674:
606:
itself is notable (do all albums and songs of a notable band need to be notable to have pages about them?) but it contains a notable song - enter the ninja which was/is an internet viral phenomena. 3) What notability 'issues'? 4) No evidence that the band is notable? Clearly the requester has not bothered to even read the band's page.
631:
article was quite well sourced before the AfD, and the $ O$ article was pretty much your standard infobox + tracklisting deal. The fact that the article is better now as a result of the AfD is a good thing, undoubtedly, but I share the opinion that the AfD itself really shouldn't have been raised -
605:
have notability issues. There's no evidence that even the band is notable" is completely false, and hence the logic for the deletion request is nonexistent. 1) The page has sources (I don't know if they were added before or fter the AfD request.) 2) I personally don't know if I would say the album
162:
601:
I have no opinion on whether or not the album deserves a page of it's own, however, the underlying reason for the AfD request "No sources, no evidence of notability and even the band
300:
117:
527:
The
Cherrytree/Interscope $ 0$ is a reworked version of the same album that was originally available on Die Antwoord's website earlier this year. Check out the tracklist below.
633:
156:
273:, an article about a musical recording that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant is eligible for speedy deletion under criterion A9.' (
492:, Billboard talks about a 17-track version being streamed and a 23-track version being released. There's no source for the singles and so the question of
261:: A9 is intended to be used in the case where 'An article about a musical recording that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant
122:
17:
338:
380:
177:
430:
not a problem - added an initial boingboing reference, and shall assert notability further in the next day or so. --
271:
If the artist associated with the work does not have an article, or if the artist's article has already been deleted
144:
701:
500:
sourced from? considering that the introduction serves as the body of the article, everything needs a source. --
36:
700:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
370:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
90:
85:
526:
94:
637:
138:
569:
510:
419:
244:
207:
77:
364:
644:
feel that this probably won't make an article, but would probably make an excellent section here. --
134:
682:
611:
384:
170:
627:
Thank you for what I can only call an injection of sanity into the discussion, Centerone :) - the
388:
336:
409:
If notability exists, expand the article and I will gladly review and retract my nomination. --
368:
184:
589:
475:
378:
376:
374:
311:
274:
223:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
686:
653:
615:
593:
573:
565:
556:
540:
516:
502:
478:
457:
439:
425:
411:
400:
366:
343:
326:
315:
286:
249:
231:
213:
199:
59:
521:
The tracklisting thing had me a little confused as well until i saw this pitchfork article:
649:
536:
453:
435:
396:
356:
282:
678:
607:
55:
331:
266:
227:
150:
670:
628:
602:
585:
472:
307:
194:
111:
666:
645:
532:
449:
445:
431:
392:
360:
278:
197:
have notability issues. There's no evidence that even the band is notable. --
50:
81:
559:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
363:
was another site instrumental to them blowing up) - see pitchfork:
694:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
73:
65:
277:, again emphasis added by me). Definitely not the case here. --
636:. (addendum) I notice that a page was created today for
193:
No sources, no evidence of notability and even the band
107:
103:
99:
169:
301:
list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions
564:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
226:. Likely also candidate for speedy deletion under
498:A worldwide release in physical format is planned.
634:the other Die Antwoord AfD in progress at present
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
704:). No further edits should be made to this page.
383:. frankly mystified by the AfD on this and the
263:and where the artist's article does not exist
183:
8:
295:
299:: This debate has been included in the
471:for the same reasons listed by Kaini. -
496:coverage still arises. e.g. where is
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
687:05:43, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
654:00:13, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
616:23:00, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
594:13:15, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
574:00:00, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
541:01:37, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
517:00:33, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
479:09:55, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
458:01:04, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
440:00:11, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
426:00:02, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
401:23:58, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
387:, as this is a band signed to
359:and other fashionable places (
344:13:24, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
327:notability criteria for albums
316:23:40, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
287:18:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
250:22:20, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
214:21:47, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
60:03:12, 24 September 2010 (UTC)
1:
448:info, and the album cover --
391:, not a small indie label --
721:
222:- Does not appear to meet
697:Please do not modify it.
632:and the same applies to
32:Please do not modify it.
638:Enter the Ninja (song)
530:
355:amount of coverage in
351:- this band has had a
524:
269:, emphasis mine) or '
669:. And, as an aside:
389:Interscope Records
44:The result was
576:
325:as article fails
318:
304:
712:
699:
563:
561:
513:
509:
505:
422:
418:
414:
334:
305:
247:
241:
236:
210:
206:
202:
188:
187:
173:
125:
115:
97:
34:
720:
719:
715:
714:
713:
711:
710:
709:
708:
702:deletion review
695:
554:
511:
507:
503:
420:
416:
412:
373:and boingboing
357:Pitchfork Media
341:
332:
245:
237:
232:
208:
204:
200:
130:
121:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
718:
716:
707:
706:
690:
689:
659:
658:
657:
656:
619:
618:
596:
578:
577:
562:
551:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
544:
543:
522:
482:
481:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
442:
404:
403:
346:
339:
319:
292:
291:
290:
289:
253:
252:
191:
190:
127:
123:AfD statistics
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
717:
705:
703:
698:
692:
691:
688:
684:
680:
676:
673:not notable?
672:
668:
664:
661:
660:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
635:
630:
626:
623:
622:
621:
620:
617:
613:
609:
604:
600:
597:
595:
591:
587:
584:- see Kaini--
583:
580:
579:
575:
571:
567:
560:
558:
553:
552:
542:
538:
534:
529:
528:
523:
520:
519:
518:
515:
514:
506:
504:Lil_℧niquℇ №1
499:
495:
491:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
480:
477:
474:
470:
467:
466:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
441:
437:
433:
429:
428:
427:
424:
423:
415:
413:Lil_℧niquℇ №1
408:
407:
406:
405:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
379:
377:
375:
372:
369:
367:
365:
362:
358:
354:
350:
347:
345:
342:
337:
335:
330:
328:
324:
320:
317:
313:
309:
302:
298:
294:
293:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
257:
256:
255:
254:
251:
248:
242:
240:
235:
229:
225:
221:
218:
217:
216:
215:
212:
211:
203:
201:Lil_℧niquℇ №1
196:
186:
182:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
132:Find sources:
128:
124:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
696:
693:
671:Die Antwoord
662:
641:
629:Die Antwoord
624:
603:Die Antwoord
598:
581:
555:
525:
501:
497:
493:
489:
468:
410:
352:
348:
322:
321:
296:
270:
262:
258:
238:
233:
219:
198:
195:Die Antwoord
192:
180:
174:
166:
159:
153:
147:
141:
131:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
566:Ron Ritzman
494:significant
444:also, some
349:Strong Keep
157:free images
675:Seriously?
446:MetaCritic
385:related EP
361:BoingBoing
275:WP:NALBUMS
224:WP:NALBUMS
679:Arxiloxos
608:Centerone
308:• Gene93k
557:Relisted
340:Contribs
333:Armbrust
118:View log
625:Comment
599:Comment
586:Narayan
512:talk2me
490:Comment
473:zorblek
421:talk2me
259:Comment
209:talk2me
163:WPÂ refs
151:scholar
91:protect
86:history
476:(talk)
323:Delete
267:WP:CSD
239:mosler
220:Delete
135:Google
95:delete
667:Kaini
646:Kaini
533:Kaini
450:Kaini
432:Kaini
393:Kaini
279:Kaini
178:JSTOR
139:books
112:views
104:watch
100:links
74:$ O$
66:$ O$
48:. --
16:<
683:talk
665:per
663:Keep
650:talk
640:. I
612:talk
590:talk
582:Keep
570:talk
537:talk
469:Keep
454:talk
436:talk
397:talk
353:huge
312:talk
297:Note
283:talk
265:.' (
171:FENS
145:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
46:keep
381:etc
371:etc
306:--
185:TWL
120:•
116:– (
685:)
677:--
652:)
642:do
614:)
592:)
572:)
539:)
531:--
456:)
438:)
399:)
314:)
303:.
285:)
230:.
228:A9
165:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
681:(
648:(
610:(
588:(
568:(
535:(
508:|
452:(
434:(
417:|
395:(
329:.
310:(
281:(
246:â—Ź
243:|
234:R
205:|
189:)
181:·
175:·
167:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
137:(
129:(
126:)
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.