163:
of the Lex
Hortensia) there were thirty-five plebiscites which had the force of law. He argues that the law of 449 BC probably established the general principle, “but in some way restricted its freedom to do so, for instance, by making the plebiscites subject to the auctoritas partum or to the subsequent vote of the comitia populi, or indeed both.” Auctoritas patrum meant authority of the fathers (the patricians) through the patrician-controlled senate. This would explain the difficulties in getting proposals passed into law, such as the various failed attempts at agrarian reform to help the poor, which must have had the support of the poor plebeians and the Plebeian Council. The law of 339 BC might have partially removed these restrictions and that of 287 BC probably abolished them altogether and, therefore these two laws were not repetitions, but re-enactments which introduced specific amendments which decreased patrician obstruction of the plebiscites. This could be possible as the sources do not provide the ‘detailed provisions of these laws.’
114:(494 BC). The patricians were excluded from the Plebeian Council. The Council could also vote on laws which concerned the plebeians. It was convened and presided over by the plebeian tribunes, positions which had been created during the first plebeian rebellion. These tribunes proposed resolutions to the vote of the Council. These plebeian institutions were created for the self-defence of the plebeians against abuse by the consuls and the Roman aristocracy and were separate from the institutions of the patrician-controlled Roman senate. The patricians refused to recognise the Council's resolutions as laws binding on the whole people and therefore on the patricians as well. Livy wrote that as “it was as it were a point in controversy, whether patricians were bound by regulations enacted in an assembly of the commons, they proposed a law in the assembly of the centuries , that whatever the commons ordered collectively, should bind the entire people; by which law a most keen-edged weapon was given to motions introduced by tribunes."
159:
that the purpose of the
Valerio-Horatian Law was “not to grant the right of appeal per se , but to prohibit the creation of magistracies not subject to appeal,” and that we do not know anything about the content of the law of 300 BC. He notes that Livy said that Marcus Valerius Corvus’ law of appeal had was ‘more carefully set down’ and that this must be in comparison with previous laws on appeal. Livy also wrote “this was the third time since the expulsion of the kings that such a law had been introduced, by the same family in every instance” He specified that the second and third laws were renewals and said that he thought that the reason for this was that the wealth of a few carried more power than the liberty of the plebs. He added that the law forbade the scourging or execution of those who appealed, but merely provided that if anyone should disregard injunctions it should be deemed a wicked act.
98:. The plebeians seceded to Mons Sacer (Sacred Mount) outside the city and pledged to remain there until their demands were met. Their demands were the resignation of the decemviri, the restoration of the right to appeal to the people and the restoration of the plebeian tribunes and their powers. Lucius Valerius and Marcus Horatius, two patricians who had stood up to one instance of abuse of a plebeian by the decemviri and had shown sympathy towards the plebeians, were sent to Mons Sacer negotiate. The negotiations were successful, the decemviri resigned and the secession was called off. Lucius Valerius and Marcus Horatius were elected as the consuls for the year. They restored the right to appeal to the people and passed measures which were favourable to the plebeians to address their grievances which had emerged during the rebellion.
120:. This was restoration of the right of appeal to the people (provocatio ad populum), which means calling out to the people. A citizen could call out to the people against the summary use of power against him by the consuls or officials. With this type of appeal the summary action undertaken would be stopped. This law also forbade the creation of any official positions that were exempt from the people’s right of appeal. Livy stated that through this law the right of appeal to the people “was not only restored but strengthened for the future by a fresh enactment. This forbade the appointment of any magistrate from whom there was no right of appeal, and provided that anyone who did so appoint might be rightly and lawfully put to death, nor should the man who put him to death be held guilty of murder.”
134:) of the plebeian tribunes, the aediles (the assistants of the tribunes) and the decemviri into law. This principle was based on the lex sacrata (sacred law), which was a religious sanction according to which a temple, sacred object or person could be declared physically inviolable (sacrosanct). According to Festus "Sacred laws are laws which have the sanction that anyone who broke them becomes accursed to one of the gods, together with his family and property". The violator became sacer (accursed), was considered as having harmed a god or the gods in addition to the sacrosanct object or person, became forfeit to the god(s), anyone who killed him/her was performing sacred duty and would not be punished and the dead violator was surrendered to the god(s) in question.
78:, the patricians gave “consent to the appointment of a body of legislators, chosen in equal numbers from plebeians and patricians to enact what would be useful to both orders and secure equal liberty for each.” The plebeians wanted a published set of laws so that there were clear and known rules and protections as well as punishments. Up until that time, the laws were unwritten and open to arbitrary use and, at times, abuse. A ten-man commission was appointed to develop the laws, the
138:
deemed as summary and harmful to individual plebeians. This power rested on the principle that the person of the plebeian tribune was sacrosanct. Anyone who hurt him would be declared sacer. In effect this meant that the plebeians swore to kill whoever hurt their tribunes and this was given a religious basis. The plebeians undertook to protect their protectors.
155:
Valerius Corvus in 300 BC. Two other laws which provided for the plebiscites to be binding on the whole people were also proposed, one by
Quintus Publilius Philo in 339 BC and one by Quintus Hortensius in 287 BC. This has led some historians to argue that in both cases the first and second laws are unhistorical and that only the third one is historical.
162:
Regarding the law on plebiscites constituting laws binding the whole people, Cornell, again, thinks that the record of three subsequent laws on the same subject need not imply that the first two were unhistorical. He notes that between 449 BC (the year of the Lex
Valeria-Horatia) and 287 BC (the year
93:
It was felt that two more laws were needed to complete the legislation. A new decemvirate was elected. According to Livy, the second decemvirate was despotic and abused the people, taking advantage of their exemption from the right to appeal. This eventually led to the plebeian rebellion known as the
137:
The principle of the inviolability of the plebeian tribunes had been established following the first plebeian rebellion. Besides being the leaders of the plebeians, the plebeian tribunes were the protectors of the plebeians. They had the power to stop actions by the consuls or officials which they
158:
Cornell disputes the above view. He points out that Roman legislators repeatedly dealt with the same subject and incorporated the provisions of the existing law into the amendments or the new provisions of a new law. He argues that it cannot be proved that the three laws on appeal were identical,
154:
In both the case of the law on the right of appeal and that on the plebiscites, there were three instances of such law. There were two other laws on appeal which were proposed by two consuls who were also members of the
Valeria family, one by Publius Valerius Publicola in 509 BC and one by Marcus
141:
Livy said that the consuls renewed the potestas tribunicia “with certain sacred rites revived from a distant past, and in addition to securing their inviolability by the sanctions of religion, they enacted a law that whoever offered violence to the magistrates of the plebs, whether tribunes,
90:(the representatives of the plebeians) were suspended. The decemviri were also to act as a government exempt from the right to appeal to the people against arbitrary actions on their part. The conduct of the first decemvirate was exemplary and it drew up ten bronze tablets of laws.
58:, which overthrew the second decemvirate, which had ruled tyrannically. The two consuls had shown sympathy towards the plebeians and, as a result, had been chosen to negotiate the resolution of the rebellion. Their new laws quelled the plebeian unrest.
109:
This established that the resolutions passed by the
Plebeian Council were binding on all. The plebeians had created this body as their own assembly where they could debate their own issues during their first rebellion, the
314:
The meaning of this term is uncertain. Cornell rules our that it meant veto of laws and thinks that it meant confirmation that the law did not contain religious flaws. Cornell, T.J., p 341
54:. They restored the right of appeal to the people and introduced measures which were favourable to the plebeians. The consuls' actions came after a plebeian rebellion, the
79:
339:
146:, or decemviral judges, his person should be devoted to Jupiter, his possessions sold and the proceeds assigned to the temple of Ceres, Liber, and Libera …”.
130:
tribunicia, the powers of the plebeian tribunes (often referred to as tribunician powers). It also put in place the principle of the inviolability (
344:
47:
71:
51:
67:
111:
95:
349:
87:
55:
35:
333:
131:
17:
233:
Beloch, Romische
Geschichte bis zum Beginn der punischen Kriege, 1896, p. 326
127:
75:
86:(the office of the two annually elected heads of the republic) and the
143:
83:
43:
242:
Drummond A., Cambridge
Ancient History2 VII.2 1989, pp. 113-142
251:
Forsythe, G., A Critical
History of Early Rome, pp. 223-324
269:
De
Sanctis, G., Storia dei Romani, II (1960), pp. 49-50
42:) were three laws which were passed by the consuls of
323:Cornell,T. J., The Beginnings of Rome, pp. 277-278
287:Ogilvie, R.M., A Commentary on Livy, (1965) p. 252
215:Cornell, T.J., The Beginnings of Rome, pp. 259-260
260:Pais, E. Storia crtica di Roma, II (1913), p. 465
206:Festus, On the meaning of words, Epitome of Paul
80:Decemviri Legibus Scribundis Consulari Imperio
66:In 450 BC, during what was to be the 200-year
296:Cornell,T. J., The Beginnings of Rome, p. 277
8:
124:Lex Valeria Horatia de tribunicia potestate.
278:Staveley, E. S, Historia (1955), p. 412-14
172:
7:
340:4th century BC in the Roman Republic
305:Livy, The History of Rome, 10.9.3-6
224:Livy, The History of Rome, 3.55.6-8
197:Livy, The History of Rome, 3.55.4-5
118:Lex Valeria Horatia de provocatione
107:Lex Valeria Horatia de plebiscitis.
25:
188:Livy, A History of Rome, 3.55.3-4
179:Livy, The History of Rome, 3.31.7
48:Lucius Valerius Poplicola Potitus
82:(decemviri means ten men). The
1:
345:Reform in the Roman Republic
366:
150:Views of modern historians
96:second plebeian secession
56:second plebeian secession
112:first plebeian secession
52:Marcus Horatius Barbatus
40:leges Valeriae Horatiae
126:This law restored the
68:Conflict of the Orders
39:
32:Valerio-Horatian laws
18:Valerio-Horatian Laws
27:Ancient Roman laws
88:plebeian tribunes
16:(Redirected from
357:
324:
321:
315:
312:
306:
303:
297:
294:
288:
285:
279:
276:
270:
267:
261:
258:
252:
249:
243:
240:
234:
231:
225:
222:
216:
213:
207:
204:
198:
195:
189:
186:
180:
177:
21:
365:
364:
360:
359:
358:
356:
355:
354:
330:
329:
328:
327:
322:
318:
313:
309:
304:
300:
295:
291:
286:
282:
277:
273:
268:
264:
259:
255:
250:
246:
241:
237:
232:
228:
223:
219:
214:
210:
205:
201:
196:
192:
187:
183:
178:
174:
169:
152:
104:
64:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
363:
361:
353:
352:
347:
342:
332:
331:
326:
325:
316:
307:
298:
289:
280:
271:
262:
253:
244:
235:
226:
217:
208:
199:
190:
181:
171:
170:
168:
165:
151:
148:
132:sacrosanctitas
103:
100:
63:
60:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
362:
351:
348:
346:
343:
341:
338:
337:
335:
320:
317:
311:
308:
302:
299:
293:
290:
284:
281:
275:
272:
266:
263:
257:
254:
248:
245:
239:
236:
230:
227:
221:
218:
212:
209:
203:
200:
194:
191:
185:
182:
176:
173:
166:
164:
160:
156:
149:
147:
145:
139:
135:
133:
129:
125:
121:
119:
115:
113:
108:
101:
99:
97:
91:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
61:
59:
57:
53:
49:
45:
41:
37:
33:
19:
319:
310:
301:
292:
283:
274:
265:
256:
247:
238:
229:
220:
211:
202:
193:
184:
175:
161:
157:
153:
140:
136:
123:
122:
117:
116:
106:
105:
92:
70:between the
65:
46:for 449 BC,
31:
29:
334:Categories
167:References
84:consulship
72:patricians
62:Background
350:Roman law
76:plebeians
128:potestas
102:The laws
74:and the
144:aediles
36:Latin
50:and
44:Rome
30:The
336::
38::
34:(
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.