251:
actually meant to say what he said, it's relevant to look into whether he holds that common belief, at least subconsciously. A quote from 34 years ago shows that at that time he did think this was what a volunteer army would look like. That doesn't prove he still has that picture in the back of his mind, but it significantly increases the likelihood. The other ills he thought might come from a volunteer army don't shed any light on the current question, so there's no reason to cite them. Indeed, citing them is something of a red herring; it hides the point in verbiage, and distracts the reader with irrelevant matters.
31:
275:
are pushing an ideological viewpoint. Did you read about the part where he says it's disproportionate, and did you ever consider that he was talking about the imbalance of poor people to rich in the military? Or were you just trying to look for that "silver bullet" to make Kerry look bad? Hell, I used to be a
Republican myself, I know (and used to engage) in those tactics.--
973:"hi" on a page, but when you put something vulgar like this editor did, I felt it was warranted. Sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't, but if I was an administrator, I wouldn't block a user with just two vandalisms/edits and never as a punitive block or long term. I hope that gives you more insight on why I did that. Sorry if I seemed to be hasty or in violation of
1112:
remains up to the conscience of the individual Sikh, relying on his own research and understanding to decide whether a particular slaughtering procedure makes meat Kutha. The article is designed to be read by non-Sikhs, and therefore should wherever possible use terms likely to be familiar to a wider audience. Halal is a widely-understood term. Kutha is not. --
1044:
whatsoever. Afterall, vandals shouldn't be given five "tokens" to vandalize. When I first started, I couldn't count the amount of times that I'd use all the warnings, and then at the last warning, the IP would vanish and never make an edit again. It's a waste of time to go through the entire chain for obvious vandals. ā
1018:
I wouldn't have reported them to AIV for a first time warning or blocked them had I been an administrator acting on it, but I highly doubt the user thought the subject of the article was made of poop or penises. But for future situations I will go back to issuing lower warnings first. Unless the user
951:
2. Nope. It was never an option, no matter how theoretical. The kohen's question is not "would you like to redeem him or not?", but rather "which do you value more, your son or the money?". Instead of focusing on how much money he has to pay, he should focus on how little it is compared with what
441:
Hmm?? This statement: "The editor of iSurvived.org (Kalman
Brattman) is presently the subject of a significant news story which outlines how the editor of the site (with his disturbing arrest record) has attempted to destroy the reputation of various Holocaust survivors." sure seems to say something
224:
2. Deleting the second part of the quote which starts off that: "We must not repeat the travesty of the inequities present during
Vietnam. I also fear having a professional army that views the perpetuation of war crimes as simply 'doing its job.'" The second part takes Kerry's quote into context, and
220:
1. We need a source for whoever said that critics claim that Kerry has a record of insulting troops. It's not unreasonable (and is Wiki policy), and it's not difficult to find one critic who agrees with your statement and then include it and attribute it in the article. On the other side, it would be
106:
The fact that it doesn't appear at all in the Bible, but is used extensively in the
Mishnah and Talmud, which also contain many other Greek and Latin loanwords, strongly suggests that it came into Hebrew from Greek or Latin. And since the Latin word came from Greek anyway, I wrote that it came from
972:
I hope I didn't look like I was trying to bite the user, which I wouldn't do intentionally, but I've been noticing lately with a lot of one time vandals that leave really obvious vandalism that if you give them one warning, they stop. I don't do it for most cases like accidents or somebody putting
314:
I think you do need to explain the matter better as it is misleading to those who are unaware of his death date (just in case they overlook it at the top). It might lead someone to believe there is conflicting information on the page. Iām sure you have noticed it by now that I have slightly changed
304:
I don't need to explain anything. You find a page that says an exhibit was held in 2006. If you have reason to believe that it was actually held in 2005, then you should feel free to change it. But if you have no such reason, then you have no business editing the article, based merely on a guess
274:
2. Your reply makes it seem that you want to take the quote out of context and make John Kerry look bad. Whether you like him or not, that's not in accordance with
Knowledge (XXG)'s goals. Your quote about believing he "still has this picture in the back of this mind" strengthens my belief that you
205:
is first attested in Hebrew at a period when it included hundreds of Greek and Latin loanwords. And Latin and Greek definitely had a far greater impact on Hebrew than vice versa, because practically all Hebrew speakers were in contact with Roman soldiers in Judaea, while the vast majority of Latin
110:
Is it possible that it was a Hebrew word that happened not to be used in the Bible (there must have been many such words, which are now completely lost), or that was coined or borrowed after
Biblical times, and that Greek and Latin borrowed it from Hebrew? I guess it's possible, since I don't know
453:
It says nothing of the sort. It doesn't even address the question of links. Nor, even if it did, does a single post by an anonymous poster represent the view of "the majority of editors". On the contrary, the substance of this anonymous person's post is highly debatable, but there's no point in
375:
I apologize for my previous comments and edits. I was merely frustrated at your repeated revisions to the
Shinseki article and was trying to "get your goat". Still no amount of frustration can justify any racist or nationalist comments. If you will allow me, I will work from now on within the
244:
Kerry's previous criticism of USA soldiers is too well-known to need documenting. See Winter
Soldier earlier in the Knowledge (XXG) article, and see his widely reported statement in 2005 that USA troops in Iraq were terrorising women and children. (Now if I were to include those as examples, I
1111:
The question is what exactly counts as Kutha meat. My understanding is that the generally accepted Sikh authorities have ruled that the Zabiha procedure is enough like a sacrifice that it renders the meat Kutha. As far as I know they have not ruled that way about any other kind of meat, so it
250:
2. The rest of the quote isn't relevant here. You seem not to understand for what purpose the quote has been cited. Kerry's original joke seems to refer to a common but erroneous belief that the army is composed primarily of the uneducated, the poor, and minorities. To decide whether Kerry
1043:
I agree with DarthGriz's solo warning - to a degree. If the user added a couple random letters into the article, I could understand starting with a simple test. The uesr made some rather offensive comments. Although I would've preferred to see test3, I don't believe it's a significant issue
270:
1. Have you read
Knowledge (XXG) rules? It doesn't matter what you think here, and it doesn't matter what I think either, because we need verifiable sources. Is it so difficult to find one name (Coulter, Malkin, O'Reilly) and add their specific commentary? I didn't say all, I just said one.
1304:
I don't really care where the uploader got the picture. I want some proof the picture is indeed centuries old. For instance, is it somewhere in a museum, who is the artist, but most importantly when was it made? Right now there is no info on the image, just that it is an image of Rashi.
225:
it's deceitful to readers by withholding part of the truth. What is wrong with letting readers decide their reaction to the quote instead of stacking the cards against Kerry? Also, a personal interpretation of Kerry's statement by deleting part of it is potentially libelous. --
154:
My guess is that whoever put it there in the first place just thought it unlikely that Hebrew and Welsh would have come in contact with each other, or would have a source in common. Except that that isn't the case, at least with regard to
Mishnaic and later
423:
Second, "historical consensus" or not, it's still a relevant point of view. Unless you can prove that its allegations are false, it deserves to be linked. WP is certainly not restricted to a "historical consensus", alleged or real. Why don't you try
401:
Do not add any links to isurvived.org without attaining consensus on the talk page. As you can see if you take a look at it, the majority of editors feel that the link is not appropriate and does not represent the historical consensus on Bingham.
1290:
but I wanted to give the uploader some more time with providing a source. It probably is old and fall in the Public Domain. But we don't know for sure. If you can, please provide a source but don't remove the no source tag unless you do.
1328:. If this picture is so famous it should be quite easy so please go ahead. And yes, I did searched a bit but couldn't find it. The picture needs a source to prove it is public domain. If you want to keep the image, do your own research.
1230:
Knowledge (XXG); it's on hotair, which may or may not have the right to have it. It doesn't matter. There's no policy against citing sources just because they may be in violation of copyright laws. Violating copyright laws (let alone
96:. This is interesting. Could you provide a source for this assertion? Everything I've read says that nobody knows whether the one got it from the other, which way the borrowing went, or if they both borrowed it from somewhere else.
114:
As for the Welsh word, no I have no source for it coming from Greek or Latin, but again it seems almost impossible that it didn't. I think the burden of proof would have to be on someone asserting that it had a different origin.
1418:
I have put it back to standard version that I personally checked over one month ago. There is a anon vandal vandalising 68.241.250.155- check his talk page he has been warned many time. His versions are being reverted by other
605:
First, it's not an extraordinary claim. You seem to think that anything contradicting an existing article constitutes an extraordinary claim; that privileges the opinions of the first poster on a subject, an absurd
947:
gave birth to this, her first born son". I suppose the father of an illegitimate boy is also obligated in pidyon haben, and would have to change the declaration accordingly, but the article describes the standard
111:
the earliest Greek use, but it just doesn't seem to me very likely. In any case, it seems to me extremely unlikely that it developed independently in both Hebrew and Greek, which means it's not a false cognate.
210:
is just another loanword, from either Latin or Greek, and that the burden of proof rests on anyone claiming that it was a native Hebrew word that just happened never to be used by any of the authors of the
266:
First off, your edit history shows a pattern of editing against liberals and progressives and promoting a conservative viewpoints. Do you believe Knowledge (XXG) is a place to promote conservative thought?
221:
akin to me including a statement, "It was obvious that Kerry did not mean that as an attack against the troops, but President Bush." which you would probably revert immediately, claiming the same reason.
239:
one such critic, if you need names! But you know very well that I'm very far from the only one.) I just don't see the point in compiling a list of references to blogs and commenters making this point.
1208:
Copyvio videos are to be removed from Knowledge (XXG), per policy. Anyway, I found the direct transcript and changed the cite, so it's a moot point, but one you should consider in the future. -
748:
1094:
Sikhs are strictly prohibited from eating Halal meat, or any meat during the langar. In some Sikh groups, eating meat is believed to be forbidden, but this is not a universally held belief.
720:
You are the one acting unilaterally here, by deleting the links with no discussion whatsoever. And I'm not going to put up with it. If you want me to agree that the links don't belong,
925:
exists regardless of whether the parents are married. Also, I understand that while as a matter of contemporary civil law and practice a father couldn't legally turn a child over to a
197:
are both attested farther back in their respective languages than the time when they came into such extensive contact. While I guess it's theoretically possible that Hebrew picked up
1388:
Demark - you're correct. That word was not the aim of my edit and it was an oversight not to return the more recent edit of that issue to demarcate. Thank you for correcting it.
1325:
851:
The report above on Kelman Brattman was made by Eric Saul --a purpoted Holocaust educator with no academic credentials that was exposed by no one else but Brattman. Please see
305:
that if the anniversary was in 2005 then the exhibit "must" have been held in that year. Knowledge (XXG) is for facts, or at least alleged facts, not random guesses.
556:
Oh yeah? Take a look at the 9/11 pages; all sorts of conspiracy theories are not only linked to but actually described, together with their evidence or lack thereof.
1238:
And blogs may be less reliable than other sources, but it depends on what it is that's being cited. In this case the video speaks for itself, so it doesn't matter
1101:. On a side note, I thought the word Halal was to be substituted with Kutha (which includes any ritually slaughtered meat? Its the Sikh term. Just a thought. --
315:
the sentence to show the difference. You are correct in saying āKnowledge (XXG) is for factsā. So present all the facts the next time you try to edit a page. (
349:
showed up, vandalised 9 pages I'd edited, and left a racist comment on this page. I don't think it takes a genius to say that all three are the same person.
1242:
it's being hosted. It could be hosted on my own server, in flagrant violation of all sorts of laws, and it would still be perfectly valid to cite it on WP.
1150:
which needs to be addressed on the talk page rather than through constant moving and reverting. The protection wasn't an endorsement of the current title.
179:
may. I'm not trying to push it too hard, it's just that everything I've read says that "nobody knows", just like origin of Greek oine vs. Hebrew yayin.
545:
I may think that 9/11 was a Ugandan conspiracy and put up a website supporting my view, but that wouldn't justify my adding that info to Knowledge (XXG).
151:
false cognates? If not, then it seems to me that including them on the page in the first place is "original research", which I have merely corrected...
1321:
384:
Thanks. Knew it had nothing to do with Chabad, but remembered reading that Nusach Sfard was started by the Baal Shem Tov based upon Ari. --
342:
334:
1212:
19:57, 12 June 2007 (UTC) BTW, blogs are not reliable sources, and I will not allow them to be used as sources in the Thompson articles.
1058:
I agree with that AIV rationale. I'm an admin, so I naturally have a different outlook than those who have to go through the channel. ā
346:
1287:
428:
the "soapbox" guideline you kindly linked to, and explain exactly how I am violating it. In the meantime, I am restoring the links.
819:
It has become clear that you are utterly unwilling to respect Knowledge (XXG) procedure on this point. I am bringing this up at the
359:
492:
And Knowledge (XXG) does not seek to show all points of view on issues, simply the general consensus point of view and other views
293:ā Read the comments better next time. You need to explain the fact that it was held in 2006 for the 2005 anniversary of his death.(
709:, but unilateral moves against consensus with comments like "i say the links belong here" are very unlikely to get you anywhere.
1194:
469:
It says nothing of the sort? I lifted that exact quote off the page! I agree with that editor as well, there's two, as did
1344:
but I didn't. Since I didn't delete it, I added the nosource tag to give more time. Assume a bit good faith here thank you.
363:
118:
Be that as it may, "strongly suggests" is not an acceptable rationale to make an assertion and call it fact. Do you have a
591:
345:
appeared, vandalised six pages I'd edited, with no other activity. Then on the same day, between 23:38 and 23:52 (UTC),
998:
I have also added an apology on the IP talk page, I feel I may have been too hasty and will not be such in the future.
235:
1. The news is full of critics. You can't deny that they exist, or that they've made this argument. (For that matter,
1372:
has vandalised my page once already and seems to be treating the wikipedia NPOV with contempt. Shall I report him? --
38:
1270:
I wasn't speculating about your background, I was speculating the other contributors based on his information. --
902:
I get the feeling you're the sort that proves Godwin's law true very often. Do you have Aspergers, or something?
79:
71:
66:
362:
showed up, reverted one edit of mine, and then proceeded to vandalise this page, thus demonstrating his lack of
206:
and Greek speakers had little or no contact with Jews. It seems to me that the default assumption must be that
126:
that says that the one was borrowed from the other? Otherwise what you've done is technically a violation of
751:. Consensus clearly is against the site at the moment. The responsibility of changing that lies with you. -
1076:
1019:
is a repeat vandal and has been reverted many times but with no warning, then the user does need a test4.
1320:
for instance. I guess those other images also will be tagged eventually. A good example how it should is
873:
be referenced in the article of the body of music which he has contributed so much to over his lifetime?
702:
1167:
Google R' Yosef Yitzchok Schneersohn, and you will get more results than R' Joseph Isaac Schneersohn. --
1154:
1027:
1006:
985:
779:
771:
706:
1147:
903:
894:
874:
1398:
1182:
385:
1280:
571:
Those theories are notable and their prevalence has been attested to by multiple reliable sources. -
1430:
1420:
1063:
1049:
840:
744:
645:
1317:
1286:
The uploader was of course already asked and I could have deleted the image after being listed at
1348:
1332:
1309:
1295:
1190:
694:
316:
294:
183:
134:
100:
1369:
1363:
1340:
If I would have wanted to delete the image I could have already done so after it was listed at
1373:
1130:
1102:
934:
843:
is a Sock Puppet and Kelman Brattman. Disseminating false information for personal attacks.
974:
820:
123:
1271:
1168:
1151:
1022:
1001:
980:
824:
783:
752:
675:
626:
572:
527:
474:
407:
395:
1341:
1213:
403:
127:
1429:
Hi, I've reverted anon vandalism again and put it back to your last addition on 12 July.--
291:
If it was held in 2006 to commemorate his 900th b-day in 2005, I'm sorry for changing it.
47:
17:
775:
659:
And I don't know whether you are the Emperor Napoleon. But the odds are that you're not.
523:
119:
496:
A link to such a dubious website certainly does not support the notability of this view.
337:
appeared, vandalised five pages that I had edited, made a racist comment in his edit of
1255:
1217:
1209:
1060:
1046:
172:
507:
It's certainly worth a link. Pretending that it doesn't exist is outright censorship.
1345:
1329:
1306:
1292:
1186:
470:
276:
226:
180:
176:
131:
97:
778:
for general questions about consensus building and Knowledge (XXG) procedure, or at
922:
915:
147:
Better question: does anyone have a souce they can cite showing that the two words
858:
420:
on the talk page about the appropriateness of links to isurvived.org. Not a word.
333:
I seem to have picked up a stalker. On 28-Dec-06, between 00:34 and 00:47 (UTC),
1405:
1389:
338:
107:
Greek, which I think is a fair way of putting it even if the path was via Latin.
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
1433:
1423:
1408:
1392:
1376:
1351:
1335:
1312:
1298:
1274:
1258:
1248:
1220:
1198:
1171:
1157:
1133:
1116:
1105:
1067:
1053:
1034:
1013:
992:
958:
937:
906:
897:
887:
877:
827:
802:
786:
755:
678:
629:
575:
530:
477:
432:
410:
388:
370:
353:
319:
309:
297:
279:
259:
245:
would have to document them, since they're statements of fact, not of opinion.)
229:
1404:
The relevancy here is that his position is the prevailing one on this issue.
1245:
1113:
955:
884:
799:
429:
406:
for the dissemination of minority viewpoints on this kind of issue. Thanks. -
367:
350:
306:
256:
168:
883:
Very funny. But if you continue vandalising WP, you will be blocked. --
852:
473:, to the extent that he blocked Webville for repeatedly adding the link! -
341:, and disappeared. Then on the same day, between 10:03 and 10:07 (UTC),
201:
from the Philistines, and hence from Greek, that would need proof. But
930:
870:
594:. isurvived.org certainly does not qualify as "exceptional evidence."
933:
is concerned the choice is still a theoretical possibility. Best, --
869:
How can you refuse to let an Irish musician of such significance as
625:
falls under bullet points one, three, and four. Please read them. -
743:
No discussion? The matter has been discussed on the talk page, at
697:, where this issue was debated. I am willing to reopen this issue
648:, who embarked on a similar crusade against Bingham some months ago
926:
844:
1382:
317:!Mi luchador nombre es amoladora de la carne y traigo el dolor!
295:!Mi luchador nombre es amoladora de la carne y traigo el dolor!
853:
The Eric Saul Case: An Issue of Credibility and Accountability
25:
674:
The similarity of your actions is rather suspicious though. -
454:
debating it here since it's irrelevant to the current matter.
1235:
violating them) doesn't affect the reliability of a source.
1254:
You're absolutely wrong. See my reply on my talk page. -
289:
You obviously did not read part of my original comment: ā
93:
1326:
Image:Elizabeth I of England - coronation portrait.jpg
442:
about the appropriateness of links to isurvived.org.
1121:Good point. On a side note.Is the Current title
943:1. The father's declaration says "My Israelite
1085:Just a couple of comments about above topic.
782:for debate specific to this issue. Regards,
8:
526:. "It exists" does not justify inclusion. -
128:Knowledge (XXG)'s ban on "original research"
728:, instead of acting as if you own the page.
1318:Knowledge (XXG):Images#Uploading images
1322:Image:Elizabeth I Darnley Portrait.jpg
1288:Knowledge (XXG):Possibly unfree images
376:constraints of Knowledge (XXG). -- SR
94:that hebrew awir comes from greek awer
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
859:Eric Saul's beef with Isurvived.org
24:
1183:Talk:Mill (currency)#Recent edit
921:Hi! I believe the obligation of
701:that is, if you attempt to gain
404:Knowledge (XXG) is not a soapbox
29:
644:I do not know whether you are
1:
888:02:44, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
878:01:36, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
693:but if not, please check out
389:13:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
371:02:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
354:00:40, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
320:23:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
310:23:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
298:22:40, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
185:01:26, August 22, 2005 (UTC)
102:20:31, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
1216:will be strictly applied. -
893:Get a sense of humor, boyo.
828:12:14, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
803:07:12, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
787:03:48, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
756:12:14, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
679:12:14, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
630:12:14, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
576:12:14, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
531:12:14, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
478:12:14, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
433:02:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
411:01:52, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
358:UPDATE: On 20-Dec at 01:57,
280:10:09, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
260:08:49, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
230:08:23, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
136:20:49, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
1181:You might be interested in
821:administrator's noticeboard
1450:
1172:13:21, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
1158:05:10, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
1134:10:29, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
1434:03:08, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
1424:13:19, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
1377:14:06, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
1352:22:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
1336:22:23, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
1313:21:59, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
1299:21:42, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
1275:17:01, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
1259:20:19, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
1249:20:09, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
1221:20:01, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
1117:18:58, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
1106:09:46, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
1097:Shouldn't the title read
1068:03:22, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
1054:01:57, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
1035:00:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
1014:00:16, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
993:00:09, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
959:06:17, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
952:he has received from God.
938:05:16, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
907:14:54, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
898:03:02, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
1409:17:06, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
1393:16:51, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
1199:06:46, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
1146:There appeared to be an
770:Feel free to comment on
699:through proper channels,
845:Kalman Brattman Report
780:Talk:Hiram Bingham IV
88:avir comes from greek
42:of past discussions.
1399:Yosef Eliyahu Henkin
1077:Sikhism Prohibitions
167:does, just not me.
1406:Juda S. Engelmayer
1390:Juda S. Engelmayer
861:that says it all.
695:User talk:Webville
524:Knowledge (XXG):NN
1099:Eating Halal Meat
724:have to persuade
494:that are notable.
85:
84:
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1441:
1226:The video isn't
1163:Der Rebbe Rayatz
1030:
1025:
1009:
1004:
988:
983:
865:Music of Ireland
416:First, there is
396:Hiram Bingham IV
63:
56:
55:
33:
32:
26:
1449:
1448:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1440:
1439:
1438:
1416:
1402:
1386:
1367:
1284:
1281:Image:Rashi.jpg
1266:
1206:
1179:
1177:Mill (currency)
1165:
1144:
1088:Line 10 reads:
1080:
1028:
1023:
1007:
1002:
986:
981:
970:
919:
867:
590:Take a look at
399:
386:ChosidFrumBirth
382:
343:172.201.220.183
331:
287:
218:
90:
59:
30:
22:
21:
20:
18:User talk:Zsero
12:
11:
5:
1447:
1445:
1437:
1436:
1431:Sikh historian
1421:Sikh historian
1419:wikipedians.--
1415:
1412:
1401:
1396:
1385:
1380:
1366:
1360:
1359:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1283:
1278:
1269:
1265:
1262:
1252:
1251:
1243:
1236:
1205:
1202:
1178:
1175:
1164:
1161:
1143:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1079:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1070:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
969:
966:
964:
962:
961:
953:
949:
918:
913:
911:
891:
890:
866:
863:
849:
848:
847:
837:
836:
835:
834:
833:
832:
831:
830:
810:
809:
808:
807:
806:
805:
792:
791:
790:
789:
765:
764:
763:
762:
761:
760:
759:
758:
734:
733:
732:
731:
730:
729:
713:
712:
711:
710:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
652:
651:
650:
649:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
598:
597:
596:
595:
585:
584:
583:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
557:
549:
548:
547:
546:
540:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
500:
499:
498:
497:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
446:
445:
444:
443:
436:
435:
421:
398:
394:Your edits to
392:
381:
378:
335:172.209.253.72
330:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
286:
283:
268:
267:
263:
262:
253:
252:
247:
246:
241:
240:
217:
214:
213:
212:
173:User:Dbachmann
161:
160:
159:
158:
157:
156:
152:
140:
139:
138:
137:
112:
108:
89:
86:
83:
82:
77:
74:
69:
64:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1446:
1435:
1432:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1422:
1413:
1411:
1410:
1407:
1400:
1397:
1395:
1394:
1391:
1384:
1381:
1379:
1378:
1375:
1371:
1365:
1361:
1353:
1350:
1347:
1343:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1334:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1311:
1308:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1297:
1294:
1289:
1282:
1279:
1277:
1276:
1273:
1263:
1261:
1260:
1257:
1250:
1247:
1244:
1241:
1237:
1234:
1229:
1225:
1224:
1223:
1222:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1203:
1201:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1184:
1176:
1174:
1173:
1170:
1162:
1160:
1159:
1156:
1153:
1149:
1141:
1135:
1132:
1129:acceptable.--
1128:
1126:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1115:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1104:
1100:
1095:
1093:
1089:
1086:
1083:
1078:
1075:
1069:
1066:
1065:
1062:
1057:
1056:
1055:
1052:
1051:
1048:
1042:
1041:
1036:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1026:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1005:
997:
996:
995:
994:
991:
990:
989:
984:
976:
967:
965:
960:
957:
954:
950:
946:
942:
941:
940:
939:
936:
932:
928:
924:
917:
914:
912:
909:
908:
905:
900:
899:
896:
889:
886:
882:
881:
880:
879:
876:
872:
864:
862:
860:
855:
854:
846:
842:
841:User:Webville
839:
838:
829:
826:
822:
818:
817:
816:
815:
814:
813:
812:
811:
804:
801:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
788:
785:
781:
777:
776:the help desk
773:
769:
768:
767:
766:
757:
754:
750:
746:
745:User:Webville
742:
741:
740:
739:
738:
737:
736:
735:
727:
723:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
708:
707:the talk page
704:
700:
696:
692:
691:
690:
689:
680:
677:
673:
672:
671:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
647:
646:User:Webville
643:
642:
641:
640:
631:
628:
624:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
615:
614:
613:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
599:
593:
589:
588:
587:
586:
577:
574:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
564:
563:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
544:
543:
542:
541:
532:
529:
525:
521:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
495:
491:
490:
489:
488:
479:
476:
472:
471:User:Shimgray
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
440:
439:
438:
437:
434:
431:
427:
422:
419:
415:
414:
413:
412:
409:
405:
397:
393:
391:
390:
387:
379:
377:
373:
372:
369:
365:
361:
356:
355:
352:
348:
347:84.13.136.207
344:
340:
336:
328:
321:
318:
313:
312:
311:
308:
303:
302:
301:
299:
296:
292:
284:
282:
281:
278:
272:
265:
264:
261:
258:
255:
254:
249:
248:
243:
242:
238:
234:
233:
232:
231:
228:
222:
215:
209:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
187:
186:
184:
182:
178:
177:User:Mustafaa
174:
170:
166:
153:
150:
146:
145:
144:
143:
142:
141:
135:
133:
129:
125:
121:
117:
116:
113:
109:
105:
104:
103:
101:
99:
95:
87:
81:
78:
75:
73:
70:
68:
65:
62:
58:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1417:
1403:
1387:
1374:Sikh-history
1368:
1285:
1267:
1253:
1239:
1232:
1227:
1207:
1180:
1166:
1145:
1131:Sikh-history
1124:
1122:
1103:Sikh-history
1098:
1096:
1092:Eating meat.
1091:
1090:
1087:
1084:
1081:
1059:
1045:
1021:
1020:
1000:
999:
979:
978:
971:
963:
948:declaration.
944:
935:Shirahadasha
929:, so far as
923:Pidyon HaBen
920:
916:Pidyon HaBen
910:
901:
892:
868:
856:
850:
772:my talk page
725:
721:
698:
622:
606:proposition.
592:this section
493:
425:
417:
400:
383:
374:
357:
332:
290:
288:
273:
269:
236:
223:
219:
207:
202:
198:
194:
190:
189:Except that
164:
162:
148:
91:
60:
43:
37:
1272:Shuliavrumi
1152:John Reaves
904:68.98.50.49
895:68.98.50.49
875:68.98.50.49
825:Elmer Clark
784:Elmer Clark
753:Elmer Clark
676:Elmer Clark
627:Elmer Clark
573:Elmer Clark
528:Elmer Clark
522:Please see
475:Elmer Clark
408:Elmer Clark
360:84.13.4.119
339:John Monash
285:Rashi B-day
36:This is an
968:Re-warning
364:good faith
216:Two points
1370:Sikh4life
1364:Sikh4life
1264:The Rebbe
1256:Crockspot
1218:Crockspot
1210:Crockspot
857:See also
703:consensus
169:User:Angr
163:I'm sure
92:You said
80:ArchiveĀ 5
72:ArchiveĀ 3
67:ArchiveĀ 2
61:ArchiveĀ 1
1346:Garion96
1330:Garion96
1307:Garion96
1293:Garion96
1233:possibly
1189:(ēēPK) (
1187:ChoChoPK
1148:edit war
277:Folksong
227:Folksong
165:somebody
122:you can
1195:contrib
1123:Eating
1061:Deckill
1047:Deckill
975:WP:BITE
931:Halakha
871:50 Cent
623:clearly
426:reading
418:nothing
329:Stalker
155:Hebrew.
39:archive
1349:(talk)
1342:WP:PUI
1333:(talk)
1310:(talk)
1296:(talk)
1214:WP:BLP
1155:(talk)
747:, and
380:Chabad
211:Bible.
120:source
1362:User
1246:Zsero
1240:where
1169:Shuli
1142:Reply
1127:Meat
1125:Halal
1114:Zsero
1082:Hi ,
1024:Darth
1003:Darth
982:Darth
956:Zsero
927:Kohen
885:Zsero
800:Zsero
621:This
430:Zsero
368:Zsero
351:Zsero
307:Zsero
257:Zsero
199:yayin
191:yayin
181:Tomer
132:Tomer
98:Tomer
16:<
1383:Eruv
1324:and
1268:BS"D
1191:talk
1185:. --
1029:griz
1008:griz
987:griz
945:wife
749:here
208:avir
203:avir
195:oine
193:and
124:cite
823:. -
774:or
722:you
705:on
366:.
237:I'm
175:or
171:or
149:are
130:.
1414:Hi
1228:on
1204:No
1197:)
1193:|
1064:er
1050:er
977:.
726:me
300:)
76:ā
322:)
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.