vandalism with the currently slow version,

3233: 2886: 2437: 2083:

The Italian article has some sources. Do you think you could add some of those, or use them to rewrite the article?

835: 491: 420: 2017: 320:

Hi Zello. I am sorry for this late reply. I have to agree with you since your points are far more clearer than my

3225: 3077: 3063: 2759: 1218: 1136: 1102: 16: 2445: 3081: 3080:

has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the

2406: 1888: 1039: 1028: 720:

is defined as "deliberate attempts to disrupt the project". I do not believe that Svetovid was doing that. --

1676:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1521:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1432:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1379:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1326:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1232:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2602:

Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

1186:

have you been able to think about nominating the article Buda Castle for a review. Please see the talk page

1109: 801: 771: 744: 632: 595: 573: 539: 236: 2541: 2500:, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from 1117: 847:, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please 462: 416: 1006: 3229: 3142: 3099: 3084:

guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at

2948: 2824: 2678: 2328: 2174: 1955: 1783: 766:

Be careful with 3RR, unfortunately your rewording Abdulka's addition could also be considered a revert.

478: 1101:

on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a

3221: 2525: 2453: 2436:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

2021: 2004:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

1526: 1214: 1195: 1147: 906: 877: 848: 756: 752: 274: 270: 227:

without any negative connotations until the 1990s when its meaning changed under English influence."

192: 126: 104: 1142:

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

2402: 2114: 1884: 1865: 1650: 1595: 1210: 1113: 1098: 505: 161: 3286: 2013: 2266: 2095: 1869: 1859: 1855: 1298: 797: 767: 644: 628: 591: 569: 535: 393: 355: 332: 232: 217: 855: 839: 831: 813: 62: 32: 3290: 3267: 3216: 3124: 3050: 2930: 2905: 2807: 2781: 2661: 2537: 2479: 2311: 2161: 2088: 2047: 1942: 1770: 1752: 1707: 1626: 1617: 1571: 1562: 1552: 1493: 1467: 1418: 1365: 1271: 354:. Rollback is much faster, but you must only use it in cases of reverting vandalism. Regards, 523:

Relevant foreign language names (one used by at least 10% of sources in the English language

3173: 3138: 3095: 2979: 2944: 2855: 2820: 2709: 2674: 2634: 2359: 2324: 2285: 2170: 1951: 1779: 1646: 1630: 1591: 1575: 1187: 928: 724: 686: 667: 443: 428: 184: 3153:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2959:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2835:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2689:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2339:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2185:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1966:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1794:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1645:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1590:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 627:

I think having the Turkish name of Pécs is a little bit overkill even in the Name section.

534:

That's why I gave the reference for Hungarians living there, that makes the name relevant.

1233: 1191: 1143: 1086: 953: 902: 873: 863: 827: 717: 565: 288:

I would like to discuss with you why I think the claim about the Frumuşeni mosaics in the

188: 122: 100: 866:

if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that

2456:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 2024:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. 3150: 2956: 2832: 2686: 2336: 2242: 2227: 2182: 2125: 2110: 2091: 2072: 1963: 1791: 1642: 1634: 1587: 1579: 1124: 671: 501: 351: 347: 224: 157: 66: 36: 1064: 1035: 530:) are permitted and should be listed in alphabetic order of their respective languages 3146: 3016: 3008: 2952: 2828: 2682: 2533: 2470: