Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct in deletion-related editing

1318:

indicates that the community's process isn't working and the more structured and more final method of ArbCom is appropriate to reach an acceptable outcome. Fram has presented clear evidence of that for Lugnuts and Johnpacklambert and even the "the case request has been filed" has not been enough for the community to find consensus (as it sometimes does). Others have asserted in their statements that it may be appropriate to include others. However, these assertions have not been backed up by any diffs which makes it hard for me to action them - in fact as far as I can tell the only person besides Fram to offer diffs has been ಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ around Lugnuts and sigs. So I will be voting to accept, but am holding off for the moment to give those who think there's a case beyond these two people to come with diffs to show it so I can vote to accept with what I think the scope to be.

1543:

unable to manage the issues that have popped up with respect to JPL, with only this latest discussion still unresolved. One use a case could have would be to add structure to an examination of the behavior that has generally been lacking in the community's discussions about this editor, but then ArbCom in a decision potentially ends up in the position of pre-empting a community that doesn't look finished with handling this editor's behavior. I am inclined both to accept and decline this request as a result, so count me as presently neutral. --

1335:. I think there are two related concepts I see evidence of having something appropriate for ArbCom to consider: behavior at AfD and the specific behavior of a few editors around article creation and deletion. I support a scope of both. IN terms of what specific editors, I think there is clear evidence for Lugnuts and Johnpacklambert. I'm not really opposed to Ten Pound Hammer, but am more reluctant given that there is currently clear consensus for a new restriction that remains 626: 185: 1388:. Well it seems that AfD has not controlled itself, and it is time for Doctor ArbCom to write a prescription. I would like a single combined case that includes not only the editors from the current requests, but also the editors in question from last year's request. But I want the focus to be not on editors, but on AfD itself, and how its processes do or do not work. 1913:). The February 2021 thread was closed with a warning for personal attacks and hostility towards others; the October 2021 thread was closed with a final warning. The November and June threads were closed recommending Arbitration to the editors as ANI was unable to solve the issue. Since the final warning, 7&6=thirteen leveled personal attacks at 2781: 1055: 1271:, and it's clear that this is a recurring problem that would benefit from a systematic review. I'm still not sure about what solutions might be useful, but even just collecting and synthesizing concerns around these two or three editors would help reduce how much needs to be considered in future community decision-making processes. 1228:

Reading through the various ANI threads, I do agree that a structured and systematic look at the area could help reduce problems and encourage more uninvolved editors to participate in the area. So I'm of two minds at the moment. I'd appreciate more comments on why this has gone beyond the community's ability to resolve.

2905:

The moderator(s) may decide to split the questions over two sequential requests for comment; in the event that they choose to do so, the closing panel will close both RfCs. In the event that a member of the closing panel is no longer available to close the second request for comment, that member will

2847:

While asking the enforcing administrator and seeking reviews at AN or AE are not mandatory prior to seeking a decision from the committee, once the committee has reviewed a request, further substantive review at any forum is barred. The sole exception is editors under an active sanction who may still

2814:

Administrators are free to modify sanctions placed by former administrators – that is, editors who do not have the administrator permission enabled (due to a temporary or permanent relinquishment or desysop) – without regard to the requirements of this section. If an administrator modifies a sanction

1557:

Reading into the others now as well, and it also doesn't appear that the community is unable to handle Lugnuts' behavior, again based on separate discussions having been closed successfully with sanctions. Ditto for TPH. I actually don't think there's a case here at all with these actors (at least as

1542:

Comment from the JPL request which got vanished in the merge: I think this case request is reasonable to make, and I think there is sufficient background here that a case could be taken looking into JPL's behavior, but based on a review of the threads linked, I am not sure that the community has been

2649:

The request for comment will be closed by a panel of three editors with experience closing discussions and who will be appointed by the Arbitration Committee prior to the start of the RfC. The closing panel should summarize the main points brought up in the discussion and evaluate what consensus, if

2583:

975:

I'm not generally that keen on cases about individuals, excepting advanced rights holders as there's no other place to handle. That said, there are long term issues, and so I can see that a case may be needed. If consensus is that we need two cases, so be it, but I'd prefer this was merged into one

1799:

are incompatible with this spirit. Use of the site to pursue feuds and quarrels is extremely disruptive, flies directly in the face of our key policies and goals, and is prohibited. Editors who are unable to resolve their personal or ideological differences are expected to keep mutual contact to a

1317:

I finished my read of the background information last night and I think there is something actionable for ArbCom here. But what that something is, is less clear to me. I think when there are multiple AN/ANI threads that sprawl about the same topic over a relatively concentrated period of time that

1101:

I think if a broader scope is taken that notification to WT:AFD and perhaps other similar talk pages (i.e. WT:PROD) should be done. I do not think it appropriate for ArbCom to solicit statements from specific non-parties. So it would be on the "editors and admins active in deletion" to participate

2393:) is warned against making personal attacks, engaging in battleground behavior in deletion discussions, and other disruptive deletion behavior. If Lugnuts should engage in disruptive behavior related to deletion, broadly construed, an uninvolved administrator may block him (in accordance with the 1653:

1) The purpose of Knowledge (XXG) is to create a high-quality, free-content encyclopedia in an atmosphere of camaraderie and mutual respect among contributors. Contributors whose actions are detrimental to that goal may be asked to refrain from them, even when these actions are undertaken in good

1411:

There's usually a bit of delay after passing the vote threshold because we have to pick drafters, choose parties, and hammer out the scope. That usually happens on our email list though, since its more of a brainstorming session, and requires us to juggle private concerns like "What are the Arb's

2233:

9) Partly in response to articles nominated for deletion at scale, editors interested in deletion or a particular topic have felt a need to participate in dozens of discussions at a time. This has led to low quality participation, where editors sometimes appeared to not fully research an article

1819:

7) Editors who have been sanctioned or warned, whether by the Arbitration Committee or the community, for improper conduct are expected to avoid further conduct that is inconsistent with Knowledge (XXG)'s expectations. Repeated failure to demonstrate appropriate conduct may result in the editors

1767:

the discussion. Bludgeoning exhausts other editors, dissuades further participation, wastes time, and makes discussions less effective. Editors should avoid repeating the same point or making so many comments that they dominate the discussion. Editors should particularly avoid trying to convince

1302:

would be interesting for this. (There are several other tasks near to T230653 that all discuss the issue of lint errors in signatures and being able to enforce that users have de-linted signatures, and the system does now enforce it for some kinds of lint. Not all, including outdated HTML, so it

1227:

In regards to both, I'm still grappling with whether the community is unable to handle this. Given the history of blocks and restrictions, it seems like oversight is adequate though probably not perfect; why are blocks and editing restrictions as regular admin and community actions not feasible?

1159:

I much appreciate the statements and am continuing to give them a lot of thought. I have not yet decided whether I prefer a single case or multiple cases, but I am more open to holding multiple cases than it seems other arbs are inclined to be. I am worried about carefully tailoring the scope to

2855:

All actions designated as arbitration enforcement actions, including those alleged to be out of process or against existing policy, must first be appealed following arbitration enforcement procedures to establish if such enforcement is inappropriate before the action may be reversed or formally

2851:

These provisions apply only to contentious topics placed by administrators and to blocks placed by administrators to enforce arbitration case decisions. They do not apply to sanctions directly authorised by the committee, and enacted either by arbitrators or by arbitration clerks, or to special

2622:

The moderator(s) will also be responsible for supervising the discussions, and ensuring comments remain relevant and focused. To maintain decorum, moderator(s) may collapse comments, move comments to the talk page, remove comments entirely, ban editors from the process, or take other reasonable

2618:

The moderator(s), with community feedback, will be responsible for developing the questions presented. The moderator(s) may decide to split the questions over two sequential requests for comment; in the event that they choose to do so, the closing panel will close both RfCs. In the event that a

2556:

2954:

is rescinded. There are no actions remaining in force from this remedy, so the community are free to conduct and close these and related discussions moving forward. The Committee thanks Xeno and Valereee for their work as moderators; KrakatoaKatie, RoySmith, and TheSandDoctor for their work as

2426:) is banned from taking the following actions: (1) participating in deletion discussions, broadly construed; (2) contesting a proposed deletion ("de-PRODing"); and (3) creating articles that comprise less than 500 words, including converting redirects into articles. This remedy supersedes his 1458:

be DS created as a result of this case, but rather an example remedy that would not be directly related to any of the parties involved and related to the topic area more broadly. If we were focusing purely on those two editors with no other leeway, our remedies would likely only include those

2273:

10) Individual editors may have some inclination to vote delete more, or keep more, in Articles for Deletion discussions and these editors are sometimes labeled as "inclusionists" and "deletionists". Such labels can lead to editors taking sides and otherwise engaging in battleground behavior

1027:

case request. I voted with the majority to decline, but future events suggested a case would have been helpful. I see the issues in that request to be related but distinct to these case requests. I don't want to repeat that mistake and I also don't want to overcorrect in the other direction

1022:

I have only read part of 1 section of the ANI discussion (Thinking outside the box: raise the stakes for JPL's redirects and Lugnuts' reverts) and so I have a lot of reading to do. I want to be transparent about what my thinking is going into that reading. I think I got my vote wrong in the

1970:). He has been blocked one time for violating each of these topic bans, though each block was ended early. In August 2021 he was indefinitely blocked for disruptive editing, which was lifted twelve days later with an explicit warning about deletion efforts with Category:1922 births pages ( 2203: 928: 90: 52: 1439:

the primary focus will likely be that of JPL and Lugnuts (and potentially TPH), but by not specifically making it about those two it leaves the door open for broader behavioural issues to be recognised and potentially remedied, such as the "AFD DS regime" floated by Levivich.

1383:

I went back and re-read my vote from the last AfD case request, seven months ago. At the time I expressed hope that the close of the ANI thread would solve the problem, and that the case request would put the AfD regulars on notice that standards needed to improve. As I said:

3028:(commonly known as a blank-and-redirect, or BLAR). This topic ban will be suspended for a period of 12 months. This topic ban may be unsuspended and imposed onto TenPoundHammer if disruption by BLARing restarts, as determined by any of: (1) a consensus of administrators on 1636: 85: 2235: 2239: 953:

the word counts for preliminary statements (what we're doing here) are counted separately than word counts for evidence. If the case is accepted you can definitely ask for a word count extension at that point from whomever is designated as the drafting arbs.

79: 68: 2748:

Appeals may be made only by the editor under sanction and only for a currently active sanction. Requests for modification of page restrictions may be made by any editor. The process has three possible stages (see "Important notes" below). The editor may:

2255: 74: 63: 2815:

placed by a former administrator, the administrator who made the modification becomes the "enforcing administrator". If a former administrator regains the tools, the provisions of this section again apply to their unmodified enforcement actions.

1248:, not to put you on the spot, but since you mentioned needing more than three parties, did you have any in mind? Looking through some of the discussions you (and others) linked it seems like we'd need to be careful of having the scope balloon. 1490:

As a note, my primary interest in this case request is to look at the named parties; I am not necessarily gunning for or expecting to expand too much further, but I would prefer to leave the door open for larger issues to be brought forward.

1082:

obviously the committee always invites the community to participate before the draft decision through the evidence phase and (for most cases) the workshop. Are you thinking about something beyond normal procedures with your comment? Best,

46: 1412:

real world schedules in the next month" and "Is Eek sailing to the Bahamas and therefore can't be a drafter" :P But on the more public side of things, y'all can be helpful even after the accept threshold by suggesting parties and scope.

1681:

arguments, and incivility are harmful to other editors and the proper functioning of the encyclopedia. While healthy conflict is essential to building an encyclopedia, editors who engage in unhealthy conflict may be sanctioned.

2169:

8) There is no community consensus on how to handle the consideration of mass nominations of articles at Articles for Deletion. This has created conflict in the community about how to respond to Lugnuts' article creation (e.g.

1194:. The consensus of my colleagues is to accept a single case, and while I am unsure about whether that is the best way forward, I don't think a lengthy discussion about that is worth it. I will support a single case. Best, 2810:

Nothing in this section prevents an administrator from replacing an existing sanction issued by another administrator with a new sanction if fresh misconduct has taken place after the existing sanction was applied.

1353:

I am not sure on the merits myself but I think in the interest of transparency and to allow community feedback it's worth noting that the committee is considering an interaction ban, for length of the case, between

2738:

This procedure applies to appeals related to, and modifications of, actions taken by administrators to enforce the Committee's remedies. It does not apply to appeals related to the remedies directly enacted by the

2612: 2547: 2848:

request an easing or removal of the sanction on the grounds that said sanction is no longer needed, but such requests may only be made once every six months, or whatever longer period the committee may specify.

2705:

0) Should any user subject to a restriction in this case violate that restriction, that user may be blocked, initially for up to one month, and then with blocks increasing in duration to a maximum of one year.

1736:(PROD) is a streamlined process for nominating an article for deletion. It should only be used for obvious and uncontroversial deletions where no opposition is expected. Proposed deletions are subject to the 406: 2010: 2916: 2768: 2654: 2590: 2171: 2063: 915: 910: 905: 900: 895: 890: 885: 879: 644: 443: 275: 1697:

3) Consensus is Knowledge (XXG)'s fundamental model for editorial decision-making. In most cases, consensus is an implicit process, where undisputed edits—either in article or project space—are

57: 208: 1160:

avoid (a) an unmanageably large and misshapen case and also (b) constraining our ability to tackle the actual problem here. I don't think we've reached a good scope statement yet. Best,

1339:. I also think we may need to do something similar to Iranian Politics where we add parties during the case if there is specific evidence presented of issues within the broader scope. 437: 1618: 1601: 1552: 1523: 1449: 1399: 1327: 1312: 1239: 1154: 1037: 991: 1705:

must be taken to avoid stirring up unnecessary conflict. From both a broad behavioral and content standpoint, there exist situations on Knowledge (XXG) where it preferable to be

2488:) is topic banned from deletion discussions, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. 2327:) is topic banned from deletion discussions, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. 2191: 401: 1336: 433: 229: 221: 2070:). Lugnuts has not offered any substantial help in addressing these content concerns and has sometimes removed a PROD only to vote redirect at a subsequent AfD discussion ( 2250:) and caused administrators to rely on more weighting of comments when closing, including unwritten conventions and personal knowledge of editors, in order to compensate ( 2234:

topic before leaving a comment, editors would re-use rationale at multiple pages, and editors would leave comments on many deletion discussions in a short period of time (

2215: 2211: 2207: 2187: 1768:

specific other people that they are right and the other person is wrong, and should instead focus on presenting their own ideas as clearly and concisely as possible.

375: 2303:

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

2242:). Further, one comparison of AfD in 2017 and 2022 found a similar number of nominations but a smaller number of AfD participants which exacerbates these problems ( 2619:

member of the closing panel is no longer available to close the second request for comment, that member will be replaced by the Arbitration Committee upon request.

1914: 395: 240: 218: 697: 2868: 2757: 2712: 2394: 637: 428: 366: 285: 213: 2459:) is indefinitely banned from Knowledge (XXG). This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. 793: 1386:

Perhaps AfD contributors might remember to control themselves and act in the spirit of Knowledge (XXG), for they may find our solution to be bitter medicine

2995: 841: 371: 1303:

would require community consensus here to enable it for outdated HTML. I am still reading so I do not know if outdated HTML is relevant in this case.) --

2903:

The second point is amended to read as follows: "The moderator(s), with community feedback, will be responsible for developing the questions presented.

2283: 2279: 2275: 2251: 2247: 2243: 2151: 2135: 2074: 2014: 1362:. This would be as an injunction as part of opening the case; to be made permanent it would then have to be approved as a remedy in the final decision. 381: 361: 244: 2761: 2635: 2569: 1592:

I'm dusting off the cobwebs after being inactive for a bit (thanks, COVID), but just wanted to signal my support for proceeding with a single case. --

386: 299: 280: 502: 3063: 658: 420: 311: 3079: 2627: 2561: 651: 344: 2324: 1893: 691: 270: 199: 25: 3040:

if there is opposition as indicated in condition 2. After 12 months, if it has not been imposed, the topic ban will be automatically lifted.

2360:("PRODing"), but not contesting a proposed deletion ("de-PRODing"); and (3) turning an article into a redirect. This sanction supersedes his 2353: 1959: 787: 2130:. He has regularly nominated pages for deletion, using both PROD and Articles for deletion, and participated in many other AfD discussions ( 1582: 1500: 1485: 1468: 1423: 1371: 1348: 1282: 1259: 1220: 1186: 1111: 1092: 1070: 1015: 963: 2989: 2485: 2115: 1784: 835: 745: 3036:, with no opposition from other arbitrators indicated up to 48 hours after the second support, or (3) a majority of active arbitrators at 1763:

5.1) In formal discussions, less is usually more. Editors who choose to ignore this advice by replying to a large number of comments can

901:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1065#Disruptive POINTy AfD !votes and racist comparisons by Johnpacklambert

2639: 2573: 1698: 336: 176: 2147: 906:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1073#User: Johnpacklambert emptying categories prematurely; edit warring

322: 265: 21: 3048: 2963: 2932: 2683: 2674: 2509: 2082: 2078: 1420: 1396: 1268: 581: 570: 559: 1792: 257: 2055: 307: 205: 2657:. The community retains the ability to amend the outcomes of the RfC through a subsequent community-wide request for comment. 715: 2195: 2183: 2179: 2071: 2022: 2021:, and when to nominate an article for deletion, especially in regards to articles created by Lugnuts, was criticized in the 1987: 1983: 1979: 1975: 1971: 317: 235: 2921:

The community retains the ability to amend the outcomes of the RfC through a subsequent community-wide request for comment.

2119: 2085:

and was topic banned by the community from making cosmetic changes to wikicode that have no effect on the rendered page in

1000:

a single case, around behaviour at article deletion. The three individuals who have been most discussed should be parties.

2456: 2423: 2390: 2051: 1573:

for a discussion that has been ongoing for two decades. I'm not a full decline there, but I'm definitely not an accept. --

1569:

topic, I don't think ArbCom should be touching that as out of our scope. We're here to solve specific conduct issues, not

891:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1087#Repeated instances of WP:CANVASS and WP:UNCIVIL by Lugnuts

811: 739: 3013: 859: 703: 495: 3062:

Any block, restriction, ban, or sanction performed under the authorisation of a remedy for this case must be logged at

799: 1609:

I've kind of been hanging back on this one and seeing what develops, and so a little late, but I do see a case here.

886:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1064#Mass-creating articles based on one unreliable source

3001: 2772: 2318: 1887: 1519: 1216: 1182: 1150: 1009: 985: 847: 685: 356: 1845: 1677:

by debating ideas, openly providing information, and seeking mutual understanding of an issue. Sniping criticism,

2832:(i) the clear and substantial consensus of (a) uninvolved administrators at AE or (b) uninvolved editors at AN or 2430:. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. 2364:. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter. 2356:) is banned from taking the following actions: (1) participating in deletion discussions, broadly construed; (2) 2347: 1953: 781: 2123: 1796: 460: 2983: 2803:

prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" below).

2479: 2109: 829: 2139: 195: 17: 2603:

11) The Arbitration Committee requests comment on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion.

2534:

11) The Arbitration Committee requests comment on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion.

2143: 1024: 488: 2589:

Any appeals of a moderator decision or of the panel close may only be made to the Arbitration Committee at

2066:) and to Lugnuts being topic-banned by the community from creating new articles with fewer than 500 words ( 1801: 1531:

as one case; I haven't yet gotten through all the reading, but it's clearly gotten a little out of hand.

2807:

Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped.

2314: 1883: 1536: 1515: 1001: 977: 763: 680: 118: 2126:. Concerns over TenPoundHammer's ability to close deletion discussions led to a community topic ban in 1788: 1764: 1706: 516: 2553:

The moderator(s), with community feedback, will be responsible for developing the questions presented.

1748:

is not required but considered good practice when the main concern is lack of notability or sources.

2343: 1949: 1614: 1359: 948: 776: 154: 107: 1702: 2978: 2475: 2105: 1367: 1344: 1323: 1277: 1254: 1234: 1107: 1088: 1066: 1033: 959: 824: 751: 165: 143: 1745: 1737: 1917:

towards HighKing and MrsSnoozyTurtle and displayed a battleground mentality, particularly during

1496: 1481: 1464: 1445: 657:

Actions taken to enforce remedies authorised in the case (if applicable) are to be logged at the

2642:. Comments will be accepted for 30 days, and the request for comment will be advertised on the 2576:. Comments will be accepted for 30 days, and the request for comment will be advertised on the 1962:) has been topic banned by the community from nominating more than one article per day at AfD ( 2450: 2417: 2384: 2045: 733: 129: 3037: 3033: 3025: 2643: 2577: 2357: 2018: 1841: 1733: 1714: 911:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1077#Topic Ban for Johnpacklambert

1674: 1532: 462: 113: 2631: 2608: 2565: 2543: 1918: 1897: 1864: 1741: 1670: 31: 2796:

No administrator may modify or remove a sanction placed by another administrator without:

1840:

1) A locus of dispute centers around the conduct of named parties in the mass creation of

1610: 1434: 1413: 1389: 1299: 632:

This case is closed. No edits should be made to this page except by clerks or arbitrators.

149: 102: 3029: 2615:

and the discussion will be moderated by editor(s) appointed by the Arbitration Committee.

2550:

and the discussion will be moderated by editor(s) appointed by the Arbitration Committee.

896:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1090#Lugnuts and revenge AfDs

643:

Specific requests for amendment or clarification about the decision should be raised at

465: 2058:). Most of these were stubs, and relatively few have been expanded to longer articles ( 2054:) has created the most articles of any editor with over 93 thousand article creations ( 1578: 1548: 1363: 1340: 1319: 1308: 1291: 1274: 1267:

along the same lines as WTT. I've been looking through the discussions linked here and

1251: 1245: 1231: 1210: 1176: 1144: 1103: 1102:

but we should give them a reasonable chance of finding out that there is a case. Best,

1084: 1062: 1029: 955: 160: 138: 3073: 2653:

Any appeals of a moderator decision may only be made to the Arbitration Committee at

1991: 1597: 1492: 1477: 1460: 1441: 2911:

The sixth point is amended to read as follows: "Any appeals of a moderator decision

2972:

Amendment: TenPoundHammer suspended topic ban for blank-and-redirecting (June 2024)

2446: 2413: 2380: 2041: 1408: 1355: 1123: 1098: 1077: 1044: 728: 124: 1673:

and deletion discussions. These processes work effectively when editors engage in

1295: 464: 184: 2009:

5) Johnpacklambert has a history of making many rapid !votes in AfD discussions (

2150:) and gave inappropriate notifications during a series of Postage stamp lists ( 916:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1079#Johnpacklambert

1298:

exists apparently since a few months ago, and something like my suggestion in

880:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1101#Lugnuts at AFD

2955:

closers; and all the editors who participated in these discussions to date.

1574: 1544: 1304: 1204: 1196: 1170: 1162: 1138: 1130: 1844:

and how named parties and the wider community handle those articles in the

1654:

faith; and good faith actions, where disruptive, may still be sanctioned.

2838:

is required. If consensus at AE or AN is unclear, the status quo prevails.

2138:). TenPoundHammer engaged in disruptive behavior in AfD discussions (e.g. 1804:, they may be compelled to do so through the imposition of restrictions. 2800:

the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or

2059: 1593: 1028:(accepting unnecessarily) but that request will impact my thinking here. 1639:, where comments and discussion from the voting phase is also available. 2613:

Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration Committee/Requests for comment/AfD at scale

2548:

Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration Committee/Requests for comment/AfD at scale

927:

Preliminary statements given in the case request stage may be found at

2895:, and to ratify the moderators' decision to hold two sequential RfCs, 2753:

ask the enforcing administrator to reconsider their original decision;

2017:

evidence). His judgement in deciding when to boldly redirect, when to

1669:

2) Conflict is unavoidable and an inherent part of processes like the

636:

Any violations of the remedies passed in the case should be raised at

1863:

2) A locus of dispute centers around the conduct of named parties at

3032:, (2) at least two arbitrators indicating "support" to unsuspend at 2771:. If the editor is blocked, the appeal may be made by email through 3026:

removing all content in an article and replacing it with a redirect

2888:

In order to reaffirm the independence of the RfC authorized by the

1990:, in which he was warned about potential topic ban violations, and 2246:). This has left AfD susceptible to spammers and others who sock ( 1974:). Since 2021, he was also named in extensive ANI discussions in 1244:

I appreciate the thoughts so far. I'm leaning towards accepting.

2917:

Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment

2655:

Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment

2591:

Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment

1476:(noting that this is made post-merge of the two case requests). 645:

Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment

2493:

Passed 11 to 1 with 1 abstentions at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

2291:

Passed 11 to 0 with 2 abstentions at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

2869:

procedure for the standard appeals and modifications provision

2464:

Passed 9 to 1 with 2 abstentions at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

2263:

Passed 9 to 0 with 2 abstentions at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

2159:

Passed 12 to 0 with 1 abstention at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

620: 466: 2186:) and to changes in sports notability, first with changes to 1514:

as one case. I'm inclined to include TPH as a party as well.

2062:). This led to Lugnuts's autopatrolled right being removed ( 2871:

adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.

2715:

adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.

1787:. Each and every user is expected to interact with others 1454:

For the record, I am not in any way suggesting that there

1994:, which was filed shortly before this case was opened. 3019: 3007: 2427: 2361: 2199: 2175: 2131: 2127: 2086: 2067: 1967: 1963: 1930: 1926: 1922: 1910: 1907: 1904: 1901: 1746:

A prior search for more sources to establish notability

969: 865: 853: 817: 805: 769: 757: 721: 709: 611: 605: 599: 593: 531: 524: 476: 391: 349: 225: 2941:

Amendment: Rescind deletion RfC remedy (February 2023)

2906:

be replaced by the Arbitration Committee upon request.

1717:

as is common in uncontroversial areas of the project.

1791:, calmly, and in a spirit of cooperation. Borderline 970:

Arbitrators' opinions on hearing this matter (10/1/0)

1128:

I think your statement would be helpful here. Best,

2397:) or impose on him a topic ban for up to one year. 2118:) was topic banned from all deletion activities in 2229:Low quality participation at Articles for Deletion 2077:). Lugnuts has been blocked for conduct at AfD in 1859:Locus of dispute: Conduct at Articles for Deletion 1120:I'm open to considering single or multiple cases. 2915:may only be made to the Arbitration Committee at 2713:procedure for the standard enforcement provision 1820:being subject to increasingly severe sanctions. 638:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement 2899:("Request for Comment") is amended as follows: 2524: 1982:, in which he apologized for comments he made, 1061:) the committee any relevant private evidence. 2269:Battleground behavior at Articles for Deletion 1783:6) Knowledge (XXG) is a reference work, not a 1025:November 2021 Conduct in Articles for Deletion 496: 8: 2835:(ii) a passing motion of arbitrators at ARCA 2435:Passed 10 to 1 at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC) 2402:Passed 11 to 2 at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC) 2369:Passed 13 to 0 at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC) 2332:Passed 12 to 1 at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC) 2223:Passed 13 to 0 at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC) 2094:Passed 13 to 0 at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC) 2030:Passed 13 to 0 at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC) 1999:Passed 13 to 0 at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC) 1938:Passed 13 to 0 at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC) 1872:Passed 13 to 0 at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC) 1853:Passed 13 to 0 at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC) 1825:Passed 13 to 0 at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC) 1809:Passed 13 to 0 at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC) 1773:Passed 10 to 2 at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC) 1753:Passed 13 to 0 at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC) 1722:Passed 13 to 0 at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC) 1687:Passed 12 to 0 at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC) 1659:Passed 13 to 0 at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC) 3064:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration enforcement log 2668:Passed 9 to 2 at 21:53, 2 August 2022 (UTC) 1836:Locus of dispute: Mass creation of articles 2725: 2518: 2503: 652:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Arbitration Committee 503: 489: 172: 2165:Mass nominations at Articles for Deletion 2025:that preceded the opening of this case. 976:request. Otherwise, awaiting statements. 2952:Conduct in deletion-related editing case 2947: 2896: 2773:Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee 1900:(ANI) discussions since February 2021 ( 1701:. In cases where consensus is unclear, 659:centralised arbitration enforcement log 175: 2852:functionary blocks of whatever nature. 2623:actions necessary to maintain decorum. 2557:actions necessary to maintain decorum. 1385: 2190:and later to a change to the general 1898:Administrator's Noticeboard/Incidents 1800:minimum. If battling editors fail to 591:Watchlist all case (and talk) pages: 7: 2931:Passed 6 to 0 with 2 abstentions by 2775:(or, if email access is revoked, to 276:Clarification and Amendment requests 2891:Conduct in deletion-related editing 2758:arbitration enforcement noticeboard 2628:the articles for deletion talk page 2562:the articles for deletion talk page 1635:All tallies are based the votes at 650:General questions can be raised at 3024:is indefinitely topic banned from 2767:submit a request for amendment at 1744:are considered before nomination. 1294:, no, that is not possible today. 1269:the case declined in November 2021 39: 3080:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration cases 2948:Remedy 11 ("Request for Comment") 2935:at 16:43, 21 September 2022 (UTC) 2677:at 16:43, 21 September 2022 (UTC) 2650:any, exists within the community. 2584:any, exists within the community. 2428:December 2021 community topic ban 2358:proposing an article for deletion 1915:Articles for deletion/New Chapter 563:on 16:43, 21 September 2022 (UTC) 2966:at 21:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC) 2825:For a request to succeed, either 2779: 2686:at 21:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC) 2005:Johnpacklambert deletion conduct 1944:Johnpacklambert sanction history 1053: 624: 574:on 21:26, 26 February 2023 (UTC) 183: 2792:Modifications by administrators 2644:centralized discussion template 2578:centralized discussion template 2470:TenPoundHammer topic banned (1) 2216:North8000 preliminary statement 1966:) and from religious articles ( 1896:) has been named in four large 2395:standard enforcement provision 2362:March 2017 community topic ban 2208:Ingratis preliminary statement 1713:to an edit instead of editing 1665:Healthy and unhealthy conflict 1: 2744:Appeals by sanctioned editors 2626:The RfC will be announced at 2560:The RfC will be announced at 2309:7&6=thirteen topic banned 2204:Lugnuts preliminary statement 552:on 21:54, 2 August 2022 (UTC) 2730:0) Appeals and modifications 2338:Johnpacklambert topic banned 544:on 10:53, 18 June 2022 (UTC) 407:Conflict of interest reports 3051:at 19:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC) 2856:discussed at another venue. 2762:administrators’ noticeboard 2701:Enforcement of restrictions 2636:administrators' noticeboard 2570:administrators' noticeboard 2212:Masem preliminary statement 2192:Sports notability guideline 1671:bold, revert, discuss cycle 1625:Temporary injunction (none) 1558:scoped to deletion). I'm a 585:on 19:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC) 236:Search archived proceedings 177:Knowledge (XXG) Arbitration 32:Knowledge (XXG):ARBBLUDGEON 18:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration 3096: 2882:Amendment (September 2022) 1649:Purpose of Knowledge (XXG) 514: 281:Arbitrator motion requests 2780: 2721:Appeals and modifications 2611:(RfC) will take place at 2546:(RfC) will take place at 2236:Northamerica1000 evidence 2122:, which was repealed in 1986:, closed with no action, 1978:, closed with no action, 1699:assumed to have consensus 1619:21:01, 16 June 2022 (UTC) 1602:20:17, 15 June 2022 (UTC) 1583:16:26, 15 June 2022 (UTC) 1553:23:09, 10 June 2022 (UTC) 1524:05:58, 15 June 2022 (UTC) 1501:16:40, 15 June 2022 (UTC) 1486:09:36, 15 June 2022 (UTC) 1469:09:11, 15 June 2022 (UTC) 1450:18:47, 14 June 2022 (UTC) 1424:03:08, 17 June 2022 (UTC) 1400:17:42, 14 June 2022 (UTC) 1372:18:37, 15 June 2022 (UTC) 1349:15:06, 15 June 2022 (UTC) 1328:15:05, 11 June 2022 (UTC) 1313:22:05, 10 June 2022 (UTC) 1283:21:24, 14 June 2022 (UTC) 1260:05:38, 14 June 2022 (UTC) 1240:15:16, 10 June 2022 (UTC) 1221:19:57, 17 June 2022 (UTC) 1187:06:08, 17 June 2022 (UTC) 1155:06:05, 10 June 2022 (UTC) 1112:15:57, 15 June 2022 (UTC) 1093:15:43, 15 June 2022 (UTC) 1071:17:52, 14 June 2022 (UTC) 1054: 1016:07:50, 14 June 2022 (UTC) 1742:alternatives to deletion 1038:15:02, 8 June 2022 (UTC) 992:09:28, 8 June 2022 (UTC) 964:01:55, 9 June 2022 (UTC) 874:Prior dispute resolution 2867:In accordance with the 2846: 2711:In accordance with the 2632:Arbitration Noticeboard 2566:Arbitration Noticeboard 1919:Article Rescue Squadron 929:/Preliminary statements 2756:request review at the 2200:June 2022 Village Pump 1740:, which requires that 922:Preliminary statements 53:Preliminary statements 2913:or of the panel close 2640:Village pump (policy) 2574:Village pump (policy) 2280:FeydHuxtable evidence 2240:GiantSnowman evidence 2075:BilledMammal evidence 1865:Articles for Deletion 477:Track related changes 337:Arbitration Committee 2408:Lugnuts topic banned 1779:Battleground conduct 1571:prescribe medication 1300:phab:T230653#5549304 936:Preliminary decision 882:(current discussion) 286:Enforcement requests 214:Guide to arbitration 135:Drafting arbitrators 2609:request for comment 2544:request for comment 2499:Request for Comment 2276:Scottywong evidence 2136:S Marshall evidence 2056:S Marshall evidence 2040:6) By one measure, 1709:and seek consensus 2252:JoelleJay evidence 1921:discussions (e.g. 1637:/Proposed decision 308:Contentious topics 206:Arbitration policy 3047:Passed 5 to 0 by 2962:Passed 7 to 0 by 2862: 2861: 2760:("AE") or at the 2663: 2662: 2600: 2599: 2305: 1815:Repeated behavior 1759:Bludgeoning (alt) 1734:Proposed deletion 1728:Proposed deletion 1203: 1169: 1137: 667: 666: 618: 513: 512: 480: 448: 318:General sanctions 266:All open requests 196:About arbitration 169: 158: 147: 133: 122: 111: 94: 86:Proposed decision 83: 72: 61: 50: 30:(Redirected from 3087: 3023: 2996:deleted contribs 2786: 2784: 2783: 2782: 2726: 2519: 2504: 2315:7&6=thirteen 2301: 2284:Carrite evidence 2256:Joe Roe evidence 2188:Olympic athletes 2060:Cryptic evidence 1884:7&6=thirteen 1878:7&6=thirteen 1846:deletion process 1831:Findings of fact 1793:personal attacks 1675:healthy conflict 1565:As for a larger 1516:Opabinia regalis 1438: 1418: 1394: 1281: 1258: 1238: 1201: 1167: 1135: 1127: 1081: 1060: 1058: 1057: 1056: 1048: 952: 869: 842:deleted contribs 821: 794:deleted contribs 773: 746:deleted contribs 725: 698:deleted contribs 681:7&6=thirteen 675:Involved parties 670:Case information 628: 627: 621: 617: 616: 589: 580:Case amended by 569:Case amended by 558:Case amended by 534: 527: 505: 498: 491: 479: 474: 467: 446: 402:Clerk procedures 394: 352: 323:Editor sanctions 300:Active sanctions 258:Open proceedings 228: 187: 173: 163: 152: 141: 127: 116: 105: 88: 77: 66: 55: 44: 35: 3095: 3094: 3090: 3089: 3088: 3086: 3085: 3084: 3070: 3069: 3059: 3057:Enforcement log 3043: 3042: 2981: 2974: 2958: 2957: 2943: 2927: 2926: 2922: 2914: 2907: 2884: 2879: 2863: 2819:Important notes 2778: 2776: 2731: 2723: 2703: 2698: 2664: 2601: 2527: 2512: 2501: 2472: 2443: 2410: 2377: 2344:Johnpacklambert 2340: 2311: 2299: 2271: 2231: 2167: 2102: 2038: 2011:Northamerica100 2007: 1950:Johnpacklambert 1946: 1880: 1861: 1838: 1833: 1817: 1781: 1761: 1738:deletion policy 1730: 1695: 1667: 1651: 1646: 1632: 1627: 1432: 1414: 1390: 1360:Johnpacklambert 1337:unclosed at ANI 1272: 1249: 1229: 1121: 1075: 1052: 1050: 1042: 996:I'm tilting to 972: 949:Robert McClenon 946: 943: 938: 924: 876: 827: 779: 777:Johnpacklambert 731: 683: 677: 672: 625: 619: 592: 590: 586: 575: 564: 553: 545: 538: 537: 530: 523: 519: 509: 475: 469: 468: 463: 453: 452: 451: 440: 423: 413: 412: 411: 398: 390: 378: 353: 348: 339: 329: 328: 327: 302: 292: 291: 290: 260: 250: 247: 232: 224: 202: 171: 37: 36: 29: 28: 12: 11: 5: 3093: 3091: 3083: 3082: 3072: 3071: 3058: 3055: 3054: 3053: 2979:TenPoundHammer 2976: 2975: 2973: 2970: 2969: 2968: 2945: 2944: 2942: 2939: 2938: 2937: 2925: 2924: 2920: 2912: 2909: 2904: 2886: 2885: 2883: 2880: 2878: 2875: 2874: 2873: 2860: 2859: 2858: 2857: 2853: 2849: 2845: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2839: 2836: 2833: 2827: 2826: 2805: 2804: 2801: 2794: 2793: 2789: 2788: 2765: 2754: 2746: 2745: 2733: 2732: 2729: 2724: 2722: 2719: 2718: 2717: 2702: 2699: 2697: 2694: 2693: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2661: 2660: 2659: 2658: 2651: 2647: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2585: 2581: 2558: 2554: 2551: 2529: 2528: 2522: 2517: 2514: 2513: 2507: 2502: 2500: 2497: 2496: 2495: 2476:TenPoundHammer 2471: 2468: 2467: 2466: 2442: 2441:Lugnuts banned 2439: 2438: 2437: 2409: 2406: 2405: 2404: 2376: 2375:Lugnuts warned 2373: 2372: 2371: 2339: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2310: 2307: 2298: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2270: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2248:MER-C evidence 2230: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2166: 2163: 2162: 2161: 2152:LaundryPizza03 2106:TenPoundHammer 2101: 2100:TenPoundHammer 2098: 2097: 2096: 2037: 2034: 2033: 2032: 2006: 2003: 2002: 2001: 1945: 1942: 1941: 1940: 1879: 1876: 1875: 1874: 1860: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1837: 1834: 1832: 1829: 1828: 1827: 1816: 1813: 1812: 1811: 1780: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1760: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1729: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1694: 1691: 1690: 1689: 1666: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1650: 1647: 1645: 1642: 1631: 1630:Final decision 1628: 1626: 1623: 1622: 1621: 1604: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1563: 1540: 1526: 1509: 1508: 1507: 1506: 1505: 1504: 1503: 1429: 1428: 1427: 1426: 1403: 1402: 1378: 1377: 1376: 1375: 1374: 1315: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1189: 1118: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1073: 1049:please email ( 1020: 1019: 1018: 971: 968: 967: 966: 942: 939: 937: 934: 923: 920: 919: 918: 913: 908: 903: 898: 893: 888: 883: 875: 872: 871: 870: 825:TenPoundHammer 822: 774: 726: 676: 673: 671: 668: 665: 664: 663: 662: 655: 648: 641: 629: 588: 578: 567: 556: 548: 540: 536: 535: 528: 520: 515: 511: 510: 508: 507: 500: 493: 485: 482: 481: 471: 470: 461: 459: 458: 455: 454: 450: 449: 441: 436: 431: 425: 424: 419: 418: 415: 414: 410: 409: 404: 399: 389: 384: 379: 374: 369: 364: 359: 354: 347: 341: 340: 335: 334: 331: 330: 326: 325: 320: 315: 304: 303: 298: 297: 294: 293: 289: 288: 283: 278: 273: 268: 262: 261: 256: 255: 252: 251: 249: 248: 243: 238: 233: 223: 216: 211: 203: 198: 192: 189: 188: 180: 179: 42:Main case page 40: 38: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3092: 3081: 3078: 3077: 3075: 3068: 3067: 3065: 3056: 3052: 3050: 3045: 3044: 3041: 3039: 3035: 3031: 3027: 3021: 3018: 3015: 3012: 3009: 3006: 3003: 3000: 2997: 2994: 2991: 2988: 2985: 2980: 2971: 2967: 2965: 2960: 2959: 2956: 2953: 2949: 2940: 2936: 2934: 2929: 2928: 2918: 2910: 2902: 2901: 2900: 2898: 2894: 2892: 2881: 2876: 2872: 2870: 2865: 2864: 2854: 2850: 2844: 2843: 2837: 2834: 2831: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2824: 2823: 2822: 2820: 2816: 2812: 2808: 2802: 2799: 2798: 2797: 2791: 2790: 2785:wikimedia.org 2774: 2770: 2766: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2743: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2735: 2734: 2728: 2727: 2720: 2716: 2714: 2709: 2708: 2707: 2700: 2695: 2687: 2685: 2682:Rescinded by 2680: 2679: 2678: 2676: 2671: 2670: 2669: 2666: 2665: 2656: 2652: 2648: 2645: 2641: 2637: 2633: 2629: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2614: 2610: 2606: 2605: 2604: 2594: 2592: 2587: 2586: 2582: 2579: 2575: 2571: 2567: 2563: 2559: 2555: 2552: 2549: 2545: 2541: 2539: 2538: 2536: 2535: 2531: 2530: 2526: 2521: 2520: 2516: 2515: 2511: 2508:Rescinded by 2506: 2505: 2498: 2494: 2491: 2490: 2489: 2487: 2484: 2481: 2477: 2469: 2465: 2462: 2461: 2460: 2458: 2455: 2452: 2448: 2440: 2436: 2433: 2432: 2431: 2429: 2425: 2422: 2419: 2415: 2407: 2403: 2400: 2399: 2398: 2396: 2392: 2389: 2386: 2382: 2374: 2370: 2367: 2366: 2365: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2352: 2349: 2345: 2337: 2333: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2326: 2323: 2320: 2316: 2308: 2306: 2304: 2296: 2292: 2289: 2288: 2287: 2285: 2281: 2277: 2268: 2264: 2261: 2260: 2259: 2257: 2253: 2249: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2228: 2224: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2205: 2201: 2197: 2196:June 2022 ANI 2193: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2173: 2164: 2160: 2157: 2156: 2155: 2153: 2149: 2145: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2132:June 2022 ANI 2129: 2125: 2121: 2117: 2114: 2111: 2107: 2099: 2095: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2088: 2087:February 2022 2084: 2080: 2076: 2073: 2072:June 2022 ANI 2069: 2065: 2061: 2057: 2053: 2050: 2047: 2043: 2035: 2031: 2028: 2027: 2026: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2004: 2000: 1997: 1996: 1995: 1993: 1989: 1988:December 2021 1985: 1981: 1977: 1976:February 2021 1973: 1969: 1965: 1961: 1958: 1955: 1951: 1943: 1939: 1936: 1935: 1934: 1932: 1928: 1927:December 2021 1924: 1923:November 2021 1920: 1916: 1912: 1909: 1906: 1903: 1899: 1895: 1892: 1889: 1885: 1877: 1873: 1870: 1869: 1868: 1866: 1858: 1854: 1851: 1850: 1849: 1847: 1843: 1835: 1830: 1826: 1823: 1822: 1821: 1814: 1810: 1807: 1806: 1805: 1803: 1798: 1794: 1790: 1786: 1778: 1774: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1766: 1758: 1754: 1751: 1750: 1749: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1727: 1723: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1716: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1700: 1692: 1688: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1680: 1676: 1672: 1664: 1660: 1657: 1656: 1655: 1648: 1643: 1641: 1640: 1638: 1629: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1612: 1608: 1605: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1588: 1584: 1580: 1576: 1572: 1568: 1564: 1561: 1556: 1555: 1554: 1550: 1546: 1541: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1527: 1525: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1510: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1489: 1488: 1487: 1483: 1479: 1475: 1472: 1471: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1457: 1453: 1452: 1451: 1447: 1443: 1436: 1431: 1430: 1425: 1422: 1419: 1417: 1410: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1401: 1398: 1395: 1393: 1387: 1382: 1379: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1361: 1357: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1338: 1334: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1325: 1321: 1316: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1290: 1284: 1279: 1276: 1270: 1266: 1263: 1262: 1261: 1256: 1253: 1247: 1243: 1242: 1241: 1236: 1233: 1226: 1222: 1218: 1215: 1212: 1209: 1206: 1199: 1198: 1193: 1190: 1188: 1184: 1181: 1178: 1175: 1172: 1165: 1164: 1158: 1157: 1156: 1152: 1149: 1146: 1143: 1140: 1133: 1132: 1125: 1119: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1100: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1090: 1086: 1079: 1074: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1059:wikimedia.org 1046: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1035: 1031: 1026: 1021: 1017: 1013: 1012: 1007: 1006: 1005: 999: 995: 994: 993: 989: 988: 983: 982: 981: 974: 973: 965: 961: 957: 950: 945: 944: 940: 935: 933: 932: 930: 921: 917: 914: 912: 909: 907: 904: 902: 899: 897: 894: 892: 889: 887: 884: 881: 878: 877: 873: 867: 864: 861: 858: 855: 852: 849: 846: 843: 840: 837: 834: 831: 826: 823: 819: 816: 813: 810: 807: 804: 801: 798: 795: 792: 789: 786: 783: 778: 775: 771: 768: 765: 762: 759: 756: 753: 750: 747: 744: 741: 738: 735: 730: 727: 723: 720: 717: 714: 711: 708: 705: 702: 699: 696: 693: 690: 687: 682: 679: 678: 674: 669: 660: 656: 653: 649: 646: 642: 639: 635: 634: 633: 630: 623: 622: 615: 614: 609: 608: 603: 602: 597: 596: 587: 584: 583: 576: 573: 572: 565: 562: 561: 554: 551: 546: 543: 533: 529: 526: 522: 521: 518: 506: 501: 499: 494: 492: 487: 486: 484: 483: 478: 473: 472: 457: 456: 445: 442: 439: 435: 432: 430: 427: 426: 422: 417: 416: 408: 405: 403: 400: 397: 393: 388: 385: 383: 380: 377: 373: 370: 368: 365: 363: 360: 358: 355: 351: 346: 343: 342: 338: 333: 332: 324: 321: 319: 316: 313: 309: 306: 305: 301: 296: 295: 287: 284: 282: 279: 277: 274: 272: 271:Case requests 269: 267: 264: 263: 259: 254: 253: 246: 242: 239: 237: 234: 231: 227: 222: 220: 217: 215: 212: 210: 207: 204: 201: 197: 194: 193: 191: 190: 186: 182: 181: 178: 174: 170: 167: 162: 156: 151: 145: 140: 136: 131: 126: 120: 115: 109: 104: 100: 96: 92: 87: 81: 76: 70: 65: 59: 54: 48: 43: 33: 27: 23: 19: 3061: 3060: 3046: 3016: 3010: 3004: 2998: 2992: 2986: 2977: 2961: 2951: 2946: 2930: 2890: 2889: 2887: 2866: 2818: 2817: 2813: 2809: 2806: 2795: 2747: 2737: 2736: 2710: 2704: 2681: 2672: 2667: 2602: 2588: 2540: 2537: 2533: 2532: 2492: 2482: 2473: 2463: 2453: 2444: 2434: 2420: 2411: 2401: 2387: 2378: 2368: 2350: 2341: 2331: 2321: 2312: 2302: 2300: 2290: 2272: 2262: 2244:Liz evidence 2232: 2222: 2168: 2158: 2124:October 2019 2120:January 2018 2112: 2103: 2093: 2048: 2039: 2029: 2008: 1998: 1956: 1947: 1937: 1890: 1881: 1871: 1862: 1852: 1839: 1824: 1818: 1808: 1797:edit-warring 1785:battleground 1782: 1772: 1762: 1752: 1731: 1721: 1710: 1696: 1686: 1678: 1668: 1658: 1652: 1634: 1633: 1606: 1589: 1570: 1566: 1559: 1528: 1511: 1473: 1455: 1415: 1391: 1380: 1332: 1296:phab:T306574 1264: 1213: 1207: 1195: 1191: 1179: 1173: 1161: 1147: 1141: 1129: 1010: 1003: 1002: 997: 986: 979: 978: 926: 925: 862: 856: 850: 844: 838: 832: 814: 808: 802: 796: 790: 784: 766: 760: 754: 748: 742: 736: 718: 712: 706: 700: 694: 688: 631: 612: 606: 600: 594: 579: 577: 568: 566: 557: 555: 549: 547: 541: 539: 134: 98: 97: 95: 41: 3066:, not here. 2764:("AN"); and 2696:Enforcement 2673:Amended by 2523:Amended by 1533:Enterprisey 941:Clerk notes 550:Case closed 542:Case opened 241:Ban appeals 219:Noticeboard 114:Dreamy Jazz 99:Case clerks 3014:block user 3008:filter log 2877:Amendments 2739:Committee. 2638:, and the 2572:, and the 2172:April 2021 2140:April 2022 2083:April 2022 2079:March 2022 2064:April 2021 2023:ANI thread 1980:April 2021 1703:extra care 1679:ad hominem 1644:Principles 1611:Beeblebrox 1435:Moneytrees 1416:CaptainEek 1392:CaptainEek 860:block user 854:filter log 812:block user 806:filter log 764:block user 758:filter log 716:block user 710:filter log 447:(pre-2016) 434:Statistics 367:Procedures 150:CaptainEek 103:Guerillero 3020:block log 2897:Remedy 11 2777:arbcom-en 2184:June 2022 2148:June 2022 2128:June 2022 1992:June 2022 1984:July 2021 1972:Sept 2021 1931:June 2022 1802:disengage 1693:Consensus 1459:editors. 1364:Barkeep49 1341:Barkeep49 1320:Barkeep49 1292:Folly Mox 1246:JayBeeEll 1104:Barkeep49 1085:Barkeep49 1063:Barkeep49 1051:arbcom-en 1030:Barkeep49 956:Barkeep49 866:block log 818:block log 770:block log 722:block log 532:WP:ARBDEL 525:WP:ARBXFD 517:Shortcuts 372:Elections 161:Wugapodes 139:Barkeep49 3074:Category 2990:contribs 2486:contribs 2457:contribs 2424:contribs 2391:contribs 2354:contribs 2325:contribs 2297:Remedies 2180:Feb 2022 2176:Dec 2021 2144:May 2022 2116:contribs 2068:Dec 2021 2052:contribs 1968:Sep 2021 1964:Mar 2017 1960:contribs 1929:, & 1911:Jun 2022 1908:Nov 2021 1905:Oct 2021 1902:Feb 2021 1894:contribs 1765:bludgeon 1707:cautious 1493:Primefac 1478:Primefac 1461:Primefac 1442:Primefac 1278:a·po·des 1255:a·po·des 1235:a·po·des 836:contribs 788:contribs 740:contribs 692:contribs 75:Workshop 64:Evidence 24:‎ | 22:Requests 20:‎ | 3038:WP:ARCA 3034:WP:ARCA 2950:of the 2447:Lugnuts 2414:Lugnuts 2381:Lugnuts 2042:Lugnuts 2036:Lugnuts 2015:Vaulter 1867:(AfD). 1789:civilly 1560:decline 1409:Mhawk10 1356:Lugnuts 1124:Lugnuts 1099:Joe Roe 1078:Joe Roe 1045:Lugnuts 729:Lugnuts 444:Reports 382:History 362:Members 357:Contact 345:Discuss 209:(CU/OS) 125:Firefly 3049:motion 2964:motion 2933:motion 2769:"ARCA" 2684:motion 2675:motion 2634:, the 2630:, the 2568:, the 2564:, the 2525:motion 2510:motion 1715:boldly 1607:Accept 1590:Accept 1529:Accept 1512:Accept 1474:Accept 1381:Accept 1333:Accept 1265:Accept 1197:KevinL 1192:Accept 1163:KevinL 1131:KevinL 998:Accept 582:motion 571:motion 560:motion 387:Clerks 245:Report 159:& 148:& 123:& 112:& 3030:WP:AE 2474:9.1) 2412:6.1) 2194:(e.g 1842:stubs 1711:prior 1537:talk! 607:Wshp. 595:Front 421:Audit 16:< 3002:logs 2984:talk 2893:case 2607:The 2542:The 2480:talk 2451:talk 2418:talk 2385:talk 2348:talk 2319:talk 2110:talk 2081:and 2046:talk 2019:PROD 2013:and 1954:talk 1888:talk 1795:and 1615:talk 1598:talk 1579:talk 1575:Izno 1549:talk 1545:Izno 1520:talk 1497:talk 1482:talk 1465:talk 1456:will 1446:talk 1368:talk 1358:and 1345:talk 1324:talk 1309:talk 1305:Izno 1275:Wug· 1252:Wug· 1232:Wug· 1205:L235 1171:L235 1139:L235 1108:talk 1089:talk 1067:talk 1034:talk 1011:talk 1004:Worm 987:talk 980:Worm 960:talk 848:logs 830:talk 800:logs 782:talk 752:logs 734:talk 704:logs 686:talk 438:Talk 429:Talk 396:Talk 376:Talk 230:Talk 200:Talk 166:Talk 155:Talk 144:Talk 130:Talk 119:Talk 108:Talk 91:Talk 80:Talk 69:Talk 58:Talk 47:Talk 26:Case 2445:7) 2379:6) 2342:4) 2313:2) 2286:). 2258:). 2218:). 2154:). 2104:7) 2089:. 1948:4) 1933:). 1882:3) 1732:4) 1594:BDD 1567:AfD 1202:aka 1168:aka 1136:aka 613:PD. 601:Ev. 312:Log 3076:: 2919:. 2821:: 2787:). 2282:, 2278:, 2254:, 2238:, 2214:, 2210:, 2206:, 2202:, 2198:, 2182:, 2178:, 2174:, 2146:, 2142:, 2134:, 1925:, 1848:. 1617:) 1600:) 1581:) 1551:) 1522:) 1499:) 1484:) 1467:) 1448:) 1370:) 1347:) 1326:) 1311:) 1273:— 1250:— 1230:— 1219:) 1185:) 1153:) 1110:) 1091:) 1069:) 1036:) 1014:) 990:) 962:) 610:, 604:, 598:, 137:: 101:: 84:— 73:— 62:— 51:— 3022:) 3017:· 3011:· 3005:· 2999:· 2993:· 2987:· 2982:( 2923:" 2908:" 2646:. 2593:. 2580:. 2483:· 2478:( 2454:· 2449:( 2421:· 2416:( 2388:· 2383:( 2351:· 2346:( 2322:· 2317:( 2274:( 2113:· 2108:( 2049:· 2044:( 1957:· 1952:( 1891:· 1886:( 1613:( 1596:( 1577:( 1562:. 1547:( 1539:) 1535:( 1518:( 1495:( 1480:( 1463:( 1444:( 1437:: 1433:@ 1421:⚓ 1397:⚓ 1366:( 1343:( 1322:( 1307:( 1280: 1257: 1237: 1217:c 1214:· 1211:t 1208:· 1200:( 1183:c 1180:· 1177:t 1174:· 1166:( 1151:c 1148:· 1145:t 1142:· 1134:( 1126:: 1122:@ 1106:( 1097:@ 1087:( 1080:: 1076:@ 1065:( 1047:: 1043:@ 1032:( 1008:( 984:( 958:( 951:: 947:@ 931:. 868:) 863:· 857:· 851:· 845:· 839:· 833:· 828:( 820:) 815:· 809:· 803:· 797:· 791:· 785:· 780:( 772:) 767:· 761:· 755:· 749:· 743:· 737:· 732:( 724:) 719:· 713:· 707:· 701:· 695:· 689:· 684:( 661:. 654:. 647:. 640:. 504:e 497:t 490:v 392:+ 350:+ 314:) 310:( 226:+ 168:) 164:( 157:) 153:( 146:) 142:( 132:) 128:( 121:) 117:( 110:) 106:( 93:) 89:( 82:) 78:( 71:) 67:( 60:) 56:( 49:) 45:( 34:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct in deletion-related editing - Knowledge (XXG)

Index