39:
173:, with his wife. The farm itself belonged to Kingdown Farm Limited, a company 15 percent owned by Wheeler and 85 percent owned by J.J. Saunders Ltd. The two fell out by March 1988, with Wheeler dismissed from his position as managing director of Kingdown Farm Limited. Between July 1988 and April 1990, J.J. Saunders constructed a pair of pig houses near Kingdown Farm House, which featured a channel to contain the pigs' excrement. Wheeler brought a case on two grounds, the first querying whether he was entitled to an
153:. Wheeler was a veterinary surgeon who owned Kingdown Farm House; the wider farm was owned by J.J. Saunders Ltd, who used it for raising pigs. After Saunders gained planning permission for a pair of pig houses, Wheeler brought an action in nuisance, alleging that the smell of the pigs interfered with his use and enjoyment of the land. When the case went to the Court of Appeal, Saunders argued that the granting of planning permission for the pig houses had changed the nature of the area, as in
229:, where it was held that the granting of planning permission had changed the area in such a way that what would previously have been a nuisance was not. The defendants argued that the granting of planning permission for their pig houses authorised the nuisance in line with
193:, before being transferred to Bristol District Registry, where Judge Weeks gave his judgment on 24 July 1992, dismissing 6 of the 10 claims made by Wheeler but awarding £2,820 of damages and issuing 3 injunctions. The case was appealed to the
233:. This argument was rejected by the Court of Appeal, which held that the granting of planning permission for a pair of pig houses did not alter the area in the same way that the granting of planning permission for a commercial dock had in
219:
said that easements would be transferred when they were "necessary to the reasonable enjoyment of the property". The Court of Appeal held that the use of this easement was not necessary for the enjoyment of the property.
157:, making the nuisance permissible. The Court of Appeal rejected this argument, holding that a pair of pig houses was not a sufficient development to change the nature of an area; the centre of the
225:
149:
405:
400:
177:
allowing him to use one of the two ways to access the farmhouse, which involved going between the farmhouse and farm. The second was a claim in
38:
194:
140:
49:
395:
181:, Wheeler asserting that the smell of the pigs and their excrement was interfering with his use and enjoyment of the farmhouse.
390:
385:
178:
144:
198:
190:
115:
100:
202:
119:
334:
J.P.L. (1995). "Residential property with adjoining holiday cottages – pig farm on adjacent land".
211:
364:
343:
247:
206:
123:
216:
136:
85:
17:
379:
368:
347:
174:
170:
169:
Wheeler was a veterinary surgeon who owned
Kingdown Farm House, near
161:
case had been a commercial dock, which was a sufficient development.
189:
The case was originally sent to the
Chancery Division of the
226:
Gillingham
Borough Council v Medway (Chatham) Dock Co Ltd
150:
Gillingham
Borough Council v Medway (Chatham) Dock Co Ltd
223:
On the matter of the nuisance, the defendants relied on
209:. The matter of the easement was based on the case of
111:
106:
96:
91:
81:
73:
65:
55:
45:
31:
60:Dr. Graham Edward Wheeler v J.J. Saunders Ltd
8:
37:
28:
406:Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases
355:Thompson, M.P. (1995). "Paths and pigs".
336:Journal of Planning & Environment Law
260:
7:
195:Court of Appeal of England and Wales
50:Court of Appeal of England and Wales
147:which amended the precedent set by
25:
401:1994 in United Kingdom case law
357:Conveyancer and Property Lawyer
1:
363:(July). Sweet & Maxwell.
422:
342:(7). Sweet & Maxwell.
133:Wheeler v JJ Saunders Ltd
36:
32:Wheeler v JJ Saunders Ltd
197:, where it was heard by
396:1994 in the environment
391:English nuisance cases
321:Thompson (1995) p. 244
312:Thompson (1995) p. 240
285:Thompson (1995) p. 239
18:Wheeler v Saunders Ltd
386:English tort case law
191:High Court of Justice
101:High Court of Justice
294:J.P.L. (1995) p. 620
276:J.P.L. (1995) p. 619
212:Wheeldon v Burrows
129:
128:
86:Bailii transcript
16:(Redirected from
413:
372:
351:
322:
319:
313:
310:
304:
301:
295:
292:
286:
283:
277:
274:
268:
265:
251:(1610) 77 ER 816
107:Court membership
69:19 December 1994
41:
29:
21:
421:
420:
416:
415:
414:
412:
411:
410:
376:
375:
354:
333:
330:
325:
320:
316:
311:
307:
302:
298:
293:
289:
284:
280:
275:
271:
266:
262:
258:
243:
187:
167:
141:Court of Appeal
122:
118:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
419:
417:
409:
408:
403:
398:
393:
388:
378:
377:
374:
373:
352:
329:
326:
324:
323:
314:
305:
296:
287:
278:
269:
259:
257:
254:
253:
252:
242:
239:
186:
183:
166:
163:
139:is an English
127:
126:
113:
112:Judges sitting
109:
108:
104:
103:
98:
94:
93:
89:
88:
83:
79:
78:
75:
71:
70:
67:
63:
62:
57:
56:Full case name
53:
52:
47:
43:
42:
34:
33:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
418:
407:
404:
402:
399:
397:
394:
392:
389:
387:
384:
383:
381:
370:
366:
362:
358:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
332:
331:
327:
318:
315:
309:
306:
300:
297:
291:
288:
282:
279:
273:
270:
264:
261:
255:
250:
249:
248:Aldred's Case
245:
244:
240:
238:
236:
232:
228:
227:
221:
218:
214:
213:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
184:
182:
180:
176:
172:
164:
162:
160:
156:
152:
151:
146:
142:
138:
135:
134:
125:
121:
117:
114:
110:
105:
102:
99:
95:
90:
87:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
61:
58:
54:
51:
48:
44:
40:
35:
30:
27:
19:
360:
356:
339:
335:
328:Bibliography
317:
308:
299:
290:
281:
272:
263:
246:
234:
230:
224:
222:
210:
207:Sir John May
199:Staughton LJ
188:
168:
158:
154:
148:
132:
131:
130:
124:Sir John May
116:Staughton LJ
97:Prior action
92:Case history
59:
26:
217:Thesiger LJ
137:EWCA Civ 32
77:EWCA Civ 32
380:Categories
256:References
235:Gillingham
231:Gillingham
159:Gillingham
155:Gillingham
82:Transcript
369:0010-8200
348:0307-4870
203:Gibson LJ
120:Gibson LJ
241:See also
215:, where
185:Judgment
179:nuisance
175:easement
145:nuisance
143:case on
74:Citation
66:Decided
367:
346:
303:QB 343
267:QB 343
171:Priddy
165:Facts
46:Court
365:ISSN
361:1995
344:ISSN
340:1995
205:and
382::
359:.
338:.
237:.
201:,
371:.
350:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
