364:
590:
141:
429:
318:. Different editors edit at different speeds, and groups of editors for different subjects form topic sub-communities that may have different standards of editing speed from one another. There is no objective standard for editing speed that applies to all such sub-communities. One should not always expect another editor to spend the large amount of time to go through each step and examine each edit summary.
599:
284:
271:. The most simple way to form a daughter article and reduce the length in the parent article is to create a daughter article by copying the entire section to the daughter article, and retaining only the section lead in the parent article. The most simple way is not necessarily the best way. If a parent/daughter relationship is created, place a
42:
206:
126:
403:
When good illustrative examples of a general concept are added step by step, the end product may defeat the purpose of examples. The list may be so long that a reader does not want to read it. It may be so long that the general concept being illustrated may be lost in the specificity or sheer volume.
296:
A line by line process for additions from different editors may creep into stylistic problems. The result may appear to be a disorganized and incoherent pile, perhaps not even about a single unifying subject matter, when it actually is. The article may appear to be a committee product, rather than an
209:
People can become aclimated to a hot tub as it gradually warms, but a newcomer might stick their toe in and find it to be too hot. Editors who have been close to the step-by-step editing of an article might not notice that the article has crept up to an undesirable state. An outside editor might come
291:
argument states that a relatively small first step leads to a chain of related events culminating in some significant effect. - As bricks are added, this will eventually become a pile. At what point does it become a pile? At what point has article creep resulted in an ineloquent article, or one that
214:
Creep can lead to a loss of perspective. It may be hard to notice creep when a group of editors have been closely monitoring each step. An editor who has made substantial contributions to a page may come back to an article after a leave of absence and see a huge change in tone, point of view, style,
653:
A paradox arises in application of this essay. The above list of examples from outside of
Knowledge is illustrative of the creep concept. Each addition of a different type of example illustrates the general creep concept in a different way. But by creeping up to being too long, it should be trimmed
637:
Article creep is not necessarily bad as an intermediate step an article goes through. Sometimes it is good to put in too much information, in order to help see everything at once to make a better informed decision as to overall layout and structure, or to compare what to keep and what to trim. Once
313:
An editor might make a series of deletions, each well reasoned in the edit summaries. If this is done too quickly on an article that has been relatively stable for a long time, other editors might have time to only look at the total effect of all the edits, not check each step by step edit summary,
419:
A meta-example of creep is the following list, which may grow so long, step by step, that no one bothers to read it, or the clarification provided by examples is lost in their sheer volume. Since this essay is in user space, editors may think of examples that are better than those below, add their
240:
emphasis on one perspective. Editors may want to rebalance to achieve NPOV by adding more content from other perspectives, or by trimming some of the new edits solely on the basis of creep to POV, even though they would otherwise be very good edits. In the latter case, the trimming should first be
625:
reason to delete a new edit by another editor. This might unnecessarily discourage them from participating in the article, and some of their coming edits may make this edit better than others already in the article when viewed cumulatively. New information is constantly arising, and
420:
idea, and not want to delete another editor's edit. So the list below should be periodically assessed so that only the most illustrative examples are kept, so it does not become too long. As the following list gets added to by other editors, it may creep up to being very long.
350:, an editor should create a separate section for each edit that has a different rationale in the edit summary. This may then create talk page creep. An editor should not expect quick responses to all of the new talk page sections, and should have patience as each is addressed.
387:, it is an encyclopedia. Lists may make an article look like it does not belong in an encyclopedia through list creep. When an article subject has a large fan base, lists can be added so as to make the article not be encyclopedic in form, as in early versions of the
215:
and readability. This editor may have a perspective that enables them to see unwanted creep from a global perspective that is no longer easily seen by the editors who examined the edits in a step-by-step manner. That editor is like a newcomer to a
147:
An editor should look at an article globally, not just line by line. A folk tale is that if you drop a frog in boiling water, it will jump out and live; but if you drop it in cold water and let the temperature creep up bit by bit, it will
326:
with examples of the reverted editor's edits elsewhere. The reverted editor may have made each edit in good faith and with good edit summaries, no matter what their history elsewhere, and which may or may not have resulted in creep.
394:
Images in an article may appear like a list at the right of an article. Good images that are very illustrative may be added one-by-one until they create a list of images at the right, which may be an unencyclopedic in appearance.
189:
uphill with each step, then get to the top and notice a nearby peak has a much better view. It might have been better to not take the straight uphill steps, but to maybe take some steps so as to go around or even sometimes down.
321:
Conversely, the reverting editor should not accuse vandalism, bad faith, POV, or use expressions like “butchery” or “gutting an article”, but should participate in talk page discussions with patience, and never argue
194:
634:
that allows the temperature to get warmer than where it was set before shutting the heater off, then allows the temperature to get cooler than where it is set before turning the heater back on.
607:
Repeatedly creeping up to a larger article and then down to a smaller article is a natural process of article development. Adjusting for article creep is analogous to the function of a
630:. An article should be reevaluated for creep after a significant number of edits, and then be trimmed back after creep has led to a problem. The situation is analogous to a heater's
534:
and get in once it is warm enough, after which it continues to heat up. A new person may come along, see the group relaxing, stick their toe in the water, and recoil as if burned.
159:
occurs when a series of reasonable step-by-step edits are made, but the end product is undesirable. An editor should look at a page globally, not just in a step-by-step manner.
134:
A series of reasonable step by step edits, each with consensus, can create a final article that is not what was intended, and there may not be consensus as to the final product.
638:
creep has occurred, determining what to trim should be discussed on the talk pages to get consensus as to how best to trim materials that may be good, but cause creep.
372:
465:
is the commercial phenomenon in which merchants and retailers exploit the commercialized status of
Christmas by moving up the start of the holiday shopping season.
645:
when a hard work producing a large number of edits is deleted in an adjustment for article creep, and they feel like they are being made to start all over again.
28:
166:, an article will gradually swing toward that POV. Then it will swing back as more edits are made. So an editor should not go in and delete material claiming
388:
627:
455:
is the expansion of a project or mission beyond its original goal. A military operation may experience mission creep and find itself bogged down in a
193:
Sometimes "article creep" can also refer to an unintended proliferation of articles at
Knowledge, not just proliferation inside articles, such as in
305:
Sentences clearly based on a reliable source can be slightly adjusted again and again, until ultimately they are no longer supported by the source.
363:
384:
219:, where those in it may have gradually acclimated to the temperature as it gradually warmed, but it may be too hot for a newcomer to get in.
611:. It may be a good idea to discuss at the talk page before deletions are made. Otherwise an editor my feel like they are in the Myth of
336:
171:
641:
It may be a good idea to discuss at the talk page before deletions are made. Otherwise an editor my feel like they are in the Myth of
57:
It contains the advice or opinions of one or more
Knowledge contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of
58:
297:
eloquent exposition. Organization into more sections may help. Rewording by a single editor or smaller group of editors may help.
671:
662:
applies to resolve this paradox as it is applied to this essay, even with distinguishing examples from meta-examples.
268:
264:
258:
686:
654:
per this essay. In that case it will no longer serve as an illustrative example of list creep. Neither the essay
343:; instead of copying talk page discussions or blocks from another document, use links to them with a summary.
447:
over what to delete or not. It is best to get out of the quagmire with a patient discussion at the talk page.
538:
380:
346:
If a revert for resulting from deletion creep occurs, instead of undoing the revert, which might lead to an
163:
468:
In medicine, a number of small lifestyle decisions may over time add up to a major health problem, such as
340:
267:. When an article section creeps up to being excessively large, subsections can be created, or an entire
505:
376:
572:
477:
315:
265:
Knowledge articles tend to grow in a way which lends itself to the natural creation of new articles
246:
242:
62:
615:
when a hard work producing a large number of edits is deleted in an adjustment for article creep.
347:
72:
16:
This essay is about creep in articles and talk pages. For creep in policies and guidelines, see
195:
a discussion about creating a separate article for each contestant in a reality television show
140:
494:
may be imported and go wild, and the numbers creep up until they harm the ecosystem, as with
642:
612:
589:
568:
491:
174:, and either have patience, or add in more information from the POV they think is lacking.
50:
655:
485:
462:
237:
232:
Editors may try to balance content when there are two perspectives, in order to achieve a
167:
17:
553:
288:
233:
182:
24:
541:
is when relatively small steps lead to a chain culminating in some significant effect.
428:
680:
659:
549:
481:
473:
452:
436:
272:
178:
65:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.
444:
236:(NPOV). A series of very good edits may all be from one perspective, and result in
162:
Article creep is a natural process. When editing from a group of sources with one
598:
210:
to an article with a perspective that editors close to the article cannot have.
631:
608:
516:
501:
409:
323:
275:
at the top of the article section and new article in the appropriate manner.
575:, in order to account for planetary motions against the background of stars.
564:
548:, a step by step analysis known as differentiation may lead to finding a
545:
509:
469:
456:
440:
580:
Discuss article creep on the talk page: Thermostat and
Sisyphus analogy
563:
additions may be made to retain a theory, such as excessively complex
531:
520:
283:
216:
560:
170:
weight is being given to one POV. Instead they should recognize that
314:
and revert all the edits a single stroke. It may even appear to be
205:
524:
495:
427:
362:
371:
A reasonable list in an article may creep up to make the article
120:
36:
424:
Examples of the "creep" concept from outside of
Knowledge
367:
List creep may make an article look like the Yellow Pages
335:
Talk page creep to unnecessary length can be avoided by
108:
101:
94:
87:
80:
27:" redirects here. For the WikiProject on frogs, see
439:, a military operation may get bogged down into a
559:In the philosophy of science, a large series of
185:. When climbing to get a good view, one may go
504:may start off as a good hobby, but lead to an
29:Knowledge:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles
8:
519:creep may lead to something good such as a
263:Article creep is not necessarily bad, since
621:One should not claim article creep as the
282:
204:
139:
523:style, or not, when something becomes
241:discussed at the talk page to achieve
480:, but if not dealt early may require
443:. Don't let article creep lead to an
433:Has an article crept into a quagmire?
7:
488:, and the same is true at Knowledge.
389:Knowledge peer review of the X-Files
177:Creep is analogous to the idea of a
658:nor the article guideline on being
649:The Knowledge article creep paradox
301:Creep to sources no longer applying
63:thoroughly vetted by the community
59:Knowledge's policies or guidelines
14:
476:, which is best dealt with using
672:Knowledge:Arbitrating_on_content
597:
588:
530:A group of people may turn on a
124:
40:
628:Knowledge is a work in progress
404:Conversely, a list of examples
383:, degenerate into a directory.
245:, in order to maintain a good
1:
292:is not encyclopedic in style?
385:Knowledge is not a directory
279:Creep to a disorganized pile
172:WP:Knowledge is not finished
703:
256:
201:Loss of global perspective
70:
34:Essay on editing Knowledge
22:
15:
571:instead of changing to a
359:Unencyclopedic list creep
253:Creep to excessive length
145:"Getting into hot water."
373:look like a yellow pages
132:This page in a nutshell:
539:slippery slope argument
152:jump out, and will die.
448:
368:
293:
211:
153:
431:
366:
286:
234:neutral point of view
208:
143:
61:, as it has not been
506:obsessive compulsive
379:on a list can, by a
259:WP:Splitting article
573:heliocentric system
478:preventive medicine
508:disorder known as
449:
399:Example list creep
369:
294:
212:
154:
537:In philosophy, a
138:
137:
119:
118:
694:
687:Knowledge essays
601:
592:
569:Ptolemaic system
492:Invasive species
269:daughter article
128:
127:
121:
111:
104:
97:
90:
83:
44:
43:
37:
702:
701:
697:
696:
695:
693:
692:
691:
677:
676:
668:
651:
619:
618:
617:
616:
604:
603:
602:
594:
593:
582:
486:palliative care
463:Christmas creep
434:
426:
401:
361:
356:
333:
331:Talk page creep
311:
303:
281:
261:
255:
230:
225:
203:
146:
125:
115:
114:
107:
100:
93:
86:
79:
75:
67:
66:
41:
35:
32:
21:
12:
11:
5:
700:
698:
690:
689:
679:
678:
675:
674:
667:
664:
650:
647:
606:
605:
596:
595:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
581:
578:
577:
576:
567:to retain the
557:
554:global maximum
542:
535:
528:
513:
499:
489:
466:
460:
432:
425:
422:
400:
397:
381:slippery slope
360:
357:
355:
352:
332:
329:
310:
309:Deletion creep
307:
302:
299:
289:slippery slope
280:
277:
254:
251:
229:
226:
224:
221:
202:
199:
183:global maximum
144:
136:
135:
129:
117:
116:
113:
112:
105:
98:
91:
84:
76:
71:
68:
56:
55:
47:
45:
33:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
699:
688:
685:
684:
682:
673:
670:
669:
665:
663:
661:
657:
648:
646:
644:
639:
635:
633:
629:
624:
614:
610:
600:
591:
579:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
555:
552:instead of a
551:
550:local maximum
547:
543:
540:
536:
533:
529:
526:
522:
518:
514:
511:
507:
503:
500:
497:
493:
490:
487:
483:
482:major surgery
479:
475:
474:heart disease
471:
467:
464:
461:
458:
454:
453:Mission creep
451:
450:
446:
442:
438:
437:mission creep
430:
423:
421:
417:
415:
411:
407:
398:
396:
392:
390:
386:
382:
378:
375:. Reasonable
374:
365:
358:
353:
351:
349:
344:
342:
338:
330:
328:
325:
319:
317:
308:
306:
300:
298:
290:
285:
278:
276:
274:
270:
266:
260:
252:
250:
248:
244:
239:
235:
227:
222:
220:
218:
207:
200:
198:
196:
191:
188:
184:
180:
179:local maximum
175:
173:
169:
165:
160:
158:
157:Article creep
151:
142:
133:
130:
123:
122:
110:
106:
103:
102:WP:Thermostat
99:
96:
92:
89:
85:
82:
78:
77:
74:
69:
64:
60:
54:
52:
46:
39:
38:
30:
26:
19:
652:
640:
636:
622:
620:
484:followed by
418:
413:
405:
402:
393:
370:
345:
341:transclusion
334:
320:
316:WP:vandalism
312:
304:
295:
262:
231:
228:Creep to POV
213:
192:
186:
176:
161:
156:
155:
149:
131:
48:
257:Main page:
49:This is an
632:thermostat
609:thermostat
517:aesthetics
502:Collecting
410:exhaustive
354:List creep
324:ad hominem
565:epicycles
247:community
243:consensus
164:viewpoint
88:WP:Creepa
81:WP:ACREEP
73:Shortcuts
681:Category
666:See also
656:WP:CREEP
643:Sisyphus
613:Sisyphus
546:calculus
510:hoarding
470:diabetes
457:quagmire
445:edit war
441:quagmire
406:intended
377:notables
348:edit war
223:Examples
187:straight
18:WP:CREEP
660:concise
532:hot tub
521:baroque
416:creep.
337:linking
217:hot tub
109:WP:Pile
95:WP:FROG
25:WP:FROG
561:ad hoc
408:to be
339:using
181:vs. a
525:gaudy
496:kudzu
238:undue
168:undue
51:essay
623:only
544:In
515:In
472:or
435:In
414:not
412:is
391:.
273:hat
150:not
683::
287:A
249:.
197:.
556:.
527:.
512:.
498:.
459:.
53:.
31:.
23:"
20:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
