216:
who stated "prod removed, WP:GNG already checked, and unreasonable request ignored." Not sure which part of my request was unreasonable, but I think that editor needs to read up on GNG. This spammy software article that Graeme approved at AfC is not supported by any reliable sources. It has three
280:
story is pretty good (yes it's a newspaper) as GoEMerchant seems to have made the 1stPayPOS product. (It should be pretty obviously from the picture in the free preview, incidentally.) However, that is pretty much it as far as good sources go. It is possible GoEMerchant is notable, so one
217:
badly formatted footnotes, and a list of external links, to 1) a local radio station - 404, 2) a local newspaper (?) - article available after payment, visible part doesn't mention the company 3) an article in a digital magazine that seems self-published (
259:. I can't find any evidence that this app is selling, that it has any customers, or that it has anything more than press releases going for it. Not even the parent company appears to meet our notability standards.
342:
The references have suffered some linkrot and paywalling in the last year. But the issuu.com references is substantial and independent enough. Last year there were three suitable references available. So the
169:
220:), 4) few more brief mentions on dubious-looking spammy websites, likely PR/self-published pieces. We require reliable sources showing significant coverage, not links to few websites and promo pieces.
52:. Graeme, the issuu reference you linked is a tradeshow handout which is generally a paid advertisement for the company in question. As there are no other independent references, this article is
208:
requirement.". I also requested that "If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and
122:
319:
299:
163:
281:
possibility is to rework this into an article about them, but the 1stPayPOS product doesn't appear to have sufficient notability for a stand-alone article. --
200:
I prodded this with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing
201:
129:
205:
17:
249:
95:
90:
184:
99:
375:
40:
151:
82:
352:
145:
371:
36:
141:
348:
247:
213:
356:
331:
311:
290:
268:
251:
232:
86:
64:
286:
177:
191:
78:
70:
327:
307:
226:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
370:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
209:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
264:
344:
242:
282:
157:
323:
303:
222:
116:
260:
57:
347:
applied then. I will see if the decomposing references can be resurrected.
364:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
218:
112:
108:
104:
176:
241:- I found lots of press releases but nothing else.
190:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
378:). No further edits should be made to this page.
320:list of Software-related deletion discussions
300:list of Business-related deletion discussions
8:
318:Note: This debate has been included in the
298:Note: This debate has been included in the
202:Knowledge (XXG):General notability guideline
317:
297:
223:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
206:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (software)
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
395:
252:09:45, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
233:08:01, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
357:22:33, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
332:00:14, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
312:00:14, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
291:21:52, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
269:02:02, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
212:." This was deprodded by
65:06:54, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
367:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
204:and the more detailed
214:User:Graeme Bartlett
48:The result was
334:
314:
386:
369:
229:
195:
194:
180:
132:
120:
102:
62:
34:
394:
393:
389:
388:
387:
385:
384:
383:
382:
376:deletion review
365:
349:Graeme Bartlett
231:
227:
137:
128:
93:
77:
74:
58:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
392:
390:
381:
380:
360:
359:
336:
335:
315:
294:
293:
271:
254:
221:
198:
197:
134:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
391:
379:
377:
373:
368:
362:
361:
358:
354:
350:
346:
341:
338:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
316:
313:
309:
305:
301:
296:
295:
292:
288:
284:
279:
275:
272:
270:
266:
262:
258:
255:
253:
250:
248:
246:
245:
240:
237:
236:
235:
234:
230:
224:
219:
215:
211:
207:
203:
193:
189:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
143:
140:
139:Find sources:
135:
131:
127:
124:
118:
114:
110:
106:
101:
97:
92:
88:
84:
80:
76:
75:
72:
69:
67:
66:
63:
61:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
366:
363:
339:
278:Courier Post
277:
273:
256:
243:
238:
210:ping me back
199:
187:
181:
173:
166:
160:
154:
148:
138:
125:
59:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
274:Weak delete
164:free images
244:Ritchie333
228:reply here
372:talk page
324:• Gene93k
304:• Gene93k
283:ThaddeusB
79:1stPayPOS
71:1stPayPOS
37:talk page
374:or in a
123:View log
39:or in a
170:WP refs
158:scholar
96:protect
91:history
54:deleted
345:WP:GNG
276:- the
261:Risker
257:Delete
239:Delete
142:Google
100:delete
50:delete
185:JSTOR
146:books
130:Stats
117:views
109:watch
105:links
60:Nakon
16:<
353:talk
340:Keep
328:talk
308:talk
287:talk
265:talk
178:FENS
152:news
113:logs
87:talk
83:edit
192:TWL
121:– (
355:)
330:)
322:.
310:)
302:.
289:)
267:)
172:)
115:|
111:|
107:|
103:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
56:.
351:(
326:(
306:(
285:(
263:(
225:|
196:)
188:·
182:·
174:·
167:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
144:(
136:(
133:)
126:·
119:)
81:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.