85:
295:- discussion in the last deletion debate showed that the information is verifiable, and that there should be more to say about the group, although unfortunately it's not yet in the article, probably because there are a lack of references on the web. I suspect that someone with access to the Portuguese press of the time could add much more. Notability standards for political parties are rather a grey area at present; if an
52:, brothers and sisters, their underlying point is well taken: for all we know, this could have been a committee consisting of one person. Not the faintest hint of notability, in other words, and the "keep" opinions do not address this. The slightly ridiculous name does not help either in establishing that this was a serious organisation (judged by the standards of such organisations, of course).
80:
112:
107:
116:
99:
188:
The previous AfD ended in no consensus, and I hate to say the Delete arguments in the last round were somewhat stronger than the Keep arguments. It is hard to verify notability in either
English or Portuguese. I wish more people would chime in here. Thanks! :)
394:
377:
357:
333:
308:
284:
256:
227:
198:
179:
161:
64:
103:
95:
70:
238:
209:
145:
86:
Articles for deletion/"Proletarian Union" Committee of the
Portuguese Marxist-Leninist Communist Organization (in reorganization) (2nd nomination)
81:
Articles for deletion/"Proletarian Union" Committee of the
Portuguese Marxist-Leninist Communist Organization (in reorganization)
17:
170:, as per arguments in previous afd. There are many issues to be resolved here, but deletion would not be beneficial. --
152:
Being
Portuguese, I was curious about this article. However, I was unable to confirm notability for this organization
412:
36:
411:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
373:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
96:"Proletarian Union" Committee of the Portuguese Marxist-Leninist Communist Organization (in reorganization)
71:"Proletarian Union" Committee of the Portuguese Marxist-Leninist Communist Organization (in reorganization)
390:
304:
279:
251:
222:
194:
157:
369:
386:
353:
296:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
300:
273:
245:
216:
329:
190:
175:
153:
55:
349:
133:
267:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
321:
317:
325:
171:
343:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
48:
While Monty Python witticisms are not really valid arguments for deletion
299:
for this is accepted, it will be easier to get consistency on this.
405:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
140:
129:
125:
121:
348:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
272:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
385:Where's the popular front then? He's over there.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
415:). No further edits should be made to this page.
239:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
210:list of Portugal-related deletion discussions
8:
237:: This debate has been included in the
208:: This debate has been included in the
78:
7:
77:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
316:No evidence of notability per
1:
432:
395:13:09, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
378:07:33, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
334:15:35, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
309:20:24, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
285:15:43, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
257:15:43, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
228:15:42, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
199:01:25, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
65:20:58, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
408:Please do not modify it.
358:01:24, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
180:04:33, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
162:01:43, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
76:AfDs for this article:
44:The result was
360:
297:upcoming proposal
287:
259:
242:
230:
213:
63:
423:
410:
347:
345:
320:. Barely passes
282:
276:
271:
269:
254:
248:
243:
233:
225:
219:
214:
204:
143:
137:
119:
62:
60:
53:
34:
431:
430:
426:
425:
424:
422:
421:
420:
419:
413:deletion review
406:
341:
280:
274:
265:
252:
246:
223:
217:
139:
110:
94:
91:
74:
56:
54:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
429:
427:
418:
417:
400:
398:
397:
380:
370:Colonel Warden
362:
361:
346:
338:
337:
336:
311:
289:
288:
270:
262:
261:
260:
231:
183:
182:
150:
149:
90:
89:
88:
83:
75:
73:
68:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
428:
416:
414:
409:
403:
402:
401:
396:
392:
388:
384:
381:
379:
375:
371:
367:
364:
363:
359:
355:
351:
344:
340:
339:
335:
331:
327:
324:, if at all.
323:
319:
315:
312:
310:
307:
306:
302:
298:
294:
291:
290:
286:
283:
277:
268:
264:
263:
258:
255:
249:
240:
236:
232:
229:
226:
220:
211:
207:
203:
202:
201:
200:
196:
192:
187:
181:
177:
173:
169:
166:
165:
164:
163:
159:
155:
147:
142:
135:
131:
127:
123:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
97:
93:
92:
87:
84:
82:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
407:
404:
399:
387:Nick mallory
382:
368:Splitters!.
365:
342:
313:
303:
292:
266:
234:
205:
185:
184:
167:
151:
57:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
301:Warofdreams
275:Fabrictramp
247:Fabrictramp
218:Fabrictramp
281:talk to me
253:talk to me
224:talk to me
191:Ecoleetage
154:Ecoleetage
58:Sandstein
146:View log
350:Locobot
314:Delete.
186:Comment
113:protect
108:history
46:delete.
383:Delete
366:Delete
141:delete
117:delete
50:per se
326:Nsk92
172:Soman
144:) – (
134:views
126:watch
122:links
16:<
391:talk
374:talk
354:talk
330:talk
322:WP:V
318:WP:N
305:talk
293:Keep
235:Note
206:Note
195:talk
176:talk
168:Keep
158:talk
130:logs
104:talk
100:edit
244:--
215:--
393:)
376:)
356:)
332:)
278:|
250:|
241:.
221:|
212:.
197:)
178:)
160:)
132:|
128:|
124:|
120:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
389:(
372:(
352:(
328:(
193:(
174:(
156:(
148:)
138:(
136:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.