496:. Votes in AfDs should be based on the merits of the subject of the article, not opinions on the validity of the nomination. While in this case bold change to redirect was considered, it does not hurt Knowledge (XXG) to allow for a formal discussion at AfD. While I too would like if these were all together, I am certain that if they were, editors would not check every single one and would only look at a few randomly in determining their notability (which is understandable given there are thousands, I suppose). At least one of the individual noms resulted in keep, and that is the goal here. Weed out the unimportant ones, keep the few that are notable.
351:, there have been ongoing discussions about these asteroids since 2012, particularly insisting on discussions (not unilateral redirects) for those numbered below 2000 (as this one is). This doesn't indicate that all below 2000 are notable, but that they should be looked at carefully. Because of the extensive discussions about this, the ATD is not to just unilaterally redirect. There was an AfD on multiple asteroids recently, which was withdrawn because they are different and need to be assessed individually, especially as this is an area not many people have knowledge of - hence them sitting in
318:. The generic nature of the nomination is further apparent in its vague suggestion that we "delete / redirect". Which is it then? Deletion is a severe and specific process which removes the edit history, attribution, talk page and all related detail. Redirection is a comparatively benign process which
500:
says "A single paper is not enough to establish notability for most objects. Being mentioned alongside other similar objects, such as in a table of properties of 200 newly discovered supernovae, does not constitute non-trivial coverage; the paper needs to have significant commentary on the object."
355:
for over 3 years and the numerous discussions on the
Wikiproject and other venues. The nomination may be the same, but the asteroids aren't. Delete / redirect is not intended in any way to be generic, just that I would be happy with either option. NASTRO and ATD would suggest redirect. Hopefully
252:.... Yeah problem is it doesn't exist so I've had to rollback every single closure I made - I assumed the nom had checked this before adding it above but clearly not .... So not wise to redirect these unless ofcourse you have time to waste!. –
330:
process not being followed when the nomination is exactly the same in every case? The deletion process is being abused and so these nominations should be speedily terminated to avoid wasting the community's time.
174:
525:; insufficient sources found to demonstrate notability. I would add that it would be good if you could limit these to, say, ten per day. The number is getting decidedly unwieldy at this point.
294:
There are a large number of nominations like this, all with the same cookie-cutter text. Let's consider this one as a test case. Firstly, the nomination claims that the subject doesn't pass
446:
127:
406:- Inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) requires notability. Just because the object is listed among other objects on a document does not mean it is notable, much less meet
168:
356:
these AfDs will save editors' time - the different editors starting discussions in different
Wikiprojects etc., and allow us to resolve the 3 year issue finally.
298:. This claim seems to be false, because the Google Scholar link indicates that there have been specific detailed studies of this object such as
134:
469:
217:
17:
592:: It is a LARGE Mars-crossing asteroid and not one of the thousands of meaningless main-belt asteroid stubs created by a bot. --
322:
all this and may be done by ordinary editing. If redirection is a good idea, why has the nominator not tried this first, per
100:
95:
665:
104:
189:
381:
without doing any kind of background check yourself. NASTRO makes it clear that re-direct or keep are the only options.
688:
156:
40:
87:
249:
564:
336:
661:
547:
150:
382:
306:
in which the spectrum of this object has been analysed in detail. This is given as a specific example in
684:
530:
36:
497:
477:
407:
327:
319:
146:
669:
644:
626:
601:
583:
551:
534:
513:
457:
437:
419:
394:
365:
340:
285:
265:
237:
69:
568:
487:
348:
332:
543:
182:
56:. Feel free to start discussion whether the article should be redirected on the article talk page.
610:
473:
315:
311:
295:
206:
196:
579:
509:
451:
276:, I'm really sorry about that, all at AfD now being amended, will all be correct within 15 mins.
62:
378:
656:: Being only the 20th discovered Mars crosser asteroid, it deserves a redirect only as much as
640:
597:
433:
390:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
683:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
522:
307:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
622:
526:
415:
361:
281:
233:
225:
614:
493:
481:
323:
210:
91:
326:? And why do we have to go through this in dozens of separate discussions. Why is the
162:
273:
253:
573:
503:
299:
57:
303:
636:
593:
429:
386:
121:
657:
618:
560:
411:
357:
277:
229:
221:
83:
75:
635:
As a Mars crosser, the asteroid is notable for its ~10km diameter alone. --
385:. You are more interested in CAT:NN then improving astronomical content. --
52:. Consensus against deletion is clear. As for the redirecting, there is
314:. Nothing is said about this in the nomination which therefore fails
352:
677:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
248:- I originally closed most on this log (2 May) as redirect to
609:
How does it being a Mars-crossing asteroid mean it meets
117:
113:
109:
181:
195:
310:and so indicates that the object actually passes
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
691:). No further edits should be made to this page.
542:. Nothing of interest found on Google scholar. —
565:Knowledge (XXG):Notifications#Triggering_events
8:
447:list of Science-related deletion discussions
445:Note: This debate has been included in the
444:
377:: Boleyn, you seem to be trying to make a
428:Deletion is not an option per NASTRO. --
408:astronomical object notability criteria
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
571:, see response above from Boleyn. ―
213:; delete / redirect per NASTRO to
24:
470:List of minor planets: 1001–2000
218:List of minor planets: 1001–2000
250:List of minor planets 1000-2000
215:List of minor planets 1000-2000
1:
708:
228:) 08:11, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
680:Please do not modify it.
670:14:58, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
70:18:13, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
645:12:29, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
627:20:12, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
602:16:28, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
584:23:12, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
559:Fixing broken ping for
552:18:19, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
535:17:01, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
514:15:26, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
458:13:52, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
438:12:29, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
420:12:07, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
395:16:36, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
366:11:48, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
341:10:57, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
286:06:44, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
266:00:56, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
238:08:11, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
246:Non admin closure note
662:exoplanetaryscience
383:AFD is not cleanup
586:
563:, details here: (
460:
67:
699:
682:
582:
576:
558:
512:
506:
492:, please follow
491:
454:
452:
263:
258:
200:
199:
185:
137:
125:
107:
63:
60:
34:
707:
706:
702:
701:
700:
698:
697:
696:
695:
689:deletion review
678:
574:
572:
569:Andrew Davidson
504:
502:
488:Andrew Davidson
485:
349:Andrew Davidson
259:
254:
142:
133:
98:
82:
79:
66:
58:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
705:
703:
694:
693:
673:
672:
650:
649:
648:
647:
630:
629:
604:
587:
567:) Here ya go:
555:
554:
544:David Eppstein
537:
516:
476:(specifically
462:
461:
442:
441:
440:
423:
422:
400:
399:
398:
397:
369:
368:
343:
271:
270:
269:
268:
203:
202:
139:
78:
73:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
704:
692:
690:
686:
681:
675:
674:
671:
667:
663:
659:
655:
652:
651:
646:
642:
638:
634:
633:
632:
631:
628:
624:
620:
616:
612:
608:
605:
603:
599:
595:
591:
588:
585:
581:
577:
570:
566:
562:
557:
556:
553:
549:
545:
541:
538:
536:
532:
528:
524:
520:
517:
515:
511:
507:
499:
495:
489:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
464:
463:
459:
456:
455:
453:Esquivalience
448:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
426:
425:
424:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
402:
401:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
373:
372:
371:
370:
367:
363:
359:
354:
350:
347:
344:
342:
338:
334:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
290:
289:
288:
287:
283:
279:
275:
267:
264:
262:
257:
251:
247:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
216:
212:
208:
205:Doesn't meet
198:
194:
191:
188:
184:
180:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:Find sources:
140:
136:
132:
129:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
77:
74:
72:
71:
68:
61:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
679:
676:
653:
606:
589:
539:
518:
465:
450:
403:
374:
345:
291:
272:
260:
255:
245:
214:
204:
192:
186:
178:
171:
165:
159:
153:
143:
130:
54:No Consensus
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
658:20 Massalia
527:Praemonitus
498:WP:NASTCRIT
478:WP:NASTCRIT
328:WP:MULTIAFD
292:Speedy Keep
169:free images
84:1316 Kasan
76:1316 Kasan
685:talk page
611:WP:NASTRO
474:WP:NASTRO
333:Andrew D.
320:preserves
316:WP:BEFORE
312:WP:NASTRO
296:WP:NASTRO
274:Davey2010
207:WP:NASTRO
37:talk page
687:or in a
575:Padenton
540:Redirect
519:Redirect
505:Padenton
484:. Also,
466:Redirect
379:wp:point
128:View log
39:or in a
637:Kheider
607:Comment
594:Kheider
523:WP:DWMP
430:Kheider
387:Kheider
375:Comment
346:Comment
308:WP:DWMP
175:WP refs
163:scholar
101:protect
96:history
619:Boleyn
615:WP:GNG
561:Boleyn
494:WP:AGF
482:WP:GNG
480:) and
412:Rpclod
404:Delete
358:Boleyn
353:CAT:NN
324:WP:ATD
278:Boleyn
230:Boleyn
222:Boleyn
211:WP:GNG
147:Google
105:delete
256:Davey
190:JSTOR
151:books
135:Stats
122:views
114:watch
110:links
59:Monty
16:<
666:talk
654:Keep
641:talk
623:talk
598:talk
590:Keep
548:talk
531:talk
521:per
472:per
434:talk
416:talk
391:talk
362:talk
337:talk
304:that
302:and
300:this
282:talk
261:2010
234:talk
226:talk
183:FENS
157:news
118:logs
92:talk
88:edit
50:keep
613:or
468:to
410:.--
209:or
197:TWL
126:– (
65:845
668:)
660:.
643:)
625:)
617:?
600:)
550:)
533:)
449:.
436:)
418:)
393:)
364:)
339:)
284:)
236:)
220:.
177:)
120:|
116:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
664:(
639:(
621:(
596:(
580:✉
578:|
546:(
529:(
510:✉
508:|
501:―
490::
486:@
432:(
414:(
389:(
360:(
335:(
280:(
232:(
224:(
201:)
193:·
187:·
179:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
149:(
141:(
138:)
131:·
124:)
86:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.