585:: I'm not voting either way on this as I don't really care (although I don't see the need for it, as it is not really encyclopedic), but I would like to say that while I understand that the What About X?/Otherstuff exists arguments are invalid in an AFD, surely as a policy it is responsible for a lot of heartache amongst contributors. As human beings by nature we look to precedent to see what is acceptable, so that when some articles are deleted and others are not (when they essentially are the same) it is bound to lead to feelings of frustration amongst some contributors (and also possibly the notion of selective/biased deletion). So I guess what I am really saying is that while Otherstuff exists is an invalid argument, it might be nice to actually have some consistency.
1290:
Showing a historic list of every show ever shown on a notable network, is perfectly fine by almanac standards for the
Knowledge (XXG). Television plays a massive role in shaping people's opinions, and affecting the world. If someone wanted to see where and when shows were at, and then do a study to
875:
instead of making a directory of old TV Guides? Even an old TV Guide has no historical significance. What you guys are saying is that old TV Guides from 2008 and below are historically significant without explaining how it is. Whenever anyone posts links, it always shows notability for television and
1011:
which says "..historically significant programme lists and schedules (such as the annual United States network television schedules) may be acceptable." This is not "TV Guide," which says what the program's episode will be on a particular day. In a given country, the network TV schedules have
1409:"2009 Australian network television schedule". Not true. Maybe that is what is true for parts of the year in some parts of Australia. It is not the schedule for what is curently happening in my part of Australia. My part of Australia is a lot bigger than Melbourne and Sydney.
983:
979:
975:
971:
1012:
typically been discussed in more depth in books, magazines, and newspaper media columns, than mere listings of the days programming. The schedule is a strategic choice of what program leads into a given program, and what the competition is in a time slot.
161:
1108:
1590:, "Do not add tally boxes to the deletion page." The admin who closes it is presumed able to evaluate the quality of the arguments, and whether they are based on policies or guidelines without your assistance in tallying. And it is not a vote.
89:
84:
93:
76:
543:
521:
155:
1391:. I relisted this debate because there are several similar cases open at the moment and my opinion was that there should be a unified approach to all of them. However, if I focus just on this one, it would be a
830:
While I don't agree with
Ironholds's reasoning on past TV schedules, I think the guy is right about a current schedule being too much like TV guide. Besides, I never watch Australian network television.
517:
945:
schedule is historically significant. And for anyone who wants this deleted because it is a current schedule, do you want the delete to be undone in 2010 when it is "historically significant".
48:. The debate has now moved to a more appropriate place, RFC. In order to keep the debate centralized, I am closing this AfD as No consensus and kindly ask everyone interested to participate at
1148:
I have no ulterior or pointy motives in nominating this for deletion. Either provide "Available evidence and logical inference" or withdraw your unwarranted and baseless personal attack.
1134:
my olfactory organ informs me that the nomination does not pass the smell test. The present outcome is pretty obvious: - divisive stuff that turns
Knowledge (XXG) into a battleground.
269:
122:
49:
397:
293:
ugh! I don't see how that isn't a directory listing--the shows are already in WP and searchable, so this just adds the ability to know what was on at 9PM on a
Tuesday on NBC?
368:
1291:
determine how each one affected someone, this might be of use. It also shows how the taste of the people changed over time, what sort of thing they watched year by year.
619:. Programming schedules are outside the realm of encyclopedias unless there is something descriptive to say about them (the current article is just the schedule, nothing
176:
143:
1454:
This should be an obvious delete. Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate collection of information, a directory, or a TV guide. It's an obvious example of what
1626:
1599:
1581:
1557:
1537:
1505:
1490:
shows that 21 editors feel these guides are unencyclopedic, ten think some are acceptable, and five think all such guides are appropriate for
Knowledge (XXG).
1478:
1440:
1418:
1401:
1381:
1357:
1331:
1314:
1282:
1262:
1233:
1219:
1202:
1184:
1157:
1143:
1095:
1073:
1042:
1021:
999:
954:
936:
914:
885:
863:
840:
818:
798:
773:
756:
739:
720:
698:
670:
653:
636:
611:
594:
575:
559:
533:
508:
483:
460:
438:
415:
386:
356:
332:
302:
281:
260:
243:
213:
58:
137:
627:
policy on them which explicitly mentions them. Information like this dates very quickly, we avoid having articles on bus schedules for the same reason.
1487:
1193:. It says that U.S. network programming schedules are historically significant. I would extend that to other countries, since this is not "U.S.pedia"
133:
1119:" defies imagination. It is not only grossly misleading but downright counterfactual as this type of information is specifically mentioned and even
764:
This is notable and encyclopedic material here in the United States, and barring any systemic bias its just as notable and encyclopedic Down Under.
277:
925:
this is argument from anecdote--which often cuts both ways, for what this amounts to is the proper collection of material for an encyclopedia.
183:
80:
1471:
1112:
72:
64:
586:
273:
149:
17:
789:
as strategy is notable, but I'm less convinced that directory listings of the annual outcomes of that process are notable.
309:
1641:
36:
1124:
1116:
709:
1640:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
1139:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
590:
268:
Its not a directory, its a just a novel navigation device. We have the same for US television and radio. See
1414:
456:
326:
237:
1054:
s significant as the history of the real world presentation of a major artform. I note the repeated use of
694:
1542:
Except that the policy has not been overturned. The alleged lack of consensus means the policy is upheld.
737:
432:
272:. A directory is a list of red links or of external links. A list of blue links is a navigation device. --
1091:
786:
452:
688:
1216:
1181:
1039:
815:
505:
480:
412:
383:
353:
1576:
1552:
1500:
1259:
1153:
1135:
950:
910:
881:
872:
858:
836:
752:
747:: Who would look up Australian television schedules from the 1950s to the 2000s in an encylopedia?
631:
607:
555:
209:
201:
169:
1369:
1341:
1165:
1104:
1083:
684:
493:
1410:
769:
666:
318:
229:
1622:
1377:
1007:
Keeping such articles about the schedule (as opposed to daily programming) is consistent with
730:
426:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
466:
1595:
1464:
1327:
1292:
1229:
1198:
1087:
1055:
1017:
716:
571:
50:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:What
Knowledge (XXG) is not/Archive 30#Per station television schedules
1587:
1455:
1275:
1131:
1066:
1026:
Scheduling choices generally perhaps, but this schedule specifically? What makes this one "
1008:
988:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/2009 Australian network television schedule (weekday)
984:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/1990 Australian network television schedule (weekday)
980:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/1982 Australian network television schedule (weekday)
976:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/1958 Australian network television schedule (weekday)
972:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/1957 Australian network television schedule (weekday)
803:
624:
539:
341:
193:
1208:
1173:
1031:
807:
649:
497:
472:
404:
375:
345:
1429:
what I gather you are saying, then, is that the article should be expanded? Go to it.
1109:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of United States network television schedules
1568:
1544:
1492:
1372:. Article should not list tv schedules and I do not see how this has any significance.
1279:
1256:
1149:
1070:
946:
906:
877:
850:
832:
748:
628:
603:
551:
529:
205:
197:
1251:
1111:(same nominator, same topic, same batch): The deletion rationale: "a classic case of
1533:
1436:
995:
932:
794:
765:
662:
298:
256:
196:, particularly "Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate collection of information".
1618:
1373:
110:
1069:, as far as I can see, and the above Keep comments don't convince me otherwise.
1591:
1459:
1458:. I personally cannot comprehend how this is possibly historically significant.
1323:
1225:
1207:
I think the validity of that special exemption in the policy is questionable. --
1194:
1013:
712:
567:
1270:- and, to closing admin, my !vote to the other Australian TV Guide articles is
645:
424:- Per Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ). Pure deletionist copyright paranoia. -
1397:
1353:
848:, unsourced. I'll bet that it is copied verbatim from a copyrighted source.
525:
54:
516:. An interesting historical artefact, consistent with existing articles at
899:
Wife: The TV Guide is historically significant now that it's a year after.
1528:
1431:
991:
927:
905:
Wife: Get my mom's old TV Guides from the attic and type those up also!
790:
728:- Indiscriminate info, unsuitable for inclusion within an encyclopedia. –
294:
252:
1224:
If you want to change a policy, please go to the policy page to do so.
1107:. As some delete voters have done, I also copy my comments made at
806:; And fwiw, I personally don't find the US ones any more notable. --
1346:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
1634:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
941:
It's funny that you guys say that when no one has said how this
451:
Once again, Knowledge (XXG) is not to be confused with tv guide.
1518:
that pretty much comes to no-consensus at least as regards
1395:, NOTDIR as the main reason (as it was discussed above). --
623:
the schedule). CyberCobra correctly points to the relevant
871:: If television schedules are so important why not create
1488:
Wikipedia_talk:What_Wikipedia_is_not#The_consensus_so_far
661:
Are we really questioning this its really easy Delete.--
1278:
examples, but, this one's pretty much common sense...--
496:; what makes this schedule historically significant? --
117:
106:
102:
98:
1172:"; no evidence has been presented that this one is. --
168:
890:
Husband: I'm going to throw away last years TV Guide.
73:
2009 Australian network television schedule (weekday)
65:
2009 Australian network television schedule (weekday)
902:
Husband: Okay. I'll type this up on
Knowledge (XXG).
518:
United States primetime network television schedules
1351:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
270:
2009–2010 United States network television schedule
182:
494:Knowledge (XXG) is not an electronic program guide
1058:arguments, which do not help rational discussion.
970:: Please consider together the related open AfDs
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
1644:). No further edits should be made to this page.
398:list of Television-related deletion discussions
1617:per Power.corrupts, above at 22:01, 18 Aug --
1562:And many of the ten in-betweeners are against
1249:unless sources are provided as to why this is
1168:specifically requires that such schedules be "
369:list of Australia-related deletion discussions
8:
1113:Knowledge (XXG):What Knowledge (XXG) is not
893:Wife: Don't! Copy it onto Knowledge (XXG)!
392:
363:
1009:WP:NOT#Knowledge (XXG) is not a directory
222:. Not particiularly encyclopedic either.
566:On the contrary, it is highly relevant.
396:: This debate has been included in the
367:: This debate has been included in the
1127:as acceptable. While I would like to
1274:as well. I could go through a list of
1322:, Knowledge (XXG) is not a TV guide.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
876:not the individual old TV Guides.
24:
274:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )
204:) 02:20, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
1:
1526:guides, such as this one .
1189:It does not "require it", it
522:survived deletion discussion
449:do I really need to comment?
1627:22:17, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
1600:02:38, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
1582:22:03, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
1558:22:02, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
1538:22:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
1506:21:54, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
1479:21:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
1441:22:01, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
1419:19:46, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
1402:18:03, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
1382:14:41, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
1358:13:50, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
1332:10:51, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
1315:16:54, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
1283:12:57, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
1263:11:27, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
1234:02:42, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
1220:01:14, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
1203:14:25, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
1185:23:39, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
1158:22:27, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
1144:22:01, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
1096:04:50, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
1074:11:48, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
1043:06:25, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
1030:" as required by WP:NOT? --
1022:16:57, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
1000:02:37, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
955:03:33, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
937:22:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
915:00:55, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
886:00:32, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
864:23:41, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
841:22:07, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
819:00:12, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
799:21:02, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
774:20:51, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
757:18:15, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
740:16:58, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
721:16:16, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
699:13:25, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
671:11:22, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
654:07:17, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
637:06:45, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
612:05:38, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
595:05:38, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
576:02:39, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
560:04:58, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
534:04:56, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
509:04:47, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
484:04:34, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
461:04:17, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
439:03:35, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
416:03:25, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
387:03:25, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
357:04:33, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
333:09:33, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
303:03:23, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
282:03:16, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
261:02:49, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
244:02:49, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
214:02:20, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
59:12:58, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
1661:
602:: A television schedule.
550:- it is hardly relevant.
1637:Please do not modify it.
1486:a related discussion at
1252:Historically significant
1170:historically significant
1164:The relevant section of
1028:historically significant
32:Please do not modify it.
1456:Knowledge (XXG) is not
675:Nice looking article,
467:Yeah, you still should
968:Note to closing admin
787:Broadcast programming
546:you mentioned was in
344:should be avoided. --
251:this directory info.
873:television schedule
310:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
1065:, a clear case of
44:The result was
1360:
708:Ironclad case of
634:
441:
418:
401:
389:
372:
1652:
1639:
1580:
1573:
1566:program guides.
1556:
1549:
1504:
1497:
1477:
1474:
1467:
1462:
1350:
1348:
1344:
1311:
1308:
1305:
1302:
1299:
1296:
1214:
1179:
1056:Harry and Louise
1037:
862:
855:
813:
733:
702:
632:
503:
478:
435:
429:
425:
410:
402:
381:
373:
351:
331:
322:
315:
242:
233:
226:
187:
186:
172:
120:
114:
96:
34:
1660:
1659:
1655:
1654:
1653:
1651:
1650:
1649:
1648:
1642:deletion review
1635:
1569:
1567:
1545:
1543:
1493:
1491:
1472:
1469:
1465:
1460:
1342:
1339:
1309:
1306:
1303:
1300:
1297:
1294:
1212:
1177:
1125:WP:NOTDIRECTORY
1117:WP:NOTDIRECTORY
1115:, particularly
1035:
851:
849:
811:
731:
710:WP:NOTDIRECTORY
692:
544:deletion debate
501:
476:
433:
427:
408:
379:
349:
329:
323:
316:
312:
240:
234:
227:
223:
129:
116:
87:
71:
68:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1658:
1656:
1647:
1646:
1630:
1629:
1611:
1610:
1609:
1608:
1607:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1560:
1511:
1510:
1509:
1508:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1445:
1444:
1443:
1422:
1421:
1404:
1385:
1384:
1362:
1361:
1349:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1317:
1285:
1265:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1236:
1161:
1160:
1136:Power.corrupts
1098:
1077:
1060:
1047:
1046:
1045:
1002:
964:
963:
962:
961:
960:
959:
958:
957:
918:
917:
903:
900:
897:
894:
891:
888:
866:
843:
824:
823:
822:
821:
801:
777:
776:
759:
742:
723:
703:
697:comment added
673:
656:
639:
614:
597:
580:
579:
578:
563:
562:
511:
488:
487:
486:
453:keystoneridin!
442:
419:
390:
361:
360:
359:
336:
335:
325:
307:
306:
305:
285:
284:
263:
246:
236:
190:
189:
126:
67:
62:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1657:
1645:
1643:
1638:
1632:
1631:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1613:
1612:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1589:
1585:
1584:
1583:
1578:
1574:
1572:
1565:
1561:
1559:
1554:
1550:
1548:
1541:
1540:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1530:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1507:
1502:
1498:
1496:
1489:
1485:
1482:
1481:
1480:
1475:
1468:
1463:
1457:
1453:
1450:
1449:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1433:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1425:
1424:
1423:
1420:
1416:
1412:
1411:Duffbeerforme
1408:
1405:
1403:
1400:
1399:
1394:
1390:
1387:
1386:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1364:
1363:
1359:
1356:
1355:
1347:
1345:
1338:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1318:
1316:
1313:
1312:
1289:
1286:
1284:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1266:
1264:
1261:
1258:
1254:
1253:
1248:
1245:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1218:
1215:
1211:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1183:
1180:
1176:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1162:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1102:
1099:
1097:
1093:
1089:
1085:
1081:
1078:
1075:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1061:
1059:
1057:
1051:
1048:
1044:
1041:
1038:
1034:
1029:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1019:
1015:
1010:
1006:
1003:
1001:
997:
993:
989:
985:
981:
977:
973:
969:
966:
965:
956:
952:
948:
944:
940:
939:
938:
934:
930:
929:
924:
923:
922:
921:
920:
919:
916:
912:
908:
904:
901:
898:
896:Husband: Why?
895:
892:
889:
887:
883:
879:
874:
870:
867:
865:
860:
856:
854:
847:
844:
842:
838:
834:
829:
826:
825:
820:
817:
814:
810:
805:
802:
800:
796:
792:
788:
784:
781:
780:
779:
778:
775:
771:
767:
763:
760:
758:
754:
750:
746:
743:
741:
738:
735:
734:
727:
724:
722:
718:
714:
711:
707:
704:
700:
696:
690:
686:
682:
678:
674:
672:
668:
664:
660:
659:Strong Delete
657:
655:
651:
647:
643:
640:
638:
635:
630:
626:
622:
618:
615:
613:
609:
605:
601:
598:
596:
592:
588:
587:115.129.5.223
584:
581:
577:
573:
569:
565:
564:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
537:
536:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
512:
510:
507:
504:
500:
495:
492:
489:
485:
482:
479:
475:
470:
468:
464:
463:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
445:Strong Delete
443:
440:
436:
430:
423:
420:
417:
414:
411:
407:
399:
395:
391:
388:
385:
382:
378:
370:
366:
362:
358:
355:
352:
348:
343:
340:
339:
338:
337:
334:
330:
328:
321:
320:
314:
311:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
289:
288:
287:
286:
283:
279:
275:
271:
267:
264:
262:
258:
254:
250:
247:
245:
241:
239:
232:
231:
225:
221:
218:
217:
216:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
185:
181:
178:
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
135:
132:
131:Find sources:
127:
124:
119:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
56:
52:. Thank you.
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
1636:
1633:
1614:
1570:
1563:
1546:
1527:
1523:
1519:
1494:
1483:
1451:
1430:
1406:
1396:
1392:
1388:
1365:
1352:
1340:
1319:
1293:
1287:
1271:
1267:
1250:
1246:
1209:
1190:
1174:
1169:
1128:
1120:
1100:
1079:
1062:
1053:
1049:
1032:
1027:
1004:
987:
967:
942:
926:
868:
852:
845:
827:
808:
785:the fact of
782:
761:
744:
732:Juliancolton
729:
725:
705:
680:
679:to at least
676:
658:
641:
620:
616:
599:
582:
547:
513:
498:
490:
473:
465:
448:
444:
428:NeutralHomer
421:
405:
393:
376:
364:
346:
324:
317:
313:
290:
265:
248:
235:
228:
224:
219:
191:
179:
173:
165:
158:
152:
146:
140:
130:
53:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
1191:presumes it
1121:wiki-linked
1088:Niteshift36
693:—Preceding
422:Speedy Keep
156:free images
1132:good faith
943:particular
220:delete all
1577:reasoning
1571:Abductive
1553:reasoning
1547:Abductive
1501:reasoning
1495:Abductive
1473:review me
1370:WP:NOTDIR
1280:Unionhawk
1166:WP:NOTDIR
1150:Ironholds
1105:WP:NOTDIR
1084:WP:NOTDIR
1071:Lankiveil
947:Joe Chill
907:Joe Chill
878:Joe Chill
859:reasoning
853:Abductive
833:Mandsford
749:Joe Chill
681:somewhere
677:transwiki
629:Sjakkalle
604:Joe Chill
552:Ironholds
471:Grazi. --
206:Ironholds
198:Ironholds
1586:And per
1524:national
1343:Relisted
766:Alansohn
663:Dcheagle
633:(Check!)
192:classic
123:View log
1619:Noroton
1564:current
1520:network
1484:Comment
1407:Comment
1389:Comment
1374:Richard
869:Comment
783:Comment
745:Comment
695:undated
685:Dr. Eme
583:Comment
291:Comment
162:WP refs
150:scholar
90:protect
85:history
1592:Edison
1588:WP:AFD
1452:Delete
1393:delete
1366:Delete
1324:Stifle
1320:Delete
1276:WP:NOT
1272:Delete
1268:Delete
1247:Delete
1226:Edison
1217:(talk)
1195:Edison
1182:(talk)
1129:assume
1080:Delete
1067:WP:NOT
1063:Delete
1040:(talk)
1014:Edison
846:Delete
828:Delete
816:(talk)
804:WP:WAX
726:Delete
713:Mangoe
706:DELETE
642:Delete
625:WP:NOT
617:Delete
600:Delete
568:Edison
542:. The
540:WP:WAX
520:which
506:(talk)
491:Delete
481:(talk)
413:(talk)
384:(talk)
354:(talk)
342:WP:WAX
327:Willed
249:Delete
238:Willed
194:WP:NOT
134:Google
118:delete
94:delete
1534:talk
1437:talk
1310:Focus
1260:garra
1213:cobra
1210:Cyber
1178:cobra
1175:Cyber
1036:cobra
1033:Cyber
933:talk
812:cobra
809:Cyber
646:Kevin
621:about
502:cobra
499:Cyber
477:cobra
474:Cyber
409:cobra
406:Cyber
380:cobra
377:Cyber
350:cobra
347:Cyber
177:JSTOR
138:books
121:) – (
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
1623:talk
1615:Keep
1596:talk
1415:talk
1398:Tone
1378:talk
1368:per
1354:Tone
1328:talk
1288:Keep
1257:Gnan
1230:talk
1199:talk
1154:talk
1140:talk
1101:Keep
1092:talk
1050:Keep
1018:talk
1005:Keep
996:talk
951:talk
911:talk
882:talk
837:talk
795:talk
770:talk
762:Keep
753:talk
717:talk
689:talk
667:talk
650:talk
608:talk
591:talk
572:talk
556:talk
548:2007
538:See
530:talk
526:WWGB
514:Keep
457:talk
434:Talk
394:Note
365:Note
319:Weak
299:talk
278:talk
266:Keep
257:talk
230:Weak
210:talk
202:talk
170:FENS
144:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
55:Tone
1529:DGG
1522:or
1466:meh
1461:Tim
1432:DGG
1123:in
992:JJL
928:DGG
791:JJL
691:)
403:--
374:--
295:JJL
253:JJL
184:TWL
1625:)
1598:)
1536:)
1439:)
1417:)
1380:)
1330:)
1255:,
1232:)
1201:)
1156:)
1142:)
1103:.
1094:)
1086:.
1082:.
1052:It
1020:)
998:)
990:.
986:,
982:,
978:,
974:,
953:)
935:)
913:)
884:)
839:)
797:)
772:)
755:)
736:|
719:)
683:.
669:)
652:)
644:.
610:)
593:)
574:)
558:)
532:)
524:.
459:)
437:•
431:•
400:.
371:.
301:)
280:)
259:)
212:)
164:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
1621:(
1594:(
1579:)
1575:(
1555:)
1551:(
1532:(
1503:)
1499:(
1476:)
1470:(
1435:(
1413:(
1376:(
1326:(
1307:m
1304:a
1301:e
1298:r
1295:D
1228:(
1197:(
1152:(
1138:(
1090:(
1076:.
1016:(
994:(
949:(
931:(
909:(
880:(
861:)
857:(
835:(
793:(
768:(
751:(
715:(
701:.
687:(
665:(
648:(
606:(
589:(
570:(
554:(
528:(
469:.
455:(
447:-
297:(
276:(
255:(
208:(
200:(
188:)
180:·
174:·
166:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
141:·
136:(
128:(
125:)
115:(
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.