328:
day. In a given country, the network TV schedules have typically been discussed in more depth in books, magazines, and newspaper media columns, than mere listings of the days programming. The scheduling choices, and their effects on the ratings of programs, are part of the subject matter of college courses in broadcasting and media. The schedule is a strategic choice of what program leads into a given program, and what the competition is in a time slot. They are not random.
327:
which says "..historically significant programme lists and schedules (such as the annual United States network television schedules) may be acceptable." The networks schedule should not be trivialized and misrepresented as mere "TV Guide," which says what the program's episode will be on a particular
276:
instead of making a directory of old TV Guides? Even an old TV Guide has no historical significance. What you guys are saying is that old TV Guides from 2008 and below are historically significant without explaining how it is. Whenever anyone posts links, it always shows notability for television and
366:
Major media form and of permanent historical interest. We cannot copy old TV guides into here or
Wikisource, because they are all of them still under copyright--and they contain much advertising material that is not encyclopedic, The schedule itself is what's proper material. We should probably add
512:
346:
248:
Same response as the one given for "2007 Australian network television schedule" directly above. These probably could have been put in the same nomination; although if they had been, someone else would probably have complained about that as well.
170:
490:; not encyclopedic. It also happens to be unsourced. This schedule implies that the same pograms were shown at the same time throughout the year; in fact variations did occur. Consequently the page is also misleading.
643:
allows television schedules. The real problem is the sourcing. I believe reliable sources exist but are not properly cited in the article. Assuming reliable sources can be found the article should stay.
98:
93:
102:
164:
85:
131:
221:
534:
185:
152:
49:
657:
631:
607:
581:
555:
524:
499:
479:
442:
424:
403:
382:
358:
337:
315:
286:
258:
236:
210:
67:
146:
628:
142:
89:
619:
as this schedule does not provide any commentary from reliable secondary sources that would indicate that the schedule is notable. --
17:
192:
475:
81:
73:
653:
603:
520:
158:
672:
36:
468:
591:
565:
516:
572:
and not isn't encyclopaedic for
Knowledge (XXG). It would be best suited on a Television history Wiki then here.
671:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
60:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
624:
495:
569:
399:
649:
599:
311:
282:
273:
254:
206:
178:
53:
640:
508:
454:
412:
391:
620:
491:
438:
354:
201:
The prod was contested in
December 2008. Television schedules do not belong in an encyclopedia.
323:
Keeping such articles about the schedule (as opposed to daily programming) is consistent with
232:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
577:
420:
395:
368:
333:
324:
548:
513:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of United States network television schedules
347:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of United States network television schedules
645:
595:
307:
278:
250:
202:
434:
378:
350:
228:
119:
573:
416:
329:
541:
52:
either. Please hash it out there before flooding AfD with every such list.
300:
Wife: The TV Guide is historically significant now that it's a year after.
373:
306:
Wife: Get my mom's old TV Guides from the attic and type those up also!
459:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
48:. Not only is there no consensus here, but there is no consensus
665:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
594:
apply? I understand the sourcing concerns but not this.
433:
Please read what NOTDIR actually says about TV schedules.
272:: If television schedules are so important why not create
126:
115:
111:
107:
177:
291:
Husband: I'm going to throw away last years TV Guide.
303:
Husband: Okay. I'll type this up on
Knowledge (XXG).
464:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
191:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
675:). No further edits should be made to this page.
222:list of Television-related deletion discussions
535:list of Australia-related deletion discussions
371:to the list of irrelevant AfD arguments.
8:
507:. Nomination rests on incorrect reading of
82:2006 Australian network television schedule
74:2006 Australian network television schedule
529:
294:Wife: Don't! Copy it onto Knowledge (XXG)!
216:
325:WP:NOT#Knowledge (XXG) is not a directory
533:: This debate has been included in the
220:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
345:per arguments I and others gave at
277:not the individual old TV Guides.
24:
511:; see generally my comments at
1:
658:16:48, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
632:13:33, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
608:16:53, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
582:11:53, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
556:02:36, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
525:23:51, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
500:21:28, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
480:23:33, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
443:19:52, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
425:10:48, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
404:04:56, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
383:03:55, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
359:00:18, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
338:17:01, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
316:00:55, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
287:00:33, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
259:20:36, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
237:19:33, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
211:18:39, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
68:13:37, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
692:
668:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
469:Backslash Forwardslash
639:- As has been stated
517:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
592:WP: INDISCRIMINATE
274:television schedule
44:The result was
566:WP:INDISCRIMINATE
558:
538:
482:
239:
225:
683:
670:
553:
546:
539:
463:
461:
457:
369:Harry and Louise
226:
196:
195:
181:
129:
123:
105:
63:
34:
691:
690:
686:
685:
684:
682:
681:
680:
679:
673:deletion review
666:
549:
542:
455:
452:
138:
125:
96:
80:
77:
61:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
689:
687:
678:
677:
661:
660:
634:
613:
612:
611:
610:
585:
584:
559:
527:
502:
484:
483:
462:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
428:
427:
406:
385:
361:
340:
318:
304:
301:
298:
295:
292:
289:
266:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
241:
240:
199:
198:
135:
76:
71:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
688:
676:
674:
669:
663:
662:
659:
655:
651:
647:
642:
638:
635:
633:
630:
626:
622:
621:Gavin Collins
618:
615:
614:
609:
605:
601:
597:
593:
589:
588:
587:
586:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
563:
560:
557:
554:
552:
547:
545:
536:
532:
528:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
503:
501:
497:
493:
492:Smile a While
489:
486:
485:
481:
477:
473:
470:
467:
460:
458:
451:
450:
444:
441:
440:
436:
432:
431:
430:
429:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
407:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
386:
384:
380:
376:
375:
370:
365:
362:
360:
357:
356:
352:
348:
344:
341:
339:
335:
331:
326:
322:
319:
317:
313:
309:
305:
302:
299:
297:Husband: Why?
296:
293:
290:
288:
284:
280:
275:
271:
268:
267:
260:
256:
252:
247:
246:
245:
244:
243:
242:
238:
234:
230:
223:
219:
215:
214:
213:
212:
208:
204:
194:
190:
187:
184:
180:
176:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
144:
141:
140:Find sources:
136:
133:
128:
121:
117:
113:
109:
104:
100:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
78:
75:
72:
70:
69:
66:
64:
57:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
667:
664:
636:
616:
568:but is also
561:
551:(Discussion)
550:
543:
530:
504:
487:
471:
465:
453:
437:
408:
387:
372:
363:
353:
342:
320:
269:
217:
200:
188:
182:
174:
167:
161:
155:
149:
139:
58:
54:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
396:Niteshift36
165:free images
646:Narthring
641:WP:NOTDIR
637:Weak keep
629:contribs)
596:Narthring
590:How does
570:unsourced
509:WP:NOTDIR
415:applies.
413:WP:NOTDIR
392:WP:NOTDIR
308:Joe Chill
279:Joe Chill
251:Mandsford
229:• Gene93k
203:Joe Chill
654:contribs
604:contribs
456:Relisted
435:Zagalejo
351:Zagalejo
132:View log
270:Comment
171:WP refs
159:scholar
99:protect
94:history
617:Delete
574:Bidgee
562:Delete
488:Delete
417:Stifle
409:Delete
388:Delete
330:Edison
143:Google
127:delete
103:delete
544:Bduke
379:talk
186:JSTOR
147:books
130:) – (
120:views
112:watch
108:links
16:<
650:talk
625:talk
600:talk
578:talk
564:per
531:Note
521:talk
505:Keep
496:talk
476:talk
421:talk
400:talk
364:Keep
343:Keep
334:talk
321:Keep
312:talk
283:talk
255:talk
233:talk
218:Note
207:talk
179:FENS
153:news
116:logs
90:talk
86:edit
62:Talk
50:here
540:--
439:^^^
374:DGG
355:^^^
227:--
193:TWL
656:)
652:•
606:)
602:•
580:)
537:.
523:)
515:.
498:)
478:)
423:)
411:,
402:)
394:.
390:.
381:)
349:.
336:)
314:)
285:)
257:)
235:)
224:.
209:)
173:)
118:|
114:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
55:NW
648:(
627:|
623:(
598:(
576:(
519:(
494:(
474:(
472:/
466:\
419:(
398:(
377:(
332:(
310:(
281:(
253:(
231:(
205:(
197:)
189:·
183:·
175:·
168:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
145:(
137:(
134:)
124:(
122:)
84:(
65:)
59:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.