308:
Notable means "worthy of being noted" or "attracting notice." It is not synonymous with "fame" or "importance." Please consider notable and demonstrable effects on culture, society, entertainment, athletics, economies, history, literature, science, or education. Large organizations are likely to have
198:
Which network aired the regional Emmy Awards for
Tennessee, North Carolina, and part of Alabama on national television? I found the videostream of the awards at the link you provided, but it didn't indicate who broadcast the ceremony. I would have thought the ceremony was broadcast only in the local
320:
Regardless of whether the
Academy itself makes such a distinction, I think that Wikipedians can judge for themselves whether a competition involving only television stations in Tennessee, North Carolina, and part of Alabama is as notable as a similar competition which is run on a national basis.
293:
This is not an article but a subpage that was created to save space on the main page. If you will look, the subpage is directing you pack to the main page. As far as notability goes, the academy does not distinguish between regional and nationals when it comes to being an "Emmy" winner. So, for
227:
has 19 regions and divides the awards up among the regions because it cannot hold all of the awards at one time. This is also the reason we have the "Daytime" and "Primetime" Emmy's. Each chapter has it's own televised awards show and one can tune in on a PBS channel and watch whatever regional
309:
more readily available verifiable information from reliable sources that provide evidence of notability; however, smaller organizations can be notable, just as individuals can be notable, and arbitrary standards should not be used to create a bias favoring larger organizations.
381:
for such "list" articles spliting off a parent article so as to not overburden the parent, and Wiki has room to recognize that notability is notability, no matter if its only for a few dozen million in a national region or 300 million nation-wide. In the
410:, the puzzle itself is allowed and encouraged. Tag if for expansion and sourcing and encourage pro-active participation in further improving the article. It has existed for less than a month and it improves wiki to allow it to grow per
250:. No one can say that he is non notable! The bottom line of this whole matter is that this page is a SUB PAGE that stems from a host article and not the article itself. No one seems to be realizing that. Then to argue that it is
181:
I am unsure as to how a major award does not indicate notability. The google search will take yout o the emmys themselves and they are aired on national television just as the international awards are as seen here:
185:. So, on the issue of notability for wikipedia guidelines, if a porn stars page can be kept because it states that they have won one non notable award, then why should something as notable as an
311:
I believe that this would meet this criteria. Just because it is not a part of the
International awards broadcast does not mean that it is non notable and worthy of its own place on wikipedia.
246:
and so on. The stations listed as winners here are notable and most have their own page. A majority of the winners are also notable. One in particular is
Christian recording star,
344:
136:
103:
98:
107:
228:
ceremony they want. The academy recognizes each chapter as being part of the international offices and the information can be found on their main web site
90:
406:. It is the height of hubris to suggest that such notability must be nation-wide in order to matter. As long as the pieces of the puzzle pass
66:
294:
someone to use that arguement, it is not valid. I would agree with the deletion if all it was were a group of winners and no host article.
17:
394:" for a major portion of the United States. The informations contained therein can show in-depth coverage in reliable sources per
254:? I have re read that guideline and there are too many gray areas and I am not even sure that rule could apply in this instance.
463:
432:
359:
328:
315:
298:
285:
258:
206:
193:
169:
159:
155:
72:
478:
231:
The
Midsouth also has various student awards and scholarships that are sponsored strictly by the national headquarters
36:
94:
427:
477:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
415:
325:
282:
203:
61:
49:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
86:
78:
165:
151:
411:
420:
383:
312:
295:
255:
190:
395:
322:
279:
200:
56:
53:
247:
243:
215:
network on
January 24, 2009. The show was aired at 9:00 PM and hosted by country recording star,
275:
199:
area to which it pertained, but in any event I saw no indication of who the broadcaster was. --
355:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
251:
441:
239:
189:
be discounted as non notable? Doesn't that seem a little moronic for lack of a better word?
403:
407:
399:
375:
351:
124:
372:
216:
164:
Is now referenced to primary source, but still doesn't indicate notability. --
378:
220:
219:. I am really still at a loss here as to why we are debating notability of an
186:
229:
440:
If an award is notable, than a list of those who won it, is valid also.
232:
183:
369:
278:. Just a list of winners of a regional (not national) competition. --
235:
386:
we're not talikng about a neighborhood bake sale, but of something "
224:
471:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
212:
131:
120:
116:
112:
234:. This is true of many various awards such as the
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
481:). No further edits should be made to this page.
345:list of Television-related deletion discussions
223:? Regional or National, an Emmy is an Emmy!
8:
339:
414:. After the keep, move it to the proper
343:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
211:The last broadcast was shown on the
24:
150:does not indicate notability. --
1:
498:
276:indiscriminate information
252:indiscriminate information
416:22nd Midsouth Emmy Awards
52:(correction of a space).
50:22nd Midsouth Emmy Awards
474:Please do not modify it.
464:21:54, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
433:18:16, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
418:per naming conventions.
360:21:54, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
329:08:01, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
316:17:57, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
299:17:45, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
286:16:10, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
259:11:50, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
207:03:15, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
194:22:36, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
160:12:01, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
87:22ndMidsouth Emmy Awards
79:22ndMidsouth Emmy Awards
73:05:04, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
388:worthy of being noted
384:Midsouth Emmy Awards
48:. I'll move this to
44:The result was
392:attracting notice
362:
348:
489:
476:
460:
457:
454:
451:
448:
445:
423:
349:
134:
128:
110:
69:
64:
59:
34:
497:
496:
492:
491:
490:
488:
487:
486:
485:
479:deletion review
472:
458:
455:
452:
449:
446:
443:
421:
313:Canyouhearmenow
296:Canyouhearmenow
256:Canyouhearmenow
240:People's Choice
191:Canyouhearmenow
130:
101:
85:
82:
67:
62:
57:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
495:
493:
484:
483:
467:
466:
435:
363:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
331:
323:Metropolitan90
302:
301:
288:
280:Metropolitan90
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
201:Metropolitan90
176:
175:
174:
173:
141:
140:
81:
76:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
494:
482:
480:
475:
469:
468:
465:
462:
461:
439:
436:
434:
431:
430:
429:
425:
424:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
380:
377:
374:
371:
367:
364:
361:
357:
353:
346:
342:
338:
337:
330:
327:
324:
319:
318:
317:
314:
310:
306:
305:
304:
303:
300:
297:
292:
289:
287:
284:
281:
277:
273:
270:
269:
260:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
237:
233:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
209:
208:
205:
202:
197:
196:
195:
192:
188:
184:
180:
179:
178:
177:
171:
167:
163:
162:
161:
157:
153:
149:
148:Unsourced and
146:
143:
142:
138:
133:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
80:
77:
75:
74:
70:
65:
60:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
473:
470:
442:
437:
428:
426:
419:
412:WP:POTENTIAL
391:
387:
365:
340:
307:
290:
271:
248:David L Cook
244:Telly Awards
168:, 2009-05-11
154:, 2009-05-10
147:
144:
45:
43:
31:
28:
291:Strong Keep
217:Hal Ketchum
396:WP:CLEANUP
221:Emmy Award
187:Emmy Award
370:precedent
352:• Gene93k
422:Schmidt,
398:to pass
242:awards,
137:View log
166:Jeandré
158:12:01z
152:Jeandré
104:protect
99:history
54:King of
404:WP:GNG
390:" or "
326:(talk)
283:(talk)
272:Delete
236:Grammy
204:(talk)
172:21:09z
145:Delete
132:delete
108:delete
459:Focus
225:NATAS
135:) – (
125:views
117:watch
113:links
16:<
438:Keep
408:WP:N
402:and
400:WP:N
376:been
366:Keep
356:talk
341:Note
238:'s,
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
46:keep
379:set
373:has
368:As
350:--
274:as
213:PBS
182:-->
358:)
347:.
321:--
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
71:â™
456:m
453:a
450:e
447:r
444:D
354:(
170:t
156:t
139:)
129:(
127:)
89:(
68:♣
63:♦
58:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.