316:) instead of a pop-up has reduced user confusion, at the cost of making it harder, if not impossible, for the user to verify that the page is genuine in the first place. As of 2022, web browsers do not provide a way to check the security certificate for the contents of an iframe. Some of these concerns about site validity for Verified by Visa are mitigated, however, as its current implementation of the enrollment process requires entering a personal message which is displayed in later Verified by Visa pop-ups to provide some assurance to the user the pop-ups are genuine.
237:(MPI) to connect to the Visa or Mastercard directory server. This is expensive (setup fee, monthly fee, and per-transaction fee); at the same time, it represents additional revenue for MPI providers. Supporting 3-D Secure is complicated and, at times, creates transaction failures. Perhaps the biggest disadvantage for merchants is that many users view the additional authentication step as a nuisance or obstacle, which results in a substantial increase in transaction abandonment and lost revenue.
195:
387:
transactions, although the resulting authentication cannot be directly related to a specific transaction between merchant and cardholder. A patented system called iSignthis splits the agreed transaction amount into two (or more) random amounts, with the cardholder then proving that they are the owner of the account by confirming the amounts on their statement.
417:
risk of the transaction. The customer would only be required to pass an authentication challenge if their transaction is determined to be of a high risk. In addition, the workflow for authentication is designed so that it no longer requires redirects to a separate page, and can also activate out-of-band authentication via an institution's
320:
their identity by answering security questions which should be known to their card issuer. Again, this is done within an iframe where they cannot easily verify the site they are providing this information to—a cracked site or illegitimate merchant could in this way gather all the details they need to pose as the customer.
294:
or frame is really from their card issuer when it could be from a fraudulent website attempting to harvest the cardholder's details. Such pop-up windows or script-based frames lack any access to any security certificate, eliminating any way to confirm the credentials of the implementation of 3-D Secure.
416:
In
October 2016, EMVCo published the specification for 3-D Secure 2.0; it is designed to be less intrusive than the first version of the specification, allowing more contextual data to be sent to the customer's card issuer (including mailing addresses and transaction history) to verify and assess the
293:
The system involves a pop-up window or inline frame appearing during the online transaction process, requiring the cardholder to enter a password which, if the transaction is legitimate, their card issuer will be able to authenticate. The problem for the cardholder is determining if the pop-up window
207:
In the 3-D Secure protocol, the ACS (access control server) is on the card issuer side. Currently, most card issuers outsource ACS to a third party. Commonly, the buyer's web browser shows the domain name of the ACS provider, rather than the card issuer's domain name; however, this is not required by
336:
Mobile browsers present particular problems for 3-D Secure due to the common lack of certain features such as frames and pop-ups. Even if the merchant has a mobile website, unless the issuer is also mobile-aware, the authentication pages may fail to render properly, or even at all. In the end, many
245:
In most current implementations of 3-D Secure, the card issuer or its ACS provider prompts the buyer for a password that is known only to the card issuer or ACS provider and the buyer. Since the merchant does not know this password and is not responsible for capturing it, it can be used by the card
174:
A transaction using
Verified by Visa or SecureCode will initiate a redirection to the website of the card issuer to authorize the transaction. Each issuer could use any kind of authentication method (the protocol does not cover this) but typically, a password tied to the card is entered when making
332:
if the cardholder cannot verify the SSL server certificate for the password page. Some commerce sites will devote the full browser page to the authentication rather than using a frame (not necessarily an iframe), which is a less secure object. In this case, the lock icon in the browser should show
327:
Cardholders who are unwilling to take the risk of registering their card during a purchase, with the commerce site controlling the browser to some extent, can in some cases go to their card issuer's website in a separate browser window and register from there. When they return to the commerce site
319:
Some card issuers also use activation-during-shopping (ADS), in which cardholders who are not registered with the scheme are offered the opportunity of signing up (or forced into signing up) during the purchase process. This will typically take them to a form in which they are expected to confirm
382:
3-D Secure relies upon the issuer actively being involved and ensuring that any card issued becomes enrolled by the cardholder; as such, acquirers must either accept unenrolled cards without performing strong customer authentication or reject such transactions, including those from smaller card
340:
In some cases, 3-D Secure ends up providing little security to the cardholder, and can act as a device to pass liability for fraudulent transactions from the card issuer or retailer to the cardholder. Legal conditions applied to the 3-D Secure service are sometimes worded in a way that makes it
407:
Some countries like India made use of not only CVV2, but 3-D Secure mandatory, a SMS code sent from a card issuer and typed in the browser when you are redirected when you click "purchase" to the payment system or card issuer system site where you type that code and only then the operation is
279:
One significant disadvantage is that cardholders are likely to see their browser connect to unfamiliar domain names as a result of vendors' MPI implementations and the use of outsourced ACS implementations by card issuers, which might make it easier to perform phishing attacks on cardholders.
386:
Alternative approaches perform authentication on the acquiring side, without requiring prior enrollment with the issuer. For instance, PayPal's patented 'verification' uses one or more dummy transactions are directed towards a credit card, and the cardholder must confirm the value of these
1021:
3-D secure password has been made mandatory by the
Reserve Bank of India to ensure safer online shopping. This will prevent misuse of a lost/stolen card as the user will be unable to proceed unless they enter the password associated with your card, created by yourself and known only to
323:
Implementation of 3-D Secure sign-up will often not allow a user to proceed with a purchase until they have agreed to sign up to 3-D Secure and its terms and conditions, not offering any alternative way of navigating away from the page than closing it, thus abandoning the transaction.
349:
Card issuers and merchants may use 3-D Secure systems unevenly with regard to card issuers that issue cards in several geographic locations, creating differentiation, for example, between the domestic US- and non-US-issued cards. For example, since Visa and
Mastercard treat the
328:
and start over they should see that their card is registered. The presence on the password page of the personal assurance message (PAM) that they chose when registering is their confirmation that the page is coming from the card issuer. This still leaves some possibility of a
190:
The main difference between Visa and
Mastercard implementations lies in the method to generate the UCAF (Universal Cardholder Authentication Field): Mastercard uses AAV (Accountholder Authentication Value) and Visa uses CAVV (Cardholder Authentication Verification Value).
297:
The
Verified by Visa system has drawn some criticism, since it is hard for users to differentiate between the legitimate Verified by Visa pop-up window or inline frame, and a fraudulent phishing site. This is because the pop-up window is served from a domain which is:
162:
Interoperability Domain (the infrastructure provided by the card scheme, credit, debit, prepaid or other types of a payment card, to support the 3-D Secure protocol). It includes the
Internet, merchant plug-in, access control server, and other software
250:
Copying card details, either by writing down the numbers on the card itself or by way of modified terminals or ATMs, does not result in the ability to purchase over the
Internet because of the additional password, which is not stored on or written on the
962:
254:
Since the merchant does not capture the password, there is a reduced risk from security incidents at online merchants; while an incident may still result in hackers obtaining other card details, there is no way for them to get the associated
151:
The basic concept of the protocol is to tie the financial authorization process with online authentication. This additional security authentication is based on a three-domain model (hence the "3-D" in the name). The three domains are:
333:
the identity of either the card issuer or the operator of the verification site. The cardholder can confirm that this is in the same domain that they visited when registering their card if it is not the domain of their card issuer.
216:
Each 3-D Secure version 1 transaction involves two
Internet request/response pairs: VEReq/VERes and PAReq/PARes. Visa and Mastercard do not permit merchants to send requests directly to their servers. Merchants must instead use MPI
920:
358:
as a non-US international, rather than a domestic US location, cardholders there may confront a greater incidence of 3-D Secure queries than cardholders in the fifty states. Complaints to that effect have been received by
271:
and the like. These types of devices might provide a better user experience for customers as they free the purchaser from having to use a secure password. Some issuers are now using such devices as part of the
966:
312:
In some cases, the
Verified by Visa system has been mistaken by users for a phishing scam and has itself become the target of some phishing scams. The newer recommendation to use an inline frame (
941:
136:. Version 2 of the protocol was published in 2016 with the aim of complying with new EU authentication requirements and resolving some of the short-comings of the original protocol.
64:
337:
analysts have concluded that the activation-during-shopping (ADS) protocols invite more risk than they remove and furthermore transfer this increased risk to the consumer.
48:
transactions. The name refers to the "three domains" which interact using the protocol: the merchant/acquirer domain, the issuer domain, and the interoperability domain.
1143:
396:
351:
139:
Analysis of the first version of the protocol by academia has shown it to have many security issues that affect the consumer, including a greater surface area for
51:
Originally developed in the autumn of 1999 by Celo Communications AB (which was acquired by Gemplus Associates and integrated into Gemplus, Gemalto and now
360:
498:
649:
1009:
69:
632:
796:
741:
607:
171:
connections with client authentication (this ensures the authenticity of both peers, the server and the client, using digital certificates).
1123:
775:
523:
1103:
661:
This 2010 study documented increases in the number of abandoned transactions of 10% to 12% for merchants newly joining the program.
1138:
1034:
1108:
179:
session. In this way, the card issuer's systems can be held responsible for most security breaches. Today it is easy to send a
426:
372:
1092:
551:
208:
the protocol. Dependent on the ACS provider, it is possible to specify a card issuer-owned domain name for use by the ACS.
438:
825:
871:
273:
246:
issuer as evidence that the purchaser is indeed their cardholder. This is intended to help decrease risk in two ways:
1113:
376:
719:
329:
187:
to users' mobile phones and emails for authentication, at least during enrollment and for forgotten passwords.
168:
695:
175:
online purchases. The Verified by Visa protocol recommends the card issuer's verification page to load in an
846:
502:
594:. Financial Cryptography and Data Security FC2010. Vol. 6052. Tenerife: Springer. pp. 336–342.
408:
accepted. Nevertheless, Amazon can still do transactions from other countries with turned-on 3-D Secure.
379:; earlier variants used static passwords, which are not sufficient to meet the directive's requirements.
84:. with the intention of improving the security of Internet payments, and offered to customers under the
1001:
484:
800:
963:"EPCA Payment Summit: iSignthis presents its authentication service as an alternative to 3D Secure"
745:
113:
1098:
895:
767:
31:
603:
586:
180:
527:
1063:
595:
582:
444:
371:
Version 2 of 3-D Secure, which incorporates one-time passcodes, is a form of software-based
263:
the use of password authentication. It is said to be possible to use it in conjunction with
234:
218:
121:
987:
77:
988:"ACCC Releases Draft Determination Against Mandated Use Of 3D Secure For Online Payments"
1118:
268:
184:
1132:
105:
470:
1086:
313:
176:
52:
599:
588:
Verified by Visa and MasterCard SecureCode: or, How Not to Design Authentication
355:
264:
41:
17:
341:
difficult for the cardholder to escape liability from fraudulent transactions.
1059:
422:
418:
230:
93:
60:
45:
671:
399:(ACCC) after numerous objections and flaw-related submissions were received.
156:
Acquirer domain (the bank and the merchant to which the money is being paid),
821:
194:
56:
229:
The advantage for merchants is the reduction of "unauthorized transaction"
140:
81:
395:
A proposal to make 3-D Secure mandatory in Australia was blocked by the
921:"US2001021725 System and Method for Verifying a Financial Instrument"
73:). A new updated version was developed by Gemplus between 2000-2001.
40:
is a protocol designed to be an additional security layer for online
650:"Are Verified by Visa and MasterCard SecureCode Conversion Killers?"
193:
768:"Verified by Visa scheme confuses thousands of internet shoppers"
233:. One disadvantage for merchants is that they have to purchase a
450:
129:
1035:"Adyen Touts Its 3-D Secure 2.0 Service As "First" to Market"
942:"AU2011000377 Methods and Systems for Verifying Transactions"
143:
and a shift of liability in the case of fraudulent payments.
92:). Services based on the protocol have also been adopted by
627:
625:
552:"Merchants can't let 'PSD2' and 'SCA' be vague initials"
128:. Later revisions of the protocol have been produced by
383:
schemes which do not have 3-D Secure implementations.
899:
1060:"Stripe: 3D Secure 2 - Guide to 3DS2 Authentication"
822:"Verified By Visa Activation – Visa Phishing Scams"
720:"Antiworm: Verified by Visa (Veriphied Phishing?)"
546:
544:
397:Australian Competition & Consumer Commission
363:"equal treatment" economic discrimination site.
696:"What is 3D Secure? Advantages for E-commerce"
742:"Industry lays into 3-D Secure - 11 Apr 2008"
8:
377:Revised Directive on Payment Services (PSD2)
367:3-D Secure as strong customer authentication
276:or Dynamic Passcode Authentication schemes.
1002:"Amazon.in Help: About CVV and 3-D Secure"
361:Puerto Rico Department of Consumer Affairs
167:The protocol uses XML messages sent over
576:
574:
572:
425:). 3-D Secure 2.0 is compliant with EU "
797:"Is securesuite.co.uk a phishing scam?"
633:"Verified by Visa Implementation Guide"
485:"Visa USA tightens security with Arcot"
462:
421:(which, in turn, can also be used with
302:Not the site where the user is shopping
63:as the project was a big challenge and
1144:Financial industry XML-based standards
652:. practicalecommerce.com. 14 June 2013
585:(25–28 January 2010). Sion, R. (ed.).
526:. AmericanExpress.com. Archived from
7:
70:The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy
722:. Antiworm.blogspot.com. 2006-02-02
672:"Card authentication and 3D Secure"
59:in a project named "p42" ("p" from
1124:Discover Global Network ProtectBuy
923:. Patentscope.wipo.int. 2002-01-17
824:. MillerSmiles.co.uk. 2006-08-22.
25:
1109:Verified by Visa Partner Network
828:from the original on 8 July 2010
159:Issuer domain (the card issuer),
1114:Mastercard SecureCode home page
1012:from the original on 2021-06-24
778:from the original on 6 May 2010
391:ACCC blocks 3-D Secure proposal
766:Brignall, Miles (2007-04-21).
501:. discover.com. Archived from
427:strong customer authentication
373:strong customer authentication
308:Not visa.com or mastercard.com
289:Verifiability of site identity
241:Buyers and credit card holders
1:
965:. The Paypers. Archived from
898:. daco.pr.gov. Archived from
799:. Ambrand.com. Archived from
439:Secure electronic transaction
259:3-D Secure does not strictly
147:Description and basic aspects
872:"Activation During Shopping"
600:10.1007/978-3-642-14577-3_27
1104:Activating Verified by Visa
352:unincorporated US territory
274:Chip Authentication Program
76:In 2001 Arcot Systems (now
1160:
88:brand (later rebranded as
29:
744:. IT Week. Archived from
345:Geographic discrimination
27:Computer network protocol
1093:American Express SafeKey
1087:American Express SafeKey
423:biometric authentication
330:man-in-the-middle attack
126:American Express SafeKey
30:Not to be confused with
1139:Cryptographic protocols
847:"Verified by Visa FAQs"
375:as defined by the EU's
944:. Patentscope.wipo.int
199:
1095:(global partner site)
197:
1039:Digital Transactions
581:Murdoch, Steven J.;
100:(later rebranded as
1058:Godement, Olivier.
305:Not the card issuer
265:smart card readers
200:
65:"42" as the answer
32:card security code
740:Muncaster, Phil.
609:978-3-642-14992-4
284:General criticism
181:one-time password
114:JCB International
16:(Redirected from
1151:
1099:Verified by Visa
1074:
1073:
1071:
1070:
1055:
1049:
1048:
1046:
1045:
1031:
1025:
1024:
1018:
1017:
998:
992:
991:
984:
978:
977:
975:
974:
959:
953:
952:
950:
949:
938:
932:
931:
929:
928:
917:
911:
910:
908:
907:
892:
886:
885:
883:
882:
876:
868:
862:
861:
859:
857:
843:
837:
836:
834:
833:
818:
812:
811:
809:
808:
793:
787:
786:
784:
783:
763:
757:
756:
754:
753:
737:
731:
730:
728:
727:
716:
710:
709:
707:
706:
692:
686:
685:
683:
682:
668:
662:
660:
658:
657:
646:
640:
639:
637:
629:
620:
619:
617:
616:
593:
578:
567:
566:
564:
563:
548:
539:
538:
536:
535:
520:
514:
513:
511:
510:
495:
489:
488:
481:
475:
474:
467:
445:Merchant plug-in
235:merchant plug-in
219:merchant plug-in
185:SMS text message
122:American Express
86:Verified by Visa
21:
18:Verified by Visa
1159:
1158:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1129:
1128:
1089:(consumer site)
1083:
1078:
1077:
1068:
1066:
1057:
1056:
1052:
1043:
1041:
1033:
1032:
1028:
1015:
1013:
1000:
999:
995:
986:
985:
981:
972:
970:
961:
960:
956:
947:
945:
940:
939:
935:
926:
924:
919:
918:
914:
905:
903:
894:
893:
889:
880:
878:
874:
870:
869:
865:
855:
853:
845:
844:
840:
831:
829:
820:
819:
815:
806:
804:
795:
794:
790:
781:
779:
765:
764:
760:
751:
749:
739:
738:
734:
725:
723:
718:
717:
713:
704:
702:
694:
693:
689:
680:
678:
670:
669:
665:
655:
653:
648:
647:
643:
635:
631:
630:
623:
614:
612:
610:
591:
580:
579:
570:
561:
559:
550:
549:
542:
533:
531:
522:
521:
517:
508:
506:
497:
496:
492:
483:
482:
478:
469:
468:
464:
459:
435:
414:
405:
393:
369:
347:
291:
286:
269:security tokens
243:
227:
214:
205:
198:3-D Secure Flow
149:
132:under the name
78:CA Technologies
35:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
1157:
1155:
1147:
1146:
1141:
1131:
1130:
1127:
1126:
1121:
1116:
1111:
1106:
1101:
1096:
1090:
1082:
1081:External links
1079:
1076:
1075:
1050:
1026:
993:
979:
954:
933:
912:
887:
863:
851:www.visa.co.uk
838:
813:
788:
758:
732:
711:
687:
663:
641:
621:
608:
583:Anderson, Ross
568:
558:. 12 June 2019
556:PaymentsSource
540:
515:
490:
476:
461:
460:
458:
455:
454:
453:
448:
442:
434:
431:
413:
412:3-D Secure 2.0
410:
404:
401:
392:
389:
368:
365:
346:
343:
310:
309:
306:
303:
290:
287:
285:
282:
257:
256:
252:
242:
239:
226:
223:
213:
210:
204:
201:
183:as part of an
165:
164:
160:
157:
148:
145:
134:EMV 3-D Secure
102:Identity Check
67:from the book
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1156:
1145:
1142:
1140:
1137:
1136:
1134:
1125:
1122:
1120:
1117:
1115:
1112:
1110:
1107:
1105:
1102:
1100:
1097:
1094:
1091:
1088:
1085:
1084:
1080:
1065:
1061:
1054:
1051:
1040:
1036:
1030:
1027:
1023:
1011:
1007:
1006:www.amazon.in
1003:
997:
994:
989:
983:
980:
969:on 2013-11-01
968:
964:
958:
955:
943:
937:
934:
922:
916:
913:
902:on 2014-08-12
901:
897:
896:"daco.pr.gov"
891:
888:
877:. Visa Europe
873:
867:
864:
852:
848:
842:
839:
827:
823:
817:
814:
803:on 2010-06-16
802:
798:
792:
789:
777:
773:
769:
762:
759:
748:on 2008-10-07
747:
743:
736:
733:
721:
715:
712:
701:
697:
691:
688:
677:
673:
667:
664:
651:
645:
642:
634:
628:
626:
622:
611:
605:
601:
597:
590:
589:
584:
577:
575:
573:
569:
557:
553:
547:
545:
541:
530:on 2011-08-07
529:
525:
519:
516:
505:on 2019-08-22
504:
500:
494:
491:
486:
480:
477:
472:
466:
463:
456:
452:
449:
446:
443:
440:
437:
436:
432:
430:
428:
424:
420:
411:
409:
402:
400:
398:
390:
388:
384:
380:
378:
374:
366:
364:
362:
357:
353:
344:
342:
338:
334:
331:
325:
321:
317:
315:
307:
304:
301:
300:
299:
295:
288:
283:
281:
277:
275:
270:
266:
262:
253:
249:
248:
247:
240:
238:
236:
232:
224:
222:
221:) providers.
220:
212:MPI providers
211:
209:
203:ACS providers
202:
196:
192:
188:
186:
182:
178:
172:
170:
161:
158:
155:
154:
153:
146:
144:
142:
137:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
111:
107:
103:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
74:
72:
71:
66:
62:
58:
54:
49:
47:
43:
39:
33:
19:
1119:usa.visa.com
1067:. Retrieved
1053:
1042:. Retrieved
1038:
1029:
1020:
1014:. Retrieved
1005:
996:
982:
971:. Retrieved
967:the original
957:
946:. Retrieved
936:
925:. Retrieved
915:
904:. Retrieved
900:the original
890:
879:. Retrieved
866:
854:. Retrieved
850:
841:
830:. Retrieved
816:
805:. Retrieved
801:the original
791:
780:. Retrieved
772:The Guardian
771:
761:
750:. Retrieved
746:the original
735:
724:. Retrieved
714:
703:. Retrieved
699:
690:
679:. Retrieved
675:
666:
654:. Retrieved
644:
613:. Retrieved
587:
560:. Retrieved
555:
532:. Retrieved
528:the original
518:
507:. Retrieved
503:the original
499:"ProtectBuy"
493:
479:
471:"3-D Secure"
465:
429:" mandates.
415:
406:
394:
385:
381:
370:
348:
339:
335:
326:
322:
318:
311:
296:
292:
278:
260:
258:
244:
228:
215:
206:
189:
177:inline frame
173:
166:
150:
138:
133:
125:
117:
109:
101:
97:
89:
85:
75:
68:
53:Thales Group
50:
37:
36:
356:Puerto Rico
231:chargebacks
90:Visa Secure
1133:Categories
1069:2019-07-11
1044:2019-07-11
1016:2020-06-17
973:2014-07-17
948:2014-07-17
927:2014-07-17
906:2014-07-17
881:2010-08-11
832:2010-08-11
807:2010-08-11
782:2010-04-23
774:. London.
752:2010-08-11
726:2010-08-11
705:2021-08-25
681:2021-08-25
676:stripe.com
656:2013-07-30
615:2012-04-23
562:2019-07-11
534:2010-08-11
509:2019-08-22
457:References
419:mobile app
163:providers.
110:ProtectBuy
98:SecureCode
94:Mastercard
61:Pole vault
46:debit card
38:3-D Secure
856:6 October
524:"SafeKey"
255:password.
225:Merchants
120:, and by
57:Visa Inc.
1010:Archived
826:Archived
776:Archived
487:. ZDnet.
433:See also
141:phishing
118:J/Secure
106:Discover
82:Visa Inc
261:require
1064:Stripe
606:
314:iframe
104:), by
80:) and
55:) for
42:credit
875:(PDF)
700:MONEI
636:(PDF)
592:(PDF)
447:(MPI)
441:(SET)
403:India
251:card.
130:EMVCo
112:, by
1022:you.
858:2016
604:ISBN
44:and
596:doi
451:EMV
354:of
169:SSL
124:as
116:as
108:as
96:as
1135::
1062:.
1037:.
1019:.
1008:.
1004:.
849:.
770:.
698:.
674:.
624:^
602:.
571:^
554:.
543:^
267:,
1072:.
1047:.
990:.
976:.
951:.
930:.
909:.
884:.
860:.
835:.
810:.
785:.
755:.
729:.
708:.
684:.
659:.
638:.
618:.
598::
565:.
537:.
512:.
473:.
217:(
34:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
