295:
Notability in accidents should not be a simple body count. Was there anything about this accident that was special? No, the driver just forgot to look. So while tragic, this accident is simply news, and not worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
89:
84:
93:
76:
122:
172:
while very sad, it is just an accident, there is nothing more to say about it, WP is not news, also articles don't exist for the sake of lists, but the other way around.
305:
285:
267:
248:
227:
208:
181:
164:
142:
58:
218:
one of hundreds of similar accidents none of which have been notable enough for a wikipedia article this one appears to be no different.
17:
256:
A train collision killing 9 people is enough for notability. If we have hundreds of others to write also, we should do them also .
152:
80:
72:
64:
320:
36:
272:
A train collision killing 9 people is enough for notability if reliable sources can be found that don't fall foul of
319:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
245:
177:
223:
281:
138:
160:
242:
238:
173:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
219:
273:
130:
301:
277:
201:
134:
263:
156:
191:
per above; "It helps the list look better" is a terrible reason to keep an article.
110:
49:
297:
194:
151:- this article is worth keeping because it adds to the examples listed in
258:
313:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
117:
106:
102:
98:
276:. "Other stuff exists" is not a valid AfD argument.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
323:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
73:2005 Johannesburg bus-train collision
65:2005 Johannesburg bus-train collision
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
153:List of level crossing accidents
129:non-notable event; delete per
1:
340:
286:18:20, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
268:18:19, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
249:23:33, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
228:21:31, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
209:07:20, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
182:05:01, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
165:02:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
143:02:37, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
316:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
306:04:07, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
59:08:43, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
44:The result was
207:
331:
318:
206:
204:
198:
192:
120:
114:
96:
34:
339:
338:
334:
333:
332:
330:
329:
328:
327:
321:deletion review
314:
202:
196:
193:
116:
87:
71:
68:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
337:
335:
326:
325:
309:
308:
290:
289:
288:
251:
231:
230:
212:
211:
185:
184:
167:
127:
126:
67:
62:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
336:
324:
322:
317:
311:
310:
307:
303:
299:
294:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
270:
269:
265:
261:
260:
255:
252:
250:
247:
244:
240:
236:
233:
232:
229:
225:
221:
217:
214:
213:
210:
205:
200:
199:
190:
187:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
168:
166:
162:
158:
154:
150:
147:
146:
145:
144:
140:
136:
132:
124:
119:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
55:
54:
50:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
315:
312:
292:
257:
253:
243:Renaissancee
234:
215:
195:
188:
174:Steve Dufour
169:
148:
128:
52:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
274:WP:NOT#NEWS
220:MilborneOne
131:WP:NOT#NEWS
278:Ironholds
135:Ironholds
157:Tabletop
123:View log
90:protect
85:history
293:Delete
246:(talk)
235:Delete
216:Delete
189:Delete
170:Delete
118:delete
94:delete
46:delete
298:Atmoz
239:Steve
197:Chzz
155:.
121:) – (
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
302:talk
282:talk
264:talk
254:Keep
237:per
224:talk
178:talk
161:talk
149:keep
139:talk
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
259:DGG
53:Nja
304:)
284:)
266:)
241:.
226:)
203:►
180:)
163:)
141:)
133:.
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
48:.
300:(
296:-
280:(
262:(
222:(
176:(
159:(
137:(
125:)
115:(
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.