562:. First, it is clear as discussed above that there is not any copyvio. In addition, nom's last sentence is simply--at best--inapplicable. As to notability, I agree with the majority of the editors who have commented on this page that sufficient notability has been evidenced. I also note (in accord with otherstuffexists, as a further observation) that we have thousands of lists of people from country x (or city y, or college z), which weren't even the results of polls -- just collections that random editors chose -- and this certainly has greater indicia of notability than such lists.
464:
398:
385:. Nominator is mistaken in this generic non-notability claim about articles whose topic is a list published elsewhere. If simply reproducing that list, it would indeed quite likely be a copyvio, and thereby a reason for speedy deletion. But that has no bearing on the issue of notability. There, the criterion is whether the topic of the article has received significant coverage in independent reliable sources. --
517:. While the list is of notable people, the list itself and the process is not particularly notable for its own encyclopaedic article, and the compiled list is a creation that would have its own intellectual property, and one should also consider the copyright implications. While others can reproduce it due to
567:
Also, I note that the strong majority of comments on the 2 dozen-odd AfDs that nom made of the same ilk are expressing keen disagreement with the parallel nominations. The AfDs, which are running concurrently with this one, can be found at most of the national poll results reflected
445:
list. And I don't know how much clearer I could have been that copyright issues were not considered as a factor in that close. No opinion one way or the other on this issue, but again, my close at that AFD should not be taken as any sort of ruling on an entire class of articles.
282:. As explained at length at the indicated AfD, there is obviously no copyvio at all. If there were, we would have to delete (and no press could reflect) the results of Academy Award polls, and Gallup Polls, and the like. The relevant Supreme Court case (
487:
as for the other similar nominations. It's not copyvio, as has been shown pretty thoroughly. As for the nom's argument, we have no such policy. If the list is cited elsewhere, it's notable under our ordinary guidelines.
161:
434:
to my close at the "greatest
Israelis" article being used as a precedent here. No blanket declaration about the inherent notability of such lists was made, or even implied, in my closing statement
341:. A list isn't notable just because it has famous people, but when news stories about famous people are regularly citing their position in this list years after the event, it certainly is.
359:
291:
299:
193:
295:
122:
155:
256:
95:
90:
99:
17:
82:
569:
319:
176:
143:
543:
and its progeny. The poll results are facts, not a creation of the pollster. People voted in the poll, not the pollster.--
238:) 08:43, 4 October 2011 (UTC) PS. I have addressed concerns relating to the lack of independent references in the article.
49:
346:
612:
36:
205:
412:
137:
611:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
342:
62:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
597:
581:
552:
532:
499:
479:
455:
424:
389:
374:
350:
331:
271:
247:
213:
64:
133:
209:
527:
475:
437:. There is no other policy or guideline that i am aware of that addresses such cases, so this AFD should
592:
183:
86:
222:- a major poll in its context, which received extensive publicity in the Welsh media at the time, eg.
577:
548:
451:
327:
267:
169:
53:
522:
471:
386:
370:
227:
149:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
521:
our reproduction should not allow that under our licence conditions and its reproduction. —
512:
78:
70:
573:
544:
447:
323:
263:
201:
417:
495:
243:
235:
366:
196:. List articles that simply reproduce lists published elsewhere are non-notable. —
116:
223:
197:
226:
Consistent with the polls held around the same time in other countries, eg.
408:
490:
239:
231:
286:, 111 S. Ct. 1282 (1991)) is set forth at the above-indicated AfD.
404:
I found mentions in the media, including the one Deb mentioned. →
298:; and note that copyvio wasn't even claimed in the failed Afd at
605:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
307:
I note, as well, that this appears to be part of a series of
292:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/100 greatest
Romanians
300:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/The
Greatest American
194:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/200 Greatest
Israelis
296:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/100 Greatest
Britons
539:
As to the copyvio point, that simply incorrect. As per
435:
112:
108:
104:
168:
360:
list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions
182:
470:. It's a good thermometer of opinion at the time.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
615:). No further edits should be made to this page.
284:Feist Publications v. Rural Telephone Service
8:
358:Note: This debate has been included in the
255:Note: This debate has been included in the
224:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/wales/3249020.stm
357:
257:list of Wales-related deletion discussions
254:
318:of the national poll results reflected
311:2 dozen AfDs today by the same nom, of
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
192:Non-notable, possibly copyvio. cf.
24:
462:
396:
1:
598:10:08, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
582:06:55, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
65:16:27, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
553:22:04, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
533:21:01, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
500:03:07, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
480:04:21, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
456:16:49, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
441:be about the notability of
425:07:01, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
390:05:57, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
375:18:45, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
351:17:13, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
332:15:12, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
290:(with the same conclusion)
272:13:42, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
248:11:46, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
214:08:16, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
632:
608:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
220:Keep/Oppose deletion
343:Chris Neville-Smith
44:The result was
423:
377:
363:
274:
260:
228:100 Great Britons
50:non-admin closure
623:
610:
595:
530:
516:
469:
466:
465:
422:
420:
415:
405:
403:
400:
399:
364:
261:
187:
186:
172:
120:
102:
79:100 Welsh Heroes
71:100 Welsh Heroes
60:
34:
631:
630:
626:
625:
624:
622:
621:
620:
619:
613:deletion review
606:
593:
526:
510:
509:& probably
467:
463:
418:
413:
406:
401:
397:
129:
93:
77:
74:
54:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
629:
627:
618:
617:
601:
600:
591:Useful list.♦
585:
584:
564:
563:
556:
555:
536:
535:
503:
502:
482:
459:
458:
428:
427:
393:
392:
379:
378:
354:
353:
335:
334:
304:
303:
276:
275:
251:
250:
198:Justin (koavf)
190:
189:
126:
73:
68:
57:Alpha_Quadrant
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
628:
616:
614:
609:
603:
602:
599:
596:
590:
587:
586:
583:
579:
575:
571:
566:
565:
561:
558:
557:
554:
550:
546:
542:
538:
537:
534:
531:
529:
524:
520:
514:
508:
505:
504:
501:
497:
493:
492:
486:
483:
481:
477:
473:
461:
460:
457:
453:
449:
444:
440:
436:
433:
430:
429:
426:
421:
416:
411:
410:
395:
394:
391:
388:
384:
381:
380:
376:
372:
368:
361:
356:
355:
352:
348:
344:
340:
337:
336:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
314:
310:
306:
305:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
278:
277:
273:
269:
265:
258:
253:
252:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
218:
217:
216:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
185:
181:
178:
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
135:
132:
131:Find sources:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
63:
61:
59:
58:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
607:
604:
588:
559:
540:
525:
523:billinghurst
518:
506:
489:
484:
472:Llywelyn2000
442:
438:
431:
407:
382:
338:
315:
312:
308:
287:
283:
279:
219:
191:
179:
173:
165:
158:
152:
146:
140:
130:
56:
55:
45:
43:
31:
28:
594:Dr. Blofeld
156:free images
574:Epeefleche
545:Epeefleche
448:Beeblebrox
324:Epeefleche
264:Tom Morris
367:• Gene93k
309:PRODs and
519:fair use
432:I object
288:See also
123:View log
528:sDrewth
513:copyvio
387:Lambiam
383:Comment
280:Comment
162:WP refs
150:scholar
96:protect
91:history
507:delete
134:Google
100:delete
541:Feist
496:talk
177:JSTOR
138:books
117:views
109:watch
105:links
16:<
589:Keep
578:talk
570:here
560:Keep
549:talk
485:Keep
476:talk
468:Keep
452:talk
443:this
439:only
402:Keep
371:talk
347:talk
339:Keep
328:talk
320:here
316:most
313:many
294:and
268:talk
244:talk
236:talk
170:FENS
144:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
46:keep
572:.--
491:DGG
322:.--
240:Deb
232:Deb
184:TWL
121:– (
48:. (
580:)
551:)
515:}}
511:{{
498:)
478:)
454:)
419:☭
373:)
365:—
362:.
349:)
330:)
270:)
259:.
246:)
230:.
212:☯
164:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
52:)
576:(
547:(
494:(
474:(
450:(
414:⚑
409:Σ
369:(
345:(
326:(
302:.
266:(
262:—
242:(
234:(
210:M
208:☺
206:C
204:☮
202:T
200:❤
188:)
180:·
174:·
166:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
136:(
128:(
125:)
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.