179:. One of the tremendous benefits of Knowledge (XXG) is its coverage of specialist areas such as trains. This article is one of many in the Wiki Trains project, a project which is trying to build up a comprehensive view of the subject, not just in English speaking countries, but elsewhere. Inevitably that means listing lesser known classes alongside the more famous ones. The main problem with this article is not so much notability, but lack of detail and references. However I see it as 'work in progress' as part of the Wiki Trains project.
311:
of CD, this appears to be the most common EMU of the company, and makes up a significant part of the transportation infrastructure around Prague. Systematic bias is absolutely a concern here, considering that every EMU, DMU, locomotive and carriage type of Amtrak and the
British railways have
221:
against topics from outside the
English-speaking world and per arguments by Bermicourt. I don't see that lesser known trains (which I know little about anyway) are any less notable than lesser known type of car. This might be a good time to clarify types/classes of transportation vehicles in
156:. Subject seems to be sufficiently notable to me. Expansion of coverage of subjects in countries where English is not the primary language (and particularly those lesser known areas) seems to me to be a good thing to try for.
251:. The article makes no assertion of notability for the subject, and I have yet to see any !vote where someone has offered a cogent explanation on why the subject is notable or how it falls in line with
198:-- I just added an external link to this page. Would this help in saving the article from deletion? You could use it to expand the article, and even add it as a possible reference. ----
331:
146:. Sometimes a locomotive or EMU is better known by its marketing name or nickname than by its class designation. There are several references under its alternative name CityElefant
121:
355:-- Articles of callses of vehicle (including locos) are useful. Those on individual ones (unless exceptionally notable) are not. HOwever this is only a stub.
280:
is a completely different concept from anti-Anglophonic sentiment - the meaning of the word "systemic" in that phrase is precisely that the bias is
223:
88:
83:
92:
17:
255:. I have no problems withdrawing a nomination if that is proven, but claiming a non-existent anti-Anglophonic sentiment is bizarre.
75:
48:
in view of
Eastmain's addition of references to the article that confirm the notability of the subject. Thank you, Eastmain!
272:. The very first !vote by Eastmain offered a cogent explanation on why the subject is notable and how it falls in line with
382:
36:
381:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
364:
346:
321:
293:
264:
235:
207:
188:
169:
137:
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
360:
289:
260:
184:
133:
79:
53:
316:
356:
231:
342:
285:
165:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
248:
218:
157:
256:
203:
180:
129:
49:
71:
63:
313:
273:
252:
277:
227:
338:
161:
308:
109:
199:
312:
articles. There is no reason to call the Czech counterparts less notable.
128:
I am unable to identify the specific notability of this subject.
375:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
116:
105:
101:
97:
332:
247:This nomination has absolutely nothing to do with
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
385:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
224:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (Transportation)
330:: This debate has been included in the
307:per Eastmain. Also, from looking at the
226:while the policy is still a proposal.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
276:by linking to reliable sources.
1:
284:the result of any sentiment.
365:19:05, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
347:17:42, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
322:11:34, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
294:18:42, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
265:11:27, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
236:04:31, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
208:23:19, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
189:22:37, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
170:15:36, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
138:13:05, 7 November 2008 (UTC)
58:23:05, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
402:
249:countering systematic bias
378:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
219:counter systematic bias
46:Nomination withdrawn
44:The result was
349:
335:
319:
160:notified of AfD.
393:
380:
336:
326:
317:
148:
147:
119:
113:
95:
34:
401:
400:
396:
395:
394:
392:
391:
390:
389:
383:deletion review
376:
215:Procedural keep
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
399:
397:
388:
387:
370:
368:
367:
350:
324:
301:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
239:
238:
211:
210:
192:
191:
173:
172:
150:
149:
126:
125:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
398:
386:
384:
379:
373:
372:
371:
366:
362:
358:
357:Peterkingiron
354:
351:
348:
344:
340:
333:
329:
325:
323:
320:
315:
310:
306:
303:
302:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
278:Systemic bias
275:
271:
268:
267:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
243:
242:
241:
240:
237:
233:
229:
225:
220:
216:
213:
212:
209:
205:
201:
197:
194:
193:
190:
186:
182:
178:
175:
174:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
152:
151:
145:
142:
141:
140:
139:
135:
131:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
377:
374:
369:
352:
327:
304:
286:Phil Bridger
281:
269:
244:
214:
195:
176:
153:
143:
127:
72:ČD Class 471
64:ČD Class 471
45:
43:
31:
28:
309:stock list
257:Ecoleetage
181:Bermicourt
130:Ecoleetage
50:Ecoleetage
339:• Gene93k
314:Sjakkalle
318:(Check!)
228:McWomble
122:View log
270:Comment
245:Comment
196:Comment
162:Mjroots
89:protect
84:history
117:delete
93:delete
200:DanTD
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
361:talk
353:Keep
343:talk
328:Note
305:Keep
290:talk
274:WP:N
261:talk
253:WP:N
232:talk
204:talk
185:talk
177:Keep
166:talk
154:Keep
144:Keep
134:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
337:--
334:.
282:not
217:to
158:TWP
363:)
345:)
292:)
263:)
234:)
206:)
187:)
168:)
136:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
359:(
341:(
288:(
259:(
230:(
202:(
183:(
164:(
132:(
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.