Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/-oid - Knowledge

Source 📝

142:
The topic is invalid as well, the topic is supposed to be an underlying concept and not purely a word or purely lexical- that's what dictionaries do, and do it far better than we can here.
389:, where it would make a valid list entry that doesn't already exist. There is only a small bit of content to be merged, but deletion is an unnecessary step towards putting it there. 147:
The article contains a simple list of words that happen to match a particular lexical pattern- again, dictionaries do it much better, and are usually more complete as well.
120: 204: 386: 252: 409:
Some of the other stuff may be salvageable, but a lot of it isn't, and a lot has been deleted in the past as well by others; but yeah otherstuff.- (
131:
The article name is invalid; article names in encyclopedias are supposed to be nouns or verbs (and not even adjectives), so it violates
17: 294:
My point is that I'd be more comfortable voting to delete this article if it were co-nominated with similar articles in the
316:
and feel free to nominate for deletion any other articles (or group of articles) you don't think belong on Knowledge.
54: 460: 36: 459:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
87: 82: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
91: 259:
there. A dictionary can contain this info better, and redirecting to the list would help people get to it.
331: 394: 339: 303: 281: 264: 74: 49: 418: 357: 313: 164: 334:) is also an argument to avoid . My !vote is to merge and redirect, if you'd like to address that. 321: 212: 190: 182: 445: 441: 422: 398: 361: 343: 325: 307: 285: 268: 236: 216: 194: 168: 56: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
390: 335: 299: 295: 277: 260: 232: 410: 349: 156: 317: 208: 186: 132: 437: 108: 228: 136: 152: 78: 247:
for whatever that's worth). Looks like the compatible content should be
127:
Pure dictionary definition with no hope of making encyclopedia article
155:, this is a dictionary entry with no realistic chance of recovery. - ( 178: 453:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
244: 70: 62: 115: 104: 100: 96: 243:
There are articles about other types of morphemes (
135:, whereas affixes are valid articles in wiktionary. 177:per nom. Wiktionary already has a better entry at 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 463:). No further edits should be made to this page. 181:, but if this is kept it should be renamed to 205:list of Language-related deletion discussions 8: 387:List of Greek words with English derivatives 253:List of Greek words with English derivatives 199: 203:: This debate has been included in the 227:per nom. Topic is well-covered at WD. 7: 24: 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 153:Knowledge is not a dictionary 298:. Consistency is important. 151:This is a textbook case of 480: 446:18:26, 14 July 2009 (UTC) 423:11:48, 14 July 2009 (UTC) 399:21:01, 14 July 2009 (UTC) 362:11:48, 14 July 2009 (UTC) 344:09:56, 14 July 2009 (UTC) 326:09:54, 14 July 2009 (UTC) 308:09:00, 14 July 2009 (UTC) 286:06:21, 13 July 2009 (UTC) 269:18:43, 12 July 2009 (UTC) 237:15:33, 12 July 2009 (UTC) 217:13:58, 12 July 2009 (UTC) 195:13:58, 12 July 2009 (UTC) 169:13:42, 12 July 2009 (UTC) 57:21:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC) 456:Please do not modify it. 185:per naming conventions. 32:Please do not modify it. 330:I'm aware. "Per nom" ( 348:Redirect to where?- ( 255:and then the article 44:The result was 219: 48:per consensus. -- 471: 458: 296:Category:Affixes 118: 112: 94: 51:Anthony.bradbury 34: 479: 478: 474: 473: 472: 470: 469: 468: 467: 461:deletion review 454: 332:WP:PERNOMINATOR 114: 85: 69: 66: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 477: 475: 466: 465: 449: 448: 430: 429: 428: 427: 426: 425: 407: 406: 405: 404: 403: 402: 401: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 367: 366: 365: 364: 289: 288: 271: 240: 239: 221: 220: 197: 149: 148: 144: 143: 139: 138: 125: 124: 65: 60: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 476: 464: 462: 457: 451: 450: 447: 443: 439: 435: 432: 431: 424: 420: 416: 412: 408: 400: 396: 392: 388: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 374: 363: 359: 355: 351: 347: 346: 345: 341: 337: 333: 329: 328: 327: 323: 319: 315: 314:WP:OTHERSTUFF 311: 310: 309: 305: 301: 297: 293: 292: 291: 290: 287: 283: 279: 275: 272: 270: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 241: 238: 234: 230: 226: 223: 222: 218: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 196: 192: 188: 184: 180: 176: 173: 172: 171: 170: 166: 162: 158: 154: 146: 145: 141: 140: 137: 134: 130: 129: 128: 122: 117: 110: 106: 102: 98: 93: 89: 84: 80: 76: 72: 68: 67: 64: 61: 59: 58: 55: 53: 52: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 455: 452: 433: 414: 353: 273: 256: 248: 224: 200: 183:Oid (suffix) 174: 160: 150: 126: 50: 45: 43: 31: 28: 391:Synchronism 336:Synchronism 300:Synchronism 278:Niteshift36 261:Synchronism 436:per nom. 415:Wolfkeeper 354:Wolfkeeper 257:redirected 161:Wolfkeeper 318:Thryduulf 276:per nom. 209:Thryduulf 187:Thryduulf 179:wikt:-oid 121:View log 438:CarbonX 88:protect 83:history 434:Delete 274:Delete 249:merged 229:Cnilep 225:Delete 175:Delete 133:WP:MOS 116:delete 92:delete 46:Delete 251:into 119:) – ( 109:views 101:watch 97:links 16:< 442:talk 419:Talk 411:User 395:talk 358:Talk 350:User 340:talk 322:talk 312:See 304:talk 282:talk 265:talk 245:-nik 233:talk 213:talk 201:Note 191:talk 165:Talk 157:User 105:logs 79:talk 75:edit 71:-oid 63:-oid 444:) 421:) 413:) 397:) 360:) 352:) 342:) 324:) 306:) 284:) 267:) 235:) 215:) 207:. 193:) 167:) 159:) 107:| 103:| 99:| 95:| 90:| 86:| 81:| 77:| 440:( 417:( 393:( 356:( 338:( 320:( 302:( 280:( 263:( 231:( 211:( 189:( 163:( 123:) 113:( 111:) 73:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Anthony.bradbury

21:17, 19 July 2009 (UTC)
-oid
-oid
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
WP:MOS

Knowledge is not a dictionary
User
Talk
13:42, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
wikt:-oid
Oid (suffix)
Thryduulf
talk
13:58, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
list of Language-related deletion discussions

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.