218:: I tagged the articles for the three towers for merger, as there was little reason to suggest stand-alone articles. But there is very little reason to keep the articles anyway. They were PRODded shortly after creation but dePRODded by the creator who added references, but the references don't appear to be reliable ones. Of the three references, "proyectosdevida" is the website of the towers' construction company Bolívar, Aisa is a real estate company who were managing apartments in the towers, and Olga Miranda is a TV chef, and the reference to the towers is no longer available on her website anyway, even in an archived version, so we have no idea what she said about them (or why a TV chef should be a reliable source). The towers' sole claim to fame seems to be that they were the tallest in the country at the time, but they were surpassed within a year and so they don't appear to have any lasting notability.
378:(currently a redlink). The A building was apparently the very tallest building in El Salvador for a period, and certainly is among the tallest existing buildings by some reasonable cutoff. The B building, though shorter, is taller than the C building and my guess is that it also may rank among the tallest. (Was the B building the tallest for a while before A was?) Keep for now, in absence of sensible country-level list-article. An alternative would be to create the List of tallest buildings in El Salvador, copy the material here into a section on this building, and redirect to the section. I almost always disagree with AFDs about tall buildings because it is always better to merge/redirect to a valid list-article of tall buildings, at least, if not keep the article outright. Here, the nomination is premature: the focus in developing Knowledge (XXG) in this area should first be on creating
434:
clearly should be on such a list. Don't delete this and lose the info we have (including the fact that several people have tried and failed to find better sources), taking
Knowledge (XXG) backwards. Do your homework / proper preparation / figure out if B and C buildings also should be on that list. I think it is fair and good to say go away for now, come back to AFD a few months from now if it still makes sense. Generally, we should support positive development, not negative. Seeing a positive way forward, rather than one which shuts down contributors and blocks progress, should certainly be the closer's main concern, IMHO. --
415:
just state what should be done. If you create a sourced list of the tallest buildings in the country I would have no objections to a redirect, but as it stands it has no good independent sources whatsoever, and if we're going to keep articles without any reliable sources then
Knowledge (XXG) ceases to become a reliable encyclopedia. The nomination is hardly premature: the article has existed for more than six years with no independent sources. And whoever the closer for this nomination is, it isn't their job to find "a way forward".
465:
create such an article if you want the information to be kept. If nobody else adds to this deletion discussion, I believe you will get your wish – with just one "keep" vote and one "delete" vote it will probably be closed as "no consensus" and the articles will stay for the time being, which will give you time to create a list. But I think there is a good chance that if no action is taken on these articles in the meantime, they will be put up for deletion again in due course.
366:. I don't agree with the nominator. A building that was known to be the tallest in the country is notable. Note a merger of three articles could be completed without an AFD, but it is not appropriate to delete all three by AFDs, which is what is proposed. AFDs should not have been opened. As I argued in related
414:
and redirect there. With respect, I don't really follow your argument for keeping this article, or the ones for the other two towers. It should not be kept just because another article doesn't exist. If you want to keep the article, the onus is on you to provide good sources to justify that keep, not
433:
As I reply in the "A" discussion: The deletion nominator brings the attention of many editors to a deficient area, tall buildings in El
Salvador. I think it is appropriate for others to say don't do that in haphazard order, be organized, create the tall buildings list first. This building pretty
459:
It might have brought the article to the attention of "many editors", but after more than three weeks of being listed for deletion, we are the only two people discussing the article, so clearly nobody else is reading this or feels strongly enough to voice an opinion. I think we can both agree that
464:
the tallest buildings in El
Salvador, I agree that they are better served on a list of tallest buildings in the country rather than having individual articles. However, as nobody else feels inclined to improve these articles or create such a list, I'm afraid it might fall upon you to research and
460:
these buildings have a single claim to fame, that they were for a very brief period the tallest in El
Salvador. Seeing as they have no other notable attributes, that there are no reliable independent sources at all to back up these articles, and that they are now only
169:
371:
367:
122:
254:
234:
163:
129:
95:
90:
99:
82:
383:
17:
352:
184:
151:
411:
379:
375:
445:
397:
334:
300:
276:
497:
145:
40:
205:
474:
450:
424:
402:
356:
325:
291:
266:
246:
227:
209:
64:
141:
86:
191:
348:
262:
242:
200:
This page does not meet the
Knowledge (XXG) Standards for notability. As such, it has no place on this site
78:
70:
52:. Like the A tower, I'm happy to userfy, but there is more support and more policy rationale for deletion.
319:
201:
59:
493:
470:
420:
287:
223:
36:
177:
157:
344:
258:
238:
440:
392:
311:
53:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
492:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
466:
416:
219:
435:
387:
116:
386:. To the closer, note this is clear direction on a way forward. --
486:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
337:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
303:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
279:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
372:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Campestre 105 Torre C
368:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/105 Campestre Torre A
112:
108:
104:
176:
374:, there is a striking need in Knowledge (XXG) for a
343:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
309:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
285:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
190:
255:list of Architecture-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
500:). No further edits should be made to this page.
235:list of El Salvador-related deletion discussions
8:
253:Note: This debate has been included in the
233:Note: This debate has been included in the
252:
232:
412:list of tallest buildings in El Salvador
380:List of tallest buildings in El Salvador
376:List of tallest buildings in El Salvador
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
384:Category:Lists of tallest buildings
24:
1:
475:00:15, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
451:20:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
425:14:48, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
403:04:30, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
357:10:41, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
65:23:35, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
326:00:52, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
292:08:42, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
267:15:33, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
247:15:33, 17 August 2016 (UTC)
228:19:36, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
210:18:07, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
517:
489:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
79:105 Campestre Torre B
71:105 Campestre Torre B
359:
328:
294:
269:
249:
202:ThadeusOfNazereth
508:
491:
448:
443:
438:
400:
395:
390:
342:
340:
338:
322:
317:
314:
308:
306:
304:
290:
284:
282:
280:
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
34:
516:
515:
511:
510:
509:
507:
506:
505:
504:
498:deletion review
487:
446:
441:
436:
398:
393:
388:
360:
333:
331:
329:
320:
315:
312:
299:
297:
295:
286:
275:
273:
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
514:
512:
503:
502:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
454:
453:
428:
427:
405:
341:
330:
307:
296:
283:
272:
271:
270:
250:
230:
198:
197:
134:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
513:
501:
499:
495:
490:
484:
483:
476:
472:
468:
463:
458:
457:
456:
455:
452:
449:
444:
439:
432:
431:
430:
429:
426:
422:
418:
413:
409:
406:
404:
401:
396:
391:
385:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
362:
361:
358:
354:
353:contributions
350:
346:
345:Jo-Jo Eumerus
339:
336:
327:
324:
323:
318:
305:
302:
293:
289:
288:North America
281:
278:
268:
264:
260:
259:Coolabahapple
256:
251:
248:
244:
240:
239:Coolabahapple
236:
231:
229:
225:
221:
217:
214:
213:
212:
211:
207:
203:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
63:
62:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
488:
485:
461:
410:or create a
407:
363:
332:
310:
298:
274:
215:
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
60:
55:Dennis Brown
54:
49:
47:
31:
28:
467:Richard3120
417:Richard3120
220:Richard3120
164:free images
494:talk page
37:talk page
496:or in a
335:Relisted
301:Relisted
277:Relisted
123:View log
39:or in a
382:. See
216:Comment
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
408:Delete
321:(talk)
313:Yellow
142:Google
100:delete
50:delete
462:among
316:Dingo
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
471:talk
421:talk
370:and
364:Keep
349:talk
263:talk
243:talk
224:talk
206:talk
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
442:ncr
394:ncr
192:TWL
121:– (
473:)
447:am
437:do
423:)
399:am
389:do
355:)
351:,
265:)
257:.
245:)
237:.
226:)
208:)
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
61:2¢
58:-
469:(
419:(
347:(
261:(
241:(
222:(
204:(
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.