97:
being considered. To ensure the integrity of selection, details of the process of selection, the exact nature of any criteria, and any factors taken into account during the decision, are as a norm non-public – it is felt that the users who are able to do the task will be able to make that assessment personally, for and of themselves. Given the caliber of the existing shortlisted users we are aware of, already under consideration, we will not be considering users other than seasoned and experienced administrators.
126:
for forwarding to the
Committee, no later than midnight Thursday July 2 (UTC) (7 days). At such time as we are ready to make actual appointments, the community will be advised, and opportunity will be provided to submit comments and impressions of a factual, salient nature which users are expected to
100:
We are not anticipating a flood of new nominations, but those users who genuinely may feel they meet likely criteria may wish to email the committee's designated contact (see below), to have their names considered. No statement or details are needed; we are simply identifying names at this time, to
83:
Whilst we have a list drawn from past inquiries by users, and our own existing discussions, there are already a few more credible, seasoned names than appointments (around 10), and further names of comparable credibility that meet the appropriate standard will be considered completely on a par. The
96:
Checkuser is our most important appointment, and the
Committee's considerations are searching, stringent and wide ranging. Checkuser may not be obtained by demand, by wiki-process, or by popular vote; it may be obtained only by discussion and invitation of the Committee, at a time appointments are
92:
The
Arbitration Committee is considering appointing new checkusers in the near future. Any user who is interested in being considered for the shortlist please email us. Please do not suggest others (although you may wish to make them aware), and please do not advertise nominations on the wiki. At
79:
To underpin this, as
Arbitration Committee standing policy, we do not discuss who was considered, or reasons why one was appointed rather than another. In many cases it is a matter of sifting highly trusted people against each other, and such comparison as a public or private wikidrama would
101:
discuss internally; a brief note will be fine. You will also need to be over 18 and also of adult age in the country you reside (or imminently so), be an active administrator in good standing on
English Knowledge (XXG), and be willing to
114:
Process: Please send an email containing (just) your wiki account name, confirmation of interest, and confirmation that you meet the
Wikimedia Foundation criteria and will be willing to identify if appointed, to ex-Arbitrator
70:, Checkuser appointments are the user(s) we feel most likely to be best for the flag. There is no "queue" and no "getting there early", and there is no "precedence" or "preferred users". It is purely done on the basis of
31:
21:
163:
45:
Granting of checkuser access is the single most serious appointment within the
Arbitration Committee's remit, and process and critieria are stringent.
146:
102:
17:
127:
be prepared to discuss thoughtfully with
Arbitrators if necessary. Interested users are requested to submit their names by email
121:
56:
is an access right given only by appointment of the
Arbitration Committee, and never lightly. it is subject to
57:
117:
63:, and is given at times when it is deemed appropriate, not on request, and not by solicitation.
53:
39:
80:
manifestly be unfair to very exceptional members of the community not appointed at that time.
93:
this time we are simply checking for any significant omissions on our existing shortlist.
35:
60:
157:
72:
143:
84:
strongest candidates from the resulting list will be taken further.
105:for legal purposes to the Wikimedia Foundation.
151:For and on behalf of the Arbitration Committee
164:Knowledge (XXG) Arbitration Committee archives
88:Application to be considered for the Shortlist
8:
109:
131:in order to avoid querulous wikidrama.
76:and intense discussion at the time.
42:appointments are likely to be made.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration Committee
7:
28:
1:
66:It should be clarified that
180:
103:formally identify yourself
147:14:28, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
22:June 2008 announcements
36:Arbitration Committee
58:Wikimedia Foundation
136:
135:
32:June announcement
171:
110:
179:
178:
174:
173:
172:
170:
169:
168:
154:
153:
90:
51:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
177:
175:
167:
166:
156:
155:
138:
137:
134:
133:
89:
86:
61:privacy policy
50:
47:
38:, a number of
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
176:
165:
162:
161:
159:
152:
149:
148:
145:
141:
132:
130:
125:
123:
119:
118:Theresa knott
112:
111:
108:
107:
106:
104:
98:
94:
87:
85:
81:
77:
75:
74:
69:
64:
62:
59:
55:
48:
46:
43:
41:
37:
33:
23:
19:
150:
142:
139:
128:
116:
113:
99:
95:
91:
82:
78:
71:
67:
65:
52:
44:
30:Following a
29:
140:Thank you.
68:at any time
73:ab initio
54:CheckUser
40:Checkuser
158:Category
49:Preamble
20: |
34:by the
122:email
16:<
129:only
144:FT2
160::
124:)
120:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.