642:
If you're "having trouble looking through the 31,600 hits to find something notable for inclusion", um, doesn't that imply that the song isn't notable (note that a big portion of those will be lyrics sites)? Anyway, the two useful sentences of information in the "300 MPH" article right now would be
202:
Good God. It's not even law. It just states that, previously, articles have been kept because
Knowledge isn't limited in size to the number of articles it can have. Second, have you ever considered that articles make up topics? Finally, give me a rational reason saying why this article is worthless
403:
as a rebuttle, however, whilst the number of hits might not be an adequate measure of the notability of other subject I believe it is a good measure of the notability of a song. Remember that in this day and age people have easy access to songs over the web and the best selling (and hence most
600:
Most tracks on an album aren't notable enough to be the subject of an article, however if there is suffient non-trivial information that is making the album article too long then a split would be necessary but that is not the case here. It's mostly trivial information from a review that could
661:
The reason I'm having trouble is that there is alot of hits and it's difficult to find the stuff that can be added to the article from such a large number of hits. I submit that for songs, the number of hits can be a judge of notability as I've mentioned above.
404:
covered by the mainstream press) song/single is not necessarily the most notable. Also, the fact there is such a large number of hits on the web has also made it difficult to find mainstream press articles about this song. There is a cite about the
224:. How is the song notable enough to have its own article? What about this article could not be incorporated into the Album? As its not a single, the song and the album are the same topic and should be the same article. --
293:
441:
538:
413:
571:
91:
86:
95:
536:
article too big. So it makes more sense to have it wikilinked inside the article. A separate article lets you wikilink it on other articles like it currently is with a wikilink at
78:
468:
It has to meet the criteria which it currently doesnt. I can't see any reason to assume this article will ever be detailed enough to the point of needing it's own article. --
228:
194:
150:
408:
description of the song cited in this article and this shows some degree of notability enough to keep this article. A redirect wouldn't be as good as this song is both on "
124:
391:. I am the writer of this article. It's a fairly new article and I can't devote 100% of my wikitime to it so I ask that it be given a chance to be written further.
82:
622:
396:
313:
Is it necessary to have an AFD every time I come across an obviously non-notable album track? Can't I just redirect it to the album myself?
74:
66:
671:
656:
634:
616:
586:
555:
525:
497:
483:
453:
383:
362:
342:
322:
305:
280:
256:
231:
216:
197:
178:
140:
60:
347:
I agree, i have done plenty of times. It's feasable that the term might be searched for so a redirect is more useful than a delete. --
530:
But in this case it works much better as a separate article. If every track had a large description about it then it would make the
625:
to find something notable for inclusion. As I mentioned before, I think that 31600 hits are a good measure a songs notability.
17:
417:
392:
221:
56:
667:
630:
551:
546:. Furthermore, there is a nice infobox that let's you navigate through the tracks. This is what wiki was made for.
493:
449:
698:
252:
36:
697:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
488:
Which criteria are you referring to? WP:MUSIC doesn't actually describe criteria but just rough guidelines.
136:
52:
663:
626:
582:
547:
489:
445:
612:
479:
433:
400:
358:
248:
652:
543:
521:
425:
338:
318:
301:
132:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
578:
395:
to completing this article. Based to the number of hits in google about this song there are
379:
225:
211:
191:
173:
131:
not a single, not notable enough for seperate article, should be merged into album article
609:
476:
405:
355:
265:
187:
162:
374:
or redirect this non-notable song to the album, if there is proof the album is notable.
330:
270:
416:" furthermore, a redirect would lose the information in this article. Comparisons to
648:
517:
437:
334:
314:
297:
112:
429:
375:
205:
167:
532:
512:
409:
289:
47:
247:. Fails notability; no indication of WHY this is notable in the article.
440:
seem to have made more or less the same comments in this AFD as well as
161:
notable and contains enough information to warrant its own article.
691:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
516:
soon, so I will incorporate any useful info into that article.
442:
Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion/I'm_Slowly_Turning_into_You
539:
You Don't Know What Love Is (You Just Do as You're Told)
414:
You Don't Know What Love Is (You Just Do as You're Told)
421:
119:
108:
104:
100:
572:
list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions
444:without giving consideration to each individually.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
701:). No further edits should be made to this page.
422:Grease Paint had no cites at all before deletion
264:, article fails to establish notability as per
601:probably be linked to in the review links. --
8:
292:, as a plausible search term. Compare with
399:. Of course you might cite something like
570:: This debate has been included in the
621:I'm having trouble looking through the
412:" as well as being on the B-Side of "
7:
75:300 M.P.H. Torrential Outpour Blues
67:300 M.P.H. Torrential Outpour Blues
222:WP don't get your panties in a wad
24:
190:refers to topics not articles. --
163:Knowledge isn't limited in size
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
418:Grease Paint and Monkey Brains
393:Knowledge:There is no deadline
1:
718:
617:12:32, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
587:00:36, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
556:02:33, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
526:04:47, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
498:00:51, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
484:15:29, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
454:03:55, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
384:03:40, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
363:20:14, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
343:18:21, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
323:18:03, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
306:12:27, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
281:08:45, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
257:07:06, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
232:05:50, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
217:05:46, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
198:05:42, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
179:05:39, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
153:04:36, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
141:01:50, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
542:as well as a wikilink at
694:Please do not modify it.
203:and should be deleted.
32:Please do not modify it.
672:03:43, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
657:07:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
635:01:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
61:07:32, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
510:I plan on working on
434:user:Titanium Dragon
149:per above --Lemmey
44:The result was
615:
589:
575:
544:The White Stripes
482:
426:user:LukeTheSpook
424:. Note also that
420:are not valid as
361:
333:and redirect it.
279:
53:Daniel J. Leivick
709:
696:
664:Pocopocopocopoco
627:Pocopocopocopoco
608:
607:
604:
576:
566:
548:Pocopocopocopoco
490:Pocopocopocopoco
475:
474:
471:
446:Pocopocopocopoco
406:Washington Posts
354:
353:
350:
277:
276:
269:
122:
116:
98:
34:
717:
716:
712:
711:
710:
708:
707:
706:
705:
699:deletion review
692:
605:
602:
472:
469:
351:
348:
294:this recent AFD
274:Esradekan Gibb
272:
271:
249:Titanium Dragon
118:
89:
73:
70:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
715:
713:
704:
703:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
591:
590:
563:
562:
561:
560:
559:
558:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
457:
456:
386:
368:
367:
366:
365:
329:Nope, I would
326:
325:
308:
283:
259:
241:
240:
239:
238:
237:
236:
235:
234:
182:
181:
155:
154:
129:
128:
69:
64:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
714:
702:
700:
695:
689:
688:
673:
669:
665:
660:
659:
658:
654:
650:
646:
641:
638:
637:
636:
632:
628:
624:
620:
619:
618:
614:
611:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
592:
588:
584:
580:
573:
569:
565:
564:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
540:
535:
534:
529:
528:
527:
523:
519:
515:
514:
509:
499:
495:
491:
487:
486:
485:
481:
478:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
458:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
402:
401:WP:GOOGLEHITS
398:
394:
390:
387:
385:
381:
377:
373:
370:
369:
364:
360:
357:
346:
345:
344:
340:
336:
332:
328:
327:
324:
320:
316:
312:
309:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
284:
282:
278:
275:
267:
263:
260:
258:
254:
250:
246:
243:
242:
233:
230:
227:
223:
220:
219:
218:
214:
213:
208:
207:
201:
200:
199:
196:
193:
189:
186:
185:
184:
183:
180:
176:
175:
170:
169:
164:
160:
157:
156:
152:
148:
145:
144:
143:
142:
138:
134:
126:
121:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
58:
54:
50:
49:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
693:
690:
644:
639:
567:
537:
531:
511:
438:user:Lugnuts
388:
371:
310:
285:
273:
261:
244:
210:
204:
172:
166:
158:
146:
133:LukeTheSpook
130:
45:
43:
31:
28:
623:31,600 hits
579:Fabrictramp
430:user:Lemmey
397:31,600 hits
46:rediect to
645:Icky Thump
533:Icky Thump
513:Icky Thump
410:Icky Thump
290:Icky Thump
48:Icky Thump
643:fine for
610:user page
477:user page
356:user page
640:Redirect
311:Question
286:Redirect
266:WP:MUSIC
188:WP:PAPER
125:View log
649:indopug
518:indopug
335:Lugnuts
331:be bold
315:indopug
298:Lugnuts
92:protect
87:history
376:Edison
372:Delete
262:Delete
245:Delete
226:Lemmey
206:Monobi
192:Lemmey
168:Monobi
147:Delete
120:delete
96:delete
606:white
473:white
352:white
123:) – (
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
668:talk
653:talk
631:talk
613:talk
603:neon
583:talk
568:Note
552:talk
522:talk
494:talk
480:talk
470:neon
450:talk
389:Keep
380:talk
359:talk
349:neon
339:talk
319:talk
302:talk
253:talk
229:talk
212:talk
195:talk
174:talk
159:Keep
151:talk
137:talk
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
57:talk
577:--
574:.
288:to
670:)
655:)
647:.
633:)
585:)
554:)
524:)
496:)
452:)
436:,
432:,
428:,
382:)
341:)
321:)
304:)
296:.
268:.
255:)
215:)
177:)
165:.
139:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
59:)
51:.
666:(
651:(
629:(
581:(
550:(
520:(
492:(
448:(
378:(
337:(
317:(
300:(
251:(
209:(
171:(
135:(
127:)
117:(
115:)
77:(
55:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.