Knowledge (XXG)

Variations in published cricket statistics

Source πŸ“

227:
that was employed through the 20th century to the present. Many early cards gave no details of dismissal. Where dismissal was recorded, it was limited to the primary mode and so a fielder would be credited with a catch but the bowler would not be credited with the wicket unless he bowled out the batsman. MCC finally responded to the problem in 1836 when they decided to include in their own scorecards (i.e., for matches played at Lord's) the addition of bowlers' names when the dismissal was caught, stumped, lbw or hit wicket. Haygarth comments that "this was a vast improvement in recording the game and but justice to the bowler". As a result, scorecards became more detailed through the second half of the 19th century but reliability remained a problem and different versions continued to appear. It was some time before the MCC scorecard standard was adopted throughout the country and the inclusion of bowling analyses "was not introduced until several years afterwards".
1514:
regarded, at the time it was played, as first-class and until a little while ago had been left in undisputed possession of that rank, the need for raising any question about the matter after more than twenty years is not at all obvious. In any circumstances, I should not advise the dragging up of what, with all due respect to the recent ruling of the South African Board, must remain a debatable matter. The Reef team included some Test match players and others who had appeared in Inter-State games so it certainly had considerable claims to be regarded as first-class and from that standing, I cannot, all things considered, agree after such a long lapse of time to reduce it. Outside the merits of the case, is there not something rather grotesque in the idea of a controlling body sitting in solemn conclave over so small a matter and deciding to upset what had been accepted for twenty years?
1543: 569: 159: 1176: 756: 451:
totals played before 1864 (Webber's main reason for adopting that date), and so his startpoint was not really an issue in that context. It does, however, exclude numerous leading players and it impacts other cricket records: if first-class cricket did not begin until 1864, then legendary cricketers like
2011:
A key point is that Test cricket is a form of first-class cricket, but is a different form of competition within the concept to, say, the County Championship or the Ranji Trophy. Although several international matches had taken place before 1890, it was not until then that the term "Test cricket" was
1155:
Another dubious match in 1873 is the one between an amateur team made up of those who had toured Canada and the USA in August and September 1872 and an XV of the MCC. Odds matches are not usually regarded as first-class, but there are exceptions, including two England v XIII of Kent matches played in
674:
W. G. Grace began his senior career in 1865 and continued through a record-equalling 44 seasons to 1908. There is general agreement about the status of his matches after the 1895 watershed, but a measure of disagreement about the status of some of his earlier matches. Grace's "original" career totals
450:
The issue with using any cut-off date as a startpoint is that it excludes everything before that date, despite cricket's history making clear that there has been a continuous standard of top-class cricket in England since the late 17th century. It is true that none of the cricketers with large career
402:
From 1996, the ACS produced a further series of booklets giving complete scorecards of matches from 1801 that it now considered first-class. The ACS gave in its journal a number of reasons for taking its startpoint back from 1864 to 1801, among them an agreement with Frindall's view that the standard
1595:
Hobbs himself did not consider these matches to be first-class: "'Don't include those,' he told the late John Arlott.' They were exhibition matches. Vizzy wanted to list our hundreds on the walls of his pavilion. We knew we'd got to score hundreds - so did the bowling side. They were not first-class
415:
fixtures that began in 1806. It chose 1801 as a date of convenience, and thereby set up a division between the 18th and 19th centuries, which was contested by several people (including many ACS members) who recognised 1772 as the startpoint given the availability of data in surviving scorecards from
348:
and, in his introduction, expressed the view that "first-class records should commence in 1864". A number of sources have agreed with this date. Webber then commenced a review of 19th century matches and later published his version of Grace's career record, declaring that Ashley-Cooper had allocated
98:
It was inevitable that historians and statisticians would seek to apply unofficial first-class status retrospectively, despite the ICC and MCC's directives. The position is that each writer must compile their own list based on personal opinion: as a result, significant differences may be observed in
1151:
Then, having included the three 1873 matches, Ashley-Cooper did the same for two similar matches in the 1872 season: Hertfordshire v MCC and another North v. South filler on 27 July. This is difficult to justify, since these matches were not included in Grace's first-class totals that appear in the
1084:
One aspect of Ashley-Cooper's analysis that must be questioned is his assertion that the performances of Grace in a certain match should be regarded as first-class but that performances by other players should not. Clearly, if a match is first-class, then all players taking part must have the match
803:
brought out a wine glass for Hobbs to enjoy a celebratory drink (as he was a teetotaler, it is reputed that the glass contained only ginger ale). As Hobbs had been near to his century the previous evening, the press were present in large numbers. They departed with their stories and on the next day
779:
At the time, it was widely if not universally accepted that Grace's list of centuries included a score of 152 in 1873 for the Gentlemen to Canada Touring Team v XV of MCC, and a score of 113 in 1879 for Gloucestershire v Somerset. Later statisticians have challenged the status of these two matches,
494:
The fire at Lord's occurred on the night of 28 July 1825, when the pavilion burned down and many invaluable and irreplaceable records were lost. It is believed that these included unique scorecards of early matches. The main difficulty encountered by researchers is the absence of match details from
94:
The absence of any ruling about matches played prior to 1947 (or prior to 1895 in Great Britain) has caused problems for cricket historians and especially statisticians. Matches that are believed to have met the official definitions, assuming they featured teams of the necessary high standard, have
1604:
Although the variations in career totals are most significant in the cases of Grace and Hobbs, there are differences for many other players too. Clearly the inclusion or exclusion of matches noted above affects the totals of all cricketers playing in these matches and there are other matches where
1281:
It is worth noting that until publication of the ACS lists in the 1970s, Somerset's own publications had treated the club as first-class dating from its entry into the County Championship in 1891. Since the ACS published its lists, Somerset's publications have included the matches between 1882 and
1027:
The above figures, which have been checked most carefully throughout, will be found to differ in several instances from those given in the cricket publications of the sixties and seventies; but, considering that the handbooks of that period frequently contradicted each other, and that the averages
226:
In saying that, Haygarth has recognised the essence of the problem when there is no standard means of scoring and no centralised control over the system of capturing and storing the data. Scoring systems in the 18th century and most of the 19th century had nothing like the consistency of standard
1080:
This demonstrates that even after 1896, the career figures were sufficiently uncertain that he revised the list of first-class matches. It would have been difficult for Ashley-Cooper to include and exclude matches in which Grace scored a century, but clearly the career run total was sufficiently
1386:
Given that he was near the end of his career in 1930-31, his centuries total is subject to variation from this time only, when he had already scored over 170 centuries. Therefore, the date of his 100th century is uncontested, while the date on which he passed Grace's record of centuries is only
775:
bowled a slow full toss, perhaps deliberately, which W. G. Grace dispatched to the boundary. Woods walked down the pitch and shook hands with the great man who had just completed his hundredth hundred, a century of centuries. It was an occasion for celebration: poems were written, commemorative
1513:
to the effect that, in the opinion of that body, the contest between the MCC team and The Reef at Vogelfontein on 22 and 23 December 1909, was not a first-class match. In the course of this encounter Hobbs scored 70 runs which are counted in his first-class aggregate. Seeing that the game was
1315:
totals are 50,980 runs conceded and 2809 wickets taken for an average of 18.15. Many of the differences are because of the exclusion of the 10 matches listed above, in which he took 67 wickets (including all 12 of the wickets taken in innings where the runs conceded are not known). There are,
446:
reorganised its classification of first-class matches to commence with the 1772 season. The handful of earlier scorecards, including the two in 1744, are arguably too isolated for inclusion: in this sense, the "statistical record" is divorced from the "historical record" which includes all
230:
A greater problem surfaced after 1890 with the establishment of the County Championship because, as described above, this gave rise in 1895 to the concept of first-class cricket and so, for the first time, there was a perceived higher standard based on organisation of games in an official
1165:'s team and the match-making sagacity of the Club Committee, but when the lists came out, not a few intending spectators of the contest made up their minds for a disappointment. There really did not appear on the side of the fifteen 'metal' enough to encourage the hope of a good fight 155:. Haygarth often mentions in his match summaries that another version exists of the scorecard he has reproduced. Sometimes he outlines the differences which range from players' names to runs scored and even to apparent discrepancies in innings totals or match results. 483:(with Wells and Lawrell), when The Bs were dismissed for 6 in their second innings; that match is not regarded as first-class by those statisticians who still use 1815 or 1864 as their statistical startpoint. The real significance of 1864 was the legalisation of 812:, Hobbs' opening partner, was in no hurry: Hobbs reached his 127th century with the winning runs to break Grace's record and give Surrey victory by 10 wickets. Such was the unexpected nature of Somerset's recovery that only a small crowd was there to celebrate. 1226:
Grace's scores against Somerset in 1883 are included in his first-class totals in "Green Lilly" and "Red Lilly", and similarly his scores in 1885 are included in "Red Lilly" first-class totals, "Green Lilly" having ceased publication by that time.
1131:
The match on 26 July was in fact a one-day filler that was played because the scheduled three-day North v. South match had finished a day early on 25 July: it is questionable if fillers have ever been regarded as major or first-class matches.
420:
18th century records because of "missing or incomplete scorecards". But it is by no means certain that there is a complete statistical record of matches between 1801 and 1825 either, especially given the loss of records in the catastrophic
118:
One of the problems here is that statisticians have tended not to publish their match lists with their findings: it should, however, be noted that the number of differences is extremely small in terms of the sport's overall statistics.
87:(ICC) in May 1947 as a match of three or more days' duration between two sides of eleven players officially adjudged first-class, with the governing body in each country to decide the status of teams. Significantly, it was stated that 1605:
there is disagreement regarding their first-class status. As described above, the sport's early scorecards often show differences in match details which lead to different totals. This is more common with bowling and fielding figures.
328:. This record became Grace's "traditional figures" and, as described later, was the statistical basis for the celebrations in 1925 when Jack Hobbs passed the total of 126 career centuries that Ashley-Cooper had attributed to Grace. 367:
editions, he favoured 1815 as the starting point for "proper" first-class cricket, though he conceded that there is a reasonable case for several other years, particularly Webber's 1864. Frindall thus included the entire
127:
The problem of different versions is as old as cricket scorecards themselves. The earliest known scorecards are dated 1744 but very few were created (or have survived) between 1744 and 1772 when they became habitual.
1135:
Grace's 1873 first-class aggregate was originally published in the 1874 edition of "Green Lilly" which includes the matches quoted in Grace's batting totals, but not in his bowling totals. In the 1916 obituary in
447:
significant matches, dating from 1697, for which no scorecard has survived. Contrary to Bowen's view, there is now a general accord, apart from a few matters of detail, in terms of statistical first-class status.
39:
matches played in Great Britain prior to 1895 or in the rest of the world prior to 1947. As a result, historians and statisticians have compiled differing lists of matches that they recognise as (unofficially)
1143:
The inclusion of those wickets increased Grace's 1873 season bowling total to over 100 wickets, meaning Ashley-Cooper had thereby manufactured the first-ever instance of a player performing the double. In all
487:, but there is also evidence of a more structured approach to inter-county cricket which ultimately brought about the introduction of the official County Championship. 1864 was also the first year in which 1053:
Between this 1896 article and the 1916 obituary, Ashley-Cooper omits three matches played by Grace for the South Wales Cricket Club during its tour of the London area in the latter half of July 1865:
1116:
The 1873 games typify the loose manner in which statistics were compiled in those days. Grace's first-class batting aggregate for that season included his scores in the MCC matches against
1572:
Vizzy) determined to organise his own tour which included many of India's principal players. In addition, Jack Hobbs and Herbert Sutcliffe were engaged. The matches were not reported in
1274:
has Somerset as first-class between 1882 and 1885 but not before then. Thus, Ashley-Cooper chose to retrospectively classify the 1879 and 1881 Somerset matches as first-class, while
1108:"Green Lilly") does not include the 1868 MCC v Gloucestershire match in Grace's first-class figures, but Ashley-Cooper retrospectively chose to add it to his totals for the season. 2008:
Test cricket officially began in March 1877, but the term was applied retrospectively to the early matches, and there have also been instances of retrospective recognition since.
1219:
did not regard Somerset as first-class in 1881. For the 1882 season, both "Green Lilly" and "Red Lilly" include Grace's performance against Somerset in his first-class figures and
425:
fire. Certainly, there are no complete bowling figures in that period, or until 1836, and the surviving scorecards are similar in standard and content to 18th century scorecards.
1298:
of 17.99. For some unknown reason, the modern publications using these totals have added the wickets totals together (i.e. 2876) and give a resulting average of 17.92. The 2006
1092:
includes Grace's career figures to the end of the 1895 season: this also gives the same number of centuries as the 1916 edition, but his season totals differ in some respects.
583: 320:, and W. G. Grace certainly considered his matches in 1864 to have been "first-class". Nevertheless, Grace's "first-class career" was effectively defined after his death when 2724: 2712: 1542: 395:(with a second edition in 1982), outlining its view of the first-class matches played from 1864 to 1946. This was followed by booklets covering other countries and, in 1981, 384: 1231:
differs from the annuals and excludes Somerset from its first-class averages for the seasons 1882 to 1885. The Somerset games that involved Grace from 1882 to 1885 were:
2157:
A Correct Account of all the Cricket Matches which have been played by the Mary-le-bone Club, and all other principal matches, from the Year 1786 to 1822 inclusive
1316:
however, a number of instances where the bowling figures differ from those used by Ashley-Cooper. Three of these result in changes to the number of wickets taken:
391:
among the first to raise doubts in its journal that there could ever be a generally acknowledged list of first-class matches. In 1976, the ACS produced a booklet,
214:
He goes on to list a total of 13 differences between his two versions, some re dismissal details and others re scores. He then makes a highly pertinent comment:
268:(known as "Green Lilly" on account of its cover). Two years later the two were amalgamated with the Companion "incorporating" the Guide. In 1872, their cousin 1372: 1376: 2595: 1592:
Spring Annual for 1932. In these matches, Jack Hobbs scored two centuries in Ceylon, while Herbert Sutcliffe scored one century in India and one in Ceylon.
815:
If W. G. Grace's alternative figures are applied, then Hobbs broke Grace's world record (i.e., his 125th century) on 20 July 1925, when he scored 105 for
235:
and "playing standards" was a term applied very liberally, especially with teams containing guest or occasional players in addition to recognised players.
1192: 2571: 1156:
1878 and 1879, in which Grace took part. However, in the 1872 match, not only did the MCC team have 15 batsmen, they also had 15 players in the field.
511: 1774:
Of those who have taken 2,000 first-class wickets, the following are affected (this is limited to differences in the games played or wickets taken).
1294:
obituary, his figures are 51,545 runs conceded, 2864 wickets + 12 wickets taken in innings where the runs conceded is not known, resulting in an
1161:
Before the publication of the names of the respective sides there was every prospect of a match at once worthy of the Transatlantic celebrity of
1047:
I have included MCC v Herts and MCC v Staffordshire, which, although not really first-class, have always been reckoned in WG's averages for 1873
495:
before the Lord's fire, and there are numerous matches in the 18th century which are known about in name only, with no scores having survived.
2790: 661: 2887: 1550:
with his opening partner Herbert Sutcliffe. Their career statistics are dependent on the status of matches they played in India in 1930-31.
723: 44:. The problem is significant where it touches on some of the sport's first-class records, especially in regards to the playing career of 2867: 726:(ACS) in the 1970s: the differences here are that Webber included the Gloucestershire match of 1868, but excluded two England v XIII of 568: 472: 108: 1534:
1911 clearly states that "not a ball could be bowled on the first and fourth days": thus, it was actually planned as a four-day match.
139:, which was published in several volumes. Haygarth used a number of sources for his scorecards including many that were created by the 2680: 2504: 1962: 65: 819:
at Blackheath. Hobbs still holds the world record as of 2022, and went on to make 197 or 199 career centuries (see details below).
1509:
I have also to acknowledge receipt of a letter from Mr. H.E. Holmes of Durban, enclosing the text of a pronouncement made by the
722:
published in 1968. Webber's "corrected figures" were based on a slightly different matchlist to that subsequently created by the
628: 1911: 1865: 2882: 2465: 768: 69: 2844: 2832: 2820: 828: 301: 434:
database and there classified as "major" or "minor" pending an overall accord with other sources about first-class status.
1565:
includes it. Hobbs played in 9 matches with 12 innings, 1 not out, 593 runs, 2 centuries. See below re Herbert Sutcliffe.
316:
The concept of a first-class level of cricket seems to have taken hold in the 1860s, perhaps through the influence of the
84: 1568:
An MCC tour of India was planned for 1930-31, but it was cancelled due to civil unrest. The Maharajkumar of Vizianagram (
313:
for Frederick Lillywhite from 1862 to 1871, but these were not statistical as such, rather a record of known scorecards.
2892: 1530:
have accepted the SABC ruling and do not recognise it. It is possible that the SABC thought it was a two-day match, but
1184: 438:’s "major" classification effectively stated a view that the matches concerned were first-class providing they were not 112: 784:
at Lord's on 30 May 1895 when he scored 169. Thus, according to their statistics, WG's career total was 124 centuries.
690:
version re Grace. During the 1950s, Webber made a detailed study of Grace's career and in the February 1961 edition of
1380: 1325: 1140:, Ashley-Cooper chose to add the wickets to Grace's bowling total rather than remove the runs from his batting total. 452: 199: 682:
The first statistician to make a significant challenge to these "accepted figures" was Roy Webber, who published the
506:
is clear about the first-class cricket startpoints in other countries, and these seem to be agreed by other sources:
2033:
Retrospective Test status has been granted to the West Indies v England series in 1929–30 and the 1945–46 match at
107:. There are also differences in the perceived status of certain matches played by Gloucestershire teams before the 2590: 1035: 857: 654: 203: 152: 1290:
Although not so controversial, there are also different versions of Grace's career bowling figures. In the 1916
2566: 1981: 1702: 727: 692: 207: 64:, which had begun in 1890. As a result, these 14 clubs became officially first-class from 1895 along with MCC, 491:
was published: while this is seen as the key source for cricket records, there are plenty of earlier sources.
1278:
has continued to include these matches in Grace's totals despite the editor's statement in the 1882 edition.
1300: 1162: 616: 332: 57: 17: 1081:
uncertain that matches in which he did not score a century could be added or removed without much comment.
2041:
between New Zealand and Australia. The 1929-30 West Indies tour is of particular importance, as it was at
792: 456: 276:(known as "Red Lilly"). A further period of competition ensued until another amalgamation in 1880 created 1608:
A detailed comparison of differences between various publications was produced by Philip Bailey in 1987.
380:, for which Frindall was the chief statistician, also commences its first-class records section in 1815. 1628:
matches between 1887 and 1894, but this particular match was not reported by contemporary publications.
1584:. Vizzy's team also toured Ceylon and played three three-day matches that were similarly disregarded by 1547: 1383:'s team in 1930-31. He did not score a century in the 1909–10 match but scored two in the 1930-31 tour. 248:
The earliest mainstream publication of cricket statistics was done by members of the Lillywhite family.
1148:
between 1875 and 1916, the records section has the first-ever double being performed by Grace in 1874.
2049:
scored 325: this is considered the first Test score of 300 or more, breaking the record of 287 set by
198:"The above is taken from the old printed score books; but in another account, in the first innings of 2020:. Moody's list gained approval in Australia, and was then accepted by the leading English authority, 1510: 1354:
at Clifton College 1st innings – Kershaw c E. M. Grace b W. G. Grace; not c E. M. Grace b G. F. Grace
1100:
Gloucestershire matches are generally regarded as first-class from 1870 onwards. The 1869 edition of
1067: 1062: 1057: 647: 416:
that season. In its spring 2006 journal, the ACS admitted that it could not decide upon its position
2061:
three months later; at the time, it was Bradman who was considered to have broken Foster's record.
1581: 1308:
the wicket total is given as 2026+1, indicating the 1 wicket where the runs conceded is not known.
827:
The table below summarises W. G. Grace's career figures with his original totals, as calculated by
816: 788: 707:
totals as the "accepted figures" and his own as the "corrected figures", but excluded Grace's 1873
412: 321: 171: 77: 61: 41: 1387:
affected by the differing viewpoints regarding Grace’s own centuries total (that is, 124 or 126).
776:
plates were produced, Grace’s health was widely toasted. WG went on to make 126 career centuries.
2433: 2408: 2383: 2333: 2058: 2026: 1977: 1900: 1896: 1848: 1522:
therefore decided to ignore the ruling and has continued to recognise this match as first-class.
1390:
The table below summarises Jack Hobbs' career figures with his original totals, as calculated by
1368: 1351: 1336: 1321: 1264: 1257: 1250: 1243: 1236: 1074: 1003: 999: 992: 981: 974: 967: 960: 953: 942: 935: 928: 923:
The "extra" 15 innings took place over 10 matches, listed below with his scores in each innings:
781: 764: 735: 731: 476: 253: 2308: 1179:
W. G. Grace takes guard in 1883, the year of two disputed matches for Gloucestershire v Somerset
741:
The main issues arising from the disagreement about W. G. Grace’s career totals are as follows:
1187:. Grace played a number of matches for Gloucestershire against Somerset between 1879 and 1885. 1015:
Grace's "original" totals were compiled by Ashley-Cooper and added to his obituary in the 1916
187: 167: 2786: 2676: 2500: 2042: 2013: 1128:
game at The Oval on 26 July. On the other hand, his bowling in the same matches was ignored.
1121: 1117: 696:, he presented his own revised figures by excluding matches he did not regard as first-class. 428:
In 2005, scorecards and other details of all known matches prior to 1801 were loaded into the
284:. This survived until 1883 when James announced he was "now sole proprietor". After 1885, the 104: 2492: 2358: 1190:
The 1879 and 1881 matches were not included in the first-class averages in "Green Lilly" or
1028:
given in one seldom, if ever, agreed with those tabulated in another, that is not surprising
708: 404: 373: 369: 269: 99:
published statistical records, with particular impact on the career records of W. G. Grace,
1022:
The only comment there on which matches were regarded as first-class is given on page 96:
759:
Sammy Woods bowled the delivery that gave W. G. Grace his one hundredth first-class century
442:, the other form of top-class cricket that was popular in the 18th century. In early 2010, 162:
Broadhalfpenny Down, one of the venues at which the earliest known scorecards were compiled
2755: 2611: 2599: 2575: 2517: 1295: 985: 484: 460: 411:. The ACS disagreed with Frindall about 1815 because it wanted to include the full set of 408: 306: 261: 249: 144: 132: 324:
compiled a season-by-season record to supplement Grace's obituary in the 1916 edition of
182:, and it was not inserted in the old printed book of Hambledon Scores from 1772 to 1784". 2663:
Vincent, R. B. (14 July 1930). "Test Match - Bradman 309 Not Out - All Records Broken".
72:, the main international touring teams and other teams designated as such by MCC (e.g., 2849: 2825: 1859: 1714: 1223:
remarks that "Somersetshire's debut among the first-class counties was disappointing".
1209:
As it is, the untiring energy of the executive will be rewarded by seeing Somersetshire
1125: 751:
Thirdly, when did Jack Hobbs break Grace's world record total of first-class centuries?
634: 468: 305:
which, after an uncertain start, went on to become "the cricketers' Bible". Meanwhile,
191: 140: 56:
The concept of a "first-class standard" was formalised in May 1894 at a meeting of the
1576:
and are not included in its career totals for either Hobbs or Sutcliffe. At the time,
2876: 2837: 2745: 2735: 2034: 1997: 1708: 1625: 796: 780:
and have proposed that Grace in fact completed his hundredth first-class century for
715: 622: 439: 388: 352: 166:
Haygarth first mentions the difficulty of obtaining scorecards in his summary of the
73: 2700: 2050: 2046: 2021: 1949: 1822: 1644: 1340: 1038:
to the end of the 1896 season, and these were published in a series of articles in
809: 800: 799:
to leg and completed his 126th first-class century to equal Grace's career record.
738:
and all five Gloucestershire v Somerset matches between 1882 and 1885 (see below).
595: 534: 218:"It may here be remarked, that when there are two scores of the same match, they 2054: 1672: 1344: 1305: 772: 604: 560: 464: 296: 45: 158: 2809: 2799: 2038: 1989: 1668: 1364: 1329: 805: 610: 341: 100: 2778: 1765:
Herbert Sutcliffe – 7 matches, 10 innings, 1 not out, 532 runs, 2 centuries
422: 397:
A Guide to Important Cricket Matches played in the British Isles 1709–1863
2774:(Green Lilly), Lillywhite, 1865 to 1885 (reviews of seasons 1864 to 1884) 946: 1624:
This is ranked as first-class by some sources, as are other Liverpool v
1616:
Of those who scored 35,000 first-class runs the following are affected.
755: 745:
Firstly, did Grace score 124 or 126 first-class centuries in his career?
703:, concise edition, 1963), Webber quoted both versions, referring to the 2768:(Red Lilly), Lillywhite, 1872 to 1900 (reviews of seasons 1871 to 1899) 1042:
in late 1896 and early 1897. In the first article, Ashley-Cooper says:
148: 36: 675:
were compiled by Ashley-Cooper and added to his obituary in the 1916
480: 60:(MCC) committee and the secretaries of the 14 clubs in the official 1175: 429: 35:
have come about because there is no official view of the status of
2717:
A Guide to First-class Cricket Matches Played in the British Isles
2497:
A Corner of a Foreign Field - An Indian History of a British Sport
1541: 1174: 832: 754: 393:
A Guide to First-class Cricket Matches played in the British Isles
157: 95:
been recorded since 1697 (having been in vogue since the 1660s).
748:
Secondly, when did Grace score his hundredth first-class century?
804:
Somerset recovered from a first innings deficit of 192 to leave
526:
South Africa – March 1889 (also the country's first Test match).
2144:
A Collection of all the Grand Matches of Cricket 1771 to 1791
1663:
have different scorecard data. In the Surrey second innings,
1077:
match at Oxford in May 1866 which he had previously omitted.
1371:
during the tour of South Africa in 1909–10; and the tour of
131:
The main source for scorecards from 1772 until the 1860s is
1183:
The remaining area of uncertainty relates to the status of
143:
and MCC. He frequently refers to earlier compilers such as
2053:
in 1903. Sandham's record was itself broken in England by
1741:
Wilfred Rhodes – 4 matches, 8 innings, 1 not out, 247 runs
1213:
classed with the first-class counties in the coming season
2862: 2274:
The Status of Matches in England and some other Countries
711:
to indicate that he preferred the "corrected figures".
588: 1526:
also recognises the match, but other sources including
1367:
is simpler than with Grace and relates to a match for
231:
competition. Until then, everything had been somewhat
83:
First-class cricket was formally defined by the then
2863:
Association of Cricket Statisticians and Historians
1897:
Bengal Governor's XI v Maharaja of Cooch-Behar's XI
1849:
Bengal Governor's XI v Maharaja of Cooch-Behar's XI
385:
Association of Cricket Statisticians and Historians
359:in 1968, and subsequently several editions of his 1580:rarely reported on Indian cricket except for the 1394:, and his alternative totals, that now appear on 1304:is particularly confusing in this regard, as for 1282:1885 as first-class but not those prior to 1882. 831:, and his alternative totals, that now appear on 471:were not first-class players. Among records, the 349:first-class status to a number of minor matches. 278:John and James Lillywhite's Cricketer's Companion 89:the definition does not have retrospective effect 1939:Wilfred Rhodes – 4 matches, 329 runs, 17 wickets 1914:– 5/94 (first match); 5/104, 4/34 (second match) 2675:. The History Press for The Times. p. 57. 363:: as he explained in the preface to one of the 178:"The Score of this match was obtained from the 1347:b W. G. Grace; not c E. M. Grace b G. F. Grace 655: 52:Concept and definition of first-class cricket 8: 2012:coined by the Australian cricket chronicler 1588:. They were however prominently featured in 968:XV of MCC v Gentlemen to Canada Touring Team 18:Variations in First-Class Cricket Statistics 2762:, several volumes, Lillywhite, 1862 to 1871 2729:The Cricket Statistician (various editions) 1901:MC Bird's XI v Maharaja of Cooch-Behar's XI 1085:included in their own first-class records. 795:. Jack Hobbs, 92 not out overnight, turned 2155:Bentley is known for his lengthily titled 1546:Jack Hobbs (left) walks out to bat at the 662: 648: 549: 33:Variations in published cricket statistics 1058:Middlesex Club & Ground v South Wales 2816:, Playfair Books, 1963 (concise edition) 2705:A History of Cricket, Volume 1 (to 1914) 2211: 2209: 2016:when compiling a list of matches in his 1400: 1215:. This statement clearly indicates that 1075:Oxford University v Gentlemen of England 1073:Furthermore, Ashley-Cooper includes the 839: 222:agree" (the italics are Haygarth's own). 2772:John Lillywhite's Cricketer's Companion 2635:Test Cricket and Cricketers (1877-1932) 2185: 2183: 2084: 2082: 2080: 2078: 2076: 2074: 2070: 1778:Liverpool and District v Yorkshire 1892 1620:Liverpool and District v Yorkshire 1892 1102:John Lillywhite's Cricketer's Companion 594: 575: 559: 2199: 2197: 2195: 2102: 2100: 2098: 2096: 2094: 1761:includes it. See above re Jack Hobbs. 1285: 1068:Surrey Club & Ground v South Wales 822: 2766:James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 1193:James Lillywhite's Cricketers' Annual 372:, but also a substantial part of the 7: 2804:The Playfair Book of Cricket Records 1229:Cricket: A Weekly Record of the Game 1040:Cricket: A Weekly Record of the Game 787:On the morning of 17 August 1925, a 724:Association of Cricket Statisticians 2589:, 2006 (pages 222/223) compared to 1698:does not. See above re Jack Hobbs. 475:occurred in the 1810 match between 239:Commencement of statistical records 1498:does not. Hobbs scored 39 and 31. 25: 2384:"Philadelphia v Australians 1878" 2018:Australian Cricket and Cricketers 1976:White's difference is sourced to 1337:Nottinghamshire v Gloucestershire 699:In his later record books (e.g., 540: 533:First-class cricket in the other 2740:The Kaye Book of Cricket Records 2671:Whitehead, Richard, ed. (2015). 2518:"Stump the Bearded Wonder No 27" 2481:First-Class Match List 1882–1914 2409:"South Africa v England 1888–89" 1984:in 1920. In the second innings, 1746:1930–31 tour of India and Ceylon 1538:1930–31 tour of India and Ceylon 1504:1931 (part 1, page 329) states: 684:Playfair Book of Cricket Records 567: 387:(ACS) was founded in 1973, with 357:The Kaye Book of Cricket Records 346:Playfair Book of Cricket Records 1931:figures exclude these matches. 1873:1918–19 Indian domestic season] 1733:figures exclude these matches. 1152:1873 edition of "Green Lilly". 1034:Ashley-Cooper compiled Grace's 541:W. G. Grace's career statistics 340:in statistical terms. In 1951, 2852:, Sporting Handbooks Ltd, 1948 2750:Wisden Book of Cricket Records 2652:. Wisden Cricketers' Almanack. 2565:, 2006 (page 221) compared to 1919:1922–23 Indian domestic season 1836:1917–18 Indian domestic season 1722:1922–23 Indian domestic season 1511:South African Board of Control 1286:Grace's career bowling figures 823:Grace's career batting figures 769:County Cricket Ground, Bristol 763:At 1pm on 17 May 1895, in the 714:The same approach was used by 686:in 1951. This deferred to the 361:Wisden Book of Cricket Records 292:, which continued until 1900. 260:in 1848. In 1865, his brother 123:Development of scoring to 1895 1: 2840:, John Wisden & Co., 1895 2828:, John Wisden & Co., 1890 2612:"Bill Frindall – Sports Talk" 2551:Corrections to Career Records 2462:The Classification of Matches 2434:"Europeans v Parsees 1892–93" 2309:"Tasmania v Victoria 1850–51" 2257:The Classification of Matches 1831:Wilfred Rhodes – did not bowl 1652:Surrey v Essex at Leyton 1896 523:North America – October 1878. 407:were as high as those in the 2868:The official laws of cricket 2752:, Wisden, 1998 (4th edition) 2359:"Barbados v Demerar 1864–65" 2334:"Otago v Canterbury 1863–64" 2168:Haygarth, Vol. 1, pp. 14–24. 1814:figures include this match. 1790:figures exclude this match. 1694:figures include this match. 1636:figures exclude this match. 1494:figures include this match. 1352:Gloucestershire v Lancashire 720:Kaye Book of Cricket Records 520:West Indies – February 1865. 336:began in 1947, but followed 186:Then, in his summary of the 2888:First-class cricket records 2845:Wisden Cricketers' Almanack 2833:Wisden Cricketers' Almanack 2821:Wisden Cricketers' Almanack 2814:The Book of Cricket Records 2707:. George Allen & Unwin. 2535:The Career Record Evolution 2460:, no. 58, pages 13 to 18 – 2272:, no. 3, pages 25 and 26 – 2203:Webber, 1951, Introduction. 1757:figures exclude this tour. 1561:figures exclude this tour. 1381:Maharajkumar of Vizianagram 1326:County Cricket Ground, Hove 829:Wisden Cricketers' Almanack 782:Gloucestershire v Middlesex 701:The Book of Cricket Records 517:New Zealand – January 1864. 489:Wisden Cricketers' Almanack 378:Wisden Cricketers' Almanack 302:Wisden Cricketers' Almanack 111:was formed in 1870, and by 85:Imperial Cricket Conference 2909: 1679:has Abel 8 and Hayward 4. 1265:Somerset v Gloucestershire 1258:Gloucestershire v Somerset 1251:Somerset v Gloucestershire 1244:Gloucestershire v Somerset 1237:Gloucestershire v Somerset 1171:Status of Somerset matches 1000:Gloucestershire v Somerset 993:Somerset v Gloucestershire 982:Gloucestershire v Somerset 791:match was taking place at 765:Gloucestershire v Somerset 537:nations began much later. 288:was incorporated with the 280:, still incorporating the 2549:, no. 60, pages 42 to 46 2298:Haygarth, Vol. 1, p. 522. 2255:, no. 2, pages 5 and 6 – 2215:Haygarth, Vol. 2, p. 355. 2088:ACS match guide, pp. 3–6. 1798:George Hirst – 1/40, 2/50 1239:at Spa Ground, Gloucester 1207:1882, the editor states: 995:at Lansdown CC, Bath – 80 2760:Scores & Biographies 2598:15 February 2010 at the 2574:15 February 2010 at the 2547:The Cricket Statistician 2533:, no. 59, pages 7 to 11 2531:The Cricket Statistician 2479:, no. 4, pages 22 to 27 2477:The Cricket Statistician 2458:The Cricket Statistician 2287:The Cricket Statistician 2270:The Cricket Statistician 2253:The Cricket Statistician 2189:Haygarth, Vol. 1, p. 24. 2177:Haygarth, Vol. 1, p. 14. 1982:Recreation Ground (Bath) 1322:Sussex v Gloucestershire 693:Playfair Cricket Monthly 589:Variations in statistics 137:Scores & Biographies 80:, occasional XIs, etc). 2848:, 85th edition, editor 2836:, 32nd edition, editor 2824:, 27th edition, editor 2742:, Kaye & Ward, 1968 2633:Roberts, E. L. (1932). 2587:Playfair Cricket Annual 2563:Playfair Cricket Annual 2142:Epps' standard work is 2133:ACS match guide, p. 11. 1343:2nd innings – Padley c 1301:Playfair Cricket Annual 1088:Incidentally, the 1896 1063:I Zingari v South Wales 956:at Chorley Wood – 47,26 938:at Chorley Wood – 0, 75 473:lowest known team score 333:Playfair Cricket Annual 270:James Lillywhite junior 58:Marylebone Cricket Club 2806:, Playfair Books, 1951 1803:The Reef v MCC 1909–10 1683:The Reef v MCC 1909–10 1551: 1483:The Reef v MCC 1909–10 1180: 793:County Ground, Taunton 760: 311:Scores and Biographies 256:, first published his 163: 2883:Cricket controversies 2785:. Faber & Faber. 2045:on 3 April 1930 that 2004:International cricket 1965:has 2,356 wickets in 1952:has 2,431 wickets in 1548:Sydney Cricket Ground 1545: 1328:1st innings – Hall b 1178: 929:MCC v Gloucestershire 758: 584:First-class centuries 266:Cricketer's Companion 161: 2650:Meetings during 1948 2115:Wisden 1948, p. 813. 1159:"Green Lilly" says: 808:needing 183 to win. 529:India – August 1892. 250:Frederick Lillywhite 66:Cambridge University 2893:First-class cricket 2783:W. G. Grace: A Life 2637:. Lincoln Williams. 2499:, (2001). Picador, 2024:, who quoted it in 1828:Frank Woolley – 2/8 1363:The situation with 1260:at Moreton-in-Marsh 961:MCC v Staffordshire 954:Hertfordshire v MCC 936:Hertfordshire v MCC 413:Gentlemen v Players 403:of play during the 322:F. S. Ashley-Cooper 318:Guide to Cricketers 258:Guide to Cricketers 180:Hampshire Chronicle 174:on 26 August 1773: 172:Broadhalfpenny Down 78:Gentlemen v Players 62:County Championship 27:Cricket controversy 2669:This is quoted in 1552: 1246:at Clifton College 1181: 1011:1916 Wisden totals 1004:Cheltenham College 970:at Lord's – 152, 5 931:at Lord's – 24, 13 761: 730:matches played in 274:Cricketers' Annual 254:William Lillywhite 194:on 6–8 July 1775: 188:Surrey v Hampshire 168:Hampshire v Surrey 164: 115:in 1879 and 1881. 2826:Charles F. Pardon 2792:978-0-571-17855-1 2276:by Rowland Bowen. 2259:by Rowland Bowen. 2043:Kingston, Jamaica 1978:Somerset v Surrey 1944:Other differences 1582:Bombay Tournament 1480: 1479: 1332:; not W. G. Grace 977:at The Oval – 37* 921: 920: 789:Somerset v Surrey 672: 671: 105:Herbert Sutcliffe 70:Oxford University 16:(Redirected from 2900: 2796: 2732: 2720: 2708: 2687: 2686: 2668: 2660: 2654: 2653: 2645: 2639: 2638: 2630: 2624: 2623: 2621: 2619: 2608: 2602: 2584: 2578: 2560: 2554: 2553:by Philip Bailey 2544: 2538: 2537:by Philip Bailey 2528: 2522: 2521: 2514: 2508: 2493:Ramachandra Guha 2490: 2484: 2483:by Philip Bailey 2474: 2468: 2455: 2449: 2448: 2446: 2444: 2430: 2424: 2423: 2421: 2419: 2405: 2399: 2398: 2396: 2394: 2380: 2374: 2373: 2371: 2369: 2355: 2349: 2348: 2346: 2344: 2330: 2324: 2323: 2321: 2319: 2305: 2299: 2296: 2290: 2283: 2277: 2266: 2260: 2249: 2243: 2240: 2234: 2231: 2225: 2222: 2216: 2213: 2204: 2201: 2190: 2187: 2178: 2175: 2169: 2166: 2160: 2153: 2147: 2140: 2134: 2131: 2125: 2122: 2116: 2113: 2107: 2104: 2089: 2086: 1895:figures include 1885: 1884: 1880: 1847:figures include 1600:Other cricketers 1596:in any sense.'" 1401: 1036:batting averages 840: 664: 657: 650: 571: 553:Part of a series 550: 21: 2908: 2907: 2903: 2902: 2901: 2899: 2898: 2897: 2873: 2872: 2859: 2793: 2777: 2756:Arthur Haygarth 2723: 2711: 2699: 2696: 2691: 2690: 2683: 2670: 2662: 2661: 2657: 2648:Wisden (1949). 2647: 2646: 2642: 2632: 2631: 2627: 2617: 2615: 2610: 2609: 2605: 2600:Wayback Machine 2585: 2581: 2576:Wayback Machine 2561: 2557: 2545: 2541: 2529: 2525: 2516: 2515: 2511: 2491: 2487: 2475: 2471: 2456: 2452: 2442: 2440: 2432: 2431: 2427: 2417: 2415: 2407: 2406: 2402: 2392: 2390: 2382: 2381: 2377: 2367: 2365: 2357: 2356: 2352: 2342: 2340: 2332: 2331: 2327: 2317: 2315: 2307: 2306: 2302: 2297: 2293: 2284: 2280: 2267: 2263: 2250: 2246: 2241: 2237: 2232: 2228: 2223: 2219: 2214: 2207: 2202: 2193: 2188: 2181: 2176: 2172: 2167: 2163: 2154: 2150: 2141: 2137: 2132: 2128: 2123: 2119: 2114: 2110: 2105: 2092: 2087: 2072: 2067: 2006: 1946: 1935:includes them. 1921: 1886: 1882: 1878: 1876: 1875: 1838: 1805: 1780: 1772: 1748: 1737:includes them. 1724: 1685: 1654: 1622: 1614: 1602: 1540: 1485: 1361: 1313:Cricket Archive 1288: 1200:"Red Lilly"). 1173: 1114: 1098: 1013: 986:Clifton College 825: 668: 554: 548: 543: 501: 499:Other countries 485:overarm bowling 461:William Beldham 453:Richard Newland 307:Arthur Haygarth 299:introduced his 246: 241: 145:Samuel Britcher 133:Arthur Haygarth 125: 54: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 2906: 2904: 2896: 2895: 2890: 2885: 2875: 2874: 2871: 2870: 2865: 2858: 2857:External links 2855: 2854: 2853: 2850:Hubert Preston 2841: 2829: 2817: 2807: 2797: 2791: 2775: 2769: 2763: 2753: 2743: 2733: 2721: 2709: 2695: 2692: 2689: 2688: 2682:978-0750962643 2681: 2655: 2640: 2625: 2603: 2592:CricketArchive 2579: 2568:CricketArchive 2555: 2539: 2523: 2520:. 13 May 2002. 2509: 2485: 2469: 2450: 2438:CricketArchive 2425: 2413:CricketArchive 2400: 2388:CricketArchive 2375: 2363:CricketArchive 2350: 2338:CricketArchive 2325: 2313:CricketArchive 2300: 2291: 2278: 2261: 2244: 2235: 2226: 2217: 2205: 2191: 2179: 2170: 2161: 2148: 2135: 2126: 2124:Altham, p. 23. 2117: 2108: 2090: 2069: 2068: 2066: 2063: 2014:Clarence Moody 2005: 2002: 1994:CricketArchive 1992:b White while 1974: 1973: 1971:CricketArchive 1960: 1958:CricketArchive 1945: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1933:CricketArchive 1920: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1905:CricketArchive 1874: 1871: 1870: 1869: 1863: 1860:George Dennett 1853:CricketArchive 1837: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1829: 1826: 1816:CricketArchive 1804: 1801: 1800: 1799: 1792:CricketArchive 1779: 1776: 1771: 1768: 1767: 1766: 1759:CricketArchive 1747: 1744: 1743: 1742: 1735:CricketArchive 1723: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1715:Wilfred Rhodes 1712: 1706: 1696:CricketArchive 1684: 1681: 1677:CricketArchive 1661:CricketArchive 1653: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1638:CricketArchive 1621: 1618: 1613: 1610: 1601: 1598: 1563:CricketArchive 1539: 1536: 1528:CricketArchive 1517: 1516: 1496:CricketArchive 1484: 1481: 1478: 1477: 1474: 1471: 1468: 1465: 1462: 1459: 1456: 1452: 1451: 1448: 1445: 1442: 1439: 1436: 1433: 1430: 1426: 1425: 1422: 1419: 1416: 1413: 1410: 1407: 1404: 1396:CricketArchive 1369:The Reef v MCC 1360: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1348: 1333: 1287: 1284: 1272:CricketArchive 1269: 1268: 1261: 1254: 1247: 1240: 1172: 1169: 1126:North v. South 1113: 1110: 1097: 1094: 1071: 1070: 1065: 1060: 1051: 1050: 1032: 1031: 1012: 1009: 1008: 1007: 996: 989: 978: 971: 964: 963:at Lord's – 67 957: 950: 939: 932: 919: 918: 915: 912: 909: 906: 903: 900: 897: 893: 892: 889: 886: 883: 880: 877: 874: 871: 867: 866: 863: 860: 855: 852: 849: 846: 843: 834:CricketArchive 824: 821: 753: 752: 749: 746: 670: 669: 667: 666: 659: 652: 644: 641: 640: 639: 638: 635:W. G. Grace Jr 632: 626: 620: 614: 608: 599: 598: 592: 591: 587: 586: 578: 577: 573: 572: 564: 563: 557: 556: 555:of articles on 547: 544: 542: 539: 531: 530: 527: 524: 521: 518: 515: 504:CricketArchive 500: 497: 469:William Caffyn 444:CricketArchive 436:CricketArchive 431:CricketArchive 344:published his 309:published his 264:published his 245: 242: 240: 237: 224: 223: 212: 211: 192:Laleham Burway 184: 183: 141:Hambledon Club 124: 121: 53: 50: 26: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2905: 2894: 2891: 2889: 2886: 2884: 2881: 2880: 2878: 2869: 2866: 2864: 2861: 2860: 2856: 2851: 2847: 2846: 2842: 2839: 2838:Sydney Pardon 2835: 2834: 2830: 2827: 2823: 2822: 2818: 2815: 2811: 2808: 2805: 2801: 2798: 2794: 2788: 2784: 2780: 2776: 2773: 2770: 2767: 2764: 2761: 2757: 2754: 2751: 2747: 2746:Bill Frindall 2744: 2741: 2737: 2736:Bill Frindall 2734: 2730: 2726: 2722: 2718: 2714: 2710: 2706: 2702: 2701:Altham, H. S. 2698: 2697: 2693: 2684: 2678: 2674: 2666: 2659: 2656: 2651: 2644: 2641: 2636: 2629: 2626: 2613: 2607: 2604: 2601: 2597: 2594: 2593: 2588: 2583: 2580: 2577: 2573: 2570: 2569: 2564: 2559: 2556: 2552: 2548: 2543: 2540: 2536: 2532: 2527: 2524: 2519: 2513: 2510: 2506: 2505:0-330-49117-2 2502: 2498: 2494: 2489: 2486: 2482: 2478: 2473: 2470: 2467: 2466:Philip Bailey 2463: 2459: 2454: 2451: 2439: 2435: 2429: 2426: 2414: 2410: 2404: 2401: 2389: 2385: 2379: 2376: 2364: 2360: 2354: 2351: 2339: 2335: 2329: 2326: 2314: 2310: 2304: 2301: 2295: 2292: 2288: 2282: 2279: 2275: 2271: 2265: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2248: 2245: 2239: 2236: 2230: 2227: 2221: 2218: 2212: 2210: 2206: 2200: 2198: 2196: 2192: 2186: 2184: 2180: 2174: 2171: 2165: 2162: 2158: 2152: 2149: 2145: 2139: 2136: 2130: 2127: 2121: 2118: 2112: 2109: 2103: 2101: 2099: 2097: 2095: 2091: 2085: 2083: 2081: 2079: 2077: 2075: 2071: 2064: 2062: 2060: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2040: 2036: 2035:Basin Reserve 2031: 2029: 2028: 2023: 2019: 2015: 2009: 2003: 2001: 1999: 1998:Jimmy Bridges 1995: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1972: 1969:and 2,355 in 1968: 1964: 1961: 1959: 1956:and 2,432 in 1955: 1951: 1948: 1947: 1943: 1938: 1937: 1936: 1934: 1930: 1926: 1918: 1913: 1910: 1909: 1908: 1906: 1902: 1898: 1894: 1890: 1881: 1872: 1867: 1864: 1861: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1835: 1830: 1827: 1824: 1821: 1820: 1819: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1802: 1797: 1796: 1795: 1794:includes it. 1793: 1789: 1785: 1777: 1775: 1769: 1764: 1763: 1762: 1760: 1756: 1752: 1745: 1740: 1739: 1738: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1721: 1716: 1713: 1710: 1709:Frank Woolley 1707: 1704: 1701: 1700: 1699: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1682: 1680: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1662: 1658: 1651: 1646: 1643: 1642: 1641: 1640:includes it. 1639: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1619: 1617: 1611: 1609: 1606: 1599: 1597: 1593: 1591: 1590:The Cricketer 1587: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1571: 1566: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1549: 1544: 1537: 1535: 1533: 1529: 1525: 1521: 1515: 1512: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1503: 1499: 1497: 1493: 1489: 1482: 1475: 1472: 1469: 1466: 1463: 1460: 1457: 1455:'alternative' 1454: 1453: 1449: 1446: 1443: 1440: 1437: 1434: 1431: 1428: 1427: 1423: 1420: 1417: 1414: 1411: 1408: 1405: 1403: 1402: 1399: 1397: 1393: 1388: 1384: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1366: 1358: 1353: 1349: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1331: 1327: 1323: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1314: 1309: 1307: 1303: 1302: 1297: 1293: 1283: 1279: 1277: 1273: 1266: 1262: 1259: 1255: 1252: 1248: 1245: 1241: 1238: 1234: 1233: 1232: 1230: 1224: 1222: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1201: 1199: 1195: 1194: 1188: 1186: 1177: 1170: 1168: 1166: 1164: 1163:Mr Fitzgerald 1157: 1153: 1149: 1147: 1141: 1139: 1133: 1129: 1127: 1124:, and in the 1123: 1122:Staffordshire 1119: 1118:Hertfordshire 1111: 1109: 1107: 1103: 1095: 1093: 1091: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1076: 1069: 1066: 1064: 1061: 1059: 1056: 1055: 1054: 1048: 1045: 1044: 1043: 1041: 1037: 1029: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1020: 1018: 1010: 1005: 1001: 997: 994: 990: 987: 983: 979: 976: 975:South v North 972: 969: 965: 962: 958: 955: 951: 948: 944: 943:South v North 940: 937: 933: 930: 926: 925: 924: 916: 913: 910: 907: 904: 901: 898: 896:'alternative' 895: 894: 890: 887: 884: 881: 878: 875: 872: 869: 868: 864: 861: 859: 856: 853: 850: 847: 844: 842: 841: 838: 836: 835: 830: 820: 818: 817:Surrey v Kent 813: 811: 807: 802: 798: 797:Jimmy Bridges 794: 790: 785: 783: 777: 774: 770: 766: 757: 750: 747: 744: 743: 742: 739: 737: 733: 729: 725: 721: 717: 716:Bill Frindall 712: 710: 706: 702: 697: 695: 694: 689: 685: 680: 678: 665: 660: 658: 653: 651: 646: 645: 643: 642: 636: 633: 630: 627: 624: 623:Charles Grace 621: 618: 615: 612: 609: 606: 603: 602: 601: 600: 597: 593: 590: 585: 582: 581: 580: 579: 574: 570: 566: 565: 562: 558: 552: 551: 545: 538: 536: 528: 525: 522: 519: 516: 513: 512:February 1851 509: 508: 507: 505: 498: 496: 492: 490: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 448: 445: 441: 440:single wicket 437: 433: 432: 426: 424: 419: 414: 410: 406: 400: 398: 394: 390: 389:Rowland Bowen 386: 381: 379: 375: 371: 366: 362: 358: 354: 353:Bill Frindall 350: 347: 343: 339: 335: 334: 329: 327: 323: 319: 314: 312: 308: 304: 303: 298: 293: 291: 287: 283: 279: 275: 271: 267: 263: 259: 255: 251: 243: 238: 236: 234: 228: 221: 217: 216: 215: 209: 205: 201: 197: 196: 195: 193: 189: 181: 177: 176: 175: 173: 169: 160: 156: 154: 153:Henry Bentley 150: 146: 142: 138: 134: 129: 122: 120: 116: 114: 110: 106: 102: 96: 92: 90: 86: 81: 79: 75: 74:North v South 71: 67: 63: 59: 51: 49: 47: 43: 38: 34: 30: 19: 2843: 2831: 2819: 2813: 2803: 2782: 2771: 2765: 2759: 2749: 2739: 2728: 2716: 2704: 2694:Bibliography 2673:On the Ashes 2672: 2664: 2658: 2649: 2643: 2634: 2628: 2616:. Retrieved 2606: 2591: 2586: 2582: 2567: 2562: 2558: 2550: 2546: 2542: 2534: 2530: 2526: 2512: 2496: 2488: 2480: 2476: 2472: 2461: 2457: 2453: 2441:. Retrieved 2437: 2428: 2416:. Retrieved 2412: 2403: 2391:. Retrieved 2387: 2378: 2366:. Retrieved 2362: 2353: 2341:. Retrieved 2337: 2328: 2316:. Retrieved 2312: 2303: 2294: 2286: 2281: 2273: 2269: 2264: 2256: 2252: 2247: 2238: 2229: 2220: 2173: 2164: 2156: 2151: 2143: 2138: 2129: 2120: 2111: 2106:Rae, p. 497. 2051:R. E. Foster 2047:Andy Sandham 2032: 2025: 2022:C. W. Alcock 2017: 2010: 2007: 1993: 1985: 1975: 1970: 1966: 1957: 1953: 1950:Ewart Astill 1932: 1928: 1924: 1922: 1904: 1892: 1888: 1887: 1868:– 5/22, 3/32 1852: 1844: 1840: 1839: 1823:Colin Blythe 1815: 1811: 1807: 1806: 1791: 1787: 1783: 1781: 1773: 1758: 1754: 1750: 1749: 1734: 1730: 1726: 1725: 1703:David Denton 1695: 1691: 1687: 1686: 1676: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1655: 1645:George Hirst 1637: 1633: 1629: 1623: 1615: 1607: 1603: 1594: 1589: 1585: 1577: 1573: 1569: 1567: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1553: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1518: 1508: 1501: 1500: 1495: 1491: 1487: 1486: 1395: 1391: 1389: 1385: 1362: 1341:Trent Bridge 1312: 1310: 1299: 1291: 1289: 1280: 1275: 1271: 1270: 1228: 1225: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1208: 1204: 1202: 1197: 1191: 1189: 1182: 1160: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1145: 1142: 1137: 1134: 1130: 1115: 1112:1873 matches 1105: 1101: 1099: 1089: 1087: 1083: 1079: 1072: 1052: 1046: 1039: 1033: 1026: 1021: 1016: 1014: 922: 833: 826: 814: 810:Andy Sandham 801:Percy Fender 786: 778: 762: 740: 719: 713: 704: 700: 698: 691: 687: 683: 681: 676: 673: 532: 510:Australia – 503: 502: 493: 488: 449: 443: 435: 430: 427: 417: 405:roundarm era 401: 396: 392: 382: 377: 374:underarm era 370:roundarm era 364: 360: 356: 351: 345: 337: 331: 330: 325: 317: 315: 310: 300: 294: 289: 285: 281: 277: 273: 272:started his 265: 257: 247: 232: 229: 225: 219: 213: 185: 179: 165: 136: 130: 126: 117: 97: 93: 88: 82: 55: 32: 31: 29: 2618:7 September 2614:. BBC. 2002 2242:Rae, p. 55. 2233:Rae, p. 56. 2224:Rae, p. 52. 2055:Don Bradman 1923:See above. 1912:Jack Newman 1866:Jack Newman 1782:See above. 1673:Tom Hayward 1345:E. M. Grace 1330:G. F. Grace 1306:Alfred Shaw 773:Sammy Woods 629:Henry Grace 617:Henry Grace 605:E. M. Grace 561:W. G. Grace 477:All-England 465:Alfred Mynn 409:overarm era 297:John Wisden 210:...&c". 109:county club 46:W. G. Grace 42:first-class 2877:Categories 2810:Roy Webber 2800:Roy Webber 2779:Rae, Simon 2443:16 October 2418:16 October 2393:16 October 2368:16 October 2343:16 October 2318:16 October 2289:, no. 133. 2065:References 2059:Headingley 2039:Wellington 1996:has him b 1990:Bill Hitch 1963:Jack White 1907:does not. 1855:does not. 1818:does not. 1669:Bobby Abel 1429:'original' 1365:Jack Hobbs 1359:Jack Hobbs 1267:at Taunton 1253:at Taunton 1096:1868 match 870:'original' 611:Fred Grace 457:John Small 355:published 342:Roy Webber 101:Jack Hobbs 2665:The Times 1717:– 24, 56* 1659:1897 and 1626:Yorkshire 1458:1905–1934 1432:1905–1934 899:1865–1908 873:1865–1908 767:match at 619:(brother) 613:(brother) 607:(brother) 546:Centuries 418:vis-Γ -vis 295:In 1864, 286:Companion 252:, son of 190:match at 170:match at 2781:(1998). 2715:(1982). 2703:(1962). 2596:Archived 2572:Archived 1925:Playfair 1889:Playfair 1841:Playfair 1808:Playfair 1784:Playfair 1751:Playfair 1727:Playfair 1705:– 17, 22 1688:Playfair 1675:8 while 1647:– 4, 29* 1630:Playfair 1555:Playfair 1524:Playfair 1488:Playfair 1185:Somerset 1006:– 15, 30 947:The Oval 709:"double" 113:Somerset 2027:Cricket 1770:Bowling 1711:– 3, 7* 1612:Batting 1379:by the 1296:average 1146:Wisdens 718:in his 244:England 149:W. Epps 37:cricket 2789:  2731:. ACS. 2719:. ACS. 2679:  2503:  2159:(1823) 2146:(1799) 1986:Wisden 1967:Wisden 1954:Wisden 1929:Wisden 1893:Wisden 1877:": --> 1862:– 4/69 1845:Wisden 1825:– 3/37 1812:Wisden 1788:Wisden 1755:Wisden 1731:Wisden 1692:Wisden 1671:4 and 1665:Wisden 1657:Wisden 1634:Wisden 1586:Wisden 1578:Wisden 1574:Wisden 1559:Wisden 1532:Wisden 1520:Wisden 1502:Wisden 1492:Wisden 1406:career 1392:Wisden 1377:Ceylon 1292:Wisden 1276:Wisden 1221:Wisden 1217:Wisden 1211:(sic) 1205:Wisden 1138:Wisden 1090:Wisden 1017:Wisden 908:54,211 882:54,896 845:career 806:Surrey 705:Wisden 688:Wisden 677:Wisden 596:Family 576:Career 481:The Bs 423:Lord's 365:Wisden 338:Wisden 326:Wisden 290:Annual 233:ad hoc 204:Miller 200:Surrey 2285:ACS, 2268:ACS, 2251:ACS, 1470:50.70 1467:61760 1444:50.65 1441:61237 1373:India 1350:1878 1335:1876 1320:1874 1263:1885 1256:1885 1249:1883 1242:1883 1235:1882 998:1881 991:1881 988:– 113 980:1879 973:1873 966:1873 959:1873 952:1873 941:1872 934:1872 927:1868 911:39.45 902:1,478 885:39.55 876:1,493 637:(son) 631:(son) 625:(son) 282:Guide 220:never 208:Brett 206:is b 2787:ISBN 2677:ISBN 2620:2012 2501:ISBN 2445:2011 2420:2011 2395:2011 2370:2011 2345:2011 2320:2011 1988:has 1927:and 1899:and 1891:and 1879:edit 1843:and 1810:and 1786:and 1753:and 1729:and 1690:and 1667:has 1632:and 1557:and 1490:and 1476:199 1473:316* 1461:1325 1450:197 1447:316* 1435:1315 1424:100 1418:Avge 1415:Runs 1375:and 1311:The 1120:and 917:124 891:126 865:100 858:Avge 854:Runs 736:1879 734:and 732:1878 728:Kent 535:Test 479:and 467:and 383:The 262:John 151:and 103:and 2725:ACS 2713:ACS 2464:by 2057:at 1980:at 1570:aka 1464:107 1438:106 1339:at 1324:at 1203:In 1198:aka 1106:aka 1019:. 1002:at 984:at 949:– 1 945:at 914:344 905:104 888:344 879:105 399:. 135:’s 2879:: 2812:, 2802:, 2758:, 2748:, 2738:, 2727:. 2495:, 2436:. 2411:. 2386:. 2361:. 2336:. 2311:. 2208:^ 2194:^ 2182:^ 2093:^ 2073:^ 2037:, 2030:. 2000:. 1903:. 1851:. 1421:HS 1412:NO 1398:: 1167:. 862:HS 851:NO 837:: 771:, 679:. 463:, 459:, 455:, 376:. 202:, 147:, 91:. 76:, 68:, 48:. 2795:. 2685:. 2667:. 2622:. 2507:. 2447:. 2422:. 2397:. 2372:. 2347:. 2322:. 1883:] 1409:I 1196:( 1104:( 1049:. 1030:. 848:I 663:e 656:t 649:v 514:. 20:)

Index

Variations in First-Class Cricket Statistics
cricket
first-class
W. G. Grace
Marylebone Cricket Club
County Championship
Cambridge University
Oxford University
North v South
Gentlemen v Players
Imperial Cricket Conference
Jack Hobbs
Herbert Sutcliffe
county club
Somerset
Arthur Haygarth
Hambledon Club
Samuel Britcher
W. Epps
Henry Bentley

Hampshire v Surrey
Broadhalfpenny Down
Surrey v Hampshire
Laleham Burway
Surrey
Miller
Brett
Frederick Lillywhite
William Lillywhite

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑