213:" as the Americans call it when the Senate and the House of Representatives disagree - will worry that the Wakeham proposals set us on just that course. On the other hand, those who believe that the second chamber must have the full democratic mandate which only the ballot box can bestow will be disappointed."
192:
Another important criticism of the report's recommendations is that adding some elected members to the House might create two 'classes' of members; the elected members might be seen as having greater democratic legitimacy and authority than the appointed members. This could also threaten the
129:
There would be "no significant changes in the second chamber's law-making functions" or the balance of power between the
Commons and Lords. The reformed House of Lords would retain a "suspensory veto" (the power to delay, but not to block, a bill approved by the Commons in two successive
101:
With respect to representation of religious groups, a substantial majority of the
Commission believed that "Representation should be extended beyond the Church of England to embrace other Christian denominations in all parts of the United Kingdom and representatives of other
166:
227:
Some critics argued that the report would result in the Lords becoming in effect a weak advisory council for the House of
Commons, which would lead to excessive conflict between the few elected members and the mainly appointed members.
60:, issued in January 2000, the commission made 132 recommendations that it described as a blueprint for "radical evolutionary change" of the House of Lords for better government. Of these, major recommendations included the following:
188:
The report was criticised that it proposed that the Lords' ability to veto subordinated and delegated legislation should be replaced by a three-month delaying power to make clear that the Lords is the Second
Chamber.
98:. Three different models were proposed, with varying numbers of elected members; under all three models, members were to serve for terms of "three electoral cycles" or 15 years.
220:
political correspondent Nick
Assinder, "opponents accused the commission of failing to come up with a single, simple recommendation and allowing the creation of chamber of "
404:
209:, wrote in January 2000: "Those who fear that a House of Lords with increased authority will challenge the status of the Commons and cause constitutional conflict - or "
367:
84:
245:
138:
162:
76:
389:
177:
The report has been criticised for not addressing some crucial issues. For instance, at present, the House of Lords only has a power of
83:. The Honours and Appointments Commission would consist of eight members (three from the major political parties, one nominated by
158:
314:
194:
185:
may pass it without the Lords' assent. The report did not address whether this situation would change, or remain the same.
45:
394:
95:
68:
41:
91:
and with a term limit of 10 years. The commission's appointees would maintain crossbench representation at about 20%.
145:
The
Commission explicitly recommended against a wholly or predominantly elected chamber or selection of members by
326:
371:
182:
409:
399:
202:
216:
Others were dissatisfied with the
Wakeham Commission's refusal to remove appointed members; according to
131:
277:
210:
120:
80:
198:
75:) should be appointed by an independent Honours and Appointments Commission, rather than by the
221:
154:
88:
37:
178:
109:
94:
A minority of members (between 60 and 195) should be elected on a regional basis, through
72:
137:
There was "insufficient reason to change the present arrangements" with respect to the
105:
Ministers should be accountable to the House of Lords as well as the House of
Commons.
383:
354:
342:
206:
17:
141:, and there was "some advantage in having senior judges" be members of the House.
327:
Review of "Reforming the House of Lords: Lessons from
Overseas" by Meg Russell
150:
146:
236:
Only a few of the
Wakeham Report's 132 recommendations were ever adopted.
116:
67:
A majority of the House (every member except for the regional members,
64:
The membership of the House of Lords should be reduced to around 550.
181:; they may only delay legislation for one year, after which the
368:
Royal commissions are outdated and will not deliver real change
126:
Members of the reformed House would not longer be called peers.
217:
79:; this would reduce the role of the House as a source of
278:Reformed chamber presented as 'radical evolution'
87:, and four independents), appointed under the
8:
246:The Wakeham Report - A House for the Future
201:parliamentary system. One commentator, the
167:British members of the European Parliament
36:, published in 2000, was the report of a
405:Reports of the United Kingdom government
139:judicial functions of the House of Lords
315:Executive Summary of the Wakeham Report
310:
256:
308:
306:
304:
302:
300:
298:
296:
294:
292:
290:
272:
270:
268:
266:
264:
262:
260:
7:
123:would not be members of the House.
25:
73:Church of England representatives
195:primacy of the House of Commons
1:
355:Lords report fails to satisfy
333:, vol.71, issue 3, pp 362–380
130:parliamentary sessions). The
52:Recommendations of the report
46:reform of the House of Lords
357:, BBC News, 20 January 2000
345:, BBC News, 20 January 2000
96:proportional representation
426:
390:2000 in the United Kingdom
343:Wakeham is not the answer
372:Institute for Government
173:Criticisms of the report
56:In its 217-page report,
331:The Political Quarterly
115:Persons raised to the
58:A House for the Future
29:A House for the Future
159:devolved institutions
134:would be maintained.
132:Salisbury Convention
374:(22 November 2019).
81:political patronage
395:Westminster system
366:Marcus Shepheard,
325:Mitchell, Jeremy,
284:, 21 January 2000.
112:should be removed.
108:The few remaining
18:Wakeham Commission
163:local governments
155:indirect election
16:(Redirected from
417:
375:
364:
358:
352:
346:
340:
334:
323:
317:
312:
285:
274:
203:Liberal Democrat
183:House of Commons
147:random selection
110:hereditary peers
89:Nolan principles
38:Royal Commission
21:
425:
424:
420:
419:
418:
416:
415:
414:
380:
379:
378:
365:
361:
353:
349:
341:
337:
324:
320:
313:
288:
275:
258:
254:
242:
234:
179:suspensive veto
175:
69:lords of appeal
54:
32:, known as the
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
423:
421:
413:
412:
410:2000 documents
407:
402:
400:House of Lords
397:
392:
382:
381:
377:
376:
359:
347:
335:
318:
286:
255:
253:
250:
249:
248:
241:
240:External links
238:
233:
230:
222:Tony's Cronies
174:
171:
143:
142:
135:
127:
124:
113:
106:
103:
99:
92:
77:Prime Minister
65:
53:
50:
34:Wakeham Report
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
422:
411:
408:
406:
403:
401:
398:
396:
393:
391:
388:
387:
385:
373:
369:
363:
360:
356:
351:
348:
344:
339:
336:
332:
328:
322:
319:
316:
311:
309:
307:
305:
303:
301:
299:
297:
295:
293:
291:
287:
283:
279:
273:
271:
269:
267:
265:
263:
261:
257:
251:
247:
244:
243:
239:
237:
231:
229:
225:
223:
219:
214:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
190:
186:
184:
180:
172:
170:
168:
164:
160:
156:
152:
148:
140:
136:
133:
128:
125:
122:
121:honours lists
118:
114:
111:
107:
104:
100:
97:
93:
90:
86:
85:crossbenchers
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
63:
62:
61:
59:
51:
49:
47:
44:, concerning
43:
39:
35:
31:
30:
19:
362:
350:
338:
330:
321:
282:The Guardian
281:
235:
226:
215:
207:Lord McNally
193:traditional
191:
187:
176:
144:
119:through the
57:
55:
42:Lord Wakeham
33:
28:
27:
26:
276:Lucy Ward,
199:Westminster
197:within the
384:Categories
252:References
40:headed by
151:co-option
211:gridlock
169:(MEPs).
102:faiths."
117:peerage
232:Impact
71:, and
205:peer
165:, or
157:from
153:, or
224:"".
218:BBC
386::
370:,
329:,
289:^
280:,
259:^
161:,
149:,
48:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.