Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/3XX - Knowledge

Source ๐Ÿ“

521:, the presumption that merely having a licence makes a radio station notable aside (and I would really strongly challenge and dispute such a presumption), this defunct station seems to have picked up no coverage in any reliable sources as far as I can tell (and minimal coverage even as far as directories, forums and the like go). The fact that the licence can't even be easily verified would indicate to me that this article has serious 31: 398:. The closest match in those lists is 'AM 1611' but that station is licensed to Albany in Western Australia, a long way away from what is described in the article. Unless some evidence that this station was licensed can be located, it cant enjoy the benefit that licensed stations receive in receiving presumed notability.-- 454:... which, politely, I'm challenging. If a group received a licence and operated a station for say, a month, would it be notable? I'm not meaning to be silly or trivialising, but this seems to be an instance where the consensus, irrespective of how long it's been in place, seems very much open to challenge. 419:
argument I'd suggest most stations of notability in fact have licenses, but not the other way around. The example of 3XX seems to prove the point, in that yes, it presumably satisfied the requirements to gain a license, but subsequently endured an anonymous existence which attracted no coverage from
275:
3XX was a reasonable sized narrowcaster in Melbourne's community and does deserve to have a small detail about it's history in place on the Knowledge community. As for sources of it's article, are the existing website cached on the wayback machine, and current articles about it's closure on mediaspy
256:
I noted the removed content before marking it for deletion but it's unsourced content which would have been removed anyway. I can start up a radio station tomorrow and just because it's licensed doesn't make it notable. 3XX was licensed as a narrowcast
305:
Those (The former website, Mediaspy and Jocks Journal) are not reliable sources. 3XX was not a well known broadcaster if it was there would have been a news story about it starting up and closing down but nothing shows up on
307: 150: 213: 40: 261:
and it will point out that 1611 is off the dial and is cheap since not everyone can pick it up) radio station and not a broadcast radio station.
331:
If, in fact, this was a licensed broadcast station in Australia, it is notable. The article needs references, but the subject is notable. --
294: 347:
Just because it was licensed since 2002 (which the article claims but doesn't back-up) doesn't make it notable. Also I've found nothing on
570: 17: 240:. Licensed broadcast radio stations are presumed notable and notability does not expire. I will check this out further. 552: 415:
I'm happy to be persuaded otherwise but I can't agree that a licence automatically confers notability. Taking a
395: 298: 281: 65: 46: 551:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
64:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
117: 112: 277: 121: 442: 403: 184: 157:
3XX is not notable (Mixing up renewal dates isn't notable) and can't find any reliable sources for 3XX.
290: 200: 104: 82: 438: 399: 369:
comment above, licensed broadcast stations are presumed notable and notability does not expire. --
480: 374: 336: 245: 108: 58:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
533: 505: 501: 484: 463: 459: 446: 429: 425: 407: 378: 360: 356: 340: 319: 315: 285: 270: 266: 249: 228: 203: 188: 180: 166: 162: 86: 197: 78: 100: 92: 530: 475:
temporary, it does not matter how long ago the station was notable nor for how long. -
224: 258: 564: 476: 370: 332: 366: 241: 437:
it's a long established consensus that licenses stations are considered notable.--
391: 138: 526: 522: 497: 455: 421: 352: 311: 262: 176: 158: 220: 545:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
25: 348: 496:
been notable, irrespective of licensing considerations.
238: 145: 134: 130: 126: 390:I'm not finding this station listed in either the 68:). No further edits should be made to this page. 555:). No further edits should be made to this page. 237:. This article had a large removal of content 214:list of Australia-related deletion discussions 8: 276:and jocksjournal not enough information? 212:: This debate has been included in the 45:For an explanation of the process, see 7: 392:list of licensed commercial stations 396:list of open narrowcasting services 41:deletion review on 2009 October 29 24: 29: 420:significant secondary sources. 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 259:Narrowband Area Service - ACMA 1: 196:- no evidence of notability. 534:11:27, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 506:11:16, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 485:10:32, 25 August 2008 (UTC) 464:04:57, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 447:01:11, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 430:01:04, 22 August 2008 (UTC) 408:20:11, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 379:18:05, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 361:15:45, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 341:15:36, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 320:14:00, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 286:13:24, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 271:12:50, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 250:12:40, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 229:11:38, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 204:10:29, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 189:10:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 167:09:21, 21 August 2008 (UTC) 87:22:06, 26 August 2008 (UTC) 587: 47:Knowledge:Deletion review 571:Pages at deletion review 548:Please do not modify it. 492:... and in my view it's 61:Please do not modify it. 349:http://www.acma.gov.au 471:Since notability is 351:about this station. 73:The result was 302: 293:comment added by 231: 217: 53: 52: 39:was subject to a 578: 550: 288: 218: 208: 148: 142: 124: 63: 33: 32: 26: 586: 585: 581: 580: 579: 577: 576: 575: 561: 560: 559: 553:deletion review 546: 417:cause vs effect 295:220.233.110.131 278:Ontheradionetau 144: 115: 99: 96: 66:deletion review 59: 37:This discussion 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 584: 582: 574: 573: 563: 562: 558: 557: 540: 538: 537: 516: 515: 514: 513: 512: 511: 510: 509: 508: 410: 384: 383: 382: 381: 344: 343: 325: 324: 323: 322: 273: 253: 252: 232: 206: 191: 175:as failure of 155: 154: 95: 90: 71: 70: 54: 51: 50: 44: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 583: 572: 569: 568: 566: 556: 554: 549: 543: 542: 541: 535: 532: 528: 524: 520: 517: 507: 503: 499: 495: 491: 488: 487: 486: 482: 478: 474: 470: 467: 466: 465: 461: 457: 453: 450: 449: 448: 444: 440: 436: 433: 432: 431: 427: 423: 418: 414: 411: 409: 405: 401: 397: 393: 389: 386: 385: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 363: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 345: 342: 338: 334: 330: 327: 326: 321: 317: 313: 309: 304: 303: 300: 296: 292: 287: 283: 279: 274: 272: 268: 264: 260: 255: 254: 251: 247: 243: 239: 236: 233: 230: 226: 222: 215: 211: 207: 205: 202: 199: 195: 192: 190: 186: 182: 178: 174: 171: 170: 169: 168: 164: 160: 152: 147: 140: 136: 132: 128: 123: 119: 114: 110: 106: 102: 98: 97: 94: 91: 89: 88: 84: 80: 76: 69: 67: 62: 56: 55: 48: 42: 38: 35: 28: 27: 19: 547: 544: 539: 518: 493: 489: 472: 468: 451: 434: 416: 412: 387: 328: 234: 209: 193: 172: 156: 74: 72: 60: 57: 36: 308:Google News 289:โ€”Preceding 181:Movingboxes 201:Od Mishehu 79:PhilKnight 531:Lankiveil 529:issues. 367:Gene93k's 242:โ€ข Gene93k 198:ืขื•ื“ ืžื™ืฉื”ื• 565:Category 477:Dravecky 439:Rtphokie 400:Rtphokie 371:Winger84 333:Winger84 291:unsigned 151:View log 490:Comment 469:Comment 452:Comment 435:Comment 394:or the 235:Comment 118:protect 113:history 519:Delete 498:Murtoa 456:Murtoa 422:Murtoa 413:Delete 388:Delete 353:Bidgee 312:Bidgee 263:Bidgee 194:Delete 173:Delete 159:Bidgee 146:delete 122:delete 75:delete 494:never 149:) โ€“ ( 139:views 131:watch 127:links 16:< 527:WP:V 525:and 523:WP:N 502:talk 481:talk 460:talk 443:talk 426:talk 404:talk 375:talk 365:Per 357:talk 337:talk 329:Keep 316:talk 299:talk 282:talk 267:talk 246:talk 225:talk 221:WWGB 210:Note 185:talk 177:WP:N 163:talk 135:logs 109:talk 105:edit 83:talk 473:not 216:. 101:3XX 93:3XX 567:: 504:) 483:) 462:) 445:) 428:) 406:) 377:) 359:) 339:) 318:) 310:. 301:) 284:) 269:) 248:) 227:) 187:) 179:. 165:) 137:| 133:| 129:| 125:| 120:| 116:| 111:| 107:| 85:) 77:. 43:. 536:. 500:( 479:( 458:( 441:( 424:( 402:( 373:( 355:( 335:( 314:( 297:( 280:( 265:( 257:( 244:( 223:( 219:โ€” 183:( 161:( 153:) 143:( 141:) 103:( 81:( 49:.

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review on 2009 October 29
Knowledge:Deletion review
deletion review
PhilKnight
talk
22:06, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
3XX
3XX
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Bidgee
talk
09:21, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
WP:N
Movingboxes
talk
10:19, 21 August 2008 (UTC)
ืขื•ื“ ืžื™ืฉื”ื•
Od Mishehu
10:29, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘