352:. I created this article because I saw that the dates had been announced, and because I had seen other "untitled" films listed on years in film articles before. There is some information here that seems like it would be reasonable to keep, since it does say which studios are involved and what the release dates for the films are. I'm not sure on any specific examples, but I'm pretty sure there have been similar entries kept on years in film articles in the past, though there are usually other titled entries as well (as in the
253:- yeah... maybe... on the fence a bit with this one. Sure, it's probably too early, but there are a couple of things there and we're going to get more and more announcements of things due for release in 2018. I just wonder if it's worth deleting it now, only to recreate it in a couple of months time. 2-3 more announcements would probably do it. If anyone wants to
357:
dates can be updated if they happen to change (but for now, they are still official). However, if the information in this article is not considered to be strong enough to warrant its own article, I guess it can be deleted. If the article is deleted, I still think it would be a good idea to save the information in it somewhere.
375:
Actually, this seems like it could be part of the reason that years this far in the future had used to be contained in one article, such as "2015 and beyond in film" or something. If it still worked that way (which it apparently doesn't, anymore), then this information would probably be able to stay
356:
article). This article provides a space that could easily be updated when more information has been released (which seems likely to happen at least relatively soon). It seems like only a matter of time before more films will be announced for this year, and these films will be titled. Likewise, the
465:
find more was enough to tip me to the other side of the fine line - from weak delete to weak keep - and I've changed my note above. 5 years is a long way into the future, but obviously large film studios plan multi-million-dollar projects that far in advance. Plenty of other industries do.
166:
593:
What does that have to do with this? I've never created a hoax article, and I simply wouldn't do so. Just look up "Disney 2018" on Google and you can find a lot more sources if you want.
160:
119:
305:
I assume ComingSoon.net is a reliable source, since it seems to be the most common one used to provide references for films on the years in film articles.
214:
126:
92:
87:
397:: There's no real benefit to looking this far ahead on future releases and this page doesn't tell you anything about the films.
96:
17:
509:
181:
79:
148:
508:
guy who refused to make a movie for Putin! No, you're right, of course, but the article is about 2018 in film, not
231:
57:
672:
40:
625:
142:
203:
431:
138:
668:
653:
629:
602:
588:
581:
546:
535:
529:
522:
499:
479:
472:
451:
435:
406:
402:
385:
366:
342:
335:
314:
296:
270:
263:
237:
206:
61:
53:
36:
188:
621:
174:
649:
331:
199:
571:'d that one. I'm pretty sure it was a list of fake stuff with no references and was created to
598:
427:
381:
362:
310:
83:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
667:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
641:
576:
575:, as opposed to this which has actual references, though they may not have a lot of detail.
517:
467:
398:
327:
258:
572:
154:
620:- Way too soon. Five years is too much time given the average production cycle of works.
461:- I've added a couple of things I found in seemingly reliable sources. The fact that I
339:
226:
645:
568:
254:
594:
513:
377:
358:
353:
306:
290:
285:
281:
75:
67:
414:. Without specifics, it's pretty useless. Although I am looking forward to seeing
113:
257:
until it's "ready" for main article space, I wouldn't strongly object to that.
636:
219:
423:
661:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
504:
That's fair, though I'm sure there's a horrible story about the
512:. We could likely say the same about many of the entries at
280:
Everything is untitled, not sure if ComingSoon.net is a
484:
109:
105:
101:
516:, and certainly about some of the other 2018 entries.
173:
485:
Vladmir Putin ordering the government to make a film
487:is one thing; whether the government will actually
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
675:). No further edits should be made to this page.
443:per Lugnuts. Five years in the future? Come on.
424:my brother Darryl and my other brother Darryl
187:
8:
213:Note: This debate has been included in the
284:or not either (not familar with the site).
538:, the article could be a borderline hoax.
212:
215:list of Film-related deletion discussions
510:Films guaranteed to be released in 2018
197:It is simply too soon for this article
7:
24:
255:baby-sit this and keep it updated
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
420:Untitled Disney Animation 3D
416:Untitled Disney Animation 3D
692:
376:on that article for sure.
288:isn't much better either.
654:06:36, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
640:for this one (Delete per
62:00:59, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
664:Please do not modify it.
630:01:09, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
603:02:07, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
589:09:49, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
547:08:21, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
530:06:26, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
500:06:04, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
480:07:38, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
452:06:36, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
436:23:07, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
407:21:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
386:18:06, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
367:17:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
343:16:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
315:17:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
297:08:21, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
271:07:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
238:06:49, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
207:06:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
534:Actually, judging from
491:said film is another.
48:The result was
545:
498:
450:
240:
202:
683:
666:
585:
544:
542:
526:
497:
495:
476:
449:
447:
293:
267:
236:
234:
229:
224:
198:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
691:
690:
686:
685:
684:
682:
681:
680:
679:
673:deletion review
662:
637:Stanley Burrell
583:
540:
524:
493:
474:
445:
291:
282:reliable source
265:
232:
227:
220:
218:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
689:
687:
678:
677:
657:
656:
632:
622:ChrisGualtieri
614:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
608:
607:
606:
605:
591:
556:
555:
554:
553:
552:
551:
550:
549:
455:
454:
438:
409:
391:
390:
389:
388:
370:
369:
346:
345:
336:WP:CRYSTALBALL
320:
319:
318:
317:
300:
299:
274:
273:
242:
241:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
688:
676:
674:
670:
665:
659:
658:
655:
651:
647:
643:
639:
638:
633:
631:
627:
623:
619:
616:
615:
604:
600:
596:
592:
590:
587:
586:
580:
579:
574:
570:
566:
565:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
557:
548:
543:
537:
533:
532:
531:
528:
527:
521:
520:
515:
511:
507:
503:
502:
501:
496:
490:
486:
483:
482:
481:
478:
477:
471:
470:
464:
460:
457:
456:
453:
448:
442:
439:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
410:
408:
404:
400:
396:
393:
392:
387:
383:
379:
374:
373:
372:
371:
368:
364:
360:
355:
351:
348:
347:
344:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
322:
321:
316:
312:
308:
304:
303:
302:
301:
298:
295:
294:
287:
283:
279:
276:
275:
272:
269:
268:
262:
261:
256:
252:
251:
247:
244:
243:
239:
235:
230:
225:
223:
216:
211:
210:
209:
208:
205:
201:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
663:
660:
634:
617:
582:
577:
573:make a point
539:
523:
518:
514:2014 in film
505:
492:
488:
473:
468:
462:
458:
444:
440:
428:Clarityfiend
419:
415:
411:
394:
354:2017 in film
349:
323:
289:
286:2017 in film
277:
264:
259:
249:
248:
245:
221:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
76:2018 in film
68:2018 in film
49:
47:
31:
28:
399:Praemonitus
338:also apply.
332:WP:Too soon
328:hammer time
250:Weak delete
161:free images
340:...William
669:talk page
642:WP:HAMMER
635:Call out
350:Weak keep
246:Weak keep
200:BOVINEBOY
54:T. Canens
37:talk page
671:or in a
646:Eauhomme
578:Stalwart
567:Yeah, I
519:Stalwart
469:Stalwart
326:. It is
260:Stalwart
120:View log
39:or in a
595:Alphius
459:Comment
378:Alphius
359:Alphius
307:Alphius
292:Lugnuts
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
618:Delete
569:WP:NAC
541:Erpert
494:Erpert
446:Erpert
441:Delete
412:Delete
395:Delete
324:Delete
278:Delete
139:Google
97:delete
50:delete
463:could
422:with
334:and
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
650:talk
626:talk
599:talk
536:this
506:last
489:make
432:talk
418:and
403:talk
382:talk
363:talk
311:talk
222:czar
204:2008
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
644:).
584:111
525:111
475:111
266:111
189:TWL
118:– (
652:)
628:)
601:)
434:)
426:.
405:)
384:)
365:)
330:.
313:)
217:.
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:.
648:(
624:(
597:(
430:(
401:(
380:(
361:(
309:(
233:·
228:·
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.