368:
I did have thoughts of tagging it for spam, but thought again as it didn't fully meet the requirements. There's always the possibility that it was intended as spam, but it looks well enough referenced - just about. There's quite a few refs, but some aren't exactly indicators of notability. The
416:
With the marketing section deleted by OSborn, this article is well sourced and has a NPOV. Seems mostly factual. The WIPO trademark dispute section certainly has significant notoriety and independent interest to the legal community - that is why I added to that section.
234:
Everything in this article is sourced by major news outlets. It is not slanted toward the company in any way and keeps a very neutral point of view. I don't see how this page would be considered any different than that of Woot!
154:
261:
Aside from what has already been written, several other editors have contributed to the article including an edition to the
Trademark Dispute section, which is a part of the notability of the article.
115:
344:
318:
148:
424:
291:
17:
287:
88:
83:
301:
169:
92:
480:
36:
136:
75:
479:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
459:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
428:
247:: Note that simply having a company or product as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion.
225:
420:
130:
401:
283:
266:
252:
53:
279:
262:
248:
126:
466:
432:
405:
378:
359:
333:
305:
270:
256:
244:
229:
197:
79:
57:
452:
193:
162:
443:
388:
176:
71:
63:
374:
355:
329:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
211:
186:
397:
49:
207:
189:
142:
370:
351:
325:
109:
297:
221:
214:, but some of the references given do hint at at least borderline notability.
446:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
391:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
243:, two similar sites to 1SaleADay.com. Please keep in mind the second half of
369:
wording is fairly NPOV. Should be OK so long as someone keeps an eye on it.
240:
216:
473:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
236:
105:
101:
97:
161:
451:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
396:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
175:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
483:). No further edits should be made to this page.
345:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
319:list of Business-related deletion discussions
8:
339:
313:
206:Article in its current form has loads of
343:: This debate has been included in the
317:: This debate has been included in the
185:Why This article does little more than
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
379:20:35, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
360:17:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
334:17:48, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
306:17:54, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
271:20:36, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
257:15:32, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
230:15:17, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
198:15:11, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
467:02:55, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
210:problems and runs a foul of
58:01:38, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
433:02:06, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
406:01:58, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
500:
476:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
302:contributionatoration
292:few or no other edits
294:outside this topic.
44:The result was
469:
423:comment added by
408:
362:
348:
336:
322:
308:
295:
228:
491:
478:
462:
450:
448:
435:
395:
393:
349:
323:
296:
277:
220:
180:
179:
165:
113:
95:
34:
499:
498:
494:
493:
492:
490:
489:
488:
487:
481:deletion review
474:
460:
441:
418:
386:
304:
122:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
497:
495:
486:
485:
470:
449:
438:
437:
436:
425:24.188.151.100
410:
409:
394:
383:
382:
381:
363:
337:
310:
309:
300:
274:
273:
259:
232:
183:
182:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
496:
484:
482:
477:
471:
468:
465:
463:
456:
455:
447:
445:
440:
439:
434:
430:
426:
422:
415:
412:
411:
407:
403:
399:
392:
390:
385:
384:
380:
376:
372:
367:
364:
361:
357:
353:
346:
342:
338:
335:
331:
327:
320:
316:
312:
311:
307:
303:
299:
293:
289:
285:
281:
276:
275:
272:
268:
264:
260:
258:
254:
250:
246:
242:
238:
233:
231:
227:
223:
219:
218:
213:
209:
205:
202:
201:
200:
199:
195:
191:
188:
178:
174:
171:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
132:
128:
125:
124:Find sources:
120:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
475:
472:
457:
453:
442:
413:
387:
365:
340:
314:
215:
203:
184:
172:
166:
158:
151:
145:
139:
133:
123:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
419:—Preceding
398:Ron Ritzman
290:) has made
280:Mordechai10
263:Mordechai10
249:Mordechai10
239:or Groupon
149:free images
50:Ron Ritzman
352:• Gene93k
326:• Gene93k
204:Weak Keep
190:H66666666
72:1saleaday
64:1saleaday
444:Relisted
421:unsigned
389:Relisted
288:contribs
226:says two
222:says you
116:View log
414:Comment
371:Peridon
366:Comment
241:Groupon
212:WP:SPAM
187:promote
155:WP refs
143:scholar
89:protect
84:history
298:OSborn
127:Google
93:delete
170:JSTOR
131:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
461:Talk
429:talk
402:talk
375:talk
356:talk
341:Note
330:talk
315:Note
284:talk
267:talk
253:talk
237:Woot
194:talk
163:FENS
137:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
350:--
324:--
245:G11
208:POV
177:TWL
114:– (
454:NW
431:)
404:)
377:)
358:)
347:.
332:)
321:.
286:•
278:—
269:)
255:)
224:,
196:)
157:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
464:)
458:(
427:(
400:(
373:(
354:(
328:(
282:(
265:(
251:(
217:2
192:(
181:)
173:·
167:·
159:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
134:·
129:(
121:(
118:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.