909:
Showing a historic list of every show ever shown on a notable network, is perfectly fine by almanac standards for the
Knowledge (XXG). Television plays a massive role in shaping people's opinions, and affecting the world. If someone wanted to see where and when shows were at, and then do a study to
669:
instead of making a directory of old TV Guides? Even an old TV Guide has no historical significance. What you guys are saying is that old TV Guides from 2008 and below are historically significant without explaining how it is. Whenever anyone posts links, it always shows notability for television and
825:
or at least rename - Australia did not have a single national network schedule in the 80s or earlier - each state had it's own schedule. Also, summer schedule vs ratings periods vs sports events all made it change. This at best could be a snapshot of a single week in a single city, and without any
780:
per Norton and
Mandsford. Useful organizational and navigational device, and notable in its own right, since scheduling choices strongly affect ratings, and are covered in broadcasting textbooks and history of broadcasting. Not a copyright violation, and consistent with
843:
That there was no single national schedule does not mean we cannot bring the schedules together into a basic schedule. If it is desired to do regional ones, for more detail, this would be possible also. I';ve made a comment elsewhere about the irrelevance of
733:
729:
721:
717:
166:
622:
but this has been taken to mean that every historical program schedule is historically significant in each of four time slots and I just don't see that. Certainly a big promotion like NBC's "Must See TV" deserves space, but every listing? That's trivia.
584:
per WP:NOTDIR, section 4, "Directories, directory entries, electronic program guide, or a resource for conducting business. For example, an article on a radio station should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, et cetera,
94:
89:
98:
491:
Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate collection of information, not train or bus schedules, not television schedules, not a telephone directory. It is absurd that anyone would try to keep this when it is so clearly
81:
391:
369:
160:
365:
587:
although mention of major events, promotions or historically significant programme lists and schedules (such as the annual United States network television schedules) may be acceptable.
127:
314:
589:" Perhaps Australian TV is not as significant as American TV (I never could pick it up even after I got that new antenna!), I think policy exceptions have to be considered.
285:
910:
determine how each one affected someone, this might be of use. It also shows how the taste of the people changed over time, what sort of thing they watched year by year.
181:
148:
977:
962:
shows that 21 editors feel these guides are unencyclopedic, ten think some are acceptable, and five think all such guides are appropriate for
Knowledge (XXG).
950:
933:
901:
880:
859:
835:
815:
794:
772:
745:
708:
679:
653:
632:
598:
576:
557:
535:
505:
483:
466:
449:
432:
407:
381:
355:
332:
303:
273:
253:
236:
218:
63:
142:
959:
138:
249:
757:(like the weather report), or it is unsourced. Could it survive on Wikisource? Probably not, since TV Guide and the like have that pesky © symbol.
188:
85:
77:
69:
245:
154:
17:
59:
994:
641:
programme lists and schedules" - I fail to see how this schedule is historically significant. Please prove me wrong. --
36:
52:
546:
993:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
619:
531:
244:
Its not a directory, its a just a novel navigation device. We have the same for US television and radio. --
574:
349:
615:
474:
Are we really questioning this its really easy Delete. A Tv
Schedule from 1982 does not need an article--
876:
525:
812:
650:
501:
429:
329:
300:
270:
972:
898:
767:
704:
675:
666:
594:
445:
403:
214:
206:
174:
868:
521:
417:
831:
479:
567:
343:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
946:
911:
872:
845:
790:
553:
496:. Administrators ought to be able to delete stuff like this with without it coming to AFD.
799:
Scheduling choices generally perhaps, but this schedule specifically? What makes this one "
782:
734:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/2009 Australian network television schedule (weekday)
730:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/1990 Australian network television schedule (weekday)
726:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/1982 Australian network television schedule (weekday)
722:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/1958 Australian network television schedule (weekday)
718:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/1957 Australian network television schedule (weekday)
493:
387:
258:
198:
804:
642:
497:
462:
421:
321:
292:
262:
964:
895:
759:
754:
700:
671:
590:
441:
399:
377:
210:
202:
890:
855:
827:
741:
628:
475:
232:
201:, particularly "Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate collection of information".
115:
942:
786:
549:
753:. Either this is a copy (not an encyclopedic treatment, but just a copy) of a
458:
341:- Per Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ). Pure deletionist copyright paranoia. -
373:
364:. An interesting historical artefact, consistent with existing articles at
693:
Wife: The TV Guide is historically significant now that it's a year after.
850:
737:
624:
565:- Indiscriminate info, unsuitable for inclusion within an encyclopedia. –
228:
699:
Wife: Get my mom's old TV Guides from the attic and type those up also!
987:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
665:: If television schedules are so important why not create
960:
Wikipedia_talk:What_Wikipedia_is_not#The_consensus_so_far
420:; what makes this schedule historically significant? --
122:
111:
107:
103:
173:
684:
Husband: I'm going to throw away last years TV Guide.
78:
1982 Australian network television schedule (weekday)
70:
1982 Australian network television schedule (weekday)
696:
Husband: Okay. I'll type this up on
Knowledge (XXG).
366:
United States primetime network television schedules
48:. The deletion votes were stronger than the keeps.
187:
418:Knowledge (XXG) is not an electronic program guide
716:: Please consider together the related open AfDs
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
997:). No further edits should be made to this page.
614:is quite a weasel-word in a policy. I see that
315:list of Television-related deletion discussions
888:unless sources are provided as to why this is
286:list of Australia-related deletion discussions
826:references, makes it completely unverifiable.
8:
440:: A television schedule on an enyclopedia?
687:Wife: Don't! Copy it onto Knowledge (XXG)!
309:
280:
313:: This debate has been included in the
284:: This debate has been included in the
610:this is clearly on point, but the word
941:, Knowledge (XXG) is not a TV guide.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
670:not the individual old TV Guides.
24:
637:Note the important qualifier: "
246:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
209:) 02:20, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
1:
370:survived deletion discussion
978:21:57, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
951:10:51, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
934:16:53, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
902:11:25, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
881:04:51, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
860:06:14, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
836:06:18, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
816:06:24, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
803:" as required by WP:NOT? --
795:17:15, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
773:02:58, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
746:02:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
709:00:44, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
680:00:33, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
654:00:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
633:23:23, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
599:22:05, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
577:16:58, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
558:16:17, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
536:13:25, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
506:11:36, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
484:11:22, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
467:07:17, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
450:05:35, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
433:04:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
408:04:44, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
382:04:44, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
356:03:36, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
333:03:25, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
304:03:25, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
274:04:33, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
254:03:17, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
237:02:50, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
219:02:20, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
64:00:35, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
1014:
618:and perhaps even how it's
398:- it is hardly relevant.
990:Please do not modify it.
958:a related discussion at
891:Historically significant
801:historically significant
639:historically significant
32:Please do not modify it.
512:Nice looking article,
53:Backslash Forwardslash
714:Note to closing admin
394:you mentioned was in
261:should be avoided. --
227:this directory info.
667:television schedule
44:The result was
545:Ironclad case of
358:
335:
318:
306:
289:
1005:
992:
976:
969:
930:
927:
924:
921:
918:
915:
846:Harry and Louise
810:
771:
764:
648:
570:
539:
427:
352:
346:
342:
327:
319:
298:
290:
268:
192:
191:
177:
125:
119:
101:
34:
1013:
1012:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
995:deletion review
988:
965:
963:
928:
925:
922:
919:
916:
913:
808:
760:
758:
646:
568:
547:WP:NOTDIRECTORY
529:
425:
392:deletion debate
350:
344:
325:
296:
266:
134:
121:
92:
76:
73:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1011:
1009:
1000:
999:
983:
982:
981:
980:
936:
904:
883:
862:
838:
820:
819:
818:
775:
755:primary source
748:
711:
697:
694:
691:
688:
685:
682:
659:
658:
657:
656:
635:
620:WP:INTERESTING
602:
601:
579:
560:
540:
534:comment added
509:
508:
486:
469:
452:
435:
412:
411:
410:
359:
336:
307:
278:
277:
276:
239:
195:
194:
131:
72:
67:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1010:
998:
996:
991:
985:
984:
979:
974:
970:
968:
961:
957:
954:
953:
952:
948:
944:
940:
937:
935:
932:
931:
908:
905:
903:
900:
897:
893:
892:
887:
884:
882:
878:
874:
870:
866:
863:
861:
857:
853:
852:
848:arguments.
847:
842:
839:
837:
833:
829:
824:
821:
817:
814:
811:
807:
802:
798:
797:
796:
792:
788:
784:
779:
776:
774:
769:
765:
763:
756:
752:
749:
747:
743:
739:
735:
731:
727:
723:
719:
715:
712:
710:
706:
702:
698:
695:
692:
690:Husband: Why?
689:
686:
683:
681:
677:
673:
668:
664:
661:
660:
655:
652:
649:
645:
640:
636:
634:
630:
626:
621:
617:
613:
609:
606:
605:
604:
603:
600:
596:
592:
588:
583:
580:
578:
575:
572:
571:
564:
561:
559:
555:
551:
548:
544:
541:
537:
533:
527:
523:
519:
515:
511:
510:
507:
503:
499:
495:
490:
487:
485:
481:
477:
473:
472:Strong Delete
470:
468:
464:
460:
456:
453:
451:
447:
443:
439:
436:
434:
431:
428:
424:
419:
416:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
384:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
360:
357:
353:
347:
340:
337:
334:
331:
328:
324:
316:
312:
308:
305:
302:
299:
295:
287:
283:
279:
275:
272:
269:
265:
260:
257:
256:
255:
251:
247:
243:
240:
238:
234:
230:
226:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
129:
124:
117:
113:
109:
105:
100:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
75:
74:
71:
68:
66:
65:
61:
57:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
989:
986:
966:
955:
938:
912:
906:
889:
885:
864:
849:
840:
822:
805:
800:
777:
761:
750:
725:
713:
662:
643:
638:
616:WP:ITSUSEFUL
611:
607:
586:
581:
569:Juliancolton
566:
562:
542:
517:
516:to at least
513:
488:
471:
454:
437:
422:
414:
395:
361:
345:NeutralHomer
338:
322:
310:
293:
281:
263:
241:
224:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
55:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
873:Niteshift36
530:—Preceding
339:Speedy Keep
161:free images
498:Drawn Some
973:reasoning
967:Abductive
869:WP:NOTDIR
768:reasoning
762:Abductive
701:Joe Chill
672:Joe Chill
591:Mandsford
518:somewhere
514:transwiki
442:Joe Chill
400:Ironholds
211:Ironholds
203:Ironholds
828:The-Pope
476:Dcheagle
197:classic
128:View log
956:Comment
663:Comment
608:Comment
532:undated
522:Dr. Eme
167:WP refs
155:scholar
95:protect
90:history
943:Stifle
939:Delete
886:Delete
865:Delete
823:Delete
813:(talk)
787:Edison
783:WP:NOT
751:Delete
651:(talk)
563:Delete
550:Mangoe
543:DELETE
494:WP:NOT
489:Delete
455:Delete
438:Delete
430:(talk)
415:Delete
390:. The
388:WP:WAX
368:which
330:(talk)
301:(talk)
271:(talk)
259:WP:WAX
225:Delete
199:WP:NOT
139:Google
123:delete
99:delete
46:delete
929:Focus
899:garra
856:talk
809:cobra
806:Cyber
647:cobra
644:Cyber
459:Kevin
426:cobra
423:Cyber
326:cobra
323:Cyber
297:cobra
294:Cyber
267:cobra
264:Cyber
182:JSTOR
143:books
126:) – (
116:views
108:watch
104:links
16:<
947:talk
907:Keep
896:Gnan
877:talk
841:Keep
832:talk
791:talk
778:Keep
742:talk
705:talk
676:talk
629:talk
595:talk
582:Keep
554:talk
526:talk
502:talk
480:talk
463:talk
446:talk
404:talk
396:2007
386:See
378:talk
374:WWGB
362:Keep
351:Talk
311:Note
282:Note
250:talk
242:Keep
233:talk
215:talk
207:talk
175:FENS
149:news
112:logs
86:talk
82:edit
60:talk
851:DGG
738:JJL
625:JJL
612:may
528:)
320:--
291:--
229:JJL
189:TWL
949:)
894:,
879:)
871:.
867:.
858:)
834:)
793:)
785:.
744:)
736:.
732:,
728:,
724:,
720:,
707:)
678:)
631:)
597:)
573:|
556:)
520:.
504:)
482:)
465:)
457:.
448:)
406:)
380:)
372:.
354:•
348:•
317:.
288:.
252:)
235:)
217:)
169:)
114:|
110:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
62:)
975:)
971:(
945:(
926:m
923:a
920:e
917:r
914:D
875:(
854:(
830:(
789:(
770:)
766:(
740:(
703:(
674:(
627:(
593:(
552:(
538:.
524:(
500:(
478:(
461:(
444:(
402:(
376:(
248:(
231:(
213:(
205:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
120:(
118:)
80:(
58:(
56:/
50:\
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.