821:
of
Knowledge (XXG). The issue reduces down to the whether the most prevalent notations and units in a particular field/context should be used or the most "correct" and universal notations and units and what weight should be used in representing them in articles. There are of course factors beyond commonality of usage that do come into play that can make this complex; however, the positions that Kehrli takes are far from the sort of subtlety you might expect from the average editor. This case involves two notations/units. One has many literature sources over many years the other essentially one (from 2010), although Kehrli interprets a couple others to his/her favor. There are no harmonization committees that have even considered weighing in on this. There are some documents that have broad applicability that could possibly be interpreted to suggest that one is better than the other, maybe. The only person doing such interpretations is Kehrli. Essentially, Kehrli claims that we should use this new notation because it is better in his/her opinion. This particular case is a good example, but please look beyond it and find a persistent solution. Should common units that might be interpreted here on Knowledge (XXG) discussion pages as being on conflict with metrological standards be deprecated by Wikipedians, themselves? Should nascent units that are consistent with metrological standards trump established, common units that are not (according to whom)? Should we have a wikipedia page about every unit ever proposed, but that has really never/yet taken off? Does context matter? Can different fields use different units? I think all of this is well summarized in Knowledge (XXG) documents such as weight, yet in this case there needs to a persistent and enforceable guidance for Kehrli as he/she persistently misinterprets these over many years and is not open to guidance that lacks teeth. --
151:
904:
chemistry-centric view and misses the bigger picture. He does not realize that
Knowledge (XXG) is not a site for chemists and that therefore a language must be used that is free of jargon and that can be understood by regular Knowledge (XXG) users. This translation from jargon to understandable language is what I have been promoting. The "understandable language" is given by the
1526:
1592:
While asking the enforcing administrator and seeking reviews at AN or AE are not mandatory prior to seeking a decision from the committee, once the committee has reviewed a request, further substantive review at any forum is barred. The sole exception is editors under an active sanction who may still
1559:
Administrators are free to modify sanctions placed by former administrators – that is, editors who do not have the administrator permission enabled (due to a temporary or permanent relinquishment or desysop) – without regard to the requirements of this section. If an administrator modifies a sanction
899:
Kmurray tries to frame the issue as a disagreement on methods. This is not true. It is purely a disagreement on terminology. Kmurray pushes an outdated chemistry jargon that nobody can understand outside chemistry. Unfortunately, this outdated jargon is still used in chemistry even though it does not
820:
The case has already been accepted and
Kkmurray has given an excellent statement above. I will only add that I would like to see as an outcome a more persistent solution to the problem than resolving this one issue. This is not a content dispute per se, it is a philosophical dispute about the nature
911:
This is in some way a continuation of the case that resulted in a ban and editing block in 2006. This ban was the result of ambiguous wording in an article to which I referred. In the mean time, one of the authors of this article in question came to
Knowledge (XXG) and clarified the ambiguity in my
891:
The current dispute relates to the terminology used to describe "Kendrick analysis". Kmurray insists on a term "Kendrick mass" that is not properly defined and hence the understanding what it means is ambiguous. Kmurray failed to give a definition and its source of "Kendrick mass". Still he insists
798:
The current dispute relates to the units associated with the quantity called
Kendrick mass. The majority of sources identified in the mediation process indicate that the unit associated with Kendrick mass is the Dalton unit (abbreviated Da). The minority source view is that the unit associated with
794:
in the articles in question. Thanks to the guidance of the
Mediation Cabal over the past few months, important issues of sources and weight related to the article content have been thoroughly discussed. Unfortunately, the unwillingness of Kehrli to compromise has moved the dispute beyond article
1600:
All actions designated as arbitration enforcement actions, including those alleged to be out of process or against existing policy, must first be appealed following arbitration enforcement procedures to establish if such enforcement is inappropriate before the action may be reversed or formally
1596:
These provisions apply only to contentious topics placed by administrators and to blocks placed by administrators to enforce arbitration case decisions. They do not apply to sanctions directly authorised by the committee, and enacted either by arbitrators or by arbitration clerks, or to special
929:
If we continue with arbitration, the real issue (jargon vs. understandable language) will not be judged properly because this can only be done by experts in metrology. It will come down to a judgment about formal editing behavior. Even then I should win this case because
Kmurray has engaged in
807:
article, 2) in the article lead cite the majority view of the "Dalton unit" approach and note the minority view of the "Kendrick unit" approach, and 3) include an additional mention of the
Kendrick unit approach in the article body. This compromise was supported by Kkmurray and Nick Y. but not
1228:
3) Knowledge (XXG) is not a venue for advocating or advancing a viewpoint or position. Editors should ensure that the reporting of different views on a subject adequately reflects the relative levels of support for those views, and that it does not give a false impression of parity, or give
903:
Kmurray claims a majority position without having supplied any proofs or sources for that claim. He also relates his "majority position" to the chemistry community, which is not appropriate. Majority in this case should refer to the whole field of science. All in all
Kmurray has a very
918:. Therefore the ban of 2006 was inappropriate in hindsight. However, I have to admit that my editing style was a bit rough at that time. Today I have learned and I claim that Kmurray is now the rougher editor. For example he renamed a page I created without discussion.
528:
Please do not edit this page directly unless you are either 1) an
Arbitrator, 2) an Arbitration Clerk, or 3) adding yourself to this case. Statements on this page are original comments provided when the Committee was initially requested to Arbitrate this page (at
1493:
Appeals may be made only by the editor under sanction and only for a currently active sanction. Requests for modification of page restrictions may be made by any editor. The process has three possible stages (see "Important notes" below). The editor may:
1560:
placed by a former administrator, the administrator who made the modification becomes the "enforcing administrator". If a former administrator regains the tools, the provisions of this section again apply to their unmodified enforcement actions.
921:
I do not think arbitration is the correct venue. This case is purely technical and should go to mediation with a mediator that is an expert in metrology. The limited information from the user pages would lead me to believe that
811:
This is a continuation of tendentious editing in articles related to mass and mass units that resulted in Kehrli's ban and editing block in 2006. Arbitration appears to be the only remaining recourse in the current situation.
76:
1555:
Nothing in this section prevents an administrator from replacing an existing sanction issued by another administrator with a new sanction if fresh misconduct has taken place after the existing sanction was applied.
1483:
This procedure applies to appeals related to, and modifications of, actions taken by administrators to enforce the Committee's remedies. It does not apply to appeals related to the remedies directly enacted by the
892:
on this term. This is ok with me. What is not ok is that he deletes and changes my articles and my edits which use better, more modern and well defined terminology that is according to the international rules of
878:
Kmurray has good intentions but also has deeply held misconceptions and an unwillingness to negotiate and compromise coupled with aggressive POV editing that make it impossible for him to follow the concepts of
1593:
request an easing or removal of the sanction on the grounds that said sanction is no longer needed, but such requests may only be made once every six months, or whatever longer period the committee may specify.
1450:
0) Should any user subject to a restriction in this case violate that restriction, that user may be blocked, initially for up to one month, and then with blocks increasing in duration to a maximum of one year.
560:
1161:
887:
in the articles in question. The Mediation Cabal over the past few months failed due to the lack of technical knowledge of the mediator, the unwillingness of Kmurray to provide sources and to compromise.
545:
71:
785:
Kehrli has good intentions but also has deeply held misconceptions and an unwillingness to negotiate and compromise coupled with aggressive POV editing that make it impossible to follow the concepts of
372:
1513:
908:
which is an international consensus on language on quantities and units. However, the understandable language I choose can also be sourced from chemistry publications about the Kendrick analysis.
409:
241:
65:
54:
1626:
Log any block, restriction, ban or extension under any remedy in this decision here. Minimum information includes name of administrator, date and time, what was done and the basis for doing it.
174:
926:
has a strong technology background and is maybe best qualified to understand the issue and do a proper mediation. However, I do understand that I may be too late with this suggestion.
541:
534:
403:
60:
49:
1178:
1) The purpose of Knowledge (XXG) is to create a high-quality, free-content encyclopedia in an atmosphere of camaraderie and mutual respect among contributors. Use of the site for
1271:. Articles may not contain any original synthesis, that is, a combination or analysis of published material that serves to advance a position not clearly stated by the sources.
367:
43:
399:
195:
187:
808:
supported by Kehrli. While informal mediation was successful at identifying appropriate sources, it was ultimately unsuccessful in achieving agreement on due weight.
341:
1406:
Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.
361:
206:
184:
1613:
1502:
1457:
1032:. This also is a tentative accept in that it's subject to reviewing Kehrli's statement, but given that we've been here before I think we will need to proceed.
394:
332:
251:
179:
752:
1252:
within the field. Exceptions may be made for valid reasons, such as in historical contexts, or in articles concerning the units of measurement themselves.
1213:, rather than through adversarial or tendentious editing. Sustained editorial conflict or edit-warring is not an appropriate method of resolving disputes.
128:
337:
347:
327:
210:
1506:
352:
265:
246:
468:
1128:
1116:
1101:
1084:
1072:
1055:
1041:
1024:
1009:
997:
980:
960:
386:
277:
1678:
310:
123:
1248:
4.2) Articles containing units of scientific measurement should generally use the units and notations that are used most often by contemporary
533:), and serve as opening statements; as such, they should not be altered. Any evidence you wish to provide to the Arbitrators should go on the
236:
165:
25:
1313:
905:
589:
556:
530:
1187:
1183:
1179:
641:
689:
302:
142:
1209:
2) Knowledge (XXG) works by building consensus through the use of polite discussion—involving the wider community, if necessary—and
1191:
799:
Kendrick mass is a new Kendrick unit (abbreviated Ke). The compromise proposed by mediator Lord Roem was 1) merge the content fork
288:
231:
21:
544:. That page may also be used for general comments on the evidence. Arbitrators will then vote on a final decision in the case at
1356:) asserts that the Dalton is not commonly accepted, and that its use violates Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines against inaccessible
223:
780:
273:
171:
1307:
976:
583:
283:
201:
635:
1640:
1427:
1386:
1353:
930:
disruptive editing by renaming an article I created without any prior discussion and thereby started the case (see diff
778:
683:
461:
1430:) is indefinitely topic banned from metrology-related articles, broadly defined, including talk pages and discussions.
1517:
322:
1577:(i) the clear and substantial consensus of (a) uninvolved administrators at AE or (b) uninvolved editors at AN or
426:
1548:
prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" below).
103:
161:
17:
454:
775:
1331:
607:
1660:
1552:
Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped.
1149:
1037:
850:
830:
659:
117:
540:
Arbitrators, the parties, and other editors may suggest proposed principles, findings, and remedies at
1656:
1319:
1051:
993:
756:
707:
595:
1006:
956:
923:
647:
98:
1357:
880:
860:
856:
787:
736:
732:
1301:
1125:
1097:
970:
768:
695:
577:
1230:
1109:
1081:
900:
comply with the IUPAC green book, e.g. the rules of terminology that the chemists agreed on.
826:
629:
884:
791:
1634:
1421:
1380:
1347:
1068:
1033:
1019:
677:
428:
112:
1652:
1541:
No administrator may modify or remove a sanction placed by another administrator without:
989:
965:
Ditto, looks like all options of dispute resolution or consensus-finding have been tried.
872:
800:
748:
1268:
1249:
1210:
431:
952:
760:
555:
as needed, but this page should not be edited otherwise. Please raise any questions at
1672:
1296:
1292:
1140:
1093:
966:
868:
841:
804:
764:
744:
572:
92:
1647:. It was decided to withhold a block this time but log a warning of future action.
864:
822:
624:
430:
150:
1389:) has improperly used sources to support his views on the use of Kendrick units.
1291:
1) The focus of the dispute is a disagreement over the proper unit for measuring
840:(Clerk note) No statement was provided by this party before the time of opening.
1630:
1417:
1376:
1343:
1064:
740:
672:
777:(denied as too old; needing a new case), then went through informal mediation
1342:
and others say the Dalton unit is the most commonly used and accepted, while
893:
1583:
is required. If consensus at AE or AN is unclear, the status quo prevails.
1545:
the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or
751:. The dispute is similar to one resolved in 2006 in the arbitration case
87:
767:. The recent issue has over the past year been extensively discussed at
1018:
at this point, it seems it's reached the threshold for Arbcom's remit.
1498:
ask the enforcing administrator to reconsider their original decision;
1516:. If the editor is blocked, the appeal may be made by email through
561:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Arbitration enforcement
557:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration#Requests for clarification
1643:) — Warned for violation of his topic ban from metrology, per
1614:
procedure for the standard appeals and modifications provision
795:
sources and content and into the area of disruptive editing.
774:
was proposed as an amendment to the resolved arbitration case
432:
947:
Waiting for other statements, but my first inclination is to
1616:
adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.
1460:
adopted 3 May 2014, this provision did not require a vote.
552:
1194:, and political or ideological struggle, is prohibited.
941:
1648:
1644:
1337:
1325:
931:
916:
913:
772:
713:
701:
665:
653:
613:
601:
518:
512:
506:
500:
442:
357:
315:
191:
942:
Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter (10/0/0/0)
1164:, where vote counts and comments are also available.
1295:; namely, whether to use Dalton or Kendrick units.
915:and complained to Kmurray about his editing style
1458:procedure for the standard enforcement provision
1139:(Clerk note) There was no temporary injunction.
551:Once the case is closed, editors may add to the
753:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/Kehrli
462:
8:
1580:(ii) a passing motion of arbitrators at ARCA
1435:Passed 13 to 0 at 17:09, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
1394:Passed 13 to 0 at 17:09, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
1365:Passed 13 to 0 at 17:09, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
1276:Passed 13 to 0 at 17:09, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
1257:Passed 13 to 0 at 17:09, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
1238:Passed 13 to 0 at 17:09, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
1218:Passed 13 to 0 at 17:09, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
1199:Passed 13 to 0 at 17:09, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
1470:
469:
455:
138:
755:that involved the mass and unit articles
951:, as other forms of DR have been tried.
1518:Special:EmailUser/Arbitration Committee
559:, and report violations of remedies at
141:
1597:functionary blocks of whatever nature.
553:#Log of blocks, bans, and restrictions
1622:Log of blocks, bans, and restrictions
906:international vocabulary of metrology
7:
1520:(or, if email access is revoked, to
1267:5) Knowledge (XXG) does not publish
242:Clarification and Amendment requests
1503:arbitration enforcement noticeboard
1512:submit a request for amendment at
782:that was ultimately unsuccessful.
32:
1679:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration cases
1570:For a request to succeed, either
1524:
1188:furtherance of outside conflicts
485:on 15:03, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
149:
124:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry
1537:Modifications by administrators
1263:Original research and synthesis
863:and the disruptive editing of
739:and the disruptive editing of
1:
1489:Appeals by sanctioned editors
1150:15:06, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
1129:16:07, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
1117:08:40, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
1102:07:49, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
1085:03:42, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
1073:03:20, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
1056:00:23, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
851:15:06, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
831:03:06, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
492:on 17:11, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
1475:0) Appeals and modifications
1042:23:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
1025:23:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
1010:22:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
998:20:53, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
981:19:58, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
961:19:40, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
373:Conflict of interest reports
1601:discussed at another venue.
1507:administrators’ noticeboard
1446:Enforcement of restrictions
1135:Temporary injunction (none)
202:Search archived proceedings
143:Knowledge (XXG) Arbitration
18:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration
1695:
1190:, publishing or promoting
1174:Purpose of Knowledge (XXG)
498:Watchlist all case pages:
247:Arbitrator motion requests
1525:
1466:Appeals and modifications
1021:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
771:, has gone through a RfC,
1661:04:34, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
531:Requests for arbitration
1612:In accordance with the
1591:
1456:In accordance with the
1160:All numbering based on
1501:request review at the
1233:to a particular view.
1184:advocacy or propaganda
855:This request involves
731:This request involves
937:Preliminary decisions
727:Statement by Kkmurray
722:Statements by parties
443:Track related changes
303:Arbitration Committee
816:Statement by Nick Y.
757:mass-to-charge ratio
252:Enforcement requests
180:Guide to arbitration
109:Drafting arbitrators
1412:Kehrli topic banned
1244:Scientific notation
836:Statement by Kehrli
1645:a discussion at AE
1211:dispute resolution
1162:/Proposed decision
769:Talk:Kendrick mass
546:/Proposed decision
274:Contentious topics
172:Arbitration policy
1607:
1606:
1505:("AE") or at the
1408:
1205:Editorial process
1192:original research
1148:
849:
525:
479:
478:
446:
414:
284:General sanctions
232:All open requests
162:About arbitration
137:
136:
132:
121:
107:
96:
80:
72:Proposed decision
69:
58:
47:
1686:
1531:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1471:
1404:
1341:
1314:deleted contribs
1287:Locus of dispute
1282:Findings of fact
1269:original thought
1250:reliable sources
1147:
1145:
1114:
1054:
1022:
848:
846:
717:
690:deleted contribs
669:
642:deleted contribs
617:
590:deleted contribs
567:Involved parties
524:
523:
496:
471:
464:
457:
445:
440:
433:
412:
368:Clerk procedures
360:
318:
289:Editor sanctions
266:Active sanctions
224:Open proceedings
194:
153:
139:
126:
115:
101:
90:
74:
63:
52:
41:
34:
33:
1694:
1693:
1689:
1688:
1687:
1685:
1684:
1683:
1669:
1668:
1649:Editor notified
1624:
1608:
1564:Important notes
1523:
1521:
1476:
1468:
1448:
1443:
1414:
1402:
1373:
1299:
1289:
1284:
1265:
1246:
1226:
1207:
1176:
1171:
1157:
1141:
1137:
1110:
1052:John Vandenberg
1050:
1020:
944:
939:
873:Kendrick (unit)
842:
838:
818:
803:article to the
801:Kendrick (unit)
749:Kendrick (unit)
729:
724:
675:
627:
575:
569:
526:
499:
497:
493:
486:
475:
441:
435:
434:
429:
419:
418:
417:
406:
389:
379:
378:
377:
364:
356:
344:
319:
314:
305:
295:
294:
293:
268:
258:
257:
256:
226:
216:
213:
198:
190:
168:
30:
29:
28:
12:
11:
5:
1692:
1690:
1682:
1681:
1671:
1670:
1666:
1664:
1663:
1623:
1620:
1619:
1618:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1598:
1594:
1590:
1587:
1586:
1585:
1584:
1581:
1578:
1572:
1571:
1550:
1549:
1546:
1539:
1538:
1534:
1533:
1510:
1499:
1491:
1490:
1478:
1477:
1474:
1469:
1467:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1447:
1444:
1442:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1413:
1410:
1401:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1372:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1288:
1285:
1283:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1264:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1245:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1225:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1206:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1180:other purposes
1175:
1172:
1170:
1167:
1156:
1155:Final decision
1153:
1136:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1119:
1104:
1087:
1075:
1058:
1044:
1027:
1012:
1000:
983:
963:
943:
940:
938:
935:
837:
834:
817:
814:
761:Thomson (unit)
728:
725:
723:
720:
719:
718:
670:
622:
568:
565:
495:
488:
487:
481:
477:
476:
474:
473:
466:
459:
451:
448:
447:
437:
436:
427:
425:
424:
421:
420:
416:
415:
407:
402:
397:
391:
390:
385:
384:
381:
380:
376:
375:
370:
365:
355:
350:
345:
340:
335:
330:
325:
320:
313:
307:
306:
301:
300:
297:
296:
292:
291:
286:
281:
270:
269:
264:
263:
260:
259:
255:
254:
249:
244:
239:
234:
228:
227:
222:
221:
218:
217:
215:
214:
209:
204:
199:
189:
182:
177:
169:
164:
158:
155:
154:
146:
145:
135:
134:
99:NuclearWarfare
39:Main case page
31:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1691:
1680:
1677:
1676:
1674:
1667:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1642:
1639:
1636:
1632:
1629:
1628:
1627:
1621:
1617:
1615:
1610:
1609:
1599:
1595:
1589:
1588:
1582:
1579:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1569:
1568:
1567:
1565:
1561:
1557:
1553:
1547:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1536:
1535:
1530:wikimedia.org
1519:
1515:
1511:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1488:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1480:
1479:
1473:
1472:
1465:
1461:
1459:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1445:
1440:
1436:
1433:
1432:
1431:
1429:
1426:
1423:
1419:
1411:
1409:
1407:
1399:
1395:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1388:
1385:
1382:
1378:
1370:
1366:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1359:
1355:
1352:
1349:
1345:
1339:
1336:
1333:
1330:
1327:
1324:
1321:
1318:
1315:
1312:
1309:
1306:
1303:
1298:
1294:
1293:Kendrick mass
1286:
1281:
1277:
1274:
1273:
1272:
1270:
1262:
1258:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1251:
1243:
1239:
1236:
1235:
1234:
1232:
1223:
1219:
1216:
1215:
1214:
1212:
1204:
1200:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1193:
1189:
1185:
1181:
1173:
1168:
1166:
1165:
1163:
1154:
1152:
1151:
1146:
1144:
1134:
1130:
1127:
1126:Mailer Diablo
1123:
1120:
1118:
1115:
1113:
1108:
1105:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1088:
1086:
1083:
1079:
1076:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1059:
1057:
1053:
1048:
1045:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1028:
1026:
1023:
1017:
1013:
1011:
1008:
1004:
1001:
999:
995:
991:
987:
984:
982:
978:
975:
972:
968:
964:
962:
958:
954:
950:
946:
945:
936:
934:
932:
927:
925:
919:
917:
914:
909:
907:
901:
897:
895:
889:
886:
882:
876:
874:
870:
869:Kendrick mass
866:
862:
858:
853:
852:
847:
845:
835:
833:
832:
828:
824:
815:
813:
809:
806:
805:Kendrick mass
802:
796:
793:
789:
783:
781:
779:
776:
773:
770:
766:
765:mass spectrum
762:
758:
754:
750:
746:
745:Kendrick mass
742:
738:
734:
726:
721:
715:
712:
709:
706:
703:
700:
697:
694:
691:
688:
685:
682:
679:
674:
671:
667:
664:
661:
658:
655:
652:
649:
646:
643:
640:
637:
634:
631:
626:
623:
621:
615:
612:
609:
606:
603:
600:
597:
594:
591:
588:
585:
582:
579:
574:
571:
570:
566:
564:
562:
558:
554:
549:
547:
543:
538:
536:
532:
522:
521:
516:
515:
510:
509:
504:
503:
494:
491:
484:
472:
467:
465:
460:
458:
453:
452:
450:
449:
444:
439:
438:
423:
422:
411:
408:
405:
401:
398:
396:
393:
392:
388:
383:
382:
374:
371:
369:
366:
363:
359:
354:
351:
349:
346:
343:
339:
336:
334:
331:
329:
326:
324:
321:
317:
312:
309:
308:
304:
299:
298:
290:
287:
285:
282:
279:
275:
272:
271:
267:
262:
261:
253:
250:
248:
245:
243:
240:
238:
237:Case requests
235:
233:
230:
229:
225:
220:
219:
212:
208:
205:
203:
200:
197:
193:
188:
186:
183:
181:
178:
176:
173:
170:
167:
163:
160:
159:
157:
156:
152:
148:
147:
144:
140:
133:
130:
125:
119:
114:
110:
105:
100:
94:
89:
85:
81:
78:
73:
67:
62:
56:
51:
45:
40:
36:
35:
27:
23:
19:
1665:
1637:
1625:
1611:
1563:
1562:
1558:
1554:
1551:
1540:
1492:
1482:
1481:
1455:
1449:
1434:
1424:
1415:
1405:
1403:
1393:
1383:
1374:
1364:
1350:
1334:
1328:
1322:
1316:
1310:
1304:
1290:
1275:
1266:
1256:
1247:
1237:
1231:undue weight
1227:
1217:
1208:
1198:
1177:
1159:
1158:
1142:
1138:
1121:
1111:
1106:
1089:
1077:
1060:
1046:
1029:
1015:
1014:Tentatively
1002:
985:
973:
948:
928:
920:
910:
902:
898:
890:
877:
865:User:Kmurray
854:
843:
839:
819:
810:
797:
784:
730:
710:
704:
698:
692:
686:
680:
662:
656:
650:
644:
638:
632:
620:filing party
619:
610:
604:
598:
592:
586:
580:
550:
539:
527:
519:
513:
507:
501:
489:
482:
480:
108:
83:
82:
38:
37:
1509:("AN"); and
1441:Enforcement
1034:Newyorkbrad
741:User:Kehrli
490:Case Closed
483:Case Opened
207:Ban appeals
185:Noticeboard
113:David Fuchs
84:Case clerks
1653:EdJohnston
1484:Committee.
1332:block user
1326:filter log
1182:, such as
1169:Principles
990:PhilKnight
708:block user
702:filter log
660:block user
654:filter log
608:block user
602:filter log
413:(pre-2016)
400:Statistics
333:Procedures
1522:arbcom-en
1338:block log
953:SirFozzie
894:metrology
881:WP:SOURCE
861:WP:WEIGHT
857:WP:SOURCE
788:WP:SOURCE
737:WP:WEIGHT
733:WP:SOURCE
714:block log
666:block log
614:block log
542:/Workshop
537:subpage.
535:/Evidence
338:Elections
1673:Category
1641:contribs
1428:contribs
1400:Remedies
1387:contribs
1354:contribs
1308:contribs
1297:Kkmurray
1224:Advocacy
1094:Jclemens
977:contribs
967:Casliber
684:contribs
636:contribs
584:contribs
573:Kkmurray
61:Workshop
50:Evidence
24: |
22:Requests
20: |
885:WP:NPOV
823:Nick Y.
792:WP:NPOV
625:Nick Y.
410:Reports
348:History
328:Members
323:Contact
311:Discuss
175:(CU/OS)
1631:Kehrli
1514:"ARCA"
1418:Kehrli
1377:Kehrli
1371:Kehrli
1358:jargon
1344:Kehrli
1122:Accept
1107:Accept
1090:Accept
1078:Accept
1065:Risker
1061:Accept
1047:Accept
1030:Accept
1016:Accept
1007:Kirill
1003:Accept
986:Accept
949:Accept
924:Kirill
912:sense
673:Kehrli
353:Clerks
211:Report
122:&
97:&
1416:1.2)
1112:Roger
1082:Shell
387:Audit
16:<
1657:talk
1635:talk
1422:talk
1381:talk
1348:talk
1320:logs
1302:talk
1124:. -
1098:talk
1069:talk
1038:talk
994:talk
971:talk
957:talk
883:and
871:and
827:talk
790:and
763:and
747:and
696:logs
678:talk
648:logs
630:talk
596:logs
578:talk
404:Talk
395:Talk
362:Talk
342:Talk
196:Talk
166:Talk
129:Talk
118:Talk
104:Talk
93:Talk
77:Talk
66:Talk
55:Talk
44:Talk
26:Case
1375:2)
1143:AGK
1063:.
933:).
896:.
875:.
867:at
844:AGK
743:at
278:Log
88:AGK
1675::
1659:)
1651:.
1566::
1532:).
1360:.
1186:,
1100:)
1092:.
1080:.
1071:)
1049:.
1040:)
1005:.
996:)
988:.
979:)
959:)
859:,
829:)
759:,
735:,
618:,
563:.
548:.
517:,
511:,
505:,
111::
86::
70:—
59:—
48:—
1655:(
1638:·
1633:(
1425:·
1420:(
1384:·
1379:(
1351:·
1346:(
1340:)
1335:·
1329:·
1323:·
1317:·
1311:·
1305:·
1300:(
1096:(
1067:(
1036:(
992:(
974:·
969:(
955:(
825:(
716:)
711:·
705:·
699:·
693:·
687:·
681:·
676:(
668:)
663:·
657:·
651:·
645:·
639:·
633:·
628:(
616:)
611:·
605:·
599:·
593:·
587:·
581:·
576:(
520:4
514:3
508:2
502:1
470:e
463:t
456:v
358:+
316:+
280:)
276:(
192:+
131:)
127:(
120:)
116:(
106:)
102:(
95:)
91:(
79:)
75:(
68:)
64:(
57:)
53:(
46:)
42:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
