383:. It has a major contractor on board, that has just bought 50% of the project, and it is now within 12 months of physical construction starting. So it seems pretty likely to be going ahead. But the key factor is present notability -- a proposal for a major building like this on a site like Bishopsgate is notable, and something we should cover. (In addition to it having the required sourcing for notability by-the-book).
331:
for now. The key factor is enduring notability. It might have notability if the building goes ahead (depending on whether a building that tall is notable in a district full of tall buildings), but it certainly won't have enduring notability if it doesn't go ahead. At the moment, we don't know what
191:
Google news finds almost no reporting on this vapourware construction project. Google books finds nothing at all. If
Knowledge (XXG) were a crystal ball, which it isn't, this article might belong here. It's not, it doesn't. A passing mention in the
160:
303:
115:
193:
154:
277:
239:. A planned skyscraper in the capital of a sovereign state is notable. There is a reliable source referenced (skyskcrapernews.com), so only need inline citations. --
120:
88:
83:
92:
17:
224:
75:
175:
142:
341:
407:
36:
136:
406:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
337:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
253:
Actually, only as recently as two weeks ago there appears to have been public activity regarding these plans:
392:
372:
345:
318:
292:
265:
248:
231:
203:
200:
132:
57:
368:
182:
221:
79:
333:
168:
355:
210:
197:
314:
288:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
148:
388:
364:
261:
244:
53:
214:
71:
63:
310:
284:
254:
109:
384:
257:
240:
49:
358:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
400:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
213:
trim it, merge it and redirect it. You don't need an AfD.—
196:
would be more than adequate coverage of this non-building.
105:
101:
97:
167:
363:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
181:
194:List of tallest buildings and structures in London
304:list of Architecture-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
410:). No further edits should be made to this page.
336:. Happy to revisit if and when building starts.
8:
278:list of England-related deletion discussions
298:
272:
302:: This debate has been included in the
276:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
427:
393:17:09, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
373:00:01, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
346:06:52, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
319:23:20, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
293:23:20, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
266:15:23, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
249:15:21, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
232:14:30, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
204:13:38, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
403:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
332:will happen, so it's a
58:14:24, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
209:So why not do that?
338:Chris Neville-Smith
44:The result was
375:
321:
307:
295:
281:
418:
405:
362:
360:
308:
282:
229:
219:
186:
185:
171:
123:
113:
95:
34:
426:
425:
421:
420:
419:
417:
416:
415:
414:
408:deletion review
401:
353:
228:
225:
215:
128:
119:
86:
72:100 Bishopsgate
70:
67:
64:100 Bishopsgate
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
424:
422:
413:
412:
396:
395:
377:
376:
361:
350:
349:
348:
322:
296:
270:
269:
268:
234:
226:
198:Angus McLellan
189:
188:
125:
121:AfD statistics
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
423:
411:
409:
404:
398:
397:
394:
390:
386:
382:
379:
378:
374:
370:
366:
359:
357:
352:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
330:
326:
323:
320:
316:
312:
305:
301:
297:
294:
290:
286:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
252:
251:
250:
246:
242:
238:
235:
233:
230:
222:
220:
218:
212:
208:
207:
206:
205:
202:
199:
195:
184:
180:
177:
174:
170:
166:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
134:
131:
130:Find sources:
126:
122:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
402:
399:
380:
354:
328:
324:
299:
273:
236:
216:
190:
178:
172:
164:
157:
151:
145:
139:
129:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
365:Ron Ritzman
155:free images
334:WP:CRYSTAL
217:S Marshall
311:• Gene93k
285:• Gene93k
356:Relisted
116:View log
161:WP refs
149:scholar
89:protect
84:history
385:Jheald
329:Userfy
325:Delete
258:hydrox
241:hydrox
211:Boldly
201:(Talk)
133:Google
93:delete
50:Stifle
176:JSTOR
137:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
389:talk
381:Keep
369:talk
342:talk
315:talk
300:Note
289:talk
274:Note
262:talk
245:talk
237:Keep
227:Cont
169:FENS
143:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
327:or
309:--
283:--
183:TWL
118:•
114:– (
391:)
371:)
344:)
317:)
306:.
291:)
280:.
264:)
256:--
247:)
163:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
387:(
367:(
340:(
313:(
287:(
260:(
243:(
223:/
187:)
179:·
173:·
165:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
135:(
127:(
124:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.