509:
459:. Note that articles on air accidents with similar numbers of casualties are usually kept with little opposition. I wonder why? Could it be that people consider aeroplanes "sexier" than buses? If this is the reason then it's a very poor lookout for a serious encyclopaedia. If it's not the reason then I'm at a loss to work out what is. --
324:. 42 people dying in a road accident? Of course it's notable. Just imagine if it had happened in the USA or UK... We can't possibly expect an accident in Nepal to get a fraction of the coverage a similar accident would get in the developed world, but that doesn't mean it's any less notable.
157:
354:, which unless the people who die in it are notable, are not notable. There are similar accidents that occur world wide quite regularly, including in the USA. Bus plunges, in general, fail
388:, you will see that every single crash in the USA with anywhere near this loss of life (and considerably less) has an article (not that many, but that's not the issue). And rightly so. --
231:
118:
151:
406:
The bulk of the information in those lists are for accidents without articles. I have no problem with this crash being included in the appropriate list. However please read
479:
Because airplane accidents are much more rarer than bus accidents with the same amount of casualties, hence the treatment in reliable sources is much different. --
208:
91:
86:
95:
270:
78:
385:
381:
519:, because I am explaining to you policy, not debating it. If you want the rules changed, be my guest, but you wont do that in an AfD.--
493:
Sorry, but I don't see the validity of your point. Being rarer doesn't make an incident any more notable. It just makes it rarer. --
188:
Non-notable bus crash. Yes lots of people died, but no mention of this after it happened, no controversy, no sourcing, and orphaned.
17:
172:
139:
291:
429:
407:
549:
36:
133:
528:
502:
488:
468:
441:
419:
397:
367:
337:
316:
295:
274:
266:
246:
223:
200:
60:
129:
355:
548:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
82:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
179:
74:
66:
262:
325:
498:
464:
437:
393:
333:
219:
189:
287:
165:
145:
524:
484:
415:
363:
312:
196:
258:
242:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
516:
347:
494:
460:
433:
389:
329:
215:
283:
51:
520:
480:
411:
359:
308:
192:
238:
112:
282:
per nom; absent coverage after the fact or lasting effect, this is just news. –
351:
304:
508:
542:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
108:
104:
100:
164:
428:
Thank you. I am very well aware of the existence of
232:
178:
257:. This is a classic example of an article failing
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
552:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
230:Note: This debate has been included in the
207:Note: This debate has been included in the
515:You then need to take your discussion into
432:. However, that is not my point at all. --
380:. I'm afraid it's not mine. If you look at
229:
209:list of Nepal-related deletion discussions
206:
307:' story: sad, but no lasting notability.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
507:
386:List of road accidents 2010–2019
382:List of road accidents 2000–2009
1:
358:no matter were they happen.--
61:05:14, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
529:00:54, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
503:00:20, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
489:23:53, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
469:17:04, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
442:00:20, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
420:23:50, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
398:13:15, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
368:21:37, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
338:21:20, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
317:15:25, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
296:17:03, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
275:15:05, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
247:14:51, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
224:08:48, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
201:08:26, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
569:
545:Please do not modify it.
350:, but this is a classic
348:countering systemic bias
303:- Classic example of a '
32:Please do not modify it.
75:2006 Luham bus crash
67:2006 Luham bus crash
430:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
408:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
44:The result was
249:
235:
226:
212:
59:
560:
547:
511:
263:Strange Passerby
236:
213:
183:
182:
168:
116:
98:
58:
56:
49:
34:
568:
567:
563:
562:
561:
559:
558:
557:
556:
550:deletion review
543:
356:WP:NOTNEWSPAPER
125:
89:
73:
70:
52:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
566:
564:
555:
554:
539:
538:
537:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
472:
471:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
423:
422:
401:
400:
371:
370:
341:
340:
319:
298:
277:
251:
250:
227:
186:
185:
122:
69:
64:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
565:
553:
551:
546:
540:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
505:
504:
500:
496:
492:
491:
490:
486:
482:
478:
477:
476:
475:
474:
473:
470:
466:
462:
458:
455:
454:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
426:
425:
424:
421:
417:
413:
409:
405:
404:
403:
402:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
374:
373:
372:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
346:I am all for
345:
344:
343:
342:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
320:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
299:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
278:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
253:
252:
248:
244:
240:
233:
228:
225:
221:
217:
210:
205:
204:
203:
202:
198:
194:
191:
181:
177:
174:
171:
167:
163:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
131:
128:
127:Find sources:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
57:
55:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
544:
541:
512:
456:
377:
376:That's your
321:
300:
279:
254:
187:
175:
169:
161:
154:
148:
142:
136:
126:
53:
45:
43:
31:
28:
326:WP:SYSTEMIC
152:free images
495:Necrothesp
461:Necrothesp
434:Necrothesp
390:Necrothesp
352:bus plunge
330:Necrothesp
305:bus plunge
216:Tom Morris
190:WP:NOTNEWS
54:Sandstein
284:Roscelese
239:• Gene93k
521:Cerejota
513:Facepalm
481:Cerejota
412:Cerejota
360:Cerejota
309:Robofish
292:contribs
259:WP:EVENT
193:Cerejota
119:View log
517:WP:NOTE
457:Comment
378:opinion
158:WP refs
146:scholar
92:protect
87:history
301:Delete
280:Delete
255:Delete
130:Google
96:delete
46:delete
328:. --
173:JSTOR
134:books
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
525:talk
499:talk
485:talk
465:talk
438:talk
416:talk
394:talk
384:and
364:talk
334:talk
322:Keep
313:talk
288:talk
271:cont
267:talk
243:talk
220:talk
197:talk
166:FENS
140:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
410:.--
180:TWL
117:– (
527:)
501:)
487:)
467:)
440:)
418:)
396:)
366:)
336:)
315:)
294:)
290:⋅
273:)
269:•
261:.
245:)
237:—
234:.
222:)
211:.
199:)
160:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
48:.
523:(
497:(
483:(
463:(
436:(
414:(
392:(
362:(
332:(
311:(
286:(
265:(
241:(
218:(
214:—
195:(
184:)
176:·
170:·
162:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
137:·
132:(
124:(
121:)
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.