591:, and the majority of the articles in the category, really. The loss of life was greater at Erebus, for sure, but last I checked there was no ghoulish minimum body count for notability. Conversely, if I write and publish a paper on this event, does its intrinsic notability change? Impossible - the two are disjoint. Thanks for chiming in anyway!
391:
which generated a very large amount of news coverage. Which is a long-winded way of agreeing with
Brandmeister when he says news coverage alone is not always indication of notability. If it is the second-deadliest air crash in the USA this year, then all I can say is the USA is having a good year in
382:
fatal aircraft crashes worldwide result in an investigation; all fatal car crashes are investigated in the country I live in. Just about anything will generate at least some news coverage these days - an aircraft crash in Sydney in which I was a passenger and which resulted in no injuries at all was
320:
The event caused an investigation that is ongoing, therefore it fits in WP:EVENT. It also had the second highest fatality rate of any aviation incidents this year in the United States, and one of the highest in the world as of now. There was lots of coverage by many major news sources. It is a
609:, as opposed to say your own blog, then it will help establish notability, but it still doesn't change the reality that light aircraft crashes with this number of deaths are extremely common events, just as automobile crashes with this number of deaths are also. -
511:
You cannot seriously think this is similar to one of New
Zealand's worst disasters in which a Douglas DC-10 airliner with hundreds of people on board crashed into Mt Erebus in Antarctica; about which books have been written and documentaries have been made and
544:
Actually I can't, other than they are air crashes - you might as well say that a
Citroen 2CV is the same as an M1 Abrams tank because they are both motor vehicles. Nobody is going to write a book about this helicopter crash. On the other hand,
166:
160:
530:
I'm not sure that's a productive tone :) In the neutral context of air crashes, notability, and encyclopedic categorisation, there are plenty of similarities, which I am sure you can see.
92:
87:
96:
274:
79:
392:
terms of aviation safety; however the statement 'one of the highest in the world as of now' is frankly crap and "deaths=notability" is not a guideline for having an article on WP.
255:
217:
119:
126:
236:
489:- very similar class of event, and that was certainly notable. A lack of coverage is not an automatic guarantee of non-notability; see e.g. the coverage extent for
347:. Crashes of private or company aircraft are usually non-notable, unless there was a lasting effect, a really high number of deaths or a notable person aboard.
181:
148:
647:
618:
600:
582:
539:
525:
502:
477:
460:
443:
422:
401:
371:
351:
330:
314:
285:
266:
247:
228:
209:
61:
142:
451:- light aircraft accidents like this are a daily occurrence, just not notable as there is no lasting effect beyond the fatalities. -
17:
138:
83:
573:. That is what notability looks like. It also looks to me that the Sunbird Aviation crash article warrants examining at AfD.
388:
188:
75:
67:
666:
40:
588:
490:
486:
154:
439:
309:
434:
applies. Since there is no other area where this event is notable, it stands that deletion is warranted.
662:
36:
435:
57:
431:
410:
360:
344:
198:
326:
297:
282:
263:
244:
225:
206:
174:
485:
Commercial tourism flight involving deaths. This is the epitome of a notable air crash. See also
473:
367:
643:
578:
521:
418:
397:
348:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
661:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
596:
535:
498:
340:
614:
456:
296:
as I myself reviewed this, certainly nothing else suggestive of a better notable article.
53:
606:
587:
Well, there are plenty of aircrashes that nobody is going to write a book about - like
322:
278:
259:
240:
221:
202:
571:
Psychological sequelae of operation overdue following the DC10 aircrash in
Antarctica
469:
468:
As above. Sad, yes. but WP:NOTNEWS, and lacking sources other than local newspapers--
363:
639:
574:
517:
414:
393:
113:
592:
531:
494:
610:
551:
The Erebus papers: edited extracts from the Erebus proceedings with commentary
452:
343:. News coverage alone is not always indication of notability per
655:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
109:
105:
101:
173:
547:
The Erebus enquiry: a tragic miscarriage of justice
275:
187:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
669:). No further edits should be made to this page.
256:list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions
218:list of Aviation-related deletion discussions
8:
273:Note: This debate has been included in the
254:Note: This debate has been included in the
235:Note: This debate has been included in the
216:Note: This debate has been included in the
237:list of Events-related deletion discussions
272:
253:
234:
215:
516:gets coverage, almost forty years later.
321:notable event that fits in the criteria.
387:as well as local news. We also have the
281:, is the complaint department really on
262:, is the complaint department really on
243:, is the complaint department really on
224:, is the complaint department really on
205:, is the complaint department really on
76:2016 Smoky Mountains helicopter crash
68:2016 Smoky Mountains helicopter crash
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
389:2016 man-punched-on-a-train incident
605:Well if you have it published in a
24:
638:- non-notable helicopter crash.
52:. The consensus is to delete.
1:
589:2016 Sunbird Aviation crash
491:2016 Sunbird Aviation crash
383:mentioned in the Singapore
686:
487:Air New Zealand Flight 901
201:. Of no long term impact.
658:Please do not modify it.
648:21:50, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
619:13:46, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
601:13:36, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
583:20:41, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
540:20:05, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
526:13:58, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
503:09:46, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
478:04:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)
461:22:33, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
444:15:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
423:15:39, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
402:12:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
372:11:39, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
352:10:25, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
331:04:42, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
315:00:09, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
286:23:52, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
267:23:52, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
248:23:52, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
229:23:52, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
210:23:50, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
62:00:17, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
339:, already mentioned in
555:Flight 901 to Erebus
413:, as stated above.
563:Verdict on Erebus
430:As stated above,
288:
269:
250:
231:
677:
660:
341:2016 in aviation
312:
307:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
685:
684:
680:
679:
678:
676:
675:
674:
673:
667:deletion review
656:
607:reliable source
436:RickinBaltimore
310:
298:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
683:
681:
672:
671:
651:
650:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
623:
622:
621:
506:
505:
480:
463:
446:
425:
404:
374:
354:
318:
317:
290:
289:
270:
251:
232:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
682:
670:
668:
664:
659:
653:
652:
649:
645:
641:
637:
634:
633:
620:
616:
612:
608:
604:
603:
602:
598:
594:
590:
586:
585:
584:
580:
576:
572:
568:
564:
560:
559:Impact Erebus
556:
552:
548:
543:
542:
541:
537:
533:
529:
528:
527:
523:
519:
515:
510:
509:
508:
507:
504:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
481:
479:
475:
471:
467:
464:
462:
458:
454:
450:
447:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
426:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
405:
403:
399:
395:
390:
386:
385:Straits Times
381:
378:
375:
373:
369:
365:
362:
358:
355:
353:
350:
346:
342:
338:
335:
334:
333:
332:
328:
324:
316:
313:
308:
305:
301:
295:
292:
291:
287:
284:
280:
276:
271:
268:
265:
261:
257:
252:
249:
246:
242:
238:
233:
230:
227:
223:
219:
214:
213:
212:
211:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
657:
654:
635:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
513:
482:
465:
448:
427:
406:
384:
379:
376:
356:
349:Brandmeister
336:
319:
303:
299:
293:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
197:Tragic but
161:free images
567:White out!
432:WP:NOTNEWS
411:WP:NOTNEWS
361:WP:NOTNEWS
345:WP:NOTNEWS
279:...William
260:...William
241:...William
222:...William
203:...William
199:WP:NOTNEWS
54:Malcolmxl5
663:talk page
323:Beejsterb
283:the roof?
264:the roof?
245:the roof?
226:the roof?
207:the roof?
37:talk page
665:or in a
470:Petebutt
364:Kristijh
120:View log
39:or in a
640:Mjroots
575:YSSYguy
518:YSSYguy
415:Kierzek
394:YSSYguy
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
636:Delete
593:Leondz
532:Leondz
495:Leondz
466:Delete
449:Delete
428:Delete
407:Delete
377:Delete
357:Delete
337:Delete
306:wister
302:wister
294:Delete
139:Google
97:delete
50:delete
611:Ahunt
514:still
453:Ahunt
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
644:talk
615:talk
597:talk
579:talk
569:and
536:talk
522:talk
499:talk
483:Keep
474:talk
457:talk
440:talk
419:talk
398:talk
368:talk
327:talk
311:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
380:all
189:TWL
118:– (
646:)
617:)
599:)
581:)
565:,
561:,
557:,
553:,
549:,
538:)
524:)
501:)
493:.
476:)
459:)
442:)
421:)
409:,
400:)
370:)
359:,
329:)
277:.
258:.
239:.
220:.
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
642:(
613:(
595:(
577:(
534:(
520:(
497:(
472:(
455:(
438:(
417:(
396:(
366:(
325:(
304:T
300:S
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.