306:) wearing ++ungood; on a T-shirt than there are wearing Knowledge. Krimpet - Neologism, yes. No acceptable sources? Hardly. The history of the term is well-documented, and the provenance of the sources is good. Speaking of provenance of sources, Wwwwwolf, I've fixed the inaccurate citation on the C++ page. You're very welcome.
287:
for deletion despite that obviously being a dictdef page, I tend to agree with the sentiment of that comment. Or does the ++ungood; page simply lack a stub footer? Lack of potential for expansion should not be a cause for deletion - otherwise, we should delete the entry on
Shakespeare because he's
121:
A dictdef for a geek joke. This has no real potential for expansion (a bunch of sources have been added that supposedly show notability, but they're just pictures of notable people or fansites), and no real hope for an encyclopedia article. -
292:
springs to mind, as does much of the rest of the Words category, which should probably be removed. On T-shirts: I suspect that there are rather more people (including the notable
114:
409:
already existed and built on that. On signing posts - the history log already holds that information. I don't see the value in signing posts when you're anonymous. Is
348:
288:
dead and potential for article growth has been limited by his demise. There are a lot of articles that fall under the dictdef definition -
283:
as examples of dictionary definition pages, and citing apparent inconsistency in enforcement of dictdef policy. Since you haven't proposed
137:
437:
Newbie is not a dicdef, as it is used very much in popular culture, in gaming, among others. However, the article in itself needs some
429:
322:
87:
82:
199:
17:
91:
296:
267:
74:
375:- I feel that since this article includes one of the words used in the following book, it might/should be redirected to
333:
could probably be cleaned up. This obscure joke-only term really can't, due to a lack of references we can use. -
472:
36:
279:, naturally. ManinBlack, I see this delete proposal stems from a comment on your talk page citing ++ungood; and
471:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
344:
133:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
451:
446:
396:
391:
385:
380:
367:
353:
271:
236:
224:
203:
175:
155:
142:
56:
46:
190:
with no acceptable sources. The fact that it was coined to put on a T-shirt underscores this further. —
425:
417:
318:
310:
78:
334:
218:
123:
172:
263:
195:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
293:
164:
421:
314:
233:
152:
299:
213:
51:
289:
187:
168:
167:(the Orwell version) is a redirect, but I don't think this one merits even that. --
376:
303:
258:
252:
connection has already been discussed to adequate detail (with sources and all) in
191:
108:
70:
62:
184:
441:
cleaning up. Nobody actually looks for ++ungood; it should just redirect to
364:
442:
406:
249:
256:. I don't think we need to explain all possible variations of it... --
410:
330:
284:
280:
253:
245:
465:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
445:. SIGN YOUR POSTS! It makes it easier to know who wrote what. --
401:
Actually, this article was created because I discovered
402:
104:
100:
96:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
475:). No further edits should be made to this page.
211:as non-notable joke. Can only ever be a dicdef.
8:
390:Btw, Lloyd Wood, please sign your posts. --
7:
24:
234:Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
298:and the rather less notable
492:
452:23:51, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
397:16:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
386:16:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
368:20:04, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
354:19:17, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
272:08:39, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
237:03:18, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
225:23:29, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
204:22:39, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
176:21:39, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
156:20:51, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
143:19:03, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
57:17:05, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
468:Please do not modify it.
403:a redirect from ++ungood
32:Please do not modify it.
363:- it is a dicdef. --
413:a dictdef, or not?
254:C++#The name "C++"
232:a dicdef at best.
448:Įиʛ§øç βїʛβяøтњєя
434:
420:comment added by
393:Įиʛ§øç βїʛβяøтњєя
382:Įиʛ§øç βїʛβяøтњєя
352:
327:
313:comment added by
163:as NN geekcruft.
141:
483:
470:
449:
433:
414:
394:
383:
342:
340:
326:
307:
294:Guido van Rossum
223:
165:Doubleplusungood
151:as nomination.
131:
129:
112:
94:
54:
34:
491:
490:
486:
485:
484:
482:
481:
480:
479:
473:deletion review
466:
447:
415:
392:
381:
336:
308:
212:
125:
85:
69:
66:
52:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
489:
487:
478:
477:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
370:
358:
357:
356:
274:
239:
227:
206:
178:
158:
119:
118:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
488:
476:
474:
469:
463:
462:
453:
450:
444:
440:
436:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
412:
408:
404:
400:
399:
398:
395:
389:
388:
387:
384:
378:
374:
371:
369:
366:
362:
359:
355:
350:
346:
341:
339:
332:
329:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
305:
301:
300:Danny O'Brien
297:
295:
291:
290:Orange (word)
286:
282:
278:
275:
273:
269:
265:
261:
260:
255:
251:
247:
243:
240:
238:
235:
231:
228:
226:
222:
221:
217:
216:
210:
207:
205:
201:
197:
193:
189:
186:
182:
179:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
157:
154:
150:
147:
146:
145:
144:
139:
135:
130:
128:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
49:
48:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
467:
464:
438:
416:— Preceding
372:
360:
337:
309:— Preceding
304:Aaron Swartz
276:
257:
241:
229:
219:
214:
208:
180:
160:
148:
126:
120:
45:
43:
31:
28:
185:non-notable
422:Lloyd Wood
315:Lloyd Wood
153:Springnuts
47:unperson'd
335:A Man In
188:neologism
124:A Man In
71:++ungood;
63:++ungood;
53:Wizardman
443:Newspeak
430:contribs
418:unsigned
407:Newspeak
349:past ops
345:conspire
323:contribs
311:unsigned
250:Newspeak
169:Dhartung
138:past ops
134:conspire
115:View log
379:...? --
373:Comment
259:wwwwolf
192:Krimpet
88:protect
83:history
411:newbie
361:Delete
331:Newbie
285:newbie
281:newbie
268:growls
242:Delete
230:delete
220:scribe
209:Delete
200:review
181:Delete
161:Delete
149:delete
92:delete
439:major
338:Bl♟ck
264:barks
127:Bl♟ck
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
426:talk
377:1984
365:Whpq
319:talk
302:and
277:Keep
244:the
196:talk
183:, a
173:Talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
405:to
246:C++
215:WjB
113:– (
50:.--
432:)
428:•
347:|
325:)
321:•
270:)
202:)
171:|
136:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
424:(
351:)
343:(
317:(
266:/
262:(
248:/
198:/
194:(
140:)
132:(
117:)
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.