Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/"Zitterbewegung and Cold Fusion" - Knowledge (XXG)

Source đź“ť

666:
Many cold fusion researchers and journalists believe that cold fusion will be explained by a theory proposed by some eminent theorist of an important research institute. For instance, the journalist Bob Wever says in his blog Strategy Kinetics:
72: 662:
Interestingly, somebody has deleted my book from the bibliograpy of the Knowledge (XXG) page on cold fusion (my book has been added to that page in July-2007, by the physicist Trever McFaddon).
99: 94: 103: 681:
So, there are theorists that hope to win the Nobel prize with a successful theory able to explain cold fusion. And of course that they don’t want my Quantum Ring Theory as an opponent.
86: 671:“Many believe that the work of MIT's Peter Hagelstein--a tenured professor of electrical engineering--is exemplary and if verified experimentally, stands in line for a Nobel prize.” 556: 126: 658:
I have noted that there is a s conspiracy against my Quantum Ring Theory among cold fusion researchers and journalists that divulge the cold fusion experiments.
736:
And we realize that Mitch is not quite sure anymore that cold fusion viability is impossible, after reading the explanation according to Quantum Ring Theory.
137:, but as I'm not a science expert or even that knowledgable, it would be beyond my ken. But as it stands, this is obviously an essay and violates 511:
Um, you got it all wrong. Knowledge (XXG) is meant as neither an arbiter nor a publisher of "facts." Our mission is to publish knowledge that is
743:
It is of interest to note that cold fusion researchers complain that there is a conspiracy of the academics against the cold fusion occurrence.
771:
How is this any different than the "America did WTC" nutjobs? Can we close this now before we get another blitzkrieg of irrelevant factoids?
367:
1) There is a belief, among the skeptics, that cold fusion is impossible to occur, because there is a unsurmountable theoretical question: “
707:“In conclusion, giving coverage to this fringe science only helps perpetuate the false belief that there exists any viability in cold fusion” 612:
Even the cold fusion theorists conspirate against QRT, as everybody can see in the link below the letter posted to Christy Frazier, entitled
173: 751:
But the own cold fusion theorists have a conspiracy against the QRT, which is the unique theory able to explain the cold fusion occurrence.
734:“I have not heard of Zitterbewegung energy before, and have been studying up on it before giving a formal response. Sorry for the delay”. 775: 567: 535: 499: 483: 475: 200: 188: 176: 158: 145: 56: 90: 17: 433:
4-2) the belief is wrong, because the question that supports their belief is answered by the electron’s zitterbewegung. This is a
293: 269: 82: 62: 790: 36: 651:
cc. Bob Wever, Steven Krivit, Nancy Kolenda, David Bradley, Naveen Dankal, Peter Jones, Jed Rothwell, Antonny Leggett
461: 449: 404: 392: 336: 253: 726:
So, Hagelstein’s theory or any other theory on cold fusion did not convince Mitch on the viability in cold fusion.
170: 691:
Actually it is funny why the people believe that Hagelstein’s theory is able to explain cold fusion occurrence,
789:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
523:
scientific theories. The prohibition against original work, like this article, is in place because such work
300:: that many experiments, made by several researchers, are performed in the laboratories worldwide. This is a 479: 320:
that cold fusion experiments are performed in the whole world, independently if cold fusion is real, or not.
730:
But after reading the response to his question posted by me according to Quantum Ring Theory, Mitch wrote:
471: 693:
since his theory is unable to explain even a single question like that arisen by the nuclear chemist Mitch
316:. Even if cold fusion is a fraud, it does not matter, because Knowledge (XXG) describes the following 452:
cannot be deleted from Knowledge (XXG). Because, as in the same case as happens with the articles on
133:
This is an essay and not an encyclopedia article. I'm fairly sure portions of this can be merged into
252:, since the cold fusion theorists cannot explain even that single theoretical question pointed out in 167: 387:, because actually the question is solved by considering the electron’s zitterbewegung. This is a 543:
original research, little notability. Seems to be created to promote this theory, in violation of
468:
that it’s wrong the belief of those ones who claim that cold fusion is theoretically impossible.
675: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
548: 532: 555:
has also appeared on Wikinews, despite the fact it is obviously not a news story. See also
544: 138: 516: 717: 618: 234:
with no viability, and so cold fusion cannot be described in the Knowledge (XXG) pages.
134: 520: 512: 561: 230:, because cold fusion is considered by the academicians till the present day as an 185: 49: 120: 772: 552: 496: 453: 325: 289: 244: 226: 155: 142: 197: 609:
You are not the only ones that conspirate against Quantum Ring Theory.
224:
1- From the Alksub's viewpoint, we have to delete all the articles on
758:
It’s only a new paradox in the history of the science’s development.
248:
page must be deleted, because everything written in there is only a
783:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
369:
The question then is, where will this additional mass come from?
258:
The question then is, where will this additional mass come from?
312:
C) So, cold fusion merits to be described in Knowledge (XXG),
419:
4) No matter if cold fusion occurrence is possible, or not.
676:
http://www.strategykinetics.com/2006/02/cold_fusion.html#more
557:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Quantum Ring Theory
531:
I just said. The counterexamples you mentioned don't.
273:
must be deleted, because everything written in there is
116: 112: 108: 73:
Articles for deletion/"Zitterbewegung and Cold Fusion"
718:
http://www.chemicalforums.com/index.php?topic=17140.0
619:
http://www.chemicalforums.com/index.php?topic=17140.0
345:
FACT: that there is a wrong belief among the skeptics
39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 306:B) Knowledge (XXG) is a place for description of 421:No matter if Quantum Ring Theory is wrong, or not 793:). No further edits should be made to this page. 411:. That it is wrong the belief of the skeptics. 141:. Prod removed by anon (most likely author). 343:. Because actually the article is showing a 8: 430:4-1) there is a belief among the skeptics. 456:, the important is the description of the 441:, it must be reported in Knowledge (XXG). 70: 635:CONSPIRACY AGAINST QUANTUM RING THEORY 614:CONSPIRACY AGAINST QUANTUM RING THEORY 383:2) But such a belief of the skeptics 328:are not deleted from Knowledge (XXG). 154:Essay advancing an original theory. -- 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 275:essays advancing an original theory 69: 437:. And therefore, because it is a 341:Essay advancing an original theory 219:Essay advancing an original theory 24: 647:Managing Editor, Infinite Energy 335:Now let me show that the article 314:no matter if it is viable, or not 294:Condensed matter nuclear science 270:Condensed matter nuclear science 83:"Zitterbewegung and Cold Fusion" 63:"Zitterbewegung and Cold Fusion" 288:A) All the articles concerning 462:Zitterbewegung and Cold Fusion 450:Zitterbewegung and Cold Fusion 405:Zitterbewegung and Cold Fusion 393:Zitterbewegung and Cold Fusion 337:Zitterbewegung and Cold Fusion 254:Zitterbewegung and Cold Fusion 1: 296:are describing the following 776:02:45, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 568:18:37, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 536:09:24, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 500:03:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 484:02:36, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 324:That’ s why the articles on 284:But consider the following: 201:04:08, 8 November 2007 (UTC) 189:09:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 177:07:57, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 159:06:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 146:05:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC) 57:03:07, 9 November 2007 (UTC) 695:in his blog Chemistry Forum 355:Actually it’s an important 810: 591:AND THE CONSPIRACY GOES ON 403:3) Therefore the article 391:, as shown in the article 250:theoretical original essay 553:extremely similar article 786:Please do not modify it. 361:that people need to know 208:RESPONSE BY W.GUGLINSKI: 32:Please do not modify it. 448:That’s why the article 68:AfDs for this article: 697:, where Mitch wrote: 644:To: Christy Frazier 519:, and this includes 460:. And the article 371:” This belief is a 764:WLADIMIR GUGLINSKI 265:Proposed mechanisms 606:Dear Wike members 427:is the following: 232:experimental essay 486: 474:comment added by 347:. And this is a 801: 788: 517:reliable sources 469: 124: 106: 54: 34: 809: 808: 804: 803: 802: 800: 799: 798: 797: 791:deletion review 784: 213:Let us analyse 97: 81: 78: 66: 50: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 807: 805: 796: 795: 779: 778: 756: 755: 754: 753: 739: 729: 725: 723: 722: 721: 720: 712: 711: 710: 709: 701: 700: 699: 698: 684: 680: 665: 661: 654: 650: 642: 641: 640: 639: 638: 637: 626: 623: 604: 603: 602: 601: 600: 599: 598: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 576: 573: 571: 570: 538: 505: 504: 503: 502: 464:describes the 447: 445: 444: 443: 442: 431: 415: 413: 412: 399: 397: 396: 379: 377: 376: 354: 334: 331: 322: 321: 310: 304: 283: 280: 262: 237: 223: 212: 206: 204: 203: 191: 179: 161: 135:zitterbewegung 131: 130: 77: 76: 75: 67: 65: 60: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 806: 794: 792: 787: 781: 780: 777: 774: 770: 767: 766: 765: 762: 759: 752: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 740: 737: 735: 731: 727: 719: 716: 715: 714: 713: 708: 705: 704: 703: 702: 696: 694: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 682: 678: 677: 673: 672: 668: 663: 659: 656: 655:Dear Christy 652: 648: 645: 636: 633: 632: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 624: 621: 620: 616: 615: 610: 607: 592: 589: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 581: 580: 579: 578: 577: 574: 569: 566: 565: 564: 558: 554: 550: 546: 542: 539: 537: 534: 530: 526: 522: 518: 514: 510: 507: 506: 501: 498: 494: 491: 490: 489: 488: 487: 485: 481: 477: 476:200.149.62.83 473: 467: 463: 459: 455: 451: 440: 436: 432: 429: 428: 426: 422: 418: 417: 416: 410: 406: 402: 401: 400: 394: 390: 386: 382: 381: 380: 374: 370: 366: 365: 364: 363:, because: 362: 358: 352: 350: 346: 342: 338: 332: 329: 327: 319: 315: 311: 309: 305: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 286: 285: 281: 278: 276: 272: 271: 266: 260: 259: 255: 251: 247: 246: 241: 238:2- The item 235: 233: 229: 228: 221: 220: 216: 210: 209: 202: 199: 195: 192: 190: 187: 183: 180: 178: 175: 172: 169: 165: 162: 160: 157: 153: 150: 149: 148: 147: 144: 140: 136: 128: 122: 118: 114: 110: 105: 101: 96: 92: 88: 84: 80: 79: 74: 71: 64: 61: 59: 58: 55: 53: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 785: 782: 768: 763: 760: 757: 750: 742: 741: 738: 733: 732: 728: 724: 706: 692: 690: 683: 679: 674: 670: 669: 664: 660: 657: 653: 649: 646: 643: 634: 625: 622: 617: 613: 611: 608: 605: 590: 575: 572: 562: 560: 540: 528: 524: 508: 492: 465: 457: 446: 438: 434: 424: 420: 414: 408: 398: 388: 384: 378: 372: 368: 360: 356: 353: 348: 344: 340: 333: 330: 323: 317: 313: 307: 301: 297: 282: 279: 274: 268: 264: 263:3- The item 261: 257: 249: 243: 239: 236: 231: 225: 222: 218: 217:s argument: 214: 211: 207: 205: 196:as above. -- 193: 181: 163: 151: 132: 51: 45: 43: 31: 28: 533:Someguy1221 470:—Preceding 454:Cold fusion 326:Cold fusion 290:Cold Fusion 245:Cold fusion 227:cold fusion 529:everything 525:inherently 339:is not an 527:violates 513:verfiable 184:As above. 166:per nom. 769:Response 761:Regards 493:Response 472:unsigned 407:shows a 385:is wrong 127:View log 563:Hut 8.5 549:WP:SOAP 521:notable 509:Delete. 495:tl;dr. 423:. The 267:in the 186:Alberon 171:megalon 100:protect 95:history 52:JForget 773:JuJube 545:WP:COI 541:Delete 497:JuJube 318:FACT: 240:Theory 215:Alsub' 194:Delete 182:Delete 164:Delete 156:Alksub 152:Delete 143:JuJube 139:WP:NOT 104:delete 46:Delete 551:. An 458:FACTS 409:FACT: 357:FACT 308:FACTS 198:NeilN 121:views 113:watch 109:links 16:< 547:and 480:talk 466:FACT 439:FACT 435:FACT 425:FACT 389:FACT 373:FACT 349:FACT 302:FACT 298:FACT 292:and 174:2000 168:Maxa 117:logs 91:talk 87:edit 515:by 256:: 242:in 125:– ( 559:. 482:) 359:, 351:. 277:. 119:| 115:| 111:| 107:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 48:-- 478:( 395:. 375:. 129:) 123:) 85:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
JForget
03:07, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
"Zitterbewegung and Cold Fusion"
Articles for deletion/"Zitterbewegung and Cold Fusion"
"Zitterbewegung and Cold Fusion"
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
zitterbewegung
WP:NOT
JuJube
05:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Alksub
06:25, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Maxa
megalon
2000
07:57, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Alberon
09:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
NeilN

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑