418:
567:
629:– if these articles don't belong in an encyclopedia, I don't know what does. Obviously these articles need some work. The 70s article is written like an article while the 90s and 00s are much more like lists. Since there are already yearly lists, I think it would make sense to convert the 90s and 00s lists into articles that highlight the decade's achievements.
361:. Insofar as this series (including the missing decades) could be cleaned up by someone who cares enough to do so, there is no impending need to delete them before that happens. It would be best to leave a work in progress like this around, and there is no impending need to delete these articles. --
515:- Subject matter notability should be obvious. I would have simply closed per DGG but I haven't closed any AFDs before. It doesn't require an admin to see the obviousness of the result, so any regular editor so inclined should feel free to close this.
454:– Yes, these articles are not in the best of condition. But it's important to have a big picture overview of overall historical trends and influences in these fields, which this type of article can provide. Perhaps then we should have a
280:
84:
404:
Justin Bieber
Twitter account gets its own article and an article about science and technology deemed unencyclopedic. Astounding!!! This could be summarised as a decade.. The article has massive potential!♦
433:
all three. The decade articles should provide overviews of the year articles, and both the decade and year articles encourage readers to browse the encyclopedia. Ideally individual articles like
357:
As subject matter for articles, these are all reasonable navigational aids and overviews for the more specific per-year articles. That the current text is inadequate is irrelevnt since
274:
612:– We obviously encourage redundancy in navigation, and this is a form of it. Just because it's not in good shape right now doesn't mean it's deleteable. AfD is not for cleanup. -
437:
would link back to the year or decade. What else happened in 1977? In the 1970s? Yes, the text needs to be cleaned up and sources added. That will not be achieved by deletion.
670:
143:
92:
219:
214:
173:
168:
116:
111:
79:
223:
177:
120:
647:
206:
160:
148:
103:
315:
after merging useful content to the appropriate year in science article. There are only three in this series. They are going nowhere and can be covered elsewhere. --
582:
295:
262:
210:
164:
107:
390:
324:
526:
17:
685:
662:
638:
621:
604:
550:
531:
507:
488:
469:
446:
411:
394:
376:
349:
328:
63:
455:
340:(or another target), and then add attribution in the respective year articles pointing back to the edit history of the redirect.
256:
477:
The 70s science and technology was very important, the moon buggy, last moon walk etc. These decades could easily be expanded!
202:
156:
99:
69:
336:
Delete and merge is impossible given licensing requirements. To do what you want to achieve, you'd have to redirect these to
252:
705:
302:
40:
537:
268:
386:
320:
521:
345:
496:-- If it weren't that I'm getting too angry at the nom for this sort of disruption, I'd just do it.
701:
600:
545:
406:
36:
595:
I fail to see how the last three decades of technological advancement would not be considered notable.
288:
442:
382:
369:
316:
566:
589:
Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.
681:
658:
617:
516:
341:
59:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
700:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
50:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
634:
596:
483:
463:
417:
503:
438:
381:
Note that deletion is not permanent. How about putting them in project namespace? --
362:
677:
654:
613:
55:
240:
194:
137:
630:
478:
459:
434:
498:
422:
337:
694:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
458:
article instead of the 1970s and 1990s articles? Regards,
236:
232:
228:
190:
186:
182:
133:
129:
125:
287:
85:
Articles for deletion/1970s in science and technology
301:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
708:). No further edits should be made to this page.
671:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
8:
669:Note: This debate has been included in the
648:list of Science-related deletion discussions
646:Note: This debate has been included in the
542:– per criteria #1 at the speedy keep page.
456:Twentieth century in science and technology
421:Demonstration of science and technology in
668:
645:
416:
77:
359:deletion is not a valid cleanup method
80:Articles for deletion/1970s in science
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
76:
24:
565:
203:2000s in science and technology
157:1990s in science and technology
100:1970s in science and technology
70:1970s in science and technology
1:
725:
686:18:15, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
663:18:15, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
639:21:40, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
622:18:01, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
605:11:05, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
551:22:09, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
532:18:51, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
508:18:39, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
489:18:03, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
470:16:21, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
447:14:34, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
412:14:19, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
395:04:49, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
377:04:43, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
350:04:33, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
329:04:27, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
697:Please do not modify it.
583:whacked with a wet trout
32:Please do not modify it.
64:17:32, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
426:
75:AfDs for this article:
420:
540:all three articles
427:
48:The result was
688:
674:
665:
651:
594:
593:
590:
549:
529:
524:
716:
699:
675:
652:
588:
569:
562:
561:
548:
546:Northamerica1000
543:
527:
522:
519:
486:
481:
409:
402:Very strong keep
372:
365:
306:
305:
291:
244:
226:
198:
180:
151:
141:
123:
34:
724:
723:
719:
718:
717:
715:
714:
713:
712:
706:deletion review
695:
544:
517:
484:
479:
407:
370:
363:
248:
217:
201:
171:
155:
147:
114:
98:
90:
73:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
722:
720:
711:
710:
690:
689:
666:
642:
641:
627:Avalanche keep
624:
592:
591:
570:
560:
559:
553:
534:
510:
491:
472:
449:
415:
414:
399:
398:
397:
352:
331:
309:
308:
245:
199:
153:
89:
88:
87:
82:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
721:
709:
707:
703:
698:
692:
691:
687:
683:
679:
672:
667:
664:
660:
656:
649:
644:
643:
640:
636:
632:
628:
625:
623:
619:
615:
611:
608:
607:
606:
602:
598:
587:
586:
584:
578:
577:
576:
571:
568:
564:
563:
557:
554:
552:
547:
541:
539:
535:
533:
530:
525:
520:
514:
511:
509:
505:
501:
500:
495:
492:
490:
487:
482:
476:
473:
471:
467:
466:
461:
457:
453:
450:
448:
444:
440:
436:
432:
429:
428:
424:
419:
413:
410:
403:
400:
396:
392:
388:
384:
383:Alan Liefting
380:
379:
378:
375:
374:
373:
366:
360:
356:
353:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
332:
330:
326:
322:
318:
317:Alan Liefting
314:
311:
310:
304:
300:
297:
294:
290:
286:
282:
279:
276:
273:
270:
267:
264:
261:
258:
254:
251:
250:Find sources:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
225:
221:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
184:
179:
175:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
145:
139:
135:
131:
127:
122:
118:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
96:
95:
94:
86:
83:
81:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
57:
53:
52:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
696:
693:
626:
609:
581:You've been
580:
579:
574:
573:
572:
555:
536:
518:Dennis Brown
512:
497:
493:
474:
464:
451:
430:
401:
368:
367:
358:
354:
342:Calliopejen1
333:
312:
298:
292:
284:
277:
271:
265:
259:
249:
91:
49:
47:
31:
28:
597:Smallman12q
556:Speedy Keep
538:Speedy keep
408:Dr. Blofeld
275:free images
702:talk page
610:SNOW keep
513:Snow keep
494:SNOW keep
435:Voyager 1
51:snow keep
37:talk page
704:or in a
439:Aymatth2
391:contribs
325:contribs
144:View log
93:View log
39:or in a
678:Frankie
655:Frankie
614:Jorgath
452:Comment
334:Comment
281:WP refs
269:scholar
220:protect
215:history
174:protect
169:history
117:protect
112:history
56:Bearian
631:Boghog
575:Whack!
485:(talk)
480:Jaguar
425:, 1977
423:Oxford
364:Jayron
313:Delete
253:Google
224:delete
178:delete
121:delete
504:talk
338:1970s
296:JSTOR
257:books
241:views
233:watch
229:links
195:views
187:watch
183:links
149:Stats
138:views
130:watch
126:links
16:<
682:talk
659:talk
635:talk
618:talk
601:talk
475:Keep
465:talk
443:talk
431:Keep
387:talk
355:Keep
346:talk
321:talk
289:FENS
263:news
237:logs
211:talk
207:edit
191:logs
165:talk
161:edit
134:logs
108:talk
104:edit
60:talk
620:)
499:DGG
460:RJH
303:TWL
146:•
142:– (
684:)
676:—
673:.
661:)
653:—
650:.
637:)
603:)
523:2¢
506:)
468:)
445:)
393:)
389:-
371:32
348:)
327:)
323:-
283:)
239:|
235:|
231:|
227:|
222:|
218:|
213:|
209:|
193:|
189:|
185:|
181:|
176:|
172:|
167:|
163:|
136:|
132:|
128:|
124:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
62:)
54:.
680:(
657:(
633:(
616:(
599:(
585:.
558:-
528:©
502:(
462:(
441:(
385:(
344:(
319:(
307:)
299:·
293:·
285:·
278:·
272:·
266:·
260:·
255:(
247:(
243:)
205:(
197:)
159:(
152:)
140:)
102:(
58:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.